Validation of a questionnaire to identify variables that influence the decision-making of setters on different process in Volleyball

Bordini, Fábio Luis; Marques, Inara

doi:10.1590/S1980-6574201900020008

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil

Motriz: Revista de Educação Física

Español English

Brasil

Español English

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Sumário

Original Article (full paper) • Motriz: rev. educ. fis. 25 (2) • 2019 • https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201900020008 copy

Validation of a questionnaire to identify variables that influence the decision-making of setters on different process in Volleyball

Authorship SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Abstract

Aim:

The present study aimed to construct and validate a questionnaire to identify which information could influence the decision-making process of the setters, according to the functional structure of the volleyball game.

Method:

The questionnaire had 55 questions, divided into four sections, and was answered by 16 volleyball coaches with an international career (32.8 ± 5.35 years). The analysis of the results consisted of: (1) descriptive analysis; (2) calculation of agreement between observers; (3) Mode calculation for importance scale; (4) Response index for classification of the information described; (5) Median and interquartile range for the evaluation of the questionnaire.

Results:

The results indicated that, environmental factors are involved in the decision-making process of the setters and that they influenced, in distinct ways, the decision-making of the setters during the Attack and Counterattack Processes in a volleyball match.

Conclusion:

Thus, according to the coaches’ analysis, the instrument was considered reliable and appropriate for the application and use.

Keywords:
volleyball; decision making; setters; questionnaire

Function	Age*	Level of competition in which he worked	Time in the job*
Coach	43,90	International	7
Coach	42,37	International	21
Coach	44,58	International	25
Coach	37,59	International	5
Coach	41,86	International	20
Coach	47,04	International	22
Coach	52,93	International	33
Coach	47,27	International	15
Coach	35,69	International	17
Coach	41,36	International	21
Coach	46,73	International	25
Coach	55,16	International	32
Coach	47,98	International	27
Coach	39,90	International	15
Coach	45,71	International	15
Coach	51,54	International	32

Ranking	Information	RI
1^st	Hitters’ Availability	97.92
2^nd	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactics - Positioning	97.92
3^rd	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactics - Anticipation	95.83
4^th	Blocking Weak Point	93.75
5^th	Middle-Hitter’s Availability	91.67
6^th	Setting Zone	85.42
7^th	Set Period	81.25
8^th	Last Ball Attacked	70.31
9^th	Setting Technique	69.27
10^th	First Contact Quality - pass	60.55
11^th	Team’s Net Composition	60.16
12^th	Reception Zone - pass	44.01
13^th	Who Made the First Contact - pass	41.93
14^th	Longest Distance Hitter	40.63
15^th	Infiltration/Exchange Position	17.58
16^th	Opponent Team’s Serve Location	15.63
17^th	Opponent Team’s Serve Type	13.67

Information of the Team	Related Information
Psychological situation of players	Set Period
Attacker’s Approach to fit the balls	Who, Quality and Zone of First Contact and Hitter’s Availability
Technical data from video analysis during the preparation	All Information
Best Hitter	Not Included
Game Score	Survey Site Set Period
Hitter in the shortest distance	Not included
Statistical data during matches	All Information
Availability of player to receive the lifted ball	Who, Quality and Zone of First Contact and Hitter’s Availability

Opponent Team Information	Related Information
Placement of the central blocker in relation to the central striker	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactics - Positioning
Positioning of defense players	Not included
Opponent’s block quality	Blocking Weak Point
Substitution in the opposing team	All Information
Opponent blocking technique	Not included
Anticipation of middle	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactic - Anticipation
Previous matches (in the game and in other matches)	All Information

Ranking	Information	RI
1^st	Hitters’ Availability	95.83
2^nd	Blocking Weak Point	89.58
3^rd	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactics - Positioning	87.50
4^th	Middle-Hitter’s Availability	83.33
5^th	Set Period	81.25
6^th	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactic - Anticipation	81.25
7^th	Last Ball Attacked	70.31
8^th	Setting Technique	65.63
9^th	First Contact Quality - Defense	64.45
10^th	Setting Zone	58.33
11^th	Who Made the First Contact - Defense	54.69
12^th	Opponent Team’s Blocking Technique - Formation	54.17
13^th	Team’s Net Composition	46.88
14^th	Defense Zone	35.94
15^th	Efficiency of Blockers	35.81
16^th	Opponent Team’s Attack Type	31.25
17^th	Longest Distance Hitter	28.65
18^th	Infiltration/Exchange Position	16.67
19^th	Location of Opponent Team’s Attack	11.72

Adversary Team Information	Related Information
Best attacker	Not included
First Contact Quality	First Contact Quality
Substitution in the opposing team by moving to positions that are farther from their attack positions	All Information
Striker in the shortest distance	Not included
Perception of players fatigue in longer rallies	Who, Quality and Zone of First Contact and Attackers Availability

Opponent Team Information	Related Information
Substitution in the opposing team	All Information
Characteristics of the blockers	Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactics - Positioning; Opponent Team’s Blocking Tactic - Anticipation; Blocking Weak Point
First Contact Quality	First Contact Quality

Universidade Estadual Paulista Universidade Estadual Paulista, Av. 24-A, 1515, 13506-900 Rio Claro, SP/Brasil, Tel.: (55 19) 3526-4330 - Rio Claro - SP - Brazil
E-mail: motriz.rc@unesp.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

[1] Corresponding author Fábio Luis Bordini Colégio Militar de Curitiba, Coordenação de Educação Física. Praça Conselheiro Thomaz Coelho, 01 CEP: 82800-030 Tarumã, Curitiba, Paraná. Email: flbordini@gmail.com