| 1 |
De Souza et al099 De Souza TP, Fleck SJ, Simão R, Dubas JP, Pereira B, Pacheco EM de B, et al. Comparison Between Constant And Decreasing Rest Intervals: Influence On Maximal Strength And Hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(7):1843-50. (2010) |
20 young people trained recreationally |
Compare the effect on strength and hypertrophy of 8 weeks of resistance training using constant rest intervals (Cri) and decreasing rest intervals (Dri) |
8 training weeks with 6 weekly training sessions, A and B training sessions, with constant and decreasing intervals. 2 first weeks 3x 10 to 12RM with 2 min interval. After 3 weeks, the Constant group used a 2-minute interval and 4x 8 at 10RM. |
Dumbbell bench press, dumbbell incline bench press, front pull, Dumbbell Shoulder press, side elevation, biceps curl, tríceps pulley, barbell triceps extension, lever leg extension lying leg curl |
constant rest intervals and decreasing rest intervals |
The total training volume (resistance series x for all training sessions) during the 8 weeks of training for the bench press, the Cri group (21,257.9 ± 172.7 kg) was significantly higher (p = 0.043) than the group Dri (19,250.4 ± 343.8 kg). Likewise, the total volume of training in the squat performed by the Cri group (27,248.2 ± 293.8 kg) was significantly higher (p = 0.000) than the Dri group (23,453.6 ± 299.4 kg). |
| 2 |
Ammar et al36 (2019) |
9 Olympic weightlifters |
Examine the effect of intermaximal repetition of 3 vs. 2-minute rest period in maintaining technical efficiency and the production of energy during 2 successive maximum repetitions of Clean & Jerk (C&J) |
2 warm-up sessions 4 clean and jerk lifting sessions with 2 and 3 minutes intervals between attempts, analyzing technique and power |
Clean and jerk |
2 e 3 minutes |
Statistical analysis showed that 1-minute RI improved the maintenance of the ideal pushing technique, evidenced by the reduction of falls in the vertical peak displacement bar (2.74%; p = 0.03), maximum bar speed (2.89% %; p = 0.03) and peak of the knee (1.61%; p = 0.03) and hip extensions (1.59%; p = 0.03) during the push movement phase. In addition, the 3 min IR led to the maintenance of the ideal elevation strategy, reducing the increase in horizontal displacement during the descending (3.85%; p = 0.04) and ascending (5.42%; o = 0, 02). |
|
3
|
Senna et al088 Senna G, Willardson JM, Scudese E, Simão R, Queiroz C, Avelar R, et al. Effect Of Different Interset Rest Intervals On Performance Of Single And Multijoint Exercises With Near-Maximal Loads. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;30(3):710-6. (2016) |
15 trained men |
To investigate the acute effects of different rest intervals between sets on the performance of and multi-joint exercises with near maximum loads |
8 sessions in total, 2 per week. Each session 5 series of 3RM until exhaustion. Rest intervals 1, 2, 3 and 5min |
Chest fly machine and bench press dumbbell |
1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes |
In the crucifix exercise, there were significantly> total repetitions> completed for 2- (12.60 ± 2.35 repetitions; p = 0.027), 3- (13.66 ± 1.84 repetitions; p = 0.001) and 5 minutes (12.93 ± 2.25 representatives; p = 0.001) vs. 1 minute protocol (10.33 ± 2.60 reps). For BP, a significantly> total number of repetitions was completed for 3- (11.66 6 2.79 repetitions; p = 0.002) and 5 minutes (12.93 ± 2.25 repetitions; p = 0.001) vs. 1 minute (7.60 ± 3.52 reps). In addition, the subjects completed a total number of significantly> repetitions in the 5-minute protocol (12.93 ± 2.25 repetitions; p = 0.016) vs. 2 minutes (9.53 ± 3.11 representatives). |
|
4
|
Rahimi et al2929 Rahimi R. Effect of different rest intervals on the exercise volume completed during squat bouts. J Sport Sci Med. 2005;4(4):361-6. (2005) |
20 college men |
Compare the effect of 3 different rest intervals on the completed squat volume during a workout |
4 sets of squats with rest intervals of 1, 2 and 5 min between sets at 85% of 1RM |
Squat |
1, 2 and 5 minutes |
The completed volume for the squat was significantly different between the 1 and 5 minute rest conditions and between the 2 and 5 minute rest (p <0.001, 0.002; however, the completed volume was not significantly different between the resting conditions of 1 and 2 minutes (p = 0.190; intra-class reliability for the squat was 0.97. The 5-minute rest allowed greater volume when training with 85% of 1RM of the load, stimulating greater adaptation of force |
| 5 |
Miranda et al3030 Miranda H, Simão R, Moreira LM, de Souza RA, de Souza JAA, de Salles BF, et al. Effect of rest interval length on the volume completed during upper body resistance exercise. J Sport Sci Med. 2009;8(3):388-92. (2009) |
