Open-access Utilization of rice byproducts as carbon sources in high-density culture of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of rice byproducts on water quality, microbial community, and growth performance of L. vannamei juveniles. Shrimp of 0.98±0.10 g body weight (BW) were reared in 49 tanks of 1.5 m3 under 127 animals m−2 for 77 days. Rice bran, rice grits, and rice hulls were mixed into five different fertilizers varying their fiber content (90, 110, 150, 200, and 250 g kg−1) and compared against sugarcane molasses (MO) and unfertilized tanks (UNF). Rice byproducts and MO were applied in water three times a week at a fixed rate of 4.5 g m−3. Water salinity, pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen reached 43±2 g L−1, 8.03±0.32, 30.2±0.90 °C, and 5.03±0.53 mg L−1, respectively. Settleable solids (SS) were higher in tanks fertilized with rice byproducts (from 2.5±1.0 to 3.1±1.1 mL L−1) and MO (3.4±1.0 mL L−1). Total ammonia nitrogen (0.19±0.09 mg L−1), nitrite (5.97±2.04 mg L−1), and nitrate (1.29±0.48 mg L−1) were kept low without any significant differences among treatments. The concentration of heterotrophic bacteria and fungi was significantly higher in rice byproducts compared with MO. Water fertilization had no effect on final shrimp survival (85.5±9.5%), weekly growth (0.72±0.11 g), and feed conversion ratio (1.59±0.10). Tanks treated with rice byproducts, except with 90 g kg−1 fiber, resulted in a higher final shrimp BW (from 9.04±1.56 to 9.52±1.89 g) compared with MO (8.75±2.14 g) and UNF (7.74±1.48 g). Gained yield and feed intake were significantly higher for tanks treated with rice byproducts than with UNF. A mix of rice byproducts can be equally or more effective as carbon sources to shrimp culture than MO.

microbial community; organic fertilization; shrimp growth performance

Introduction

Marine shrimp aquaculture requires new technologies to eliminate and control water exchange, discharge of effluents, disease outbreaks, and overuse of feeds (Lara et al., 2012). In recent years, high-density shrimp farming under limited water exchange has been possible through manipulation of microbial communities in water (Azim and Little, 2008; Samocha et al., 2010; Krummenauer et al., 2011; Audelo-Naranjo et al., 2012). The principle of minimum water exchange crops is based on the addition of carbon sources to balance the C:N ratio in water. This promotes the growth of microorganisms that consume organic matter, improve nutrient utilization, and convert dissolved nitrogen into less toxic compounds (Avnimelech, 2007; Emerenciano et al., 2013).

Several sources of carbon have been used for this purpose, including sugarcane molasses, glycerol, vegetable sugar, soybean meal, wheat flour, wheat bran, maize bran, rice bran, and tapioca flour (Hari et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2016; Ekasari et al., 2014; Romano et al., 2018). They are chosen according to cost, local availability, biodegradability, and assimilation efficiency by microorganisms (Emerenciano et al., 2013).

World rice production in 2018 was estimated at 773 million MT, of which 513 million MT were processed (FAO, 2018). Rice is commonly produced by removing the hull and bran layers of the rough rice kernel in hulling and milling processes, respectively (Saman et al., 2019). Rice bran, rice grits, and rice hulls are the main rice byproducts (Lorenzett et al., 2012). They can contain 40% carbohydrates and moderate levels of crude protein (12%) and lipids (21%) (Lima et al., 2000; Vilani et al., 2016).

Rice hulls account for approximately 20% by weight of the seeds, generating millions of MT of waste every year (Stracke et al., 2018). These residues, if not disposed properly, are sources of environmental pollution as they are difficult to degrade (Saidelles et al., 2012). Studies have shown that rice residues can be used to improve shrimp and fish culture. Serra et al. (2015) found that L. vannamei performs better when water is fertilized with rice bran compared with dextrose. Similarly, Vilani et al. (2016) reported that in tanks fertilized with rice bran, juvenile L. vannamei achieves an increased yield and lower feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared with tanks treated with sugarcane molasses. Romano et al. (2018) used rice bran for the rearing of African catfish juveniles (Clarias gariepinus) and observed a significant increase in fish growth and feed efficiency.

