Meat quality of pigs fed grape pomace in different production systems

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation the diet of pigs with grape pomace preserved in silage form (GPS) and its interaction with indoor and outdoor production systems, with and without access to vegetation, on the attributes of meat quality produced. Analyzes of proximal composition, cholesterol content, fatty acid profile, shear force, texture profile and sensory analysis were performed. During cold storage, oxidative stability and objective color were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed in a 3x2 factorial design (production systems (S) x GPS-feed (F)) and the interaction between them (S*F). The results showed that there was no interaction between the production system and GPS feeding for the attributes evaluated. The proximate composition and fatty acid profile of the muscle remained unchanged. Additionally, it provides higher subjective and objective tenderness, higher red color intensity, and reduces lipid oxidation under refrigeration. The supplementation of pig feed with GPS improve the quality of the meat and constitute a sustainable alternative for the winemaking residue.

Key words agro-industrial waste; antioxidant; fatty acid profile; lipid oxidation; sensory analysis; tenderness

INTRODUCTION

Vinification residues, as a source of bioactive compounds, such as phenolic compounds, have attracted attention in several sectors such as the cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and food industries (Beres et al. 2017). Grape pomace is the main solid residue of the wine industry, composed of large amounts of phenolic compounds (Perra et al. 2022). During the production of wine, large quantities of grape pomace are generated, consisting of husks, seeds, and stalks. These components, rich in bioactive compounds, act as antimicrobials, anti-inflammatories and have high antioxidant potential (Yu & Ahmedna 2013, Sirohi et al. 2020).

The use of natural antioxidants can be suitable preservatives for the meat industry (Salami et al. 2019). Recent studies have shown the possibility of developing healthier meat and meat products for consumers, introducing bioactive compounds beneficial to human health through animal nutrition, with emphasis on those with antioxidant properties (Kotsampasi et al. 2014, Francisco et al. 2015, Trombetta et al. 2019).

Studies show that supplementation with grape pomace and its components improves meat quality. Bertol et al. 2013 when adding up to 10% dehydrated grape pomace to the feed of confined pigs, observed improvements in the meat color, with a high intensity of red color. Dietary supplementation with grape compounds, in this case, resveratrol, improved the quality of confined pig meat in the amounts of 300 mg and 600 mg per kg of feed (Zhang et al. 2015). Cheng et al. 2020 when evaluating pigs raised in groups and supplemented with resveratrol, observed that the grape component can inhibit muscle oxidative stress. Trombetta et al. 2019 concluded that the inclusion of 3.5% and 7% grape pomace silage on a dry basis in the feed of confined pigs improved meat quality.

In recent years, there has been an increase in the exploration for organic foods, concern for animal welfare, and an increasing appreciation of welfare parameters in relation to other meat quality attributes (Alonso et al. 2020). There is a growing demand from the population for sustainable methods of meat production. Conventional production is challenged by environmental and animal welfare issues and, therefore, outdoor swine farming becomes an alternative that aims at the welfare and sustainability of production (Therkildsen et al. 2021). Song et al. 2021 concluded in their research that meat from pigs raised outdoors had better nutritional quality, with higher mineral contents compared to meat from pigs raised in a conventional system.

Studies with grape pomace in swine feed are scarce, and no studies have been found with the use of this residue conserved in the form of silage at the level of supplementation proposed, as well as associated with the production system. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation the diet of pigs with grape pomace preserved in silage form and its interaction with indoor and outdoor production systems, with and without access to vegetation, on the attributes of meat quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Local description, grape pomace, and diets

The research was conducted in accordance with the provisions of Law 11,794 of October 8, 2008, with Decree 6,899 of July 15, 2009, as well as with the rules issued by the National Council of the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA), and it was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals of the Farroupilha Federal Institute (CEUA/IFFar), number 5418040518. The experiment was conducted at the Farroupilha Federal Institute, Campus São Vicente do Sul (IFFar-SVS), Brazil, located in the physiographic region denominated Central Depression of Rio Grande do Sul, coordinates 29º41’30 “S and 54º40’46” W, with an altitude of 129 m. The average temperature and relative humidity of the air during the experimental period were 12.45 ± 5.40 ºC and 81.26 ± 15.41%, respectively.

The grape pomace was obtained at a winery of Rural Cooperative São José, located in the city of Jaguari, approximately 30 km from the trial site, originating from red grapes (Vitis vinifera cv. Bordeaux), after a cold-pressing process and stored in plastic bags of approximately 40 kg (Sinuelo, Brazil) with dimensions of 51 cm x 110 cm and a thickness of 200 microns, called grape pomace silage (GPS). The bags were stored in a warehouse for about four months. At the time of inclusion of the GPS in the animal diet, the material was directed to the passage in the stainless steel mesh of 8 mm for unpacking and, thus, allowing a homogeneous mixture with the other ingredients of the diet. The diets were formulated using corn and soybean meal, and a premix with minerals, vitamins, and amino acids (Suipremium CT - Tortuga®), according to the requirements of the category reported by Rostagno et al. 2005, similar in protein, but with variation in the ether extract and carbohydrates contents due to the inclusion of GPS (Table I). The animals received growth ration up to 80 kg and finishing ration until slaughter.

Table I
Ingredients, nutritional composition and fatty acid profile of growth and finishing diets.

