Splenic ischemic preconditioning attenuates oxidative stress induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats¹

Abstract

Purpose:  To evaluate the effects of splenic ischemic preconditioning (sIPC) on oxidative stress induced by hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats.

Methods:  Fifteen male Wistar rats were equally divided into 3 groups: SHAM, IRI and sIPC. Animals from IRI group were subjected to 45 minutes of partial liver ischemia (70%). In the sIPC group, splenic artery was clamped in 2 cycles of 5 min of ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion (20 min total) prior to hepatic ischemia. SHAM group underwent the same surgical procedures as in the remaining groups, but no liver ischemia or sIPC were induced. After 1h, hepatic and splenic tissue samples were harvested for TBARS, CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd measurement.

Results:  sIPC treatment significantly decreased both hepatic and splenic levels of TBARS when compared to IRI group (p<0.01). Furthermore, the hepatic and splenic activities of CAT, GPx and GSH- Rd were significantly higher in sIPC group than in IRI group.

Conclusion:  sIPC was able to attenuate hepatic and splenic IRI-induced oxidative stress.

Key words: Liver Failure; Reperfusion Injury; Oxidative Stress; Ischemic Preconditioning; Rats

Introduction

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) refers to an exacerbation of cellular damage following restoration of blood flow and oxygen delivery to hypoxic tissues¹. It is a common cause of liver dysfunction after major resection/transplantation² and contributes to a high morbidity and mortality. Pathogenic mechanisms implicated in early hepatic IRI include Kupffer cell activation, release of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress due to the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS)^2,3.

Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), defined as multiple brief ischemic episodes before a sustained ischemic insult⁴, has been shown to attenuate experimental liver IRI by decreasing oxidative damage, inflammation, apoptosis and microcirculatory dysfunction⁵. When applied to tissues that are not directly exposed to ischemia, IPC can also provide cellular protection against a distant organ IRI, which is known as remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) procedure⁴. Different anatomical sites have been successfully used to perform RIPC among rodent models of hepatic IRI, such as hindlimb⁶ and superior mesenteric artery⁷, but other locations may ensure favorable outcomes as well.

Evidences suggest that spleen plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of liver IRI and that interventions modulating its function may be important therapeutic strategies. For example, splenic congestion during hepatic IRI can promote splenic interleukins excretion with subsequent leukocytes infiltration and parenchyma damage within liver⁸. Thus, splenectomy⁹ or splenic artery ligation¹⁰ performed prior to hepatic IRI have been able to suppress this collateral reaction and reduce both biochemical and histopathological injury. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated that intermittent occlusion of the splenic pedicle, described as splenic ischemic preconditioning (sIPC), can remotely reduce a remote renal IRI¹¹; however, there is no current data reporting its effects on the liver. Considering that RIPC protocols have a protective effect against hepatic IRI, transient splenic ischemia through sIPC could be also a hepatoprotective intervention.

Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of sIPC on oxidative stress induced by liver IRI in rats.

Methods

All experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals, Universidade do Estado do Pará (protocol number: 20/17) and followed the rules of the Brazilian National Law for Animal Care (Law 11.794/08).

A total of 15 male Wistar rats (12-15 weeks), weighing 260-310 g, were obtained from the vivarium of the Laboratory of Experimental Surgery (Pará State University, Brazil). Rats were kept under constant environmental conditions with controlled temperature (22°C-24°C), 12h day-night cycles and food/water ad libitum.

The animals were randomly allocated into three experimental groups: the IRI group underwent 45 minutes of liver ischemia followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion (n=5); the sIPC group was submitted to intermittent clamping of splenic artery (2 cycles of 5 min of ischemia and 5 min of reperfusion) prior to liver ischemia (n=5); and the sham-operated (SHAM) group underwent the same surgical procedures as in the remaining groups, but no liver ischemia or sIPC was induced (n=5).

Surgical procedures

For the surgical operation, all animals were anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of ketamine (70 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg); then, they were placed on a heating pad to maintain body temperature between 36.5-37.5°C. Through a midline laparotomy, partial hepatic ischemia (70% of liver mass) was induced by clamping the portal vein, hepatic artery and bile duct supplying the median and left lobes with an atraumatic microvascular clamp. In this method, the blood supply to right and caudate lobes remained uninterrupted, attenuating intestinal congestion through portal flow bypass¹². Reperfusion was initiated by removing the microvascular clamp. During all procedure, the bowel was protected by a gauze with heated saline (NaCl 0.9%) in order to avoid fluid loss through evaporation. Liver IRI was produced for 45 minutes of ischemia followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion¹³. After that period, left and median hepatic lobes, as well as the spleen, were harvested for biochemical analysis. Lastly, the animals were euthanized by lethal anesthetic doses.

In the sIPC group, splenic artery was dissected from its origin situated posterior to stomach. The gastrosplenic ligament, which contains short gastric vessels, remained intact and the splenocolic ligament was cut to facilitate spleen manipulation. sIPC was performed through intermittent occlusion of the splenic artery with an atraumatic microvascular clamp¹¹ and consisted in 2 cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion prior to the induction of liver ischemia.

Assay of TBARS concentration

Concentration of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), which represents the extent of lipid peroxidation by free-radicals, was measured using Winterbourn method¹⁴ modified to spectrophotometry analysis. Briefly, a mixture containing 0.2 ml of homogenized tissue sample (liver or spleen), 0.02 ml of butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT), 0.2 ml of 25% hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 0.2 ml of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) solution was vortexed and then heated at 100°C for 15 minutes. After cooling, 0.618 ml of butanol was added and centrifuged at 4.000 rpm for 2 minutes. Subsequently, the supernatant was taken out and its absorbance was measured at 532 nm. TBARS were quantified using an extinction coefficient of 1.56 × 10⁵ mol⁻¹.cm⁻¹ and expressed as nmol of TBARS per milliliters (nmol/ml).

Assay of CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd activities

Catalase (CAT) activity was measured according to the Aebi method¹⁵. An aliquot of tissue homogenate (0.2 ml) was added to a cuvette containing sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7) and 10 mM hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). Then, the enzymatic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide was monitored as the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm for 20 seconds and the results were expressed as units per milliliters (U/ml).

Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was determined using the method described by Flohé and Gunzler¹⁶ which is based on the reduction of tert-butyl hydroperoxide by the oxidation of glutathione (GSH) and formation of oxidized glutathione (GSSG) catalyzed by GPx. Subsequently, the decrease in absorbance of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) was analyzed at 340 nm, since NADPH is used in the restoration of GSH. The results were expressed as U/ml.

Glutathione reductase (GSH-Rd) activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the rate of NADPH oxidation, due to GSH formation from GSSG, at 340 nm according to Carlberg and Mannervik protocol¹⁷. GSH-Rd concentration was represented as U/ml.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as means ± standard deviation and analyzed using SPSS software version 25.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Shapiro-Wilk test was used to verify the normal distribution of the data. One-way analyses of variance with Tukey post hoc or Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to assess differences between groups. Statistical significance was assumed at p<0.05.

Results

IRI group had significantly higher hepatic (45.29 ± 3.18) and splenic (43.74 ± 2.14) levels of TBARS when compared to SHAM group (liver: 7.95 ± 0.57, P < 0.01; spleen: 9.99 ± 0.91, p<0.01). However, sIPC markedly decreased TBARS in liver (37.75 ± 0.94) and spleen (9.94 ± 0.63) as compared to IRI group (p<0.01) (Fig. 1A). CAT concentration was lower in IRI group (liver: 15.10 ± 3.44; spleen: 2.36 ± 0.23) than the SHAM group (liver: 17.53 ± 4.47; spleen: 4.20 ± 0.28), but without statistical difference. Rats from sIPC group showed remarkably higher CAT levels (liver: 84.65 ± 20.77; spleen: 13.05 ± 2.03) than those from IRI group (p<0.01) (Fig. 1B). GPx levels were significantly lower in IRI group (liver: 6.06 ± 1.66; spleen: 17.51 ± 2.86) than the SHAM group (liver: 14.35 ± 1.41, p<0.01; spleen: 23.57 ± 2.82, p<0.05). Notably, compared with the IRI group, sIPC increased GPx levels (liver: 8.81 ± 0.33, p<0.05; spleen: 32.65 ± 4.17, p<0.01) (Fig. 1C). Lastly, IRI mildly reduced GSH-Rd levels (liver: 11.20 ± 3.84; spleen: 12.44 ± 3.95) when compared to SHAM group (liver: 13.85 ± 6.65; spleen: 11.26 ± 2.21), although there was no statistical distinction. In contrast, GSH-Rd levels were significantly higher in sIPC group (liver: 20.51 ± 2.33; spleen: 18.29 ± 1.79) than in the IRI group (p<0.05) (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1
Hepatic and splenic levels of TBARS (A), CAT (B), GPX (C) and GSH-Rd (D) according to groups (n = 5 for each). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. *p<0.01, sIPC vs. IRI; #p<0.05, sIPC vs. IRI.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the beneficial effects of sIPC in an experimental model of liver IRI. Our experiment was inspired by the previous report by Shen et al.¹¹, which successfully demonstrated an anti-inflammatory activity of sIPC against renal IRI in rats. In their study, sIPC was achieved through intermittent clamping of the splenic pedicle and 3 cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion were used. In our sIPC protocol, for the purpose of minimizing surgical trauma on the splenic vasculature, we only performed 2 cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and 5 minutes of reperfusion.

In summary, our results showed that sIPC treatment suppressed oxidative stress induced by IRI, which was demonstrated by decreased TBARS level and enhanced activity of CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd. Moreover, we established that spleen is one of the organs affected by liver IRI, since rats submitted to IRI presented higher splenic levels of TBARS in association with lower concentration of CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd when compared to SHAM.

It is known that overproduction of the ROS is one of the main pathological process implicated in hepatic IRI. During the ischemic period, the reduction of oxygen supply culminates in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) depletion and failure of active transmembrane ion-transport, which sequentially leads to endothelial swelling and microcirculatory dysfunction^2,3. Posteriorly, there is activation of Kupffer cells with subsequent release of inflammatory cytokines and ROS, such as hydroxyl (OH⁻), superoxide anion (O₂⁻) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)³. Concomitantly, hypoxanthine accumulates in hepatic tissue due to progressive catabolism of ATP¹⁸.

Once reperfusion occurs, the restoration of oxygen delivery paradoxically exacerbates the initial insult through increased activation of enzymes involved in free-radicals production, such as xanthine-oxidase (XO), which in the presence of oxygen catalyzes the conversion of hypoxanthine to xanthine and simultaneously generates superoxide^1,18. The immediate consequence is characterized as an accumulation of ROS, resulting in extensive hepatocyte damage through DNA oxidation and lipid peroxidation³.

Endogenous antioxidant enzymes represent the major tissue defense against oxidative stress induced by IRI, since they are capable of removing oxygen free-radicals before they harm cellular structures¹⁹. In our study, we assessed the antioxidant activity of hepatic parenchyma by measuring the concentration of the enzymes CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd. CAT catalyzes the reduction of H₂O₂ to H₂O and O₂, preventing its participation in the formation of OH⁻, a highly deleterious free-radical; GPx reduces H₂O₂ and organic peroxides while oxidizing GSH to GSSG¹⁹; and GSH-Rd maintains a high GSH/GSSG ratio by reducing GSSG and restoring GSH, which is a defensive mechanism against oxidative stress²⁰.

It has been described that liver IRI is linked to depletion of these enzymes²¹. On the other hand, their increase is associated with favorable outcomes of hepatic IPC²², which was probably one of the cytoprotective effects induced by sIPC in our experiment. In 2002, Sindram et al.²³ suggested that oxygen-radicals play a pivotal role in triggering hepatoprotection from IPC. In their study, pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC), an effective free-radical scavenger, reversed the beneficial effects of IPC, indicating an oxidative stress dependent mechanism. Later evidences have shown that ROS exposure can also upregulate liver antioxidant systems by activating transcription factors within hepatocytes²⁴. Therefore, we hypothesize that our sIPC protocol provoked a short sublethal burst of oxygen free-radicals into circulation, which remotely enhanced antioxidant activity in hepatic tissue.

In general, the protective effects mediated by RIPC are not fully understood yet and other mechanisms may also have occurred in our study. For example, previous evidences reported that RIPC produced by transient limb⁶ or intestinal⁷ ischemia can attenuate liver IRI by inducing hepatic expression of Heme-Oxygenase-1 (HO-1), an enzyme responsible to degrade heme. HO-1 is also able to scavenge free-radicals and is commonly upregulated during stress conditions, such as hypoxia or oxidative stress²⁵.

We suggest that ROS released by sIPC could be taken to the liver and stimulated the local production of HO-1, which mediated a defensive effect against IRI. In addition, since HO-1 is normally detected in rat's spleen¹⁰, the transient hypoxia induced by our sIPC could upregulate its local expression, allowing its eventual drainage to the hepatic tissue. Furthermore, in the study of Shen et al.¹¹, sIPC attenuated renal IRI through inhibition of NF-kB pathway and upregulation of interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression, indicating an antiinflammatory effect. NF-kB is a nuclear transcription factor that regulates the expression of several proinflammatory cytokines and its suppression are associated with beneficial effects during liver IRI². Interestingly, RIPC performed through intermittent occlusion of superior mesenteric artery can also reduce the activity of NF-kB in the liver⁷, which implies a probable common hepatoprotective effect of RIPC procedures, including our sIPC protocol.

Current data indicate that RIPC induces tissue protection through a systemic neurohormonal connection. This mechanism is based on the release of humoral mediators or stimulation of afferent innervation that are capable of activating cellular survival pathways in a remote tissue⁴. Thus, organs sharing a close vascular and/or neurological anatomy, such as liver and spleen, may represent a mutual pathway to the protective effects related to RIPC.

In rat, liver and spleen are mainly connected through splenic vein, which is an important tributary of the extrahepatic part of portal vein. It has been reported that inflammatory mediators migrate to hepatic parenchyma during post-ischemic reperfusion⁸, indicating a potential hepatosplenic route for the transfer of humoral factors released after RIPC. On the other hand, the possible contribution of a splenic neural pathway during RIPC is more difficult to hypothesize. In a previous study by Lieder et al.²⁶, splenic denervation abrogated cardioprotection by RIPC in rats, whereas pharmacological activation of muscarinic receptors in an isolated perfused spleen induced the release of cardioprotective factors, supporting a vago-splenic axis. Therefore, we suggest that this neurological signaling could also be activated by our sIPC procedure; however, further studies are needed to elucidate such a hepatoprotective effect.

In a clinical scenario, the consequences of hepatic IRI are generally traduced as tissue poorly functioning after major resections or transplantation², but also as a systemic inflammatory response with multi-organ involvement²⁷. In the present study, we showed that spleen is significantly affected by liver IRI. Similar with our findings, previous reports also demonstrated that hepatic IRI induced remote oxidative damage on spleen^28,29.

In our experiment, splenic injury was probably a direct consequence of the release of ROS into circulation during hepatic reperfusion and the depletion of antioxidant enzymes was an indirect effect due to increased prooxidant mediators. We also assume that the model used for partial hepatic ischemia caused a certain degree of splenic congestion, which may have induced splenic production of cytokines, macrophage activation and additional injury to the spleen as suggested previously⁸.

In sIPC group, intermittent occlusion of splenic artery acted as a local IPC to spleen, reducing TBARS levels and attenuating the remote harmful effects from liver IRI. This protection may have been mediated in part through activation/inhibition of transcription factors with subsequent increase of endogenous antioxidant enzymes, such as CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd.

In the sIPC group, although liver and spleen had reduced levels of TBARS associated with increased activities of CAT, GPX and GSH, the favorable outcome appeared to be more effective on the splenic tissue. A possible explanation for this finding is that postischemic dysfunction of hepatic perfusion² may have impaired the passage of protective humoral factors, reducing the benefits of sIPC in liver. Furthermore, we suggest that effectiveness of RIPC may depend on which organ is applied. In our study, the spleen was affected by hepatic IRI and it is feasible that protective mediators expressed in splenic parenchyma were consumed locally to confront the damage in situ, which diminished their action at distance.

Conclusion

sIPC attenuated hepatic and splenic IRI-induced oxidative stress by enhancing the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes, such as CAT, GPx and GSH-Rd. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and elucidate the mechanisms by which sIPC establishes tissue protection.

• 1
  Research performed at Laboratory of Experimental Surgery and Laboratory of Morphophysiolgy Applied to Health, Universidade do Estado do Pará (UEPA), Belem-PA, Brazil.
• Financial source: none

References

• ¹ Granger DN, Kvietys PR. Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: the evolution of a concept. Redox Biol. 2015;6:524-51. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.020.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.020
• ² Serracino-Inglott F, Habib NA, Mathie RT. Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Surg. 2001;181:160-6. PMID: 11425059.
• ³ Klune JR, Tsung A. Molecular biology of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury: established mechanisms and recent advancements. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90:665-77. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.04.003.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2010.04.003
• ⁴ Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Ischaemic conditioning and reperfusion injury. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13:193-209. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.5.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/nrcardio.2016.5
• ⁵ Koti RS, Seifalian AM, Davidson BR. Protection of the liver by ischemic preconditioning: a review of mechanisms and clinical applications. Dig Surg. 2003;20:383-96. doi: 10.1159/000072064.
  » https://doi.org/10.1159/000072064
• ⁶ Wang F, Birch SE, He R, Tawadros P, Szaszi K, Kapus A, Rotstein OD. Remote ischemic preconditioning by hindlimb occlusion prevents liver ischemic/reperfusion injury: the role of High Mobility Group-Box 1. Ann Surg. 2010;251:292-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfda8c.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfda8c
• ⁷ Kageyama S, Hata K, Tanaka H, Hirao H, Kubota T, Okamura Y, Iwaisako K, Takada Y, Uemoto S. Intestinal ischemic preconditioning ameliorates hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats: role of heme oxygenase 1 in the second window of protection. Liver Transpl. 2015;21:112-22. doi: 10.1002/lt.24006.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24006
• ⁸ Kato H, Hamada T, Kuriyama N, Ito T, Magawa S, Azumi Y, Kishiwada M, Mizuno S, Usui M, Sakurai H, Isaji S. Role of spleen in hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury: Splenic congestion during ischemia accelerates leukocyte infiltration within the liver after reperfusion. Hepatol Res. 2017;47:E132-41. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12740.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.12740
• ⁹ Ito K, Ozasa H, Yoneya R, Horikawa S. Splenectomy ameliorates hepatic ischemia and reperfusion injury mediated by heme oxygenase-1 induction in the rat. Liver. 2002;22:467-73. PMID: 12445171.
• ¹⁰ Irie T, Ito K, Ozasa H, Noda Y, Ikeda S, Tanaka S, Arii S, Horikawa S. Splenic artery ligation: A protection against hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in partially hepatectomized rats. Hepatol Res. 2012;42:819-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.00989.x.
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1872-034X.2012.00989.x
• ¹¹ Shen Y, Qiu T, Liu XH, Zhang L, Wang ZS, Zhou JQ. Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury attenuated by splenic ischemic preconditioning. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22:2134-42. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201804_14747.
  » https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201804_14747
• ¹² Karatzas T, Neri AA, Baibaki ME, Dontas IA. Rodent models of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury: time and percentage-related pathophysiological mechanisms. J Surg Res. 2014;191:399-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.024.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.06.024
• ¹³ Seif AA, Abdelwahed DM. Vitamin D ameliorates hepatic ischemic/reperfusion injury in rats. J Physiol Biochem. 2014;70:659-66. doi: 10.1007/s13105-014-0335-2.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s13105-014-0335-2
• ¹⁴ Winterbourn CC, Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. Doxorubicin-dependent lipid peroxidation at low partial pressures of O2. J Free Radic Biol Med. 1985;1:43-9. PMID: 3939136.
• ¹⁵ Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6. PMID: 6727660.
• ¹⁶ Flohé L, Günzler WA. Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:114-21. PMID: 6727659.
• ¹⁷ Carlberg I, Mannervik B. Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 1985;113:484-90. PMID: 3003504.
• ¹⁸ Iwamoto A, Egashira T, Takayama F, Yamanaka Y, Noguchi T. Change in free radical-related substances in plasma following ischemia-reperfusion in rat liver. Pathophysiology. 2002;8:167-74. PMID: 12039648.
• ¹⁹ Birben E, Sahiner UM, Sackesen C, Erzurum S, Kalayci O. Oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. World Allergy Organ J. 2012;5:9-19. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613.
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e3182439613
• ²⁰ Estrela JM, Ortega A, Obrador E. Glutathione in cancer biology and therapy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2006;43:143-81. doi: 10.1080/10408360500523878.
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/10408360500523878
• ²¹ Hassan-Khabbar S, Cottart CH, Wendum D, Vibert F, Clot JP, Savouret JF, Conti M, Nivet-Antoine V. Postischemic treatment by trans-resveratrol in rat liver ischemia- reperfusion: a possible strategy in liver surgery. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:451-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21405.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.21405
• ²² Yuan GJ, Ma JC, Gong ZJ, Sun XM, Zheng SH, Li X. Modulation of liver oxidant-antioxidant system by ischemic preconditioning during ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:1825-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg. v11.i12.1825.
  » https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1825
• ²³ Sindram D, Rüdiger HA, Upadhya AG, Strasberg SM, Clavien PA. Ischemic preconditioning protects against cold ischemic injury through an oxidative stress dependent mechanism. J Hepatol. 2002;36:78-84. PMID: 11804668.
• ²⁴ Prieto I, Monsalve M. ROS homeostasis, a key determinant in liver ischemic-preconditioning. Redox Biol. 2017;12:1020- 5. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.036.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.036
• ²⁵ Immenschuh S, Ramadori G. Gene regulation of heme oxygenase-1 as a therapeutic target. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;60:1121-8. PMID: 11007950.
• ²⁶ Lieder HR, Kleinbongard P, Skyschally A, Hagelschuer H, Chilian WM, Heusch G. Vago-splenic axis in signal transduction of remote ischemic preconditioning in pigs and rats. Circ Res. 2018;123:1152-63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313859.
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313859
• ²⁷ Nastos C, Kalimeris K, Papoutsidakis N, Tasoulis M-K, Lykoudis PM, Theodoraki K, Nastou D, Smyrniotis V, Arkadopoulos N. Global consequences of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2014;2014:906965. doi: 10.1155/2014/906965.
  » https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/906965
• ²⁸ Yildiz F, Terzi A, Coban S, Bitiren M, Celik H, Aksoy N, Ozdogan MK, Cakir H. Purified micronized flavonoid fraction ameliorates the injury of spleen and ileum secondary to hepatic ischemia-reperfusion in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2237-43. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1018-7.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-1018-7
• ²⁹ Karabulut AB, Kirimlioglu V, Kirimlioglu H, Yilmaz S, Isik B, Isikgil O. Protective effects of resveratrol on spleen and ileum in rats subjected to ischemia-reperfusion. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:375-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.017.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.017

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  16 Sept 2019
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  13 Mar 2019
• Reviewed
  10 May 2019
• Accepted
  11 June 2019