Usability of computerized nursing process from the ICNP® in
               intensive care units

Barra, Daniela Couto Carvalho; Sasso, Grace Teresinha Marcon Dal; Almeida, Sônia Regina Wagner de

doi:10.1590/S0080-623420150000200019

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article • Rev. esc. enferm. USP 49 (02) • Mar-Apr 2015 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420150000200019 copy

Usability of computerized nursing process from the ICNP® in intensive care units^* * Extracted from the theses "Processo de enfermagem informatizado e a segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva a partir da ICNP® versão 1.0: a evidência clínica para o cuidado," Post-Graduate Program in Nursing, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2012.

Usabilidad del proceso de enfermería informatizado desde la CIPE® en unidades de cuidados intensivos

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the usability of Computerized Nursing Process (CNP) from the ICNP^® 1.0 in Intensive Care Units in accordance with the criteria established by the standards of the International Organization for Standardization and the Brazilian Association of Technical Standards of systems.

METHOD

This is a before-and-after semi-experimental quantitative study, with a sample of 34 participants (nurses, professors and systems programmers), carried out in three Intensive Care Units.

RESULTS

The evaluated criteria (use, content and interface) showed that CNP has usability criteria, as it integrates a logical data structure, clinical assessment, diagnostics and nursing interventions.

CONCLUSION

The CNP is a source of information and knowledge that provide nurses with new ways of learning in intensive care, for it is a place that provides complete, comprehensive, and detailed content, supported by current and relevant data and scientific research information for Nursing practices.

Nursing Process; Nursing Informatics; Information Systems; Intensive Care Units; Classification; Terminology

ITEMS OF EVALUATION	Average	Standard Deviation	Max.	Min.	Variance
The CNP will be useful in your work.	4.76	0.429	5	4	0.1846
I am happy to use this system.	4.53	0.508	5	4	0.2584
By knowing the application of this system, I think it will help me save time to develop my activities with patients in the ICU.	4.50	0.648	5	3	0.42
I intend to use this system in my practice.	4.34	0.745	5	3	0.5553
STANDARD AVERAGE	4.53
STANDARD DEVIATION	0.140

ITEMS OF EVALUATION	Average	Standard Deviation	Max.	Min.	Variance
It was simple to use this system and I understand the issues it addressed.	4.65	0.485	5	4	0.2354
I managed to make appropriate clinical evaluations to determine diagnoses and nursing interventions using this computerized system.	4.57	0.577	5	3	0.3338
The system does not replace my actions; it helps me decide the best way to make decisions according to the scenario / case presented.	4.92	0.271	5	4	0.0738
I felt comfortable using the system.	4.76	0.514	5	3	0.2646
It was easy to learn to use this system.	4.80	0.401	5	4	0.1615
I believe that I could quickly become more productive using this system.	4.57	0.643	5	3	0.4138
The system provides clear error messages telling me how to fix a problem or wrong decision.	3.84	0.833	5	2	0.6954
If I make a mistake in the system, I can easily and quickly recover my data already stored.	3.92	0.796	5	2	0.6338
The information provided by the system (messages, questions, options and other documents) are clear.	4.57	0.577	5	3	0.3338
It's easy to navigate the system to find the information I need.	4.73	0.452	5	4	0.2046
The information in the system is organized properly and includes the physical examination of the ICU patient.	4.65	0.485	5	4	0.2354
STANDARD AVERAGE	4.54
STANDARD DEVIATION	0.164

ITEMS OF EVALUATION	Average	Standard Deviation	Max.	Min.	Variance
The system interface is nice (colors, image, layout of items, navigation, etc.)	4.73	0.452	5	4	0.2046
I liked using the interface of this system.	4.65	0.485	5	4	0.2354
This system has all the functions that I expected it to have.	4.53	0.508	5	4	0.2585
Overall I am satisfied with this system.	4.65	0.485	5	4	0.2354
It is simple and easy to use this system.	4.76	0.514	5	3	0.2646
The organization and the provision of information in the system screens are clear and objective.	4.76	0.429	5	4	0.1846
STANDARD AVERAGE	4.68
STANDARD DEVIATION	0.032

Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Enfermagem Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 419 , 05403-000 São Paulo - SP/ Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 11) 3061-7553, - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: reeusp@usp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding Author: Daniela Couto Carvalho Barra. Campus Universitário Reitor João David Ferreira Lima. Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Trindade CEP 88040-900 - Florianópolis, SC, Brasil E-mail: danyccbarra@gmail.com

ANOVA - NURSES
*Source of variation*	SS	DF	MS	F	*p-value*	F critical value
Between groups	2.384615	3	0.794872	2.241504	0.088087	2.695534
Inside groups	35.46154	100	0.354615
Total	37.84615	103
ANOVA - TEACHERS
Between groups	1	3	0.33333	2			0.1678	3.490
Inside groups	2	12	0.166667
Total	3	15

ANOVA
*Source of variation*	SS	DF	MS	F	*p-value*	F critical value
Between groups	31.161	10	3.11608	9.5581	1E-13 (0.000)	1.8652
Inside groups	89.654	275	0.32601
Total	120.81	285