Open-access Customer Compliance: an analysis of publications and a research agenda proposal

Customer Compliance: uma análise das publicações e proposição de uma agenda de pesquisa

ABSTRACT

Purpose  In addition to the renowned Customer Centricity Strategy, this article aims to analyze and understand the theme of Customer Compliance as another relationship strategy with the market in the context of contemporary marketing management. Additionally, it proposes a research agenda to drive the application and comprehension of this theme in society.

Design/methodology/approach  Bibliometric analysis and Systematic Literature Review using the Scopus and Web of Science databases.

Findings  The following results were obtained: (a) New business models, especially those involving e-commerce, seek to enhance and expand the adoption of customer compliance in their processes, (b) customer compliance is a topic that is being increasingly used in marketing and, consequently, is attracting more attention from academics for knowledge production about it, (c) customer compliance is a theme with strong interaction with the consumer behavior area, especially in the service sector, promoting value co-creation with companies through cost reduction sharing due to adherence to previously established processes.

Originality/value  This study presents a comprehensive analysis of customer compliance, outlining its definitions and key attributes. It also synthesizes theoretical and practical insights from relevant articles and explores three theoretical frameworks related to customer satisfaction, consumer-employee relationships, and customer behavior, along with research methodologies employed.

Customer compliance; Customer conformity; Customer centricity; Contemporary management

RESUMO

Objetivo  Complementarmente à reputada estratégia de centralidade no cliente (Customer Centricity), este artigo tem por objetivo analisar e compreender a temática de Customer Compliance que se apresenta como outra estratégia de relacionamento com o mercado no contexto da gestão contemporânea de marketing. Além disso, propõe-se uma agenda de pesquisa para impulsionar a aplicação e compreensão desse tema na sociedade.

Design/ Metodologia/ Abordagem  Análise bibliométrica e Revisão Sistemática da Literatura utilizando-se da base de dados Scopus e Web of Science.

Resultados  A partir da análise, tem-se como resultado: (a) novos modelos de negócios, especialmente aqueles envolvendo e-commerce, buscam aprimorar e expandir a adoção de customer compliance em seus processos, (b) customer compliance é um tema que está sendo cada vez mais utilizado em marketing e, consequentemente, está atraindo mais atenção dos acadêmicos para a produção de conhecimento sobre ele, (c) customer compliance é um tema com forte interação com a área de comportamento do consumidor, especialmente no setor de serviços, promovendo a co-criação de valor com as empresas por meio do compartilhamento da redução de custos devido à adesão a processos previamente estabelecidos.

Originalidade/ valor  Com base em uma revisão bibliográfica rigorosa, este estudo apresenta uma análise abrangente sobre customer compliance, delineando suas definições e atributos-chave. Também sintetiza insights teóricos e práticos de artigos relevantes e explora três estruturas teóricas relacionadas à satisfação do cliente, relacionamentos entre clientes e funcionários, e comportamento do cliente, juntamente com as metodologias de pesquisa empregadas.

Customer compliance; Conformidade do cliente; Customer centricity; Gestão contemporânea

1 Introduction

Since the marketing paradigm evolved from an initial product-focused perspective, later incorporating the sales perspective, and more recently expanding to the customer perspective, mainly through the concept of market orientation, the relationships that an organization establishes with its market, or more specifically with its customers, have gained relevance in both academic and business environments (Kasabov & Warlow, 2009, 2010).

The importance of the organization being market-oriented to generate superior results compared to the average of its sector is not in question, since it is a consensus both in academia and in the corporate environment (Jaworski & Kohli, 2017; Ozkaya, Droge, Hult, Calantone, & Ozkaya, 2015). As an advance of the Market Orientation theory, Customer Centricity is a theory that has been gaining importance among companies for its validity in understanding consumer expectations, as well as its ability to exceed them (Vlašić & Tutek, 2017). Since then, several authors have been debating its applications (Kasabov, 2016; Vlašić & Tutek, 2017; Ulaga, 2018; Shah, Rust, Parasuraman, Staelin, & Day, 2006; Reilly, 2018; Frankenberger, Weiblen, & Gassmann, 2013; Damázio, Soares, Shigaki, Gonçalves, & Mesquita, 2020).

However, a company that does not adopt customer centrality as a marketing strategy does not necessarily mean it is not market-oriented or customer-focused (Jaworski & Kohli, 2017; Teece, 2010; Norton & Naylor, 2009). It is possible to focus on the customer and make them satisfied without necessarily having to make processes more flexible (Park & Nite, 2023) to meet specific demands or even enable customer engagement platforms for co-creation and co-production processes. At this point, the concept of Customer Compliance emerges.

The theory of Customer Compliance aims to demonstrate that the consumer or customer participates in the processes of interaction and exchange with the company based on pre-established agreements between stakeholders, without exceeding expectations (Kasabov & Warlow, 2010; Jaworski & Kohli, 2017; Andespa, Yeni, Fernando & Sari, 2024). From the point of view of coherence and strategic consistency, this dynamic can be intricate for organizations that operate with the logic of operational excellence. Therefore, just as has been happening with the Customer Centricity theory, in Customer Compliance there are authors who, in an attempt to better understand this new theme, have developed their models (Dellande, Gilly, & Graham, 2004; Kasabov & Warlow, 2010; Lin & Hsieh, 2011; Teng, Zhang, Li, & Chen, 2020; Jiang, Xu, Cui, Zhang, & Yanf, 2019; Li, Zhang, Wang, & Guo, 2018).

Kasabov and Warlon (2010) observed that three tests were necessary for the proposed theoretical model to yield good results regarding the studied theory: (a) redundancy test, which requires a return to the literature to better understand it, (b) comprehension test, with a systematic and illustrative investigation, and (c) empirical applicability test, for discussion of the results found. At this point, the goal that is presented, unprecedented in the field of Administration in this article, is to analyze and understand the evolution of Customer Compliance theory in the literature and to document its trends. This objective will meet the first two requirements of Kasabov and Warlon (2010).

In addition to the renowned Customer Centricity Strategy, this article aims to analyze and understand the theme of Customer Compliance as another relationship strategy (Lin & Hsieh, 2011) with the market in the context of contemporary marketing management (Tang, Guo & Gruen, 2024). The research problem is as follows: how has the topic of customer compliance evolved in marketing literature?

Furthermore, this article has four specific objectives (a) to identify the growth of publications and concentration areas, (b) to identify authors who emerge as thought leaders in the literature, (c) to analyze the intellectual structure of the knowledge base on Customer Compliance, (d) to identify and analyze research topics that have received greater attention from the literature, based on the development of a research agenda.

The article is organized in the same sequence as the specific objectives presented. As this is a bibliometric analysis carried out concomitantly with the Systematic Literature Review, the method was discussed after this introduction, and the theory and results on Customer Compliance were presented throughout the study.

2 Method

This study was conducted based on the Scopus database, which has a greater number of journals compared to the Web of Science (Paul & Criado, 2020) and the Web of Science database for the quality and relevance of research sources. Both bases are important and valuable for the field of knowledge in Administration. For the research conducted in April 2024, the terms “Customer Compliance” and “Consumer Compliance” were used. The preliminary result is shown in the following table (Table 1). Out of the 31 articles, 17 were found in both databases and 14 were found only in Scopus. Regarding the Keywords, 17 articles were found with “Customer Compliance”, 13 with “Consumer Compliance” and 1 with both keywords.

Table 1
– Procedures, filters and paper selection

There are different review methods in current literature such as bibliometric analysis, meta-analysis and systematic literature review (Donthu, Kumar, Mukherjee, Pandey & Lim, 2021). In this article, we utilized bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Donthu et al. (2021) show that there are two techniques for bibliometric analysis: performance analysis and science mapping. In the next two sections the performance analysis will be presented followed by the science mapping (5. Customer Compliance Intellectual structure). The purpose of the first analysis was to present publication and Citation metrics, while the second one demonstrates the relationship among publications and themes, with a co-word and co-citation analysis (Donthu et al., 2021).

The bibliometric analysis was conducted in two ways: (a) within the Scopus and Web of Science database, using the “analyze results” feature, and (b) using the VOSviewer software, which, as stated on its official website, is a “tool for constructing and visualizing bibliometric networks” (VOSviewer, 2021). In the network analysis, the advanced feature of the thesaurus tool was used to optimize the cluster network and avoid synonymous terms.

From this, the systematic literature review was initiated using the PRISMA protocol. This protocol is widely used in systematic reviews due to its numerous advantages. Amongs these, the ability to determine which articles will be included or excluded from the study stands out, as well as the facilitation of understanding the literature through rigorous review and analysis process (Andespa, Yeni, Fernando, & Sari, 2024).

Thus, the titles of the 108 articles obtained in the initial search were read and 74 selected for the next phase. After reading the abstracts, 36 articles were excluded for not meeting the selection and evaluation criteria, and 4 for being book chapters, which did not correspond to the document source criteria established, both described in Table 1. Thus, 34 articles were read in full. Also, 3 articles were excluded from the final sample for not corresponding to the pre-established selection and evaluation criteria.

The Content Analysis was conducted, following the steps suggested by Bardin (2011): (a) pre-analysis, with the organization of the material and elaboration of the analysis plan, (b) material exploration, consisting of a complete reading of the articles, breaking them down into codes and categories, (c) results from treatment, with evidence for the topics studied, with in-depth analysis and association between codes and categories, and (d) interpretation of results for theoretical purposes and proposition of a research agenda. The results were presented in the following sections.

3 Panorama and Growth of publications in Customer Compliance

The first article that mentioned the Customer Compliance theory was published in 1979 in the Journal of Psychology, entitled Influence of low-balling on buyers’ compliance and authored by Motes and Woodside (1979). In the following decade, Motes, Brown, Ezell, and Hudson (1986) published a revised version of this article in the Psychology & Marketing Journal. In the first article, the authors proposed the following research question: “Does low-balling increase Customer Compliance in retail settings?” (p. 219). In the second article, the question was complemented: “If it does work, potentially how serious a problem is low-balling to the consumer?” (p. 79).

In both articles, the authors conducted a real experiment on the sale of nail polish via low-balling, which is when “making an offer more than possible to deliver and revoking a central part of the offer after the target subject (e.g., buyer) accepts is commonly referred to as a low-ball” (Motes & Woodside, 1979, p. 219). With a sample of 80 and 160 people, respectively, the authors did not confirm that the technique produces a significant effect on Customer Compliance.

Despite these findings, these two studies were the first to be published on the subject, which was researched again only in 2000 (McCarthy & Fram, 2000). Since then, other articles have been found, indicating a growth in the number of publications. The most recent publications is by Andespa et al. (2024) and Tang, Guo e Gruen (2024). Figure 1 illustrates the growth of publications in Customer Compliance.

Figure 1
– Growth of publications in Customer Compliance

Regarding the concentration area of the articles, most of them are in the Business Administration field. The article by Bharti, Gratz and Fitzgerald (2022), Hadi and Valenzuela (2021), Wu and Cutright (2018), Hoeppner (2014) and Kronrod, Grinstein ad Wathieu (2012a,b) also belongs to the Economic field. The article by Motes et al. (1986) and Motes and Woodside (1979) also belongs to the Psychology field. While the articles by Henley and Fu (2019) and Webb and Byrd-Bredbenner (2015) belong to Medicine and Agriculture.

Regarding the countries of origin, 15were identified. From the analysis carried out in VOSviewer, there is a partnership relationship between China and Hong Kong, and between China and Finland. The United States of America (USA) has the largest number of articles published and, consequently, of citations. The USA presented a partnership with United Kingdom, Denmark, Canada and Israel that appear on the top of those that produce the most regarding papers in Customer and Consumer Compliance.

Is important to mention that no country from Latin America has published the Customer Compliance theme. This represents an opportunity for research considering factors that influence consumer behavior, such as culture, social, personal, financial, and psychological factors.

4 Most recurrent authors and relevant works

Stephanie Dellande has the largest number of publications about Customer and Consumer Compliance (Dellande & Saporoschenko, 2004; Dellande & Nyer, 2013, 20, 2007; Dellande et al., 2004; Dellande & Saporoschenko, 2004). Her article titled “Gaining Compliance and losing weight: The role of the service provider in health care services” is also the most cited in the Scopus database, with 222 mentions (Dellande et al., 2004).

Figure 2
– Most recurrent authors

Besides the most recurrent authors, the list of the six most cited articles is formed by Kronrod et al. (2012b) with 272 citations, followed by Dellande et al. (2004), as mentioned with 222 citations, Guo, Arnould, Gruen and Tang (2013) with 107 citations, and Kronrod et al. (2012a) with 87 citations. Lin and Hsieh (2011) and Breen (2006) appear in the ranking with 44 citations each.

Kronrod et al. (2012b) indicated that assertive language in social communication can be effective depending on the importance of the issue to the consumer. Considering that Costumer Compliance can also be understood as the degree to which consumers comply with requests or follow instructions from the organization, the authors highlight the concept of perceived importance as a critical moderator that can significantly influence consumer behavior.

Dellande et al. (2004) proposed a model in healthcare services, where Customer Compliance is a necessary condition for obtaining successful results by the company. The proposed model is composed of three parts: (a) characteristics of the service provider, explained by expertise, demographic homogeneity, and attitudinal homogeneity, (b) consumer attributes, explained by the clarity of the consumer’s role, consumer ability, consumer motivation, (c) consumer outcomes, explained by how Customer Compliance affects satisfaction and the organization’s service goal.

Guo et al. (2013) investigated the process of organizational socialization of the customer regarding personal health issues, developing and testing a model based on consumer socialization and co-prodution behavior. The research, conducted with 364 clients, indicated that compliance behavior was the most beneficial for both customer well-being and the satisfaction index with the organization.

Kronrod et al. (2012a) continued the study by examining the persuasiveness of assertive language, this time focusing on Nike’s slogan “Just do it”. They used the hedonic and utilitarian consumption theory and “specifically proposed that hedonic products are likely to prompt a positive mood, wich results in the expectation for, and acceptane of, a more direct and assertive communication style” (p. 58).

Lin and Hsieh (2011) developed a model to fill a research gap to explore the antecedents and consequences of Customer Compliance for services that require a high level of contact, that is when the company offers a range of support to its consumer to build mutual social benefits. The developed model is constituted of 11 hypotheses that permeate its 7 variables (provider’s social skills, provider’s customer orientation, provider’s expertise, friendly services, Customer Compliance (which interacts with all other variables), satisfaction, and anticipation of future interaction). All hypotheses were supported by the study. In this article, the concept of Customer Compliance is consistent with Dellande and Nyer (2013), regarding conformity, adaptation, and rules that consumers must follow.

Finally, Breen (2006) investigated the financial and operational impact of customer non-compliance on reverse logistics. Despite not proposing a model, the qualitative study focuses on two fronts, which are listed as originality by the author: Business-to-Business (B2B) and Business-to-Consumer (B2C). The results indicate that the effectiveness of the reverse logistics system can be undermined by a lack of Customer Compliance, with losses of up to £140 million for the company, indicating greater implications for B2B relationships when compared to B2C.

5 Customer Compliance Intellectual structure

Co-word analysis allows the identification of terms in the given database that have occurred with higher frequency and consequently received more attention in the literature. Van Eck and Waltman (2014) clarify that the number of co-occurrences of two terms is the number of publications in which the two terms occur together in the title, abstract, or keyword list. Therefore, the keyword network was developed by co-word analysis using VOSviewer software and resulted in 5 clusters, named: Customer Compliance (blue cluster), Service (red cluster), Customer Behavior (green cluster), Relationship (yellow cluster), Customer Centricity (purple cluster) as illustrated in Figure 3. Keywords that are currently the most searched currently, as seen through a overlay visualization, are, motivation (red cluster), co-creation and conflict (blue cluster) which could potentially serve as hot topics for discussion on Customer Compliance.

Figure 3
– Keyword network

Figure 3 reveals that the cluster ‘Customer Compliance’ in blue, is related to the term’s conflict, co-creation and customer satisfaction. Jiang et al. (2019) article aimed to examine the impact of customer participation on behavior and satisfaction, using the stressor role as a moderator. The theoretical-empirical study conducted with 317 bank customers resulted in (a) increasing customer participation also increases the degree of inconsistency between expectations and perception of service offered, increasing ambiguity and conflict, (b) with increased ambiguity and conflict, there is an increase in customers’ behavioral and cognitive resistance to their participation in the process, reducing their participation in activities and Customer Compliance behavior, (c) if there is a reduction in Customer Compliance, coproduction efficiency will be impaired, (d) on the other hand, with all these results, there is a hypothesis (not confirmed) that an increase in co-creation activities engagement could increase customer satisfaction. The same authors (p. 699) define Customer Compliance as “the participating customers would strictly follow the role requirements and guidance from the service providers since the compliance behaviors are beneficial for goal achievement and desired outcomes.”

In addition, Jacob and Guéguen (2014) proposed to test the effect of compliments on customer acceptance of a waiter’s suggestion in a restaurant. They conducted a causal experimental study with 224 customers divided into three groups: (a) compliment and suggestion, (b) suggestion only, and (c) control group. As a conclusion, the authors found that when the customer receives a suggestion and compliment, there was an increase in dessert orders without them being previously offered to the customers.

The cluster Customer Behavior, in green, is related to co-production, information dissemination and decision making. Bharti et al. (2022) developed a compliance model focused on consumer well-being in the contexto of Covid-19 from the theoretical standpoint of consumer perception, complacency, and perceived ethically, starting from a conservative political ideology. “Communications that focus on choice (as opposed to restricted freedom), actions that reduce complacency, and messages that increase ethical sensitivity (without labeling the issue as one focused on ethics) may be effective” (Bharti et al., 2022, p.135). In the same way, Hadi and Valenzuela (2019) sought to investigate the experience individuals have with incidental device-delivered haptic feedback and noted that When it was accompanied by messages its possible to improve consumer performance.

Dellande and Nyer (2007, p. 664) aimed to “shed greater light on the factors that influence consumer compliance behavior” through an experiment with 96 subjects. As a result, the authors indicated that: (a) public commitment motivates individuals to engage in sustained compliance behavior, while the degree of compliance varies with the degree of publicity with which the commitment is declared, (b) actively participating in public commitment makes individuals evaluate the purpose of the act as being the most important, (c) susceptibility to normative influence is a moderator of the effect of public commitment on long-term conformity.

The service cluster is presented in red, with a direct relationship with customer behavior and customer compliance clusters. Li et al. (2018) address this point from the perspective of fuzzy requests, in a theoretical-empirical study with 309 consumers. The authors sought to identify the variables that influence Customer Compliance behavior, as follows: (a) the integration between the Theory of Planned Behavior with emotional response, and (b) evidence that expected technical quality, perceived reasonableness, perceived convenience, inertia, and negative emotion influence Customer Compliance.

An example of how these topics are interconnected is found in Tang et al. (2024) article. The authors developed a model of customer compliance with goal settings (motivation and customer compliance), goal achievement, and goal outcome (well-being and satisfaction). Furthermore, Wu an Cutright (2018) delved into the concepts of customer compliance and advertising, investigating how reminders of God affect participants, who associated God with unlimited support.

The customer centricity cluster, in purple, is exclusively associated with service, customer compliance, as well as with customer (dis)satisfaction. This topic is widely discussed by Kasabov and Warlow (2009, 2010). Kasabov and Warlow (2010) promoted a reflection on the change from the Customer Centricity model to the Customer Compliance Business Model (CCBM). The authors reaffirm the innovative aspect of the change, reinforce that the CCBM is not exclusively for digital businesses, and also suggest that the process is a primary item for understanding Customer Compliance.

Among these articles, only Kasabov and Warlow (2010) provided a clear path to understanding the concept of Customer Compliance, which is composed by: (a) process and interaction, with a high degree of control and standardization of interaction, self-help systems, and rigid rules to all complainants, (b) role of the consumer and employee, where employees are limited by the extensive use of online technology, as well as having control and discipline over script rules, (c) paths for the consumer to express dissatisfaction, based on previously used typologies and styles and, based on the individual action as an ineffective, (d) orientation towards long-term relationships, with financial predominance, without social and structural ties, without equity (value) in the relationship and service recovery paradox besides the questions about the relationship between satisfaction, purchase intention and profitability and, (e) market research and intelligence, in which it is assumed that complaints should be obtained in real-time, with the support of information technology tools, and with some use of the learning curve.

The relationship cluster, in yellow, is related to perceptions keyword. Teng et al. (2020) conducted a theoretical-empirical study with 45 interviews and 382 surveys with consumers, and two major contributions were identified: (a) organization employees should adopt communication approaches to meet customer requests, and (b) organization managers should train employees to improve the emotional well-being of customers. In the same way, Guo, Chen and Xu (2016) developed a model named consumer commitment model, with perceived alternatives, perceived organizational support, and consumers’ relationship investment as antecedentes, and intention to remain, compliance, individual iniciative, and civic virtue as consequents. “This study showed that relationship investments from both service organizations and consumers help forge consumers’ commitment to the service organization, which in turn promotes the consumer’s retention and coproduction behaviors” (Guo et al., 2016, p.385).

Albeit the term “Customer Compliance” has been recurrently employed in scholarly literature since the previous century, its conceptual elucidation has been notably absent (Table 2). Kasabov and Warlow (2010, p.701) initiated its definition by focusing on cost reduction for customers. Subsequently, Lin and Hsieh (2011, p.609), Guo et al. (2013, p.551), and Guo, Chen, and Xu (2016, p.383) provided further clarification, positing that Customer Compliance denotes the degree to which clients adhere to the instructions and counsel proffered by service providers, with the “compliance outcome” realized when clients adjust their behavior to align with the service process (Li et al., 2018, p.2). Recent scholarship (Jiang et al., 2019, p.5; Bharti et al., 2022, p.123; Tang et al., 2024, p.4) has reiterated this definition, emphasizing that Customer Compliance pertains to the expectation that clients comport themselves in accordance with the requirements and specifications stipulated by service providers.

Table 2
– Customer compliance conceptual

Additionally, Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of the 31 scientific articles that have been published addressing the theme of customer compliance. Each article is examined across various key dimensions, including authors, purpose, theoretical implications, and managerial and practical implications. This curated compilation encapsulates a wide variety of research endeavors, offering insights into the intricate dynamics between service providers and customers, with a particular focus on understanding compliance behaviours and enhancing customer satisfaction. By scrutinising the theoretical foundations and practical applications elucidated within these articles, stakeholders in both academia and industry can gain valuable insights to inform their decision-making processes and advance their understanding of customer-provider interactions in service encounters.

Table 3
– Comprehensive overview (Continued)

Regarding the references co-citation network used by the authors, out of 1.695 references cited, 38 were cited at least twice (Table 4). The table was divided into three groups, according to the result of the VOSviewer, characterizing the possible theoretical perspectives: (a) perspective 1, which deals with satisfaction and motivation, with specificities for service, customer focus and interpersonal relationship, (b) perspective 2, which deals with co-production and loyalty, shedding light on the influence of service provided by employees and an attempt to propose a value for actors involved, and (c) perspective 3, which contribute to our understanding of psychology, research methodologies and the dynamics of service delivery.

Table 4
– Co-citation networks and perspectives definition

6 Research Agenda

Out of the 31 publications analyzed in this article, 23 journals were identified, and only 8 published two articles: (a) Advances in Consumer Research (Norton & Naylor, 2009; Dellande & Nyer, 2007), (b) International Journal of Bank Marketing (Dellande & Saporoschenko, 2004; Jiang et al., 2019), (c) International Journal of Hospitality Management (Guéguen et al., 2011; Jacob & Guéguen, 2014), (d) Journal of Consumer Research (Hadi & Valenzuela, 2021; Kronrod et al., 2012b), (e) Journal of Marketing (Kronrod et al., 2012a; Dellande et al., 2004), (f) Journal of Service Theory and Practice (Park, Lee, & Nite, 2023; Davey et al., 2020), (g) Journal of Services Marketing (McCarthy & Fram, 2000; Li et al., 2018), and (h) Management Research Review (Dellande & Nyer, 2013; Breen, 2006). It should be noted that Breen’s article (2006) was published in Management Research News, which was later renamed Management Research Review.

The research agenda was developed through two sources of information: (a) analysis of the call for papers of all journals that were published on Customer or Consumer Compliance (Table 5) and (b) analysis of the future research directions suggested by the 17 publications (Table 6).

Table 5
– Calls for papers

Table 6
– Suggestions for future work

The calls for papers highlighted in Table 5, for the most part, present an agenda with significant adherence to the Customer Compliance theme in the Marketing field, although there is no direct citation of it. It is possible to verify that these calls for papers address marketing phenomena with an emphasis on (a) a new service delivery (Heinonen & Strandvik, 2021) considering the entire ecosystem, (b) restrictions imposed by the epidemiological context of COVID-19, mainly regarding diversity and social issues (Bharti et al., 2022; He & Harris, 2020), (c) digital technologies of industry 4.0 such as metaverse and artificial intelligence (Hadi & Valenzuela, 2021; Vlačić, Corbo, Csota, & Dabić, 2021; Kasabov & Warlow, 2010), (d) the new consumer behavior (Sheth, 2020), mainly related to engagement and adaptation, (e) financial impact (Andespa et al., 2024; Breen, 2006), (f) and service marketing for good (Hadi & Valenzuela, 2021; Davey et al., 2020; Henley & Fu, 2019).

This emphasis intertwines with the Customer Compliance theme by provoking a need for innovation in the consumer journey (Wang. Hon, Li, & Goa, 2020), due to the reconfiguration of demand. Therefore, it becomes necessary to create new value propositions (Kristensson, 2019) with a greater possibility of agreement from consumers and clients in the co-production service, as well as in accepting the limitations imposed by the algorithms adopted in machines and artificial intelligence during the use of services.

As a proposition for a research agenda, Table 6 was elaborated to present suggestions for future work indicated by the authors of the 31 analyzed articles.

The suggestions for future work presented in Table 6 reveal a series of other research opportunities. Conducting longitudinal studies (Dellande & Saporoschenki, 2004; Guo et al., 2013; Teng et al., 2020) is one of the most highlighted issues to ensure that the results are not considered isolated facts that only represent the specific moment (Kasabov & Warlow, 2009). Another noteworthy point is the recommendation to conduct Costumer Compliance studies in different sectors of the economy (Tang et al., 2024; Dellande & Nyer, 2013; Teng et al., 2020), which allows us to verify which companies or sectors fail to adopt Customer Compliance. Regarding the theory of Customer Compliance, Lin and Hsieh (2011) emphasize the need to explore the impact of its antecedents and consequences. In its organizational aspect, the theme still lacks studies on consumer behavior in long-term services (Dellande & Nyer, 2013), co-creation (Davey et al., 2020), religion (Wu & Cutright, 2018) social and situational factors (Li et al., 2018), the use of justice theory (McCarthy & Fram, 2000), and the role of public commitment (Dellande & Nyer, 2007).

7 Conclusion

This paper’s purpose, to analyze and understand the evolution of Customer Compliance in literature, and document and analyze research trends in this field of knowledge, was achieved. The study presented, in a detailed and unprecedented manner, a review of the Customer Compliance theme by identifying the number, growth, and geographical distribution of scientific production, as well as the authors who emerge as thought leaders in this area. Additionally, the study also included analyses of the intellectual structure base on Customer Compliance, the main journals publishing, and a research agenda.

The analyses developed to reveal that the theme is still incipient in the literature, with little academic production when compared to the Customer Centricity theme. However, interest in the theme has been growing since the beginning of the current century. It should also be noted that no articles from Latin American countries were identified, which represents an opportunity for discussion. The contributions of the analyzed articles indicate that Customer Compliance is strengthening as a necessary condition for companies to obtain successful results and that it presupposes a process with a high degree of control and standardization of interaction with customers, with rigid rules standardized for all stakeholders involved, while still focusing on the customer. This contributes to explaining that the concept of market orientation accommodates both perspectives: Customer Compliance, with standardized processes, and Customer Centricity, with more flexible processes.

This study presents one limitation regarding the use of only two databases. As a suggestion for future work, the current research agenda on themes related to Customer Compliance suggests that studies advance towards developing longitudinal studies and also analyzing ways to achieve Customer Compliance in different sectors, exploring more the relationship between the concepts of market orientation, Customer Centricity, and Customer Compliance.

References

  • Andespa, R., Yeni, Y. H., Fernando, Y., Sari, D. K. (2024). A systematic review of customer Sharia compliance behavior in Islamic banks: Determinants and behavioral intention. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(4), 1013-1034.
  • Auh, S., Bell, S.J., Mcleod, C.S., & Shih, E. (2007). Co-production and customer loyalty in financial services. Journal of Retailing 83 (3), 359-370
  • Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo São Paulo: Edições 70.
  • Bharti, V. P., Gratz, E. T., & Fitzgerald, M. P. (2022). "You can't make me do it!" A model of consumer compliance. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(1), 120-140.
  • Breen L. (2006). Give me back my empties or else! A preliminary analysis of customer compliance in reverse logistics practices (UK). Management Research News, 29 (9), 532551. doi: 10.1108/01409170610708989
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610708989
  • Damázio, L., Soares, J., Shigaki, H., Gonçalves, C., Mesquita, J. (2020). Customer centricity: a bibliometric analysis of academic production. Revista de Administração da UFSM, 13, 1510-1529. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465961375
    » https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465961375
  • Davey, J., Herbst, J., Johns, R., Parkinson, J., Russell-Bennett, R., & Zainuddin, N. (2020). The role of health locus of control in value co-creation for standardized screening services. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30 (1), 31-55.
  • Dellande S., Gilly, M. C., Graham J. L. (2004). Gaining compliance and losing weight: The role of the service provider in health care services. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 279-290.
  • Dellande S., & Nyer P. (2007). Using a public commitment to gain customer compliance. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 249-255.
  • Dellande S., & Nyer P. (2013). Self-regulatory focus: The impact on long-term consumer compliance behavior. Management Research Review, 36 (7).
  • Dellande S., & Saporoschenko A. (2004). Factors in gaining compliance toward an acceptable level of personal unsecured debt. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 22 (4), 279290. doi: 10.1108/02652320410542554
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320410542554
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  • Frankenberger, K., Weiblen, T., Gassmann, O. (2013). Network configuration, customer centricity, and performance of open business models: A solution provider perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(5), 671–682. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.004
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.004
  • Guéguen N., Jacob C., Meineri S. (2011). Effects of the Door-in-the-Face Technique on restaurant customers’ Behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(3), 759-761. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.12.010
  • Guenzi, P., Pelloni, O. (2004). The impact of interpersonal relationships on customer satisfaction and loyalty to the service provider. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 15(4), 365-384. doi: 10.1108/09564230410552059
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230410552059
  • Guo, L., Arnould, E. J., Gruen, T. W., & Tang, C. (2013). Socializing to co-produce: Pathways to consumers' financial well-being. Journal of Service Research, 16(4), 549-563.
  • Guo, L., Chen, C., Xu, H. (2016). Forging relationships to coproduce: A Consumer Commitment Model in an extended service encounter. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 31, 380-388.
  • Hadi, R., & Valenzuela, A. (2021). Good vibrations: Consumer responses to technology-mediated haptic feedback. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 256-271.
  • He, H., & Harris, L. (2020). The Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing Philosophy. Journal of Business Research doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.030
  • Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T. (2021). Reframing service innovation: COVID-19 as a catalyst for imposed service innovation. Journal of Service Management, 32(1), 101-112. doi: 10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0161
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0161
  • Henley, S. C., & Fu, J. (2019). Developing and testing consumer educational material at farmers' markets. Food Protection Trends, 39(2), 162-175.
  • Hoeppner, S. (2014). The unintended consequence of doorstep consumer protection: Surprise, reciprocation, and consistency. European Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2), 247-276.
  • Jacob, C., & Guéguen, N. (2014). The effect of compliments on customers' compliance with a food server's suggestion. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 40, 59-61, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.010
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2014.03.010
  • Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (2017). Conducting field-based discovery-oriented research: lessons from our market orientation research experience. AMS Review, 7 (1), 4-12. doi: 10.1007/s13162-017-0088-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-017-0088-5
  • Jiang, Y., Xu, L., Cui, N., Zhang, H., & Yang, Z. (2019). How does customer participation in service influence customer satisfaction? The mediating effects of role stressors. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37 (3), 1-21, doi: 10.1108/IJBM12-2017-0261
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM12-2017-0261
  • Kasabov, E. (2016). Theorizing practices to deliberately or accidentally control customers. European Journal of Marketing, 50 (7/8), 1493-1520. doi: 10.1108/EJM-102014-0618
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-102014-0618
  • Kasabov, E, & Warlow, A. J. (2009). Automated marketing and the growth of 'customer compliance'businesses. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 11, 30-50. doi: 10.1057/dddmp.2009.19
    » https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2009.19
  • Kasabov, E., & Warlow, A. J. (2010). Towards a new model of "customer compliance" service provision. European Journal of Marketing, 44 (6), 700-729, doi: 10.1108/03090561011032685
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011032685
  • Kristensson, P. (2019). Future service technologies and value creation. Journal of Services Marketing, 33 (4), 502-506. doi: 10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0031
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2019-0031
  • Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., Wathieu, L. (2012a). Enjoy! Hedonic consumption and compliance with assertive messages. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 51-61.
  • Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012b). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95-102.
  • Li, X., Zhang, S., Wang, C., & Guo, X. (2018). Understanding customer's compliance behaviour to frontline employees' fuzzy requests. Journal of Services Marketing, 37 (3), 1-13, doi: 10.1108/JSM-03-2016-0122
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2016-0122
  • Lin, J-S C., & Hsieh, C-C. (2011). Modeling service friendship and customer compliance in high-contact service relationships. Journal of Service Management, 22 (5), 607-631, doi: 10.1108/09564231111174979
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111174979
  • McCarthy M.S., & Fram E.H. (2000). An exploratory investigation of customer penalties: assessment of efficacy, consequences, and fairness perceptions. Journal of Services Marketing, 14 (6), 479-501, doi: 10.1108/08876040010347606
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040010347606
  • Motes W. H., & Woodside A. G. (1979). Does lowballing increase customer compliance in retail settings? Journal of Psychology, 101 (2), 219-221, doi: 10.1080/00223980.1979.9915074
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1979.9915074
  • Motes W. H., Brown R. E., Ezell H. F., & Hudson G. I. (1986). The influence of 'low-balling' on buyers' compliance: Revisited. Psychology & Marketing, 3 (2), 80-86, doi: 10.1002/mar.4220030204
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220030204
  • Norton, D. A., & Naylor, R. W. (2009). Seeing ourselves in others: Consumer compliance with recommendations made by ambiguous agents. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 1053-1054.
  • Ozkaya, H. E., Droge, C., Hult, G. T. M., Calantone, R., & Ozkaya, E. (2015). Market orientation, knowledge competence, and innovation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32 (3), 309-318.
  • Park S., Lee H.-W., & Nite C. (2023). When does highlighting effort or talent in fitness service providers' performance lead to customer compliance? The role of customers' implicit mindset. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 33 (1). doi: 10.1108/JSTP-03-2022-0075
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-03-2022-0075
  • Paul, J., Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4). doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  • Reilly, P. (2018). Building customer centricity in the hospitality sector: the role of talent management. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 10 (1), 42-56. doi: 10.1108/WHATT-10-2017-0068
    » https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-10-2017-0068
  • Shah, D., Rust, R. T., Parasuraman, A., Staelin, R., & Day, G. S. (2006). The Path to Customer Centricity. Journal of Service Research, 9 (2), 113-124. doi: 10.1177/1094670506294666
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670506294666
  • Sheth J. (2020) Impact of Covid-19 on Consumer Behavior: Will the Old Habits Return or Die? Journal of Business Research, 117 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.059
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.059
  • Tang, C., Guo, L., & Gruen, T. (2024). A goal-driven framework for compliance-dependent services: Pathways to customer satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Business Research, 177.
  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. Doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003
  • Teng, T., Zhang, S., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2020). Customer Compliance with employee fuzzy requests in service encounter: a self-determination theory perspective. Service Business, 14 (2), 1-24. doi: 10.1007/s11628-020-00414-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00414-9
  • Ulaga, W. (2018). The journey towards customer centricity and service growth in B2B: a commentary and research directions. AMS Review, 8 (1-2), 80-83. doi: 10.1007/s13162-018-0119-x
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0119-x
  • Van Eck, N.J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing Bibliometric Networks. In: Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., Wolfram, D. (eds) Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer, Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
  • Vlačić B., Corbo L., Costa e Silva S., Dabić M. (2021). The evolving role of artificial intelligence in marketing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 128, 187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.055.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.055
  • Vlašić, G., Tutek, E. (2017). Drivers of Customer Centricity: Role of Environmental-level, Organization-level and Department-level Variables. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 20(2), 1–10. doi: 10.1515/zireb-2017-0013
    » https://doi.org/10.1515/zireb-2017-0013
  • VOSviewer (2021). Welcome to VOSviewer Recuperado de: https://www.vosviewer.com/
    » https://www.vosviewer.com/
  • Wang Y., Hong A., Li X., Gao J. (2020). Marketing innovations during a global crisis: A study of China firms’ response to COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, 116 doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.029
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.029
  • Webb, D., & Byrd-Bredbenner, C. (2015). Overcoming consumer inertia to dietary guidance. Advances in Nutrition, 6(4), 391-396.
  • Wu, E. C., & Cutright, K. M. (2018). In God's hands: How reminders of God dampen the effectiveness of fear appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 119-131.
  • Copyrights:
    Authors of articles published by ReA/UFSM retain the copyright of their works.
  • Plagiarism Check:
    The ReA/UFSM maintains the practice of submitting all documents approved for publication to the plagiarism check, using specific tools, e.g.: Turnitin.

Edited by

  • Edited by:
    Jordana Marques Kneipp

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    10 Jan 2025
  • Date of issue
    Nov 2024

History

  • Received
    26 Apr 2023
  • Accepted
    20 July 2024
  • Published
    29 Oct 2024
location_on
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Centro de Ciências Sociais e Humanas (CCSH), Avenida Roraima nº 1000, Prédio 74C, Sala 4210 - Cidade Universitária, CEP: 97105-900, Tel: +55 (55) 3220-9242 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: rea@ufsm.br
rss_feed Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
Acessibilidade / Reportar erro