ABSTRACT
Purpose: to assess the recognition of salty, sweet, and citrus tastes in complete denture wearers.
Methods: the study included toothless individuals (experimental group) who had been using, for at least 3 months and at the most 5 years, acrylic resin removable bimaxillary complete dentures in good condition and with adequate maxillo-mandibular relationship. The same assessment was performed in the control group, which had 26 toothed individuals. Volunteers had no difficulties ingesting any type of food. Salty, sweet, and citrus tastes were assessed with filter paper strips soaked in such solutions and placed on the tongue dorsum. Assessments were performed in duplicate and in random order.
Results: the percentage rate of errors was similar between the control (9.6±13.5%) and experimental groups (10.5±15.5%) (p=0.80). There was no difference in the frequency of correct perception of tastes between denture wearers and toothed individuals.
Conclusion: individuals who wore acrylic resin removable bimaxillary complete dentures perceived salty, sweet, and citrus tastes like toothed individuals did.
Keywords: Periodontal Prosthesis; Water Flavor; Deglutition; Taste Disorders; Taste Buds
RESUMO
Objetivo: avaliar o reconhecimento dos sabores salgado, doce e cítrico em usuários de prótese dentária total.
Métodos: foram incluídos indivíduos desdentados (grupo experimental) usuários de prótese total removível bimaxilar confeccionada em resina acrílica, com tempo mínimo de uso de três meses e máximo de cinco anos, em bom estado de conservação e com adequada relação maxilo-mandibular. Como grupo controle, a mesma avaliação foi realizada em 26 indivíduos dentados. Os voluntários não tinham dificuldade na ingestão de nenhum tipo de alimento. Os sabores salgado, doce e cítrico foram testados com fitas de papel filtro embebidas nas soluções e colocadas na parte dorsal da língua. As avaliações foram realizadas em duplicata e em ordem ao acaso.
Resultados: a taxa percentual de erros foi igual entre os grupos controle (9,6±13,5%) e experimental (10,5±15,5%) (p=0,80). Não houve diferenças na frequência de percepção correta dos sabores entre indivíduos usuários de prótese e indivíduos dentados.
Conclusão: usuários de prótese total removível bimaxilar confeccionada em resina acrílica têm a mesma percepção dos sabores salgado, doce e cítrico que indivíduos dentados.
Descritores: Prótese Periodontal; Sabor da Água; Deglutição; Distúrbios do Paladar; Papilas Gustativas
INTRODUCTION
Oral sensitivity is important to adapt swallowing-related events to the bolus characteristics1,2. This adaptation ensures effective and safe swallowing of boluses with different temperatures, volumes, consistencies, compositions, and tastes. The correct perception of liquid and solid boluses requires a complex and intense innervation of the organs involved in the process3-5, which is necessary for an adequate motor response5,6. When sensitivity is blocked, swallowing may become difficult and the bolus may be aspired to the airways7,8.
Tactile and pain sensitivity in toothless people’s oral mucosa9 and their taste recognition may be impaired. However, this verification in complete denture wearers is still controversial - some studies demonstrate the denture does not influence taste perception10,11, while others demonstrate such an influence12-14. Different tastes are perceived throughout the tongue, with the palate’s participation15. Since dentures cover the whole palate, taste in this case may be affected. Moreover, the material from which dentures are made (i.e., acrylic resin) is subject to sorption and solubility16 over time, which could be a factor in changes in taste.
The possibility of impaired taste perception in complete denture wearers may explain swallowing changes found in these individuals17,18. Oropharyngeal sensory perception is essential to begin and control swallowing19.
This investigation aimed to assess the perception of salty, sweet, and citric tastes in toothless complete denture wearers. The hypothesis is that their perception of these tastes is decreased in comparison with toothed individuals.
METHODS
This investigation complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, under number 2.846.389 and CAAE number 606.11716.8.0000.5440. All research participants signed an informed consent form.
This cross-sectional study, conducted between 2019 and 2021, had a convenience sample of 31 wearers (experimental group) of removable bimaxillary complete dentures, whose base and teeth were made of acrylic resin. Participants should have worn them for at least 3 months and at most 5 years, and the dentures should be in good condition and have an adequate maxillomandibular relationship. The control group had 26 healthy people with at least 24 teeth.
Volunteers had no oral diseases, their teeth or dentures were in good condition, they had no systemic diseases and were cognitively able to assess the tastes in the examination. Individuals with mucosal lesions, fractured or worn teeth, and incapable of assessing the tastes were excluded.
Taste sensitivity was assessed with filter paper strips soaked in liquids with salty, sweet, and citric tastes, placed over the participants’ tongue dorsum. The filter paper strips (JProlab - 40 x 40 mm, 80 g) were 8 cm long, and their tips measured 2 x 1 cm (Figure 1). Each participant was assessed with six strips soaked in liquids with the said tastes, twice each and in a random order. Those who wore dentures were wearing them during the assessment. The volunteers did not know the sequence of the tastes with which they were being tested.
The tastes were obtained by adding 9 g of sucrose to 10 mL of water; 9 g of sodium chloride to 10 mL of water; and 9 g of lime juice (juice powder manufactured by Clight) to 10 mL of water. After at least 5 seconds and at most 20 seconds holding in their mouths the strips that had been soaked in each of these tastes, volunteers indicated which taste they perceived in each test, while the examiner took notes on whether the identification was right or wrong. After each stimulation with a given taste, participants drank 10 mL of water for oral cleaning.
Before beginning the assessment, participants were shown images corresponding to each taste (to the citric taste, an image of a lime cut in half; to the sweet taste, a drawing of a sugar bowl; and to the salty taste, a drawing of a salt jar) to ensure they understood to what each taste referred and provided answers accordingly.
Differences between percentage rates of rightly and wrongly recognized tastes were assessed with a binomial regression model with an identity link function and comparisons adjusted for age20. Analyses were performed in SAS software 9.4.
RESULTS
The characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. Denture wearers had lower educational attainments and were older (65±10 years) than control individuals (59±9 years). Participants from both groups reported food restrictions, with no difference in proportion (p > 0.05).
The percentage rate of errors was similar between the control (9.6±13.5%) and experimental groups (10.5±15.5%) (p = 0.80). The proportion of correct taste identifications was not different between the two groups (Table 2, p > 0.05).
The distribution of participants who did not recognize the taste in either test, in one test, or recognized it in both tests was not different between the two groups (Table 3, p > 0.05).
DISCUSSION
In the group assessed in this study, no difference was found in the frequency of sweet, salty, and citric taste perception between toothless complete denture wearers and toothed individuals. Differences in mean age and educational attainment between denture wearers and non-wearers did not lead to differences in the assessment of taste perception.
The dentures worn by toothless individuals were made of acrylic resin, which is considered to hinder sensitivity12, though it was not confirmed in this investigation.
Blocking oral sensitivity with anesthesia changes swallowing, which demonstrates the importance of this perception21. It takes place as chemical substances in foods stimulate taste buds, triggering a nervous impulse, particularly on the tongue3. The perception mechanism is different for each of the tastes that were assessed 3.
This study’s hypothesis is justified by the lack of proper contact between tested substances and the receptors due to the dentures, hindering their identification. The results indicate that this hypothesis is not true. No difference in the frequency of taste recognition was found between denture wearers and non-wearers.
Previous studies indicate that another result is possible. The perception of sweet and sour tastes while wearing dentures has been described as weaker12, and that of bitter tastes, as particularly difficult13,14. The possibility of perceiving tastes in ingested foods (even if not at the same intensity as before beginning to wear dentures) is important for the procedure to actually improve toothless people’s quality of life, without interfering with the perception of food characteristics. Other investigations found no change in taste perception10,11, which may be due to the stimuli they used, the intensity of the stimuli (substance concentration), the form of assessment, or differences in dentures. The study did not assess the intensity of the perception which, though present, may have been weaker.
Taste perception in the tests used in this study was not always present in all individuals. Only the salty taste was recognized in both tests by all control individuals. Overall, tastes were correctly recognized in 80% to 90% of the tests, which is quite similar to the result found in the same population and described in a previous study22. Control individuals did not recognize correctly in 10% of the tests.
The method used is an alternative to assess taste perception13. However, other methods may have greater sensitivity and specificity for this assessment14,23.
This investigation has limitations. Three tastes were assessed, which is enough to demonstrate the lack of differences between complete denture wearers and toothed individuals. The group of denture wearers was a little older than the control group, which might have led to differences in the results14 - however, it did not happen, perhaps because the age difference was small. The educational attainment might also have interfered, expecting that those with more years of school attendance would be better able to identify tastes - which was not found in this investigation. Moreover, using stimuli in different concentrations may demonstrate differences between denture wearers and non-wearers.
CONCLUSION
No difference in salty, sweet, and citric taste perception frequency was found between acrylic resin complete denture wearers and toothed individuals.
REFERENCES
-
1 Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Brasseur JG et al. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1990;258(5):G675-81. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1990.258.5.G675 PMID:2333995.
» https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1990.258.5.G675 -
2 Steele CM, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Barbon CAE, Guida BT, Namasivayam-MacDonald AM, Nascimento WV et al. Reference values for healthy swallowing across the range from thin to extremely thick liquids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62(5):1338-63. https://doi.org/19.1944/2019_JSLHR-s-18-0448
» https://doi.org/19.1944/2019_JSLHR-s-18-0448 -
3 Costa MMB. Neural control of swallowing. Arq Gastroenterol. 2018;55(Suppl 1):61-75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-45
» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-45 -
4 Miller AJ. The neurobiology of swallowing and dysphagia. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(2):77-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.12 PMID:18646019.
» https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.12 -
5 Lang IM. Brain stem control of the phases of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2009;24(3):333-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9211-6
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9211-6 -
6 Steele CM, Miller AJ. Sensory input pathways and mechanisms in swallowing: a review. Dysphagia. 2010;25(4):323-33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9301-5
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9301-5 -
7 Ertekin C, Kiylioglu S, Keskin A, Aydogdu I. Effect of mucosal anaesthesia on oral swallowing. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000;12(6):567-72. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2982.2000.00232.x PMID:11123712.
» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2982.2000.00232.x -
8 Teismann IK, Steinstraeter O, Stoeckigt K, Suntrup S, Wollbrink A, Pantev C et al. Functional oropharyngeal sensory disruption interferes with the cortical control of swallowing. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-62 PMID:17678546.
» https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-62 -
9 Zhang L, Shimada A, Kusunoki T, Inoue T, Kawamoto A, Takahashi K. Effect of ageing and tooth loss on sensory function of alveolar mucosa. J Oral Rehabil. 2022;49(4):391-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13310 PMID:35119689.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13310 -
10 Ghaffari T, Rad FH, Kahnamoee SM. Evaluation of the effect of upper complete denture on gustatory and olfactory senses. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect. 2009;3(4):132-5. https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.032 PMID:23230501. PMCID:PMC3463099.
» https://doi.org/10.5681/joddd.2009.032 -
11 Tango RN, Arata A, Borges ALS, Costa AKF, Pereira LJ, Kaminagakura E. The role of new removable complete dentures in stimulated salivary flow and taste perception. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(4):335-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr12507 PMID:27434551.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr12507 - 12 Juzikis E, Klimenko J, Zilinskas J, Ivanauskiene E. The effect of new acrylic full removable dentures on food taste. Stomatologija. 2021;23(2):48-50. PMID:34528908.
- 13 Silva ROC, Lacerda WF, Henn IW, Chaiben CL, Machado MAN, Lima AAS. Relationship between taste perception and use of upper complete dentures. Spec Care Dentist. 2021;41(2):244-50. PMID:33400287.
-
14 Alia S, Aquilanti L, Pugnaloni S, Di Paolo A, Rappelli G, Vignini A. The influence of age and oral health on taste perception in older adults: a case-control study. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):4166. https://doi.org/103390/nu13114166 PMID:34836421.
» https://doi.org/103390/nu13114166 -
15 Costa MBB, Santana E, Almeida J. Oral taste recognition in health volunteers. Arq Gastroenterol. 2010; 47(2):152-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032010000200007 PMID:20721459.
» https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032010000200007 - 16 Camacho DP, Svidzinski TIE, Furlaneto MC, Lopes MB, Corrêa GO. Resínas acrílicas de uso odontológico à base de polimetilmetacrilato. Braz J Surg Clin Res. 2014;6(3):63-72.
-
17 Yamamoto H, Furuya J, Yamada Y, Kondo H. Impacts of wearing complete dentures on bolus transport during feeding in elderly edentulous. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(12):923-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12/07 PMDI:24237359.
» https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12/07 -
18 Onodera S, Furuya J, Yamamoto H, Tamada Y, Kondo H. Effects of wearing and removing dentures on oropharyngeal motility during swallowing. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(11):847-54. https://doi.org/101111/joor.12437 PMDI:27611827.
» https://doi.org/101111/joor.12437 -
19 Teisman IK, Steinstraeder O, Stoeckigt K, Suntrup S, Wollbrink A, Pantev C et al. Functional oropharyngeal sensory disruption interferes with the cortical control of swallowing. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-62
» https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-8-62 - 20 McCullagh P, Nelder JA. Generalized linear models. 1989. Second Edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
-
21 Chee C, Arshad S, Sing S, Misty S, Hamdy S. The influence of chemical gustatory stimuli and oral anaesthesia on healthy human pharyngeal swallowing. Chem Senses. 2005;30(5):393-400. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bji034 PMID:15829608.
» https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bji034 - 22 Alves LMT, Dantas RO. Percepção de sabores em pessoas normais. GED Gastroenterol Endosc Dig. 2014;33(3):102-5. ID: lil-763835.
-
23 Sousa FA, Machado AS, Costa JC, Pinto NA, Coutinho MB, Almeida e Sousa C et al. Taste assessment protocol: a new simple way of testing taste. Eur J Rhinol Allergy. 2022;5(2):40-4. https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2022.22011
» https://doi.org/10.5152/ejra.2022.22011
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
13 Oct 2023 -
Date of issue
2023
History
-
Received
05 May 2023 -
Accepted
07 Aug 2023