12 recreational trained men |
Compare the volume exercise (series x load x repetitions per series) completed during two resistance exercise sessions that incorporated rest intervals of 1 minutes vs 3 minutes between sets and exercises |
3 training sessions, one for evaluation and 2 for effective training. 5 upper body exercises with a maximum load of 8RM with 1 and 3 minutes of intervals between sets comparing the total training volume related to rest |
Bench press, bench press inclined, pec deck, barbell triceps extension, tríceps pulley |
1 and 3 minutes |
The total volume of training completed (sets x load x repetitions per set) for all exercises was significantly higher for the 3-minute resting condition versus the 1-minute resting condition (p <0.05;). Within each resting condition, there were significant differences in the repetitions completed for each series of exercises (p <0.05;). In addition, there were significant differences between resting conditions in completed repetitions for most sets of exercises (p <0.05) |
|
6
|
Miranda et al3232 Miranda H, Fleck SJ, Simão R, Barreto AC, Dantas EHM, Novaes J. Effect of two different rest period lengths on the number of repetitions performed during resistance training. J Strength Cond Res. 2007;21(4):1032-6. (2007) |
14 recreational trained men |
Compare the effects of 2 different rest periods during a resistance training session with the number of repetitions completed per set of each exercise, the volume completed in 3 sets of each exercise, and the total volume during a training session |
2 exercise sessions separated by 48 to 72 hours in a balanced crossover design. 3 sets until exhaustion with a load of 8 RM for each exercise. |
Cable pulldown closed handle, Cable pulldown open handle, seated row, barbell bench press, dumbbell biceps curl, biceps curl machine |
1 and 3 minutes |
The total training volume (total number of repetitions in all sets of all exercises) in SEQ 3 (107.2 3.03 repetitions) was significantly higher than SEQ 1 (78.9 3.28 repetitions). Sequence 1 demonstrated significantly lower values for the number of completed repetitions in all 3 sets for all exercises compared to SEQ 3 As the rest interval increases, the total number of completed repetitions also increases. The number of repetitions was greater in the 3-minute rest compared to 1 minute. |
| 7 |
De Salles et al3333 De Salles BF, Polito MD, Goessler KF, Mannarino P, Matta TT, Simão R. Effects of fixed vs. self-suggested rest between sets in upper and lower body exercises performance. Eur J Sport Sci. 2016;16(8):927-31. (2016) |
27 healthy young people |
Analyze the effects of the Fixed versus Self Rest Interval Suggested Between Sets on Performance in Lower and Upper Body Exercises |
They were divided into 2 groups: G1 squat and leg press, G2 bench press and barbell curl. After the 1RM tests, they trained 3 sets to failure with 75% of 1RM at 2 min intervals and auto suggested on separate days. Performance was assessed for the number of repetitions |
squat, leg press, bench pres, bíceps curl |
2 minutes, self selected |
There were no significant differences between a 2-min recovery interval and self-selected for total repetitions in all exercises. There were significant differences between the intervals for leg press, bench press and biceps curl (p <0.05). No significant differences were found between different RI for all exercises. For squats, the suggested RI results in a significant reduction in the number of repetitions from the first set to the second and third |
|
8
|
Tibana et al3131 Tibana RA, Vieira DCL, Tajra V, Bottaro M, De Salles BF, Willardson JM, et al. Effects of rest interval length on smith machine bench press performance and perceived exertion in trained men. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;117(3):682-95. (2013) |
10 recreational trained men |
Compare two different rest intervals between sets of resistance exercises |
5x smith bench press with 60% 1RM with 1.5m and 3min intervals |
Bench press machine |
1, 3 and 5 minutes |
In general, the performance was better and the fatigue was lower in the IR 3 min, supporting all hypotheses, except Hypothesis 4. Overall, the performance was better and the fatigue was lower in the 3 min. IR, supporting all hypotheses, except Hypothesis 4. The 3-minute interval protocol showed higher values for power, training volumes, average speed and peak power |
|
9
|
Fink et al2727 Fink J, Kikuchi N, Nakazato K. Effects of rest intervals and training loads on metabolic stress and muscle hypertrophy. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;38(2):261-8. (2016) |
20 young athletes |
Compare short rest intervals combined with low-load RT and long rest intervals combined with high-load RT in relation to muscle hypertrophy and strength results. |
