Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Coronary artery bypass using only computed tomography as pre-operative angiogram

Abstracts

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a well established procedure with current precise indications. The advent and spread of this technique was possible after the introduction of the coronary angiogram. Although many evaluation methods have been developed in the past years, to date, none have been able to replace the invasive coronary angiogram as a pre-operative exam. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as an alternative to invasive coronary angiogram. In this report we describe two CABG cases that were performed using only this technique as a pre-operative anatomic coronary arteries evaluation.

Coronary Angiography; Myocardial Revascularization; Tomography, Emission-Computed


A cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio (CRM) é um procedimento bem estabelecido com indicações atuais precisas. O advento e a disseminação dessa técnica foram possíveis após a introdução do angiograma coronário. Embora muitos métodos de avaliação tenham evoluído nos últimos anos, nenhum conseguiu substituir o angiograma coronário invasivo como exame pré-operatório. A tomografia computadorizada (TC) emergiu como uma alternativa ao angiograma coronário invasivo. O presente relato descreve dois casos de CRM realizadas usando-se apenas a TC como técnica de avaliação anatômica das artérias coronárias pré-operatória.

Angiografia Coronária; Revascularização Miocárdica; Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão


La cirugía de revascularización del miocardio (CRM) es un procedimiento bien establecido con indicaciones actuales precisas. El advenimiento y la divulgación de esta técnica fueron posibles después de la introducción del angiograma coronario. Aunque muchos métodos de evaluación hayan evolucionados en los últimos años, ninguno ha conseguido sustituir al angiograma coronario invasivo como examen preoperatorio. La tomografía computada (TC) surgió como una alternativa al angiograma coronario invasivo. El presente informe describe dos casos de CRM realizadas usando sólo la TC como técnica de evaluación anatómica de las arterias coronarias preoperatoria.

Angiografía coronaria; revascularización miocárdica; tomografía computada de emisión


CASE REPORT

Coronary artery bypass using only computed tomography as pre-operative angiogram

Diego Felipe Gaia; José Honório Palma; João Nelson Rodrigues Branco; Carlos Alberto Teles; Roberto Catani; Enio Buffolo

Universidade Federal De São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Mailing address

SUMMARY

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a well established procedure with current precise indications. The advent and spread of this technique was possible after the introduction of the coronary angiogram. Although many evaluation methods have been developed in the past years, to date, none have been able to replace the invasive coronary angiogram as a pre-operative exam. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as an alternative to invasive coronary angiogram. In this report we describe two CABG cases that were performed using only this technique as a pre-operative anatomic coronary arteries evaluation.

Key words: Coronary Angiography; Myocardial Revascularization; Tomography, Emission-Computed.

Background

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) is a well-established procedure with current precise indications. The advent and spread of this technique was possible after the introduction of the coronary angiogram by Sones1. The technique allowed precise identification of coronary stenosis and thus correct graft placement.

Although many evaluation methods have been developed in the past years, many of them non-invasive, to date, none have been able to replace the invasive coronary angiogram as a pre-operative exam, providing accurate coronary vessel topography, in order to perform the CABG.

Recently, the computed tomography angiography (CTA), especially the 64-slice CT, has emerged as an alternative to invasive coronary angiogram, with high sensitivity, specificity and predictive values, when compared to the gold standard method2. The main focus of the method, regarding cardiac surgery, is the evaluation of bypass patency.

To date, there have been no reports of CABG performed using the CT as the only pre-operative form of coronary angiogram. In this report we describe two CABG cases performed using only this technique as a pre-operative anatomic coronary artery evaluation.

Case Reports

Case 1

A 68 year-old male patient, with stable angina pectoris and numerous risk factors (tobacco, hypertension, high serum cholesterol and sedentary lifestyle) was admitted to our facility for a routine evaluation. The non-invasive stress test (echocardiogram) showed an ischemic area in the anterior left ventricle wall, in addition to normal ejection faction (60%) and ventricular diameters. Sinus rhythm was present.

A 64-slice CTA (Sensation Cardiac) was performed, indicating a single severe obstruction in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery. No artifact images were present at the examination, and good visualization of the vessel was achieved (Figure 1).


Superimposing of images of the ischemic areas of the two non-invasive studies allowed a safe assessment of the coronary anatomy and stenosis.

The patient's free and informed consent was obtained. The patient underwent an off-pump CABG and a left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD graft was performed. Intra-operative and post-operative periods were uneventful. The control non-invasive ischemic test demonstrated relief of ischemia and the patient became asymptomatic.

Case 2

A 62-year-old male patient, with previous myocardial infarction and multiple risk factors (tobacco use, hypertension and diabetes) was admitted to our unit with stable angina and a positive, non-invasive, ischemic test for evaluation.

A 64-slice CTA (Sensation Cardiac) was performed, indicating a single severe obstruction in the proximal LAD. No artifact images were present at the examination, and good visualization of the vessel was achieved.

Superimposing of images of the ischemic areas of the two non-invasive studies allowed a safe assessment of the coronary anatomy and stenosis.

The patient's free and informed consent was obtained. The patient underwent an off-pump CABG and a LIMA-LAD graft was performed. Intra-operative and post-operative periods were uneventful. The control non-invasive ischemic test could demonstrate relief of ischemia and the patient became asymptomatic.

Comments

The first reports of the use of CTA for the evaluation of CABG are from the 80´s3. Unfortunately, for many years the technique remained underused, mainly due to inadequate resolution, capture speed and ECG gating. In the last years, interesting news has been reported about the method. New 64-slice CTA equipment is now able to provide improved images with a resolution and capability similar to conventional invasive coronary angiogram with high sensitivity and specificity2.

The majority of studies aim to assess the grafts, not the native coronary vessels. Because of that, there is still a lack of consistent information regarding the method's capacity to correctly define the native coronary bed. A recent report demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 97% in detecting lesions in patients with suspected coronary artery disease4.

In spite of these good results, some technical issues remain unsolved. Breath holding, presence of metal clips (re-operative patients) and intense calcium artifacts reduce image quality and the method's cpacity to provide precise and perfect images. The evaluation of the retrograde flow is another question; the evaluation of the distal anastomotic site is still challenging5.

The role and effectiveness of CTA is controversial and lack a strong evidence base to allow a widespread use and avoidance of invasive study. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that CTA is comparable to invasive angiogram in evaluating grafts, but could not demonstrate the same regarding native coronary vessels and suggested new randomized clinical trials in order to achieve sufficiently powerful evidence to clarify this issue6.

On the other hand, the demand for a precise, rapid and non-invasive method for assessing the coronary tree is mandatory. The risk of invasive coronary angiography is low, but the complications are serious and many of them are life-threatening7. Furthermore, the use of radiation is increased in CTA, comparable to invasive angiogram.

In re-operative patients the use of CTA can provide useful information as graft position for a safer sternotomy, not only patency. In this scenario, the use of only CTA to perform CABG is limited to a small number of patients with well-defined lesions, no intense calcium presence and avoidance of artifacts. The absence of arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, and a low cardiac frequency are mandatory.

The constant evolution of computed tomography images and software to reduce artifacts with improved acquisition speed will probably, in a near future, provide images comparable to the gold-standard invasive coronary angiogram. This evolution will represent a cornerstone in the coronary artery disease assessment and treatment, giving a better opportunity to the patient and his clinician, interventional cardiology and surgeon to choose the better approach to CAD in each specific situation, no longer under the pressure of an in-site catheter presence.

The advancement and improvement of the recent CTA will probably, in a near future, provide adequate native and coronary graft visualization and assessment, allowing this technique to be the only method needed in the pre-operative and post-operative periods.

The possible avoidance of invasive coronary angiogram will reduce patients' risks and will provide a valuable tool in the pre-operative selection of the best CAD treatment, including CABG.

Potential Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Sources of Funding

There were no external funding sources for this study.

Study Association

This study is not associated with any post-graduation program.

References

  • 1. Sones FM Jr, Shirey EK. Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1962; 31:735-8.
  • 2. Jabara R, Chronos N, Klein L, Eisenberg S, Allen R, Bradford S, et al. Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass grafts. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99 (11): 1529-34.
  • 3. Brundage BH, Lipton MJ, Herfkens RJ, Berninger WH, Redington RW, Chatterjee K, et al. Detection of patent coronary bypass grafts by computed tomography: a preliminary report. Circulation. 1980; 61 (4): 826-31.
  • 4. Ropers D, Pohle FK, Kuettner A, Pflederer T, Anders K, Daniel WG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotation. Circulation. 2006; 114 (22): 2334-41.
  • 5. Chiurlia E, Menozzi M, Ratti C, Romagnoli R, Modena MG. Follow-up of coronary artery bypass graft patency by multislice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95 (9): 1094-7.
  • 6. Jones CM, Athanasiou T, Dunne N, Kirby J, Aziz O, Haq A, et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in coronary artery bypass graft assessment: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83 (1): 341-8.
  • 7. Bashore TM, Bates ER, Berger PB, Clark DA, Cusma JT, Dehmer GJ, et al. American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37 (8): 2170-214.
  • Correspondência:

    Diego Felipe Gaia
    Departamento de Cirurgia Cardiovascular da Universidade Federal de São Paulo
    Rua Botucatu, 740, 3º Andar - Vila Clementino
    041038-000 - São Paulo, SP, Brasil
    E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      22 Oct 2009
    • Date of issue
      Sept 2009

    History

    • Received
      19 May 2008
    • Reviewed
      06 Aug 2008
    • Accepted
      06 Aug 2008
    Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia - SBC Avenida Marechal Câmara, 160, sala: 330, Centro, CEP: 20020-907, (21) 3478-2700 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil, Fax: +55 21 3478-2770 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: revista@cardiol.br