Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Sarcocystis spp in tissues of Sus scrofa slaughtered in southern Brazil

Detecção molecular de Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum e Sarcocystis spp. em tecidos de Sus scrofa abatidos no Sul do Brasil

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the presence of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora caninum, in tissues of wild boars slaughtered in southern Brazil. A total of 156 samples were collected from different organs of 25 wild boars, and DNA from at least one of the protozoa investigated was detected in 79 samples. To differentiate between infectious agents, restriction fragment length polymorphism was performed using the restriction enzymes DdeI and HpaII. For N. caninum, conventional PCR was performed with specific primers. The DNA of at least one of the studied pathogens was detected in each animal: 26.58% for T. gondii, 68.36% for Sarcocystis spp. and 5.06% for N. caninum. Coinfection between T. gondii and Sarcocystis spp. occurred in 14 animals, between T. gondii and N. caninum in only one male animal, between Sarcocystis spp. and N. caninum in a female, while co-infection with the three agents was equally observed in only one male animal. Considering the high frequency of detection and its zoonotic risk, especially T. gondii, it appears that wild boars can be potential sources of transmission of infectious agents and the adoption of monitoring measures in these populations should be prioritized.

Keywords:
Apicomplexa; neosporosis; PCR-RFLP; 18S rRNA; sarcocystosis; Sus scrofa; toxoplasmosis

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar a presença de ácido desoxirribonucléico (DNA) de Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp. e Neospora caninum, em tecidos de javalis abatidos no sul do Brasil. Foram coletadas 156 amostras de diferentes órgãos de 25 javalis, sendo detectado o DNA de pelo menos um dos protozoários pesquisados em 79 amostras. Para diferenciar entre os agentes infecciosos, o polimorfismo do comprimento do fragmento de restrição, foi realizado usando-se as enzimas de restrição DdeI e HpaII. Para N. caninum, a PCR convencional foi realizada com "primers" específicos. O DNA de pelo menos um dos patógenos estudados foi detectado em cada animal: 26,58% para T. gondii, 68,36% para Sarcocystis spp. e 5,06% para N. caninum. Coinfecção entre T. gondii e Sarcocystis spp. ocorreu em 14 animais; entre T. gondii e N. caninum em apenas um animal macho; entre Sarcocystis spp. e N. caninum em uma fêmea, enquanto a coinfecção com os três agentes foi observada igualmente em apenas um animal macho. Considerando-se a alta frequência de detecção e seu risco zoonótico, especialmente T. gondii, constata-se que os javalis podem ser potenciais fontes de transmissão de agentes infecciosos, e a adoção de medidas de monitoramento nessas populações devem ser priorizadas.

Palavras-chave:
Apicomplexa; neosporose; PCR-RFLP; 18S rRNA; sarcocistose; Sus scrofa; toxoplasmose

Introduction

Wild boars (Sus scrofa) are omnivorous animals and are among the most widely distributed large mammals in the world. Their population has increased significantly in recent decades (Massei et al., 2015), causing damage to crops, competing with native species, and acting as disease reservoirs for wild and domestic animals and humans (Miller et al., 2017). In Brazil, it is considered an invasive exotic fauna, and in several countries, its sport hunting is authorized as a method of limiting its superabundance (Pedrosa et al., 2015; Gazzonis et al., 2018).

In addition carcasses are not inspected and are exposed to precarious environments at the time of slaughter, which can carry several pathogens, thereby transmitting diseases to humans and animals, since a significant number of emerging zoonoses arise from interactions with wild animals. With that the consumption of meat from these animals is a risk factor for human and animal health, especially if it is consumed in raw or undercooked form (Zanella, 2016).

Among the infectious agents in which wild boars can participate in the cycle are the protozoa of the Phylum Apicomplexa, Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp., and Neospora caninum, which form tissue cysts. These are of great importance since T. gondii and some species of Sarcocystis spp. are zoonotic, and N. caninum is one of the main causes of abortion in cattle (Hill & Dubey, 2015; Damriyasa et al., 2004).

T. gondii infection is considered one of the most significant foodborne diseases transmitted by meat containing viable cysts, one of the main sources of infection, which can result in ocular, congenital, and even fatal toxoplasmosis in immunosuppressed individuals (Hill & Dubey, 2015; Djokic et al., 2016). In animals including pigs, it leads to abortion and neonatal death, resulting in considerable economic loss (Stelzer et al., 2019).

