Abstracts
OBJECTIVE: To describe the construction of a factor of allocation of financial resources, based on the population's health needs. METHODS: Quantitative study with data collected from public databases referring to the state of Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil, between 2000 and 2010. Variables which reflected epidemiological, demographic, socio-economic and educational processes were selected in order to create a factor of allocation which highlighted the health needs of the population. The data sources were: SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) Department of Computer Science, Atlas of Human Development in Brazil, IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), Information System on Public Health Budgets, National Treasury and data from the Pernambuco Health Secretariat between 2000 and 2010. Pearson's coefficient was used to assess linear correlation and the factor of allocation was calculated using analysis by artificial neural networks. The quartiles of the municipalities were defined according to their health needs. RESULTS: The distribution shown here highlights that all the coastal region, a good part of the Mata Norte and Mata Sul regions and the Agreste Setentrional and Agreste Central regions are in Quartile 1, that which has the largest number of municipalities. The Agreste Meridional region had municipalities in all of the quartiles. In the Pajeú/Moxotó region, many of the municipalities were in Quartile 1. Similar distribution was verified in the Sertão Central region. In the Araripe region, the majority of the municipalities were in Quartiles 3 or 4 and the São Francisco region was divided between Quartiles 1, 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: The factor of allocation grouped together municipalities of Pernambuco according to variables related to public health needs and separated those with extreme needs, requiring greater financial support, from those with lesser needs.
Health Care Rationing, economics; Equity in the Resource, Allocation; Decision Making, Organizational; Neural Networks (Computer)
OBJETIVO: Descrever a construção de fator de alocação de recursos financeiros com base na necessidade em saúde da população. MÉTODOS: Estudo quantitativo, com dados coletados em bases de domínio público, referentes ao estado de Pernambuco nos anos entre 2000 e 2010. Foram selecionadas variáveis que refletissem os indicadores epidemiológicos, demográficos, socioeconômicos e educacionais para compor um fator de alocação que apontasse as necessidades de saúde da população. As fontes pesquisadas foram: Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde, Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Sistema de Informações sobre Orçamentos Públicos em Saúde, Tesouro Nacional e dados da Secretaria Estadual de Saúde de Pernambuco de 2000 a 2010, de acordo com a disponibilidade da informação mais recente. Foi realizada a correlação linear de Pearson e, para o cálculo do fator de alocação, a análise pelas Redes Neurais Artificiais. Os quartis dos municípios foram definidos segundo as necessidades em saúde. RESULTADOS: A distribuição apresentada aponta a Região Litorânea e boa parte da Região da Mata Norte e Sul e do Agreste Setentrional e Central situados no Quartil 1, este com o maior número de municípios. O Agreste Meridional teve municípios em todos os quartis. Na Região do Pajeú/Moxotó, grande parte dos municípios esteve no Quartil 1. Semelhante distribuição foi verificada no Sertão Central. No Araripe, a maioria dos municípios esteve nos Quartis 3 ou 4 e a Região do São Francisco ficou dividida entre os Quartis 1, 2 e 3. CONCLUSÕES: O fator de alocação agregou os municípios pernambucanos, por agrupar variáveis que são relacionadas com as necessidades em saúde da população, e separou os que possuem extremas necessidades de maior aporte financeiro daqueles que precisam com menor intensidade.