This study evaluated the effect of using different combinations of rice byproducts (rice bran, rice grits, and rice hulls) as carbon sources on water quality, microbial community, and growth performance of juveniles of the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) reared under limited water exchange.

Material and Methods

Rice byproducts (rice bran, rice grits, and rice hulls) were obtained from a rice processing industry (Sucesso Agroindústria Ltda., Eusébio, Brazil), cultivars IRGA 424 and PUITÁ INTA-CL. Their proximate composition was determined according to the Brazilian compendium of animal feeding (Table 1, SINDIRAÇÕES, 2013).

Table 1
Chemical composition (g kg−1, dry matter) of rice byproducts used in the preparation of fertilizers

Five fertilizer mixtures with different concentrations of rice bran, rice grits, and rice hulls were designed (Table 2). Fertilizers were formulated to present a nearly similar value of total carbon with a gradual increase in their crude fiber content. This maximized the use of rice hulls, which have the lowest economic value among these byproducts. Fertilizers were identified according to their crude fiber concentration (F90, F110, F150, F200, and F250). The F90 mixture was composed of 50% rice grits, 40% rice bran, and 10% rice hulls (as is basis). The progressive increase in crude fiber was achieved by consecutive replacements of rice bran for rice hulls at 25% each.

Table 2
Chemical composition (g kg−1, dry matter) and texture of rice byproduct fertilizers and sugarcane molasses (MO)

To prepare the fertilizers, byproducts were first ground through a 500-μm mesh in a hammer mill (MCS 280, Moinhos Vieira, Tatuí, Brazil) and then mixed for 10 min with a planetary mixer (AR 25, G. Paniz, Caxias do Sul, Brazil). More than 85% of the total composition of the fertilizers was less than 300 μm, therefore, physically characterized as powder (Brasil, 2016). The processed fertilizers showed a concentration of insoluble residues directly proportional to their crude fiber content (Table 2).

Dried sugarcane molasses (Indumel - Industria e Comércio de Melaço Ltda., Sertãozinho, Brazil) were used as a positive control (MO) as it has been shown to act as an efficient carbon source for shrimp culture (Samocha et al., 2007; Krummenauer et al., 2011; Schveitzer et al., 2013; Arantes et al., 2017; Espírito Santo et al., 2017). Seven tanks without any direct application of carbon sources acted as a negative control (UNF).

The study was carried out in 49 independent outdoor tanks of 1.5 m3 (1.61 m2 of bottom area, 0.83 m height, with 1.43 and 1.75 m of bottom and surface diameter, respectively). Each tank was equipped with an individual water inlet and outlet. Supplemental aeration was carried out with one 7.5-hp blower connected to a flexible 0.50-m micro-perforated hose kept individually in each tank bottom.

The system operated in a static condition, with limited water exchange. Seawater was supplied biweekly to compensate for evaporative losses and increase in water salinity. Levels of settleable solids (SS) and total suspended solids (TSS) were kept at 10-14 mL L1 and between 250 and 350 mg L1 (Samocha et al., 2017), respectively. Water exchange was only carried out twice during culture, at 5% of total water volume, when SS and TSS ranges were exceeded. Thus, nitrogen accumulation was reduced through water exchange in both fertilized and unfertilized tanks.

To prepare culture water, rearing tanks were initially filled with filtered seawater (salinity 32 g L1) and inoculated with 100 L of water obtained from a shrimp nursery tank. For initial water fertilization, 10 g m3 of ground shrimp feed (Camanutri 35, Neovia Nutrição e Saúde Animal Ltda., São Lourenço da Mata, Brazil) and 4.5 g m3 of each fertilizer were applied daily to each tank at a carbon to nitrogen (C:N) ratio near 10:1 (Avnimelech, 1999). This application occurred for five consecutive days. To sustain the medium during shrimp culture, rice byproducts and molasses were applied in water three times a week during the complete rearing period. Fertilizers were applied at the same fixed rate (4.5 g m3) provided that the SS did not exceed the limit of 14 mL L1 as established by Samocha et al. (2017).

Shrimp of 0.98±0.10 g (mean ± standard deviation; n = 9,996) were stocked under 127 animals m2 (204 shrimp tank1). They were fed daily, 10 times a day with an automatic feeder (described in Nunes et al., 2019) that operated between 07.00 and 17.00 h. Animals were fed a grower commercial shrimp feed containing a minimum of 38% crude protein (Density 38, Neovia Saúde e Nutrição Animal Ltda., São Lourenço da Mata, Brazil). Meals were adjusted daily following an estimated weight gain of 100 mg day shrimp1 and an estimated 0.5% weekly drop in shrimp survival. Biweekly (days 15, 30, 45, and 60 of rearing), meals were adjusted by individually weighing ten animals per tank. Feeding rates were calculated based on the maximum amount of feed (MM, g) that can be eaten daily by one individual of a specific body weight (BW), in accordance with the formula MM = 0.0931BW0 (Nunes and Parsons 2000; Nunes et al., 2006; Façanha et al., 2018). To avoid excess feeding and a high FCR, feeding rates were reduced by 30% across all diets (Nunes et al., 2006). All rearing procedures were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines, including those related to animal welfare.

Water salinity, pH, temperature, and dissolved oxygen (DO) were measured daily in each tank, reaching a mean (± standard deviation) of 43±2 g L1 (n = 3,067), 8.03±0.32 (n = 3,066), 30.2±0.90 °C (n = 3,066), and 5.03±0.53 mg L1 (n = 3,036), respectively. These parameters fell within the limits tolerated by L. vannamei juveniles (Wyk, 1999), including water salinity (Castro et al., 2018). No statistical differences were observed in these parameters between treatments (P>0.05).

Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), nitrite (NO2), and nitrate (NO3) concentrations were determined weekly in two pools of water sampled from each treatment (n = 140) using a mass spectrophotometer (DR 2800 Spectrophotometer, Hach Company, Loveland, USA). Alkalinity and TSS determinations were performed biweekly (APHA, 2012). Settleable solids were measured every two days with Imhoff cones (APHA, 2012).

Shrimp were harvested after 77 days of culture. All animals were counted and weighed individually to determine final survival (%), body weight (g), weekly growth (g), and gained yield (g m2). Feed conversion ratio and apparent feed intake (AFI, g of feed delivered divided by the number of stocked shrimp) were calculated in an as is basis.

Microbiological analyzes were performed on fertilizers. These analyses followed the standard plate count (SPC) for determination of the concentration of heterotrophic bacteria (HB), Bacillus spp., fungi, and Vibrio spp. present in each fertilizer. For these analyzes, 10 g of each fertilizer were diluted in 90 mL of 10 g L1 saline solution with serial dilutions of 102 to 105. For the quantification of HB, an aliquot of 0.01 mL was used by the plating method in depth using Plate Count Agar medium (7157A, Acumedia, Neogen, Indaiatuba, Brazil). Isolation of Bacillus spp was performed by carrying out a water bath at 70 °C for 1 h – 30 min longer than recommended by the method (Pandey et al., 2013). A heat shock until sporulation, for the quantification an aliquot of 0.01 mL, was used by the plating method in depth using Plate Count Agar medium (7157A, Acumedia, Neogen, Indaiatuba, Brazil). Plates were read after 48 h of incubation at 35 °C.

To quantify the fungi, the spread plate technique was used, in which an aliquot of 100 μL of the respective dilutions (102 to 105) were added in Petri dishes containing the solidified medium of Potato Dextrose Agar (Himedia, Mumbai, India), plus 10 μL mL1 ampicillin and 1.8% tartaric acid solution. Subsequently, the plates were incubated at 28 °C for up to seven days. For the analysis of Vibrio spp., the medium used was Thiosulfate Citrate Bile Saccharose Agar (7210, Acumedia, Neogen, Indaiatuba, Brazil) with the spread plate technique and incubation at 35 °C for 18 h.

After the incubation period of all analyzes, plaques between 25 and 250 colonies were counted. Plates outside this interval were estimated. For the calculation of SPC, the following equation was applied: SPC = cfu (colony forming unit) × the inverse of the dilution factor × correction factor (Downes and Ito, 2001).

The effect of organic fertilizers on water quality (TAN, NO2, NO3, SS, TSS, and alkalinity) and shrimp growth performance parameters (final survival, final body weight, growth, gained yield, FCR, and AFI) were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA. The following mathematical model was adopted:

Yij = μ + τi + ϵij , (1)

in which Yij is the j-th observation of fertilizer i; μ is the general mean response; τi is the non-random effect of fertilizers, in which ∑ki=1 τi = 0; and ϵij is the random fertilizer error. When significant differences were detected, they were compared two-by-two with Tukey’s HSD. The significance level of 5% was applied in all statistical analyses. Statistical package SPSS 15.0 for Windows was used (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, United States).

Results

Shrimp reached mean (± SD) final survival, weekly growth, and FCR of 85.5±9.5%, 0.72±0.11 g, and 1.59±0.10, respectively (Table 3). No significant responses on these variables could be associated with the organic carbon sources (P>0.05). However, gained yield (g m2) was significantly higher in treatments fertilized with rice byproducts (F110, F150, F200, and F250) compared with the unfertilized treatment (UNF) (P<0.05). Likewise, a higher AFI was observed in tanks treated with fertilizers produced with rice byproducts compared with the UNF. There was no difference in AFI between MO and UNF (P>0.05).

Table 3
Growth performance of L. vannamei (values refer to the mean ± standard deviation of seven culture tanks)

The SS concentration varied during culture in all treatments (Figure 1). There was a progressive increase in SS up to the 27th day of culture when a water exchange was performed. Thereafter, the upward trend was maintained, controlled again on the 55th day by a new water exchange. There was no significant difference in TSS (485±74 mg L1, n = 49) and alkalinity (172±27 mg CaCO3 L1, n = 42) among the experimental treatments.

Figure 1
Variation of settleable solids concentration in cultured water treated with different fertilizers over 77 days.

MO - dried sugarcane molasses (positive control); UNF - unfertilized tanks (negative control).

Vertical lines indicate water exchange.

Different letters in the legend represent statistical difference in SS (P<0.05) between fertilizers according to the Tukey’s HSD test.


The concentration of TAN (0.19±0.09 mg L1), nitrite (5.97±2.04 mg L1), and nitrate (1.29±0.48 mg L1) was not different among treatments (P>0.05). However, there was a significant difference in the concentration of nitrogenous compounds (P<0.05) among the initial (1st-28th days), intermediate (29th-46th days), and final (47th-64th days) culture phases. In the final phase, TAN concentration was higher (0.27±0.09 mg L1) compared with the initial (0.17±0.06 mg L1) and intermediate (0.06±0.14 mg L1) phases. Comparatively, nitrite and nitrate showed statistically lower concentrations before shrimp harvest (5.36±2.34 and 1.24±0.37 mg L1, respectively) compared with initial (6.91±1.70 and 1.62±0.47 mg L1, respectively) and intermediate (5.89±1.80 and 1.11±0.49 mg L1, respectively) phases.

Fertilizers F90, F110, F150, and F250 showed a significantly higher concentration of HB compared with the MO and UNF treatments (Table 4). Bacillus spp. were more concentrated in the MO (9.30±1.10 × 104cfu mL1) than in other treatments (P<0.05). The concentration of fungi was higher under rice byproduct treatments with a higher fiber level (F200 and F250). The only fertilizer with Vibrio spp. was F110 (0.004 ± <0.001 × 104 cfu mL1).

Table 4
Concentration (104 cfu mL−1) of heterotrophic bacteria (HB), Bacillus spp., fungi, and Vibrio spp. in carbon sources

Discussion

Results demonstrated that a mix of rice byproducts can be equally or more effective as carbon sources to shrimp culture than sugarcane molasses. Shrimp final BW and gained yield, apparent feed intake, and water quality parameters were similar or higher under treatments subjected to fertilization with rice byproducts compared with molasses. It is likely that rice byproducts were also used as a food source by shrimp, either directly or indirectly. Rice byproducts contain higher levels of crude protein (70.0 to 115.7 g kg1) and lipids (17.3 to 85.5 g kg1) than molasses (36.3 and 14 g kg1, respectively). Serra et al. (2015) working with L. vannamei post-larvae and juveniles reported a better growth performance in tanks fertilized with rice bran compared with molasses, because shrimp consumed the former directly.

One of the possible deleterious effects associated with the use of rice byproducts is the presence of a relatively high crude fiber content (Romano et al., 2018). Fiber is considered to be difficult to metabolize by microorganisms and shrimp, and accumulation in the culture environment may take place. However, it was possible to demonstrate that the application of carbon sources using high concentrations of rice hulls, which are the most discarded rice byproduct, resulted in a higher final shrimp BW and an increased gained yield compared with UNF. This suggests that rice hulls may assist in microbial colonization, resulting in an improved shrimp performance. Therefore, crude fiber concentrations of up to 200 g kg1 with three weekly application rates of 4.5 g m3 did not generate negative effects on water quality and shrimp performance.

These results corroborate the study by Ekasari et al. (2014). The authors compared the use of rice bran, tapioca flour, tapioca byproduct, and sugarcane molasses as fertilizers in the culture of L. vannamei juveniles. The crude fiber levels in rice bran and tapioca byproduct reached 133 and 79 g kg1, respectively. No negative effects were associated with these levels of fiber. In fact, authors reported a better shrimp survival and protein assimilation with rice bran and tapioca byproduct than with molasses.

The minimum water exchange and the high shrimp density increased the amount of organic matter in culture water, which favors the development of Vibrio spp. (Ferreira et al., 2011). Although Vibrio spp. is part of the natural microbiota of shrimp, some 70 strains of V. harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus have been known to cause serious shrimp outbreaks (Tran et al., 2013). However, the concentration of Vibrio spp. in fertilizers was below levels reported during vibriose outbreaks, i.e., >1 × 104 cfu mL1 (Soto-Rodriguez et al., 2015). It has been demonstrated that the bacterial community established in super-intensive culture systems with fertilizers can inhibit the proliferation of pathogens by competitive exclusion (Crab et al., 2010).

It was observed that fertilizers made from rice byproducts showed a higher concentration of HB, Bacillus spp., and fungi compared with the UNF. This may have benefited shrimp performance through their direct ingestion. These microorganisms utilize a diverse range of carbon sources from agriculture for their growth (Thomsen, 2005). They are able to produce endogenous enzymes in the shrimp hepatopancreas (Anand et al., 2014; Panigrahi et al., 2019), likely resulting in a greater nutrient availability and improved shrimp performance.

Conclusions

A mix of rice byproducts can effectively act as carbon sources in shrimp farming, promoting the development of bioflocs and improving shrimp performance. Crude fiber in rice byproducts as high as 200 g kg1 has no detrimental effect to shrimp survival and growth and water quality when applied three times a week at 4.5 g m3. Thus, it is possible to grow L. vannamei juveniles in intensive culture under minimum water using a mix of rice byproducts to maintain water quality standards and increase shrimp growth performance.

Acknowledgments

The first author acknowledges the financial support of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) under the Brazilian Ministry of Education. We thank the staff of the Laboratório de Microbiologia Ambiental e do Pescado (LAMAP/Labomar) for carrying out the microbiological analyses. The last author is thankful for the support from a research productivity fellowship (CNPq/MCTI, PQ# 303678/2017-8).

References

  • Anand, P. S. S.; Kohli, M. P. S.; Kumar, S.; Sundaray, J. K.; Dam Roy, S.; Venkateshwarlu, G.; Sinha, A. and Pailan, G. H. 2014. Effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities in Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 418-419:108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.051
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.09.051
  • APHA - American Public Health Association. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
  • Arantes, R.; Schveitzer, R.; Seiffert, W. Q.; Lapa, K. R. and Vinatea, L. 2017. Nutrient discharge, sludge quantity and characteristics in biofloc shrimp culture using two methods of carbohydrate fertilization. Aquacultural Engineering 76:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.11.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.11.002
  • Audelo-Naranjo, J. M.; Voltolina, D. and Romero-Beltrán, E. 2012. Culture of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei Boone, 1931) with zero water exchange and no food addition: an eco-friendly approach. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 40:441-447.
  • Avnimelech, Y. 1999. Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 176:227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00085-X
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00085-X
  • Avnimelech, Y. 2007. Feeding with microbial flocs by tilapia in minimal discharge bio-flocs technology ponds. Aquaculture 264:140-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.025
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.11.025
  • Azim, M. E. and Little, D. C. 2008. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 283:29-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.06.036
  • Brasil. Ministério de Estado da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. 2016. Instrução normativa no 46, de 22 de novembro de 2016. Available at: <http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumos-agricolas/fertilizantes/legislacao/in-46-de-22-11-2016-fert-minerais-dou-7-12-16.pdf> Accessed on: Nov. 13, 2017.
    » http://www.agricultura.gov.br/assuntos/insumos-agropecuarios/insumos-agricolas/fertilizantes/legislacao/in-46-de-22-11-2016-fert-minerais-dou-7-12-16.pdf>
  • Crab, R.; Lambert, A.; Defoirdt, T.; Bossier, P. and Verstraete, W. 2010. The application of bioflocs technology to protect brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) from pathogenic Vibrio harveyi. Journal of Applied Microbiology 109:1643-1649. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04791.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04791.x
  • Castro, O. S.; Burri, L. and Nunes, A. J. P. 2018. Astaxanthin krill oil enhances the growth performance and fatty acid composition of the Pacific whiteleg shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, reared under hypersaline conditions. Aquaculture Nutrition 24:442-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12577
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12577
  • Downes, M. P. and Ito, K. 2001. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
  • Ekasari, J.; Azhar, M. H.; Surawidjaja, E. H.; Nuryati, S.; De Schryver, P. and Bossier, P. 2014. Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. Fish & Shellfish Immunology 41:332-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2014.09.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2014.09.004
  • Emerenciano, M.; Gaxiola, G. and Cuzon, G. 2013. Biofloc technology (BFT): a review for aquaculture application and animal food industry. p.301-328. In: Biomass now – Cultivation and utilization. Intech Open Science, Rikeja, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.5772/53902
    » https://doi.org/10.5772/53902
  • Espírito Santo, C. M.; Pinheiro, I. C.; Jesus, G. F. A.; Mouriño, J. L. P.; Vieira, F. N. and Seiffert, W. Q. 2017. Soybean molasses as an organic carbon source in the farming of Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc system. Aquaculture Research 48:1827-1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13020
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13020
  • Façanha, F. N.; Sabry-Neto, H.; Figueiredo-Silva, C.; Oliveira-Neto, A. R. and Nunes, A. J. P. 2018. Minimum water exchange spares the requirement for dietary methionine for juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei reared under intensive outdoor conditions. Aquaculture Research 49:1682-1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13624
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13624
  • FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2018. FAOSTAT. Available at: <http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home> Accessed on: Dec. 28, 2017.
    » http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home>
  • Ferreira, N. C.; Bonetti, C. and Seiffert, W. Q. 2011. Hydrological and water quality indices as management tools in marine shrimp culture. Aquaculture 318:425-433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.045
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.05.045
  • Hari, B.; Kurup, B. M.; Varghese, J. T.; Schrama, J. W. and Verdegem, M. C. J. 2004. Effects of carbohydrate addition on production in extensive shrimp culture systems. Aquaculture 241:179-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.07.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.07.002
  • Krummenauer, D.; Peixoto, S.; Cavalli, R. O.; Poersch, L. H. and Wasielesky Jr, W. 2011. Superintensive culture of White shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in a biofloc technology system in Southern Brazil at different stocking densities. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 42:726-733. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00507.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2011.00507.x
  • Lara, G.; Krummenauer, D.; Poersch, L. H. and Wasielesky Jr., W. 2012. Sistema de Bioflocos: processos de assimilação e remoção do nitrogênio. Panorama da Aquicultura 22:32-37.
  • Lima, G. J. M. M.; Martins, R. R.; Zanotto, D. L. and Brum, P. A. R. 2000. Composição química e valores de energia de subprodutos do beneficiamento de arroz. Comunicado técnico, 244. Embrapa Suínos e Aves, Concórdia.
  • Lorenzett, D. B.; Neuhaus, M. and Schwab, N. T. 2012. Gestão de resíduos e a indústria de beneficiamento de arroz. Revista Gestão Industrial 8:219-232. https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482012000100011
    » https://doi.org/10.3895/S1808-04482012000100011
  • Nunes, A. J. P. and Parsons, G. J. 2000. Size-related feeding and gastric evacuation measurements for the Southern brown shrimp Penaeus subtilis. Aquaculture 187:133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00386-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00386-5
  • Nunes, A. J. P.; Sá, M. V. C.; Carvalho, E. A. and Sabry-Neto, H. 2006. Growth performance of the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared under time- and rate-restriction feeding regimes in a controlled culture system. Aquaculture 253:646-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.09.023
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.09.023
  • Nunes, A. J. P.; Sabry-Neto, H.; Silva, F. H. P.; Oliveira-Neto, A. R. and Masagounder, K. 2019. Multiple feedings enhance the growth performance and feed efficiency of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei when fed a low-fish meal amino acid-supplemented diet. Aquaculture International 27:337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0330-7
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-018-0330-7
  • Panigrahi, A.; Esakkiraj, P.; Jayashree, S.; Saranya, C.; Das, R. R. and Sundaram, M. 2019. Colonization of enzymatic bacterial flora in biofloc grown shrimp Penaeus vannamei and evaluation of their beneficial effect. Aquaculture International 27:1835-1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00434-x
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00434-x
  • Pandey, R.; Beek, A. T.; Vischer, N. O. E.; Smelt, J. P. P. M.; Brul, S. and Manders, E. M. M. 2013. Live cell imaging of germination and outgrowth of individual Bacillus subtilis Spores; the effect of heat stress quantitatively analyzed with Spore Tracker. Plos One 8:e58972. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058972
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058972
  • Romano, N.; Dauda, A. B.; Ikhsan, N.; Karim, M. and Kamarudin, M. S. 2018. Fermenting rice bran as a carbon source for biofloc technology improved the water quality, growth, feeding efficiencies, and biochemical composition of African catfish Clarias gariepinus juveniles. Aquaculture Research 49:3691-3701. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13837
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13837
  • Saidelles, A. P. F.; Senna, A. J. T.; Kirchner, R. and Bitencourt, G. 2012. Gestão de resíduos sólidos na indústria de beneficiamento de arroz. Revista Eletrônica em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental 5:904-916.
  • Saman, P.; Fuciños, P.; Vázquez, J. A. and Pandiella, S. S. 2019. By-products of the rice processing obtained by controlled debranning as substrates for the production of probiotic bacteria. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 51:167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.05.009
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2018.05.009
  • Samocha, T. M.; Patnaik, S.; Speed, M.; Ali, A.; Burger, J. M.; Almeida, R. V.; Ayub, Z.; Harisanto, M.; Horowitz, A. and Brock, D. L. 2007. Use of molasses as carbon source in limited discharge nursery and grow-out systems for Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquacultural Engineering 36:184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.10.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2006.10.004
  • Samocha, T. M.; Wilkenfeld, J. S.; Morris, T. C.; Correia, E. S. and Hanson, T. 2010. Intensive raceways without water exchange analyzed for white shrimp culture. Global Aquaculture Advocate 13:22-24.
  • Samocha, T. M.; Prangnell, D. I.; Hanson, T. R.; Treece, G. D.; Morris, T. C.; Castro, L. F. and Staresinic, N. 2017. Design and operation of super-intensive biofloc-dominated systems for the production of pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. 1st ed. The World Aquaculture Society, Louisiana, US.
  • Schveitzer, R.; Arantes, R.; Costódio, P. F. S.; Espírito Santo, C. M.; Arana, L. V.; Seiffert, W. Q. and Andreatta, E. R. 2013. Effect of different biofloc levels on microbial activity, water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a tank system operated with no water exchange. Aquacultural Engineering 56:59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.04.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.04.006
  • Serra, F. P.; Gaona, C. A. P.; Furtado, P. S.; Poersch, L. H. and Wasielesky Jr., W. 2015. Use of different carbon sources for the biofloc system adopted during the nursery and grow-out culture of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture International 23:1325-1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9887-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-015-9887-6
  • SINDIRAÇÕES - Sindicato Nacional da Indústria de Alimentação Animal. 2013. Compêndio brasileiro de alimentação animal. 4.ed. São Paulo.
  • Soto-Rodriguez, S. A.; Gomez-Gil, B.; Lozano-Olvera, R.; Betancourt-Lozano, M. and Morales-Covarrubias, M. S. 2015. Field and experimental evidence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus as the causative agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease of cultured shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in northwestern Mexico. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81:1689-1699. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03610-14
    » https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03610-14
  • Stracke, M. P.; Kieckow, F. and Schmidt, J. 2018. Caracterização, tratamento e utilização da cinza da casca de arroz na produção de tinta. Brazilian Applied Science Review 2:324-334.
  • Thomsen, M. H. 2005. Complex media from processing of agricultural crops for microbial fermentation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 68:598-606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0056-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0056-0
  • Tran, L.; Nunan, L.; Redman, R. M.; Mohney, L. L.; Pantoja, C. R.; Fitzsimmons, K. and Lightner, D. V. 2013. Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 105:45-55. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02621
    » https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02621
  • Vilani, F. G.; Schveitzer, R.; Arantes, R. F.; Vieira, F. N.; Espírito Santo, C. M. and Seiffer, W. Q. 2016. Strategies for water preparation in a biofloc system: Effects of carbon source and fertilization dose on water quality and shrimp performance. Aquacultural Engineering 74:70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.06.002
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.06.002
  • Wang, C.; Pan, L.; Zhang, K.; Xu, W.; Zhao, D. and Mei, L. 2016. Effects of different carbon sources addition on nutrition composition and extracellular enzymes activity of bioflocs, and digestive enzymes activity and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in zero-exchange culture tanks. Aquaculture Research 47:3307-3318. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12784
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12784
  • Wyk, P. V. 1999. Nutrition and feeding of Litopenaeus vannamei in intensive culture systems. p.125-139. In: Farming marine shrimp in recirculating freshwater systems. Wyk, P. V.; Davis-Hodgkins, M.; Laramore, R; Main, K. L.; Mountain, J. and Scarpa, J., eds. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Talahassee, USA.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    03 Apr 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020

History

  • Received
    1 Feb 2019
  • Accepted
    4 Nov 2019
location_on
Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia Universidade Federal de Viçosa / Departamento de Zootecnia, 36570-900 Viçosa MG Brazil, Tel.: +55 31 3612-4602, +55 31 3612-4612 - Viçosa - MG - Brazil
E-mail: rbz@sbz.org.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro