Open-access The epidemiology and outcomes of acute intestinal failure: a multicenter Argentine study

INTRODUCTION

Acute intestinal failure (AIF) is a severe, life-threatening condition defined by the reduction of intestinal function below the minimum necessary, requiring intravenous supplementation.(1,2) While European studies provide epidemiological benchmarks, reporting incidence rates of approximately 13 cases per 1,000 hospital admissions, the burden of AIF in Latin America remains largely unknown.(3,4) This critical knowledge gap hinders the development of regional clinical guidelines, resource allocation for nutritional support, and the planning for long-term care, such as home parenteral nutrition (HPN).(5) This study, the first of its kind in Argentina, aimed to determine the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of AIF in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in six Argentinian ICUs from June 1st, 2023, to November 30, 2023. We included all adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the ICU who were diagnosed with AIF and required parenteral nutrition (PN). Patients with pre-existing chronic intestinal failure were excluded. Acute intestinal failure was classified as type I (short-term, usually dysmotility-associated) or type II (prolonged, complex pathology) prospectively at the time of diagnosis by the local investigator, according to the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) criteria. The indication for PN followed strict ESPEN guidelines and the gastrointestinal failure score. Detailed inclusion criteria, definitions, and nutritional management protocols are provided in the Supplementary Material. The primary outcome was the incidence of AIF. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS), mortality, and discharge status (HPN dependency). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 24. Continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables using the Chi-squared test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Institutional Ethics Committees approved the study.

RESULTS

Among 2,704 ICU admissions during the study period, 81 patients developed AIF, yielding an incidence rate of 29.9 cases per 1,000 ICU admissions (95%CI 23.5 - 36.4). The cohort comprised 45 (55.6%) type I and 36 (44.4%) type II AIF patients (Figure 1S - Supplementary Material). As shown in table 1, type I patients were younger (p = 0.044) and had lower comorbidity scores (p = 0.043). Anthropometric characteristics (Table 1S), daily nutritional intake (Table 2S and Figure 2S), nutritional support type (Figure 3S), and PN-related complications (Table 3S) are detailed in the Supplementary Material. Conversely, type II patients, predominantly surgical, exhibited a more complex clinical course. Type II AIF patients had a significantly longer hospital LOS (median 30.5 versus 23 days, p = 0.048). Although overall mortality (24.7%) did not differ statistically between groups (p = 0.565), a critical difference was observed at discharge. While 0% of type I patients required HPN, 19.4% (7/36) of type II AIF patients were discharged requiring HPN (p = 0.004).

Table 1
Baseline characteristics

DISCUSSION

This is the first multicenter study to establish the epidemiological burden of AIF in Argentinian ICUs. Our finding of 29.9 cases per 1,000 admissions provides a critical benchmark for resource planning. This incidence is higher than the 13 cases per 1,000 hospital admissions reported in Europe, reflecting our specific focus on a high-acuity ICU population and active screening by nutritional support teams.(3) In line with international literature, the primary causes in our cohort were gastrointestinal dysmotility (type I) and complex abdominal pathology (type II).(3) The most significant clinical finding is the high rate of progression to chronic intestinal failure; nearly one in five type II AIF patients required HPN at discharge.(6) This figure highlights a substantial long-term healthcare burden and underscores the urgent need for structured intestinal rehabilitation and transitional care programs.(7-10)

DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI & AI-ASSISTED TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WRITING PROCESS

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools, specifically ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-4), were used to improve the clarity of English grammar, spelling, and language structure in the preparation of this manuscript. These tools were employed to enhance the readability and presentation of the text but were not used to generate scientific content, interpret data, or influence the study's conclusions. All intellectual and scientific contributions, as well as the accuracy and integrity of the data presented, remain the sole responsibility of the authors. The final manuscript was thoroughly reviewed and approved by the authors to ensure compliance with ethical and professional standards for scientific publication.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

REFERENCES

  • 1 Pironi L, Arends J, Bozzetti F, Cuerda C, Gillanders L, Jeppesen PB, et al.; Home Artificial Nutrition & Chronic Intestinal Failure Special Interest Group of ESPEN. ESPEN guidelines on chronic intestinal failure in adults. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(2):247-307.
  • 2 Klek S, Forbes A, Gabe S, Holst M, Wanten G, Irtun Ø, et al. Management of acute intestinal failure: A position paper from the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Special Interest Group. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(6):1209-18.
  • 3 Reintam Blaser A, Ploegmakers I, Benoit M, Holst M, Rasmussen HH, Burgos R, et al.; AIF study group. Acute intestinal failure: international multicenter point-of-prevalence study. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(1):151-8.
  • 4 Martinuzzi AL, Manrique E, Roel P, Cornú M, Lombi Y. Sobre la incidencia de la falla intestinal aguda en las unidades de cuidados críticos de la Argentina. Rev Cubana Aliment Nutr. 2021;31(1):1-32.
  • 5 Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30(1):175-201.
  • 6 Kyrana E, Beath SV, Gabe S, Small M, Hill S, et al.; BAPEN; BSPGHAN Nutrition Working Group. Current practices and experience of transition of young people on long term home parenteral nutrition (PN) to adult services - A perspective from specialist centres. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2016;14:9-13.
  • 7 Martinuzzi A, Crivelli A, Flores A, Manrique E, Pochettino F, Solar Muñiz H, et al. Cost savings of home parenteral nutrition compared with hospital parenteral nutrition: a multicenter prospective analysis. Nutr Clin Pract. 2026;41(1):129-42.
  • 8 Rhoda KM, Parekh NR, Lennon E, Shay-Downer C, Quintini C, Steiger E, et al. The multidisciplinary approach to the care of patients with intestinal failure at a tertiary care facility. Nutr Clin Pract. 2010;25(2):183-91.
  • 9 Jung SM, Lee S, Park HJ, Kim HJ, Min JK, Seo JM. Multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation in acute type II intestinal failure: results from an intestinal rehabilitation team. Asian J Surg. 2021;44(3):549-52.

Edited by

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    17 July 2026
  • Date of issue
    2026

History

  • Received
    17 Nov 2025
  • Accepted
    18 Feb 2026
location_on
Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB Rua Arminda, 93 - 7º andar - Vila Olímpia, CEP: 04545-100, Tel.: +55 (11) 5089-2642 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: ccs@amib.org.br
rss_feed Stay informed of issues for this journal through your RSS reader
Go to top Report error