Phylogeography of msp4 genotypes of Anaplasma marginale in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal

Filogeografia de genótipos msp4 de Anaplasma marginale em gado de corte no Pantanal brasileiro

Abstract

The msp4 gene of A. marginale is unicodon, stable and mostly homogeneous, being considered as a useful marker for phylogeographic characterization of this bacterium. The objective of this work was to analyze the phylogeography of A. marginale based on the msp4 gene in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal, compared to those found in other regions worldwide. The blood samples investigated were collected from 400 animals (200 cows and 200 calves) reared in five extensive breeding farms in this region. The results indicated that of the evaluated samples, 56.75% (227/400) were positive for A. marginale based on the msp1β gene by quantitatitve PCR (qPCR), while 8.37% (19/227) were positive for the msp4 gene in the conventional PCR. In the Network distance analysis, 14 sequences from the Brazilian Pantanal were grouped into a single group with those from Thailand, India, Spain, Colombia, Parana (Brazil), Mexico, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Australia, Italy and Minas Gerais (Brazil). Among 68 sequences from Brazil and the world, 15 genotypes were present while genotype number one (#1) was the most distributed worldwide. Both Splitstree and network analyses showed that the A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal showed low polymorphism, with the formation of one genogroup phylogenetically related to those found in ruminants from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia.

Keywords:  Bovine anaplasmosis; geographic distribution; msp4; nelores

Resumo

O gene msp4 de A. marginale é unicodon, estável e pouco heterogêneo, sendo considerado como um marcador útil para caracterização filogeográfica desta bactéria. Este trabalho teve como objetivo analisar a filogeografia de A. marginale com base no gene msp4 em bovinos de corte do Pantanal Brasileiro, comparativamente a outra regiões do mundo. Alíquotas de sangue foram colhidas de 400 bovinos (200 vacas e 200 bezerros) em cinco propriedades de cria e recria extensiva. Como resultado, 56,75% (227/400) mostraram-se positivas para A. marginale pela qPCR para o gene msp1β e destas, 8,37% (19/227) amostras foram positivas na PCR convencional para o gene msp4. Na análise de distância Network, 14 sequências do Pantanal brasileiro foram agrupadas em um único grupo com as da Thailândia, Índia, Espanha, Colômbia, Paraná (Brasil), México, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Austrália, Italia e Minas Gerais (Brasil). Dentre 68 sequências do Brasil e do mundo, constatou-se a presença de 15 genótipos, sendo o genótipo número um (#1) o mais distribuído. As sequências msp4 de A. marginale detectadas em bovinos de corte no Pantanal brasileiro apresentaram baixo polimorfismo com formação de dois genogrupos filogeneticamente relacionados àqueles encontrados em ruminantes de países das América do Sul e Central, Europa e Ásia.

Palavras-chave:  Anaplasmose bovina; distribuição geográfica; msp4; nelores

Introduction

Anaplasma marginale is an intra-erythrocyte bacterium that infects cattle causing the affected animals to gain little weight, reduced milk production, abortion, incurring in treatment expenses and mortality, being, therefore responsible for great economic losses worldwide (KOCAN et al., 2003). Brazil is considered endemic to A. marginale because the molecular prevalence in domestic ruminants can vary from 7.5% to 100% (SILVA et al., 2016).

Among the main beef producing regions, the municipality of Corumbá in the Brazilian Pantanal region has the second largest cattle population in Brazil, with 1.9 million animals (ALHO, 2005; ABREU et al., 2008). The Pantanal is the largest wetland of the world, occupying areas in Brazil, Paraguay and Bolivia, whose main economic activity is the extensive production of beef cattle (ABREU et al., 2008).

The genetic characterization of A. marginale has been crucial for the development and implementation of epidemiological studies and strategies for controlling bovine anaplasmosis. In this regard, major surface proteins (MSPs) of A. marginale involved in the interaction with vertebrate host cells and vector ticks have been used as genetic markers for characterizing the strains of said agent around the world (PALMER et al., 1999; CABEZAS-CRUZ et al., 2013). Sequences of the msp4 gene, which is responsible for encoding the MSP4 immunogenic protein (MOLAD et al., 2009), showed phylogeographic relationships among the A. marginale isolates from Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and India, suggesting similar evolutionary processes among these isolates (DE LA FUENTE et al., 2004; GEORGE et al., 2017).

Although studies on the diversity of A. marginale strains based on the msp1α gene have been conducted in dairy herds in several Brazilian states, such as Paraná (VIDOTTO et al., 2006; BAÊTA et al., 2015; SILVA et al., 2015), Minas Gerais (POHL et al., 2013), São Paulo (MACHADO et al., 2015; SILVA et al., 2016), and Goiás (Mambaí) (MACHADO et al., 2015), phylogeographic studies of A. marginale isolates based on the msp4 gene are scarce in Brazil.

Therefore, this work aimed at analyzing the phylogeography of Brazilian A. marginale isolates based on the msp4 gene in order to understand the genetic characteristics of this bacterium population in Brazil compared to other regions of the world.

Materials and Methods

Animals and study area

We sampled beef cattle (Bos taurus indicus) from five breeding and rearing farms in the Central Region of the Pantanal Sul Matogrossense, in the Nhecolândia Sub-region (Table 1). For this purpose, blood samples were collected from 400 animals (200 cows and 200 calves) for a cross-sectional study approved by the National Council for Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (CEUA, FCAV, UNESP, Protocol No. 12375/15)

Table 1
Studied farms and number (n) of beef cattle (cows and calves) sampled between August 2016 and April 2017 in the Brazilian Pantanal.

Farm	Latitude	Longitude	Cows (n)	Calves (n)	Total (n)
*Farm A	19° 08' 34” S	56° 47' 35”W	45	53	98
*Farm S	19° 16' 27” S	56° 38' 16” W	42	41	83
* Farm P	18° 54' 26” S	56° 31' 23” W	39	41	80
** Farm N	19° 15' 08” S	57° 03' 44” W	38	34	72
**Farm C	19° 09' 19” S	57° 50' 42” W	36	31	67
Total			200	200	400

• ^*
  First sampling (August/2016);
• ^**
  Second sampling (April/2017).

Blood sampling

Whole blood samples were collected directly from the caudal vein, stored in EDTA (Ethylenediamine Tetra - Sodium Acetic Acid 300 mmol/L) anticoagulant tubes and used for DNA extraction and subsequent Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR).

DNA extraction

The DNA from bovine whole blood samples was extracted following the protocol previously described by Kuramae-Izioka (1997).

Amplification reaction for the mammal-endogenous glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gapdh)

To verify the presence of inhibitors in the DNA samples, a standard PCR assay for the mammal endogenous gapdh gene was performed, following the protocol previously established by Birkenheuer et al. (2003).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for A. marginale (msp1β gene)

The samples positive for A. marginale in the conventional PCR based on the gapdh gene were also submitted to quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) based on the msp1β gene, according to the protocol described by Carelli et al. (2007), with modifications (SOUZA RAMOS et al., 2019).

Conventional PCR (cPCR) for A. marginale based on the msp4 gene

The samples positive for A. marginale in qPCR were submitted to cPCR based on the msp4 gene, using a protocol previously described by De la Fuente et al. (2002). The reaction with a final volume of 25 μL contained 5 μL of genomic DNA, 10X concentrated buffer, 0.75 mM MgCl₂, 1.25 μM of each primer oligonucleotide the msp45- (5’-GGGAGCTCCTATGAATTACAGAGAATTGTTTAC-3’) and msp43- (5’-CCGGATCCTTAGCTGAACAGGAATCTTGC -3’) (Integrated DNA Technologies®, Cedar Rapids, USA), 0.2 μM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), 0.1 U Taq DNA Polymerase Platinum (Thermofisher Scientific®, Carlsbad, California, USA) and sterile ultra-pure water (Nuclease-Free Water, Promega®, Madison, Wisconsin, USA) q.s.p. The used thermal sequence comprised initial denaturation at 94 °C for 30 seconds, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 1 minute, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes.

Purification and sequencing of amplified products

The amplified products were purified with Silica Bead DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Scientific®, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The sequencing of the purified products was performed using an automated system based on the dideoxynucleotide chain termination method (SANGER et al., 1977). The process was carried out using the ABI PRISM 3700 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystem®, Foster City, CA, USA), in the Technology Department of the College of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences (FCAV/UNESP), Center for Biological Resources and Genomic Biology (CREBIO), using the same oligonucleotides employed in the cPCR assay for detecting A. marginale based on the msp4 gene (1733F and 2957R2) (Integrated DNA Technologies®, Cedar Rapids, USA).

Analysis of the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the A. marginale msp4 gene

Sequencing analysis was performed by the Phred/Phrap/Consed software (EWING & GREEN, 1998), which evaluates the electropherograms generated in the sequencing, observing the quality of the peaks corresponding to each sequenced base and assigning an error probability to each one of the samples. Bases with Phred-quality above 20 were used in the subsequent genotype analyses. The consensus sequences were also generated by Phred/Phrap/Consed. The BLASTn software (ALTSCHUL et al., 1990) was used to compare the identity of the obtained nucleotide sequences with those stored in the international databases (GenBank) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) (BENSON et al., 2002).

Genotype diversity

The alignment of nucleotide sequences of the msp4 gene obtained in the present study was used to calculate the nucleotide diversity (π), polymorphism level (genotype diversity - [DH]), number of genotypes (h) and mean number of nucleotide differences (K) using the DnaSP v5 software (LIBRADO & ROZAS, 2009).

Nucleotide distance analysis

The network distance analysis of the msp4 sequences detected in the present study was conducted together with 54 other sequences from several regions of the world and retrieved from GenBank, using the Splitstree software with the Neighbor-Net and Uncorrected p-distance parameters. The popART software was also used (LEIGH & BRYANT, 2015).

Results

Conventional PCR (cPCR) for mammal-gapdh endogenous gene

All 400 DNA samples extracted from bovine blood were positive for the mammal-endogenous gene (gapdh) in the cPCR, discarding the occurrence of false negative results due to PCR inhibitors. The assay was performed after the spectrophotometric evaluation of the average concentration and absorbance ratios (260/280 and 260/230 nm) of the extracted DNA samples, which assumed values of 25.14 ng/μL, (SD ± 10.14), 1.8 nm (SD ± 0.12), and 1.33 nm (SD ± 0.56), respectively.

Frequency of A. marginale positive animals in qPCR based on the msp1β gene

Out of the 400 cPCR positive samples for the endogenous gene (gapdh), 56.75% (227/400) were positive for A. marginale in qPCR based on the msp1β gene, of which 39.20% (89/227) were cows and 60.79% (138/227), calves.

cPCR for the A. marginale msp4 gene

Of the animals positive in the qPCR, 8.37% (19/227) samples were positive for the msp4 gene. A total of 14 were sequenced based on the intensity of the DNA bands on agarose gel, 4 cows and 10 calves from Farm A. The rickettsesia of positive animals (number of msp1β copies/μL of blood) ranged from 4.42 x 10⁴ (MS13-calf) to 8.33 x 10⁹ (MS1-cow) (Table 2).

Table 2
Samples of cows and calves (n = 14) from the Brazilian Pantanal, cPCR positive for the Anaplasma marginale msp4 gene with their respective tag and quantity (qPCR based on the msp1β gene).

Sample	Label	Farm	Absolute Quantification vy qPCR (msp1β/ μL)
MS1	V3	Farm A	8.33x109
MS2	V8	Farm A	1.97x105
MS3	V10	Farm A	2,20x106
MS4	B1	Farm A	5.25x105
MS5	B2	Farm A	1.86x105
MS6	B3	Farm A	9.53x105
MS7	B8	Farm A	6.86x105
MS8	B10	Farm A	PM
MS9	B33	Farm A	1.52x106
MS10	B37	Farm A	1.57x106
MS11	B42	Farm A	PM*
MS12	B44	Farm A	PM*
MS13	B46	Farm A	4.42x104
MS14	V14	Farm A	PM*

• PM* = Positive for the Monte Carlo effect (with low DNA template).

Anaplasma marginale genotypes based on the msp4 gene

Among the 14 nucleotide sequences of the msp4 gene obtained in the present study, 1 genotype were identified, with π = 0.00024 ± 0.0020 DH = 0.1429 ± 0.00011029 and K = 0.14286. Among the 68 msp4 gene sequences analyzed (corresponding to those detected in the present study and others retrieved from the GenBank), 15 genotypes were identified, with a polymorphism of DH = 0.6558 ± 0.062 and K = 2.44 (Table 3).

Table 3
Polymorphism and genetic diversity of Anaplasma marginale msp4 sequences detected in beef cattle sampled in the Brazilian Pantanal and in conjunction with those obtained via GenBank.

Species (target gene)	PB	N	VS	GC%	H	DH (MEAN ± SD)	π (MEAN ± SD)	K
Anaplasma marginale Pantanal (msp4)	656	14	1	0.484	1	0.1429 ± 0.00011029	0.00024 ± 0,0020	0.14286
Anaplasma marginale World (msp4)	639	68	13	48.4	15	0.6558 ± 0.062	0.00991 ± 0.00123	2.44

• PB = size of the nucleotide fragment; N = number of analyzed sequences; VS = number of variable sites; GC = G × C content; H = number of genotypes; DH = diversity of genotypes; SD = standard deviation; π = nucleotide diversity (per site = PI); K = mean number of nucleotide difference.

Nucleotide distance analysis and genotype network

The distance analysis using Splitstree software with the “Neighbor-Net” and “Uncorrected p-distance” parameters showed that the 14 msp4 sequences of A. marginale detected in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal were grouped into a single group with those previously detected in Thailand, India, Spain, Colombia, Parana (Brazil), Mexico, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Australia, Italy and Minas Gerais (Brazil) (Figure 1). In the Brazilian Pantanal, only one genotype (#1) was found. The analysis of the 68 sequences by the software DnaSP v5 indicated 15 genotypes, being genotype #1 the most distributed, since it has been detected in cattle in 12 countries (Brazil [Pantanal-MS, Minas Gerais and Paraná], Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Argentina, Thailand, China, Portugal, Italy, Spain, Australia and India), followed by genotype #8 detected in 5 countries (Sudan, Japan, South_Africa, Spain, Australia), genotype #5 found in 4 countries (Switzerland, Italy, Turkey and Israel), and genotype #6 found in cattle from 2 countries (USA and Iran). Genotype #1, corresponding to the majority (57.35%; 39/68) of the msp4 sequences detected in cattle in the world and also the only one found in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal, showed to be related to genotypes #3, #4 and #11, respectively, detected in cattle in Mexico, Italy and Mexico. Genotype #1 showed to be distant from genotypes #7 and #10, detected in cattle from the USA and Sudan, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 1
Distance analysis using the Splitstree software with the “Neighbor-Net” and “Uncorrected p-distance” parameters. Sequences of the msp4 gene from the Brazilian Pantanal formed a clade with sequences from Thailand, India, Spain, Colombia, Parana (Brazil), Mexico, Portugal, Argentina, China, Venezuela, Australia, Italy and Minas Gerais (Brazil).

Figure 2
A network of Anaplasma marginale msp4 genotypes (Hap) detected in beef cattle sampled in the Brazilian Pantanal together with those obtained from the GenBank. Black spots represent median-vectors. Small traits between one genotype and another represent mutational events.

Discussion

Herein, the qPCR assay based on the msp1β gene was chose for the screening for A. marginale in beef cattle blood samples collected in the Brazilian Pantanal due to its high reprodutibility, specificity and sensitivity (10¹ DNA copies/10 μl of standard DNA and erythrocytes infected with 3 × 10¹ A. marginale / mL) (CARELLI et al., 2007; SOUZA RAMOS et al., 2019). Therefore, the incongruent results found between the qPCR and cPCR assays used in the present study, based on msp1β and msp4 genes, respectively, are mainly due to the highest sensitivity of the former compared to the latter.

The A. marginale msp4 gene has been proposed as a molecular marker for studying the phylogeography of this agent (DE LA FUENTE et al., 2001; GEORGE et al., 2017; MOLAD et al., 2009; VIDOTTO et al., 2006). The present study showed that A. marginale msp4 genotypes detected in beef cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal are phylogeographically related to those circulating in countries from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia. De la Fuente et al. (2002, 2003, 2004) reported that analyses based on the msp4 gene provide phylogenetic and phylogeographic information and data on the A. marginale samples. Jaimes-Dueñez et al. (2018) analyzed A. marginale samples phylogeographically and detected, in a longitudinal study with dairy cattle, that Colombian isolates were highly correlated with Mexican, Brazilian, Venezuelan, European and Asian isolates, suggesting a high genetic similarity between the strains from Mexico and South American countries. Vidotto et al. (2006) verified a high similarity between A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in dairy cattle in Paraná and those from the USA, Europe, and Asia.

Vidotto et al. (2006) reported that the phylogeographic distribution of the A. marginale strains was better demonstrated and more uniform when the msp4 gene was analyzed compared to the msp1α gene. Recently, Souza Ramos et al. (2019) identified 14 A. marginale msp1α strains in the same studied region, with eight never before described in the literature, showing a high genetic diversity of this agent based on a fast-evolving gene.

In this study, the msp4 gene was considered as a stable marker for the phylogenetic characterization of A. marginale samples, corroborating with De la Fuente et al. (2004). The 14 Pantanal msp4 sequences clustered into one genotype (#1), which represented the most frequent genotype detected around the world. In total, 15 A. marginale msp4 genotypes were discriminated in the genotype network, which was performed with sequences detected in the present study together with others retrieved from GenBank and found in other regions of the world. Belkahia et al. (2015) reported that this heterogeneity could be partially explained by the importation of live cattle and/or the spread of infected ticks. Estrada-Peña et al. (2009) and Rodríguez-Vivas et al. (2014) suggested that the environmental conditions of each country could modulate the geographical distribution of genotypes, although studies related to the evolutionary history and epidemiological characteristics of these genotypes are still necessary to determine their importance for livestock.

Considering that msp4 is a conservative gene, it would be expected low values of variable sites (VS), diversity of genotypes (DH), nucleotide diversity (π), and mean number of nucleotide difference (K) when a population of A. marginale genotypes would be evaluated in a certain geographic region. Interestingly, when A. marginale genotypes found in different countries were evaluated, higher values of genetic diversity were observed, showing an increase of 17 times in the mean number of nucleotide difference, and 41 times in the nucleotide diversity, with 13 variable sites. This finding might be associated with the different degrees of selection pressure imposed to the pathogen in each locality around the world. Albeit with low number when compared to more evolving genes (such as msp1α), the occurrence of mutational events throughout the evolutive history of A. marginale can be seen in genotype network presented in this manuscript. Future studies aiming at unravelling the “missed genotypes”, represented by median-vectors in the genotype network, in Brazil and other parts of the world, are much needed aiming at elucidating the evolutionary history of A. marginale msp4 genotypes.

Conclusion

The A. marginale msp4 sequences detected in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal showed low polymorphism. The only one A. marginale msp4 genotype detected in cattle from the Brazilian Pantanal was phylogeographically related to those found in ruminants from South and Central America, Europe, and Asia. Studies related to the evolutionary history and epidemiological characteristics of these genotypes are still necessary to determine their importance for livestock.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Graduate Program in Veterinary Medicine, Concentration in Animal Pathology (Universidade Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Jaboticabal), The FAPESP (Foundation for Research Support State of São Paulo - Process 2015/14896-1), FUNDECT (Foundation for Support to the Development of Education, Science and Technology of the State of Mato Grosso do Sul. Process 59/300.187/2016) and CNPq (2014/401.403.120.16-5) for the financial and technical support for conducting this research and for the Productivity grant given to MRA (CNPq Process #302420/2017-7). The present study was carried out with the support of the Coordination of Improvement of Higher-Level Personnel-Brazil (CAPES) - Financing Code 001.

References

• Abreu UGP, Gomes EG, Lopes PS, Torres RA, Santos HN. Avaliação sistêmica da introdução de tecnologias na pecuária de gado de corte do Pantanal por meio de modelos de análise envoltória de dados (DEA). Rev Bras Zootec 2008; 37(11): 2069-2076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001100025
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001100025
• Alho CJR. The Pantanal. In: Fraser LH, Keddy PA, editors. The world’s largest Wetlands: ecology and conservation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 203-271.
• Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215(3): 403-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 PMid:2231712.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
• Baêta BA, Ribeiro ACC, Teixeira ARC, Cabezas-Cruz A, Passos LMF, Zweygarth E, et al. Characterization of two strains of Anaplasma marginale isolated from cattle in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, after propagation in tick cell culture. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015; 6(2): 141-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.11.003 PMid:25468764.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.11.003
• Belkahia H, Ben Said M, Alberti A, Abdi K, Issaoui Z, Hattab D, et al. First molecular survey and novel genetic variants’ identification of Anaplasma marginale, A. centrale and A. bovis in cattle from Tunisia. Infect Genet Evol 2015; 34: 361-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.017 PMid:26117444.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2015.06.017
• Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Rapp BA, Wheeler DI. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30(1): 17-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.17 PMid:11752243.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.17
• Birkenheuer AJ, Levy MG, Breitschwerdt EB. Development and evaluation of a seminested PCR for detection and differentiation of Babesia gibsoni (Asian genotype) and B. canis DNA in canine blood samples. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(9): 4172-4177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.9.4172-4177.2003 PMid:12958243.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.9.4172-4177.2003
• Cabezas-Cruz A, Passos LMF, Lis K, Kenneil R, Valdés JJ, Ferrolho J, et al. Fuente Functional and immunological relevance of Anaplasma marginale major surface protein 1α sequence and structural analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8(6): e65243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065243 PMid:23776456.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065243
• Carelli G, Decaro N, Lorusso A, Elia G, Lorusso E, Mari V, et al. Detection and quantification of Anaplasma marginale DNA in blood sample of cattle by real-time PCR. Vet Microbiol 2007; 124(1-2): 107-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.022 PMid:17466470.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.022
• De la Fuente J, Garcia-Garcia JC, Blouin EF, Rodríguez SD, Garcia MA, Kocan KM. Evolution and function of tandem repeats in the major surface protein 1α of the ehrlichial pathogen Anaplasma marginale. Anim Health Res Rev 2001; 2(2): 163-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/AHRR200132 PMid:11831437.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/AHRR200132
• De la Fuente J, Passos LMF, Van Den Bussche RA, Ribeiro MFB, Facury-Filho EJ, Kocan KM. Genetic diversity and molecular phylogeny of Anaplasma marginale isolates from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2004; 121(3-4): 307-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.021 PMid:15135871.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.021
• De la Fuente J, Van den Bussche RA, Garcia-Garcia JC, Rodríguez SD, García MA, Guglielmone A, et al. Phylogeography of New World isolates of Anaplasma marginale based on major surface protein sequences. Vet Microbiol 2002; 88(3): 275-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00122-0 PMid:12151201.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00122-0
• De la Fuente J, Van Den Bussche RA, Prado T, Kocan KM. Anaplasma marginale msp1α genotypes evolved under positive selection pressure but are not markers for geographic isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(4): 1609-1616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.4.1609-1616.2003 PMid:12682152.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.4.1609-1616.2003
• Estrada-Peña A, Naranjo V, Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Mangold AJ, Kocan KM, De la Fuente J. Phylogeographic analysis reveals association of tick-borne pathogen, Anaplasma marginale, MSP1a sequences with ecological traits affecting tick vector performance. BMC Biol 2009; 7(1): 57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-57 PMid:19723295.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-7-57
• Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred II: error probabilities. Genome Res 1998; 8(3): 186-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.186 PMid:9521922.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.8.3.186
