Aortic Isthmus Doppler Velocimetry in Fetuses with Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A Literature Review

Ferraz, Mariana Martins; Araújo, Flávia do Vale; Carvalho, Paulo Roberto Nassar de; Sá, Renato Augusto Moreira de

doi:10.1055/s-0040-1710301

Abstract

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) is associated with poor perinatal prognosis and a higher risk of stillbirth, neonatal death, and cerebral palsy. Its detection and the evaluation of its severity by new Doppler velocimetric parameters, such as aortic isthmus (AoI), are of great relevance for obstetrical practice. The AoI is a vascular segment that represents a point of communication between the right and left fetal circulations. It is considered to be a functional arterial shunt that reflects the relationship between the systemic and cerebral impedances, and has recently been proposed as a tool to detect the status of hemodynamic balance and prognosis of IUGR in fetuses. In the present review, we noticed that in healthy fetuses, the AoI net flow is always antegrade, but in fetuses with IUGR the deterioration of placental function leads to progressive reduction in its flow until it becomes mostly retrograde; this point is associated with a drastic reduction in oxygen delivery to the brain. The more impaired the AoI flow is, the greater is the risk of impairment in the Doppler velocimetry of other vessels; and the alterations of the AoI Doppler seem to precede other indicators of severe hypoxemia. Although there seems to be an association between the presence of retrograde flow in the AoI and the risk of long-term neurologic disability, its role in the prediction of perinatal morbi-mortality remains unclear. The AoI Doppler seems to be a promising tool in the management of fetuses with IUGR, but more studies are needed to investigate its employment in clinical practice.

Keywords doppler velocimetry; Doppler; aortic isthmus; intrauterine growth restriction; intrauterine growth retardation; placental insufﬁciency

Resumo

O crescimento intrauterino restrito (CIUR) está associado a um prognóstico perinatal adverso, com maior risco de óbito intrauterino e neonatal, bem como de paralisia cerebral. Assim, sua detecção e a determinação de sua gravidade por novos parâmetros Dopplervelocimétricos, como o istmo aórtico (IAo), são de fundamental importância na prática obstétrica. O IAo é um segmento vascular que representa um ponto de comunicação entre os sistemas circulatórios fetais esquerdo e direito. É considerado um shunt arterial funcional, capaz de refletir a relação entre as impedâncias dos circuitos cerebral e sistêmico, e foi proposto como uma ferramenta para detecção do status do equilíbrio hemodinâmico e do prognóstico de fetos com CIUR. Na presente revisão, observou-se que, em fetos saudáveis, o fluxo predominante no IAo é sempre anterógrado; mas em fetos com CIUR a deterioração do estágio de insuﬁciência placentária acarreta reduções progressivas no fluxo ístmico até este apresentar sentido predominantemente retrógrado e levar a uma drástica redução no aporte de oxigênio ao sistema nervoso central. Quanto mais alterado estiver o fluxo no IAo, maior a chance de haver alteração na Dopplervelocimetria de outros vasos; e as alterações no Doppler do IAo parecem preceder outros indicadores de hipoxemia severa. Embora o fluxo retrógrado no IAo pareça se correlacionar com maior risco de alteração no desenvolvimento neurológico a longo prazo, ainda não está claro o seu papel na predição de morbimortalidade perinatal. O Doppler do IAo parece ser um parâmetro promissor no manejo do CIUR; entretanto, mais estudos são necessários para avaliar seu emprego na prática clínica.

Palavras-chave dopplervelocimetri; doppler; istmo aórtico; crescimento intrauterino restrito; crescimento intrauterino retardo; insuﬁciência placentária

Introduction

Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) can be deﬁned as the failure of a fetus to achieve its full growth potential and can be caused by placental, chromosomal, or environmental factors. This condition is associated with a poor perinatal outcome, and it is responsible for 50% of intrauterine demise; it elevates the risks of intrapartum fetal distress, emergency caesarian section, cerebral palsy, and perinatal death.¹^,² Therefore, its detection and the determination of its severity are of major relevance for obstetric practice and constitute an opportunity for intervention to prevent unpleasant perinatal outcomes.

Placental insufﬁciency is the main etiological factor responsible for IUGR, affecting up to 15% of all pregnancies.³ Such insufﬁciency provokes signiﬁcant changes in fetal circulation that induce mechanisms of hemodynamic compensation.²^-⁴ Comprehension of this adaptive process of vascular redistribution is the key to the appropriate management of IUGR and explains the crucial role of Doppler velocimetry in the study of gestational vessels. Since there is no effective intrauterine treatment for IUGR caused by placental insufﬁciency, the aim of Doppler fetal monitoring is to detect the moment of hemodynamic decompensation at which the risk of maintaining the concept of a hypoxic environment should be balanced against risks related to prematurity caused by the interruption of gestation.²^,³^,⁵^,⁶

While insonation of maternal vessels, such as the uterine arteries and some fetal vessels-like the umbilical artery, middle cerebral artery, and ductus venosus-is well established in clinical practice, other vessels have recently been proposed to be useful in the prognostic evaluation and decision-making process of selecting the ideal moment for delivery.²^,⁴^,⁶^,⁷ One such case is the aortic isthmus (AoI), which was ﬁrst described in 1993 and was proposed as a new tool to monitor hemodynamic and metabolic balance in fetuses with IUGR.⁸

The AoI is a vascular segment located between the origin of the left subclavian artery and the connection of the ductus arteriosus in the descendent aorta; it represents a point of communication between the right and left fetal circulations. Because of this anatomical characteristic, the AoI is considered to be a functional arterial shunt, reflecting the relationship between impedances of the cerebral circuit (supplied by the left ventricle) and the systemic circuit (perfused by the right ventricle). Changes in AoI blood flow could arise as a result of an imbalance between the vascular adaptations of these two parallel circulations. A hemodynamic impairment capable of overwhelming the systemic resistance to the detriment of the central impedance could reverse the direction of flow in the AoI, leading to poorly oxygenated blood being ejected from the right ventricle and to the central nervous system, thus causing cerebral hypoxia. Considering this singularity, the AoI Doppler has been the focus of many investigations and has been highlighted as a possible marker of the moment of critical hemodynamic decompensation that gives rise to cerebral hypoxia, especially in fetuses with late IUGR.

The aim of this study was to review and discuss our current knowledge relating to Doppler velocimetry in the AoI along the time course of pregnancy in fetuses with IUGR.

Review Results

This is a review of the literature retrieved via searches of the MEDLINE/PubMed, and the LILACS and Scielo databases for articles containing the following keywords: aortic isthmus [AND] intrauterine growth restriction [OR] intrauterine growth retardation.

Because this review relates to a recent topic, no restriction criteria were used in regard to the year of publication; the earliest article was published in 1993 and the latest was published in 2018. No language ﬁlter was applied, and the articles found and included in this study were published in either English or French.

In total, 46 articles were identiﬁed by the initial search. Of these, 11 were excluded because they were considered to be irrelevant to the main theme, and another 10 were excluded because they were review/opinion papers or because they showed evidence of methodological problems. We searched the bibliographies of the 25 remaining studies for citations of interest, which led to the inclusion of 6 additional articles. Consequently, this review is based upon 31 published articles.

Discussion

Aortic Isthmus Doppler in Normal Fetuses

The study of the aortic isthmus (AoI) began with animal experiments in which surgical models of placental resistance were established using fetal lambs. This model allowed the analysis of flow parameters in the AoI and the umbilical artery (UA) at different levels of placental insufﬁciency.⁸ This experiment showed that progressive mechanical compression of the umbilical vein (thus promoting resistance to placental flow) provoked changes in the volume and direction of the diastolic flow, which began earlier and were more pronounced in the AoI than in the UA. This association highlighted the AoI as a sensitive marker of the status of umbilical circulation.⁸

Afterwards, the same group repeated a similar experimental protocol and correlated the changes in AoI flow with the carotid oxygen delivery to the central nervous system.⁹ The data showed that while the net blood flow in the AoI was still antegrade, the content of oxygen in the carotid artery remained relatively constant. However, when the net flow became retrograde, there was an abrupt decrease in the level of carotid oxygenation, thus indicating the moment of decompensation when cerebral hypoxia was induced.

Following these promising initial results of animal experiments, the use of Doppler velocimetry in the analysis of the AoI became a subject of interest to researchers working on human fetuses. Observational studies were conducted with the aim of describing the characteristics of the AoI flow proﬁle throughout gestation in fetuses without any pathology. It was shown that the flow velocity waveform in the AoI changes as pregnancy advances.¹⁰ After a typical quick systolic peak, observed at all gestational ages, the morphology of the wave deceleration, which marks the transition from systole to diastole, undergoes slight modiﬁcations. Before 20 weeks, this deceleration occurs in a smooth and uniform manner without the formation of incisura (►Fig. 1). Between 20 and 25 weeks, a sharp deceleration is observed at the end of systole, which is followed by an acceleration during early diastole, thus forming an incisura (►Fig. 2). From 25 to 30 weeks, this incisura progressively increases, reaching its nadir around zero velocity at ~ 30 weeks of gestation (►Fig. 3). After 31 weeks, there is a brief reverse flow at the beginning of diastole, which is more pronounced as gestation progresses (►Fig. 4). However, it is not clear if this reverse flow represents a technical artifact or a physiological effect caused by the increase in flow from the right ventricle, which is known to occur at the end of systole around this gestational age.¹⁰^,¹¹

Fig. 1
Aortic isthmus Doppler of a 15-week fetus showing a smooth and uniform deceleration without incisura.

Fig. 2
Aortic isthmus flow profile of a 22-week fetus demonstrating an incisura formed by a sharp deceleration at the end of systole, followed by an acceleration during early diastole.

Fig. 3
Aortic isthmus flow velocity waveform of a 27-week fetus with a more pronounced incisura.

Fig. 4
Aortic isthmus Doppler of a 32-week fetus revealing a brief reverse flow at the beginning of diastole.

