Open-access Whole-genome sequencing of Leptospira interrogans from southern Brazil: genetic features of a highly virulent strain

Abstract

BACKGROUND  Leptospirosis is the most widespread zoonotic disease. It is caused by infection with pathogenic Leptospira species, of which over 300 serovars have been described. The accurate identification of the causative Leptospira spp. is required to ascertain the pathogenic status of the local isolates.

OBJECTIVES  This study aimed to obtain the complete genome sequence of a virulent Leptospira interrogans strain isolated from southern Brazil and to describe its genetic features.

METHODS  The whole genome was sequenced by next-generation sequencing (Ion Torrent). The genome was assembled, scaffolded, annotated, and manually reviewed. Mutations were identified based on a variant calling analysis using the genome of L. interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130 as a reference.

FINDINGS  The entire genome had an average GC content of 35%. The variant calling analysis identified 119 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), from which 30 led to a missense mutation. The structural analyses identified potential evidence of genomic inversions, translocations, and deletions in both the chromosomes.

MAIN CONCLUSIONS  The genome properties provide comprehensive information about the local isolates of Leptospira spp., and thereby, could facilitate the identification of new targets for the development of diagnostic kits and vaccines.

Key words: leptospirosis; genomics; bioinformatics; next-generation sequencing; Leptospira interrogans; zoonosis; phylogenetic analysis; whole-genome sequencing


Leptospirosis, a zoonotic disease, is caused by infection with pathogenic bacteria belonging to the genus Leptospira, and occurs worldwide. Susceptible hosts can be infected by direct contact with the urine of infected animals or through indirect exposure to leptospires in contaminated soil or water (Adler & Moctezuma 2010). The genus Leptospira comprises of twenty-two different species isolated from distinct hosts and environments, including ten pathogenic species (L. interrogans, L. kirschneri, L. borgpetersenii, L. santarosai, L. noguchii, L. weilii, L. alexanderi, L. kmetyi, L. alstonii, and L. mayottensis); five intermediate species (L. inadai, L. broomii, L. fainei, L. wolffii, and L. licerasiae); and seven saprophytic species (L. biflexa, L. wolbachii, L. meyeri, L. vanthielii, L. terpstrae, L. idonii, and L. yanagawae) (Bourhy et al. 2014). Pathogenic and intermediate species have been isolated from humans and animals and may be the cause of various mild clinical manifestations, while saprophytic species, which are environmental bacteria, do not cause the disease in humans or animals (Adler & Moctezuma 2010).

The genome of Leptospira spp. consists of two circular chromosomes that have a cumulative length that ranges from 3.9 to 4.6 Mb, a variation larger than that observed in other spirochaetes. This variability in the genome length confers the bacteria with an ability to live within diverse environments and to adapt to a wide range of hosts (Picardeau et al. 2008). However, detailed knowledge and understanding about the molecular pathogenesis and virulence evolution of Leptospira spp. is still unavailable (Xu et al. 2016). Next-generation DNA sequencing technology has been widely employed to perform several comparative analyses of gene diversity between saprophytic and pathogenic leptospires (Picardeau et al. 2008) and between different species of pathogenic leptospires (Xu et al. 2016). Sequencing new Leptospira isolates from various global sources generates additional data that can facilitate a better understanding about this pathogen.

L. interrogans isolate Piscina has previously been obtained from an abandoned swimming pool in southern Brazil. Our group characterised this isolate and found that it was highly virulent in the hamster model, causing lesions that are typically associated with severe leptospirosis, with an LD50 of ~2 leptospires. This indicated that L. interrogans Piscina may pose a risk to public health in the region (Forster et al. 2013). Due to its high virulence, this isolate has also been used as a challenge strain in experiments aimed to evaluate the protection afforded by novel recombinant vaccine candidates against leptospirosis in vaccinology laboratories (Forster et al. 2015).

In the present study, we performed the whole-genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation of L. interrogans strain Piscina in combination with functional and structural analyses. These genome features provide a deeper understanding about the pathogenesis of Piscina and may facilitate future improvements in its diagnosis and prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Leptospira sp. isolation and genomic DNA extraction - Leptospira sp. was isolated from a water sample collected from an abandoned swimming pool in southern Brazil that contained dead rats, as previously described (Forster et al. 2013). Ten millilitres culture grown for seven days in Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris (EMJH) medium was inactivated in a water bath at 56°C for 30 min and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 5 min. DNA was extracted using Illustra Bacterium Genomic Prep Mini Spin kit following the manufacturer's instructions (GE Healthcare, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). The extracted DNA was analysed by agarose gel electrophoresis to evaluate its integrity and quality, and subsequently was stored at -20°C.

Whole-genome sequencing - Bacterial genome sequencing was performed using the Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies, Saint Aubin, France) and 100 ng DNA. The DNA library was constructed using enzymatic fragmentation and adaptor ligation with the Ion Xpress Plus fragment library kit (Life Technologies). Fragment size selection was performed using E-Gel® SizeSelect 2% (Invitrogen). After diluting the library at 100 pM, template preparation, emulsion polymerase chain reaction, and ion sphere particle (ISP) enrichment were performed using the Ion One Touch template kit (Life Technologies). The ISPs were loaded and sequenced on a 318 chip (Life Technologies).

Genome assembly and annotation - De novo genome assembly was generated by MIRA (http://www.chevreux.org), Newbler (http://www.454.com/), and SPAdes (Bankevich et al. 2012), and their results were merged by CISA (Lin & Liao 2013) to generate a consensus assembly. The scaffolds of each chromosome were separated using BLAST searches against the genome of L. interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130 (GenBank: AE016823.1, AE016824.1) and ordered using CAR (Lu et al. 2014) based on this same reference genome. Assembly gaps were closed using GMCloser (Kosugi et al. 2015), FGAP (Piro et al. 2014), and manual curation with the CLC Genome Workbench (http://www.clcbio.com). Genome annotation was performed using Genix (Kremer et al. 2016a) and manually reviewed using Artemis (Rutherford et al. 2000).

In silico multilocus sequence typing (MLST), variant calling analysis, and structural analysis - An in silico MLST analysis was performed using BLASTn searches against a database of alleles of the seven housekeeping genes from the scheme described by Boonsilp et al. (2013). All allele and sequence type data were downloaded from the PubMLST repository (http://pubmlst.org/).

To identify base-scale mutations, such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a variant calling analysis was performed. The filtered sequencing reads were aligned to the reference genome of L. interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130 using Segemehl (http://www.bioinf.unileipzig.de/Software/segemehl/) and an initial identification of INDELs was performed using SAMtools and BCFtools (https://github.com/samtools), which were processed locally and re-aligned using GATk (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/) to improve the reliability of the alignments in the read mapping file. Finally, a new variant calling was performed using BCFtools, which was based on the refined mapping. SnpEff was used to predict the effect of each mutation (Cingolani et al. 2012).

During the final assembly, the genome of L. interrogans strain Piscina was aligned to the genome of L. interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130 using Artemis Comparison Tool (ACT) (Rutherford et al. 2000) to identify structural variations (e.g., translocations, large insertions/deletions, inversions). To understand the plasticity of the L. interrogans genome, it was also compared to three other strains of L. interrogans - RCA, Prea, and Capivara - from the same sequence type (ST:17), which were reported by our group in a previous study (Kremer et al. 2016b). These strains were obtained from different mammal maintenance hosts in Pelotas, southern Brazil. As these genome sequences were published as draft genomes, the same reference-guided contig-ordering process employed for Piscina was used to reconstruct their chromosome structure.

Phylogenetic analysis - Mugsy (Angiuoli & Salzberg 2011) was used to identify syntenic regions shared between the genome of strain Piscina; draft genomes of the L. interrogans strains RCA, Prea, Capivara, and Aceguá that we have previously described (Kremer et al. 2016b); and the finished genomes of L. interrogans (nearest phylogenetic relatives) (Supplementary data, Table I) already available at GenBank. The regions present in all genomes were selected and merged into a single alignment, which was processed by the tools “TreeConstruction.Distance-Calculator” and “TreeConstruction.DistanceTreeConstructor” from the Phylo module from the Biopython package (http://biopython.org/) to generate a neighbour-joining tree, which was plotted using the interactive tree of life server (http://itol.embl.de/).