• George N, Bhandari V, Sharma P. Phylogenetic relationship and genotypic variability in Anaplasma marginale strains causing anaplasmosis in India. Infect Genet Evol 2017; 48: 71-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.028 PMid:27939332.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.028
• Jaimes-Dueñez J, Triana-Chávez O, Mejía-Jaramillo AM. Spatial-temporal and phylogeographic characterization of Trypanosoma spp. in cattle (Bos taurus) and buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) reveals transmission dynamics of these parasites in Colombia. Vet Parasitol 2018; 249: 30-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.11.004 PMid:29279084.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.11.004
• Kocan KM, De la Fuente J, Guglielmone AA, Meléndez RD. Antigens and alternatives for control of Anaplasma marginale infection in cattle. Clin Microbiol Rev 2003; 16(4): 698-712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.4.698-712.2003 PMid:14557295.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.4.698-712.2003
• Kuramae-Izioka EE. A rapid, easy and high yield protocol for total genomic DNA isolation of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Fusarium oxysporum. Rev Unimar 1997; 19(3): 683-689.
• Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 2015; 6(9): 1110-1116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12410
• Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009; 25(11): 1451-1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 PMid:19346325.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
• Machado RZ, Silva JB, André MR, Gonçalves LR, Matos CA, Obregón D. Outbreak of anaplasmosis associated with the presence of different Anaplasma marginale strains in dairy cattle in the states of São Paulo and Goiás, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(4): 438-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015078 PMid:26648009.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015078
• Molad T, Fleidrovich L, Mazuz M, Fish L, Leibovitz B, Krigel Y, et al. Genetic diversity of major surface protein 1a of Anaplasma marginale in beef cattle. Vet Microbiol 2009; 136(1-2): 54-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.025 PMid:19081688.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.025
• Palmer GH, Rurangirwa FR, Kocan KM, Brown WC. Molecular basis for vaccine development against the ehrlichial pathogen Anaplasma marginale. Parasitol Today 1999; 15(7): 281-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01469-6 PMid:10377531.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01469-6
• Pohl AE, Cabezas-Cruz A, Ribeiro MFB, Silveira JAG, Silaghi C, Pfister K, et al. Detection of genetic diversity of Anaplasma marginale isolates in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2013; 22(1): 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013000100024 PMid:24252959.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013000100024
• Rodríguez-Vivas RI, Miller RJ, Ojeda-Chi MM, Rosado-Aguilar JA, Trinidad-Martínez IC, Pérez de León AA. Acaricide and ivermectin resistance in a field population of Rhipicephalus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) collected from red deer (Cervus elaphus) in the Mexican tropics. Vet Parasitol 2014; 200(1-2): 179-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.025 PMid:24365245.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.11.025
• Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA Sequencing with chain termination inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74(12): 5463-5467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 PMid:271968.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463
• Silva JB, André MR, Machado RZ. Low genetic diversity of Anaplasma marginale in calves in an endemic area for bovine anaplasmosis in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2016; 7(1): 20-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.07.018 PMid:26318264.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.07.018
• Silva JB, Gonçalves LR, Varani AM, André MR, Machado RZ. Genetic diversity and molecular phylogeny of Anaplasma marginale studied longitudinally under natural transmission conditions in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2015; 6(4): 499-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.04.002 PMid:25985719.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.04.002
• Souza Ramos IA, Herrera HM, Fernandes SJ, Amaral RB, Zanatto DCS, Silva TMV, et al. Genetic diversity of Anaplasma marginale in beef cattle in the Brazilian Pantanal. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 2019; 10(4): 805-814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.03.015 PMid:30930114.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.03.015
• Vidotto MC, Kano SF, Gregori F, Headley SA, Vidotto O. Phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma marginale strains from Paraná State, Brazil, using the msp1α and msp4 genes. J Vet Med 2006; 53(9): 404-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00984.x PMid:17062116.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00984.x

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  01 Aug 2019
• Date of issue
  Jul-Sep 2019

History

• Received
  27 Mar 2019
• Accepted
  16 May 2019