menu menu_open
Brasil
home Sumário navigate_before Anterior Atual Seguinte navigate_next
home Sumário
MICROBIOLOGY • Cienc. Rural 47 (1) • 2017 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160476 linkcopy

Open-access Serosurvey of Rickettsia spp. in small mammals from Mato Grosso do Sul state, Brazil

Inquérito sorológico para Rickettsia spp. Em pequenos mamíferos do estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

AuthorshipSCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

    ABSTRACT:

    This study aimed to evaluate exposure of wild small mammals to spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae in Mato Grosso do Sul State, central-western Brazil. Serum samples of 68 small mammals were analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) against sixRickettsia species from Brazil. Overall, 37.5% (9/24) marsupials and 6.8% (3/44) small rodents were seroreactive to at least one of the Rickettsia species, with end point titres ranging from 64 to 512. These results suggested that wild small mammals were infected by SFG rickettsiae, and could participate in the ecology of rickettsiae in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

    Keywords: Marsupial, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rodent; Brazilian spotted fever, IFA

    RESUMO:

    O objetivo do presente estudo foi avaliar a exposição de pequenos mamíferos silvestres para riquétsias do Grupo da Febre Maculosa (GFM) no estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, centro-oeste do Brasil. Amostras de soro de 68 pequenos mamíferos foram submetidos à reação de imunofluorescência indireta (RIFI) frente a seis espécies de Rickettsia do Brasil. No total, 37,5% (9/24)e 6,8% (3/44) dos soros de marsupiais e pequenos roedores, respectivamente, reagiram a pelo menos uma das espécies deRickettsia , com títulos variando de 64 a 512. Os resultados sugerem que pequenos mamíferos silvestres foram infectados por riquétsias do GFM e poderiam participar na ecologia de riquétsias no Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil.

    Palavras-chave:  marsupial, Mato Grosso do Sul, roedor; febre maculosa brasileira, RIFI

    Rickettsia rickettsii is the etiologic agent of a severe febrile illness in humans, known in Brazil as Brazilian Spotted Fever (BSF) (ANGERAMI et al.,2006). For keeping its vital cycle, R. rickettsii needs a tick population and vertebrate animals, called amplifier hosts, which develop a rickettsemia for some days or weeks, to enable the infection of additional ticks. This mechanism amplifies the R. rickettsii infection rates among the tick population (LABRUNA, 2009).

    The urban expansion process in rural areas increases the chance of interaction of humans and domestic animals with wild animal populations, which may be infested by ticks, increasing the risk of rickettsiosis (BARBIERI et al., 2014). Small mammals are main hosts of immature stages of numerous tick species (SARAIVA et al., 2012); hence, serosurvey of these animals is very useful for predicting circulation of rickettsiae in a given area.The present study aimed to evaluate exposure of wild small mammals for spotted fever group (SFG) rickettsiae in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), central-western Brazil.

    While BSF is endemic in many parts of Brazil (LABRUNA, 2009), the occurrence of this tick-borne disease in MS has been restricted to a single, laboratory-confirmed case in Dois Irmãos do Buriti municipality during 2013 (official data from the Brazilian Ministry of Health, 2016). From 2012 to 2013, SPONCHIADO et al. (2015) performed a field study in MS, in which wild small mammals were trapped in 31 woodland fragments of Cerrado biome distributed in the municipalities of Terenos, Anastácio, Miranda, Bonito, and Nioaque, located in the Paraguai River basin between the coordinates 20o17' - 21o15'S and 54o53' - 56o31'W. The maximum distance between these localities was 162km. Because these localities are close to Dois Irmãos do Buriti (Figure 1), from where BSF was reported, blood samples from 68 small mammals trapped from November 2012 to July 2013 during the study of SPONCHIADO et al. (2015) were provided for the present study, in order to be tested for the presence of anti-Rickettsia spp. antibodies. While SPONCHIADO et al. (2015) sampled a much larger sample of small mammals, blood samples collected from only 68 individuals belonging to 13 different species, 4 marsupials (Didelphis albiventris -white-eared opossum, Gracilinanus agilis - agile gracile opossum, Marmosa murina - Linnaeus's mouse opossum, Thylamys macrurus - Paraguayan fat-tailed mouse opossum) and 9 rodents (Calomys callosus - large vesper mouse, C. tener - delicate vesper mouse, Cerradomys scotti - Lindbergh's rice rat, C. maracajuensis - Maracaju rice rat, Hylaeamys megacephalus - Azara's broad-headed rice rat, Nectomys rattus - Amazonian water rat, Oecomys bicolor - bicolored arboreal rice rat, O. mamorae - mamore arboreal rice rat , Rhipidomys macrurus - Cerrado climbing mouse) were tested. Overall, 75%(18/24) and 11% (5/44) of these marsupials and rodents, respectively, were reported to be infested by ticks, which were identified as immature stages of Amblyomma coelebs, A. ovale, A. parvum, A. sculptum and Ornithodoros mimon (SPONCHIADO et al.,2015).

    Figure 1
    Locations in Mato Grosso do Sul State, central-western Brazil, where the small wild mammals were trapped (November 2012 to July 2013).

    For blood collection, all animals were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection (dosage 25mgkg-1) of Zoletil(r) 50 (mixture of tiletamine and zolazepam, 25mgmL-1 of each), as previously described (RIVAS et al., 2015). Blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture and sera were separated by centrifugation (12,000 rcf-10min). Rodent and marsupial sera were tested by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using crude antigens of 6 Rickettsia isolates from Brazil (R. rickettsii strain Taiaçu, R. parkeri strain At24, R. amblyommii strain Ac37, R. rhipicephali strain HJ5, R. felis strain Pedreira, andR. bellii strain Mogi), following previously described protocols (HORTA et al., 2004, 2007). Fluoresce in isothiocyanate- labelled goat anti-mouse IgG, dilution 1:400 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and sheep anti-opossum IgG, dilution 1:500 (CCZ, São Paulo, Brazil) were used as conjugate for rodent and marsupial sera, respectively. In each slide, a serum previously shown to be non-reactive (negative control) and a known reactive serum (positive control) were tested at the 1:64 dilution.

    Overall, sera from 37.5% (9/24) and 6.8% (3/44) of the marsupials and rodents, respectively, were reactive to at least one Rickettsia antigen (Table 1). No seropositive small mammal showed an end point titre to a Rickettsia species at least 4-fold higher than the titres exhibited to any of the other five rickettsial antigens, precluding any inference of which possible Rickettsia species infected these animals, as described by HORTA et al. (2004). The Fisher exact statistical test showed that these sororeactivity for SFG rickettsiae was significantly higher (P<0.05) among marsupials than small rodents, what is probably related to the fact that these marsupials had a much higher tick prevalence than small rodents (SPONCHIADO et al., 2015). This condition increases the likelihood of D. albiventris being infested by a SFG rickettsia-infected ticks, when compared to the other small mammal species. Interestingly, this difference was also observed by SZABÓ et al. (2013) in the State of São Paulo. In addition, HORTA et al.(2009) showed that D. aurita can act as amplifier host for R. rickettsii, having an important role in the BSF epidemiology. Moreover, Didelphis spp. are considered excellent sentinels for BSF surveillance (HORTA et al., 2007).

    Thumbnail
    Table 1
    Results of sero reactivity of wild small mammals from MatoGrosso do Sul State, central- western Brazil to six Rickettsia species (November 2012 to July 2013).

    This study is the first rickettsial sero survey of wild small mammals in the Central-Western region of Brazil. Our results indicate that small mammals were exposed to SFG rickettsiae, suggesting that animals such as D. albiventris participate in the maintenance of the ecological cycle of SFG rickettsiae in these areas. The tick-borne agents that have been reported to cause disease in humans in Brazil are R. rickettsii (ANGERAMI et al., 2006) and Rickettsia sp. strain Atlantic rainforest, a R. parkeri- like agent (SPOLIDORIO et al., 2010). Even though it was not possible to infer the SFG Rickettsia species to which small mammals were exposed in the present study, our results highlighted the possibility that tick-borne zoonoses could be circulating between small rodents and ticks in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. This assumption is supported by the fact that these rodents were infested by at least four tick species, A. coelebs, A. ovale, A. parvum andA. sculptum (SPONCHIADO et al., 2015) that have been reported as infected by different SFG agents in Brazil, including the human pathogens R. rickettsii and Rickettsia sp. strain Atlantic rainforest (LABRUNA et al., 2004;SZABÓ et al., 2013; NIERI-BASTOS et al., 2014; KRAWCZAK et al. 2014;WITTER et al. 2016)

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

    REFERENCES:

    • 1
      CR-2016-0476.R1

    Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      28 Nov 2016
    • Date of issue
      2017

    History

    • Received
      14 May 2016
    • Accepted
      17 Aug 2016
    • Reviewed
      03 Nov 2016
    Creative Common - by 4.0
    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
    vertical_align_top file_download show_chart
    location_on
    Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
    E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br
    rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
    Acessibilidade / Reportar erro