In humans, infections with Sarcocystis spp. are generally restricted to the gastrointestinal tract, and S. suihominis, in the case of wild boar, is zoonotic with transmission occurring through the ingestion of muscle Sarcocystis, which can cause nausea, stomach pain, vomiting, and diarrhea (Fayer et al., 2015; Gazzonis et al., 2019). Furthermore, humans can become definitive hosts for this pathogen after the accidental ingestion of oocysts. Symptoms, such as fever, myalgia, myositis, cough, bronchospasm, itchy rashes, and subcutaneous nodules, have been reported (Rosenthal, 2021), with the largest outbreaks recorded in Southeast Asia (Agholi et al., 2016; Shahari et al., 2016; Lau et al., 2014).

In swine infected with S. suihominis and S. miescheriana, lower weight gain, skin purpura, dyspnea, muscle tremors, abortion, and death have been reported, in addition to the formation of microscopic cysts in the muscles, even in animals with subclinical infections. Thus, the zoonotic risk associated with consumption of raw or undercooked meat should not be neglected (Dubey et al., 2015).

Another closely related Apicomplexa protozoan, Neospora spp., was originally described as causing neuromuscular disease in dogs but is currently a major cause of neonatal mortality, abortion, and encephalitis in ruminants (Lindsay et al., 1995; Lindsay & Dubey, 2020). Although there is no zoonotic evidence, wild boars, which are omnivorous animals, can act as intermediate hosts by developing cysts with bradyzoites in their muscles that can infect domestic or wild canids and other species of intermediate hosts (Haydett et al., 2021).

Despite the authorization for sport hunting, information about the pathogens that affect wild boars and their unique health risks is still scarce. In this context, the objective of this study was to verify the presence of Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp., and Neospora caninum in the tissues of wild boar slaughtered in the western region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, using PCR, Nested-PCR, and RFLP.

Materials and Methods

Animals and sample collection

A total of 156 Sus scrofa tissue samples (15 males and 10 females) were obtained from boars slaughtered through the Official Boar Population Control Program, in accordance with Normative Instruction 03 of January 31, 2013 (Brazilian Institute of the Environment - IBAMA) (Brasil, 2013), in the western region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, as shown in the highlighted area in Figure 1. Tissue samples were collected and stored separately in sterile bags and transported under refrigeration to the Laboratory of Immunology and Veterinary Microbiology of the Instituto Federal Farroupilha (LAMIVET/IFFar). Subsequently, the samples were stored at -20 °C and sent to the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases of the Federal University of Santa Maria (LADOPAR/UFSM) for molecular analysis. In the laboratory, aliquots of each tissue were collected, namely, the kidney (24), tonsils (21), spleen (25), heart (25), lungs (25), liver (25), diaphragm (3), and testes (8), and subjected to DNA extraction.

Figure 1
Map of Brazil with the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil highlighted. The western region of the state, where the tissue samples were collected from wild boars hunted for sport, is indicated in red.

DNA extraction and Nested-PCR

The samples were submitted to DNA extraction using a commercial kit (Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit - Promega®), according to the manufacturer's instructions and with modifications in the lysis step, performed at 55 °C for 16 hours to improve the sarcocyst disruption efficiency according to the protocol adapted by Bräunig et al. (2016). DNA samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis.

After extraction, Nested-PCR reactions were performed with a final volume of 25 µL to detect the agents Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora spp./Hammondia hammondi and Sarcocystis spp., through partial amplification of the 18S rRNA gene according to Silva et al. (2009) with adaptations, using, in the first reaction, the external primers Tg18s48F (5'-CCATGCATGTCTAAGTATAAGC-3') and Tg18s359R (5'-GTTACCCGTCACTGCCAC-3') and, in the second reaction, the internal primers Tg18s58F (5'-CTAAGTATAAGCTTTTATACGGC- 3') and Tg18s348R (5'-TGCCACGGTAGTCCAATAC-3'), under the following conditions: 34 cycles with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 55 °C for 45 s and extension at 72 °C for 45 s, followed by final extension at 72 °C for 5 min in a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad®, USA). The amplified products were visualized on 2% agarose gel in an ultraviolet transilluminator, stained with GelRed Nucleic Acid Stain (Promega®), and the expected final product was 290 bp for Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora spp./ H. hammondi and 310 bp for Sarcocystis spp. Neospora caninum strain NC1 and Toxoplasma gondii strain RH were used as positive controls, both from cell culture and a previously sequenced positive sample of Sarcocystis cruzi and as a negative control, ultrapure water was used.

Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP)

After the Nested-PCR reactions, the positive samples were submitted to the RFLP technique with restriction enzymes DdeI and HpaII, according to Silva et al. (2009), in a final reaction of 20 µL, Mili-Q Water 12.6 µL, buffer 2 µL, acetylated BSA 0.2 µL, enzyme 0.2 µL and DNA 5 µL, incubated at 37 °C for 60 min in a T100™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad®, USA). In all reactions, positive controls were used for each researched agent, from previously sequenced samples.

The fragments generated after digestion allowed the identification and differentiation of T. gondii, Neospora spp./H. hammondi, and Sarcocystis spp., where DdeI digested the T. gondii amplicon at two restriction sites, at 182 bp and 110 bp, from Neospora spp./H. hammondi and Sarcocystis spp. at a single restriction site, 290 bp and 320 bp, respectively. For the HpaII enzyme, the fragments generated were as follows: T. gondii two fragments, 173 bp and 119 bp, Neospora spp./H. hammondi two restriction sites, 173pb and 120pb, and Sarcocystis spp. with a single fragment of 320 bp. The resulting fragments were visualized on a 2% agarose gel and stained with GelRed nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen®), in an ultraviolet transilluminator, according to Figure S1 available in Supplementary Material.

PCR Neospora spp.

Samples positive for Neospora spp. and H. hammondi were subjected to conventional PCR using primers specific for Neospora spp., according to Müller et al. (1996). The reaction was performed using a T100™ thermocycler (Bio-Rad®, USA) and specific primers Np21F (5'-CCCAGTGCGTCCAATCCTGTAAC-3') and Np6R (5'-CTCGCCAGTCAACCTACGTCTTCT-3') in a final volume of 25 µL under the following conditions: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min; a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min; and refrigeration at 4 °C, with an expected final product of 328 bp. A sample of N. caninum previously sequenced was used as a positive control and ultrapure water as a negative control. The amplified products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with GelRed nucleic acid stain (Promega®) in an ultraviolet transilluminator.

DNA sequencing and analysis

For each species identified in the PCR-RFLP, such as Sarcocystis spp., T. gondii and Neospora spp. a duplicate sample was sent for nucleotide sequencing, from the amplified DNA products of the 18S region. The amplicons were purified using the commercial PureLink ® Quick Gel Extraction Kit and PCR Purification Combo Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Gene sequencing was performed by a specialized company ACTGene - Sequencing Service, Brazil. The samples were sequenced in duplicate, the results obtained were analyzed using the Staden Package software and the similarity with sequences deposited in GenBank determined using the BLAST - Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (NCBI, 2023).

Results

The results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2. It was possible to detect at least one of the agents investigated in all animals. Of the 25 animals, only eight did not present coinfection, with six positives for only Sarcocystis spp., four females and two males, while only two males were positive for T. gondii.

Table 1
Molecular detection of T. gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora caninum in wild boar in southern Brazil according to sex (F: females; M; males) and tissue evaluated. All animals were positive for at least one of the agents.

TISSUES:	KIDNEY	LIVER	TONSILS	SPLEEN	HEART	LUNG	DIAPHRAGM	TESTES
ANIMAL
M1	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC
M3	Sarcocystis spp.	T. gondii	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.
M4	NC	NC	NC	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	Neospora caninum
M5	NC	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
M6	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	Sarcocystis spp.
M7	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.
M8	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	Neospora caninum	NC	Sarcocystis spp.
M9	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	T. gondii	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
M10	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
M11	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
M12	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC	NC
M13	NC	T. gondii	T. gondii	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC
M14	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	NC
M15	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	NC
M16	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	T. gondii	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
F1	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC
F2	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC
F3	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC
F4	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC
F5	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	Neospora caninum	NC	NC	Neospora caninum	NC
F6	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	NC
F7	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC	NC
F8	T. gondii	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	T. gondii	NC	NC	NC	NC
F9	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	T. gondii	NC	NC	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC
F10	Sarcocystis spp.	Sarcocystis spp.	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC	NC

• NC: not collected.

Figure 2
Percentage of tissues positive for DNA of T. gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora caninum, after Nested-PCR, RFLP and conventional PCR reactions, according to the evaluated tissue of 25 wild boar from southern Brazil.

Two or more agents were detected in 17 of the animals (Table 1). Coinfection with T. gondii + Sarcocystis spp. in fourteen animals, being nine males and five females; T. gondii + Neospora caninum in only one male, Sarcocystis spp. + Neospora caninum in a female and the coinfection with the three agents: T. gondii + Sarcocystis spp. + Neospora caninum in a male animal. The distribution of each pathogen detected according to identification of the animal and tissue collected is shown in Table 1, and the detection rate is shown in Figure 2.

Of the 156 tissue samples evaluated, 79 (50.64%) were positive for at least one of the following agents: 21 (26.58%) for T. gondii, 54 (68.36%) for Sarcocystis spp., and 4 (5.06%) for Neospora caninum. The organs/tissues with the highest frequency of DNA detection, considering their total number in relation to the number of positive samples, were the liver, testis, diaphragm, and heart with 21, 8, 2, and 16 samples, respectively. The organs and tissues with the lowest frequency of detection were the kidney, tonsils, and lung, all with eight samples, followed by the spleen with 11 samples.

All sequenced samples confirm the presence of the three researched agents, with identity of T. gondii 99.61-100%, Neospora caninum 99.19-99.60% and Sarcocystis miescheriana 98.68-99.33% of homology with the partial nucleotide sequences of the 18S rRNA gene deposited in GenBank.

Discussion

The high frequency of DNA detection in protozoa of the phylum Apicomplexa found in the present study suggests the potential of wild boars as sources of pathogen transmission to both humans and animals. It is of great importance, especially for humans and animals that are associated with wild boar management, not only because of contact with infected tissues and blood but also because of the consumption of raw or undercooked meat. In addition, epidemiologically, these animals are in contact with other wild and domestic animals, which facilitates the spread of these and other unidentified pathogens (Guardone et al., 2022).

A significant percentage of 26.58% of tissues with detection of T. gondii corroborates the data from the meta-analysis of toxoplasmosis in wild boars by Rostami et al. (2017), who demonstrated a seroprevalence of 23%, most frequently in North America (32%) and Europe (26%). Lower detection rates were found in South America (5%); however, it should be noted that only two studies with 340 animals were included, and the real prevalence of the infection may be underestimated. In addition, studies on the detection of this agent in wild boars are still scarce and many countries do not present any data on their occurrence (Rostami et al., 2017).

In Brazil, Machado et al. (2019), in a survey in the south and midwest, found a high seroprevalence of T. gondii in hunters (32.7%), hunting dogs (31.2%), and wild boars (21.1%), all from the same region, highlighting these wild animals as potential sentinels for toxoplasmosis, especially in anthropized areas. Furthermore, Conrady et al. (2022) described the handling of game carcasses through direct contact with the blood of infected animals and droplet dispersion as a possible source of ocular toxoplasmosis acquired in previously healthy hunters and non-consumers of meat products from wild animals.

Like T. gondii, in recent years, the occurrence of Sarcocystis spp. in wild boar has been studied mainly by molecular methods in Latvia (Prakas et al., 2020), Italy (Gazzonis et al., 2019), Romania (Imre et al., 2017), Spain (Calero‐Bernal et al., 2016) and Portugal (Coelho et al., 2015), where a prevalence ranging from 8 to 69% of positive animals was found.

However, because of the smaller number of females evaluated in this study it is not possible to infer data on higher or lower frequency of detection in relation to the sex of the animals. Other studies have however, reported male wild boars with higher detection rates for T. gondii, ranging from 42% (Bassi et al., 2021) to 60% (Machado et al., 2021). This may be explained by the fact that male wild boars have solitary habits, travel longer distances in search of food when compared to females and young ones, thereby increasing the risk of infection (Machado et al., 2021; Rostami et al., 2017), as oocysts of this pathogen survive for long periods in an aquatic environment (Shapiro et al., 2019). This, combined with the scavenger and predatory habits associated with cannibalism in these animals may be a potential explanation for this observation (Ballari & Barrios‐García, 2014).

In the present study, Sarcocystis spp. was the most frequently detected protozoan, with 68.36% and 22 infected animals. This high detection frequency is probably related to the abundance of suitable definitive hosts circulating in the same environment, such as wild and domestic canids, and to the consumption of wild boars by these carnivores; this is the first report of the detection of Sarcocystis spp. in wild boars in Brazil.

In swine, in a single report by Espindola et al. (2022), in the central region of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, the frequency of anti-Sarcocystis spp. in 36.9% of blood serum samples from domestic animals, using the indirect immunofluorescence technique (IFAT), and a DNA detection rate of 67.9% in tissues by PCR, indicated that there is a wide circulation of the protozoan between animals and properties in the region and the potential risk of infection to humans and domestic animals living in the same place.

Although the zoonotic potential of Sarcocystis spp. is known, there are few reported cases of intestinal sarcocystosis in humans due to the consumption of raw or undercooked meat (Rosenthal, 2021). However, clinical infections are believed to be underreported or misdiagnosed because most infections are low-grade and asymptomatic (Poulsen & Stensvold, 2014; Fayer et al., 2015). Eating raw or undercooked wild boar meat can potentially pose a risk to human health.

In addition, according to Rosenthal (2021), hunters play an important role in the spread of zoonotic species of Sarcocystis spp., and the supply of the viscera of slaughtered animals to the dogs and remains of carcasses discarded freely in the environment can serve as food and transmit the agent to most of the diverse species that inhabit the place.

Little is known about the exact role of wild boars in the introduction and maintenance of N. caninum infection in the wild and its possible transmission to domestic animals (Haydett et al., 2021). In Brazil, studies have demonstrated the presence of antibodies against N. caninum in wild boars (Soares et al., 2016), but there are still no reports on the application of molecular diagnostic techniques. Reports of exposure to N. caninum in wild boars are limited to the US, with 15% in Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas (Bevins et al., 2013) and 15% in 21 states, ranging from 0% in California to 57% in Michigan (Cerqueira-Cézar et al., 2016). In humans, neosporosis is not considered a zoonosis; however, studies have demonstrated the presence of antibodies in hunters and animal handlers who are positive for the agent (Oshiro et al., 2015; Benetti et al., 2009). Furthermore, N. caninum DNA has been detected in the umbilical cord of immunosuppressed women, demonstrating its potential for infection in humans (Duarte et al., 2020; Villa et al., 2022).

Although the DNA detection rate was 5.06%, it is important to highlight that wild boars could be intermediate hosts for this agent (Cerqueira-Cézar et al., 2016). These animals may be infected through the ingestion of sporulated oocysts that remain viable in the soil, food, and water for long periods (Haydett et al., 2021).

In domestic swine, the occurrence of N. caninum is described in several countries. One of the highest reported seroprevalence cases occurred in Senegal, where 58.3% of the sows were infected (Kamga-Waladjo et al., 2010). In Italy, a prevalence of 6.7% was reported (Villa et al., 2022) and in China, from 0.3% to 4.6%, among animals from different provinces; this being the only study by molecular detection (Gui et al., 2020). In Brazil, the seroprevalence in commercial pigs varies from 3.1% (Azevedo et al., 2010) to 3.2% (Feitosa et al., 2014) in the northeast region, 13.5% (Minetto et al., 2019) in the midwest region, and 18.9% (Silva et al., 2020) in the southern region. According to Villa et al. (2022), domestic pigs are likely to be infected by ingesting water and food contaminated with sporulated oocysts from dogs or tissues with cysts from other intermediate hosts that circulate close to the facilities.

In addition, wild boar carcasses and viscera, as well as meat waste, when not properly disposed of in the home environment, can also act as a source of infection by these agents closely related to new hosts, such as free-living cats, capable of completing the life cycle of T. gondii and spread infective oocysts in the environment, and canids, in the case of N. caninum and Sarcocystis spp., to the most diverse animal species that are scavengers and do not have direct contact with wild animals (Coelho et al., 2015; Mateo‐Tomás et al., 2015).

Conclusion

Considering that all wild boars showed detection of at least one of the evaluated pathogens, there is a potential risk of transmission of these agents, especially T. gondii and Sarcocystis spp., through consumption and handling of raw and undercooked meat for both humans and animals. Therefore, it is important that this animal be monitored, as there are a large number of wild boars in Brazil. As the hunting of these animals has increased in recent years, it is also essential to monitor the occurrence of infectious agents in these populations. In addition, all pathogens detected can infect both humans and domestic animals. Therefore, monitoring measures and the correct disposal of carcasses and viscera from wild animals, especially wild boars, should be prioritized.

National Center for Biotechnology Information - NCBI BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool [online]. 2023 [cited 2023 jan 10]. Available from: https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material accompanies this paper.

Figure S1 Illustration of the observed pattern of the PCR product (without enzyme), and after digestion by DDEI and HPAII digestion enzymes, in agarose gel.

This material is available as part of the online article from https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023048

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES - Financial code 001) for the financial support.

• How to cite: Freitas BR, Rosa G, Roman IJ, Cunha RC, Gressler LT, Cargnelutti JF, et al. Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Sarcocystis spp in tissues of Sus scrofa slaughtered in southern Brazil. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2023; 32(3): e004623. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023048

• Ethics declaration

  No approval of research ethics committees was required to accomplish the goals of this study because experimental work was conducted with samples received for diagnosis.

References

• Agholi M, Taghadosi Z, Mehrabani D, Zahabiun F, Sharafi Z, Motazedian MH, et al. Human intestinal sarcocystosis in Iran: there but not seen. Parasitol Res 2016; 115(12): 4527-4533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5244-6 PMid:27637226.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5244-6
• Azevedo SS, Pena HFJ, Alves CJ, Guimarães AA Fo, Oliveira RM, Maksimov P, et al. Prevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii and anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in swine from Northeastern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2010; 19(2): 80-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612010000200002 PMid:20624342.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612010000200002
• Ballari SA, Barrios‐García MN. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Rev 2014; 44(2): 124-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mam.12015
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mam.12015
• Bassi AMG, Steiner JC, Stephan R, Nüesch-Inderbinen M. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Salmonella in Hunted Wild Boars from Two Different Regions in Switzerland. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11(8): 2227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082227 PMid:34438685.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11082227
• Benetti AH, Schein FB, Santos TR, Toniollo GH, Costa AJ, Mineo JR, et al. Pesquisa de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em bovinos leiteiros, cães e trabalhadores rurais da região Sudoeste do Estado de Mato Grosso. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl S 1): 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005 PMid:20040187.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005
• Bevins S, Blizzard E, Bazan L, Whitley P. Neospora caninum exposure in overlapping populations of coyotes (Canis latrans) and feral swine (Sus scrofa). J Wildl Dis 2013; 49(4): 1028-1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/2013-02-034 PMid:24502735.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.7589/2013-02-034
• Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente - IBAMA. Instrução Normativa 3, de 31 de janeiro de 2013. Decreta a nocividade do Javali e dispõe sobre o seu manejo e controle. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil [online]. Brasília, 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from: www.ibama.gov.br/component/legislacao/?view=legislacao&force=1&legislacao=129393
• Bräunig P, Portella LP, Cezar AS, Libardoni F, Sangioni LA, Vogel FSF, et al. DNA extraction methods and multiple sampling to improve molecular diagnosis of Sarcocystis spp. in cattle hearts. Parasitol Res 2016; 115(10): 3913-3921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5158-3 PMid:27277233.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-016-5158-3
• Calero‐Bernal R, Pérez‐Martín JE, Reina D, Serrano FJ, Frontera E, Fuentes I, et al. Detection of zoonotic protozoa Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcocystis suihominis in wild boars from Spain. Zoonoses Public Health 2016; 63(5): 346-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12243 PMid:26604045.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12243
• Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Pedersen K, Calero-Bernal R, Kwok OC, Villena I, Dubey JP. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Vet Parasitol 2016; 226: 35-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.06.023 PMid:27514880.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.06.023
• Coelho C, Gomes J, Inácio J, Amaro A, Mesquita JR, Pires I, et al. Unraveling Sarcocystis miescheriana and Sarcocystis suihominis infections in wild boar. Vet Parasitol 2015; 212(3-4): 100-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.08.015 PMid:26319199.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.08.015
• Conrady CD, Besirli CG, Baumal CR, Kovach JL, Etzel JD, Tsui JC, et al. Ocular toxoplasmosis after exposure to wild game. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2022; 30(3): 527-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1854316 PMid:33560166.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2020.1854316
• Damriyasa IM, Bauer C, Edelhofer R, Failing K, Lind P, Petersen E, et al. Cross-sectional survey in pig breedings farms in Hesse, Germany: seroprevalence and risk factors of infections with Toxoplasma gondii, Sarcocystis spp. and Neospora caninum in sows. Vet Parasitol 2004; 126(3): 271-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.016 PMid:15567591.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.07.016
• Djokic V, Fablet C, Blaga R, Rose N, Perret C, Djurkovic-Djakovic O, et al. Factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in confined farrow-to-finish pig herds in western France: an exploratory study in 60 herds. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9(1): 466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1753-5 PMid:27558270.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1753-5
• Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1 PMid:32493968.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1
• Dubey JP, Calero-Bernal R, Rosenthal BM, Speer CA, Fayer R. Sarcocystosis of animals and humans New York: CRC Press; 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19184
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19184
• Espindola BD, Fernandes F, Roman IJ, Samoel GVA, Barcelos RAD, Döhler AR, et al. Detection of Sarcocystis spp. and Toxoplasma gondii in swine and detection of DNA of these protozoa in tissues and sausages. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2022; 31(3): e009322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612022049 PMid:36074435.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612022049
• Fayer R, Esposito DH, Dubey JP. Human infections with Sarcocystis species. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28(2): 295-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00113-14 PMid:25715644.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00113-14
• Feitosa TF, Vilela VLR, de Melo LRB, de Almeida Neto JL, de Oliveira Souto DV, de Morais DF, et al. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in slaughtered pigs from Northeast, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2014; 202(3-4): 305-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.015 PMid:24703253.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.015
• Gazzonis AL, Gjerde B, Villa L, Minazzi S, Zanzani SA, Riccaboni P, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis miescheriana and Sarcocystis suihominis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Italy. Parasitol Res 2019; 118(4): 1271-1287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06249-2 PMid:30788573.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06249-2
• Gazzonis AL, Villa L, Riehn K, Hamedy A, Minazzi S, Olivieri E, et al. Occurrence of selected zoonotic food-borne parasites and first molecular identification of Alaria alata in wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Italy. Parasitol Res 2018; 117(7): 2207-2215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5908-5 PMid:29748713.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-5908-5
• Guardone L, Armani A, Mancianti F, Ferroglio E. A Review on Alaria alata, Toxoplasma gondii and Sarcocystis spp. in Mammalian Game Meat Consumed in Europe: Epidemiology, Risk Management and Future Directions. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12(3): 263. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12030263 PMid:35158587.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12030263
• Gui BZ, Lv QY, Ge M, Li RC, Zhu XQ, Liu GH. First report of Neospora caninum infection in pigs in China. Transbound Emerg Dis 2020; 67(1): 29-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13358 PMid:31538409.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13358
• Haydett KM, Peper ST, Webb CR, Tiffin HS, Wilson-Fallon AN, Jones-Hall YL, et al. Prevalence of Neospora caninum exposure in Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) from Oklahoma with implications of testing method on detection. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11(9): 2487. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092487 PMid:34573453.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11092487
• Hill DE, Dubey JP. Toxoplasma gondii In: Xiao L, Ryan U, Feng Y, editors. Biology of foodborne parasites 1st ed. New York: CRC Press; 2015. p. 224-237.
• Imre K, Sala C, Morar A, Imre M, Ciontu C, Chisăliță I, et al. Occurrence and first molecular characterization of Sarcocystis spp. in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) in Romania: public health significance of the isolates. Acta Trop 2017; 167: 191-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.038 PMid:28041999.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.038
• Kamga-Waladjo AR, Gbati OB, Kone P, Lapo RA, Chatagnon G, Bakou SN, et al. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies and its consequences for reproductive parameters in dairy cows from Dakar-Senegal, West Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod 2010; 42(5): 953-959. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9513-6 PMid:19997972.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9513-6
• Lau YL, Chang PY, Tan CT, Fong MY, Mahmud R, Wong KT. Sarcocystis nesbitti infection in human skeletal muscle: possible transmission from snakes. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2014; 90(2): 361-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0678 PMid:24420776.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.12-0678
• Lindsay DS, Dubey JP. Neosporosis, toxoplasmosis, and sarcocystosis in ruminants: an update. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2020; 36(1): 205-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.004 PMid:32029185.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.11.004
• Lindsay DS, Lenz SD, Cole RA, Dubey JP, Blagburn BL. Mouse model for central nervous system Neospora caninum infections. J Parasitol 1995; 81(2): 313-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3283943 PMid:7707216.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3283943
• Machado DMR, Barros LD, Nino BSL, de Souza Pollo A, dos Santos Silva AC, Perles L, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from the State of São Paulo, Brazil: Serology, molecular characterization, and hunter’s perception on toxoplasmosis. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep 2021; 23: 100534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100534 PMid:33678387.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100534
• Machado FP, Kmetiuk LB, Teider-Junior PI, Pellizzaro M, Yamakawa AC, Martins CM, et al. Seroprevalence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild boars (Sus scrofa), hunting dogs, and hunters of Brazil. PLoS One 2019; 14(10): e0223474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223474 PMid:31603911.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223474
• Massei G, Kindberg J, Licoppe A, Gacic D, Sprem N, Kamler J, et al. Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. Pest Manag Sci 2015; 71(4): 492-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.3965 PMid:25512181.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.3965
• Mateo‐Tomás P, Olea PP, Moleón MM, Vicente J, Botella F, Selva N, et al. From regional to global patterns in vertebrate scavenger communities subsidized by big game hunting. Divers Distrib 2015; 21(8): 913-924. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12330
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12330
• Miller RS, Sweeney SJ, Slootmaker C, Grear DA, Di Salvo PA, Kiser D, et al. Cross-species transmission potential between wild pigs, livestock, poultry, wildlife, and humans: implications for disease risk management in North America. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 7821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07336-z PMid:28798293.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07336-z
• Minetto MK, Witter R, Oliveira ACS, Minetto JA, Barros ML, Aguiar DM, et al. Antibodies anti-Toxoplasma gondii and anti-Neospora caninum in backyard pigs from the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2019; 28(3): 403-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019050 PMid:31390435.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019050
• Müller N, Zimmermann V, Hentrich B, Gottstein B. Diagnosis of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii infection by PCR and DNA hybridization immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol 1996; 34(11): 2850-2852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.11.2850-2852.1996 PMid:8897199.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.34.11.2850-2852.1996

• Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015 PMid:26516966.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015
• Pedrosa F, Salerno R, Padilha FVB, Galetti M. Current distribution of invasive feral pigs in Brazil: economic impacts and ecological uncertainty. Nat Conserv 2015; 13(1): 84-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.005
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ncon.2015.04.005
• Poulsen CS, Stensvold CR. Current status of epidemiology and diagnosis of human sarcocystosis. J Clin Microbiol 2014; 52(10): 3524-3530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00955-14 PMid:24759707.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00955-14
• Prakas P, Kirillova V, Dzerkale A, Kirjusina M, Butkauskas D, Gavarane I, et al. First molecular characterization of Sarcocystis miescheriana in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from Latvia. Parasitol Res 2020; 119(11): 3777-3783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06882-2 PMid:32929632.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-020-06882-2
• Rosenthal BM. Zoonotic Sarcocystis. Res Vet Sci 2021; 136: 151-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.008 PMid:33626441.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.008
• Rostami A, Riahi SM, Fakhri Y, Saber V, Hanifehpour H, Valizadeh S, et al. The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among wild boars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Parasitol 2017; 244: 12-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.07.013 PMid:28917302.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.07.013
• Shahari S, Tengku-Idris TIN, Fong MY, Lau YL. Molecular evidence of Sarcocystis nesbitti in water samples of Tioman Island, Malaysia. Parasit Vectors 2016; 9(1): 598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1883-9 PMid:27881179.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1883-9
• Shapiro K, Bahia-Oliveira L, Dixon B, Dumètre A, de Wit LA, VanWormer E, et al. Environmental transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: oocysts in water, soil and food. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2019; 15: e00049. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00049 PMid:32095620.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00049
• Silva MO, Snak A, Reiter JC, Serighelli G Jr, Cristani J, Moura AB. Occurrence of antibodies against Neospora caninum in sows and factors associated with infection in commercial herds in two regions of the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Semina: Ciênc Agrár 2020; 41(2): 697-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p697
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n2p697
• Silva RC, Su C, Langoni H. First identification of Sarcocystis tenella (Railliet, 1886) Moulé, 1886 (Protozoa: Apicomplexa) by PCR in naturally infected sheep from Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2009; 165(3-4): 332-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.07.016 PMid:19647370.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.07.016
• Soares HS, do Nascimento Ramos V, Osava CF, Oliveira S, Szabó MPJ, Piovezan U, et al. Occurrence of antibodies against Neospora caninum in wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the Pantanal, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 2016; 53(1): 112-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v53i1p112-116
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456.v53i1p112-116
• Stelzer S, Basso W, Silván JB, Ortega-Mora LM, Maksimov P, Gethmann J, et al. Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis in farm animals: risk factors and economic impact. Food Waterborne Parasitol 2019; 15: e00037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00037 PMid:32095611.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00037
• Villa L, Gazzonis AL, Allievi C, Zanzani SA, Mortarino M, Manfredi MT. Prevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies in fattening pigs and sows from intensive farms in northern Italy. Parasitol Res 2022; 121(3): 1033-1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07457-z PMid:35118513.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-022-07457-z
• Zanella JRC. Zoonoses emergentes e reemergentes e sua importância para saúde e produção animal. Pesq Agropec Bras 2016; 51(5): 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000500011
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000500011

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  11 Aug 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  16 Mar 2023
• Accepted
  22 June 2023