| Ourcome |
| Individual interprofessional collaboration |
Instrument used to measure the individual assessment of interprofessional collaboration. It contains three dimensions and a total of 23 items. Each item uses a 5-point Likert scale (ranging from 1 = never to 5 = always). The interprofessional collaboration is then calculated by adding all the items and dividing by 23. The results will vary from 1 to 5, and the higher the achieved value, the better the interprofessional collaboration of the respective team. |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <3.78 or ≥3.78 |
| Individual independent variables |
| Sex |
Gender chosen by the interviewee |
Male or Female |
| Age |
Age in complete years on the day the questionnaire was completed |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <39 or ≥39 |
| Education |
Higher education level |
Up to high school University education Postgraduate studies |
| Specialization in public health |
Lato sensu postgraduate level in Public Health |
Yes, No or Not applicable |
| Time in the profession |
Time working in the profession |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <10 years or ≥10 years |
| Time in the institution |
Length of time working at municipal health department |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <7 years or ≥7 years |
| Time in the team |
Time working in the team |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <3 years or ≥3 years |
| Contextual independent variables (analysis by health team) |
| Team participation |
This factor has 12 items, and each item can be scored on a Likert scale of 1 5. scale ranging from 1 to 5. The “Team participation” factor is then calculated by adding all the items together and dividing by 12. The results will range from 1 a 5, and the higher the achieved value, the better Team participation according to the respondent. |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <3.89 or ≥3.89 |
| Support for new ideas |
This factor has 8 items, and each item can score on a Likert scale of 1 5. scale ranging from 1 to 5. The “Support for new ideas” factor is then calculated by adding all items together and dividing by 8. Results will vary from 1 to 5, and the higher the achieved value, the better Support for new ideas according to the respondent. |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <3.84 or ≥3.84 |
| Team Objectives |
This factor has 11 items, and each item can score on a Likert scale of 1 5. scale ranging from 1 to 7. The “Team Objectives” factor is then calculated by adding all the items together and dividing by 11. The results will range from 1 to 7, and the higher the achieved value, the better Team Objectives according to the respondent. |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <5.79 or ≥5.79 |
| Task orientation |
This factor has 7 items, and each item can be scored on a Likert scale of 1 5. scale ranging from 1 to 7. The “Task orientation” factor is then calculated by adding all the items together and dividing by 7. The results will vary by 1 a 7, and the higher the achieved value, the better Task orientation according to the respondent. |
Dichotomized by the sample median: <5.51 or ≥5.51 |
Thumbnail
Source: Authors.