Dotação de Recursos para Cuidados de Saúde, economia; Equidade na Alocação de Recursos; Tomada de Decisões Gerenciais; Redes Neurais (Computação)
OBJETIVO: Describir la construcción de factor de asignación de recursos financieros basándose en la necesidad en la salud de la población. MÉTODOS: Estudio cuantitativo, con datos colectados en bases de dominio público, referentes al estado de Pernambuco, Brasil, en los años entre 2000 y 2010. Se seleccionaron variables que reflejasen los indicadores epidemiológicos, demográficos, socioeconómicos y educacionales para componer un factor de asignación que señale las necesidades de salud de la población. Las fuentes investigadas fueron: Departamento de Informática del Sistema Único de Salud, el Atlas de Desarrollo Humano en Brasil, el Instituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística, el Sistema de Informaciones sobre Presupuestos Públicos en Salud, el Tesoro Nacional y datos de la Secretaria Estatal de Salud de Pernambuco de 2000 a 2010, de acuerdo con la disponibilidad de la información más reciente. Se realizó la correlación linear de Pearson y para el cálculo del Factor de Asignación, el análisis por las redes neurales artificiales. Los cuartiles de los municipios fueron definidos según las necesidades en salud. RESULTADOS: La distribución presentada sitúa la Región Costera y buena parte de la Región de la Selva Norte y Sur y del Agreste Septentrional y Central, en el Cuartil 1, con el mayor número de municipios. El Agreste Meridional tuvo municipios en todos los cuartiles. En la Región de los ríos Pajeú/Moxotó, gran parte de los municipios estuvo en el Cuartil 1. Se verificó distribución semejante en el Sertón Central. En el Araripe, la mayoría de los municipios estuvo en los Cuartiles 3 o 4, y la Región de Sao Francisco se dividió entre los Cuartiles 1, 2 y 3. CONCLUSIONES: El factor de Asignación agregó los municipios pernambucanos, por agrupar variables que son relacionadas con las necesidades en salud de la población y separó los que poseen extremas necesidades de mayor aporte financiero de aquellos que lo precisan con menor intensidad.
Dotación de Recursos para Cuidados de Salud, economía; Equidad en la Asignación de Recursos; Tomada de Decisiones Gerenciales; Redes Neurales (Computación)
ORIGINAL ARTICLES
PUBLIC HEALTH PRACTICE
Marina Araújo RosasI; Adriana Falangola Benjamin BezerraII; Paulo José Duarte-NetoIII
IPrograma de Pós-graduação Integrado em Saúde Coletiva. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, PE, Brasil
IIDepartamento de Medicina Social. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Recife, PE, Brasil
IIIDepartamento de Estatística e Informática.Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Recife, PE, Brasil
Correspondence
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the construction of a factor of allocation of financial resources, based on the population's health needs.
METHODS: Quantitative study with data collected from public databases referring to the state of Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil, between 2000 and 2010. Variables which reflected epidemiological, demographic, socio-economic and educational processes were selected in order to create a factor of allocation which highlighted the health needs of the population. The data sources were: SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System) Department of Computer Science, Atlas of Human Development in Brazil, IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), Information System on Public Health Budgets, National Treasury and data from the Pernambuco Health Secretariat between 2000 and 2010. Pearson's coefficient was used to assess linear correlation and the factor of allocation was calculated using analysis by artificial neural networks. The quartiles of the municipalities were defined according to their health needs.
RESULTS: The distribution shown here highlights that all the coastal region, a good part of the Mata Norte and Mata Sul regions and the Agreste Setentrional and Agreste Central regions are in Quartile 1, that which has the largest number of municipalities. The Agreste Meridional region had municipalities in all of the quartiles. In the Pajeú/Moxotó region, many of the municipalities were in Quartile 1. Similar distribution was verified in the Sertão Central region. In the Araripe region, the majority of the municipalities were in Quartiles 3 or 4 and the São Francisco region was divided between Quartiles 1, 2 and 3.
CONCLUSIONS: The Factor of Allocation grouped together municipalities of Pernambuco according to variables related to public health needs and separated those with extreme needs, requiring greater financial support, from those with lesser needs.
Descriptors: Health Care Rationing, economics. Equity in the Resource Allocation. Decision Making, Organizational. Neural Networks (Computer).
RESUMEN
OBJETIVO: Describir la construcción de factor de asignación de recursos financieros basándose en la necesidad en la salud de la población.
MÉTODOS: Estudio cuantitativo, con datos colectados en bases de dominio público, referentes al estado de Pernambuco, Brasil, en los años entre 2000 y 2010. Se seleccionaron variables que reflejasen los indicadores epidemiológicos, demográficos, socioeconómicos y educacionales para componer un factor de asignación que señale las necesidades de salud de la población. Las fuentes investigadas fueron: Departamento de Informática del Sistema Único de Salud, el Atlas de Desarrollo Humano en Brasil, el Instituto Brasileño de Geografía y Estadística, el Sistema de Informaciones sobre Presupuestos Públicos en Salud, el Tesoro Nacional y datos de la Secretaria Estatal de Salud de Pernambuco de 2000 a 2010, de acuerdo con la disponibilidad de la información más reciente. Se realizó la correlación linear de Pearson y para el cálculo del Factor de Asignación, el análisis por las redes neurales artificiales. Los cuartiles de los municipios fueron definidos según las necesidades en salud.
