Open-access The Bigger, the Better: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO

Abstract

What does it take to make a coalition successful? Bigger coalitions are more likely to be successful because the GATT/WTO is a consensus-based institution and countries are informally penalized if they isolate themselves. Through a Bayesian statistical analysis, the article corroborates the above hypothesis. To further investigate the research question, qualitative case studies of the G-10 in the Uruguay Round and the Public Health Coalition in the Doha Round are conducted. These cases show that the more convincing the framing of a position, the better are the chances of coalitions keeping a large number of followers and supporters, thereby affecting their odds of success. By building a unique database and applying a new research design to the topic, the study rigorously tests theories about coalitions that had previously only been proposed but not empirically analyzed.

international coalitions; bayesian analysis; multilateralism; economic openness; international negotiations


References

  • Abbott, Frederick M. 2005. "The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health". The American Journal of International Law, vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 317-358.
  • Abbott, Frederick M. 2002. "The Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health: Lighting a Dark Corner at the WTO". Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 5, nº 2, pp. 469-505.
  • Abizadeh, Arash. 2005. "Does Collective Identity Presuppose an Other? On the Alleged Incoherence of Global Solidarity". American Political Science Review, vol. 99, n. 1, pp. 45-60.
  • Abreu, Marcelo de Paiva. 2001. "O Brasil, o GATT e a OMC: história e perspectivas". Política Externa, vol. 9, nº 4, pp. 89-119.
  • Amorim, Celso. 2000a. "A OMC e o Ano 2000". Carta Internacional, ano 8, nº 85.
  • Amorim, Celso. 2000b. "A OMC pós-Seattle". Política Externa, vol. 8, nº 4, pp. 100-115.
  • Arslanian, Regis Percy and Lyrio, Maurício Carvalho. 1995. "A reforma da lei de patentes no Brasil e as pressões norte-americanas na área de propriedade intelectual". Política Externa, vol. 4, nº 2, pp. 3-12.
  • Baldwin, David A. 1985. Economic Statecraft Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Basso, Maristela. 2000. O Direito Internacional da Propriedade Intelectual Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado Editora.
  • Bown, Chad P. 2004. "Trade Policy under the GATT/WTO: Empirical Evidence of the Equal Treatment Rule". The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d'Economique, vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 678-720.
  • Braithwaite, John. 2004. "Methods of Power for Development: Weapons of the Weak, Weapons of the Strong". Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 297-330.
  • Buchanan, James M. 1965. "An Economic Theory of Clubs". Economica, New Series, vol. 32, no 125, pp. 1-14.
  • Busch, Marc L. 2000. "Democracy, Consultation, and the Paneling of Disputes under GATT". Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 44, n. 4, pp. 425-446.
  • Busch, Marc L. 2007. "Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade". International Organization, vol. 61, pp. 735-61.
  • Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Early Settlement in GATT/WTO Disputes". Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 24, n. 1, pp. 158-172.
  • Busch, Marc L. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2006. "Three's a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement". World Politics, vol. 58, pp. 446-77.
  • Busch, Marc L. and Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2009. "Does the WTO Need a Permanent Body of Panelists?". Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 12, n. 3, 579-594.
  • Busch, Marc L., Reinhardt, Eric and Shaffer, Gregory. 2009. "Does legal capacity matter? A survey of WTO Members". World Trade Review, vol. 8, n. 4, pp: 559-577.
  • Cepaluni, Gabriel. 2006. Regime de Patentes: Brasil X Estados Unidos no Tabuleiro Internacional. São Paulo: Editora Aduaneiras/Lex Editora.
  • Cepaluni, Gabriel. 2005. "Regimes Internacionais e o Contencioso das Patentes para Medicamentos: Estratégias para Países em Desenvolvimento". Contexto Internacional, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 51-99.
  • Cerny, Philip G. 1995. "Globalization and the Changing Logic of Collective Action". International Organization, vol. 49, n. 4, pp. 595-625.
  • Chamberlin, John. 1974. "Provision of Collective Goods as a Function of Group Size". The American Political Science Review, vol. 68, n. 2, pp. 707-716.
  • Charnovitz, Steve. 2001. "Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions". The American Journal of International Law, vol. 95, n. 4, pp. 792-832.
  • Collier, David and Mahon, Jr., James. 1993. "Conceptual 'Stretching' Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis". The American Political Science Review, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 845-855.
  • Cooper, Andrew F., Higgot, Richard A., and Nossal, Kim Richard. 1993. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia e Canada in a Changing World Order Vancouver: UBCPress.
  • Davis, Christina L. and Shirato, Yuki. 2007. "Firms, Governments, and WTO Adjudication: Japan's Selection of WTO Disputes". World Politics, vol. 59, pp. 274-313.
  • Davis, Christina L. and Bermeo, Sarah Blodgett. 2009. "Who Files? Developing Country Participation in GATT/WTO Adjudication". The Journal of Politics, vol. 71, n. 3, pp. 1033-1049.
  • Drahos, Peter. 2003. "When the Weak Bargain with the Strong: Negotiations in the World Trade Organization". International Negotiation, vol. 8, pp. 79-109.
  • Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics is Global Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Edelstein, David M. 2004. "Occupational Hazards: Why Military Occupations Succeed or Fail". International Security, vol. 29, n. 1, pp. 49-91.
  • Elbe, Stefan. 2006. "Should HIV/AIDS be Securitized? The Ethical Dilemmas of Liking HIV/AIDS and Security". International Studies Quarterly, 50, no pp. 119-144.
  • Esteban, Joan and Ray, Debraj. 2001. "Collective Action and the Group Size Paradox". American Political Science Review, vol. 95, n. 3, pp. 663-672.
  • Evans, Peter. 1989. "Declining Hegemony and Assertive Industrialization: U.S.-Brazil Conflicts in the Computer Industry". International Organization, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 207-238.
  • Frohlich, Norman and Oppenheimer, Joe A. 1970. "I Get by with a Little Help from my Friends". World Politics, vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 104-120.
  • Gaddis, John Lewis. 2002. The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Pas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelman, Andrew and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Model Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John B., Stern, Hal S., and Rubin, Donald B. 2009. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd Edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  • Gelman, Andrew and Shalizi, Cosma. 2011. "Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics in the social sciences". In: Harold Kincaid (ed.), Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Social Sciences Oxford University Press.
  • George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew. 2004. "Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Science". Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gill, Jeff. 2007. Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach, 2nd Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Goldstein, Judith L., Rivers, Douglas, and Tomz, Michael. 2007. "Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade". International Organization, vol. 61, pp. 37-67.
  • Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Greenhill, Brian. 2008. "Recognition and Collective Identity Formation in International Politics". European Journal of International Relations, vol. 14, pp. 343.
  • Haftel, Yoram Z. 2004. "From the Outside Looking In: The Effect of Trading Blocs on Trade Disputes in the GATT/WTO". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 48, 121-142.
  • Hamilton, Colleen and Whalley, John. 1989. "Coalitions in the Uruguay Round". Review of World Economics, vol. 125, n. 3, pp. 547-562.
  • Hamilton, Colleen and Whalley, John. 1988. "Coalitions in the Uruguay Round: The Extend, Pros and Cons of Developing Country Participation". NBER Working Paper Series, Working paper n. 2.751. Cambridge, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. "The Tragedy of the Commons". Science, vol. 162, pp. 1243-1248.
  • Hardin, Russell. 1982. Collective Action Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Haufler, Virginia. 1993. "Crossing the Boundary Between Public and Private: International Regimes and Non-State Actors". In: RITTBERGER, Volker (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Higgott, Richard A. and Cooper, Andrew Fenton. 1990. "Middle Power Leadership and Coalition Building: Australia, the Cairns Group, and the Uruguay Round of Trade Negotiations". International Organization, vol. 44, nº 4, pp. 589-632.
  • Jackman, Simon. 2009. Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York: Wiley.
  • Kennedy, Paul. 1987. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers New York: Vintage Books, 1987.
  • Kim, Moonhawk. 2008. "Costly Procedures: Divergent Effects of Legalization in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 52, 657-686.
  • Lafer, Celso. 1998b. A OMC e a Regulamentação do Comércio Internacional: Uma Visão Brasileira Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado Editora.
  • Lamy, Pascal. 2000. "Pos-Seattle: A Vision of Globalization and of the Challenges Ahead". Carta Internacional, nº 85.
  • Lanoszka, Anna. 2003. "The Global Politics of Intellectual Property Rights and Pharmaceutical Drug Policies in Developing Countries". International Political Science Review, vol. 24, n. 2, pp. 181-197.
  • Lima, Maria Regina Soares de and Hirst, Mônica. 1997. "O Brasil e os Estados Unidos: Dilemas e Desafios de uma Relação Complexa". In: Gélson Fonseca Júnior and Sérgio H. N. de Castro. (eds.), Temas de Política Externa Brasileira II, vol. 2, 2ª edição. São Paulo: Paz e Terra.
  • Mansfield, Edward D. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. "Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Arrangements". International Organization, vol. 57, pp. 829-862.
  • Mansfield, Edward D. and Reinhardt, Eric. 2008. "International Institutions and the Volatility of International Trade". International Organization, vol. 62, pp. 621-52.
  • Mcguire, Martin. 1974. "Group Size, Group Homogeneity, and the Agreement Provision of a Pure Public Good under Cournot Behavior". Public Choice, vol. 18, pp. 107-126.
  • Moon, Don. 2006. "Equality and Inequality in the WTO Dispute Settlement (DS) System: Analysis of the GATT/WTO Dispute Data". International Interactions, vol. 32, pp. 201-228.
  • Narlikar, Amrita. 2003. International Trade and Developing Countries: Bargaining Coalitions in the GATT and WTO London: Routledge.
  • Narlikar, Amrita and Tussie, Diana. 2004. "The G20 at the Cancun Ministerial: Developing Countries and Their Evolving Coalitions in the WTO". World Economy, vol. 27, n. 7, pp. 947-966.
  • Odell, John S. 2009. "Breaking Deadlocks in International Institutional Negotiations: The WTO, Seattle, and Doha". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 53, n. 2, pp. 273-299.
  • Odell, John S. and Sell, Susan K. 2006. "Reframing the issue: the WTO coalition on intellectual property and public health, 2001". In: Odell, John S. (ed.), Negotiating Trade: Developing Countries in the WTO and NAFTA Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oliver, Pamela E. and Marwell, Gerald. 1988. "The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass II". American Sociological Review, vol. 53, n. 1, pp. 1-8.
  • Olson, Jr., Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, 1. ed. Harvard University Press.
  • Olson, Jr., Mancur. 1971. "Increasing the Incentives for International Cooperation". International Organization, vol. 25, no 4, pp. 866-874.
  • Olson, Jr., Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Olson, Jr., Mancur and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1966. "An Economic Theory of Alliances". The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 48, no 3, pp. 266-279.
  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms". The Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, n. 3, pp. 137-158.
  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pecorino, Paul and Temimi, Akram. 2008. "The Group Size Paradox Revisited". Journal of Public Economic Theory, vol. 10, n. 5, pp. 785-799.
  • Pecorino, Paul. 2009. "Public Goods, Group Size, and the Degree of Rivalry". Public Choice, vol. 138, pp. 161-169.
  • Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2010. "Eluding efficiency: why do we not see more efficient breach at the WTO?" World Trade Review, 9, pp. 629-642.
  • Poteete, Amy R. and Ostrom, Elinor. 2008. "Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management: Struggling to Built Large-N Databases Based on Qualitative Research". World Development, vol. 36, no 1, pp. 176-195.
  • Ragin, Charles C. 2007. Fuzzy-Set Social Science Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
  • Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. "Adjudication without Enforcement in GATT Disputes". Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 45 n. 2, pp. 174-195.
  • Riker, William H. 1970. "Reflections on Empires". In: Francis A. Beer. (ed.), Alliances: Latent War Communities in the Contemporary World New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Rose, Andrew K. 2004. "Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?" The American Economic Review, vol. 94, n. 1, pp. 98-114.
  • Rosendorff, Peter B. 2005. "Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Procedure". American Political Science Review, vol. 99, n. 3, pp. 389-400.
  • Rothstein, Robert L. 1984. "Regime Creation by a Coalition of the Weak: Lessons from the NIEO and the Integrated Program for Commodities". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 28, n. 3, pp. 307-328.
  • Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics". American Political Science Review, vol. 64, n. 4, pp. 1033-1053.
  • Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2005. "Making Inferences from 2 × 2 Tables: The Inadequacy of the Fisher Exact Test for Observational Data and a Principled Bayesian Alternative". Working Paper.
  • Sell, Susan K. and Prakash, Aseem. 2004. "Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 48, n. 1, pp. 143-175.
  • Shukla, S. P. 2002. "From the GATT to the WTO and Beyond". In: Nayyar, Deepak (ed.), Governing Globalization: Issues and Institutions Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Smith, James. 2004. "Inequality in International Trade? Developing Countries and Institutional Change in WTO Dispute Settlement". Review of International Political Economy, vol. 11, n. 3, pp. 542-573.
  • Stanley, T. D. 2001. "Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review". Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 15, no 3, pp. 131-150.
  • Steinberg, Richard H. 2002. "In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTO". International Organization, vol. 56, n. 2, pp. 339-374.
  • Subramanian, Arvind and Wei, Shang-Jin. 2007. "The WTO promotes trade, strongly but unevenly". Journal of International Economics, vol. 72, pp. 151-175.
  • Thorstensen, Vera. 2000/2001. "OMC: A Retomada dos Trabalhos após o Impasse de Seattle". Política Externa, vol. 9, nº 3.
  • Tijmes-Lhl, Jaime. 2009. "Consensus and majority voting in the WTO". World Trade Review, vol. 8, n. 3, pp. 417-437.
  • Vaitsos, Constantine V. 1989. "Radical Technological Changes and the New 'Order' in the World-Economy". The European Journal of Development Research, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 60-84.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 2001. "Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design". International Organization, vol. 55, n. 4, pp. 1019-1049.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 1994. "Collective Identity Formation and the International State". American Political Science Review, vol. 88, nº 2, pp. 384-396.
  • Wendt, Alexander. 1992. "Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics". International Organization, vol. 46, n. 2, pp. 391-425.
  • WTO. 2001. Doha Declarations. Available at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/ddec_e.pdf
  • Wolfe, Robert. 2005. "See You in Geneva? Legal (Mis)Representations of the Trading System". European Journal of International Relations, vol. 11, n. 3, pp. 339-365.
  • Zangl, Bernhard. 2008. "Judicialization Matters! A Comparison of Dispute Settlement Under GATT and the WTO". International Studies Quarterly, vol. 52, pp. 825-854.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    20 Aug 2013
  • Date of issue
    2012

History

  • Received
    Dec 2011
  • Accepted
    Aug 2012
location_on
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política Rua da Matriz, 82 - Botafogo, CEP 22260-100, Telefone: (55 21) 9320-4871 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: bpsrabcp@gmail.com
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro