Open-access Transition from parents to caregivers of a child with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: a scoping review

Transición de padres a cuidadores de un niño con Diabetes Mellitus tipo 1: revisión de alcance

ABSTRACT

Objectives:  to map and summarize the existing scientific evidence on parents’ transition experience to exercise the caregiver role of a child with 1DM, identifying gaps in knowledge of this experience.

Methods:  a scoping review was carried out based on JBI methodology, in two databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Results:  we included 31 articles. From the studies, constitutive elements of parents’ transition experience to caregiver role of a child with 1DM were found, which focused on the nature of the experience, the feelings and emotions experienced, the hindering conditions, the facilitating conditions, the strategies used by parents and the results or effects obtained.

Final considerations:  the transition process’ characterizing elements were identified, but not a theoretical explanation of it. Additional research should be carried out in order to allow a deeper understanding of this process.

Descriptors: Diabetes Mellitus; Type 1; Parents; Parenting; Child Care; Review Literature as Topic

RESUMEN

Objetivos:  mapear y resumir la evidencia científica existente sobre la experiencia de transición de los padres para ejercer el rol de cuidador de un niño con DM1, identificando los vacíos existentes en el conocimiento de esta experiencia.

Métodos:  se realizó una revisión de alcance basada en la metodología JBI, en dos bases de datos, siguiendo la lista de verificación Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Resultados:  se incluyeron 31 artículos. A partir de los estudios se encontraron elementos constitutivos de la experiencia de transición de los padres al rol de cuidador de un niño con DM1, los cuales se centraron en la naturaleza de la experiencia, los sentimientos y emociones experimentados, las condiciones obstaculizadoras, las condiciones facilitadoras, las estrategias utilizados por los padres y los resultados o efectos obtenidos

Consideraciones finales:  se identificaron elementos caracterizadores del proceso de transición, pero no una explicación teórica del mismo. Se deben realizar investigaciones adicionales para permitir una comprensión más profunda de este proceso.

Descriptores: Diabetes Mellitus tipo 1; Padres; Responsabilidad Parental; Cuidado del Niño; Literatura de Revisión como Asunto

RESUMO

Objetivos:  mapear e resumir a evidência científica existente sobre a experiência de transição dos pais para o exercício do papel de cuidador de um filho com DM1, identificando lacunas existentes no conhecimento dessa experiência.

Métodos:  efetuada revisão scoping baseada na metodologia do JBI, em duas bases de dados, seguindo a checklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Resultados:  foram incluídos 31 artigos. A partir dos estudos, foram encontrados elementos constitutivos da experiência de transição dos pais para o papel de cuidador de um filho com DM1, que se centraram na natureza da experiência, nos sentimentos e emoções experimentadas, nas condições dificultadoras, nas condições facilitadoras, nas estratégias utilizadas pelos pais e nos resultados ou efeitos obtidos.

Considerações finais:  identificaram-se elementos caracterizadores do processo de transição, mas não uma explicação teórica do mesmo. Investigação adicional deverá ser realizada, a fim de permitir compreender aprofundadamente este processo.

Descritores: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1; Pais; Parentalidade; Cuidado da Criança; Revisão do Estado da Arte

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (1DM) is usually diagnosed during childhood or adolescence, becoming the most common chronic metabolic disease in pediatric age(1-2). The number of children and adolescents with diabetes increases every year, and in populations of European origin, almost all children and adolescents with diabetes have type 1. It is estimated that more than 98,200 children and adolescents under the age of 15 are diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus annually, and this number increases to 128,900 when the age group extends to 20 years(3).

In 1DM, due to children’s and some adolescents’ inability to take responsibility for the self-management of their chronic condition, this function falls on parents and, in particular, on mothers(4-7). It is socially expected that taking care of a child is carried out as an exercise inherent to the role of being a parent of any child, i.e., something intrinsic to the parental role. However, the exercise of this role acquires an additional responsibility, when children have a certain health condition that imposes functional limitations or when a long-term dependence is expected(8). Thus, becoming a caregiver for a child with a long-term chronic condition introduces an additional role, requiring a reorganization of priorities and a redirection of energy by caregivers(8). The experience of this complex situation has important and potentially negative consequences if health services and social support systems are unable to help these caregivers. Being a caregiver of a child with a chronic disease is connoted to a dynamic process, in which an individual goes through a sequence of steps, requiring considerable transitions and restructuring of responsibility over time(8).

In 1DM, we are faced with a situation of special complexity in which parents are required to additionally deal with the transition to the role of caregiver for a child with a chronic illness that requires a response that cannot be postponed and that is expected to be adaptive, promoting stability and well-being for all family members.

Chick & Meleis defined the concept of transition as the passage from one phase of life, condition or stable state to another, being a process triggered by a change(9-10). Transition, as a process and result, emerges from the complex network of interactions between person-environment, which may involve more than one person, and is integrated in a given context and situation, denoting a change in the health status or in the relationships of roles, expectations or skills(9-10). This concept is considered by Meleis as congruent or related to other concepts essential to this problem, such as those of adaptation, adjustment and self-care(11).

1DM diagnosis to a child is an impacting experience capable of altering parental and family dynamics, leading to the installation of an initial “chaos” that emerges from the vulnerability felt by parents regarding the health situation of their children, as well as the complexity of care that they have to take and the changes that this situation can trigger in their own processes and life expectations. Parents are presented with a unique set of challenges that constantly appeal to their ability to adapt, organize and care. Knowing how these parents’ transition to the role of caregiver is characterized is relevant for nursing care so that this can be a facilitating factor for a healthy transition.

OBJECTIVES

To map and summarize the existing scientific evidence on parents’ transition experience to exercise the caregiver role of a child with 1DM, identifying gaps in knowledge of this experience.

METHODS

Study design

The review was guided by the methodology proposed by the JBI for scoping reviews(12). The choice for this type of review was based on its recognized usefulness, when it is intended to map and summarize scientific evidence, allowing the analysis of how research on a particular phenomenon has been conducted, as well as identifying gaps in existing evidence, pointing to the need for additional research(13-14).

Methodological procedure

A previous systematic review protocol (unpublished) was elaborated, adopting the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR)(15). To develop this review, we followed the JBI Manual (version 2020)(12) recommendations, which includes the following steps: defining title, question and research objectives; defining inclusion criteria; defining strategy for research and selection of evidence sources, for data extraction, analysis and summary of evidence and for presentation of results.

Using the Participants, Concept and Context (PCC)(12) strategy, studies were included in the review in which participants (P) were parents (mothers and/or fathers) of children and adolescents diagnosed with 1DM, or another primary family caregiver of children. Studies in which children with 1DM were diagnosed with another chronic disease were excluded, in order not to lose the specificity of the topic of this review. Regarding the concept (C), studies that addressed parents’ transition experience to exercise the role of caregiver of a child with 1DM were included. As for the context (C), and considering the objective of this review, no specific one was identified. Based on this strategy, this review sought to answer the following question: what is parents’ transition experience to exercise the role of caregiver of a child with 1DM?

We included in the review all primary (qualitative, quantitative and mixed) and secondary (literature reviews of different types, including meta-analyses or meta-synthesis) studies that related to the review question and fulfilled the defined inclusion criteria. We also look for unpublished studies in the digital repositories of libraries of Portuguese higher education institutions, in the CAPES theses database (Brazil), in the Portugal Open Access Scientific Repository (RCAAP - Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal) and in the OpenGrey database.

Data source and search strategy

The defined search strategy intended to identify published and unpublished studies until February 2020, and the period for selecting articles took place from February to July 2020. The searches were conducted electronically and manually, the latter being carried out by searching for relevant articles in the bibliographic reference listings of selected articles. As recommended by JBI(12), the three-step research strategy was adopted. The first step involved carrying out an initial search carried out in CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO) and in MEDLINE Complete (via PubMed), using keywords and preliminary search expressions obtained from natural language: “Diabetes”, “Type 1 Diabetes”, “Child*”, “Infant”, “Pediatric”, “Adolescen*”, “Parents”, “Mother*”, “Father*”, Family caregiver*”, “Transition*”, “Parent* Experience”, “Adaptation”, “Coping” and “Parent* adjustment”. Then, we analyzed the words used in the titles and abstracts of obtained articles, in order to identify relevant additional terms, as well as indexing terms used by the selected databases (Subject Headings, in the case of CINAHL, and MeSH terms, in the case of MEDLINE), to describe the articles. The PCC elements, previously presented, were articulated to define the search terms and their combinations, and several tests were carried out in order to obtain research strategy refinement.

The second stage comprised a new search carried out, separately, in the CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO) and MEDLINE Complete (via PubMed) databases from the search terms in natural language and the indexing terms identified in the previous step, using the Boolean operators «OR» and «AND» (Chart 1).

Chart 1
Terms used in search strategy

Chart 2 presents an example of the research strategy used in the CINAHL Complete database (via EBSCO) (research carried out on July 18, 2020).

Chart 2
Search strategy used in the CINAHL Complete database (via EBSCO)

In the third step, the lists of bibliographic references of selected articles were analyzed, and other relevant studies were identified. The extracted material was imported and managed through the bibliographic reference management software Mendeley©, and the duplicate sources were eliminated. Each article’s title and abstract were read in full, and those that met the defined inclusion criteria were selected. Whenever doubts arose about the relevance of the study from the abstracts, the full article was retrieved. Study selection was performed by two reviewers. The cases in which there were doubts or divergences were resolved with the intervention of a third reviewer.

Data extraction

Data were extracted using the extraction instrument developed and agreed upon by the researchers, which included as items the identification of authors, year and country of origin, information about participants, methodology used and main results found. The data extraction process was carried out by two reviewers, and differences that arose were resolved through discussion between them, with no need to resort to a third reviewer.

Considering the objectives and the research question, it was decided to summarize the main results of included studies through descriptive qualitative content analysis(12,16). The results of this review are presented in Charts 3 and 4.

Chart 3
Identification, characterization and presentation of the main results of included studies
Chart 4
Characterization of parents’ transition experience to the role of caregiver of a child with Diabetes Mellitus 1

RESULTS

Through electronic search in databases, we identified 413 references in CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO), 449 in MEDLINE Complete (PubMed), 1 reference in the CAPES theses database (Brazil), 9 references in the RCAAP and 16 in the OpenGrey repository, totaling 888 records. Of these, 240 were excluded because they were duplicates, and 5 additional records were selected through reference lists of previously identified articles. Of the remaining 653 records, 511 were excluded after assessing title and abstract, and 3 were excluded because it was not possible to access their full text, even after efforts were made in this direction. After reading the full text of the 139 records, 108 were excluded because they did not meet the defined inclusion criteria, moving away from the topic under study (not focused on transition), because they integrated results common to parents and children (it was not possible to dissociate parents’ experience from that of children), or because they focused on marginal aspects of the transition experience under study.

Finally, a total of 31 studies were included in this review (Figure 1). Regarding the period of publication, it was found that it ranged between 1995 and 2018. Regarding the country where the studies were produced, it was found that there was a wide geographic distribution, with 83.8% (N= 26) were performed in North America and Europe. Regarding sample composition, it was recorded that 27 included fathers and mothers, while 3 included only mothers and 1 only fathers. The primary articles’ results were read in full, and those related to the initial question formulated and the objectives of this systematic review were extracted (Chart 3).

Figure 1
Study selection and inclusion process flowchart (PRISMA-ScR, 2018)

Parents’ transition was summarized in six categories: the nature of the experience; feelings and emotions experienced; hindering conditions or stressors; facilitating conditions; strategies used by parents; and results or effects obtained (intermediate or final) (Chart 4). The textual elements that characterize that experience are also presented.

DISCUSSION

From the results, it was possible to verify the existence of different studies that focused on parents’ experience in caring for children with 1DM. The nature of this experience implies a dynamic path that “occurs over time”(1,20,26-27,34,38,40-42), tending to adapt to the situation of children’s illness and to achieve “a new normalcy” in personal and family life.

Only two studies identified and named the phases during the care experience: the phase of diagnosis and hospitalization; caring for children at home (after hospital discharge, facing responsibility for managing a chronic illness); and long-term adaptation(45). In another study, it was possible to identify that the parental coping process was composed of different phases, such as disbelief, lack of information and guilt, learning to care, normalization, uncertainty and reorganization(43).

The results of the studies are unanimous in considering that 1DM diagnosis triggered strong emotional responses in the parents and feelings of a predominantly negative tone, such as sadness, shock, guilt, anguish, anxiety, anger, obsession, impotence and fear(1,18,20-21,23-29,31,34,37-38,40,45). However, at later times, some feelings of positive or mixed tint were also mentioned(27,31,38). 1DM diagnosis was experienced by parents as a mourning, associated with different losses of a healthy child, freedom, spontaneity and confidence in the exercise of parental role(1,4,20-21,27,31,34,38,40,45). The fear of the unknown, the disease therapeutic management and prognosis led parents to feel overwhelmed by the enormous responsibilities and unprepared to manage the disease’s complex therapeutic regimen.

Multiple concerns expressed by parents were identified, which were not limited only to the period of diagnosis, but that follow them throughout their lives, such as therapeutic regimen management(31,34), hypoglycemia/decompensation(25,40), hospitalization(45), children’s leaving home(39), threat to life(18,45), possibility of future complications(1,22,28,34,38-39) and those related to children’s future quality of life(1,18,20).

From the evidence found, it was possible to recognize that the experience of transition to the role of caregiver of a child with 1DM was marked by multiple hindering conditions or stressors that parents had to face. Difficulties were identified in understanding and assimilating the information transmitted in the hospital about the disease and its management (22,24,26), and, in some situations, this was considered insufficient(17,22). The feelings of uncertainty and anxiety were intensified when there was a transition from hospital care to self-manage the therapeutic regimen independently at home(23). Bringing children back home and facing the responsibility for managing a chronic disease was a stressor identified(23,45), as well as the difficulty in managing care, meeting their needs at home(17-18,21-23,25-27,31,34) and performing painful procedures(18,45), such as assessing capillary blood glucose and administering insulin. The risk of hypoglycemia(28,38-40), particularly those occurring at night(22,25,40), was another reported stressor. The unpredictability of blood glucose fluctuations and the difficulty in controlling them(45) also contributed to the insecurity felt by parents, not only in their own ability to keep their child safe(38), but also in the care provided by third parties(25,45) or at school(25).

The lack of support felt by parents was identified in some studies by society(20), by health professionals(21,34), by peers(22) and by daycare centers/schools(20,25,31). In other studies, the inadequate support provided by friends and family was reported as a difficulty(23), reinforcing the express need for greater support (including emotional support) by health professionals(22-23,26,34-35), by other parents of children/adolescents with 1DM(35) and by family members(18).

The evidence found also demonstrates that it was only possible for parents to deal with the disease and respond to the therapeutic regimen requirements through the presence of facilitating conditions, i.e., the availability of different sources of support, such as the health professionals responsible for child surveillance(17,22-23,25-28,33,36,40), the family(18,28,36), other parents with children with 1DM/support groups(22-23,30,32-33,40) and teachers and friends(36).

To face 1DM and manage the therapeutic regimen, parents resorted to different strategies, initially trying to deal with the disease, focusing on the practical aspects of 1DM management and prioritizing children’s immediate needs(27,36,39-40,45). Familiarizing themselves with the new situation was a challenge, as parents had to quickly learn about the disease and develop skills for the therapeutic regimen management(1,17-18,21,23,27-28,32,34,36-42,45). These skills included performing specific care in 1DM, such as assessing blood glucose, counting carbohydrates, dosing and administering insulin, and handling insulin pumps(25,27-28,36,38). The diagnosis of 1DM forced parents to make changes in family life and establish routines for children and family(1,4,25,38-40,42,45). Change in eating habits was one of the most evident(25,28,40). Intensely watching the child(20,22,28,31,36,41-42,45) and being permanently alert, physically and mentally ready(1,25), even at night(22,39), were other strategies used. In terms of employment, 1DM management implied that parents made work adaptations, which included making schedules more flexible(23), reducing the time of work activity(19,39), being absent from work(25), changing jobs(17) or home officing(20), all with the aim of gaining greater flexibility and ensuring greater presence in child support.

As they experienced insecurity regarding the care provided to their children during the school period(25), parents took the responsibility of ensuring the training of school staff (1,44), engaging in multiple educational and child advocacy initiatives(20,30-31,44). Always striving to affirm children as “normal”, with a particular characteristic (having 1DM)(30,37), parents sought the support of health professionals(26,36,39,42,45), teachers, friends and family(18,36,40), as well as other parents of children with 1DM(18,32).