RESULTS

Genome properties - The whole-genome shotgun sequencing of Piscina resulted in 689,451 reads with mean Phred score (Q) > 20, which represented coverage of ~30× when an L. interrogans genome of ~4.60 Mb, such as that of the Fiocruz L1-130 strain, was considered. The final assembly of chromosome I (4.22 Mb) contained 35 gaps and 3,318 predicted genes, while chromosome II (0.36 Mb) contained 2 gaps and 285 predicted genes. The lack of coverage in some regions may be a consequence of the drawbacks associated with de novo genome assembly from short reads NGS data, the presence of repetitive DNA elements and transposases, and the existence of regions in the genome with large variations in the CG content that may be over- or under-fragmented during the library construction. The entire genome had an average GC content of 35%. An overview of the results of the genome annotation is displayed in Table I and a deeper description of riboswitch-regulated genes is showed in Table II.

TABLE I
Overview of the results from the genome annotation for the genome of Leptospira interrogans strain Piscina
TABLE II
Riboswitch-regulated genes identified in the genome of Leptospira interrogans strain Piscina

Identification of pathogenesis-related genes of the Piscina isolate - The annotation results indicated the presence of genes associated with virulence, such as those encoding sphingomyelinases, leptospiral immunoglobulin-like (Lig) proteins and conserved surface-exposed proteins (LipL32, LipL41, LipL21, and Loa22) that are only found in pathogenic leptospires. The landscape of pathogenesis-related genesis is presented in Supplementary data, Table II.

In silico MLST profiling - The results of the in silico MLST analysis are presented in Table III. As demonstrated by the combination of alleles, the Piscina isolate belongs to the ST 17 of the MLST scheme 1, which comprises the serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae and Copenhageni.

Identification of SNPs - The variant calling analysis identified 119 SNPs, of which 30 had Q ≥ 40 and led to a missense mutation in comparison to that of the L. interrogans Fiocruz L1-130 reference genome. As demonstrated by the variant calling analysis (Table IV), the most mutated loci were LIC_11095 and LIC_13379, which contained six and four missense SNPs, respectively.

Comparative sequence analysis and phylogenetics - The structural comparison generated by ACT based on the L. interrogans serovar strain Fiocruz L1-130 reference genome is presented in Fig. 1. All contigs were mapped to one of the two chromosomes, and no extrachromosomal element was identified (e.g., phage, plasmid). The structural analysis facilitated the identification of some potential events of genomic inversions, translocations, and deletions in both the chromosomes. The phylogenetic analysis performed based on alignment of the syntenic regions confirmed that L. interrogans serovar strain Fiocruz L1-130 and Piscina isolate belong to the same pathogenic group as portrayed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1
the genome structure reorganisation analysis generated by Artemis Comparison Tool (ACT), using the genome of Leptospira interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130 as a reference, for the genome of the strains (A) Piscina, (B) Capivara, (C) Prea, and (D) RCA.
Fig. 2
the findings from the neighbour-joining tree constructed based on the multiple alignment of syntenic regions reveal the relationship and genetic diversity among the Piscina strain, local isolates (RCA, Prea, Capivara, and Aceguá), and other whole-genome sequenced Leptospira interrogans strains.

DISCUSSION

The virulence of Leptospira spp. is known to be strain dependent (Adler & Moctezuma 2010), as highlighted by the sequencing of two L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo strains (Bulach et al. 2006). In a previous study, the high virulence of the Piscina isolate was confirmed in an animal model (Forster et al. 2013). Here, we generated the whole-genome sequence of Piscina isolate. The final assembly of the genome was 4.58 Mb, similar to that of the L. interrogans serovar Copenhageni Fiocruz L1-130 reference strain (Nascimento et al. 2004).

Along with the protein-coding genes, tRNAs, and rRNAs, we were able to identify other non-coding features, such as transfer-messenger RNAs (tmRNAs), riboswitches, RNase P, and clusters of regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci (Table I). The majority of previous efforts to understand the pathogenesis were focused on protein-coding genes to identify virulence factors and new targets for vaccines and diagnosis; therefore, the annotation of non-coding features in Leptospira genomes was usually neglected. However, a previous study demonstrated that some of these non-coding features, such as riboswitches and CRISPR loci, are differentially distributed among saprophytic and pathogenic strains (Fouts et al. 2016).