	Diets
	Growth		Finishing
Ingredients (g/kg/DM)	Without	With	Without	With
Corn grain	724	550	804	630
Soybean meal	230	200	150	120
Premix (vitamins, minerals and amino acids)*	46	45	46	45
Grape pomace silage (GPS)	-	205	-	205
Nutritional composition (g/100g/DM)
Moisture**	12.00	34.00	12.00	34.00
Ash	2.45	3.66	2.04	3.26
Crude Protein	16.10	16.10	13.30	13.30
Ether extract	2.68	3.33	2.82	3.47
Neutral Detergent Fiber corrected for ash and protein (NDFap)	11.95	19.99	11.69	19.65
Acid Detergent Fiber corrected for ash (ADFa)	4.58	12.93	4.12	12.48
Non-fiber Carboydrates	66.82	56.92	70.45	60.32
Phenolic compounds (mg/g GAE)	0.64	12.92	0.43	13.25
Anthocyanins (mg/g malvidine 3-glycoside)	-	38.34	-	38.37
Fatty acid profile (g/100g fatty acid methyl esters)
C10:0	0.47	0.52	0.51	0.56
C12:0	1.02	0.95	1.12	1.05
C14:0	0.04	0.14	0.03	0.12
C16:0	17.54	16.62	17.47	16.55
C16:1n7	0.30	2.58	0.31	2.60
C18:0	3.24	3.37	3.16	3.29
C18:1n9	24.76	21.40	25.92	22.54
C18:2n6	45.01	42.95	44.26	42.20
C18:3n3	2.01	2.65	1.67	2.30
C20:0	0.49	0.50	0.53	0.54
C20:3n3	-	0.13	-	0.13
SFA	22.79	22.09	22.80	22.10
MUFA	25.06	23.98	26.23	25.14
PUFA	47.28	49.14	46.20	48.07
∑ n-6	45.27	48.56	44.54	47.84
∑ n-3	2.01	2.78	1.67	2.43

• *Minerals (Mg, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Se), Vitamins (A, B1, B2, B6, B12, D, K, Biotin (B3)), Amino Acids (Lysine, Methionine, Tryptophan, Histidine, Isoleucine, Leucine, Threonine, Valine, Arginin, Phenylalanine); **Natural basis; DM = dry matter; GAE = gallic acid equivalents; SFA (saturated fatty acids = C10:0; C12:0; C14:0; C16:0; C18:0; C20:0); MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acids = C16:1n7; C18:1n9); PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids = C18:2n6c; C18:3n6; C18:3n3; C20:3n3).

Animals, management, and experimental design

48 animals (24 castrated males and 24 females) from the crossing of F1 matrices (50% Large White x 50% Landrace) were used with EMBRAPA MS115 breeder, with an average age of 89.5 ± 2.15 days and average body weight of 28.81 ± 5.92 kg, were randomly distributed in six treatments: SYSCON: animals confined with conventional ration, SYSCON + GPS: confined animals receiving conventional ration with 20% grape pomace silage, SYSOUT A: free animals in an area provided with vegetation with conventional ration, SYSOUT A + GPS: free animals in an area provided with vegetation receiving conventional ration with 20% grape pomace silage, SYSOUT B: free animals without vegetation with conventional feed, SYSOUT B + GPS: free animals without vegetation receiving conventional ration with 20% grape pomace silage. The animals in the confined system were maintained in concrete stalls with a water depth of 1.2 m² per animal, while in the free-range system the animals had an area of ​​800 m²/animal, with 3 m²/animal covered area for shelter and rest, with free access to food and drinking water.

A completely randomized design was used, with eight animals per treatment, totaling 48 experimental units. Pigs, after an adaptation period of 10 days, were weighed, this weight was considered as the initial weight and the final weighing with 84 days of experiment when they were conducted to a water diet for 12 hours and then slaughtered according to humane slaughter standards. The animals were slaughtered with an average weight of 100.84 ± 13.24 kg. At slaughter, portions of the Longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle were collected, vacuum packed in film with low oxygen permeability, and stored at -18 ºC for later analysis.

Chemical composition, fatty acid profile, phenolic compounds and anthocyanins of the diets

The chemical composition of the main ingredients of the diets was carried out according to AOAC 2005 for moisture, ash or mineral matter (MM), crude protein (CP), and ether extract (EE). The fibrous fraction was determined as neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) according to Van Soest et al. 1991. NDF was obtained using thermostable α-amylase (Termamyl 120L, Novozymes Latin America LTDA) but without the addition of sodium sulfite, with a subsequent correction for ash and protein (NDFap) and ADF has been correted for ash (ADFa). The fraction of non-fibrous carbohydrates was obtained by difference, according to the equation: (NFC = 100 - (CP + EE + MM + NDFap)) (Table I).

The fatty acid profile, after extraction of the lipid fraction (Bligh & Dyer 1959) and respective esterification (Hartman & Lago 1973), was determined in a gas chromatography apparatus (Agilent model 6890N), equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) with capillary column DB-23 attached (length of 60 meters, internal diameter 0.25 mm and film thickness 0.25 μm). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL/min and a sample injection volume of 1 μL in 1/50 split mode, with an injection and detection temperature of 250 °C. Fatty acids were identified by comparing the retention period of previous determined methyl ester standards (Sigma: Supelco Mix 37) and the esterified samples.

The determination of phenolic compounds was performed by the method proposed by Zielinski & Kozłowska 2000, in a spectrophotometer model V-M5 (BEL Engeneering®), using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and gallic acid as standard. The results obtained were expressed as gallic acid equivalents in mg/100g of sample on a natural basis.

