Early development of two commercially valuable fish from the lower Amazon River, Brazil (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae)

Abstract

We described the early development of Myloplus asterias and M. lobatus, two fish species of the Serrasalmidae using morphological, meristic, and morphometric characteristics. These herbivores serrasalmids are heavily fished because of their commercial importance in the Amazon. The individuals were collected between 2016 and 2020 in the limnetic zone of open water and macrophyte stands in the Lower Amazon River floodplain. We tested different growth models to identify the development pattern of these species. During the initial ontogeny, these two species can be differentiated mainly by the myomeres total number, 37 to 39 in M. asterias vs. 40 to 41 in M. lobatus, the pigmentation pattern, and dorsal-fin ray numbers. These characteristics are effective in distinguishing these species from other serrasalmids. The morphometric relationships were also different between these two species, showing distinct patterns in growth between the analyzed features. An identification key for larvae of some sympatric Serrasalmidae species from the Amazon basin is presented. Our expectation is that this study will contribute to the knowledge of the initial ontogeny and the biology of fish species in the Neotropical region.

Keywords:
Fish larvae; Identification key; Myloplus asterias; Myloplus lobatus; Ontogeny

Resumo

Descrevemos o desenvolvimento inicial de Myloplus asterias e M. lobatus, duas espécies de peixes da família Serrasalmidae usando características morfológicas, merísticas e morfométricas. Esses serrasalmídeos herbívoros são fortemente pescados devido à sua importância comercial na Amazônia. Os indivíduos foram coletados entre 2016 e 2020 na zona limnética de águas abertas e em bancos de macrófitas na planície de inundação do baixo rio Amazonas. Testamos diferentes modelos de crescimento para identificar o padrão de desenvolvimento dessas espécies. Durante a ontogenia inicial, essas duas espécies podem ser diferenciadas pelo número total de miômeros; 37 a 39 em M. asterias vs. 40 a 41 em M. lobatus; pelo padrão de pigmentação e número de raios da nadadeira dorsal. Essas características são eficazes para distinguir essas espécies de outros serrasalmídeos. As relações morfométricas também foram diferentes entre as duas espécies, com distintos padrões de crescimento entre as características analisadas. Uma chave de identificação para larvas de algumas espécies simpátricas de Serrasalmidae da bacia amazônica é apresentada. Nossa expectativa é que este estudo contribua para o conhecimento da ontogenia inicial e da biologia das espécies de peixes da região Neotropical.

Palavras-chave:
Chave de identificação; Larvas de peixes; Myloplus asterias; Myloplus lobatus; Ontogenia

INTRODUCTION

Ichthyoplankton studies are of great importance for fish ecology because they shed light on the conservation status of species, assist in the determination of spawning areas and periods, and subsidize management and conservation actions related to the fishery resources (Cruz et al., 2016; Zacardi et al., 2020a; Oliveira et al., 2022). In Brazil, a lack of studies on the characterization of the early phases of the life cycle of several freshwater fish, creates the need for ecological research on this subject (Reynalte-Tataje et al., 2020).

Additionally, many fish species in the Amazon basin are synchronized in the intensity of reproductive activities and use the same areas and periods for dispersal and development of their eggs and larvae (Zacardi, Ponte, 2016; Zacardi et al., 2020b), which worsens the difficulties in the correct identification of species. Serrasalmids known as piranhas and pacus, which share the same breeding and growth sites, are among the species that present such characteristics (Zacardi et al., 2018; Oliveira et al., 2020a; Zacardi et al., 2020b).

The genus Myloplus Gill, 1896 is the most specious among the family Serrasalmidae, and currently represents the greatest taxonomic challenge because of its complex of species (Machado et al., 2018; Ota et al., 2020). The Myloplus species occur in the basins of the Amazon, Orinoco, La Plata, São Francisco, Paraguay/Paraná Rivers, and in the tributaries of the Guiana Shield (Andrade et al., 2016a; Nico et al., 2018; Silvano et al., 2020). They have great ecological relevance owing to their consumption of plant material and their potential role as seed dispersers (Santos et al., 2016; Silvano et al., 2017).

The species Myloplus asterias (Müller & Troschel, 1844) and Myloplus lobatus (Valenciennes, 1850) are the pacus common to upland clear and black water habitats (Kolmann et al., 2020; Fricke et al., 2021), considered sedentary fishes with external fertilization and total spawning synchronized with the rainy season during the time of rising water in rivers (Santos et al., 2006; Ohara et al., 2017). Although these species are less consumed by the Amazon population compared to other more important species such as the “Tambaqui” (Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier, 1816) - pacus common to lowland white-water habitats), these two Myloplus are widely commercialized in the ornamental fish trade of Amazon, mainly in Brazil, Colombia, and Venezuela (Cella-Ribeiro et al., 2016; Nico et al., 2018; Kolmann et al., 2020; Silvano et al., 2020).

Despite the ecological and economic relevance of these species, little is known about their phenotype during the early life cycle, in which less than 10% of the 101 valid serrasalmid species have their embryonic and/or larval phases characterization (Fricke et al., 2020; Reynalte-Tataje et al., 2020). Thus, our goal is to expand the knowledge on the early stages of Neotropical fish by presenting the detailed larvae and juveniles description of M. asterias and M. lobatus occurring in the Lower Amazon River. This study was based on morphology (shape), meristic counts and morphometric measurements, and estimated the growth patterns through the development in the early stages of life. In addition, we provided an identification key for larvae of these two Myloplus and including allied species from the Amazon basin. This information is essential for the conservation of Amazonian fishing stocks, by accurate identification of species in this crucial early stage of life.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The biological material used in this study comes from sampling carried out in a natural environment comprising the limnetic zone of open water (02º28’42”S 54º38’04”W) and macrophyte stands in lakes (02º43’59”S 54º35’49”W and 02º26’44”S 54º16’53”W) and channels in floodplain areas (02º12’41.56”S 54º45’42.49”W and 02º18’52.60”S 54º43’11.59”W) in the lower stretch of the Amazon River and at the mouth of the Tapajós River (02º25’30”S 54º41’23”W), Lower Amazon River, Brazil. Individuals were collected monthly throughout the years 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2020 by horizontal trawling on the subsurface of the water column using a conical-cylindrical plankton net (300 μm mesh) and a rectangular fishing sieve (500 μm mesh), like a wooden sifting screen (1.0 x 1.5 x 1.0 m area) used for sampling the submerged region of floating aquatic vegetation. Individuals in early stages such as preflexion and flexion were mostly captured in open water, while the most developed ones (i.e., postflexion and juveniles) were in macrophyte stands.

After capture, the specimens were euthanized with benzocaine (250 mg/L) and fixed in a 10% formalin solution buffered with calcium carbonate. In the laboratory, the fish larvae and juveniles were sorted, separating them from the plant material and plankton, then the individuals were identified at the species level. The larvae were identified using the regressive development sequence from juveniles to the smallest individuals, as suggested by Ahlstrom, Moser, (1976) and modified by Nakatani et al., (2001). The juveniles were identified using specific literature (Andrade et al., 2016a,b; 2018; 2019a). After identification, the specimens were classified according to their degree of development (Ahlstrom et al., 1976; modified by Nakatani et al., 2001) into larval (preflexion, flexion, and postflexion stages) and juvenile periods.

The individuals used in this study are stored in the Collection of Larvas e Ovos de Peixes (CROLP) of the Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA). Catalog numbers of the examined specimens are as follows with the number of specimens in parentheses: LEIPAI 00079 (2), LEIPAI 00080 (2), LEIPAI 00081 (2), LEIPAI 00082 (1), LEIPAI 00083 (2), LEIPAI 00084 (1), LEIPAI 00085 (6), LEIPAI 00086 (1) LEIPAI 00087 (1), LEIPAI 00088 (1), LEIPAI 00089 (1), LEIPAI 00090 (1), LEIPAI 00091 (3), LEIPAI 00092 (4), LEIPAI 00093 (7), LEIPAI 00094 (5), LEIPAI 00095 (3).

The characterization of each ontogenic period was based on the development stages and the occurrence of the main morphological events, which were recorded by pen-and-ink using the figure reflected in a camera lucida coupled with a stereoscopic microscope. For morphometric analyses, the following body measurements were obtained: standard length (SL), head length (HL), snout length (SnL), eye diameter (ED), head depth (HD), body depth (BD), snout-dorsal fin length (SnD), snout-anal fin length (SnA), snout-pectoral fin length (SnP) and snout-pelvic fin length (SnV) (Nakatani et al., 2001).

Photographic images and morphometric measurements in millimeters (mm) were obtained using a binocular stereoscopic microscope (Leica S9i) coupled with an integrated color digital camera for image capture and Leica LAS EZ analysis software.

The meristic data were recorded when possible, counting the myomeres total number (TNM), number of preanal myomeres (NPAM), number of postanal myomeres (NPSM), and the number of rays of the anal (A), dorsal (D), pectoral (P), and pelvic (V) fins. For the analysis of morphometric relationships (in percentage), the measures SnL, ED and HD were related to head length (HL), whereas HL, BD, SnD, SnP, SnV, and SnA were related to the standard length (SL). Body relationships between body depth (BD/SL), head length (HL/SL), and eye diameter (ED/HL) were established using the criteria proposed by Leis, Trnski, (1989).

To verify the growth pattern throughout the ontogenetic development of the species, morphometric measures (response variables) were related to the standard length and head length (explanatory variables) and their relationships were analyzed by different regression models (Kováč et al., 1999). The hypothesis of continuous isometric growth was tested by simple linear regression. Two alternative developmental hypotheses were also tested: gradual allometric growth (quadratic regression) and discontinuous isometric growth (piecewise linear regression – characterized by breakpoints that highlight divergent growth rates). The selection of the best model for each analyzed relationship was based on the F test, with a significance level of p < 0.05 (Sokal, Rohlf, 1981). StatisticaTM 7.0 software was used to perform regression and F-test analyses. According to the information obtained in this study and data in Araújo-Lima et al., (1993) and Nakatani et al., (2001), we elaborated an identification key for some sympatric species of Serrasalmidae from the Amazon basin during the larval period.

RESULTS

A total of 43 individuals were used for the descriptions, 10 of M. asterias (1 preflexion, 3 flexion, 5 postflexion, and 1 juvenile) and 33 of M. lobatus (19 flexion, 11 postflexion, and 3 juveniles). No individuals in the yolk-sac stage were analyzed for both species, and in preflexion for M. lobatus.

Myloplus asterias

Preflexion (Fig. 1A): at this stage, the specimen was 8.6 mm SL (Tab. 1). The presence of the yolk-sac is not evident, and the notochord is rectilinear and visible through transparency. The body is coated by a transparent embryonic membrane (finfold) that surrounds the entire dorsal and ventral regions, interrupted only at the anus. The eyes are large, spherical, and well pigmented. The mouth is functional and has a terminal position. The intestine is straight, and the position of the anal opening exceeds the middle region of the body. The swim bladder is inflated. On preserved specimens, it is possible to see a longitudinal band of pigmentation that extends laterally from the snout to close to the operculum. Punctiform chromatophores are present and irregularly distributed throughout the body, with clusters of pigments in the dorsal and ventral regions reaching the embryonic fin, in the anteroventral region of the finfold, and with sparse dendritic chromatophores along the digestive tract. There is no differentiation between the dorsal, caudal, and anal fins. Although evident, the pectoral fins still have no rays but are surrounded by a membrane. The myomeres total number is 37 (21 preanal and 16 postanal) (Tab. 1).

Flexion (Fig. 1B): in the three larvae analyzed, the SL ranged from 8.7 mm to 9.8 mm (Tab. 1). Larvae still have traces of the finfold, and the notochord is flexed and visible through transparency. The mouth remains in the terminal position and the nostrils are double. The intestine is straight, and the anal opening is vertically located and extends beyond the middle region of the body. The swim bladder is still visible through transparency. The pigmentation is like the preflexion stage but intensifies in the dorsal region of the head. At 8.7 mm SL, it is possible to visualize the appearance of the rays of the caudal and dorsal fins. The design and appearance of the anal-fin rays are observed at 9.8 mm SL (Fig. 1B). The myomeres total number ranges from 38 to 39, with 21 and 22 preanal and 17 in the postanal region (Tab. 1).

Postflexion (Figs. 1C, D, E): the standard length ranged from 10.7 to 23.4 mm (Tab. 1). The notochord and the swim bladder are no longer visible by transparency because of the presence of muscle tissue and the body is laterally compressed. The mouth is terminal, the eyes remain spherical, and the anal opening remains in the posterior region of the body. The appearance of scales on the body is observed at 15.1 mm SL. At 10.7 mm SL, on preserved specimens, the pigmentation of the body becomes more conspicuous and densely pigmented, forming brownish spots through the body, head, snout, opercular region, and base of the pectoral fin. The pigmentation pattern is observed at the proximal (basal) edge of the two lobes of the caudal fin (Fig. 1C). Pigmentation in the first rays of the dorsal and anal fins does not reach their distal portions (Fig. 1E). The pelvic fin button is visible at 10.7 mm SL and all odd fins are formed (Fig. 1D). At 15.1 mm SL, there are still remnants of the finfold; it is possible to observe the adipose fin and the formation of the pelvic-fin rays. The appearance and formation of the pectoral-fin rays are recorded in individuals from 18 mm SL. The presence of muscle tissue made the counting of myomeres impossible. The total number of spines and rays of the dorsal, anal, and pelvic fins is D. II,24-25, A. III,34-35, and V. I,6-7 (Tab. 1).

Juvenile (Fig. 1F): the analyzed individual presents 35.2 mm SL. The eyes are large, the head has a moderate convex dorsal profile, the mouth is terminal with teeth present in the jaws, and the anal opening is located beyond the middle region of the body. The body is deep and laterally compressed, with a keel forming an evident ventral serra and the presence of scales throughout the body. Despite the development of all morphological characteristics, the body shape still does not resemble an adult specimen. On preserved specimens, the pigmentation is regularly distributed and composed of an agglomeration of punctiform chromatophores covering the entire body, except for those hyaline fins, but the anal and dorsal fins present the first rays pigmented throughout their latitudinal extension, and it is possible to see the pigmentation at the proximal edge of the two lobes of the caudal fin. At this period, the pectoral-fin rays are fully developed and segmented. The sequence of appearance of fin rays was caudal, dorsal, anal, pelvic, and pectoral. The total number of spines and rays is P. I,16, V. I,7, D. II,25, and A. III,35 (Tab. 1).

FIGURE 1 |
Larval and juvenile development of Myloplus asterias: A. Preflexion (8.6 mm); B. Flexion (8.7 mm); C. Early of postflexion (10.7 mm); D. Postflexion (15.1 mm); E. End of postflexion (21.5 mm); F. Juvenile (35.2 mm). Scale bar = 1 mm.

During the early development period, the body ranges from long to moderate in preflexion (17.9%) and flexion (18.4% to 23.9%) to moderate and deep in postflexion (26.5% to 58.2%) and deep in juvenile (60.5%); the head remains moderate (23.4% in preflexion to 29.1% in juvenile) and the eyes are large (36.8% in preflexion to 36.4% in juvenile). Most morphometric measurements increased in their proportions concerning HL and SL (HD, SnL, SnA, SnV, SnP), except SnD, which decreased (Tab. 1).

TABLE 1 |
Values of minimum (Min), maximum (Max) and mean length (mm) and standard deviation (SD) of morphometric and meristic variables obtained from larvae and juveniles of Myloplus asterias. SL: standard length; HL: head length; SnL: snout length; ED: eye diameter; HD: head depth; BD: body depth; SnD: snout-dorsal fin distance; SnA: snout-anal fin distance; SnP: snout-pectoral fin distance; SnV: snout-pelvic fin distance; NV: not visible.

Myloplus asterias
Variables (mm)	Larval period					Juvenile period (n = 1)
	Preflexion (n = 1)	Flexion (n = 3)		Postflexion (n = 5)
	Min-Max	Min-Max	Mean±SD	Min-Max	Mean±SD	Min-Max
SL	8.6	8.7-9.8	9.1±0.6	10.7-23.4	17.9±5.1	35.2
HL	2.0	2.1-2.8	2.4±0.4	3.1-7.0	5.4±1.5	10.2
SnL	0.3	0.5-0.7	0.6±0.1	0.7-1.8	1.3±0.5	2.8
ED	0.7	0.8-1.0	0.9±0.1	1.1-2.5	1.9±0.5	3.7
HD	1.5	1.5-2.0	1.7±0.3	2.4-7.1	5.2±1.9	11.2
BD	1.5	1.6-2.3	1.8±0.4	2.8-13.6	9.1±4.3	21.3
SnD	NV	5.0-5.1	5.0±0.1	5.7-12.0	9.1±2.5	17.6
SnA	NV	6.8	-	7.4-16.6	12.3±3.6	24.7
SnP	1.9	2.0-2.7	2.3±0.4	2.9-6.3	4.9±1.3	9.6
SnV	NV	NV	-	5.4-11.5	9.3±2.5	18.7
Morphometric proportions (%)
SnL/HL	16.0	21.0-26.2	23.3±2.7	21.6-26.5	24.2±2.0	27.2
ED/HL	36.8	34.1-36.5	35.5±1.3	34.6-36.9	35.5±0.9	36.4
HD/HL	72.2	68.3-72.2	70.4±2.0	78.4-105.3	94.7±10.9	109.2
BD/SL	17.9	18.4-23.9	20.3±3.1	26.5-58.2	47.9±12.7	60.5
HL/SL	23.4	24.2-28.9	26.7±2.6	29.0-31.8	30.1±1.0	29.1
SnD/SL	NV	51.6-57.7	54.6±4.3	49.6-52.0	51.3±1.3	50.0
SnA/SL	NV	69.3	-	66.5-70.7	68.5±1.5	70.0
SnP/SL	22.2	23.3-27.4	25.2±2.1	26.1-29.3	27.4±1.2	27.2
SnV/SL	NV	NV	NV	48.9-55.1	52.4±1.6	53.0
Number of myomeres
Preanal	21	21-22	21	NV	NV	NV
Postanal	16	17	17	NV	NV	NV
Total	37	38-39	38	NV	NV	NV
Number of spines and rays
Dorsal	NV	7-22	15±7	I,24-25	25±1	II,25
Anal	NV	12-14	13±8	II,34-36	35±1	III,35
Pelvic	NV	NV	NV	6-7	7±1	I,7
Pectoral	NV	NV	NV	17	17±0	I,16

Among the morphometric variables analyzed, the HL, SnD, and SnA, related to the SL, presented isometric discontinuity during development, in which an abrupt change occurred from the postflexion stage. After this change (breakpoint), SnD and SnA increased growth rates (a1 = 0.47 and 0.64, and a2 = 0.49 and 0.72, respectively), while the development of HL decreased (a1 = 0.49, and a2 = 0.27) (Tab. 2). However, the variable BD was better represented by a quadratic regression with negative allometric growth (b > 1), whereas the variables SnL, ED, HD, and SnP showed continuous isometric development (linear regression) (Tab. 2; see S1).

TABLE 2 |
Values of linear (L), quadratic (Q) and piecewise (S) regression analyses of morphometric variables in relation to head length (HL) and standard length (SL) of larvae and juveniles of Myloplus asterias. R² = coefficient of determination. BM = best model, BP = breaking point (mm), n = number of analyzed individuals. Bold values represent a significant difference (p < 0.05). **The n was insufficient to perform the F test.

Myloplus asterias
Relations	R²			Teste F			BM	BP	n
	L	Q	S	Q/L	S/Q	S/L
SnL/HL	0.993	0.994	0.994	0.75	0.57	0.63	L		10
ED/HL	0.990	0.998	0.998	2.40	-0.43	0.70	L		10
HD/HL	0.996	0.996	0.998	0.67	2.41	1.62	L		10
BD/SL	0.995	0.999	0.999	24.67	0.42	11.36	Q		10
HL/SL	0.990	0.996	0.999	7.46	9.12	13.34	S	4.64	10
SnD/SL	0.998	0.998	1.000	0.25	237.00	126.00	S	9.17	8
SnA/SL	0.998	0.998	1.000	0.80	98.00	62.33	S	13.26	7
SnP/SL	0.993	0.994	0.998	0.57	4.40	2.65	L		10
SnV/SL	0.985	0.994	0.996	1.50	**	**	-		5

Myloplus lobatus

Flexion (Figs. 2A, B): the standard length ranged from 8.5 to 10.9 mm. The notochord is already flexed. The smallest analyzed specimen presents the body surrounded by a transparent finfold. The eyes are large, spherical, and pigmented. The mouth is terminal. The intestine is straight and larvae up to 9.0 mm SL still have remnants of yolk, and there is exogenous food throughout the digestive tract. The anal opening exceeds the middle region of the body. The swim bladder is inflated and visible by transparency. The pigmentation is concentrated in the posterior region of the body near the caudal peduncle (Fig. 2A). Grouped punctiform chromatophores are present at the beginning and end of the dorsal- and anal-fin bases and where the adipose fin will appear. There are several pigments near the anal opening as well (Fig. 2B). It is possible to see a longitudinal band formed by intense pigments on the snout, mandible, and in the dorsal region of the head. At 10.4 mm SL, pigmentation becomes denser and brownish vertical bands appear throughout the body. At 8.5 mm SL, the design of the dorsal fin is observed. The appearance of the caudal, anal, and dorsal-fin rays is recorded in specimens with SL greater than 9.0 mm. The myomeres total number ranges from 40 to 41, 23 to 25 in the preanal and 16 to 17 in the postanal region (Tab. 3).

Postflexion (Figs. 2C, D): the larvae presented SL from 11.7 to 19.3 mm. The notochord and the swim bladder are no longer visible by transparency because of the presence of muscle tissue and the laterally compressed body. The mouth is terminal, the eyes remain spherical, and the anal opening remains located in the posterior region of the body. The appearance of scales on the body is observed in specimens from 15.6 mm SL. The pigmentation throughout the body resembles the previous stage with greater intensity of the brownish vertical bands and grouping pigments that form spots on the upper part of the head and in the first rays of the dorsal, anal, and pelvic fins. The pelvic fin bud is visible at 11.7 mm SL, and from 12.6 mm SL, the first rays of this fin and the adipose fin appear. At 13.2 mm SL, all the fin rays are developed, except for the pectoral fin, which is still in development. There are still remnants of the finfold at 15.6 mm SL. At this stage, the number of spines and rays is D. II,21-23, and A. III,31-33 (Tab. 3).

Juvenile (Figs. 2E, F): the standard length ranged from 20.5 to 22.8 mm. The mouth is terminal, with teeth present in the jaws. The eyes are large, and the head features a convex dorsal profile. The body is deep and laterally compressed, with a well-marked abdominal keel (Fig. 2E). The individuals have the same pigmentation pattern as described above, but the intensity is greater. At this stage, all fins are developed and segmented (Fig. 2F) and the sequence of appearance of fin rays was caudal, dorsal, anal, pelvic, and pectoral. The total number of spines and rays is P. I,14-15, V. I,6-7, D. II,22, and A. III,32-33 (Tab. 3).

FIGURE 2 |
Larval and juvenile development of Myloplus lobatus: A. Flexion (8.5 mm); B. Flexion (9.7 mm); C. Postflexion (11.7 mm); D. Postflexion (15.6 mm); E. Juvenile (20.5 mm); F. Juvenile (22.8 mm). Scale bar = 1 mm.

The body ranges from long (16.2%) and moderate (25.6%) in flexion to deep in postflexion (29.8% to 46.9%) and juvenile (55.0% to 59.3%). The eye diameter ranges from moderate to large in flexion (30.6% to 36.3%) and postflexion (32.8% to 40.3%) and large in juvenile (39.4% to 40.4%). The head remained moderate (22.2% in preflexion and 31.4% in juvenile). Morphometric variables such as HD, SnL, SnA, and SnP showed an increase in their morphometric structures, while SnD showed a decrease between flexion and postflexion stages, with an increasing trend in the juvenile period. The SnV also showed a decrease in proportions over the larval and juvenile periods (Tab. 3).

TABLE 3 |
Values of minimum (Min), maximum (Max) and mean length (mm) and standard deviation (SD) of morphometric and meristic variables obtained from larvae and juveniles of Myloplus lobatus. SL: standard length; HL: head length; SnL: snout length; ED: eye diameter; HD: head depth; BD: body depth; SnD: snout-dorsal fin distance; SnA: snout-anal fin distance; SnP: snout-pectoral fin distance; SnV: snout-pelvic fin distance; NV: not visible

Myloplus lobatus
Variables (mm)	Larval period				Juvenile period (n= 3)
	Flexion (n = 19)		Postflexion (n = 11)
	Min-Max	Mean±SD	Min-Max	Mean±SD	Min-Max	Mean±SD
SL	8.5-10.9	9.4±0.6	11.7-19.3	14.9±2.2	20.5-22.8	21.5±1.2
HL	2.0-3.0	2.5±0.3	1.4-5.4	4.1±1.1	6.6-6.8	6.7±0.1
SnL	0.4-0.7	0.5±0.1	0.8-1.4	1.0±0.2	1.4-1.6	1.5±0.1
ED	0.6-1.1	0.8±0.1	1.2-2.2	1.6±0.3	2.6-2.7	2.7±0.1
HD	1.4-2.4	1.7±0.3	2.8-6.2	4.9±1.0	7.0-7.5	7.2±0.3
BD	1.4-2.7	1.9±0.4	3.5-9.3	5.8±1.8	11.6-13.5	12.3±1.0
SnD	4.3-5.3	5.0±1.9	5.7-9.8	7.3±1.2	10.7-11.2	10.9±0.2
SnA	6.0-7.4	6.8±3.5	7.9-13.3	10.2±1.7	15.0-16.4	15.5±0.8
SnP	1.8-2.8	2.3±0.3	3.3-5.1	4.1±0.6	5.9-6.3	6.1±0.2
SnV	NV	NV	6.3-10.5	8.0±1.3	11.0-11.9	11.5±0.5
Morphometric proportions (%)
SnL/HL	15.5-23.5	19.5±2.4	20.0-25.2	22.6±1.7	21.5-23.6	22.7±1.1
ED/HL	30.6-36.3	32.6±1.5	32.8-40.3	35.9±1.9	39.4-40.4	40.0±0.5
HD/HL	62.6-79.7	69.6±4.5	79.6-100.9	90.1±6.8	105.3-110.1	107.5±2.4
BD/SL	16.2-25.6	19.8±3.0	29.8-46.9	38.2±6.5	55.0-59.3	57.4±2.2
HL/SL	22.2-29.1	26.0±2.0	28.7-31.8	31.0±1.0	30.0-32.2	31.4±1.2
SnD/SL	47.2-62.8	52.6±4.1	46.8-50.6	49.0±1.1	49.0-52.5	51.0±1.7
SnA/SL	64.2-70.5	68.5±1.6	66.5-71.7	68.9±2.0	71.5-73.2	72.1±0.9
SnP/SL	20.9-27.9	24.5±1.8	25.0-28.5	27.5±1.1	25.9-30.2	28.7±2.4
SnV/SL	NV	NV	49.5-57.3	53.8±2.3	52.3-54.3	53.4±1.0
Number of myomeres
Preanal	23-25	24±1	24	24±0	NV	NV
Postanal	16-17	17±0	16	16±0	NV	NV
Total	40-41	41±0	40	40±0	NV	NV
Number of spines and rays
Dorsal	3-22	16±5	II,21-23	22±1	II,22	22±0
Anal	0-28	11±9	III,31-33	32±1	III,32-33	33±1
Pelvic	NV	NV	NV	NV	I,6-7	6±1
Pectoral	NV	NV	NV	NV	I,14-15	14±1

The variables SnL, SnA and SnV were better represented by the piecewise linear regression model, which has discontinuous isometric growth with changes in growth in the postflexion stage. Thus, SnV decreased its growth rate (a1 = 0.44 and a2 = 0.43), while SnL and SnA increased (a1 = 0.15 and 0.65 and a2 = 0.23 and 0.79, respectively) (Tab. 4). The variables showed allometric growth, with BD, ED, HD, and SnD being positive (b > 1) and HL and SnP being negative allometry (b < 1) (Tab. 4; see S2).

TABLE 4 |
Values of quadratic (Q) and piecewise (S) regression analyses of morphometric variables in relation to head length (HL) and standard length (SL) of larvae and juveniles of Myloplus lobatus. R² = coefficient of determination. BM = best model, BP = breaking point (mm), n = number of analyzed individuals. Bold values represent a significant difference (p < 0.05).

Myloplus lobatus
Relations	R2				Teste F			BM	BP	n
	L	Q	S	Q/L		S/Q	S/L
SnL/HL	0.962	0.962	0.988	0.08		58.41	29.32	S	0.75	33
ED/HL	0.989	0.989	0.991	13.56		-2.52	4.70	Q		33
HD/HL	0.989	0.989	0.996	43.85		1.36	22.88	Q		33
BD/SL	0.982	0.982	0.991	36.71		2.68	20.76	Q		33
HL/SL	0.987	0.987	0.992	16.31		-1.17	6.96	Q		33
SnD/SL	0.971	0.971	0.981	8.63		3.03	6.16	Q		30
SnA/SL	0.994	0.994	0.996	4.78		4.75	5.21	S	9.39	24
SnP/SL	0.974	0.974	0.978	4.32		1.27	2.82	Q		33
SnV/SL	0.969	0.969	0.994	2.09		26.61	17.02	S	8.67	14

Identification key for some Serrasalmidae species from the Amazon basin during larval period

1. Dorsal region of the head and the ventral region from the

isthmus to the abdomen densely pigmented Serrasalminae

1’. Dorsal region of the head and the ventral region from the

isthmus to the abdomen lacking densely pigments (Myleinae) 2

2. Anterior and posterior regions of dorsal, anal, and adipose fins

with punctiform chromatophores; presence of melanophores

at anterior and posterior regions of the anus; more than 20 dorsal-fin

rays; edge of the anal fin not convex 3

2’. Absence of punctiform chromatophores in dorsal, anal, and

adipose fins; melanophores at anterior portion of the anus only;

less than 20 rays on dorsal fin; edge of anal fin convex with

anterior rays longer the posterior 4

3. Presence of irregular pigments forming spots along body that

are intensifying through development; 24 or more dorsal-fin rays;

myomeres total number ranging from 37 to 39 (mode 38),

with 21 to 22 preanal segments Myloplus asterias

3’. Presence of pigments forming vertical bands along body

(brindled pattern) that are intensifying through development;

less than 24 dorsal-fin rays; myomeres total number ranging

from 40 to 41 (mode 41), with 23 to 25 preanal segments. Myloplus lobatus

4. Posterior part of body with large and branched melanophores

with concentrated pigments (individuals captured in aquatic

vegetation may show greater intensity in the pigmentation pattern

than specimens captured in the limnetic zone of open water);

ocellus absent at flanks and anal fin densely pigmented Mylossoma aureum

4’. Posterior part of the body without pigments, melanophores

evident smaller in regions of caudal peduncle and anus. Individuals

that are captured in aquatic vegetation have melanophores

concentrated in the anterior part of body, ocellus present in

flanks and anal fin not densely pigmented Mylossoma albiscopum

DISCUSSION

The integrative approach presented to distinguish these Myloplus species during their early stages of development proved effective. Throughout the initial ontogeny, M. asterias and M. lobatus showed common characteristics of the Serrasalmidae family, such as a body ranging from long to deep, eyes from moderate to large eyes, terminal mouth, and the presence of a ventral keel (Nakatani et al., 2001; Jégu, 2003; Ortí et al., 2008). Despite these similarities, both species have characteristics that allow their proper identification and reflect ecological and morpho-functional adaptations to the environment.

Myloplus asterias larvae in the preflexion stage do not present remnants of yolk, whereas M. lobatus in flexion still has traces of endogenous nutrition, but it has started an exogenous feeding activity. This process of simultaneous exogenous and endogenous feeding is considered a critical period (Kamler, 1992). This period provides energy reserves to the larvae, which display feeding plasticity by searching for suitable exogenous foods, which ensures survival during larval development (Bialetzki et al., 2008; Kamler, 2008; Aruho et al., 2019). The presence of yolk in M. lobatus larvae in flexion indicates that this species, compared to M. asterias larvae, has greater chances of survival and growth, as observed by Bialetzki et al., (2001; 2008) in Auchenipterus osteomystax (Miranda Ribeiro, 1918) and Hoplias aff. malabaricus (Bloch, 1794), respectively. This condition can be corroborated by the fact that M. lobatus is also more abundant than M. asterias in some environments, as reported by Soares et al., (2017) in an important tributary of the Amazon River.

The onset of exogenous feeding is associated with simultaneous events such as eye pigmentation and mouth opening (Lasker et al., 1970; Faustino et al., 2015; Santos et al., 2016). The well pigmented and relatively large eyes in the early larval stages of M. asterias and M. lobatus are essential to the efficiency of obtaining food because vision is a crucial sense for the capture of food items, as well as for enabling escape from predators (Gatz, 1979; Winemiller, 1991). The larvae and juveniles of the two Myloplus species showed characteristics related to the trophic guild of herbivorous/omnivorous fishes such as the terminal mouth, long intestine, and differences in pigmentation patterns (Andrade et al., 2019b). These characteristics indicate the individuals of these Myloplus species, since their initial stages, present a tendency to these trophic guilds.

The pigmentation in the initial development of these Myloplus can act as camouflage while using structured environments such as aquatic vegetation (Machado-Allison, 1987; Nakatani et al., 1997). However, we found no differences in the intraspecific pigmentation pattern between open water habitats and macrophyte stands. At the flexion stage, M. asterias larvae present pigments that intensify and distribute themselves as spots throughout the body until reaching a homogeneous pattern in juveniles, while in the M. lobatus larvae, vertical bands begin to emerge and intensify over its development. This variation in pigmentation associated with the meristic data allows the correct separation of the two Myloplus species mainly from the postflexion stage. These pigmentation patterns differentiate them from the larvae of Mylossoma aureum (Spix & Agassiz, 1829), which has pigments concentrated on the posterior part of the body with large and branched melanophores, and Mylossoma albiscopum Cope, 1872 (sensuMateussi et al., 2018), which has smaller melanophores concentrated in the anterior part of the body (Araújo-Lima et al., 1993).

The pigmentation pattern of the two species can differentiate them from juvenile individuals of other serrasalmids such as Tometes kranponhah Andrade, Jégu & Giarrizzo, 2016. Tometes kranponhah has a well-defined humeral spot in the anterior part of the body and the presence of weak spots in the flanks ranging from vertically elongated to circular blotches, being more conspicuous in the ventral part of the flanks (Andrade et al., 2016c). These also differ from the larvae of Serrasalmus Lacépède, 1803 that have a high concentration of pigments in the upper region of the head and snout (Nakatani et al., 2001).

The caudal-fin rays are the first to appear in several Characiformes (Oliveira et al., 2012; Mattox et al., 2014; Santos et al., 2017; Cajado et al., 2021). This characteristic is related to active swimming and movement into the water column searching for food or escaping from predators (Osse, Van den Boogaart, 1999; Silva et al., 2021). The sequence of fin formation in M. asterias and M. lobatus was similar to that observed in other Characiformes larvae – caudal, dorsal, anal, pelvic, and pectoral fins (Araújo-Lima et al., 1993; Nascimento, Araújo-Lima, 1993; Nakatani et al., 2001; Bialetzki et al., 2008; Oliveira et al., 2012). However, the number of rays on the dorsal and anal fins of juveniles M. asterias was not similar to those found by Jégu et al., (2004). This difference could be related to the non-monophyletism of these species (Machado et al., 2018).

The number of myomeres can certainly be used to diagnose M. asterias (37–39) from M. lobatus (40–41) during the first development stages, as well as the number of dorsal-fin rays in more developed specimens from 10.7 mm SL (24 to 25 vs. 21 to 23). The myomeres total number of M. lobatus does not distinguish it only from M. asterias, it also differentiates it from other congeneric and sympatric species as Myloplus arnoldi Ahl, 1936 and Myloplus torquatus (Kner, 1858), which have fewer than 38 myomeres based on vertebrae count (Araújo-Lima, Donald, 1988; Andrade et al., 2016b). Nevertheless, the meristic counts are not enough to taxonomically separate individuals of M. asterias from species M. arnoldi and M. torquatus, generating cryptic biodiversity in ichthyoplankton studies.

Myloplus asterias and M. lobatus have a body ranging from elongated in their first larval stages to deep-bodied during postflexion, which is the same pattern found in the early stages of other serrasalmids (Araújo-Lima et al., 1993; Nakatani et al., 2001). Among the Serrasalmidae characteristics (e.g., laterally compressed body, presence of a pre-dorsal spine – except for Colossoma Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903, Mylossoma Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903 and Piaractus Eigenmann, 1903; and a ventral keel composed of modified abdominal scales), the deep body characterizes the Serrasalmidae family (Jégu, 2003; Ortí et al., 2008). This suggests that there are changes in habitat use from lentic waters to lotic systems such as lakes to the flowing waters of a river. In that case, the earlier larvae stages are represented by an elongated body, which suggests less drag in the water currents, and the deep body in bigger juveniles assists in performing maneuvers in flowing waters (Andrade et al., 2019b).

The processes of delay or acceleration in the growth of specific body parts reflect adaptive ontogenetic development as a response to functional requirements (Kováč et al., 1999; Oliveira et al., 2020b; Cajado et al., 2021). In many fish species, a reduction in the growth coefficients of various organs and tissues occurs at similar body lengths and it is correlated with typical morphogenetic events (Urho, 2002; Osse, Van den Boogaart, 2004). Concerning the growth of the body variables of these two Myloplus, only SnA was similar for both species, while the remaining were different. This may a result from the low number of individuals analyzed, mainly due to the need for a large sampling effort in different seasonal periods and landscape environments to capture all stages and periods of development (Taguti et al., 2009; Oliveira et al., 2020a). The allometric growth observed in body depth indicates a great transformation of the body shape, which may be directly related to the change in feeding habits and locomotion of the species. Furthermore, the interruptions in the growth of the variables HL, SnD, and SnA of M. asterias and SnL, SnA, and SnV of M. lobatus that occurred in the postflexion stage suggest that most remodeling of the body external shape takes place at this stage of development.

In conclusion, larvae, and juveniles of M. asterias and M. lobatus can be distinguished from each other and from other Serrasalmidae by combining characteristics such as pigmentation pattern, number of myomeres, and number of dorsal-fin rays. The greatest modifications of the two Myloplus species during the initial ontogeny occur in the postflexion stage, which may result from greater interactions with the environment, such as foraging in aquatic macrophyte stands. Despite the difficulty in identifying species during larval stages, the information presented here is useful as a tool for the description and recognition of these two species of commercially valuable fish.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The LSO was funded by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq process: 147577/2020–9) granted to the Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará. RAC and FKSS were funded by the Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará (UFOPA/PROPPIT # 01/2019). MCA was funded by the Programa Nacional de Pós-Doutorado of the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES – Finance Code 001 – granted to the Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia Aquática e Pesca of UFPA (PNPD/CAPES # 06/2017). DMZ acknowledges support from the Laboratório de Ecologia do Ictioplâncton e Pesca em Águas Interiores of the Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará and Zaqueu Santos for the illustrations.

REFERENCES

• Ahlstrom EH, Butler JL, Sumida BY. Pelagic stromateoid fishes (Pisces, Perciformes) of the eastern Pacific: kinds, distributions, and early life histories and observations on five of these from the northwest Atlantic. Bull Mar Sci. 1976; 26(3):285–402.
• Ahlstrom EH, Moser HG. Eggs and larvae of fishes and their role in systematic investigations and in fisheries. Rev Trav Inst Peches Marit. 1976; 40(3-4):379–98. Available from: https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00000/1996/
  » https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00000/1996/
• Andrade MC, Fitzgerald DB, Winemiller KO, Barbosa PS, Giarrizzo T. Trophic niche segregation among herbivorous serrasalmids from rapids of the lower Xingu River, Brazilian Amazon. Hydrobiologia. 2019b; 829:265–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3838-y
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3838-y
• Andrade MC, Jégu M, Gama CS. A new species of Myloplus Gill (Characiformes, Serrasalmidae) from the Tumucumaque Mountain Range, Brazil and French Guiana, with comments on M. rubripinnis Zootaxa. 2018; 4403(1):111–22. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4403.1.6
  » https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4403.1.6
• Andrade MC, Jégu M, Giarrizzo T. A new large species of Myloplus (Characiformes, Serrasalmidae) from the Rio Madeira basin, Brazil. ZooKeys. 2016b; 571:153–67. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.571.5983
  » https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.571.5983
• Andrade MC, Jégu M, Giarrizzo T Tometes kranponhah and Tometes ancylorhynchus (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae), two new phytophagous serrasalmids, and the first Tometes species described from the Brazilian Shield. J Fish Biol. 2016c; 89(1):467–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12868
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12868
• Andrade MC, López-Fernández H, Liverpool EA. New Myloplus from Essequibo River basin, Guyana, with discussion on the taxonomic status of Myleus pacu (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2019a; 17(4):e190026. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20190026
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20190026
• Andrade MC, Ota RP, Bastos DA, Jégu M. A new large Myloplus Gill 1896 from rio Negro basin, Brazilian Amazon (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae). Zootaxa. 2016a; 4205(6):571–80. http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4205.6.5
  » http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4205.6.5
• Araújo-Lima CARM, Donald E. Número de vértebras de Characiformes do rio Amazonas e seu uso na identificação de larvas do grupo. Acta Amazon. 1988; 18:351–58. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921988182358
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921988182358
• Araújo-Lima CARM, Kirovsky AL, Marca AG. As larvas dos pacus, Mylossoma spp. (Teleostei; Characidae), da Amazônia Central. Rev Bras Biol. 1993; 53(2):591–600.
• Aruho C, Walakira JK, Bugenyi F, Rutaisire J, Reading BJ. Morphology and functional ontogeny of the digestive tract of Barbus altianalis larvae. Afr Zool. 2019; 54(3):137–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2019.1642140
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2019.1642140
• Bialetzki A, Baumgartner G, Sanches PV, Galuch AV, Luvisuto MA, Nakatani K et al Caracterização do desenvolvimento inicial de Auchenipterus osteomystax (Osteichthyes, Auchenipteridae) da bacia do rio Paraná, Brasil. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 2001; 23:377–82. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v23i0.2692
  » https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v23i0.2692
• Bialetzki A, Nakatani K, Sanches PV, Baumgartner G, Makrakis MC, Taguti TL. Desenvolvimento inicial de Hoplias aff. malabaricus (Bloch, 1794) (Osteichthyes, Erythrinidae) da planície alagável do alto rio Paraná, Brasil. Acta Sci Biol Sci. 2008; 30:141–49. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v30i2.3608
  » https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v30i2.3608
• Cajado RA, Oliveira LS, Silva FKS, Zacardi DM. Early development of the Neotropical fish known as long sardine Triportheus auritus (Valenciennes, 1850) (Characiformes, Triportheidae). J Appl Ichthyol. 2021; 37(5):759–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14228
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14228
• Cella-Ribeiro A, Lima-Filho JA, Ropke CP, Hauser M, Silva TM, Fonseca ML et al Catálogo de informações biológicas de peixes do rio Madeira. In: Cella-Ribeiro A, Torrente-Vilara G, Lima-Filho JA, Doria CRC, editors. Ecologia e biologia de peixes do rio Madeira. Porto Velho: Edufro; 2016. p.56–78.
• Cruz PR, Affonso IP, Gomes LC. Ecologia do ictioplâncton: uma abordagem cienciométrica. Oecol Aust. 2016; 20(4):436–50. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2016.2004.04
  » https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2016.2004.04
• Faustino F, Makino LC, Neumann E, Nakaghi LSO. Morphological and morphometric aspects of early life stages of piabinha Brycon gouldingi (Characidae). J Fish Biol. 2015; 86(5):1491–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12652
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12652
• Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Fong JD. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: species by family/subfamily [Internet]. San Francisco: California Academy of Science; 2020. Available from: http://researcharquive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpecieByFamily.asp
  » http://researcharquive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/SpecieByFamily.asp
• Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN, Van der Laan R. Eschmeyer’s catalog of fishes: genera, species, references [Internet]. San Francisco: California Academy of Science; 2021. Available from: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
  » http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp
• Gatz AJ. Ecological morphology of freshwater stream fishes. Tulane Stud Zool Bot. 1979; 21:91–124.
• Jégu M. Subfamily Serrasalminae (Pacus and Piranhas). In: Reis RE, Kullander SO, Ferraris CJJ, editors. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: Edipucrs; 2003. p.182–96.
• Jégu M, Hubert N, Belmont-Jégu E. Réhabilitation de Myloplus asterias (Müller & Troschel, 1844), espèce-type de Myloplus Gill, 1896 et validation du genre Myloplus Gill (Characidae: Serrasalminae). Cybium. 2004; 28(2):119–57. Available from: https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers19-10/010036728.pdf
  » https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers19-10/010036728.pdf
• Kamler E. Endogenous feeding period. In Blaxter JHS, editor. Early life history of fish. Dordrecht: Fish Fisheries Serie. (Springer); 1992. p.107–75.
• Kamler E. Resource allocation in yolk-feeding fish. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2008; 18:143–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9070-x
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9070-x
• Kolmann MA, Hughes LC, Hernadez LP, Arcila D, Betancur R, Sabaj MH et al Phylogenomics of piranhas and pacus (Serrasalmidae) uncovers how convergent diets obfuscate traditional morphological taxonomy. Syst Biol. 2020; 70(3):576–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa065
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa065
• Kováč V, Copp GH, Francis MP. Morphometry of the stone loach, Barbatula barbatula: Do mensural characters reflect the species’ life history thresholds? Environ Biol Fish. 1999; 56:105–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007570716690
  » https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007570716690
• Lasker R, Feder HM, Theilack GH, May RC. Feeding, growth and survival of Engraulis mordax larvae reared in the laboratory. Mar Biol. 1970; 5:345–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346901
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00346901
• Leis JM, Trnski T. The larvae of Indo-Pacific shorefishes. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 1989.
• Machado VN, Collins RA, Ota RP, Andrade MC, Farias IP, Hrbek T. One thousand DNA barcodes of piranhas and pacus reveal geographic structure and unrecognised diversity in the Amazon. Sci Rep. 2018; 8:8387. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26550-x
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26550-x
• Machado-Allison A. Los peces de los llanos de Venezuela: un ensayo sobre su historia natural. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela; 1987.
• Mattox GMT, Hoffmann M, Hoffmann P. Ontogenetic development of Heterocharax macrolepis Eigenmann (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae) with comments on the form of the yolk sac in the Heterocharacinae. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2014; 12(2):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20130107
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20130107
• Mateussi NTB, Oliveira C, Pavanelli CS. Taxonomic revision of the Cis-Andean species of Mylossoma Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903 (Teleostei: Characiformes: Serrasalmidae). Zootaxa. 2018; 4387(2):275–309. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4387.2.3
  » https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4387.2.3
• Nakatani K, Agostinho AA, Bialetzki A, Baumgartner G, Sanches PV, Makrakis M et al Ovos e larvas de peixes de água doce: desenvolvimento manual de identificação. Maringá: EDUEM; 2001.
• Nakatani K, Baumgartner G, Cavicchioli M. Ecologia de ovos e larvas de peixes. In: Vazzoler AEAM, Agostinho AA, Hahn NS, editors. A planície de inundação do alto rio Paraná: aspectos físicos, biológicos e econômicos. Maringá: EDUEM; 1997. p.281–306.
• Nascimento FL, Araújo-Lima CARM. Descrição das larvas de Psectrogaster amazonica e Potamorhina altamazonica (Curimatidae, Pisces) da Amazônia Central. Acta Amazon. 1993; 23:457–72. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921993234472
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921993234472
• Nico LG, Jégu M, Andrade MC. Family Serrasalmidae - Piranhas and Pacus. In: Van der Sleen P, Albert JS, editors. Field guide to the fishes of the Amazon, Orinoco, and Guianas (Princeton Field Guides). Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2018. p.172–96.
• Ohara WM, Lima FCT, Salvador GN, Andrade MC. Peixes do rio Teles Pires: diversidade e guia de identificação. Goiânia: Gráfica e Editora Amazonas; 2017.
• Oliveira CC, Suzuki MAL, Oliveira LS, Zacardi DM. Description of the initial development and temporal distribution of Microphilypnus tapajosensis larvae and juveniles in a reservoir in the Eastern Amazon. Cienc Nat. 2020b; 42:e49. https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41542
  » https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41542
• Oliveira FG, Bialetzki A, Gomes LC, Santin M, Taguti TL. Desenvolvimento larval de Brycon hilarii (Characiformes, Characidae). Iheringia, Ser Zool. 2012; 102(1):62–70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212012000100009
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212012000100009
• Oliveira LS, Cajado RA, Santos LRB, Suzuki MAL, Zacardi DM. Bancos de macrófitas aquáticas como locais de desenvolvimento das fases iniciais de peixes em várzea do Baixo Amazonas. Oecol Aust. 2020a; 24(3):644–60. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2403.09
  » https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2020.2403.09
• Oliveira LS, Cajado RA, Santos LRB, Zacardi DM. Structure of the ichthyoplankton community in a Neotropical floodplain lake affected by environmental degradation. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2022; 94(1):e20201598. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220201598
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220201598
• Ortí G, Sivasundar A, Dietz K, Jégu M. Phylogeny of the Serrasalmidae (Characiformes) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Genet Mol Biol. 2008; 31:343–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000200030
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000200030
• Osse JWM, Van den Boogaart JGM. Allometric growth in fish larvae: timing and function. In: Govoni JJ, editor. The development of form and function in fishes and the question of larval adaptation. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society Syposium; 2004. p.167–94.
• Osse JWM, Van den Boogaart JGM. Dynamic morphology of fish larvae, structural implications of friction forces in swimming, feeding and ventilation. J Fish Biol. 1999; 55:156–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1999.1071
  » https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.1999.1071
• Ota RP, Machado VN, Andrade MC, Collins RA, Farias IP, Hrbek T. Integrative taxonomy reveals a new species of pacu (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae: Myloplus) from the Brazilian Amazon. Neotrop Ichthyol. 2020; 18(1):e190112. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20190112
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20190112
• Reynalte-Tataje DA, Lopes CA, Massaro MV, Hartmann PB, Sulzbacher R, Santos JA et al State of the art of identification of eggs and larvae of freshwater fish in Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras. 2020; 32:e6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x5319
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x5319
• Santos GM, Ferreira EJG, Zuanon JAS. Peixes comerciais de Manaus. Manaus: Ibama/ProVárzea; 2006.
• Santos JA, Iquematsu MS, Soares CM, Galdioli EM, Silva KF, Teixeira VA, Bialetzki A. Temporal distribution and early development of Moenkausia cf. gracilima (Lucena & Soares, 2016) (Osteichthyes, Characidae) in the upper Paraná River, Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras. 2017; 29:e109. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x10116
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x10116
• Santos JE, Sales NG, Santos ML, Arantes FB, Godinho HP. Early larvae ontogeny of the Neotropical fishes: Prochilodus costatus and P. argenteus (Characiformes: Prochilodontidae). Rev Biol Trop. 2016; 64:537–46. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v64i2.19052
  » https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v64i2.19052
• Silva FKS, Cajado RA, Oliveira LS, Ribeiro FRV, Zacardi DM. Early ontogeny of Pimelodus blochii Valenciennes, 1840 (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae): Neotropical catfish. Zootaxa. 2021; 4948 (1):83–98. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4948.1.4
  » https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4948.1.4
• Silvano RAM, Hallwass G, Juras AA, Lopes PFM. Assessment of efficiency and impacts of gillnets on fish conservation in a tropical freshwater fishery: Assessment of efficiency and impacts of gillnets in a tropical fishery. Aquat Conserv. 2017; 27:521–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2687
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2687
• Silvano RAM, Nitschke PP, Vieira KC, Nagl P, Martínez ATR, Chuctaya JA et al Atlas of Fish of Tapajós and Negro Rivers I: Characiformes. In: Silvano RAM, editor. Fish and Fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon. People, Ecology and Conservation in Black and Clear Water Rivers 1ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p.41–196.
• Soares BE, Cabral GL, Estrella F, Caramaschi E. Two-decade remaining effects of bauxite tailings on the fish taxonomic structure of a clear-water floodplain lake in Central Amazon (Batata Lake, Pará state, Brazil). Oecol Aust. 2017; 21(3):311–22. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2017.2103.08
  » https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2017.2103.08
• Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. The principle and practice of statistics in biological research. San Francisco: WH Freeman; 1981.
• Taguti TL, Kipper D, Bialetzki A, Sanches PV, Makrakis MC, Baumgartner G et al Desenvolvimento inicial de Pyrrhulinaaustralis Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903 (Characiformes, Lebiasinidae). Biota Neotrop. 2009; 9(4):59–65. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/bn/a/xmVmM6MfZm4FhHRGmqHm5DQ/?format=pdf⟨=pt
  » https://www.scielo.br/j/bn/a/xmVmM6MfZm4FhHRGmqHm5DQ/?format=pdf⟨=pt
• Urho L. Characters of larvae what are they? Folia Zool. 2002; 51:161–86.
• Winemiller KO. Ecomorphological diversification in lowland freshwater fish assemblages from five biotic regions. Ecol Monogr 61(4):343–65. 1991. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937046
  » https://doi.org/10.2307/2937046
• Zacardi DM, Bittencourt SCS, Queiroz HL. Recruitment of migratory Characiforms in the different wetland habitats of Central Amazonia: subsidies for sustainable fisheries management. J Appl Ichthyol. 2020b; 36(4):431–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14040
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14040
• Zacardi DM, Ponte SCS. Padrões de distribuição e ocorrência do ictioplâncton no Médio rio Xingu, bacia amazônica, Brasil. Rama. 2016; 9(4):949–72. https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2016v9n4p949-972
  » https://doi.org/10.17765/2176-9168.2016v9n4p949-972
• Zacardi DM, Ponte SCS, Chaves CS, Oliveira LS, Cajado RA. 2018. Interannual variation at the recruitment of larval of Mylossoma (Characidae; Characiformes) in Lower Amazon, Pará. ActaFish. 2018; 6:17–28. https://doi.org/10.2312/ActaFish.2018.6.1.17-28
  » https://doi.org/10.2312/ActaFish.2018.6.1.17-28
• Zacardi DM, Santos JA, Oliveira LS, Cajado RA, Pompeu PS. Ichthyoplankton studies as referential for the management and monitoring of fishery resources in the Brazilian Amazon basin. Acta Limnol Bras. 2020a; 32:1–09. https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x6619
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x6619

ADDITIONAL NOTES

• HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE

  Oliveira LS, Cajado RA, Silva FKS, Andrade MC, Zacardi DM. Early development of two commercially valuable fish from the lower Amazon River, Brazil (Characiformes: Serrasalmidae). Neotrop Ichthyol. 2022; 20(1):e210024. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2021-0024

Edited-by

Elizete Rizzo

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  28 Mar 2022
• Date of issue
  2022

History

• Received
  20 Jan 2021
• Accepted
  28 Jan 2022