Abstract
James G. Holland was a dissonant voice not only within behavior analysis, but also in the wider context of political thought in the United States. This article aims to present the main criticisms and suggestions made by Holland towards the application of behavior analysis and to evaluate its contemporary relevance. We conclude that such criticisms and suggestions are useful for all behavior analysts, as they contribute to promote the continued internal evaluation of the social consequences of our practices and the extensive analysis of the interlocking contingencies occurring in intervention settings and its influence over our goal-setting.
Keywords:
James G. Holland; radical behaviorism; behavior analysis; politics