Anthocyanins were extracted according to Wu et al. 2004 and the purification of the content was performed according to Bochi et al. 2014 and Rodriguez-Saona et al. 2001. Anthocyanins were removed from the SPE with 0.35% methanol formic acid followed by evaporation of the solvent by rotary evaporator (10 min/38 ± 2 ° C). The contents were recovered with 2 ml of acidified ultrapure water (0.35% formic acid) and refrigerated in the absence of light. The determination of anthocyanin was performed on High Performance Liquid Cromatography (HPLC) (CBM-20A, LC-20AT, DGU-20A, model CTO-20A, Shimadzu, Columbia, MD, USA) with visible UV-28 detector (SPD-20AV, Shimadzu). The separation was carried out on a reverse phase C-18 Core-Shell Kinetex column (particle size of 2.6 µm, 100 mm, 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) at 38 °C using the chromatographic method described by Treptow et al. 2017. The elution and separation of the anthocyanins used acidified ultrapure water (3% formic acid) as mobile phase A and acetonitrile grade HPLC-UV as mobile phase B. The chromatograms analysis was performed with the aid of the LC solutions software (version 3, Shimadzu, Columbia, USA).

Proximal composition, fatty acid profile, and cholesterol of the meat

The moisture, ash, and protein determinations were performed according to AOAC 2005, in lyophilized samples (Terroni, LS3000B, BR) until constant pressure. The extraction and quantification of lipids were performed according to the technique proposed by Bligh & Dyer 1959 and the esterification and quantification of fatty acids according to Hartman & Lago 1973.

The fatty acid profile was determined in a Varian 3600 gas chromatograph (CA, USA) with flame ionization detector (GC-FID) and Varian 8100 automatic sampler (CA, USA). The injection volume was 1 µL in a split/splitless injector, operating in split mode, with a ratio of 20:1 to 250 °C. Hydrogen with a constant pressure of 35 psi was used as carrier gas. The column used was HP-88 (Agilent Technologies, USA) (100 m × 0.25 mm, 0.2 μm) with an initial temperature of 50 °C for 1 min, increasing to 185 °C at a rate of 15 °C min^-1, increasing again to 195 °C at a rate of 0.5 °C min^-1 and, finally, to 230 °C at 15 °C min^-1 remaining for 5 min. The detector was maintained at 250 °C. The identification was carried out by comparing the retention times of the FAME Mix 37 standards (P/N 47885-U, Supelco, USA). The results were expressed as a percentage of the total area of ​​the chromatograms and considering the FID correction factors and conversion of ester to acid, according to Visentainer 2012. Cholesterol levels were determined using an enzymatic method with a laboratory kit (VIDA Biotecnologia®, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) according to the methodology proposed by Saldanha et al. 2004.

Lipid oxidation and color evaluation

After the unfreeze process at 4 ºC, samples of meat from the LT muscle remained refrigerated with evaluations performed at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. Oxidative stability was achieved by determining substances reactive to thiobarbituric acid (TBARS) according to the method described by Raharjo et al. 1992. The results were calculated from a standard curve of 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane (TEP) (T9889, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA), and expressed in milligrams of malondialdehyde (MDA) per kg of sample. The objective evaluation of muscle color was performed using a Minolta spectrophotometer (model CM-700d, Konica Minolta, Japan) with illuminant A, included specular component (SCI) and 10º observer angle. For each repetition, eight evaluations were performed at different points, considering the values ​​of luminosity (L*), redness (a*), and yellow (b*). The total color difference (ΔE) was calculated, which aims to assess the color change in relation to the difference between the initial and final storage times (AMSA 2012). The calculation of the total color difference was performed using the following equation:

$$\Delta E=[(L^{\ast }-L_0^{\ast }{)}^{²}+(a^{\ast }-a_0^{\ast })+(b\ast -b_0^{\ast }{)}^{²}{]}^{½}$$

Where: L*₀, a*₀ e b*₀ are the sample values on the first day of storage.