Riboswitches are non-coding RNA motifs that are present in the 5′ untranslated regions (UTR) of some mRNAs and act as cis-regulatory elements that may suppress or activate gene expression. They are usually present in the genes associated with the synthesis of some vitamins (e.g., cobalamin, thiamine). Previous research has suggested that pathogenic species of Leptospira present complete riboswitch-regulated operons for the biosynthesis of cobalamin, indicating that they are able to respond to cobalamin levels and produce this metabolite from simpler molecules; however, these operons and pathways are incomplete in saprophytic species (e.g., L. biflexa) (Ricaldi et al. 2012). As indicated in Tables I-II, our analysis identified four riboswitch loci, which are located in the upstream region of the genes A9P81_2540, A9P81_2899, A9P81_3614, and A9P81_3931. Interestingly, the gene A9P81_2540, homologous to the gene LIC_12374 from L. interrogans strain Fiocruz L1-130, encodes a TonB-like outer-membrane protein that is responsible for cobalamin transport, and has been identified by our group as a potential vaccine target as it presents a large number of computationally-predicted surface-exposed epitopes (Grassmann et al. 2017).

Similar to riboswitches, CRISPRs are also present in a large number in pathogenic species but less frequently in saprophytic species, indicating that these two groups use different mechanisms to evade being infected by phages and to prevent the transformation by foreign plasmids. The other identified families of non-coding features, including tmRNAs and RNase P, are mainly associated with the regulation of gene expression and are widely distributed among microbial genomes (Hayes & Keiler 2010).

To further characterise the Piscina isolate, identification of genes encoding several pathogen species-specific antigens was performed. As expected, the sequenced genome presented genes encoding Leptospira virulencerelated factors and important potential vaccine candidates (Supplementary data, Table II). Some of these were surface-exposed proteins that act at the interface between the bacteria and host, are conserved among distinct serovars, and have been considered as suitable cross-protective vaccine candidates. Among these proteins are the OMPs, OmpL1, Lipl41, and LipL32; the Lig family proteins (LigA, LigB, and LigC), which contain bacterial immunoglobulin-like domains; and the lipoprotein Loa22, which is necessary for the virulence of L. interrogans and is considered to represent a good candidate for vaccine development (Dellagostin et al. 2017). In addition, the presence of genes encoding the set of six surface proteins of the leptospiral endostatin-like protein (Len) family (LenABCDEF), which are able to bind to the complement regulator factor H and mammalian extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, was confirmed (Stevenson et al. 2007).

Among the main virulence factors identified were the haemolytic sphingomyelinases (e.g., sph2), which may facilitate virulence during migration through host tissues and are missing in the non-pathogenic L. biflexa (Narayanavari et al. 2015). Additional important components of leptospiral virulence that were identified included fliM, a protein required for full and correct assembly of the flagella (Fontana et al. 2016), and fcpA, a flagellar protein essential for bacterial translational motility and invasion of the host cells (Wunder et al. 2016).

According to the combination of alleles, the Piscina isolate belongs to ST 17 of the MLST scheme 1, which comprises the serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae and serovars Icterohaemorrhagiae and Copenhageni (Table III). These results are in agreement with the early characterisation performed by Forster et al. (2013), which used the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) and the Sanger sequencing of the rpoB locus.

In the variant calling analysis, the most mutated loci were LIC_11095 and LIC_13379, with six and four missense SNPs, respectively. LIC_11095, which encodes an adenylate/guanylate cyclase (AGC), shows presence of orthologous genes found only in pathogenic and intermediary strains of Leptospira (Lehmann et al. 2013). They are described to be able to modulate the host's response to other pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Bordetella pertussis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ahuja et al. 2004). LIC_13379 is annotated as a protease that contains the CAAX motif; however, its role in Leptospira virulence is poorly understood. By using the variant calling pipeline, we were able to identify 119 SNPs in the Piscina isolate, which are relatively low in number when compared to those of other L. interrogans strains (Xu et al. 2016). One explanation is that Ion Torrent platform has a high error-rate in homopolymeric regions, and some regions of low quality may contain other short variants, such as INDELs (insertions and deletions), that have not been identified. However, it may also indicate that Piscina and L1-130 are closely related strains, and may be a part of not only the same ST and serogroup, but also the same clonal group, which is also suggested from the results of structural genomics comparison (Fig. 1) and the phylogeny analysis (Fig. 2).

