Introduction of 2nd generation immunometric assays for the measurement of serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), turned them more available, simple and rapid. These methods, based on double identification of the PTH molecule, supposedly measure the intact, bioactive molecule, with the sequence 1-84. Recent works showed that they also measure forms with amino-terminal deletions, like the 7-84 form, which are not able to activate the traditional PTH receptor (PTH1R). Thus, an important practical aspect is the definition of the PTH forms measured by the immunometric assays, a fact that depends on the specificity of the antibodies employed. In this report we compare the results obtained with an in-house immunofluorometric assay that presents a cross-reactivity of 50% with the 7-84 PTH sequence, and two commercial 2nd generation assays, that react 100%. In a first study, 135 samples were measured using our assay and an electrochemiluminescent assay, resulting in a correlation coefficient of 0.961 (P<0.0001) and medians of 35.0 and 51.0ng/L (P<0.0001). In a second study, 252 samples were analyzed using our assay and an immunochemiluminometric assay, resulting in a correlation of 0.883 (P<0.0001) and medians of 36.0 and 45.5ng/L (P<0.0001). In both studies results obtained with the in-house assay were significantly lower, as expected by the specificity of the anti-amino-terminal antibody employed. Our data support the need of a precise description of the specificity of the amino-terminal antibodies employed in 2nd generation PTH assays in order to better compare results and define normal ranges.
Serum PTH; Amino-terminal specific antibodies; PTH circulating forms; Normal values