Two groups of 10 men took two types of intervals, 30s with 20RM and 3 minutes with 8RM, for 8 weeks, 3x a week until failure. Cross section and acute GH effects were evaluated. 3 exercises for biceps and triceps |
Bíceps curl and tríceps extension |
30 seconds and 3 minutes |
Only the SL group showed significant increases in GH (7704.20 11833 49%, P <0 05) and MT (35 2 16 9%, P<0 05) immediately after training. After 8 weeks, the CSAs of the arm in both groups increased significantly [SL: 9 93.4 86% (P <001), LH: 4 73 3 01% (P <0 05)]. No significant correlation between acute elevations in GH and increases in CSA can be observed. The data showed a tendency for greater increases in the muscular CSA in the SL group compared to the LH group, despite the similarity in the training volume. |
|
10
|
Lemos et al37 (2018) |
15 trained men |
To compare the effect of a strength training session performed with different exercise orders and rest intervals in BP and HRV in a normotensive trained man |
6 exercises with a load of 15RM in two sequences of exercise execution, with Seq A from large to small and Seq B from small to large, both with 40 and 90 sec of rest interval between sets |
Bench press, front pulldown, seated row, Upright row, triceps extension, biceps curl |
40 and 90 seconds |
The total load volume did not differ significantly between protocols, therefore, the total amount of work performed in all sequences was similar (p> 0.05). A comprehensive upper body TF session, with 90 sec IR between sets and exercises promoted a longer HPE, specifically in SBP, compared to a 40-second rest interval between sets and exercises regardless of the order of exercise |
| 11 |
Shoenfeld et al38 (2016) |
21 trained university men |
To investigate the effects of short rest intervals normally associated with training hypertrophy versus long rest intervals traditionally used in TF on muscle adaptations in a cohort of young lifters |
Separated into two groups, one with 1 min and the other with 3 min intervals. 8 weeks with 3x training per week and 3x from 8 to 12 RM 7 exercises |
Bech press and squat |
1 and 3 minutes |
The total volume of aggregate load in the 8 weeks was higher on an absolute basis for LONG compared to SHORT (51,385 x 9420 vs 44,755 x 12,166 kg, respectively): These results were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.18), |
|
12
|
Maia et al39 (2015) |
14 recreational trained men |
Examine the length of the rest interval between agonist-antagonist (PS) training, maximum repetition performance, classification of perceived exertion and neuromuscular fatigue. |
2 strength training protocols using the agonist vs. antagonist method. With two intervals (2 and 4 minutes of rest) with a load of 8RM until failure. |
Dumbell inverted fly, bíceps curl, bench press, tríceps extension |
2 and 4 minutes |
No significant differences were found in the total number of repetitions completed between the rest interval protocols for the bench press (P2 ¼ 22.9 ± 1.3 and P4 ¼ 22.6 ± 0.8) and sitting row (P2 ¼ 25.4 ± 1.7 and P4 ¼ 25.1 ± 1.3). At the However, a significantly higher fatigue index was found for all muscles under the P2 versus P4 protocol. The current study demonstrated similar repetition performance with PS agonist-antagonist training protocols that used 2 or 4 minute rest intervals between the OS with a moderate load (for example, 8-RM) |
| 13 |
Paz et al40 (2019) |
15 recreational trained men |
To investigate the effect of different paired joint rest intervals (PS) on the total volume of work and training, efficiency (training volume load / session duration time) and myoelectric activity. |
4 protocols of training with 30, 60, 90 and 120 sec intervals with 10 RM load |
Bench press (BP)/lat pull downl (LPD), bench press inclined (BP30)/seated row (SR), and triceps extension (TE)/ Bíceps curl (BC). |
30, 60, 90 e 120 seconds |
The volume load (repetitions x series x loads) was significantly lower at P30 (5385.8 ± 1224 kg) versus P60 (6755.6 ± 1398.5 kg), P90 (7358.3 ± 1490.3 kg) and P120 Protocols (7463 ± 1310 kg). There were no significant differences in sEMG activity between the protocols. The efficiency (kg $ min 1) of P30 (633.6 ± 144) was significantly higher compared to P60 (397.4 ± 82.2), P90 (288.5 ± 58.4) and P120 (219.5 ± 38.5) significantly less total work in protocols P30 versus P60, P90 and P120 for all exercises, (b) lower total volume of training observed in P30 versus protocols P60, P90 and P120; and (c) a similar total volume was observed for the P60, P90 and P120 protocols. However, higher efficiency (TTV / time) was observed at P30 versus protocols P60, P90 and P120. |
| 14 |
Sociarelli et al3535 Sosciarelli V, Polito M. Intervalo De Recuperação Auto-Sugerido: Efeito Agudo Na Quantidade De Repetições E Na Densidade De Treinamento Em Homens Treinados. Rev Bras Ciência e Mov. 2019;27(3):122. (2019) |
12 trained men |
Compare the effect of fixed and self-suggested recovery intervals during bench press exercise under the number of repetitions and training density in trained men |
4 series until exhaustion at 70% of 1RM with intervals of 1 to 2 min, 2 to 3 and self suggested |
Bench press |
1 a 2, 2 a 3, self suggested |
The analysis of the results showed that INT1 had a lower number of repetitions (28.9 ± 4.7) only in relation to the AS interval (34.0 ± 7.2; P = 0.02). On the other hand, the training density of INT1 was higher (5.6 ± 1.8) than INT2 (4.5 ± 1.3; P = 0.002) and AS (3.8 ± 1.4; P = 0.004) There was no difference for PSE |
| 15 |
Machado et al41 (2012) |
50 adult men |
Examine creatine kinase (CK) activity after resistance exercise sessions in subjects classified as high (HiR), medium (MeR) or low responders (LoR). |
4 x direct thread to failure with 85% 1RM with 1 and 3 minutes interval between sets |
Biceps curl |
1 and 3 minutes |
For all groups (ie LoR, MeR and HiR), the number of repetitions and volume decreased similarly in the 3 groups indicated by the main non-significant effect for the group (F2.376 = 1.58, p = 0.208 for repetitions; F2.376 = 2.31, p = 0.101 for completed volume), non-significant interaction for group3 rest interval (F2.376 = 0.542, p = 0.582 for repetitions; F2.376 = 0.376, p = 0.687 for the completed volume) and the non-significant interaction for group 3 (F6.376 = 1.06, p = 0.385 for repetitions; F6.376 = 0.537, p = 0.780 for completed volume). |
|
16
|
Ahtiainen et al2323 Ahtiainen JP, Pakarinen A, Alen M, Kraemer W, Hakkinen K. Short Vs. Long Rest Period Between The Sets In Hypertrophic Resistance Training: Influence On Muscle Strength, Size, And Hormonal Adaptations In Trained Men. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(3):572-82. (2005) |
13 recreational trained men |
Investigate acute hormonal and neuromuscular responses and recovery 2 protocols of hypertrophic heavy resistance performed with a similar general volume of exercise; |
Two training sessions, with 3 months for each group to carry out the two protocols. 5x leg press, 4x squat, with 2 minutes rest. The second session was 4x leg press and 3 squat loads of 10RM |
Leg press and squat |
2 and 5 minutes |
No significant changes occurred in body mass (from 83.9 ± 11.7 kg to 84.6 ± 12.9 kg) or body fat percentage (from 14.8 ± 3.9% to 15.3 ± 3.6 %) during the 6-month experimental training period in the total group of subjects. There were no statistically significant differences in the total training load. In 6 months, a significant increase of 6.8 ± 8.7% (from 3,370 6 748 to 3,613 6 949 N) (p, 0.05) was recorded in the maximum isometric extension of the leg strength in the total group of subjects |
| 17 |
Ibbot et al1515 Ibbott P, Ball N, Welvaert M, Thompson KG. The Effect of Self-Paced and Prescribed Inter-Set Rest Strategies on Performance in Strength Training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(7):980-6 (2019) |
16 male athletes |
Evaluate stimulation strategies using rest periods between prescribed and self-selected intervals and their influence on performance in trained athletes in strength. |
3 5x 5rep training sessions with different intervals 3 and 5 and self suggested |
squat |
3, 5 and self suggested |
Self suggested rest time between sets increased from sets 1 to 4 (207.52s> 277.71 s; p = 0.01). There is not differences in mechanical performance was shown between the different conditions of the rest period between sets. Power (210 W; 8.03%) and speed (0.03 m.s-1; 6.73%) decreased as the sets progressed for all the conditions (p <0.001) from set 1 to set 5. |
|
18
|
Ibbot et al3434 Ibbott P, Ball N, Welvaert M, Thompson KG. Variability and Impact of Self-Selected Interset Rest Periods During Experienced Strength Training. Percept Mot Skills. 2019;126(3):546-58. (2019b) |
16 male athletes |
To investigate the variability of self-selected rest periods for strength-trained athletes between squat training sets heavy |
2 training sessions with self selected 5x5RM squat intervals. At the end of each series, the individual indicated his / her perceived effort scale |
squat |
Self selected |
Only one participant was unable to complete the necessary repetitions until the end. The average duration of rest was 283 ± 101 for session 01 and 249 ± 76 for session 02. The average rest was shorter in AS2 than in AS1. The rest period increased significantly after series 3 and 4 in relation to series 1 There was no significant difference between sessions for PSE |
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