RESULTADOS: La distribución presentada sitúa la Región Costera y buena parte de la Región de la Selva Norte y Sur y del Agreste Septentrional y Central, en el Cuartil 1, con el mayor número de municipios. El Agreste Meridional tuvo municipios en todos los cuartiles. En la Región de los ríos Pajeú/Moxotó, gran parte de los municipios estuvo en el Cuartil 1. Se verificó distribución semejante en el Sertón Central. En el Araripe, la mayoría de los municipios estuvo en los Cuartiles 3 o 4, y la Región de Sao Francisco se dividió entre los Cuartiles 1, 2 y 3.
CONCLUSIONES: El factor de Asignación agregó los municipios pernambucanos, por agrupar variables que son relacionadas con las necesidades en salud de la población y separó los que poseen extremas necesidades de mayor aporte financiero de aquellos que lo precisan con menor intensidad.
Descriptores: Dotación de Recursos para Cuidados de Salud, economía. Equidad en la Asignación de Recursos. Tomada de Decisiones Gerenciales. Redes Neurales (Computación).
INTRODUCTION
When looking at current health care policies in Brazil, it is impossible to ignore the 1988 Federal Constitution,ª which recognized health as a basic human right and the duty of the State. The aim of the legislators was to guarantee the equal and universal right to health by links with economics and not merely with the social area.
To make what is stated in the Constitution a reality, in this particular, it was necessary to involve what had already been structured, such as establishing a health care framework which embraced all Brazilians and operated according to principles of equality.11
Equality is a principle which governs distributive functions aiming to compensate or overcomes existing inequalities, considered to be socially unfair and avoidable
Including principles of equality when formulating health care policies is not automatically accompanied by the implementation of policies which result in higher levels of equality in the health care services provided.1
It is not just about passing laws, but about putting into practice the rights of the society, won by the 1988 Constitution. The State's obligation, if it does not withdraw from its commitment to society, needs to be carried out, seeking constitutional ideals consistent with its ability to execute them. Implementing public policies in favor of the citizens depends on financial support from federal bodies and on the efficient distribution of these resources.1
Allocating federal resources for health care to Brazilian municipalities obeys two criteria, according to the type of care in question. In primary health care, this distribution is according to quantitative population; and, for medium and high complexity medical procedures, resources are passed on according to the services performed. This scenario tends to favor more developed localities and contributes to intensifying inequalities in allocation of and access to health care resources among different regions of the country
A study by the João Pinheiro Foundation showed significant inequalities in the distribution of federal resources earmarked for health care between regions and municipalities.f There are social inequalities in access to health care services, in favor of the better-off segments of the population. This inequality is even more in evidence when curative health care is looked at.6
Socio-economic and epidemiological differences between municipalities should be taken into consideration when allocating financial resources to health care. Using methodologies which take into account criteria of equality and respect local, municipal and regional peculiarities is of fundamental importance for sustainability and in order to guarantee the rights advocated by the SUS (Brazilian Unified Health System).
Studies have been carried out on allocating resources based on the Brazilian population's health needs. Bearing in mind the lack of such studies specific to the state of Pernambuco, the Research Group on the Political Economy of Health from Universidade Federal de Pernambuco created a methodology for allocating financial resources to health care, using analysis by the statistical model of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to create a factor of allocation (FA).
The ANN is flexible as to the specifications of the system, meaning it has a wide variety of uses, including for classification. It is notable for its ability to evaluate itself.2 The ANN has the ability to correct imprecise data, which makes it efficient in tasks for which it is not easy to formulate a set of rules, such as the proposal of calculating a FA.
METHODS
This study is part of the research project entitled "Equitable allocation of financial resources for health in Pernambuco: a methodological proposal", carried out between 2009 and 2011.
Municipalities of the state of Pernambuco which provided the information necessary to create the analysis database were included. Indicators which reflected the population's health needs were chosen to construct the FA. Eighteen variables encompassing demographic, epidemiological, socio-economic and educational issues were selected, these being: infant mortality, mortality under five years of age, early mortality of the elderly, proportional mortality from external causes, mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, mortality due to infectious and parasitic diseases, mortality due to cancer, the percentage of deaths due to unknown causes, proportion of teenage mothers, the proportion of inadequate prenatal care, fertility rate, Gini index, proportion of elderly in the population, literacy rate, financing capacity per capita, percentage of people with income per capita below ½ minimum wage, percentage of urban households with basic sanitation and proportion of urban households served by garbage collection.
The variables were collected in databases in the public domain: The SUS Department of Computer Science, Human Development Atlas in Brazil, IBGE, Information System on Public Health Budgets and National Treasury, with the exception of the variable of early mortality of the elderly, where the data for the years 2000-2010 the most recent available, were provided by the Pernambuco Health Department.
It was necessary to standardize the configuration of each response based on the variables selected. The data obtained from the municipalities studied were organized by locality using Excel 2007 software. Preliminary analysis of the variables and their description was carried out to obtain a preliminary understanding of the municipalities' situations.
The degrees of correlation between the variables were analyzed using Pearson's linear correlation analysis. When the preliminary analysis had been carried out on the selected variables, the FA proposed by the was constructed in the following stages:
1) Standardizing the variables: due to the different magnitudes between the variables, all were standardized to have a mean of 0 and a variance of 1.
2) Two fictitious municipalities were created, based on minimum and maximum values from the sample: one "very bad" municipality, which had all the "worst" values for each variable, and one "excellent" municipality, with the "best" values for each variable.
3) After the creation of these two fictitious municipalities, a random sample of 200 municipalities between the "excellent" and the "very bad" was obtained, added to the values of the variable of the two fictitious municipalities, this produced uniform, continuous noise, varying between 0 and 0.01.
4) Half of the sample obtained in the previous stage was randomly selected to tune the ANN; the other half was used in the cross validation of the model. The sample of municipalities studied was used in the network testing stage.
5) The Intelligent Problem solver technique of the neural network packet of the Statistica software version 7.0 (StatSoft, Inc.) was used to obtain the best ANN model which classified the municipalities into two groups, "bad" and "good", considering the type of network (Multilayer Perceptron - MLP, Linear - LN and Radial Basis Function - RBF) and the number of hidden layers. The program provided the five best networks based on validation and test errors. The best network was that which had the lowest validation error.
6) The level of confidence of the classification of a certain municipality in one of the two groups was used as the FA.
This procedure generated the FA for the RGPEH's Artificial Neural Network. Working with secondary data may lead to errors due to not controlling the recording of the variables in question. Moreover, the problem of the year stands out as, for the set of indicators selected in this study it was not possible to find data referring to the same annual period. Thus, it was decided to work with the most recently available data. Public databases which had been used in other methodologies with the same objective as this study were considered.
The Statistica 7 (StatSoft, Inc.) program was used.
RESULTS
Using the Intelligent Problem Solver technique, the radial basis function was the type of ANN which performed best.
The results for the five best networks indicated by the Intelligent Problem Solver sechnique, and in agreement with the FA, included the profile (number of inputs, hidden and output layers) and levels of accuracy and error in the training, validation and test stages for each network (Table 1).
The variables translated into a network with 18 inputs, 12 hidden neurons, one hidden layer and one output. Table 2 shows the medians and minimum and maximum values for each variable, as well as the municipalities which presented these values.
In Table 3, the influence of each variable in determining the quartile in which each municipality was placed according to the ANN method is shown.
Statistical analysis allowed the municipalities to be divided into quartiles which represent:
Quartile 1 - Municipalities with fewer health care needs, composed of 97 localities which presented the best results for the variables which represented the economic status of the municipality and its sanitary and health care conditions.
Quartile 2 - Municipalities with medium health care needs, composed of 40 localities.
Quartile 3 - Municipalities with considerable health care needs, composed of 27 localities.
Quartile 4 - Municipalities with major health care needs, made up of 17 localities which presented the worst results for the variables which represented the economic status of the municipality and its sanitary and health care conditions.
The figure represents the geographical distribution of the 184 municipalities of Pernambuco, according to the quartiles indicated by the FA. It is notable that all of the coastal region, a good part of the Mata Norte and Mata Sul regions and the Agreste Setentrional and Agreste Central regions are located in Quartile 1. The Agreste Meridional region has municipalities in all of the quartiles. In the Pajeú/Moxotó region, a large part of the municipalities are in Quartile 1. A similar distribution can be observed in the Sertão Central region. In the Araripe region, the majority of the municipalities were in Quartiles 3 and 4 and in the São Francisco region they were divided between Quartile 1, 2 and 3.
DISCUSSION
The difficulty in defining and putting into practice a simple criterion for allocating resources which reflects health care priorities and policies and reduces inequalities emphasizes the need to discuss and analyze more deeply the allocation of financial resources
Some characteristics which should be considered when selecting variables to reflect the population's health needs are: vulnerability to being manipulated by those who manage public policy; true representation of factors of need; exemption from the process of political choice and the availability of reliable data.
The data necessary in order to obtain reliable results came from different years, especially in smaller municipalities, however, the data from the most recent year available was used. The limitation and quality of the data from small municipalities was found in another study.8 The authors of this study opted to group the regions together in order to carry out the analysis. This option was not available to this study, as the unit of study was the municipality.
The municipalities in Pernambuco show high values for mortality under five years of age and diseases of the circulatory system, percentage of live births with inadequate prenatal care and people with income per capita below $ 40.81. This shows the where state's major needs for health care are. The analyses reveal values which positively show the situation in the state of Pernambuco as regards means found for illiteracy rates, percentages of homes which are served by rubbish collections and mortality due to infectious and parasitic diseases.
The municipalities of Manari and Ipojuca stand out as where the minimum and maximums for each value were found. The former, for having the worst levels for the variables: illiteracy rate, percentage of people with income per capita below $ 40.81, percentage of homes which are served by garbage collections and mortality under five years of age. The latter showed the best results for the variables: ICMS
For each of the variables, a value considered excellent was given, in accordance with the sample. The locality which achieved this value was denominated as an excellent municipality (me). These data guided the ANN tuning stage.
One of the municipalities studied presented a minimum value for the variable percentage of urban households with basic sanitation, indicating that the health of the inhabitants of this locality was somewhat vulnerable, given that environmental conditions are determining factors in health problems.9 Another municipality was notable for having the lowest value for the variable mortality due to infectious and parasitic diseases. This suggests a good association with the health care situation in the municipality. However, the possibility that this data was under reported should be considered.
The municipalities in Pernambuco showed high variability in the values of a good part of the variables in the descriptive analysis: the coefficient of infant mortality, ICMS per capita, percentage of deaths due to unknown causes, financing capacity per capita and percentage of urban households with basic sanitation. This may indicate inter-municipal differences within the state, suggesting the need for differentiated allocation of health care resources suitable to each places circumstances, justifying the adoption of an index which reflects the health needs of each municipality.
Choosing a statistical method for calculating the FA should be considered, due to the scope and complexity of measuring health care needs in a specific population. Using ANN to choose is based on a theoretically structured reference, as they are systems of artificial intelligence which mimic the problem solving processes in the human brain, i.e., they formulate and apply knowledge acquired from past experience in order to solve new problems or situations. This model appeared as an attempt to mathematically simulate the human nervous system, and the network is a representation of the neurons available for the analysis of specific input signals in mathematical terms.10
With this functioning, ANN has a wide range of applications in diverse areas of science and technology, including in health. In medicine, researchers use Multilayer Perceptron ANN in "Diagnosing Interstitial Lung Injury",
This model has the capacity to offer good responses, even with secondary data, which may be confusing or noisy, as the weighting of each variable is adjusted according to the network's learning process. This makes it applicable to a wide range of circumstances.9
ANN has been shown to be a powerful tool, adapted to carry out various tasks such as: memorizing, associating, pattern recognition, generalization, and analyzing multi-variate non-linear data, among others.14 This range of applications is a result of its flexible nature of the system specification.2,14 ANNs have a statistical base inherent on the impact of input distribution (non-normal) on estimating weighting. The main difference in relation to multiple techniques is the absence of any statistical inference test for the model's adjusted weightings.2
The ANN which composed the FA had a good number of hidden neurons, given the complexity of the topic proposed. Neural networks which have few hidden neurons are preferred for their tendency to reach higher generalization powers, reducing overfitting; however, they may not have sufficient ability to model data which involve complex problems.