pH24h, water losses, shear force, texture profile, and sensory analyses

The pH_24h postmortem was measured in the LT muscle, in the left side of the carcass, at the height of the 12^th rib, using a manual digital potentiometer (TESTO 205) equipped with a penetration probe thermometer. Samples of 2.5 cm thick from the LT muscle were evaluated. The samples were placed in polyethylene bags and frozen at -18 ºC until the analysis. The frozen samples were weighed and stored under refrigeration for 24 hours at 4 ºC during the unfreezing process. After 24 hours the samples were weighed, and the percentage of water loss was determined through the initial weight and final weight of the sample. To evaluate the loss of water in the cooking process, the muscle was weighed after thawing for 24 hours at 4 ºC and afterward, it was cooked on a grill until it reached an internal temperature of 71 ºC, as proposed by AMSA 2015 and quantified by weight difference between the unfrozen and cooked samples. From the cooked samples, the evaluation of shear force and texture profile was performed using a texturometer model TA. XT (Texture Analyzer TA. XT Plus, Stable MicroSystems®, United Kingdom). The shear force was performed by taking six samples in the longitudinal direction of the muscle fibers, with a diameter of 2.54 cm, using the Warner Bratzler Blade probe with a test speed of 3.30 mm/s and 30 mm. To determine the texture profile, the samples were cut into 1 cm³ cube and analyzed through the P36 probe, with a height of 36 mm, speed test of 5 mm/s, with double compression, with a speed pre-test of 1.5 mm/s and speed post-test of 10 mm/s. The attributes of hardness, elasticity, cohesiveness, chewability, and resilience were evaluated. The evaluation of sensory characteristics was performed through quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) (Stone & Sidel 2004), with a panel of 15 members, trained according to the AMSA 2015 guidelines, in four sessions. For each session, 12 samples of the LT muscle were served to the panelists (two steaks per pig, two pigs per treatment, six treatments per session). After the removal of subcutaneous fat, the steaks were prepared to 71 ºC of internal temperature and cut into cubes of 2.5 cm³. The samples were served individually to each member, under red light to avoid visual differences. Water and salt-free biscuits were prepared for the panelists to consume to clean the taste of the different samples. The evaluated attributes were succulence (1 = extremely dry to 7 = extremely juicy), initial tenderness (1 = extremely hard to 7 = extremely soft), global tenderness (1 = extremely hard to 7 = extremely soft), flavor (odor + flavor) (1 = extremely weak to 7 = extremely intense), and off-flavor (0 + no off-flavor at 8 = extremely intense).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed as 3 × 2 factorial design using the general linear model procedure of RStudio® statistical program (R Core Team 2018), with ExpDes, MASS, lsmeans, multcompView packages. Animal was the experimental unit for all analysis. The model included fixed effects of production systems (S), GPS-feed (F) treatment and the interaction between them (S*F). The random terms were pen and experimental error. The effect of the animal genre was studied, but since it did not significantly influence responses, it was excluded from the model. The residuals were checked for the assumptions of normality of the error distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test (p > 0.05) and homogeneity of variances by the Bartlett test (p > 0.05). The variables with disagreement of the assumptions of normality and homogeneity were transformed by the methodology of Box & Cox 1964. When P values of were < 0.05, differences among the treatments were examined by one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s test. Data were expressed as means ± SEM.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Proximal composition, fatty acid profile, and cholesterol

The results showed no interaction effect between the production and feeding system and there were no significant differences in the proximal composition (Table II), fatty acid profile (Table III) and cholesterol levels (Table II) in the meat produced. Experiments with grape pomace in swine feed are scarce especially as silage. For comparative purposes, Trombetta et al. 2019 evaluated the use of GPS, at the levels of 3.5 and 7.0% on a dry basis, associated with flaxseed oil, obtaining results similar to this study according to the effects of grape pomace, in spite of the highest level employed. Thus, it can be observed that even the level of 20% of GPS in the pig diets based on corn and soybean meal does not change the proximal composition and the cholesterol content, as well as the fatty acid profile, of the meat produced.

Table II
Proximal composition, cholesterol, pH 24h, water loss, texture profile, and shear force of pig meat in different production systems supplemented with GPS.

	Treatments
	System (S)			GPS-Feed (F)			p-value
Parameters	SYSCON	SYSOUT A	SYSOUT B	Without	With	SEM	S	F	S*F
1Moisture	73.36	73.47	73.49	73.40	73.49	0.120	0.898	0.733	0.671
1Ashes	1.23	1.25	1.19	1.21	1.24	0.011	0.092	0.295	0.580
1Crude protein	23.13	23.12	22.87	23.00	23.09	0.110	0.566	0.722	0.518
1Lipids	1.70	1.69	1.87	1.79	1.71	0.041	0.129	0.323	0.097
2Cholesterol	58.90	54.93	53.03	56.25	54.99	1.17	0.110	0.579	0.181
ph24h	5.53b	5.64ab	5.76a	5.63	5.66	0.03	0.014	0.636	0.172
1DL	8.57b	9.18ab	12.61a	9.50	10.74	0.669	0.027	0.314	0.650
1CL	25.70	26.50	25.55	26.13	25.71	0.584	0.789	0.732	0.697
3SF	25,79a	28,53b	25,49a	27,65	26,08	0.049	0.012	0.183	0.518
3Hardness	174.52	145.06	149.39	176.50a	136.15b	8.477	0.282	0.017	0.852
1Elasticity	0.58	0.57	0.55	0.59	0.56	0.006	0.943	0.569	0.125
Cohesiveness	0.54	0.56	0.54	0.54	0.55	0.004	0.194	0.236	0.204
Chewability	53.70	43.47	46.95	52.69a	43.39b	2.341	0.169	0.041	0.330
1Resilience	0.22	0.23	0.21	0.22	0.22	0.004	0.486	0.751	0.713

• Means followed by different letters on the same line are statistically different (p <0.05); SYSCON (confined animals); SYSOUT A (free-range animals); SYSOUT B (free animals without pasture); GPS-feed (conventional feed without or with GPS); SEM (standard error of mean); S*F (system x feed interaction); DL (drip loss); CL (cooking loss); ¹values expressed as a percentage; ²values expressed in mg/100g of sample; SF (shear force); ³value expressed in Newton (N).

Table III
Longissimus thoracis (LT) fatty acid profile of pigs in different production systems supplemented with GPS.