Results or consequences observed by parents during the performance of their role as caregivers of children with 1DM were identified in the literature, results that vary and even evolve according to the transition process dynamism. As a consequence, studies highlighted the negative impact on social life(23,28) and conflicted relationships between parents, intimacy wise(20), as well as the existence of conflicts due to disagreement about the way of caring for the child(36), or conflicts with adolescents with 1DM(35). However, in another study, it was found as a result the greater closeness and affection of husbands after diagnosis(36). The effort and attention dedicated to 1DM management also affected the parents’ relationship with other children as a result of jealousy and anger felt, due to the fact that parents spend more time and devote more attention to children with 1DM(20,28-29).

Parents became aware of the permanent change in their lives(1,4,17), starting to consider diabetes as part of their daily life. Having a child with diabetes and incorporating their needs into their lifestyle and family became the new normalcy(20,34,38,40,45). Parents, although feeling exhausted(1,20,22,45) and tired due to constant vigilance and sleep deprivation(20,25), were learning to master the 1DM therapeutic regimen demands, to better understand the disease symptoms and how to regulate their children’s blood glucose levels, going from novices to experts, feeling in control of the disease most of the time(27). However, acceptance of the disease, despite having been achieved in some cases (21,27,34,36), in others, it was never verified(29). Many parents sought to achieve a balance between “perfect” control and living as normally as possible(20). Even in a phase of greater adaptation, in which parents felt more prepared to deal with/manage the disease(41), more competent, confident, flexible(27,42) and safer in providing care(23), they continued to recognize the need for strategic coping to take control, build support systems and learn to trust others(20,45).

Study limitations

As a limitation, it is pointed out that it was not possible to have access to the full text of three identified articles. In addition to this, the fact that 83.8% of selected studies were carried out in North America and Northern Europe could constitute a limitation of this study, given the disparity and weight of each country’s unique cultural aspects as well as the responses provided/existing by social systems and health services that will certainly influence the way the transition process under study is experienced by parents.

Contributions to nursing

Mapping and summary the existing scientific evidence allowed the characterization of parents’ experience of transition to the role of caregiver of children with 1DM. Although this summary, by its nature, does not allow to extract implications for practice, it leaves indications for professionals (nurses), either about the arduous and transforming experience that 1DM in children implies for parents, or about the need for timely training and persistent care.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

This review allowed us to identify and summarize elements that characterize parents’ transition experience to exercise the role of caregiver of children with 1DM. Despite the fact that the constitutive elements of this experience are globally characterized in the literature and the predominance of qualitative studies included in this review, theorization that makes it possible to understand the process of transition of parents to the exercise of the role of caregiver needs specific investigation. Therefore, further studies need to be carried out in order to theorize this transition process, enabling a thorough understanding of it.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Iversen AS, Graue M, Haugstvedt A, Råheim M. Being mothers and fathers of a child with type 1 diabetes aged 1 to 7 years: a phenomenological study of parents’ experiences. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018;13(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1487758
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1487758
  • 2 Streisand R, Monaghan M. Young children with type 1 diabetes: Challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0520-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-014-0520-2
  • 3 International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 9th ed. [Internet]. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation; 2019 [cited 2021 Dec 3]. 176 p. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/resources/
    » https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/resources/
  • 4 Rifshana F, Breheny M, Taylor JE, Ross K. The Parental Experience of Caring for a Child with Type 1 Diabetes. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26(11):3226-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0806-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0806-5
  • 5 Johnson N, Melton ST. Parent perspectives on life with a child with type 1 diabetes. J Ethnogr Qual Res [Internet]. 2014[cited 2020 Feb 3];9(2):112-20. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1r-iKXTqJCyAObx7igNThjh1RP1_HLy4s/view
    » https://drive.google.com/file/d/1r-iKXTqJCyAObx7igNThjh1RP1_HLy4s/view
  • 6 Santos S. A família da criança com doença crónica: Abordagem de algumas características. Anál Psicol [Internet]. 1998[cited 2020 Feb 3];1(XVI):65-75. Available from: http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/aps/v16n1/v16n1a07.pdf
    » http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/aps/v16n1/v16n1a07.pdf
  • 7 Sparud-Lundin C, Hallström I, Erlandsson L. Challenges, Strategies, and Gender Relations Among Parents of Children Recently Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes. J Fam Nurs. 2013;19(2):249-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840713484386
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840713484386
  • 8 Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter S, Russel D, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626-36. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1689
    » https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1689
  • 9 Schumacher KL, Meleis A lbrahim. Transitions: a central concept in nursing. Image J Nurs Scholarsh. 1994;26(2):119-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00929.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1994.tb00929.x
  • 10 Meleis A. Theoretical Nursing: development & progress. 5th Ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012. 672 p.
  • 11 Meleis A, Sawyer L, Im E, Messias D, Schumacher K. Experiencing Transitions: an emerging middle-range theory. Adv Nurs Sci. 2000;23(1):12-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200009000-00006
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200009000-00006
  • 12 Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco A, Khalil H. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual [Internet]. Adelaide. South Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020[cited 2020 Feb 3]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
    » https://synthesismanual.jbi.global
  • 13 Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
  • 14 Lockwood C, Tricco AC. Preparing scoping reviews for publication using methodological guides and reporting standards. Nurs Health Sci. 2020;22(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12673
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12673
  • 15 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
    » https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
  • 16 Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616
  • 17 Holmström MR, Häggström M, Söderberg S. Experiences from Parents to Children with Diabetes Type 1. JSM Heal Educ Prim Heal Care 3 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 30];3(2):1044. Available from: http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1270689/FULLTEXT01.pdf
    » http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1270689/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  • 18 Khandan M, Abazari F, Tirgari B, Cheraghi MA. Lived experiences of mothers with diabetic children from the transfer of caring role. Int J community based Nurs midwifery [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 20];6(1):76-88. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29344538
    » https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29344538
  • 19 Herbert LJ, Wall K, Monaghan M, Streisand R. Parent employment and school/daycare decisions among parents of young children with type 1 diabetes. Child Health Care. 2017;46(2):170-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2015.1124776
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/02739615.2015.1124776
  • 20 Pierce JS, Aroian K, Caldwell C, Ross JL, Lee JM, Schifano E, et al. The ups and downs of parenting young children with type 1 diabetes: a crowdsourcing study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2017;42(8):846-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx056
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx056
  • 21 Pimentel R, Targa T, Scardoelli M. From diagnosis to the unknown: perceptions of parents of children and adolescents with diabetes mellitus. Rev Enferm UFPE. 2017;11(3):1118-26. https://doi.org/10.5205/reuol.10544-93905-1-RV.1103201701
    » https://doi.org/10.5205/reuol.10544-93905-1-RV.1103201701
  • 22 Rankin D, Harden J, Waugh N, Noyes K, Barnard KD, Lawton J. Parents’ information and support needs when their child is diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. Health Expect. 2016;19(3):580-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12244
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12244
  • 23 Boogerd EA, Maas-van Schaaijk NM, Noordam C, Marks HJG, Verhaak CM. Parents’ experiences, needs, and preferences in pediatric diabetes care: suggestions for improvement of care and the possible role of the Internet. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2015;20(3):218-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12118
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12118
  • 24 Lawton J, Waugh N, Noyes K, Barnard K, Harden J, Bath L, et al. Improving communication and recall of information in paediatric diabetes consultations: a qualitative study of parents’ experiences and views. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0388-6
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-015-0388-6
  • 25 Rodrigues C. Dificuldades sentidas pelos pais de crianças com Diabetes Mellitus em idade pré-escolar na gestão da terapêutica e alimentação [Internet]. Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra; 2015. [cited 2020 Jan 30]. 126 p. Available from: http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/private/index.php?process=download&id=35084&code=274
    » http://repositorio.esenfc.pt/private/index.php?process=download&id=35084&code=274
  • 26 Ayala J, Howe C, Dumser S, Buzby M, Murphy K. Partnerships with providers: reflections from parents of children with type 1 diabetes. West J Nurs Res. 2014;36(9):1238-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945913518848
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945913518848
  • 27 Forsner M, Berggren J, Masaba J, Ekbladh A, Olinder AL. Parents’ experiences of caring for a child younger than two years of age treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Eur Diabetes Nurs. 2014;11(1):7-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.239
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.239
  • 28 Silva M. A vivência dos pais em relação à criança/adolescente com diabetes mellitus tipo 1 [Internet]. Instituto Politécnico de Viseu; 2014[cited 2020 Jan 31]. 127 p. available from: https://repositorio.ipv.pt/handle/10400.19/2538
    » https://repositorio.ipv.pt/handle/10400.19/2538
  • 29 Martins E, Ataíde M, Silva D, Frota M. Experience of mothers in the care of children with type 1 diabetes. Rev Rene[Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 20];14(1):42-9. Available from: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/3323/2561
    » http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/3323/2561
  • 30 Nurmi MA, Stieber-Roger K. Parenting children living with type 1 diabetes: a qualitative study. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(4):530-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721712446636
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721712446636
  • 31 Dashiff C, Riley BH, Abdullatif H, Moreland E. Parents’ experiences supporting self-management of middle adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Nurs [Internet]. 2011[cited 2020 Feb 20];37(6):304-10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22256691/
    » https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22256691/
  • 32 Rearick EM, Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Knafl KA. Parents of children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes: experiences with social support and family management. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37(4):508-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721711412979
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721711412979
  • 33 Smaldone A, Ritholz MD. Perceptions of parenting children with type 1 diabetes diagnosed in early childhood. J Pediatr Health Care. 2011;25(2):87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.09.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.09.003
  • 34 Bowes S, Lowes L, Warner J, Gregory JW. Chronic sorrow in parents of children with type 1 diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(5):992-1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04963.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04963.x
  • 35 Paterson B, Brewer J. Needs for social support among parents of adolescents with diabetes. J Nurs Healthc Chronic Illn. 2009;1(2):177-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-9824.2009.01019.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-9824.2009.01019.x
  • 36 Athaseri S, Tilokskulchai F, Patoomwan A, Grey M, Knafl K, Suprasongsin C. Understanding mothers of children with type 1 diabetes: an investigation of perspective and management. Thai J Nurs Res [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2021 Dec 3];25;12(1):55-69. Available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/5896
    » https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/PRIJNR/article/view/5896
  • 37 Sullivan-Bolyai S, Rosenberg R, Bayard M. Fathers’ reflections on parenting young children with type 1 diabetes. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2006;31(1):24-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200601000-00007
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200601000-00007
  • 38 Lowes L, Gregory JW, Lyne P. Newly diagnosed childhood diabetes: a psychosocial transition for parents? J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(3):253-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03388.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03388.x
  • 39 Mellin AE, Neumark-Sztainer D, Patterson JM. Parenting adolescent girls with type 1 diabetes: parents’ perspectives. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29(3):221-30. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsh023
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsh023
  • 40 Lowes L, Lyne P, Gregory JW. Childhood diabetes: parents’ experience of home management and the first year following diagnosis. Diabet Med. 2004;21(6):531-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01193.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01193.x
  • 41 Sullivan-Bolyai S, Deatrick J, Gruppuso P, Tamborlane W, Grey M. Constant vigilance: mothers’ work parenting young children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2003;18(1):21-9. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpdn.2003.4
    » https://doi.org/10.1053/jpdn.2003.4
  • 42 Sullivan-Bolyai S, Knafl K, Deatrick J, Grey M. Maternal management behaviors for young children with type 1 diabetes. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2003;28(3):160-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200305000-00005
    » https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200305000-00005
  • 43 Seppänen SM, Kyngäs HA, Nikkonen MJ. Coping and social support of parents with a diabetic child. Nurs Health Sci. 1999;1(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00009.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2018.1999.00009.x
  • 44 Faulkner MS. Family responses to children with diabetes and their influence on self-care. J Pediatr Nurs. 1996;11(2):82-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-5963(96)80065-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-5963(96)80065-0
  • 45 Hatton DL, Canam C, Thorne S, Hughes AM. Parents’ perceptions of caring for an infant or toddler with diabetes. J Adv Nurs. 1995 Sep;22(3):569-77. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030569.x
    » https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22030569.x

Edited by

  • EDITOR IN CHIEF: Antonio José de Almeida Filho
  • ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Fátima Helena do Espírito Santo

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    30 Jan 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    22 Apr 2022
  • Accepted
    09 Nov 2022
location_on
Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem SGA Norte Quadra 603 Conj. "B" - Av. L2 Norte 70830-102 Brasília, DF, Brasil, Tel.: (55 61) 3226-0653, Fax: (55 61) 3225-4473 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
E-mail: reben@abennacional.org.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro