Cathodic cage plasma nitriding of austenitic stainless steel (AISI 316): influence of the working pressure on the nitrided layers properties

Cathodic cage plasma nitriding of austenitic stainless steel (AISI 316): influence of the working pressure on the nitrided layers properties

R.R.M. de Sousa^I,*; F.O. de Araújo^II; L.C. Gontijo^III; J.A.P. da Costa^IV; I.O. Nascimento^V; C. Alves Jr^V

^IGrupo de Pesquisa em Materiais e Metrologia, Departamento de Mecânica, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Piauí-IFPI, Teresina, PI, Brazil

^IIDepartamento de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido - UFERSA, Mossoró, RN, Brazil

^IIICoordenadoria de Ciência e Tecnologia-Física, Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo-IFES, CEP 29040-780 Vitória, ES, Brazil

^IVDepartamento de Física, Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - UERN, Mossoró, RN, Brazil

^VLaboratório de Processamento de Materiais por Plasma - LabPlasma, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Campus Universitário, CEP 59072-970 Natal, RN, Brazil

ABSTRACT

In this work, the influence of working pressure on the characteristics of the layers produced by the nitriding treatment on the AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel surface using the Cathodic Cage Plasma Nitriding technique (CCPN) is assessed. The treatments were carried out at a temperature of 723 K for 5 hours under working pressures of 120, 250 and 500 Pa. The morphology, microstructure and corrosion resistance were studied through optical microscopy, x-ray diffraction, and electrochemical potential curves. We analyzed the effects of working pressure on the layer thickness, microhardness and corrosion resistance. The E×i curves and the electrochemical impedance of polarized samples were measured in order to investigate the effect of the ion transfer inside the produced film placed into the anodic solution. The electrochemical impedance of the films were measured, and showed an apparent capacitive behavior. For treatment under a pressure of 120 Pa we found the nitrides Fe₃N, Fe₄N and CrN. For treatment at a pressure of 250 Pa, the CrN disappears and the observed phases are the nitrides Fe₃N, Fe₄N and the S-phase. For a treatment pressure of 500 Pa there is an increase in the corrosion resistance of nitrided layers, confirmed by the predominance of S-Phase in the x-ray diffraction pattern. On the other hand, the sample nitrided under the pressure of 250 Pa showed very unstable impedance behavior when immersed in NaCl solution, indicating that the treatment at this specific working pressure has a negative effect on the corrosion resistance of plasma nitrided AISI 316 stainless steel surfaces.

Keywords: cathodic cage technique, AISI 316, corrosion resistance, working pressure

1. Introduction

Stainless steel is of great use in engineering due to its high resistance to corrosion, presenting, however, low wear resistance and reduced microhardness. These last two properties are significantly improved through ionic nitriding^1-3. It is known that the nitriding of austenitic stainless steel at temperatures superior to 723 K produces layers having good wear resistance and elevated microhardness. However, due to chromium nitride precipitation the corrosion resistance decreases due to chromium depletion in the adjacent regions of the matrix. On the other hand, when the nitriding treatment is carried out at lower temperatures, the formation of chromium nitride is inhibited due to a decrease in the diffusion of chromium, and a nitrogen supersaturated phase called expanded austenite (γ_N), or S-phase, which possesses elevated microhardness and wear resistance associated with a good corrosion resistance^4-10, is formed.

Control of the nitriding process parameters^11,12 has been carried out in order to improve the supersaturated layer (S-phase), which is a solid solution of nitrogen in the austenite phase, presenting a good thickness and adherence to the substrate, making possible an effective improvement in the superficial microhardness and corrosion resistance of the materials. The treatment time and temperature have been the mostly used parameters in the plasma nitriding processes for modifying the microstructure and phase composition of the formed layers, determining important physical and chemical properties of the nitrided layer such as nitrogen incorporation^2,10,13.

The influence of other parameters, such as gas composition¹⁴, pulse frequency¹⁵, sample geometry¹⁶ and the superficial characteristics of the modified layers have been receiving special attention in conventional plasma nitriding treatment, as have the influence of the treatment under different pressures in R.F. plasma nitriding processes^17,18 and ionic implantation by immersion¹⁹. However, in cathodic cage plasma nitriding the influence of the working pressure on the physical and chemical properties of the treated surfaces has hardly been studied. This technique uses the same equipment as the conventional nitriding process but with the addition of a new set-up introduced by the addition of a cage on the working table as shown in Figure 1. The cage has a cylindrical shape with a top lid, made of a 0.9 mm thick perforated austenitic stainless steel sheet, with uniformly distributed round holes of 10 mm diameter.

In order to fill this need, we investigate the influence of work pressure on the physical and chemical properties of the layers produced by the nitriding of the surface of stainless steel ANSI 316 using the cathodic cage plasma nitriding technique^12,20.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Experimental procedures

The samples, cut in disc specimens of 12 mm diameter 10mm height made of AISI 316 stainless steel with a chemical composition(wt. %) of 16-18%Cr; 10-14%Ni; 2-3%Mo; 0,08%C; 2%Mn; 1%Si; 0,04%P; 0,03%S; 0.02%Al and Fe (balance), were plasma-nitrided using the cathodic cage plasma technique with the following treatment parameters: a treatment temperature of 723 K, during 5.0 hours, at three different working pressures (120, 250, and 500 Pa). The cage has a cylindrical shape with 112 mm diameter and 25 mm of height, made of 0.8 mm thick austenitic stainless steel AISI 316 perforated sheet which had equally distributed round holes of 8 mm diameter. The samples were placed on the workpiece which was insulated from the cathode by an alumina disc, in order to maintain the samples under a floating potential.

A schematic diagram of the experimental arrangement is shown in Figure 1. The nitriding atmosphere consisted of a mixture of 80 vol. % N_{2 -} 20 vol. % H₂ in a total flow of 20 sccm. After the treatment, the samples were cooled inside the camera under a nitrogen flow until reaching a temperature of 353 K in order to reduce the risks of oxidation.

After a mechanical polishing with SiC paper, the samples were attacked with an acid solution (75% HCl + 25% HNO₃) to make optical metallography. The microstructure of the layers were analyzed using an optical microscope (Olympus BX60M), and the phase composition was analyzed using x-ray diffraction (XRD) operated with Cu Kα radiation (α = 1.540 Å) at 40 KV (Shimadzu, XRD-6000). The micro-hardness (HV) of the treated surfaces was measured with a micro-hardness test Pantec, model 1000 used in the Vickers mode with a charge of 100g.

The corrosion resistance of the sample surface modified by plasma nitriding were evaluated at room temperature using metallographic examination, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and the potentiodynamic anodic polarization curves obtained in a cell with 3,5 wt.% NaCl solution in distilled water. The cell was in a three-electrode setup: a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), a platinum auxiliary electrode and a working electrode (sample), using a scan rate of 1.0 × 10^-3 V/s.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of nitrided layers

The measured values of the working pressure, microhardness tests and corresponding layer thickness are presented in Table 1. Note that the thickness of the layers varies inversely with working pressure.

The reduction of the layer thickness as a function of increase in working pressure is the opposite of the behavior that is observed in conventional ionic nitriding for this range of working pressure. This behavior occurs because, in the cathodic cage technique, an increase in working pressure causes a decrease in the mobility and in the mean free path of the ions, consequently decreasing the number of ions that reach the internal surface of the cage holes which are responsible for the hollow cathode effect, sputtering ions from their surface. On the other hand, when the working pressure in the chamber decreases, the number of ions that reach the hole surface is increased and the sputtered ions from this surface increase the ion flow that reaches the substrate, producing a more efficient deposition on the surface of the sample^21,22. Since the samples are under a floating potential and the ion plasma density is low, any deleterious effects on the surface of the samples (substrate) are negligible. In this way, any specimen that is deposited on the substrate remains on the surface until absorbed by diffusion to form the new phase underneath the surface. In the cathodic cage technique, unlike in conventional ionic nitriding, there is no competition between adsorption and sputtering of the specimens that are deposited on the surface. On the other hand, in conventional ionic nitriding when an increase on the gas pressure occurs the effect of the deposition is dominant with respect to the sputtering produced by the ions on the sample surface producing a thicker layer. However, this increase is limited by the saturation of nitrogen in the surface, since in a pressure of the order of 100 to 200 Pa, the thermodynamic equilibrium of nitrogen plasma species^19,23 occur.

Figure 2 shows the microstructure on the cross-section of the layers nitrided at 723 K, for 5.0 hours, at different pressures (120, 250, and 500 Pa) by cathodic cage plasma nitriding. The optical micrographs of the samples nitrided at 120 Pa (Figure 2a), 250 Pa (Figure 2b) and 500 Pa (Figure 2c) show the austenitic substrate and a thin top layer with thickness of about 64.5, 31.6, and 12.5 µm, respectively, identified by XRD as the γ'-Fe₄N, ε-Fe₃N, and CrN in Figure 2a, as the γ'-Fe₄N, ε-Fe₃N, and S-phase in Figure 2b, and finally as the S-phase in Figure 2c.

The microhardness tests indicate that a smaller value was obtained for the layer of the sample nitrided at 500 Pa, due to the predominant presence of S-phase as shown in the X-rays diffractogram (Figure 3). Results presented in the micrographs are consonant with the analyses of diffraction presented in Figure 3. A bright region, characteristic of the expanded austenite (S-phase), is observed on samples nitrided at 250 Pa and 500 Pa. These layers show a predominance of S-phase, as can be observed in x-rays diffractograms. However, the sample nitrided at 120 Pa does not present this bright region, as confirmed by the absence of S-phase in the X-ray diffractograms (Figure 3). The greater thickness of the layer for the sample nitrided at 120 Pa can be explained by the formation of chromium nitrides and the decomposition of metastable phase (expanded austenite) into more stable phases (iron nitrides).

This result is in consonance with layers formed on glass substrate samples, where we have only the deposition process of compounds formed in the bulk plasma²⁴.

3.2. Resistance to corrosion

3.2.1. NaCl 3,5% Solution

Figure 4 displays the anodic polarization curves for the untreated and cathodic cage plasma nitrided AISI 316L stainless steel samples in 3,5 wt. % NaCl solution. Polarization curves indicate that anodic behavior depends on the partial pressure of the gases involved in the nitriding process. Apparently the anodic polarization curves moves to lower current density when the partial pressures increases. It means that the anodic dissolution current for the layer formed on austenitic stainless steel is small when the pressure is increased, indicating that the corrosion resistance of the nitrided layer formed depends on the working pressure. The corrosion current density obtained by the Tafel extrapolation method also indicate that the corrosion resistance of the nitrided layers depends on the working pressure, since their values decrease with pressure, which is highlighted in the inset of Figure 4. The inset figure presents the logarithm of corrosion current density as a function of the nitriding working pressure. It is observed that there is an exponential relationship between the increase of pressure and corrosion current density. This result is in agreement with the polarization curves and x-ray difractograms of the nitrided samples, since they indicate that an increase in pressure produces an increase in the formation of S-phase, thus favoring an increase in the corrosion resistance. It can be observed that the anodic behavior of the matrix in chloride solutions is represented by a curve with an active dissolution at low potentials, followed by a region of approximately constant current density and a pitting potential around 0.39 V, which represents a drop in the passivity, indicating the pitting formation. This also appears in the sample nitrided at a pressure of 500 Pa, with a higher pitting potential, as can be seen in Figure 4. While susceptibility to pitting of the untreated sample and the nitrided sample under a pressure of 500 Pa are similar, the samples treated at pressures of 120 Pa and 250 Pa did not show a well defined pitting potential and had a lower pitting susceptibility (see Figure 4).

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) experiments were carried out in NaCl 3.5 wt. % solution, after a stabilization time of 1800 seconds, at potentials equal to E_cor determined by Tafel analysis as well as by the open circuit potential (OCP). All spectra were acquired over a frequency range of 1.0 × 10⁴ Hz to 4.0 × 10^-2 Hz using an automated Ivium impedance analyzer. The equivalent electrical circuits (Figure 5) are proposed based on the simulation of the EIS data for the corrosion behavior of the films. The results are similar to that proposed in other thin film (ZnO) studied for the untreated and for the sample nitride at 500 Pa pressure, e.g.^25,26. However the samples treated at pressures of 120 and 250 Pa showed a different circuit as shown in Table 2 and Figure 5. This fact also confirms that the properties of films formed depends on the working pressure.

Figure 6 displays the Nyquist plots for the EIS study as measured by immersion in 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution on the cathodic cage plasma-nitrided samples surface. The profile of the plots reveals a semicircle. The diameter of the semicircles increases with increase of the working pressure. The extended curve of the semicircle will intercept the horizontal axis at two points. As the distance between these interceptions is used to estimate the resistance to corrosion, we reaffirm the dependence of corrosion resistance on the working pressure. The results are represented in the Table 2, where R1 represents the resistance of corrosive medium in the solution (i.e., 3.5 wt.% NaCl) and R2 the polarization resistance of the film formed on the sample surface by the plasma-nitrided technique, whereas CPE1 displays the constant phase element equivalent to capacitance of the electrical layer. In these cases the diameter of the semicircle which corresponds to the corrosion resistance for each film has a smaller value for the sample formed at a pressure of 120 Pa compared to the other samples therefore the corrosion rate for this film is expected to be the largest. The element R1 refers to the resistance of the electrolyte which is approximately constant for all samples. We observe for the sample treated under the pressure of 250 Pa an increase for the parameter CPE1-T and a decrease for R2 value - resistant polarization - indicating a passive layer with more defects or less thick. On the other hand, values of R2 and CPE1-P for the sample formed under the pressure of 500 Pa had the highest values. This indicates a higher capacitive degree of the passive layer formed during the treatment, due to a passive layer with fewer defects, thicker or with better density.

In the case of the sample formed at a pressure of 250 Pa the values of R2 and CPE1-P decreases, this may be due to leakage current in electrical layers. This leakage current leads to corrosion acceleration that may be attributed to the porosities or any other problem produced on the film, due to previous corrosion, thus allowing the electrolyte to access the subjacent substrate so that the dissolved substrate also affects the total corrosion of the films, including changing the resistance of corrosive medium in the solution (R1), as shown in Table 2. The EIS study confirms the results of dc-polarization in Figure 6.

According to the Bode plot (Figure 6b) the samples formed under pressures of 120 and 500 Pa showed a rapid decrease of impedance in the capacitive region, which is characteristic of the pitting process on stainless steel. Furthermore, the phase angle (θ) tends toward zero at low frequencies, indicating that the resistance of the barrier layer was reached. These changes in the spectra at very low frequencies indicate the occurrence of pitting and are in agreement with visual inspection. On the other hand, the sample nitrided under the pressure of 250 Pa; shows two time constants, resulting from the presence of structural differences in the oxide film formed on the metallic material. The impedance and phase angle values in the low frequency region are associated with a layer rich in chromium oxide at the interface of the metal. As can be seen phase angle of the sample decreased. This may be due to the chromium depletion in the treated surface which prevents the formation of a good passive layer which could effectively protect the surface from the aggressive environment.

4. Conclusions

The thicker layer, obtained at lower pressures, is due to the increase in the mean free path of the particles that reach the holes of the cathodic cage, increasing the rate of sputtering in these holes surface, and, as no sputtering occurs on the sample surface, since it is under a floating potential, as a consequence there is an increase in the deposition rate forming thicker layers.

On the other hand the hardness decreases as the working pressure increases due to the lower layer thickness. However, for a higher working pressure the predominance of S-phase occurs as shown in the x-rays diffractograms, indicating that there is an increase in the corrosion resistance of nitrided layers, confirmed by the polarization curves.

Furthermore, there are other factors, such as the chemical attack used for optical metallographic analysis that may modify this behavior, since the sample with the highest percentage of S-phase treated at a pressure of 500 Pa did not present the best corrosion resistance.

Therefore, using cathodic cage plasma nitriding technique, the working pressure control allows one to obtain processed layers of different thicknesses and/or with high corrosion resistance and good microhardness value. In this work where the treatment time was 5 hours the best conditions obtained for mechanical properties was for a pressure of 250 Pa indicating that we need a longer treatment time for a working pressure of 500 Pa in order to obtain thicker layers and better corrosion resistance as should be expected due the predominance of the S-phase.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by CAPES and CNPq and the used stainless steel was supplied by Villares Metals S.A.

Received: May 3, 2013

Revised: November 20, 2013

References

• 1. Zang ZL and Bell T. Structure and corrosion resistance of plasma nitrided stainless steel. Surface Engineering 1995;1(2):131.
• 2. Menthe E and Rie KT. Further investigation of the structure and properties of austenitic stainless steel after plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1999;116-119:199-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00085-7
• 3. Cheng Z, Li C X, Dong H and Bell T. Low temperature plasma nitrocarburising of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology 2005;191:195-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.004
• 4. Menthe E, Bulak A, Olfe J, Zimermann A and Rie KT. Improvement of the mechanical properties of austenitic stainless steel after plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology 2000;133-134:259-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00930-0
• 5. Li CX and Bell T. Corrosion properties of active screen plasma nitrided 316 austenitic stainless steel. Corrosion Science 2004;46:1527-1547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.015
• 6. Samandi M, Shedden BA, Smith DFI, Collins GA, Hutchings R and Tendys J. Microstructure, corrosion and tribological behaviour of plasma immersion ion-implanted austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology 1993;59:261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0257-8972(93)90094-5
• 7. Picard S, Memet JB, Sabot R, Grosseau-Poussard JL, Rivière J-P and Meilland R. Corrosion behaviour, microhardness and surface characterisation of low energy, high current ion implanted austenitic stainless steel. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2001;303:163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01841-4
• 8. Ichii K, Fujimura K and Takase T. Structure of the ion-nitrided layer of 18-8 stainless steel. Technology Reports of the Kansai University. 1986;27:135.
• 9. Angelini E, Burdese A and DeBenedetti B. Ion-Nitriding of Austenitic Stainless SteelMetall. SciTechnol 1988;6:33.
• 10. Marchev K, Cooper CV, Blucher JT and Giessen BC. Conditions for the formation of a martensitic single-phase compound layer in ion-nitrided 316L austenitic stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology 1998;99:225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00532-X
• 11. Li CX, Georges J and Li XY. Active screen plasma nitriding of austenitic stainless steel. Surface Engineering 2002;18(6):453-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/026708402225006240
• 12. Alves C Jr, Araujo FO, Ribeiro KJB, Costa JAP, Sousa RRM and Sousa RS. Use of cathodic cage in plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology 2006;201:2450-2454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.014
• 13. Bacci T, Borgioli F, Galvanetto E and Pradelli G. Glow-discharge nitriding of sintered stainless steels. Surface and Coatings Technology 2001;139:251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01010-6
• 14. Priest JM, Baldwina MJ and Fewella MP. The action of hydrogen in low-pressure r.f.-plasma nitriding. Surface and Coatings Technology 2001;145:152-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01311-1
• 15. Alves C Jr, Rodrigues JA and Martinelli AE. Effect of pulse width on the microstructure of d.c.-plasma-nitrided layers. Surface and Coatings Technology 1999;122:112-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00326-6
• 16. Alves C Jr., Silva EF and Martinelli AE. Effect of workpiece geometry on the uniformity of nitrided layers. Surface and coating Technology 2001;139:1-5.
• 17. Borgioli F, Fossati A, Galvanetto E, Bacci T and Pradelli G. Glow discharge nitriding of AISI 316L austenitic stainless steel: influence of treatment pressure. Surface and Coatings Technology 2006;200:5505-5513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.07.073
• 18. Baldwin MJ, Fewell MP, Haydon SC, Kumar S, Collins GA, Short KT et al. Rf-plasma nitriding of stainless steel. Surface and Coatings Technology 1998;98:1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00150-3
• 19. Fewell MP, Mitchell DRG, Priest JM, Short KT and Collins GA. The nature of expanded austenite. Surface and Coatings Technology 2000;131:284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00793-3
• 20. Sousa RRM, Araujo FO, Ribeiro KJB, Mendes MWD, Costa JAP and Alves C Jr. Cathodic cage of samples with different dimensions. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2007;465:223-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.03.007
• 21. Moller W, Parascandola S, Telbizova T, Günzel R and Richter E. Surface processes and diffusion mechanisms of ion nitriding of stainless steel and aluminium. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2001;136:73-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01015-X
• 22. Dimitrov VI, D'haen J, Knuyt G, Quaeyhaegens C and Stals LM. A method for determination of the effective diffusion coefficient and sputtering rate during plasma diffusion treatment. Surface and Coatings Technology 1998;99:234-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00530-6
• 23. Jeong B-Y and Kim M-H. Effects of the process parameters on the layer formation behavior of plasma nitrided steels. Surface and Coatings Technology 2001;141:182-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01232-4
• 24. Araujo FO, Sousa RRM, Costa JAP and Alves C Jr. Deposition of metallic films on glass substrate using Cathodic Cage Technique. Revista Brasileira de Aplicações de Vácuo 2009;27:149-152.
• 25. Lin J-C, Chuang C-L, Lai C-M, Chu H-C and Chen Y-S. On the oxygen reduction reaction catalyzed by Ti -Cu binary films in 0.5 M sulfuric acid solution. Thin Solid Films 2009;517:4777-4781.
• 26. Al-Hardan NH, Abdullah MJ, Ahmad H, Abdul Aziz A and Low LY. Investigation on UV photodetector behavior of RF-sputtered ZnO by impedance spectroscopy. Solid-State Electronics 2011;55:59-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2010.09.003

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  06 Dec 2013
• Date of issue
  Apr 2014

History

• Accepted
  20 Nov 2013
• Received
  03 May 2013