Microwave-Assisted Acid Digestion: Evaluation of Reaction Vessel Design and Performance

Abstract

Nowadays, microwave-assisted procedures using closed vessels with thermal, chemical, and mechanical resistance are the state-of-the-art for efficient digestion of samples. Safety issues related to sample reactivity should be considered and analytical throughput is also a critical parameter. The choice of a specific vessel for a target application is not trivial and simple experiments are presented here for rice flour and bovine liver samples to illustrate effects of vessel design on digestion performance. Despite using the same heating program, the residual carbon contents varied from 22 to 67% to bovine liver digests and from 7 to 96% to rice flour digests. Quantitative recoveries were obtained for most analytes. Low recoveries were observed mainly for Ca and Fe. Analytical performance is related to different sizes, shapes and the gradient of temperature for each model of digestion vessel. It was demonstrated that taller vessels improved regeneration of nitric acid.

Keywords:
microwave radiation; sample preparation; closed vessel; digestion efficiency; ICP OES

Introduction

Kingston and Jassie¹ and Kingston and Haswell² have published landmark books that demonstrated the benefits of microwave radiation for sample digestion and for enhancing chemical processes in several areas of science. More recently, Krug and Rocha³ and Flores⁴ have edited books that demonstrated how this technology has evolved and nowadays it is broadly applied. In this context, microwave-assisted digestion has progressively become a standard procedure for sample preparation and it has clear impact in procedures applied for trace analysis and green chemistry.⁵

As typical in analytical chemistry, there is a feedback process between the evolution of instrumentation and the understanding of thermochemical processes allowing the development of sample digestion procedures compatible with modern analytical instruments for simultaneous determination of several analytes. Gradually, it became clear that microwave radiation is not only an alternative for fast heating of solutions containing ions and dipoles, but it is a strategy for implementing better and more effective analytical procedures. The use of dilute nitric acid solutions for performing digestions represents a step forward in the arsenal of strategies combining trace analysis and green chemistry requirements.⁵

This evolution relied on the design of proper microwave ovens with temperature and pressure sensors, hardware and software that supported the development of reliable, safe, and efficient analytical procedures for sample digestion. Another critical development was the design of proper reaction vessels that can withstand high pressure, high temperature and critical chemical reagents. Of course, this evolution had occurred step by step and new materials and designs were carefully evaluated.^1-4 Nowadays, we have available vessels and rotors that can accommodate these critical working conditions.

In this sense, one important feature is how to choose a reaction vessel for performing digestions. One clear aspect is the relation between the maximum mass of sample and the maximum pressure a vessel can withstand. Generally, it is assumed that typical maximum masses for organic samples are around 0.5 g and for inorganic samples are around 1 g because the former generate higher volume of gases. Another critical parameter is the maximum temperature that can be applied that is related to the efficiency of digestion and vessel material. Another important point, despite being less considered, is the dimensions of the vessels. Volume is important, but two vessels may have the same volume and they will have different performances if their diameters and heights are different. Taller vessels have higher gradient of temperature among solution phase, gas phase and vessel walls. This will improve the regeneration of nitric acid by condensation processes.⁶ The use of hydrogen peroxide in the acid mixture for promoting sample digestion releases oxygen and energy to the system providing a more efficient digestion. When dilute nitric acid solution promotes the oxidation of the organic matrix of the sample, NO is formed and this compound is easily oxidized to NO₂. Further processes led to regeneration of nitric acid as shown in equations below:

(1) $2H_2{O}_2\to 2H_{2}O+O_{2\left(g\right)}$

(2) ${\left({\mathrm{CH}}_2\right)}_n+2{\mathrm{HNO}}_{3\left(\mathrm{aq}\right)}\to {\mathrm{CO}}_{2(g)}+2{\mathrm{NO}}_{\left(g\right)}+2H_2{O}_{(1)}$

(3) $2{\mathrm{NO}}_{(g)}+O_{2(g)\to }2{\mathrm{NO}}_{2(g)}$

(4) $2{\mathrm{NO}}_{2(g)}+H_2{O}_{(1)}\to {\mathrm{HNO}}_{3(\mathrm{aq})}+{\mathrm{HNO}}_{2(\mathrm{aq})}$

These processes were demonstrated for microwave-assisted⁶ and also for conventional heating.⁷

This study evaluated three vessel designs for digestions of rice flour and bovine liver samples using dilute nitric acid solutions. Two types of vessels were designed for conventional microwave ovens and one type of vessel was designed for the single reaction chamber technology (SRC). This is a different type of microwave oven with all vessels inserted in a nitrogen pressurized 1 L chamber containing a small volume of water-acid base load that absorbs microwave radiation and transfers the heat to the partially immersed reaction vessels. The SRC technology was discussed in detail in a recent book.⁸

Experimental

Instruments

Two microwave ovens produced by Milestone (Milestone, Sorisole, BG, Italy) were used in this study. The first is the model ETHOS UP^TM associated with either a medium pressure rotor with 44 TFM vessels (MAXI 44) or with a high-pressure rotor featuring up to 15 TFM vessels (SK-15). Figure 1 shows a picture of these vessels. The former allows maximum temperature of 200 °C and the pressure must be kept below 35 bar. On the other hand, the latter can support temperatures of up to 230 °C and maximum working pressure of 100 bar. This oven has 1.8 kW microwave power source. These vessels have a volume of 100 mL and these rotors were controlled by contact-less infrared sensor (T2) for temperature control of all vessels.

Figure 1
Digestion vessels: (a) MAXI 44, (b) SK-15 and (c) SRC.

The second microwave oven used is the UltraWAVE^TM that is based on the SRC technology which overcomes limitations of all conventional microwave ovens. The UltraWAVE^TM has a 1.5 kW microwave power source that delivers microwave energy to a 1 L chamber that usually contains 150 mL of deionized water plus 5 mL of concentrated HNO₃. The racks with TFM, quartz or glass vessels stay inside this SRC. Direct pressure and temperature control of the SRC allows direct control of each sample. The UltraWAVE^TM can be operated up to 199 bar of pressure and at temperatures as high as 300 °C. Digestions were carried out using a rack with 15 TFM vessels. Each vessel has a volume of 15 mL.

The determination of selected analytes was performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES iCAP 6000 Duo, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) in axial viewing mode. Instrument operational conditions are shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Operational conditions for inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry

Instrument parameter	Operational condition
Radiofrequency applied power / kW	1.15
Plasma gas flow rate / (L min-1)	12
Auxiliary gas flow rate / (L min-1)	1.5
Nebulizer gas flow rate / (L min-1)	0.50
Sample flow rate / (mL min-1)	1.0
Stabilization time / s	5
Observation mode	axial
Spectral line / nm	CI 193.091; Ca I 422.673 Ca II 317.933; Cu I 324.754 Fe II 238.204; K I 766.490 K I 404.414; Mg II 280.270 Mn II 259.373; Na I 588.995 Na I 818.326; P I 177.495 Zn II 202.548

The total carbon in bovine liver and rice flour samples was determined by element analyzer CHNS-O (EA 1108, Fisons Instruments, Cornaredo, MI, Italy) and the dissolved organic carbon after digestion was determined by ICP OES.

¹H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired in a Bruker (Karlsruhe, Germany) equipment, AVANCE III model, 14.1 T (600.23 MHz for the ¹H frequency) equipped with a 5 mm TXI cryogenic probe and keeping the temperature at 298 K during all measurements. The spectra were collected using a pulse sequence with water signal suppression performed by an excitation sculpting sequence, with 128 scans (NS), 4 dummy scans (DS), 64 K data points (TD), spectral window of 16 ppm (SW), acquisition time (AQ) of 3.40 s, relaxation delay 3.0 s (D1) and the receiver gain (RG) used was the same for all the experiments. All spectra were referenced to the sodium 3-trimethylsilyl-2,2,3,3-propianate-d₄ (TMSP-d₄, δ = 0.00 ppm) and processed with 32 K points (SI), using an exponential multiplication (lb = 0.3 Hz) and automatic phase and baseline correction.

Materials, samples and solutions

Distilled-deionized water was produced in a Milli-Q^® System (Bedford, MA, USA) and used to prepare all solutions. Nitric acid (Labsynth, Diadema, SP, Brazil) was purified using the DuoPur apparatus (Milestone, Sorisole, Italy). Concentrated nitric acid purified by sub-boiling distillation was diluted to 3.0, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.35 mol L^-1. These diluted solutions were used for sample digestions. Concentrated H₂O₂ (30% m m^-1) from Labsynth, Diadema, SP, Brazil, was also used. Reference analytical solutions were prepared in 1% v v^-1 HNO₃ by dilution of stock solutions containing 1000 mg L^-1 of each target analyte (Qhemis, São Paulo, SP, Brazil and SpecSol, Jacareí, SP, Brazil). All materials and glassware were immersed in 10% v v^-1 HNO₃ for 24 h and rinsed with deionized water before use.

This study was performed using two reference materials: rice flour (CRM-Agro C1001a) and bovine liver (RM-AgroE3001a). The first was produced by the Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura-Universidade de São Paulo (CENA-USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) and the second by EMBRAPA Pecuária Sudeste (São Carlos, SP, Brazil) as part of an inter laboratory program. All digests were diluted to 50 mL before determination of analytes.

Procedure

Masses of approximately 500 mg of samples were accurately weighed and transferred to 15-mL TFM vessels and 10.0 mL of HNO₃ solutions (3.0, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.35 mol L^-1) or 8.0 mL of HNO₃ solutions (3.0, 1.4, 0.7 and 0.35 mol L^-1) plus 2.0 mL of H₂O₂ (30% m m^-1) were added for performing digestions. Analytical blanks of different digest solutions were simultaneously prepared.

The heating program adopted in all experiments is described in Table 2. Table 3 describes the second heating program applied only in some experiments using UltraWAVE^TM.

Table 2
Heating program adopted in all experiments when evaluating the three different vessel configurations at maximum temperature of 200 ºC

Temperature / ºC	time of ramp / min	time of plateau / min
100	5	5
200	5	15

Table 3
Heating program adopted in UltraWAVE^TM at higher temperature

Temperature / ºC	time of ramp / min	time of plateau / min
150	10	2
240	15	10

The residual acidity was determined by acid-base titrations of the digests. Titrations were carried out with NaOH standardized solution (0.0463 mol L^-1) and phenolphthalein as indicator. Dissolved organic carbon contents (DOC) were determined by ICP OES using solutions containing oxalic acid (Mallinckrodt, Phillipsburg, NJ, USA) for calibration. The total organic carbon (TOC) was determined using analytical curve of the acetanilide (CH₃CONHC₆H₅). The residual carbon content (RCC) was calculated as indicated in literature.⁴

The adopted sample preparation for NMR measurements was the simple addition of 100 µL of deuterium oxide solution with TMSP-d₄ (0.2% v v^-1) as internal standard to 400 µL of the sample resulted from the different digestion processes. After homogenization using a vortex type stirrer for 10 min the final solution was transferred to a 5 mm NMR tube.

Results and Discussion

This section was structured to describe the analytical performance of each rotor and respective vessels starting from the simplest one, MAXI 44, followed by SK-15 vessels, and, finally, for the SRC technology.

Analytical performance: MAXI 44

The digests of bovine liver and rice flour samples obtained using the MAXI 44 rotor with addition of H₂O₂ had better visual aspects for all tested concentrations of HNO₃ in comparison to the digests without this reagent (Figure 2). Recoveries were quantitative for most elements in all conditions, except for Ca in bovine liver digests and Fe in rice flour digests (Tables 4 and 5). It was demonstrated by Wieteska et al.⁹ that the presence of Si in vegetable samples affected the extraction of Fe in vegetable samples when HF was not used. Sucharová and Suchara¹⁰ have shown that Si affects recoveries of several elements in plant materials, e.g., Cu, Fe, Ni, Zn, etc., depending on its concentration.

Figure 2
Digests obtained using MAXI 44 vessels and different nitric acid concentrations at 200 °C. (a) Bovine liver digests without H₂O₂; (b) bovine liver digests with H₂O₂; (c) rice flour digests without H₂O₂; (d) rice flour digests with H₂O₂.

Table 4
Recoveries of some elements in digests of bovine liver samples obtained using different vessels and concentrations of HNO₃ with or without H₂O₂ at 200 and 240 ºC

Rotor	Temperature / ºC	Medium	Recovery / %
			Ca	Cu	Fe	K	Mg	Na	P	Zn
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1	98 ± 3	104 ± 2	81 ± 1	99 ± 1	85 ± 1	74 ± 0	74 ± 0	85 ± 2
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1	71 ± 6	105 ± 1	84 ± 1	107 ± 1	87 ± 1	78 ± 1	79 ± 1	88 ± 3
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1	106 ± 21	104 ± 0	84 ± 0	109 ± 1	88 ± 1	80 ± 0	81 ± 0	93 ± 1
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1	61 ± 2	60 ± 7	76 ± 2	106 ± 1	87 ± 0	79 ± 0	82 ± 1	92 ± 5
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	92 ± 9	104 ± 0	80 ± 0	95 ± 0	83 ± 1	76 ± 0	78 ± 1	79 ± 1
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	82 ± 1	102 ± 0	81 ± 0	97 ± 0	85 ± 0	77 ± 0	81 ± 1	85 ± 1
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	76 ± 6	104 ± 3	80 ± 2	103 ± 3	86 ± 2	80 ± 2	85 ± 1	89 ± 2
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	87 ± 1	97 ± 0	78 ± 1	102 ± 1	85 ± 0	79 ± 0	84 ± 0	86 ± 1
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1	99 ± 18	112 ± 3	101 ± 4	84 ± 1	94 ± 0	86 ± 1	75 ± 1	105 ± 6
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1	89 ± 2	107 ± 1	85 ± 15	84 ± 0	95 ± 0	86 ± 0	77 ± 0	86 ± 2
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1	97 ± 4	87 ± 5	7 ± 3	87 ± 3	95 ± 1	86 ± 2	79 ± 2	110 ± 0
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	106 ± 4	113 ± 1	100 ± 2	90 ± 2	95 ± 0	90 ± 1	81 ± 0	117 ± 1
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	73 ± 5	108 ± 4	100 ± 1	90 ± 4	96 ± 1	83 ± 3	81 ± 1	117 ± 0
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	85 ± 1	95 ± 3	4 ± 4	81 ± 3	93 ± 1	77 ± 2	78 ± 0	117 ± 2
SK-15		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	80 ± 1	67 ± 2	44 ± 7	82 ± 5	92 ± 0	77 ± 6	79 ± 2	108 ± 4
SRC	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	85 ± 5	102 ± 0	83 ± 0	92 ± 0	85 ± 1	77 ± 0	84 ± 1	90 ± 1
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	98 ± 3	101 ± 2	4 ± 0	95 ± 2	88 ± 1	79 ± 1	92 ± 1	97 ± 1
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	75 ± 8	81 ± 5	8 ± 3	98 ± 2	89 ± 1	80 ± 2	94 ± 2	96 ± 1
SRC		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	74 ± 4	36 ± 3	26 ± 3	101 ± 1	90 ± 1	80 ± 1	95 ± 1	83 ± 1
SRC	240	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	87 ± 1	87 ± 1	90 ± 0	101 ± 1	92 ± 2	80 ± 1	95 ± 1	87 ± 1
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	100 ± 2	95 ± 0	3 ± 2	81 ± 2	98 ± 0	83 ± 0	76 ± 1	98 ± 0
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	80 ± 2	65 ± 8	ND	91 ± 2	96 ± 4	80 ± 3	76 ± 2	96 ± 3

• SRC: single reaction chamber; ND: not determined.

Table 5
Recoveries of some elements in digests of rice flour samples obtained using different vessels and concentrations of HNO₃ with or without H₂O₂ at 200 and 240 ºC

Rotor	Temperature / ºC	Medium	Recovery / %
			Ca	Cu	Fe	K	Mg	Mn	Na	P	Zn
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1	94 ± 1	93 ± 17	65 ± 4	80 ± 1	98 ± 2	110 ± 2	88 ± 0	90 ± 1	96 ± 4
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1	86 ± 0	74 ± 2	80 ± 19	83 ± 3	91 ± 7	108 ± 1	87 ± 0	94 ± 0	84 ± 0
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1	74 ± 8	88 ± 2	81 ± 26	87 ± 1	92 ± 2	109 ± 1	88 ± 1	97 ± 1	93 ± 6
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1	91 ± 5	55 ± 37	42 ± 8	84 ± 2	102 ± 1	109 ± 2	93 ± 45	97 ± 0	99 ± 6
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	107 ± 4	84 ± 1	73 ± 15	84 ± 3	86 ± 5	108 ± 1	108 ± 1	101 ± 1	96 ± 3
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	103 ± 4	92 ± 3	67 ± 2	83 ± 3	96 ± 4	109 ± 4	95 ± 2	103 ± 3	104 ± 7
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	102 ± 2	91 ± 2	67 ± 3	89 ± 2	95 ± 3	110 ± 4	105 ± 7	106 ± 4	95 ± 2
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	99 ± 1	72 ± 0	48 ± 3	89 ± 2	92 ± 2	108 ± 3	102 ± 6	109 ± 3	93 ± 2
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1	98 ± 2	83 ± 3	80 ± 43	88 ± 4	94 ± 2	113 ± 1	84 ± 5	95 ± 3	102 ± 8
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1	112 ± 17	83 ± 3	78 ± 13	86 ± 2	96 ± 4	112 ± 1	85 ± 7	94 ± 0	95 ± 0
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1	109 ± 13	78 ± 3	65 ± 7	90 ± 2	97 ± 3	115 ± 2	84 ± 2	97 ± 0	103 ± 4
SK-15		0.35 mol L-1	110 ± 11	16 ± 4	­ND	87 ± 2	97 ± 4	112 ± 2	93 ± 1	96 ± 2	84 ± 3
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	106 ± 19	86 ± 1	63 ± 1	86 ± 1	98 ± 2	112 ± 1	106 ± 4	96 ± 1	87 ± 6
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	109 ± 5	81 ± 0	63 ± 1	87 ± 1	91 ± 1	107 ± 1	106 ± 2	96 ± 1	106 ± 3
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	109 ± 3	85 ± 1	61 ± 3	91 ± 2	98 ± 0	113 ± 1	103 ± 0	100 ± 1	101 ± 1
SK-15		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	105 ± 11	44 ± 1	42 ± 2	90 ± 1	96 ± 0	112 ± 1	99 ± 0	101 ± 1	72 ± 0
SRC	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	76 ± 2	63 ± 0	52 ± 1	70 ± 0	75 ± 1	89 ± 0	61 ± 1	80 ± 1	79 ± 2
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	73 ± 1	68 ± 2	50 ± 1	72 ± 3	82 ± 2	90 ± 3	55 ± 3	81 ± 2	79 ± 0
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	75 ± 5	38 ± 10	ND	76 ± 4	80 ± 2	93 ± 5	65 ± 8	88 ± 6	81 ± 3
SRC		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	87 ± 15	5 ± 7	ND	82 ± 8	84 ± 8	98 ± 7	85 ± 21	94 ± 7	88 ± 5
SRC	240	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	110 ± 10	107 ± 9	84 ± 5	82 ± 4	95 ± 5	75 ± 3	94 ± 18	124 ± 10	117 ± 9
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	115 ± 27	91 ± 3	63 ± 4	83 ± 3	85 ± 1	116 ± 3	67 ± 7	109 ± 4	113 ± 14
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	106 ± 2	56 ± 2	13 ± 1	84 ± 4	85 ± 1	116 ± 2	65 ± 3	112 ± 2	110 ± 2

• SRC: single reaction chamber; ND: not determined.

The validation and quality assurance of recoveries can be confirmed using reference materials and the range of acceptance values (80 to 110%). According to Tavernieset al.¹¹ certified reference materials are useful tools to achieve traceability in analytical measurements, calibrate equipment and methods, monitor laboratory performance, allowing to compare methods and their validations and quality assurance. Considering this validation factor and the recoveries obtained from 80 to 110%, it can be concluded that these data are valid.

Residual carbon contents were in the range of 33 to 96% for all bovine liver and rice flour digests for all tested concentrations of HNO₃, heating program and H₂O₂ addition (Table 6). However, these values were not determined when digests contained appreciable amounts of solid residues, clearly indicating an inefficient digestion as observed when using 0.35 mol L^-1 HNO₃. For both samples, RCC values were around 33 to 52% when using H₂O₂. RCC varied from 53 to 96% without using H₂O₂. This large difference is related to the action of H₂O₂ as auxiliary reagent, incrementing the nitric acid regeneration and, consequently, facilitating the digestion process.¹²

Table 6
Residual acidity and residual carbon content (RCC) of digests of rice flour and bovine liver samples obtained using different vessels and temperatures of 200 and 240 ºC

Rotor	Temperature / ºC	Medium	Residual acidity / %			RCC / %
			Rice flour	Bovine liver		Rice flour	Bovine liver
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1	95	92		86 ± 4	53 ± 5
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1	107	75		96 ± 1	67 ± 5
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1	100	71		93 ± 4	67 ± 1
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1	57	71		84 ± 1	b
MAXI 44	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	92	100		33 ± 1	42 ± 1
MAXI 44		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	123	82		52 ± 26	45 ± 1
MAXI 44		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	82	82		40 ± 3	50 ± 1
MAXI 44		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	107	107		45 ± 1	b
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1	55	73		44 ± 14	41 ± 1
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1	82	43		72 ± 5	55 ± 5
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1	57	43		79 ± 6	b
SK-15		0.35 mol L-1	57	a		b	a
SK-15	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	83	94		25 ± 1	33 ± 1
SK-15		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	91	82		32 ± 1	37 ± 1
SK-15		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	55	55		31 ± 1	40 ± 0
SK-15		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	107	143		b	b
SRC	200	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	50	65		7 ± 0	22 ± 0
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	27	36		12 ± 1	35 ± 0
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	27	55		b	b
SRC		0.35 mol L-1 + H2O2	54	71		b	b
SRC	240	3.0 mol L-1 + H2O2	38	52		1 ± 0	9 ± 0
SRC		1.4 mol L-1 + H2O2	32	41		4 ± 0	23 ± 4
SRC		0.7 mol L-1 + H2O2	54	45		8 ± 1	56 ± 2

• ^a
  Determinations were not made in these conditions;
• ^b
  solid dark particles in digests. SRC: single reaction chamber.

As shown in Table 6, residual acidities using the MAXI 44 rotor for rice flour digestions with H₂O₂ were around 100% and for bovine liver were around 90%. These values were around 100 and 80%, respectively, without using H₂O₂. Both conditions indicated that, as expected, nitric acid was regenerated during the digestion process and this effect is related to the vessel shape and gradients of temperature in the gas phase, liquid phase and tube walls, particularly during the initial step of microwave-assisted heating process. Bizzi et al.¹³ have clearly demonstrated these effects by measuring gas and liquid phases temperatures along the heating program using thermographic images and a sapphire thermocouple.

Analytical performance: SK-15

The digests of bovine liver samples obtained using the SK-15 rotor without H₂O₂ (Figure 3a) presented dark solid particles when using 0.7 mol L^-1 HNO₃. Based on this observation, digestion was not evaluated using 0.35 mol L^-1 nitric acid solution. The presence of solid residues after digestion can be explained because bovine liver contains higher variety of lipid structures than rice flour.¹⁴ However, digests had a better visual aspect when using the mixture composed by nitric acid plus hydrogen peroxide (Figure 3b). It can be seen in Table 4 that best recoveries were reached when using 3 and 1.4 mol L^-1HNO₃plus H₂O₂.

Figure 3
Digests obtained using SK-15 vessels and different nitric acid concentrations at 200 °C. (a) Bovine liver digests without H₂O₂; (b) bovine liver digests with H₂O₂; (c) rice flour digests without H₂O₂; (d) rice flour digests with H₂O₂.

On the other hand, the digests of rice flour samples obtained without H₂O₂ in the same conditions of heating program and nitric acid concentrations had a good visual aspect, except for 0.35 mol L^-1 HNO₃ (Figure 3c). As previously observed for bovine liver, visual aspect of rice flour digests was improved when hydrogen peroxide was added to nitric acid solution for promoting digestions. In general, both digestion conditions led to good recoveries for all tested nitric acid solutions (Table 5), however, recoveries of Fe and Cu in 0.35 mol L^-1 HNO₃ were not quantitative. It is known that Fe is not easily recovered from plant tissues due to combination with matrix elements, particularly Si.^10,11

The residual acidities for digestions with HNO₃ plus H₂O₂ of rice flour and bovine liver were in the range of 82 to 143%. These values decreased up to 43% when digestion was performed without H₂O₂. This behavior is expected considering the mechanism involved for regeneration of nitric acid and its dependence on the amount of oxygen available in the closed vessel.¹²

The RCC was analyzed only for digestions without solid residues in the final solution. RCC were around 40% for rice flour and bovine liver digests with 3 mol L^-1 HNO₃ without using H₂O₂ (Table 6). For digestions performed using lower concentrations of HNO₃ (1.4 and 0.7 mol L^-1) without H₂O₂, RCCs of rice flour samples were around 71 and 78% and for bovine liver 55%. It can be observed that the RCC of digests obtained using the SK-15 vessels for rice flour and bovine liver samples with 3, 1.4 and 0.7 mol L^-1HNO₃plus H₂O₂ resulted in RCCs below 40%.

Analytical performance: SRC technology

According to Figure 4a, bovine liver digests obtained using the SRC at 200 °C and 0.35 and 0.7 mol L^-1 HNO₃ plus H₂O₂ had appreciable amounts of solid residues. At higher concentrations of nitric acid, digests had better visual aspect with lower amount of solid residues. As it can be observed in Table 4, in general, quantitative recoveries were obtained for all nitric acid solutions, except for Ca and Fe for most nitric acid solutions and Cu in 0.35 mol L^-1 nitric acid.

Figure 4
Digests obtained using the SRC technology and different nitric acid concentrations. (a) Bovine liver digests with H₂O₂ at 200 °C; (b) rice flour digests with H₂O₂ at 200 °C; (c) rice flour digests with H₂O₂ at 240 °C; (d) bovine liver digests with H₂O₂ at 240 °C.

As it can be seen in Figure 4b, rice flour digests obtained at 200 °C using nitric acid plus H₂O₂ had better visual aspect in 3 and 1.4 mol L^-1 of HNO₃ solutions, however, 0.70 and 0.35 mol L^-1 acid solutions contained residual solids. As shown in Table 5, in general, quantitative recoveries were reached for most elements, except for Fe, Na and Cu, in all nitric acid solutions.

Figures 4c and 4d show better visual aspect for rice flour and bovine liver digests obtained applying a maximum temperature of 240 °C compared to digests obtained at 200 °C, but solid residues still remained when using 0.70 mol L^-1 HNO₃. At 240 °C, 0.35 mol L^-1 HNO₃ was not tested because even when using 0.70 mol L^-1 HNO₃ digestion was not efficient. As observed in Table 5 for rice flour digests, using 3 mol L^-1 HNO₃, the determination of the analytes was efficient, except for Mn and P. The determination of the analytes was efficient for bovine liver digests obtained at 240 °C using 3 and 1.4 mol L^-1 HNO₃, except for Fe at 1.4 mol L^-1.

Analyzing all digests for both samples and using both heating programs, when applying SRC technology the acid digestion mixture should contain at least 1.4 or 3 mol L^-1HNO₃ plus H₂O₂. It was also observed that at higher temperature, i.e., 240 °C, the determination of analytes was more accurate than at lower temperature, i.e., 200 °C. When the temperature increases, the oxidative power of the dilute nitric acid solution also increases. Generally, better recoveries of analytes were obtained when using 3 or 1.4 mol L^-1 HNO₃ at digestion temperature of 240 ºC.

Residual acidities in digests obtained using the SRC technology at 200 °C were around 40 and 55% for rice flour and bovine liver, respectively. For other rice flour digestions at 240 °C, residual acidities were also around 40% (Table 6). These values indicate that nitric acid regeneration was less significant than that observed when using microwave cavity conventional oven. This effect is expected taking into account the different forms of heating. It is important to remember that for the SRC technology reactions vessels are immersed in a water/acid base load that absorbs microwave radiation and transfer the heat to the solutions contained in the reaction vessels.

The percentage of RCCs was analyzed only for digests without solid residues. Rice flour samples digested at 200 °C with 3 and 1.4 mol L^-1 HNO₃ presented RCCs around 7 and 12%, respectively (Table 6). The RCCs for bovine liver samples digested at these same conditions were around 22 and 35%, respectively. By increasing the temperature to 240 °C, digestions were more efficient with RCCs varying from 1 to 4% for rice flour samples and from 9 to 23% for bovine liver samples. The SRC technology led to the best RCC results when comparing all vessels evaluated.

General comments

The use of digestions vessels with different shapes and heights as shown in Figure 1, influences HNO₃ condensation because taller vessels, e.g., MAXI 44, present a more pronounced gradient of temperature. As a consequence, this aspect affects the quality and efficiency of the digestion. In the SRC technology, the used vessel has 1.3 cm of internal diameter and 13 cm of height. Consequently, condensation of nitric acid is limited because of the small volume and small height of the vessel. Moreover, as previously mentioned, the heating process is different because microwave radiation is absorbed by the base load solution inserted into the SRC. On the other hand, the MAXI 44 vessels are taller with 23.6 cm of height and 2.3 cm of internal diameter. These volume and height increase the temperature gradient and improve the regeneration of nitric acid leading to a more efficient digestion as can be visually observed (Figure 2). The SK-15 vessels have about the same volume of MAXI 44, but with different dimensions: i.e., 13 cm of height and 3.2 cm of diameter. These vessels are shorter and larger, increasing the contact area of solution and decreasing the gradient of temperature. Consequently, regeneration of nitric acid is less efficient.

It can be seen in Table 6 that digests obtained using H₂O₂, in general, had lower RCCs and better acid regeneration when compared to digestions performed without using this reagent.

Characterization of reactions products by ¹H NMR

In order to identify the characteristics of residual organic compounds of bovine liver sample when digested with 1.4 mol L^-1 HNO₃ with or without H₂O₂, the ¹H NMR spectra were evaluated and the presence of organic residues in aliphatic (0.7-4.5 ppm) (Figure 5a) and aromatic regions (6.0-10.2 ppm) (Figure 5b) were demonstrated. In general, reaction conditions in MAXI 44 vessel led to higher amounts of organic residues after the sample digestion compared to reaction conditions when using SK-15 and the SRC technology, which presented intermediate and smaller quantities of residues, respectively. It can be observed in Figure 5 that digestion conditions without using H₂O₂ in MAXI 44 presented more intense signals (black spectra) when compared to the spectrum of MAXI 44 in the presence of H₂O₂ (red spectra). On the other hand, both conditions, i.e., with or without H₂O₂, using the SK-15 rotor led to similar spectra. However, spectra obtained using the SRC technology were different. In Figure 5, according to the orange and yellow spectra, respectively, sample digestion using the SRC technology at 240 °C presented the lowest variety of signals when compared to the digestion using the same equipment but at 200 °C and also when compared to the others spectra. These results are expected taking into account the conditions of digestion either in each reaction vessel or in each temperature for the SRC technology. It is also important to mention that, as expected, digestion processes are dependent on closed vessels design, reagents and heating programs, but as earlier demonstrated by Würfels et al.^15,16 the characteristics of the chemical compounds also exerted a critical influence on digestion efficiencies and residual compounds present in digests.

Figure 5
¹H NMR spectra of organic residues in aliphatic region (a) and aromatic region (b) of digested samples in different conditions: black and red spectra (MAXI 44 without and with H₂O₂, respectively); green and purple spectra (SK-15 without and with H₂O₂, respectively); yellow and orange spectra (SRC technology at 200 and 240 °C, respectively).

Conclusions

These simple experiments demonstrate how the digestion efficiency of samples is critically dependent on the choice of the reaction vessel. Despite using the same heating program, the digestion efficiency is dependent on the vessel design and this aspect is related to the availability of oxygen and magnitude of the gradient of temperature to allow effective regeneration of nitric acid. The occurrence of this process was more effective when working with taller vessels and when adding hydrogen peroxide to nitric acid solution. In this sense, the use of MAXI 44 rotor is beneficial when not adopting extreme conditions of temperature for promoting digestions. It was demonstrated that quantitative recoveries were obtained when using both rotors, i.e., MAXI 44 and SK-15, even when working with nitric acid concentration as low as 0.35 mol L^-1 for some elements. On the other hand, when working with the SRC technology the conditions of digestions are easily improved by increasing the maximum temperature applied for performing digestions as shown in Figure 4.

The RCCs reached lower values when working with the SRC technology. This better efficiency compared to other procedures can also be checked by visual observation of the digests. The ¹H NMR spectra also confirm these observations.

It can be concluded that proper application of tailored procedures to specific aims is critically dependent on thoughtful evaluation of sample characteristics and equipment performance.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 305201/2018-2 and 428558/2018-6) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES/PNPD-Graduate Program in Chemistry, Federal University of São Carlos). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES)-finance code 001. Instrumental support provided by Analítica (São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and Milestone (Sorisole, BG, Italy) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also would like to express their gratitude to the Instituto Nacional de Ciências e Tecnologias Analíticas Avançadas-CNPq, grant No. 573894/2008-6 and FAPESP, grant No. 2014/50951-4.

References

• ¹
  Introduction to Microwave Sample Preparation Theory and Practice, 1^st ed.; Kingston, H. M.; Jassie, L. B., eds.; ACS: Washington, USA, 1988.
• ²
  Microwave-Enhanced Chemistry Fundamentals, Sample Preparation, and Applications, 1^st ed.; Kingston, H. M.; Haswell, S. J., eds.; ACS: Washington, USA, 1997.
• ³
  Métodos de Preparo de Amostras para Análise Elementar, 2^nd ed.; Krug, F. J.; Rocha, F. R. P., eds.; SBQ: São Paulo, Brazil, 2019.
• ⁴
  Microwave-Assisted Sample Preparation for Trace Element Determination, 1^st ed.; Flores, E. M. M., ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014.
• ⁵
  Bizzi, C. A.; Pedrotti, M. F.; Silva, J. S.; Barin, J. S.; Nóbrega, J. A.; Flores, E. M. M.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2017, 32, 1448.
• ⁶
  Bizzi, C. A.; Flores, E. M. M.; Barin, J. S.; Garcia, E. E.; Nóbrega, J. A.; Microchem. J. 2011, 99, 193.
• ⁷
  Miranda, K.; Pereira Filho, E. R.; Gomes Neto, J. A.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2014, 29, 825.
• ⁸
  Lautenschläger, W.; Nóbrega, J. A.; Bizzi, C. A.; Carnaroglio, D.; Colnaghi, G.; Sample Preparation for Elemental Analysis: from Evolution to Revolution. The Invention, the Technology, and the Benefits of the Single Reaction Chamber (SRC), 1^st ed.; Milestone: Sorisole, Italy, 2020.
• ⁹
  Wieteska, E.; Zióek, A.; Drzewińska, A.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 330, 251.
• ¹⁰
  Sucharová, J.; Suchara, J.; Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 576, 163.
• ¹¹
  Tavernies, I.; de Loose, M.; van Bockstaele, E.; TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 535.
• ¹²
  Bizzi, C. A.; Flores, E. M. M.; Nóbrega, J. A.; Oliveira, J. S. S.; Schmidt, L.; Mortari, S. R.; J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2014, 29, 332.
• ¹³
  Bizzi, C. A.; Barin, J. S.; Oliveira, J. S. S.; Cravotto, G.; Flores, E. M. M.; J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2017, 28, 1673.
• ¹⁴
  Amaral, C. D. B.; Fialho, L. L.; Camargo, F. P. R.; Pirola, C.; Nóbrega, J. A.; Talanta 2016, 160, 354.
• ¹⁵
  Würfels, M.; Jackwerth, E.; Stoeppler, M.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1989, 226, 1.
• ¹⁶
  Würfels, M.; Jackwerth, E.; Stoeppler, M.; Anal. Chim. Acta 1989, 226, 17.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  29 Mar 2021
• Date of issue
  Apr 2021

History

• Received
  08 Aug 2020
• Accepted
  10 Nov 2020