The author addresses the relevant issue of the relationship between doctor and patient, considering that biomedical research applications could raise dilemmas to the medical profession's practice in a contemporary and secular society. In this context, he seeks to discuss the medical attendance and analyses aspects concerned with paternalism and the prerogatives of patient's autonomy in perspective of the beneficence and autonomy principles. The beneficence constitutes one of the prerogatives in Medicine practice and relates to acting in the patient's best interest; beneficence takes on a character of bioethics reflection, and the application of the rules implies distinguishing general beneficence from specific beneficence; making medical decision without considering the opinion from a fully capable patient constitutes an unilateral conduct, called medical paternalism; paternalism can be ethically justified, and sometimes necessary, when there is a temporary or permanent limitation of the patient's self-determination; it is necessary to understand that the application of beneficence actions on a medical attendance takes place within a doctor/patient relationship. The better this relationship is built up, the better the doctor's decision will be in not causing damage to the patient until the procedures of acting for his benefit, respecting his autonomy. We believe that beneficence and paternalism would be more compatible in a relationship where the doctor kept his authority, preserving his knowledge and taking responsibility for making decision, and the patient, in turn, would also take part according to his moral and personal values.
Paternalism; Personal autonomy; Beneficence
