A corrupção política é um dos problemas mais graves e complexos enfrentados pelas novas e velhas democracias. Fundamentalmente, ela envolve o abuso de poder público para qualquer tipo de benefício privado, incluindo vantagens para partidos de governo. Desqualifica, assim, o princípio de igualdade política inerente à democracia, pois seus protagonistas podem obter ou manter poder e benefícios políticos desproporcionais ao que conseguiriam por meio de formas legítimas e legais de competir politicamente. Ao mesmo tempo, a corrupção distorce a dimensão republicana da democracia porque faz com que as políticas públicas resultem, não do debate e da disputa pública entre diferentes projetos, mas de acordos de bastidores que favorecem interesses espúrios. Apesar da eficiência de instrumentos metodológicos clássicos como pesquisas de opinião com questionário estruturado e pesquisas qualitativas com grupos focais, ainda é possível identificar vieses na qualidade das informações coletadas sobre corrupção. Este artigo visa abordar essa questão apresentando dois experimentos de pesquisa, um realizado em 2014 e outro em 2018. A pesquisa de 2014 indicou que há uma diferença substantiva entre a pergunta direta e a pergunta experimental. O nível de tolerância à corrupção é muito superior ao apontado por outros instrumentos metodológicos. A comparação com o experimento de 2018 permitiu a validação e extrapolação dos resultados encontrados por Moisés e Nunes de Oliveira (2018).
democracia; corrupção política; opinião pública
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Source: Transparency International, 2018.Note: WE/EU: Western Europe and European Union; SSA: Sub-Saharan Africa; MENA: Middle East and North Africa; ECA: Europe and Central Asia; AP: Asia-Pacific; AME: America.
Source: Transparency International, 2018.
Source: Latinobarometro, 2018.Question: One can allow some corruption if that is the price to pay to solve problems. Do you strongly agree (1), agree (2), disagree (3) or strongly disagree (4) with this statement?
Source: Latinobarometro, 2018.Question: When you know something corrupt better not to get involved and keep quiet. Do you strongly agree (1), agree (2), disagree (3) or strongly disagree (4) with this statement?
Source: Latinobarometro, 2018.Question: If I do not report an act of corruption, I know I become an accomplice. Do you strongly agree (1), agree (2), disagree (3) or strongly disagree (4) with this statement?
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.Question: Would you say that corruption in Brazil is a serious problem? It's a very serious problem (1), it's a serious problem (2), a little serious problem, it's not a problem (3).
Source: Own elaboration based on data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.Questions: Would you say that corruption in Brazil is a serious problem? It's a very serious problem (1), it's a serious problem (2), a little serious problem, it's not a problem (3) / What is your gender? Female (1), Male (2).
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.Questions: Would you say that corruption in Brazil is a serious problem? It's a very serious problem (1), it's a serious problem (2), a little serious problem, it's not a problem (3) / Until to what grade did you study and conclude? Primary (1), Intermediate (2), Higher Education (3).
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.Questions: Would you say that corruption in Brazil is a serious problem? It's a very serious problem (1), it's a serious problem (2), a little serious problem, it's not a problem (3) / Some people say that democracy is always better than any other form of government. For others, in some situations a dictatorship is better than a democracy. Which of these statements is most like your way of thinking? Democracy is always better than any other form of government (1); In some situations, a dictatorship is better than a democracy (2); Whatever / Neither is better (3).
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.
Source: Own elaboration based on Data from NUPPs, 2014; ESEB, 2018.