¹Fatty acids	Treatments						p-value
	System (S)			GPS-feed (F)
	SYSCON	SYSOUT A	SYSOUT B	Without	With	SEM	S	F	S*F
C10:0	0.06	0.07	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.011	0.149	0.640	0.137
C12:0	0.05	0.06	0.06	0.05	0.06	0.010	0.194	0.463	0.740
C14:0	1.03	1.05	1.03	1.04	1.05	0.055	0.487	0.764	0.938
C15:0	0.07	0.08	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.008	0.909	0.400	0.255
C16:0	27.10	27.24	27.64	27.17	27.42	0.181	0.320	0.473	0.111
C16:1n7	2.64	2.53	2.73	2.71	2.55	0.068	0.518	0.288	0.601
C17:0	0.24	0.24	0.20	0.22	0.23	0.011	0.135	0.665	0.347
C17:1n7	0.35	0.33	0.39	0.36	0.35	0.018	0.408	0.768	0.344
C18:0	13.64	13.27	13.23	13.25	13.74	0.184	0.601	0.584	0.474
C18:1n9c	42.97	42.21	43.23	42.66	42.15	0.568	0.253	0.661	0.707
C18:2n6c	7.72	7.56	7.75	7.76	7.53	0.160	0.731	0.487	0.314
C20:0	0.20	0.23	0.22	0.21	0.22	0.006	0.093	0.483	0.439
C18:3n6	0.07	0.08	0.08	0.08	0.07	0.007	0.803	0.427	0.464
C18:3n3	0.21	0.24	0.22	0.22	0.24	0.007	0.073	0.079	0.694
C20:1n9	0.75	0.76	0.72	0.74	0.73	0.019	0.413	0.884	0.909
C20:2n6	0.24	0.24	0.22	0.23	0.24	0.005	0.132	0.592	0.652
C20:3n6	0.21	0.21	0.20	0.21	0.21	0.007	0.829	0.781	0.122
C22:1n9	0.04	0.05	0.04	0.05	0.05	0.001	0.061	0.599	0.517
C20:4n6	1.15	1.10	1.11	1.14	1.10	0.041	0.867	0.563	0.145
C20:5n3	0.03	0.04	0.04	0.03	0.04	0.002	0.284	0.780	0.845
C24:1n9	0.29	0.26	0.25	0.29	0.25	0.011	0.215	0.081	0.710
C22:6n3	0.04	0.03	0.04	0.03	0.03	0.001	0.186	0.792	0.197
SFA	42.39	42.24	42.54	42.10	42.86	0.189	0.189	0.096	0.969
MUFA	47.04	46.14	47.36	46.81	46.08	0.412	0.463	0.682	0.936
PUFA	9.66	9.50	9.66	9.70	9.46	0.291	0.361	0.775	0.681
PUFA/SFA	0.23	0.22	0.23	0.23	0.22	0.004	0.180	0.582	0.323
∑ n-6	9.39	9.19	9.36	9.42	9.15	0.244	0.734	0.562	0.993
∑ n-3	0.28	0.31	0.30	0.28	0.31	0.006	0.820	0.371	0.644
∑ n-6/n-3	33.53	29.65	31.20	33.64	29.51	1.363	0.579	0.749	0.696

• ¹values expressed as a percentage of the total area of the chromatograms; Values of p> 0.05 do not differ at the 5% level of significance. SYSCON (confined animals); SYSOUT A (free-range animals); SYSOUT B (free animals without pasture); GPS-Feed (conventional feed without or with GPS); SEM (standard error of mean); S*F (system x feed interaction). SFA (saturated fatty acids = C10:0; C14:0; C15:0; C16:0; C17:0; C18:0; C20:0); MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acids = C16:1n7; C17:1n7; C18:1n9; C20:1n9; C22:1n9; C24:1n9); PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acids = C18:2n6c; C18:3n6; C18:3n3; C20:3n6; C20:5n3; C22:6n3).

Yan & Kim 2011 when adding 3% and 10% of fermented grape pomace to the feed of confined pigs found alterations in the fatty acid profile in the subcutaneous fat specifically, not observing differences in the Longissimus muscle. Trombetta et al. 2019 when adding flaxseed oil and grape pomace silage to confined pigs, did not observe any alterations in the fatty acid profile concerning to grape pomace supplementation. The results can be explained by the relatively low participation of the grape pomace lipid fraction (6.13 x 0.20 = 1.23%) in the diets and by the relative similarity in the fatty acid profile in relation to the main ingredients (corn and soybean meal) used in experimental diets.

Lipid oxidation and color evaluation

The results showed linear behavior (p < 0.05) in the analysis of TBARS (Figure 1), where the values ​​increased during storage in all treatments, showing lipid oxidation. However, the treatments with the inclusion of GPS showed the lowest TBARS values ​​during storage, showing less lipid oxidation in meats. It was observed that during storage, the SYSOUT B treatment showed the highest TBARS values, indicating higher oxidation. Ahmad & Srivastava 2007 reported that TBARS values ​​between 0.5 and 1.0 mg of MDA/kg of meat samples do not make it possible to identify the odor. Nevertheless, the authors reported that values ​​between 1 and 2 mg of MDA/kg of sample stimulated the sensory detection of lipid oxidation. The TBARS values established during the nine days of evaluation were below 1 mg. However, after 12 days of storage, the values ​​were approximately 1 and 1.8 mg of MDA/kg of sample, indicating the lipid oxidation, which could cause damage to the consumer health.

Figure 1
Oxidative stability of GPS-fed pig meat in different production systems during refrigerated storage: (○) SYSCON, (●) SYSCON + GPS, (♦) SYSOUT A, (×) SYSOUT A + GPS, (◊) SYSOUT B, (▲) SYSOUT B + GPS.

The inclusion of GPS was able to reduce lipid oxidation until the ninth day of cold storage, regardless of the production system, whose effects can be attributes to the compounds with the antioxidant activity present in the GPS as shown in Table I, the inclusion of GPS in diet of pigs provided increased in phenolic compounds (13 mg/g GAE) and anthocyanins (38 mg/g malvidine 3-glycoside).

Yan & Kim 2011 evaluated the supplementation of 3% and 10% fermented grape pomace in confined pigs and observed TBARS values ​​of 0.049 mg MDA/kg in the control diet, 0.026 mg MDA/kg with 3% grape pomace and 0.09 mg MDA/kg with 10% grape pomace, with a reduction in lipid oxidation. The main phenolic compounds present in grape pomace are catechins, epicatechins, gallic acid, and other phenolic acids (Lafka et al. 2007). The results indicated that GPS is an important source of antioxidants with the potential for use in pig feed, constituting an alternative to increasing the meat shelf life.

The instrumental color analysis (Figure 2) indicated a decreasing linear behavior (p < 0.05) for the values ​​of L* (luminosity) and a* (redness). It is possible to observe that, initially, the values ​​of L* are lower for the groups fed with GPS and that the values ​​of a* are higher in these groups, indicating a high intensity of the red color in these meats (AMSA 2012). According to the American Meat Science Association (AMSA 2001), L* values ​​between 49 and 60 are related to the quality standards of pigs, demonstrating that the meat was conforming to the standards considered normal for the species.

Figure 2
Effect of inclusion of grape pomace (GPS) and the production system on the parameters of L* (a), a* (b), b* (c), and ΔE (d) in pigs during refrigerated storage: (○) SYSCON, (●) SYSCON + GPS, (♦) SYSOUT A, (×) SYSOUT A + GPS, (◊) SYSOUT B, (▲) SYSOUT B + GPS.

The higher intensity of the red color in the groups fed with GPS may be due to the phenolic compounds in the diets with grape pomace, preventing the myoglobin oxidation. Yan & Kim 2011 and Bertol et al. 2017 also observed an increase in the redness of pigs meat fed with grape pomace extract and dehydrated grape residue, respectively. Increasing linear behavior (p < 0.05) is observed for the values ​​of b* (yellow). The treatments SYSCON and SYSOUT B indicated a higher content of b* during storage. The higher b* value in meat indicates the formation of metmyoglobin (AMSA 2012). According to Rodríguez et al. 2007 the reduction in the red color is associated with the oxidation rate of oxymyoglobin to metmyoglobin. The color difference (ΔE), calculated in relation to the zero-day of cold storage (Figure 2 (d)) showed an increasing linear behavior (p < 0.05), representing a global change in color over time. According to Heck et al. 2019, ΔE values ​​above 2 are noticeable by consumers. The animals fed with GPS showed a lower value of ΔE up to the sixth day of storage. At nine and 12 days, the treatments SYSCON and SYSOUT B demonstrated the highest values ​​compared to the other treatments, probably since the animals did not consume GPS. At 12 days, all values ​​exceeded the limit, with the discoloration noticeable to human vision. Substances such as anthocyanins and phenolic acids increase resistance to oxidizing agents and improve color stability (Pieszka et al. 2017), confirmed by this study, where the phenolic compounds present in GPS provided beneficial effects on the color and oxidative stabilities of pig meat.

pH_24h, water loss, shear force, texture profile, and sensory analyses

There was no interaction between the production system and feeding in the evaluated attributes. However, there was an effect of the production system on the percentage of water loss during thawing, which was higher in the SYSOUT B treatment (free range animals). Differences in the water loss on thawing may be related to different parameters affected by the production system, such as, the pH_24h value (Gandemer et al. 1990, López & Carballo 1991), confirmed by this study in which the final pH value was also higher in the SYSOUT B treatment. Other authors have also connected the pH_24h value with water loss (Monin 1991, Santos-Silva & Portugal 2001). The cooking losses did not show significant differences. Similar results were noticed by Tejerina et al. 2012, in which it was evaluated the water retention and loss capacity in pigs in different production systems.

According to the shear force test, there was a significant difference for the production system, with the highest average in the SYSOUT A treatment. The SYSCON and SYSOUT B treatments showed no differences (Table II). Enfält et al. 1997 observed that the shear force was higher in the meat of pigs raised in free-range. Tejerina et al. 2012 also observed higher shear force in animals raised in free-range, corroborating with this study. For the analysis of the texture profile (Table II), the attributes of hardness and chewability showed a significant difference in the diet, when the animals fed with GPS showed lower values, characterizing a soft meat. This result is confirmed by the sensory analysis since the members considered higher tenderness for this meat. There was no effect of the production system for the attributes evaluated in the texture profile, nor interaction. Lopez-Bote et al. 2008 also indicated no differences in texture attributes in pigs submitted to exercise and confinement. Sensory analysis (Table IV) showed no interaction between production system and feeding, but revealed a significant effect on feeding for the attribute initial tenderness and overall tenderness when the animals fed with GPS showed higher values. Results confirmed by the analysis of the texture profile since the less hard and chewable meat was considered tender by the sensory evaluation. The other attributes did not present effects of production, feeding, and interaction system. Trombetta et al. 2019 when adding GPS to the pig feed, did not detect significant differences in the sensory attributes, possibly due to the reduced level of supplementation (3.5 and 7.0%).

Table IV
Sensory analysis of pig meat in different production systems supplemented with GPS.