The structural comparison of the strains Piscina, RCA, Prea, and Capivara with the reference genome of the strain Fiocruz L1-130 allowed the identification of genomic inversions and/or translocations in all the genomes. Piscina showed the higher degree of structural similarity, although an inversion was observed in chromosome II, while Prea, RCA, and Capivara showed a large number of translocations and inversions in both the chromosomes, indicating that L. interrogans might present high plasticity in the genome organisation even when comparing strains from the same ST. Additionally, structural rearrangements have already been associated with a wide variety of phenotype-regulation processes; therefore, it is possible that their identification and characterisation may enhance understanding of some biological processes, such as adaptation to the host and immune response evasion. As a typical L. interrogans genome usually presents ~80 genes encoding transposases (e.g., strain Fiocruz L1-130), the identification of these rearrangement events in newly sequenced genomes is not unexpected. However, in contrast to the current research, they are usually only described when comparing non-closely related strains, such as those from different serogroups or serovars (Nascimento et al. 2004). While strain Piscina was obtained from a contaminated pool containing dead rats (environmental sample), the strains Prea, RCA, and Capivara were obtained from different mammal hosts (Cavia aperea, Canis lupus familiaris, and Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris, respectively). Therefore, it may suggest a potential relationship between host-adaptation and genome rearrangements, although our comparison is still limited by the small number of strains.

The availability of the whole genome sequence of a highly virulent L. interrogans strain isolated from southern Brazil provides researchers with a valuable opportunity to study differences in genome structures and facilitates the development of a comprehensive understanding of local isolates. The genome features of the local isolates contribute to comparative analyses with other sequenced genomes of the pathogenic Leptospira spp., thereby allowing the identification of new targets for the development of diagnostic kits and vaccines. Therefore, sequencing new local isolates provides genetic and epidemiological information that can improve existing knowledge of the L. interrogans infection.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers - The whole genome shotgun projects have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accessions CP018146.1 (Chromosome I) and CP018147.1 (Chromosome II).

  • Financial support: CAPES, CNPq, FAPERGS.

REFERENCES

  • Adler B, Moctezuma AP. Leptospira and leptospirosis. Vet Microbiol. 2010; 140(3): 287-96.
  • Ahuja N, Kumar P, Bhatnagar R. The adenylate cyclase toxins. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2004; 30(3): 187-96.
  • Angiuoli SV, Salzberg SL. Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes. Bioinformatics. 2011; 2793): 334-42.
  • Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012; 19(5): 455-77.
  • Boonsilp S, Thaipadungpanit J, Amornchai P, Wuthiekanun V, Bailey MS, Holden MTG, et al. A single multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for seven pathogenic Leptospira species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(1): e1954.
  • Bourhy P, Collet L, Brisse S, Picardeau M. Leptospira mayottensis sp. nov., a pathogenic species of the genus Leptospira isolated from humans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014; 64(12): 4061-7.
  • Bulach DM, Zuerner RL, Wilson P, Seemann T, McGrath A, Cullen PA, et al. Genome reduction in Leptospira borgpetersenii reflects limited transmission potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(39): 14560-5.
  • Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang LL, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w 1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012; 6(2): 80-92.
  • Dellagostin OA, Grassmann AA, Rizzi C, Schuch RA, Jorge S, Oliveira TL, et al. Reverse vaccinology : an approach for identifying leptospiral vaccine candidates. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(1): 158.
  • Fontana C, Lambert A, Benaroudj N, Gasparini D, Gorgette O, Cachet N, et al. Analysis of a spontaneous non-motile and avirulent mutant shows that fliM is required for full endoflagella assembly in Leptospira interrogans PLoS One. 2016; 11(4): e0152916.
  • Forster KM, Hartwig DD, Oliveira TL, Bacelo KL, Schuch R, Amaral MG, et al. DNA prime-protein boost based vaccination with a conserved region of leptospiral immunoglobulin-like A and B proteins enhances protection against leptospirosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015; 110(8): 989-95.
  • Forster KM, Hartwig DD, Seixas FK, McBride AJA, Monte LG, Recuero ALC, et al. Characterization of a virulent Leptospira interrogans strain isolated from an abandoned swimming pool. Braz J Microbiol. 2013; 44(1): 165-70.
  • Fouts DE, Matthias MA, Adhikarla H, Adler B, Amorim-Santos L, Berg DE, et al. What makes a bacterial species pathogenic?: comparative genomic analysis of the genus Leptospira PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016; 10(2): e0004403.
  • Grassmann AA, Kremer FS, dos Santos JC, Souza JD, Pinto LS, McBride AJA. Discovery of novel leptospirosis vaccine candidates using reverse and structural vaccinology. Front Immunol. 2017; 8: 463.
  • Hayes CS, Keiler KC. Beyond ribosome rescue: tmRNA and co-translational processes. FEBS Lett. 2010; 584(2): 413-19.
  • Kosugi S, Hirakawa H, Tabata S. GMcloser: closing gaps in assemblies accurately with a likelihood-based selection of contig or long-read alignments. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(23): 3733-41.
  • Kremer FS, Eslabão MR, Dellagostin OA, Pinto LS. Genix: a new online automated pipeline for bacterial genome annotation. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016a; 363(23): fnw263.
  • Kremer FS, Eslabão MR, Jorge S, Oliveira NR, Labonde J, Santos MNP, et al. Draft genome of the Leptospira interrogans strains, Acegua, RCA, Prea and Capivara, obtained from wildlife maintenance hosts and infected domestic animals. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016b; 111(4): 280-3.
  • Lehmann JS, Fouts DE, Haft DH, Cannella AP, Ricaldi JN, Brinkac L, et al. Pathogenomic inference of virulence-associated genes in Leptospira interrogans PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(10): e2468.
  • Lin S-H, Liao Y-C. CISA: contig integrator for sequence assembly of bacterial genomes. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(3): e60843.
  • Lu C, Chen K-T, Huang S-Y, Chiu H-T. CAR: contig assembly of prokaryotic draft genomes using rearrangements. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014; 15(1): 381.
  • Narayanavari SA, Lourdault K, Sritharan M, Haake DA, Matsunaga J. Role of sph2 gene regulation in hemolytic and sphingomyelinase activities produced by Leptospira interrogans PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015; 9(8): 1-23.
  • Nascimento ALTO, Ko AI, Martins EAL, Monteiro-Vitorello CB, Ho PL, Haake DA, et al. Comparative genomics of two Leptospira interrogans serovars reveals novel insights into physiology and pathogenesis. J Bacteriol. 2004; 186(7): 2164-72.
  • Picardeau M, Bulach DM, Bouchier C, Zuerner RL, Zidane N, Wilson PJ, et al. Genome sequence of the saprophyte Leptospira biflexa provides insights into the evolution of Leptospira and the pathogenesis of leptospirosis. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(2): e1607.
  • Piro VC, Faoro H, Weiss VA, Steffens MBR, Pedrosa FO, Souza EM, et al. FGAP: an automated gap closing tool. BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7: 371.
  • Ricaldi JN, Fouts DE, Selengut JD, Harkins DM, Patra KP, Moreno A, et al. Whole genome analysis of Leptospira licerasiae provides insight into leptospiral evolution and pathogenicity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012; 6(10): e1853.
  • Rutherford K, Parkhill J, Crook J, Horsnell T, Rice P, Rajandream M-A, et al. Artemis: sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics. 2000; 16(10): 944-5.
  • Stevenson B, Choy HA, Pinne M, Rotondi ML, Miller MC, DeMoll E, et al. Leptospira interrogans endostatin-like outer membrane proteins bind host fibronectin, laminin and regulators of complement. PLoS ONE. 2007; 2(11): e1188.
  • Wunder EA, Figueira CP, Benaroudj N, Hu B, Tong BA, Trajtenberg F, et al. A novel flagellar sheath protein, FcpA, determines filament coiling, translational motility and virulence for the Leptospira spirochete. Mol Microbiol. 2016; 101(3): 457-70.
  • Xu Y, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Chang Y-F, Zhang Y, Jiang X, et al. Whole genome sequencing revealed host adaptation-focused genomic plasticity of pathogenic Leptospira Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 20020.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Feb 2018

History

  • Received
    02 Apr 2017
  • Accepted
    20 June 2017
location_on
Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde Av. Brasil, 4365 - Pavilhão Mourisco, Manguinhos, 21040-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil, Tel.: (55 21) 2562-1222, Fax: (55 21) 2562 1220 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: memorias@fiocruz.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro