- What is the benefit of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic nonspecific lower back pain?
-
The performance of acupuncture combined with other conservative therapies is not more beneficial than applying the same therapies in isolation
-
Real acupuncture (deep insertion into acupoints) is superior to sham acupuncture (superficial insertion at sites away from the acupoints)
-
Acupuncture is less effective than TENS
-
Acupuncture is less effective than massage
- What are the advantages of the combination of analgesics and a muscle relaxant?
-
Tizanidine (2 mg/day) + diclofenac (50 mg/day) for eight days, is well tolerated by the elderly
-
Carisoprodol has a potential for psychological and physical dependence
-
Analgesic efficacy is lower
-
The number of adverse events is significantly lower
- Which physical resources are used?
-
The use of shortwave diathermy is recommended
-
Immersion in medicinal water is not recommended
-
The use of continuous ultrasound is not recommended
-
Short waves are less effective than ultrasound
- What is the role of electrical stimulation in chronic nonspecific lower back pain?
-
TENS can be recommended regardless of physical exercise
-
Electrical stimulation is effective in the absence of exercise-based rehabilitation
-
Massage is more effective than TENS
-
TENS has the advantage to be taken at home
- Is the use of antidepressants effective for treating non-specific lower back pain?
-
Combined administration of antidepressants with adrenergic effects produces better results than the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
-
Using for a period longer than three months is recommended
-
Escitalopram at a dose of 20 mg/day is superior to duloxetine
-
Duloxetine at a dose of 5 mg/day is recommended as a first choice
- Answers to Clinical Scenario: Update on Primary Dysmenorrhea: Treatment [Published in RAMB 2013; 59(5)]
-
Is the use of Etoricoxib in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea more effective than Naproxen?
-
The analgesic efficacy is similar (Alternative B)
-
In women with primary dysmenorrhea, does the use of Valdecoxib have analgesic efficacy superior to Naproxen?
-
The analgesic efficacy is similar (Alternative A)
-
In women with dysmenorrhea, does the use of Rofecoxib have efficacy superior to Naproxen?
-
The analgesic efficacy is similar (Alternative C)
-
In women with primary dysmenorrhea, does the use of Lumiracoxib have efficacy superior to Naproxen?
-
The analgesic efficacy is similar (Alternative D)
-
Is the use of Piroxicam in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea more effective than Ibuprofen?
-
The analgesic efficacy is similar (Alternative B)
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
Jan-Feb 2014