Attributes	Treatments						p-value
	System (S)			GPS-feed (F)
	SYSCON	SYSOUT A	SYSOUT B	Without	With	SEM	S	F	S*F
Juiciness	4.17	3.97	4.37	3.98	4.36	0.130	0.460	0.151	0.487
Initial tenderness	5.25	4.83	5.17	4.89b	5.28a	0.108	0.196	0.005	0.063
Global ternderness	5.0	4.90	4.80	4.67b	5.14a	0.110	0.742	0.031	0.069
Meat flavor	3.87	3.77	3.97	3.80	3.94	0.124	0.812	0.599	0.409
Off-flavor	0.64	0.60	0.80	0.69	0.67	0.122	0.782	0.929	0.562

• Means followed by different letters on the same line are statistically different (p <0.05); SYSCON (confined animals); SYSOUT A (free-range animals); SYSOUT B (free animals without pasture); GPS-Feed (conventional feed without or with GPS); SEM (standard error of mean); S*F (system x feed interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

The grape pomace conserved as silage when used for growing-finishing swine diet, does not alter the proximal composition, cholesterol content, fatty acid profile, juiciness, and flavor of meat. Additionally, it promotes improvement in pork quality, such as greater objective and subjective tenderness, higher red color intensity, and retarded the lipid oxidation, regardless of the production system, constituting a sustainable alternative for a waste that needs to be reused.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) [grant number 001], for providing financial support for this work.

REFERENCES

• AHMAD S & SRIVASTAVA PK. 2007. Quality and shelf life evaluation of fermented sausages of buffalo meat with different levels of heart and fat. Meat Sci 75: 603-609.
• ALONSO ME, GONZÁLEZ-MONTAÑA JR & LOMILLOS JM. 2020. Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 10: 1-13.
• AMSA. 2001. Meat evaluation handbook. Savoy: American Meat Science Association, p. 83-116.
• AMSA. 2012. Meat Color Measurement Guidelines. Champaing: American Meat Science Association, 136 p.
• AMSA. 2015. Research guidelines for cookery, sensory evaluation and instrumental tenderness measurements of meat. American Meat Science Association, 105 p.
• AOAC. 2005. Official methods of analysis, 18ª ed., Gaithersburg, Maryland.
• BERES C, COSTA GNS, CABEZUDO I, SILVA-JAMES NK, TELES ASC, CRUZ APG, MELLINGER-SILVA C, TONON RV, CABRAL LMC & FREITAS SP. 2017. Towards integral utilization of grape pomace from winemaking process: a review. J Waste Manag 68: 581-594.
• BERTOL TM, CAMPOS RML, LUDTKE JV, TERRA NN, FIGUEIREDO EAP, COLDEBELLA A, SANTOS FILHO JI, KAWSKI VL & LEHR NM. 2013. Effects of genotype and dietary oil supplementation on performance, carcass traits, pork quality and fatty acid composition of backfat and intramuscular fat. Meat Sci 93: 507-516.
• BERTOL TM, LUDKE JV, CAMPOS RML, KAWSKI VL, CUNHA JR A & FIGUEIREDO EAP. 2017. Inclusion of grape pomace in the diet of pigs on pork quality and oxidative stability of omega-3 enriched fat. Cienc Rural 47: 1-7.
• BLIGH EG & DYER WJ. 1959. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911-917.
• BOCHI VC, BARCIA MT, RODRIGUES D, SPERONI CS, GIUSTI MM & GODOY HT. 2014. Polyphenol extraction optimisation from Ceylon gooseberry (Dovyalis hebecarpa) pulp. Food Chem 164: 347-354.
• BOX GEP & COX DR. 1964. Ananalysis of transformations. J R Stat Soc 26: 211-252.
• ENFÄLT AC, LUNDSTRÖM K, HANSSON I, LUNDEHEIM N & NYSTRÖM PE. 1997. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Sci 45: 1-15.
• FRANCISCO A ET AL. 2015. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality of lambs supplemented with increasing levels of a tanniferous bush (Cistus ladanifer L.) and vegetable oils. Meat Sci 100: 275-282.
• GANDEMER G, BONNOT D, VEDRENNE P, CARITEZ JC, BERGE P, BRIANT E & LEGAULT C. 1990. Influence du system d’elevageet du genotype sur la composition chimique et les qualities organoleptiques du muscle long dorsal chez le porc. J Rech Porcine 22: 101-110.
• HARTMAN L & LAGO RC. 1973. Rapid preparation of fatty acid methyl esters from lipids. Lab Pract 22: 475-476.
• HECK RT, SALDAÑA E, LORENZO JM, CORREA LP, FAGUNDES MB, CICHOSKI AJ, MENEZES CR, WAGNER R & CAMPAGNOL PCB. 2019. Hydrogelled emulsion from chia and linseed oils: A promising strategy to produce low-fat burgers with a healthier lipid profile. Meat Sci 156: 174-182.
• KOTSAMPASI B, CHRISTODOULOU V, ZOTOS A, LIAKOPOULOU-KYRIAKIDES M, GOULAS P, PETROTOS K, NATAS P & BAMPIDIS VA. 2014. Effects of dietary pomegranate byproduct silage supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of growing lambs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 197: 92-102.
• LAFKA TL, SINANOGLOU V & LAZOS ES. 2007. On the extraction and antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds from winery wastes. Food Chem 104: 1206-1214.
• LOPEZ-BOTE CJ, TOLDRÁ F, DAZA A, FERRER JM, MENOYO D, SILIÓ L & RODRÍGUEZ MC. 2008. Effect of exercise on skeletal muscle proteolytic enzyme activity and meat quality characteristics in Iberian pigs. Meat Sci 79: 71-76.
• LÓPEZ G & CARBALLO BM. 1991. Manual de Bioquímica y tecnología de la carne. Madrid: Vicente A (Ed), 171, Madrid.
• MONIN G. 1991. Facteurs biologiques des qualités de la viande bovine. INRA Productions Animales, Paris: INRA, p. 151-160.
• PERRA M, BACCHETTA G, MUNTONI A, GIOANNIS G, CASTANGIA I, RAJHA HN, MANCA ML & MANCONI M. 2022. An outlook on modern and sustainable approaches to the management of grape pomace by integrating green processes, biotechnologies and advanced biomedical approaches. J Funct Foods 98: 1-10.
• PIESZKA M, SZCZUREK P, BEDERSKA-ŁOJEWSKA D, MIGDAŁ W, PIESZKA M, GODOL P & JAGUSIAK W. 2017. The effect of dietary supplementation with dried fruit and vegetable pomaces on production parameters and meat quality in fattening pigs. Meat Sci 126: 1-10.
• R CORE TEAM. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
• RAHARJO S, SOFOS JN & SCHMIDT GR. 1992. Improved speed, specificity, and limit of determination of anaqueous acid extraction thiobarbituric acid-C18 method for measuring lipid peroxidation in beef. J Agric Food Chem 40: 2182-2185.
• RODRÍGUEZ A, BATLLE R & NERÍN C. 2007. The use of natural essential oils as antimicrobial solutions in paper packaging. Part II. Prog Org Coat 60: 33-38.
• RODRIGUEZ-SAONA LE, GIUSTI MM, DURST RW & WROLSTAD RE. 2001. Development and process optimization of red radish concentrate extract as potential natural red colorant. J Food Process Preserv 25: 165-182.
• ROSTAGNO HS, ALBINO LFT, DONZELE JL, GOMES PC, OLIVEIRA RF, LOPES DC, FERREIRA AS & BARRETO SLT. 2005. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. Viçosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, p. 1-186.
• SALAMI SA, LUCIANO G, O’GRADY MN, BIONDI L, NEWBOLD CJ, KERRY JP & PRIOLO A. 2019. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 251: 37-55.
• SALDANHA T, MAZALLI MR & BRAGAGNOLO N. 2004. Comparative evaluation between two methods for determining cholesterol in meat and milk. Food Sci Technol 24: 109-113.
• SANTOS-SILVA J & PORTUGAL AV. 2001. The effect of weight on carcass and meat quality of Serra da Estrela and Merino Branco lambs fattened with dehydrated lucerne. Anim Res 50: 289-298.
• SIROHI R, TARAFDAR A, SINGH S, NEGI T, GAUR VK, GNANSOUNOU E & BHARATHIRAJA B. 2020. Green processing and biotechnological potential of grape pomace: Current trends and opportunities for sustainable biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 314: 1-14.
• SONG OY, ISLAM MA, SON JH, JEONG JY, KIM HE, YEON LS, KHAN N, JAMILA N & KIM KS. 2021. Elemental composition of pork meat from conventional and animal welfare farms by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) and ICP-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and their authentication via multivariate chemometric analysis. Meat Sci 172: 1-8.
• STONE H & SIDEL JL. 2004. Sensory evaluation practices. (3ª ed.) New York: Academic.
• TEJERINA D, GARCÍA-TORRES S & CAVA R. 2012. Water-holding capacity and instrumental texture properties of m. Longissimus dorsi and m. Serratus ventralis from Iberian pigs as affected by the production system. Livest Sci 148: 46-51.
• THERKILDSEN M, JENSEN SK & KONGSTED AG. 2021. Crossbreed and feed allowance affect final meat and eating quality of pigs from a free-range system. Livest Sci 250: 1-10.
• TREPTOW TC, COMARELLA CG, FRANCO FW, RODRIGUES E, DOMINGUES F, BOCHI VC & SAUTTER CK. 2017. Thermal Pest Control in ‘Tannat’ grapes: Effect on anthocyanins, sensory and color of one-year-old wines. Food Res Int 100: 113-121.
• TROMBETTA F, FRUET APB, STEFANELLO FS, FONSECA PAF, SOUZA ANM, TONETTO CJ, ROSADO JÚNIOR AG & NÖRNBERG JL. 2019. Effects of the dietary inclusion of linseed oil and grape pomace on weight gain, carcass characteristics and meat quality in swine. Int Food Res J 26: 1741-1749.
• VAN SOEST PJ, ROBERTSON JB & LEWIS BA. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Int J Dairy Sci 74: 3583-3597.
• VISENTAINER JV. 2012. Aspectos analíticos da resposta do detector de ionização em chama para ésteres de ácidos graxos em biodiesel e alimentos. Quim Nova 35: 274-279.
• WU X, GU L, PRIOR RL & MCKAY S. 2004. Characterization of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in some cultivars of ribes, aronia, and sambucus and their antioxidant capacity. J Agric Food Chem 52: 7846-7856.
• YAN L & KIM I. 2011. Effect of dietary grape pomace fermented by Saccharomyces boulardii on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality in finishing pigs. Anim Sci J 24: 1763-1770.
• YU J & AHMEDNA M. 2013. Functional components of grape pomace: their composition, biological properties and potential applications. Int J Food Sci Technol 48: 221-237.
• ZHANG C, LUO J, YU B, ZHENG P, HUANG Z, MAO X, HE J, YU J, CHEN J & CHEN D. 2015. Dietary resveratrol supplementation improves meat quality of finishing pigs through changing muscle fiber characteristics and antioxidative status. Meat Sci 102: 15-21.
• ZIELINSKI H & KOZŁOWSKA H. 2000. Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected cereal grains and their different morphological fractions. J Agric Food Chem 48: 2008-2016.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Mar 2024
• Date of issue
  2024

History

• Received
  25 July 2022
• Accepted
  9 July 2023