The FA presented constitutes a comprehensive methodological proposal, as it incorporates in its wake not only variables belonging to health but also those which bring socio-economic, demographic and educational dimensions. It is viable to use ANN with a good number of variables, as this statistical technique permits the use of many indicators, given its generalization power. The results show a distribution in which municipalities recognized as needing greater financial support for health care were placed in quartiles considered good (1 and 2). The contrary was also observed, i.e., places which were well supported by resources were placed in quartiles 3 and 4. The proposed FA showed the municipalities in quartile 4 to be well placed, according to their socio-economic and epidemiological circumstances.
The higher quantity of municipalities placed in the quartile with fewest needs led to the conclusion that the FA presented distributed the municipalities, separating those with extreme need for more financial support from those which showed less serious need for financial support.
This study may serve as a reference for comparative research, not just in Pernambuco but extrapolated to other places. The complexities involved in choosing the variables which best reflect the health care needs implies the existence of additional studies using ANNs statistical techniques, which allows the addition of other variables which may express the population's health care needs. It may even relate them to financial data to contribute to the improvement of knowledge and the pursuit of more equitable allocation criteria.
The importance of methodologies for the equitable allocation of health care resources by figures in the public negotiation spaces and definition of the distribution of these resources should be contextualized and used as an instrument to support equitable distribution, bearing in mind other indicators of the dynamic reality of the functioning of the municipal health care system.
REFERENCES
- 1. Almeida C, Travassos C, Porto SM, Baptista T. A reforma sanitária brasileira: em busca da equidade. Washington (DC): Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde; 1999. (OPAS. Pesquisa em Saúde. Documentos Técnicos, 17).
- 2. Hair JF, Tatham RL, Anderson RE, Black W. Análise multivariada de dados. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2005. Técnicas emergentes em análise multivariada; cap.12, p.545-50.
- 3. Haykin S. Redes neurais: princípios e práticas. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 1999.
- 4. Heller L. Relação entre saúde e saneamento na perspectiva do desenvolvimento. Cienc Saude Coletiva 1998;3(2):73-84. DOI:10.1590/S1413-81231998000200007
- 5. Hirshberg A, Adar R. Artificial neural networks in medicine. Isr J Med Sci 1997;33(10):700-2.
- 6. Noronha KVMS, Andrade MV. Desigualdades sociais em saúde: evidências empíricas sobre o caso brasileiro. Rev Econ Nordeste 2001;32(N. Espec):877-97.
- 7. Porto S, Martins M, Travassos C, Viacava F. Avaliação de uma metodologia de alocação de recursos financeiros do setor saúde para aplicação no Brasil. Cad Saude Publica 2007;23(6):1393-402. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2007000600014
- 8. Porto SM, Viacava F, Szwarcwald CL, Martins M, Travassos C, Vianna SM, et al. Alocação equitativa de recursos financeiros: uma alternativa para o caso brasileiro. Saude Debate. 2003;27(65):376-85.
- 9. Samarasinghe S. Neural networks for applied sciences and engineering: from fundamentals to complex pattern recognition. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications/Taylor and Francis Group; 2006.
- 10. Sarle WS. Neural networks and statistical models. In: Procedings of the 19. Annual SAS Users Group International Conference; 1994 Apr; Dallas, Texas. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1994.
- 11. Silva PLB. Serviços de Saúde: o dilema do SUS na nova década. São Paulo Perspect 2003;14(1):69-85. DOI:10.1590/S0102-88392003000100008
- 12. Tafner MA, Xerez M, Rodrigues Filho IW. Redes neurais artificiais: introdução e princípios de neurocomputação. Blumenau: Eko; 1996.
- 13. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22(3):429-45.
- 14. Zhang G, Hu MY, Patuwo BE, Indro DC. Artificial neural networks in bankruptcy prediction: general framework and cross-validation analysis. Eur J Oper Res 1999;116(1):16-32. DOI:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00051-4
Use of artificial neural networks in applying methodology for allocating health resources
.11,
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
17 May 2013 -
Date of issue
Feb 2013
History
-
Received
20 Dec 2012 -
Accepted
23 July 2012