Quantitative physiological changes, as measured by AoI Doppler velocimetric indices, have been documented throughout gestation in a range of observational studies, which determined useful reference values for each gestational age.¹¹^,¹² These studies identiﬁed an increase in the pulsatility index (PI) and in the peak systolic velocity (PSV) with the advancement of pregnancy as well as a reduction in diastolic flow.¹¹^,¹² The modiﬁcations in the AoI and UA indices were shown to be independent variables.¹¹ There have been no cases of absent or net reverse diastolic flow documented for normal pregnancies.¹²

Another important issue in the investigation of AoI Doppler was the technical validation of this technique as a diagnostic method with good intra and interobserver reproducibility.¹³^,¹⁴Both sagittal and transverse planes have proven to exert good reliability.¹⁴^-¹⁶ The sagittal plane can be obtained with a 90° transducer rotation from the fetal heart 4-chamber horizontal view, thus providing a clear visualization of the aortic arch. The AoI flow can then be identiﬁed by placing the gate a few millimeters beyond the origin of the left subclavian artery (►Fig. 5). The transverse plane can be evaluated from a viewpoint that includes the three vessels and the trachea and by identifying the convergence of the ductus arteriosus with the aorta; this forms a ‘V’ shaped image, and the gate should be placed just before the edge of the ‘V’ (►Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
Sagittal plane of the Aortic isthmus; the gate (*) should be placed a few millimeters beyond the origin of the left subclavian artery (Lsa). Ao indicates Aorta.

Fig. 6
Transverse plane of the Aortic isthmus, in three-vessel view, with the gate (*) placed just before the edge of the V shape formed by the convergence of the ductus arteriosus with the aorta (Ao). Pa indicates pulmonary artery; and Scv, superior vena cava.

Although the technical pattern of AoI insonation has been established, there has yet to be a consensus on the best index with which to measure its alterations. Ruskamp et al¹² proposed the use of the isthmic flow index (IFI), calculated by the formula (S þ D)/S, where S ¼ systolic velocity integral and D ¼ diastolic velocity integral. The IFI could then be classiﬁed as type I when its value is > 1, representing an antegrade flow in both systole and diastole; type II when the IFI is between 0 and 1, reflecting a diastolic reverse flow, but with a predominantly antegrade systolic flow; or type III when the IFI < 0, thus reflecting a predominantly retrograde flow.¹² Even though this index is capable of highlighting changes in the direction of diastolic flow in a very sensitive manner, it involves a complex formula that requires manual calculation. Other authors have defended the application of the traditional PI, which is simpler and has proven sensitivity for detecting changes in AoI flow.⁵^,¹¹^,¹⁴^,¹⁵However, this index was developed to calculate flow impedance in a single artery and does not incorporate the complexity of the range of determinants that influence the AoI and cannot indicate the presence or quantify the retrograde component of AoI flow.¹²^,¹³Some researchers, however, apply a simple qualitative analysis of wave flow; these researchers consider the presence of any diastolic flow as being normal and classify cases with an absent or negative diastole as being abnormal.¹⁷ Other researchers calculate the ratio of the systolic velocity integral to the retrograde diastolic velocity integral and deﬁne net antegrade flow when this ratio is > 1and net retrograde flow when the ratio is < 1.⁴^,⁷ While quantitative indices allow the identiﬁcation of more subtle and earlier changes, the qualitative evaluation of the flow direction allows the selection of more compromised fetuses with a greater risk of cerebral hypoxia.¹⁴

Aortic Isthmus Doppler in Fetuses with Growth Restriction

Due to the diversity of methods used to measure the AoI flow, the comparison of results obtained by different studies represents a challenging task. However, it is still possible to draw some conclusions in regard to the compromised AoI Doppler data obtained from fetuses affected by IUGR.

Observational studies in fetuses with IUGR have shown that changes in AoI Doppler (described either qualitatively or quantitatively) were related to the degree of fetal hemodynamic compromise; the more altered the flow in the AoI was, the greater was the chance of changes occurring in other vessels.⁵^,¹⁸^-²⁰By analyzing the Doppler velocimetry of 100 fetuses with IUGR and an UA-PI > p95, Sonesson and Fouron¹⁸ demonstrated that an absent/reverse diastolic flow was more frequently seen in the AoI than in the UA. Furthermore, when there was an absent/reverse diastolic flow in the UA, this effect was also present in the AoI but in a more pronounced manner. Benavides-Serralde et al¹⁹ observed that fetuses with an UA-PI < p95 maintained a normal IFI; however, progressive changes in UA flow were followed by greater changes in the AoI.

Other studies have compared AoI Doppler velocimetry in fetuses with IUGR with that of normal fetuses and have shown lower velocity indices (e.g., end diastolic velocity - EDV; peak systolic velocity - PSV; time-averaged maximum velocity - TAMXV) and higher resistance indices (e.g., pulsatility index - PI; resistance index - RI) in the fetuses with IUGR.⁵^,²¹

In regard to these ﬁndings, Cruz-Martinez et al²² attempted to investigate whether AoI Doppler could play a role in distinguishing between late IUGR fetuses and constitutionally small fetuses. These authors compared the Doppler velocimetry results of 178 small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses (with an estimated weight < p10 and an UA-PI < p95) with those of 178 fetuses with an adequate for gestational age (AGA) weight. They identiﬁed a signiﬁcantly higher AoI-PI (3.84 vs 2.87; p < 0.01) in SGA fetuses, concomitant with a greater incidence of the indices above p95 (14.6% vs 5.1%). Of the fetuses with AoI net retrograde flow, none were classiﬁed as having AGA weight, 15.4% had neonatal acidosis, and 84.6% required emergency Caesarian section for fetal distress. This study found that a proportion of SGA fetuses showed AoI Doppler abnormalities that were associated with a poorer fetal prognosis, suggesting that AoI impairment could identify a group of fetuses at greater risk of adverse outcomes presumably attributed to late IUGR. However, a similar study comparing 72 AGA, 48 SGA and 10 IUGR fetuses did not identify any signiﬁcant differences in terms of Ao-PI when compared across the three groups.¹⁴ It is likely that this discrepancy is due to the small number of patients in the second study; nevertheless, at the present time, it is not possible to consider AoI as a valid parameter to distinguish between constitutionally small fetuses and those with true growth restriction.

Some other studies have tried to longitudinally analyze the moment at which AoI Doppler changes are established in fetuses with IUGR and to determine its relationship with the onset of abnormalities in other vessels. Studies showed that an elevation of UA-PI precedes changes in the AoI by 11 to 20 days, but in the MCA-PI, this elevation occurs 7 to 15 days prior.⁶^,²³ Alterations in the DV-PI succeed deterioration in the AoIby2to 7days.⁵^,⁶^,²³^,²⁴ In observing a population of 31 fetuses with IUGR and UA absent/reverse diastolic flow, Rizzo et al¹⁷ demonstrated that in all cases involving DV reverse diastolic flow, there was also evidence of AoI retrograde net flow. Furthermore, of the fetuses with a DV-positive diastolic flow, those with AoI retrograde net flow were delivered earlier.

Despite the fact that several studies have investigated AoI Doppler changes in fetuses with IUGR and have arrived at similar conclusions, all of the studies were performed with a small number of patients. Only one previous study recruited a larger population and showed that a small impairment of the AoI did not appear to precede DV changes.²⁵This study formed part of a multicenter clinical trial that prospectively analyzed Doppler changes in 1,116 fetuses with gestational ages between 24 and 37 weeks, with an estimated weight < p10 but above 500 g. The detected prevalence of altered Doppler velocimetry was 46% in the UA, 27% in the MCA, 11% in the DV, and only 5% in the AoI. The low prevalence of AoI Doppler changes placed signiﬁcant doubt on the potential role of this manifestation in clinical practice.

Perinatal Outcomes

The physiopathology involved in the change of AoI flow direction appears to be related not only to the augmentation of peripheral vascular resistance and cerebral vasodilation but also to the failure of adaptive mechanisms underlying the redistribution of pulmonary blood flow to the systemic circulation.²⁶ During an investigation of hemodynamic changes in fetuses with IUGR, Makikallio et al⁴^,²⁷compared the changes occurring in different fetal vessels that maintained an antegrade AoI flow with vessels showing a retrograde AoI flow. The data showed that placental function was equally affected, that the umbilical-cerebral ratio was similar between the two cohorts, and that the umbilical vein oxygen tension was equivalent.⁴ Moreover, the group showing antegrade AoI flow was able to redirect the blood ejected from the right ventricle by suppressing its supply to the pulmonary arteries and elevating the proportion of flow passing through the ductus arteriosus to the systemic circulation. Furthermore, the volume of blood directed from the right to the left atrium, through the foramen ovale, was greater in fetuses with antegrade AoI flow, allowing for a higher delivery of well-oxygenated blood to the left ventricle.²⁷ In contrast, fetuses with retrograde AoI flow were not able to undergo these adaptations and maintained a flow distribution similar to fetuses that were not suffering from placental insufﬁciency, resulting in a lesser capacity for cerebral oxygenation.⁴^,²⁷

These ﬁndings led to the assumption that the presence of retrograde flow in the AoI could be an indicator of poor fetal prognosis, including a higher risk of cerebral hypoxia and perinatal morbi-mortality. We identiﬁed 6 studies evaluating the value of AoI in predicting perinatal mortality; only one failed to show a statistically signiﬁcant correlation.²⁸ The other ﬁve studies reported a positive association between the risk of perinatal death and AoI Doppler change when this parameter was considered alone.⁵^,²³^,²⁹^-³¹ However, using multivariate analysis and considering gestational age and the presence of Doppler changes in other vessels collectively, Hernandez-Andrade et al³⁰ and Cruz-Lemini et al³¹ demonstrated that the power of AoI to predict mortality lost statistical signiﬁcance. This was probably because alterations in the AoI occur relatively early in the sequence of vascular changes in response to hypoxic deterioration, preceding DV changes by approximately one week and exhibiting a poor capacity to predict late events such as mortality.⁶^,³⁰^,³¹ Such instances require more acute markers of fetal acidosis, such as DV-PI.³⁰^,³¹

Studies that attempted to correlate changes in the AoI with perinatal morbidity were even less conclusive, presenting signiﬁcant heterogeneity in the parameters evaluated and conflicting results. Two studies collectively analyzed a range of unfavorable perinatal outcomes considered as total morbidity. One of these studies identiﬁed a positive association with the presence of AoI retrograde flow, while the other did not.²³^,²⁸ Three other studies investigated AoI as a predictor of the requirement of intensive neonatal care; these studies identiﬁed a consistently positive correlation.⁵^,²¹^,²⁹Of the three studies investigating UA-pH modiﬁcation, none were able to identify a relationship with the AoI.⁵^,²³^,²⁸ Four studies considered the 5th minute Apgar score as a potential outcome, and only 2 successfully related retrograde flow in the AoI to a lower Apgar score.⁵^,²¹^,²³^,²⁸One study found a greater risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, while two other studies did not.²³^,²⁸^,³² Consequently, AoI Doppler velocimetry has yet to demonstrate a clear and consistent role in the prediction of perinatal morbidity.

Long-term Outcomes

Despite the lack of clarity in regard to the role of AoI Doppler velocimetry in predicting perinatal morbidity, this technique has been shown to be a good predictor of long-term neurological morbidity.⁷^,³³^,³⁴ Cruz-Martinez et al³³ demonstrated a statistically signiﬁcant association between the presence of AoI retrograde net flow and abnormalities found during intracranial neonatal ultrasound (both transient and late lesions). In another study, Fouron et al⁷ correlated AoI net retrograde flow with a higher risk of long-term neurodevelopmental deﬁcit (relative risk ¼ 2.05-conﬁdence interval 95%; 1.49-2.83) and established a cutoff point to predict the risk of abnormal neurodevelopment. These authors proposed that an IFI value below 0.7 would be associated with a greater risk of impairment in late neurological tests, with a sensitivity of 55% and a speciﬁcity of 89%.³⁴

Conclusion

Since the publication of the ﬁrst experimental studies in animals, there have been signiﬁcant advances in the ﬁeld of aortic isthmus Doppler velocimetry. The physiology of the AoI in normal pregnancies and the physiopathology in cases of placental insufﬁciency have been elucidated, and changes in the velocity flow proﬁle in the AoI throughout gestation have beenwell described. It is clear that the predominant flow in the AoI is always antegrade in fetuses without any pathology and that as gestational age advances, there is a physiological reduction in its diastolic flow, resulting in a reduction in IFI and an elevation of AoI-PI. For fetuses affected by IUGR, there is a trend for the AoI to show lower velocity indices (e.g., PSV, EDV, and TAMX) and higher resistance indices (PI and RI). Furthermore, deterioration during the stage of placental insufﬁciency results in progressive reductions in AoI flow until this presents as a predominantly retrograde flow. At this point, there is a drastic reduction in the delivery of oxygen to the central nervous system. Studies have also shown that the more altered the AoI becomes, the greater is the chance of Doppler changes in other vessels and that the changes in AoI Doppler velocimetry appear to precede alterations that are indicative of severe hypoxemia, such as UA absent/reverse diastole and DV impairment. However, there are still many questions to be answered before this Doppler parameter can be endorsed by routine clinical practice. Despite validation of the AoI insonation technique, there is no uniformity in the method of flow measurement, thus compromising the comparability of results and the application of this technique across different centers. Although the presence of AoI retrograde flow appears to be related to a greater risk of long-term neurological impairment, its role in the prediction of perinatal morbi-mortality is not yet clear. Furthermore, there is insufﬁcient data to support the application of this tool to distinguish between constitutionally small and late IUGR fetuses. It is also important to emphasize that the majority of studies performed thus far have involved a small number of patients and that the only previous study that examined a large population did not provide any evidence that AoI changes were of great importance. Finally, all of the studies included in this present review involved an observational design; as yet, there has been no clinical trial investigating the incorporation of AoI Doppler velocimetry in the obstetric decision-making process. No study was designed to compare AoI Doppler ﬁndings with abnormal computerized cardiotocography tracings and we cannot speculate if this tool could be replaced by AoI Doppler methods. AoI Doppler seems to be a promising tool in the guidance of the hemodynamic status of fetuses with IUGR, especially in cases where the acquisition of the Ductus Venosus is difﬁcult, but the available evidence is still insufﬁcient to support its incorporation in obstetrical protocols. Further studies are now needed to evaluate the application of the AoI in IUGR management and to investigate if this could play a role in predicting the best moment of delivery. Since there are no intrauterine treatments available for fetuses with growth restriction, it has become very important to establish the most opportune moment for delivery. This decision must balance the complications of prematurity against the consequences of growing in a hypoxic environment; these factors are the key to managing placental insufﬁciency. The prompt detection of fetuses compromised by IUGR and the determination of the degree of hemodynamic imbalance are crucial in preventing the greater risk of stillbirth, neonatal death and cerebral palsy seen in this population. Attention should therefore be given to developing new diagnostic and prognostic tools and efforts should be made to make such tools clinically useful. In this context, the study of AoI Doppler velocimetry is of particularly important relevance.

References

¹ MacDonald TM, McCarthy EA, Walker SP. Shining light in dark corners: diagnosis and management of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(01):3-10. Doi: 10.1111/ajo.12264
» https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12264
² Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classiﬁcation of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(02):86-98. Doi: 10.1159/000357592
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000357592
³ Kennelly MM, Farah N, Turner MJ, Stuart B. Aortic isthmus Doppler velocimetry: role in assessment of preterm fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(05):395-401. Doi: 10.1002/pd.2474
» https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2474
⁴ Mäkikallio K, Jouppila P, Räsänen J. Retrograde net blood flow in the aortic isthmus in relation to human fetal arterial and venous circulations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(02):147-152. Doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00626.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00626.x
⁵ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, Bennasar M, Olivella A, Palacio M, et al. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus and perinatal outcome in preterm fetuses with severe intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(01):41-47. Doi: 10.1002/uog.5237
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5237
⁶ Figueras F, Benavides A, Del Rio M, Crispi F, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: longitudinal changes in ductus venosus and aortic isthmus flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(01):39-43. Doi: 10.1002/uog.6278
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6278
⁷ Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Amiel-Tison C, Infante-Rivard C, Fouron C, Skoll A, Veilleux A. Correlation between prenatal velocity waveforms in the aortic isthmus and neurodevelopmental outcome between the ages of 2 and 4 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(04):630-636. Doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.110696
» https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.110696
⁸ Bonnin P, Fouron JC, Teyssier G, Sonesson SE, Skoll A. Quantitative assessment of circulatory changes in the fetal aortic isthmus during progressive increase of resistance to umbilical blood flow. Circulation. 1993;88(01):216-222. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.216
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.1.216
⁹ Fouron JC, Skoll A, Sonesson SE, Pfizenmaier M, Jaeggi E, Lessard M. Relationship between flow through the fetal aortic isthmus and cerebral oxygenation during acute placental circulatory insufficiency in ovine fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1102-1107. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70089-x
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70089-x
¹⁰ Fouron JC, Zarelli M, Drblik P, Lessard M. Flow velocity profile of the fetal aortic isthmus through normal gestation. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74(05):483-486. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90908-3
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(94)90908-3
¹¹ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, López M, Palacio M, Gómez O, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler parameters of the fetal aortic isthmus during the second half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(01):71-76. Doi: 10.1002/uog.2827
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2827
¹² Ruskamp J, Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Raboisson MJ, Infante-Rivard C, Proulx F. Reference values for an index of fetal aortic isthmus blood flow during the second half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(05):441-444. Doi: 10.1002/uog.105
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.105
¹³ Fouron JC, Siles A, Montanari L, Morin L, Ville Y, Mivelaz Y, et al. Feasibility and reliability of Doppler flow recordings in the fetal aortic isthmus: a multicenter evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(06):690-693. Doi: 10.1002/uog.6411
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6411
¹⁴ Kennelly MM, Farah N, Hogan J, Reilly A, Turner MJ, Stuart B. Longitudinal study of aortic isthmus Doppler in appropriately grown and small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(04):414-420. Doi: 10.1002/uog.9076
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.9076
¹⁵ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, Bennasar M, Palacio M, Gómez O, et al. Doppler assessment of fetal aortic isthmus blood flow in two different sonographic planes during the second half of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(02):170-174. Doi: 10.1002/uog.1955
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1955
¹⁶ Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vendola M, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Use of the 3-vessel view to record Doppler velocity waveforms from the aortic isthmus in normally grown and growth-restricted fetuses: comparison with the long aortic arch view. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(11):1617-1622. Doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.11.1617
» https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.11.1617
¹⁷ Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vendola M, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Relationship between aortic isthmus and ductus venosus velocity waveforms in severe growth restricted fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(11):1042-1047. Doi: 10.1002/pd.2121
» https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2121
¹⁸ Sonesson SE, Fouron JC. Doppler velocimetry of the aortic isthmus in human fetuses with abnormal velocity waveforms in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(02):107-111. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020107.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020107.x
¹⁹ Benavides-Serralde A, Scheier M, Cruz-Martinez R, Crispi F, Figueras F, Gratacos E, Hernandez-Andrade E. Changes in central and peripheral circulation in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses at different stages of umbilical artery flow deterioration: new fetal cardiac and brain parameters. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(04):274-280. Doi: 10.1159/000323548
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000323548
²⁰ Brantberg A, Sonesson SE. Central arterial hemodynamics in small-for-gestational-age fetuses before and during maternal hyperoxygenation: a Doppler velocimetric study with particular attention to the aortic isthmus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14(04):237-243. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14040237.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14040237.x
²¹ Karakus R, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Esercan A, Dogan MM. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(03):170-174. Doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000126
» https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000126
²² Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Oros D, Gratacós E. Changes in myocardial performance index and aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in term, small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery pulsatility index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(04):400-405. Doi: 10.1002/uog.8976
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8976
²³ Abdelrazzaq K, Yeniel AO, Ergenoglu AM, Yildirim N, Akercan F, Karadadaş N. Fetal aortic isthmus Doppler measurements for prediction of perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(06):656-661. Doi: 10.1111/aogs.12070
» https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12070
²⁴ Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Benavides-Serralde A, Crispi F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Gratacós E. Sequence of changes in myocardial performance index in relation to aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(02):179-184. Doi: 10.1002/uog.8903
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8903
²⁵ Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, O’Donoghue K, et al. Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(06):539.e1-539.e7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039
²⁶ Garcia-Canadilla P, Rudenick PA, Crispi F, Cruz-Lemini M, Palau G, Camara O, et al. A computational model of the fetal circulation to quantify blood redistribution in intrauterine growth restriction. PLOS Comput Biol. 2014;10(06):e1003667. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003667
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003667
²⁷ Mäkikallio K, Jouppila P, Räsänen J. Retrograde aortic isthmus net blood flow and human fetal cardiac function in placental insufficiency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 2003;22(04):351-357. Doi: 10.1002/uog.232
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.232
²⁸ Ropacka-Lesiak M, Swider-Musielak J, Wójcicka M, Hamid A, Breborowicz GH. Retrograde diastolic blood flow in the aortic isthmus is not a simple marker of abnormal fetal outcome in pregnancy complicated by IUGR-a pilot study. Ginekol Pol. 2014;85(07):509-515. Doi: 10.17772/gp/1762
» https://doi.org/10.17772/gp/1762
²⁹ Hidar S, Zaafouri R, Bouguizane S, Chaïeb A, Jerbi M, Bibi M, Khaïri A. [Prognostic value of fetal aortic isthmus Doppler waveform in intrauterine growth retardation: prospective longitudinal study]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(08):745-752. Doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96637-9 French
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96637-9 French
³⁰ Hernandez-Andrade E, Crispi F, Benavides-Serralde JA, Plasencia W, Diesel HF, Eixarch E, et al. Contribution of the myocardial performance index and aortic isthmus blood flow index to predicting mortality in preterm growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(04):430-436. Doi: 10.1002/uog.7347
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7347
³¹ Cruz-Lemini M,Crispi F,Van Mieghem T,Pedraza D, Cruz-Martínez L, Acostas-Rojas R, et al. Risk of perinatal death in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction according to gestational age and cardiovascular Doppler indices: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):116-122. Doi: 10.1159/000333001
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000333001
³² Raboisson MJ, Huissoud C, Lapointe A, Hugues N, Bigras JL, Brassard M, et al. Assessment of uterine artery and aortic isthmus Doppler recordings as predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(03):232.e1-232.e6. Doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2011.11.005
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2011.11.005
³³ Cruz-Martinez R, Tenorio V, Padilla N, Crispi F, Figueras F, Gratacós E. Risk of ultrasound-detected neonatal brain abnormalities in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(04):452-459. Doi: 10.1002/uog.14920
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14920
³⁴ Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Raboisson MJ, Lamoureux J, Tisson CA, Fouron C, Hudon L. The relationship between an aortic isthmus blood flow velocity index and the postnatal neurodevelopmental status of fetuses with placental circulatory insufﬁciency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(02):497-503. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.026
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.026

Publication Dates

Publication in this collection
22 June 2020
Date of issue
May 2020

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

[1] ¹ MacDonald TM, McCarthy EA, Walker SP. Shining light in dark corners: diagnosis and management of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(01):3-10. Doi: 10.1111/ajo.12264
» https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12264

[2] ² Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classiﬁcation of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(02):86-98. Doi: 10.1159/000357592
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000357592

[3] ³ Kennelly MM, Farah N, Turner MJ, Stuart B. Aortic isthmus Doppler velocimetry: role in assessment of preterm fetal growth restriction. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(05):395-401. Doi: 10.1002/pd.2474
» https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2474

[4] ⁴ Mäkikallio K, Jouppila P, Räsänen J. Retrograde net blood flow in the aortic isthmus in relation to human fetal arterial and venous circulations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002;19(02):147-152. Doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00626.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00626.x

[5] ⁵ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, Bennasar M, Olivella A, Palacio M, et al. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus and perinatal outcome in preterm fetuses with severe intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(01):41-47. Doi: 10.1002/uog.5237
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5237

[6] ⁶ Figueras F, Benavides A, Del Rio M, Crispi F, Eixarch E, Martinez JM, et al. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: longitudinal changes in ductus venosus and aortic isthmus flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(01):39-43. Doi: 10.1002/uog.6278
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6278

[7] ⁷ Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Amiel-Tison C, Infante-Rivard C, Fouron C, Skoll A, Veilleux A. Correlation between prenatal velocity waveforms in the aortic isthmus and neurodevelopmental outcome between the ages of 2 and 4 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(04):630-636. Doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.110696
» https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.110696

[8] ⁸ Bonnin P, Fouron JC, Teyssier G, Sonesson SE, Skoll A. Quantitative assessment of circulatory changes in the fetal aortic isthmus during progressive increase of resistance to umbilical blood flow. Circulation. 1993;88(01):216-222. Doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.216
» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.1.216

[9] ⁹ Fouron JC, Skoll A, Sonesson SE, Pfizenmaier M, Jaeggi E, Lessard M. Relationship between flow through the fetal aortic isthmus and cerebral oxygenation during acute placental circulatory insufficiency in ovine fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181(5 Pt 1):1102-1107. Doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70089-x
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70089-x

[10] ¹⁰ Fouron JC, Zarelli M, Drblik P, Lessard M. Flow velocity profile of the fetal aortic isthmus through normal gestation. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74(05):483-486. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90908-3
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(94)90908-3

[11] ¹¹ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, López M, Palacio M, Gómez O, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler parameters of the fetal aortic isthmus during the second half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(01):71-76. Doi: 10.1002/uog.2827
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2827

[12] ¹² Ruskamp J, Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Raboisson MJ, Infante-Rivard C, Proulx F. Reference values for an index of fetal aortic isthmus blood flow during the second half of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(05):441-444. Doi: 10.1002/uog.105
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.105

[13] ¹³ Fouron JC, Siles A, Montanari L, Morin L, Ville Y, Mivelaz Y, et al. Feasibility and reliability of Doppler flow recordings in the fetal aortic isthmus: a multicenter evaluation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33(06):690-693. Doi: 10.1002/uog.6411
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6411

[14] ¹⁴ Kennelly MM, Farah N, Hogan J, Reilly A, Turner MJ, Stuart B. Longitudinal study of aortic isthmus Doppler in appropriately grown and small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39(04):414-420. Doi: 10.1002/uog.9076
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.9076

[15] ¹⁵ Del Río M, Martínez JM, Figueras F, Bennasar M, Palacio M, Gómez O, et al. Doppler assessment of fetal aortic isthmus blood flow in two different sonographic planes during the second half of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(02):170-174. Doi: 10.1002/uog.1955
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1955

[16] ¹⁶ Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vendola M, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Use of the 3-vessel view to record Doppler velocity waveforms from the aortic isthmus in normally grown and growth-restricted fetuses: comparison with the long aortic arch view. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(11):1617-1622. Doi: 10.7863/jum.2008.27.11.1617
» https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.11.1617

[17] ¹⁷ Rizzo G, Capponi A, Vendola M, Pietrolucci ME, Arduini D. Relationship between aortic isthmus and ductus venosus velocity waveforms in severe growth restricted fetuses. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28(11):1042-1047. Doi: 10.1002/pd.2121
» https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.2121

[18] ¹⁸ Sonesson SE, Fouron JC. Doppler velocimetry of the aortic isthmus in human fetuses with abnormal velocity waveforms in the umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(02):107-111. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020107.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10020107.x

[19] ¹⁹ Benavides-Serralde A, Scheier M, Cruz-Martinez R, Crispi F, Figueras F, Gratacos E, Hernandez-Andrade E. Changes in central and peripheral circulation in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses at different stages of umbilical artery flow deterioration: new fetal cardiac and brain parameters. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(04):274-280. Doi: 10.1159/000323548
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000323548

[20] ²⁰ Brantberg A, Sonesson SE. Central arterial hemodynamics in small-for-gestational-age fetuses before and during maternal hyperoxygenation: a Doppler velocimetric study with particular attention to the aortic isthmus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14(04):237-243. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14040237.x
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14040237.x

[21] ²¹ Karakus R, Ozgu-Erdinc AS, Esercan A, Dogan MM. Doppler assessment of the aortic isthmus intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(03):170-174. Doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000126
» https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000126

[22] ²² Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Oros D, Gratacós E. Changes in myocardial performance index and aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in term, small-for-gestational age fetuses with normal umbilical artery pulsatility index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(04):400-405. Doi: 10.1002/uog.8976
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8976

[23] ²³ Abdelrazzaq K, Yeniel AO, Ergenoglu AM, Yildirim N, Akercan F, Karadadaş N. Fetal aortic isthmus Doppler measurements for prediction of perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with fetal growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(06):656-661. Doi: 10.1111/aogs.12070
» https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12070

[24] ²⁴ Cruz-Martinez R, Figueras F, Benavides-Serralde A, Crispi F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Gratacós E. Sequence of changes in myocardial performance index in relation to aortic isthmus and ductus venosus Doppler in fetuses with early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(02):179-184. Doi: 10.1002/uog.8903
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8903

[25] ²⁵ Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, Kennelly MM, McAuliffe FM, O’Donoghue K, et al. Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(06):539.e1-539.e7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039

[26] ²⁶ Garcia-Canadilla P, Rudenick PA, Crispi F, Cruz-Lemini M, Palau G, Camara O, et al. A computational model of the fetal circulation to quantify blood redistribution in intrauterine growth restriction. PLOS Comput Biol. 2014;10(06):e1003667. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003667
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003667

[27] ²⁷ Mäkikallio K, Jouppila P, Räsänen J. Retrograde aortic isthmus net blood flow and human fetal cardiac function in placental insufficiency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol . 2003;22(04):351-357. Doi: 10.1002/uog.232
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.232

[28] ²⁸ Ropacka-Lesiak M, Swider-Musielak J, Wójcicka M, Hamid A, Breborowicz GH. Retrograde diastolic blood flow in the aortic isthmus is not a simple marker of abnormal fetal outcome in pregnancy complicated by IUGR-a pilot study. Ginekol Pol. 2014;85(07):509-515. Doi: 10.17772/gp/1762
» https://doi.org/10.17772/gp/1762

[29] ²⁹ Hidar S, Zaafouri R, Bouguizane S, Chaïeb A, Jerbi M, Bibi M, Khaïri A. [Prognostic value of fetal aortic isthmus Doppler waveform in intrauterine growth retardation: prospective longitudinal study]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(08):745-752. Doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96637-9 French
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96637-9 French

[30] ³⁰ Hernandez-Andrade E, Crispi F, Benavides-Serralde JA, Plasencia W, Diesel HF, Eixarch E, et al. Contribution of the myocardial performance index and aortic isthmus blood flow index to predicting mortality in preterm growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(04):430-436. Doi: 10.1002/uog.7347
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7347

[31] ³¹ Cruz-Lemini M,Crispi F,Van Mieghem T,Pedraza D, Cruz-Martínez L, Acostas-Rojas R, et al. Risk of perinatal death in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction according to gestational age and cardiovascular Doppler indices: a multicenter study. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(1-2):116-122. Doi: 10.1159/000333001
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000333001

[32] ³² Raboisson MJ, Huissoud C, Lapointe A, Hugues N, Bigras JL, Brassard M, et al. Assessment of uterine artery and aortic isthmus Doppler recordings as predictors of necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(03):232.e1-232.e6. Doi: 10.1016/j. ajog.2011.11.005
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ajog.2011.11.005

[33] ³³ Cruz-Martinez R, Tenorio V, Padilla N, Crispi F, Figueras F, Gratacós E. Risk of ultrasound-detected neonatal brain abnormalities in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks’ gestation: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(04):452-459. Doi: 10.1002/uog.14920
» https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14920

[34] ³⁴ Fouron JC, Gosselin J, Raboisson MJ, Lamoureux J, Tisson CA, Fouron C, Hudon L. The relationship between an aortic isthmus blood flow velocity index and the postnatal neurodevelopmental status of fetuses with placental circulatory insufﬁciency. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(02):497-503. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.026
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.026