Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

2- Isopentenyladenine in the induction of direct somatic embryogenesis capacity of Coffea arabica L.

2- Isopenteniladenina na capacidade de indução da embriogênese somática direta de Coffea arabica L.

ABSTRACT:

This study evaluated the effect of different concentrations of 2-isopentenyladenine (2-iP) on the direct somatic embryogenesis capacity of the Mundo Novo cultivar of Coffea arabica. Leaf explants were cultivated with half the MS salt concentration and the addition of sucrose (20gL-1) and 2-iP (0; 2.5; 5; 7.5 and 10µM). The 2-iP doses of 7.5 and 10µM produced the greatest responses with respect to the percentage of explants with embryogenic structures and the size of the embryogenic structures. However, the greatest production of somatic embryos occurred on the explants treated with 10µM of 2-iP, followed by 7.5µM, whereas their production was absent or reduced with 0 and 5µM, respectively.

Key words:
Cultivar Mundo Novo; 2-iP; somatic embryos; embryogenic structures

RESUMO:

Este estudo avaliou o efeito de diferentes concentrações de 2-isopentalinadenina (2-iP) na capacidade de embriogênese somática direta da cultivar Mundo Novo de Coffea arabica. Explantes foliares foram cultivados em meio com metade da concentração de sais de MS e adição de sacarose (20gL-1) e de 2-iP (0; 2,5; 5; 7,5 e 10µM). Os tratamentos com 7,5 e 10µM de 2-iP induziram respostas mais elevadas de porcentagem de explantes com estruturas embriogênicas e de tamanho de estrutura embriogênica. Porém, os explantes tratados 10µM de 2-iP tiveram maior produção de embriões somáticos, seguido de 7,5µM, enquanto nos tratamentos controle e com 5µM, as respostas foram respectivamente de ausência e de baixa formação destes.

Palavras chave:
Cultivar Mundo Novo; 2-iP; embriões somáticos; estrutura embriogênica

In Brazil the culture of coffee is mainly based on planting Coffea arabica cultivars and its hybrids. However these hybrids must be vegetatively multiplied in order to preserve their differentiated characteristics (NONGDAM, 2016NONGDAM, P. Development of synthetic seed technology in plants and its applications: A Review. International Journal Current Science, v.19, n.4, p.86-101, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://www.currentsciencejournal.info/issuespdf/Nongdam.pdf >. Accessed: Sep. 09, 2017.
http://www.currentsciencejournal.info/is...
) which can be done by somatic embryogenesis.

Somatic embryogenesis produces somatic embryos as from haploid or diploid cells without fusion of the gametes (von ARNOLD et al., 2002von ARNOLD, S. et al. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, v.69, p.233-249, 2002. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015673200621 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015673200621...
). This process can occur by direct or indirect via. The indirect via occurs in two phases, first calogenesis followed by the initiation of somatic embryos as from callus. Direct somatic embryogenesis occurs in a single step, without calogenesis, the embryos forming directly from determined cells and pre-embryogenic parts situated in regions on the explant edges (WILLIAMS & MAHESWARAN, 1986WILLIAMS, E.G.; MAHESWARAN, G. Somatic embryogenesis: factors influencing coordinated behaviour of cells as an embryogenic group. Annals of Botany, v.57, p.443-462, 1986. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087127 >. Accessed: Jul. 07, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.a...
).

C. arabica genotypes can be multiplied by indirect (ALMEIDA et al., 2008ALMEIDA, J.A.S. et al. Embriogênese somática em genótipos de Coffea arabica L. Coffee Science, v.3, n.2, p.143-151, 2008. Available from: <Available from: http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/85/173 >. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2013.
http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.p...
) or direct (ALMEIDA & SILVAROLLA, 2009ALMEIDA, J.A.S.; SILVAROLLA, M.B. Induction of somatic embryos of Coffea arabica genotypes by 6-Benzyladenine. International Journal of Plant Developmental Biology, v.3, n.1, p.5-8, 2009. Available from: <Available from: http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/0906/IJPDB_3(1)/IJPDB_3(1)5-9o.pdf >. Accessed: Apr. 20, 2013.
http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Onlin...
) somatic embryogenesis, or by both. However, the indirect route is usually used for the multiplication of the species C. arabica, whereas the direct route is inefficient, taking a long time and producing few embryos. NIC-CAN et al. (2015NIC-CAN, G.I. et al. Somatic embryogenesis: Identified factors that lead to embryogenic repression. A case of species of the same genus. Plos One, v.10, n.6..e0126414, 2015. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126414 >. doi: 10.1371/jornal:pone.0126414. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2017.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl...
) showed that the inefficiency of the direct route in C. arabica is associated with inhibitory substances present in the leaf explant tissues, which prevents the formation of embryos. Despite this the direct route is still of greater advantage than the indirect route, since it occurs in a single phase allowing for a reduction in consumables and manual labor, such that studies aiming to increase its efficiency are relevant.

Of the plant growth regulators, auxins and cytokinins influence the somatic embryogenesis response in the majority of species (SHARMA, 2017SHARMA, H. Role of growth regulators in micropropagation of woody plants - a review. International Journal Advances Resourch, v.5, n.2, p.2378-2385, 2017. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3421 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3421...
). However, in C. arabica explants direct somatic embryogenesis is normally unleashed by the presence of a cytokinin without the need for auxin (YASUDA et al., 1985YASUDA, T. et al. Embryogenic callus induction from Coffea arabica leaf explants by benzyladenine. Plant Cell Physiology, v.26, n.3, p.595-597, 1985. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076946 >. Accessed: Jul. 05, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.p...
). The 6-Benzyladenine is the cytokinin most frequently used to unleash the direct route in this species (YASUDA et al., 1985YASUDA, T. et al. Embryogenic callus induction from Coffea arabica leaf explants by benzyladenine. Plant Cell Physiology, v.26, n.3, p.595-597, 1985. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076946 >. Accessed: Jul. 05, 2018.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.p...
, ALMEIDA & SILVAROLLA, 2009ALMEIDA, J.A.S.; SILVAROLLA, M.B. Induction of somatic embryos of Coffea arabica genotypes by 6-Benzyladenine. International Journal of Plant Developmental Biology, v.3, n.1, p.5-8, 2009. Available from: <Available from: http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/0906/IJPDB_3(1)/IJPDB_3(1)5-9o.pdf >. Accessed: Apr. 20, 2013.
http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Onlin...
). The literature includes a few reports of the application of 2-iP for the direct route in C. arabica (GATICA-ARIAS et al., 2007GATICA-ARIAS, A.M. et al. Comparison of three in vitro protocols for direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Coffea arabica L. cvs. Caturra and Catuaí. Agronomia Costarricense, v.31, n.1, p.85-94, 2007. Available from: <Available from: http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v31n01_085.pdf >. Accessed: Jun 04, 2018.
http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v31n01_085....
; KAHIA et al., 2016KAHIA, J. et al. High-frequency direct somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaves derived from in vitro germinated seedlings of a Coffea arabica hybrid cultivar. HortScience, v.51, p.1148-1152, 2016. Available from: doi:10.21273/HORTSCI10771-16. Accessed: Jun. 13, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI10771-16...
). Thus the objective of this study was to verify the effect of different concentrations of the cytokinin 2-iP on direct somatic embryogenesis in leaf explants of the Mundo Novo cultivar of C. arabica.

Expanded leaves, taken from up to the third pair of branches of adult plants of the C. arabica cultivar Mundo Novo, and maintained in an experimental area of the Agronomic Institute, Campinas, Brazil, were used. After picking them, the leaves were washed in a detergent solution to remove dust, immersed in a 2% sodium hypochlorite solution for 25 minutes and then rinsed 3 times in autoclaved distilled water. They were then maintained in a moist chamber for 24 hours and then disinfested again as previously described. Rectangular 1.5x2.0cm explants were obtained from the disinfested leaves. The explants obtained were inoculated with the adaxial face in contact with the surface of the culture medium, using 30mL volumes of the culture medium contained in 200mL transparent glass flasks, maintained in the absence of light at temperature of 25ºC.

The culture medium used to induce direct somatic embryogenesis consisted of half the concentration of MS salts (MURASHIGE & SKOOG, 1962MURASHIGE, T.; SKOOG, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, v.15, n.3, p.473-497, 1962. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x >. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2017.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962...
), with the addition of 20gL-1 sucrose and the following concentrations of 2-iP: 0; 2.5; 5; 7.5 and 10µM. The same culture medium was used to germinate the embryos without the addition of plant growth regulators, maintained for 16 hours in the light, illuminated by cool white fluorescent lamps of 4.000 lux of light intensity. The pH of the culture media was adjusted to 5.8, jellified with 5gL-1 of agar and it was autoclaved at 121ºC and 1.5atm for twenty minutes. The experiment was set up in an entirely randomized design, each treatment consisted of fifteen replicates, using one explant in each. Treatments were evaluated monthly with respect to the number of explants showing the formation of embryogenic structures, estimate of the size of the embryogenic structures and the number of somatic embryos formed. Embryogenic structure corresponds to a mass of tissue developed on the foliar explant edges. Size of the embryogenic structure was estimated indirectly with the aid of a ruler. The data were submitted to regression using the SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 8.3).

Explants from the cultivar Mundo Novo showed the capacity for direct somatic embryogenesis which was unleashed in the majority of the treatments with 2-iP, forming embryogenic structures (Figure 1A) and somatic embryos (Figure 1B) on the explant edges in a single culture medium, and they were formed on both green and oxidized explants.

Figure 1
Leaf explants of the Mundo Novo cultivar of C. arabica cultivated in culture medium inducing direct somatic embryogenesis supplemented with 10 µM 2-iP, temperature at 25ºC, in the absence of light. Bars= 1 cm. A- The embryogenic structure (arrow) formed at the edge of the explant, at 90 days of cultive. B- Somatic embryos at diferente stages of development on the surface of the embryogenic structure (arrow), at 150 days of the cultive.

Explants formed embryogenic structures in all the treatments with 2-iP, except for the control (Figure 2A). Using a dose of 2.5µM the number of explants forming embryogenic structures was close to 20% during the experiment, and this response practically doubled in the treatment with 5µM, reaching about 40% by the end of the experiment. Conversely, treating with 7.5 and 10µM caused a significant increase in responses of explants, almost 80% forming embryogenic structures as from 30 days after starting the experiment. Besides, it was shown that the size of these structures also varied according to the 2-iP dose (Figure 2B). The treatments with 2.5 and 5µM resulted in structures of 0.1 and 0.5mm, respectively, in all the evaluations, whereas after 30 days, the structures resulting from the treatments with 7.5 and 10µM were of 0.5mm, reaching 0.9 and 1mm, respectively, at the end of the experiment. It should be pointed out that; although, the embryogenic structures were small and produced in small numbers on the edges of the explants, they were relevant since they could form embryos on their surfaces, which contributed to the efficiency of the direct route with C. arabica explants.

Figure 2
Curves of leaf explants responses of the Mundo Novo cultivar of C. arabica cultivated in culture medium inducing direct somatic embryogenesis with the addition of different concentrations of 2-iP (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10µM), at temperature 25ºC in the absence of light. A. Percentage of embryogenic structures, B. Size of embryogenic structure and C. Number of somatic embryos.

With respect to embryo formation, it can be seen that this also varied according to the 2-iP concentration (Figure 2C). In the treatments with 0 and 2.5µM the explants did not form embryos and production was low with 5µM, reaching a total of 40 at the end of the evaluations. The treatment with 7.5µM caused a gradual increase in embryo production, starting with 20 in the first 30 days and reaching 62 at the end of the experiment. Conversely, the greatest embryo production was reported with 10µM, forming 22 after 30 days of cultivation, which increased to 60 in the second evaluation and reached over 100 after 90 days.

Results indicated that the explant cells were more sensitive to 2-iP concentrations equal or greater to 5µM with respect to embryo formation. Thus the efficiency of the direct route with C. arabica explants as a response to the treatment with 10µM of 2-iP showed that this was the more adequate condition, with a greater production of embryos than with the lower doses. It was also observed that for the majority of treatments, each monthly evaluation carried out showed the formation of new embryos, indicating that the embryogenesis competence acquired by the cells at the start of the treatment was preserved for a long time. In addition, the responses of the absence or limited embryo formation could also be related to the possible presence of substances that inhibit somatic embryogenesis in leaf explants of this species, according to the results of NIC CAM et al. (2015)NIC-CAN, G.I. et al. Somatic embryogenesis: Identified factors that lead to embryogenic repression. A case of species of the same genus. Plos One, v.10, n.6..e0126414, 2015. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126414 >. doi: 10.1371/jornal:pone.0126414. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2017.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/articl...
, suggesting that higher 2-iP concentrations might interfere with the action of these inhibitors, favoring an increase in the production of somatic embryos and the formation of larger embryogenic structures. According to HILL & SCHALLER (2013HILL, K., SCHALLER, G.E. Enhancing plant regeneration in tissue culture: A molecular approach through manipulation of cytokinin sensitivity. Plant Signaling Behavior, v.8, n.10, e25709, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.25709 >. Accessed: Dec. 9, 2017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.25709...
), explants that accumulate high endogenous levels of cytokinins tend to be more responsive to treatment with exogenous cytokinins. Natural differences in the ability to synthesize and respond to cytokinins appear to have a significant role in the capacity for in vitro regeneration. Finally the results obtained reinforce the prominent influence of the cytokinins in unleashing the direct route in C. arabica leaf explants.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the Consórcio de Pesquisa Café (Code of the Action Plan: 02.09.20.101.00.05) for scholarships and the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), (Process: 11/10090-1).

REFERENCES:

  • ALMEIDA, J.A.S.; SILVAROLLA, M.B. Induction of somatic embryos of Coffea arabica genotypes by 6-Benzyladenine. International Journal of Plant Developmental Biology, v.3, n.1, p.5-8, 2009. Available from: <Available from: http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/0906/IJPDB_3(1)/IJPDB_3(1)5-9o.pdf >. Accessed: Apr. 20, 2013.
    » http://www.globalsciencebooks.info/Online/GSBOnline/images/0906/IJPDB_3(1)/IJPDB_3(1)5-9o.pdf
  • ALMEIDA, J.A.S. et al. Embriogênese somática em genótipos de Coffea arabica L. Coffee Science, v.3, n.2, p.143-151, 2008. Available from: <Available from: http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/85/173 >. Accessed: Apr. 18, 2013.
    » http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/85/173
  • GATICA-ARIAS, A.M. et al. Comparison of three in vitro protocols for direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Coffea arabica L. cvs. Caturra and Catuaí. Agronomia Costarricense, v.31, n.1, p.85-94, 2007. Available from: <Available from: http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v31n01_085.pdf >. Accessed: Jun 04, 2018.
    » http://www.mag.go.cr/rev_agr/v31n01_085.pdf
  • KAHIA, J. et al. High-frequency direct somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from leaves derived from in vitro germinated seedlings of a Coffea arabica hybrid cultivar. HortScience, v.51, p.1148-1152, 2016. Available from: doi:10.21273/HORTSCI10771-16. Accessed: Jun. 13, 2017.
    » https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI10771-16
  • HILL, K., SCHALLER, G.E. Enhancing plant regeneration in tissue culture: A molecular approach through manipulation of cytokinin sensitivity. Plant Signaling Behavior, v.8, n.10, e25709, 2013. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.25709 >. Accessed: Dec. 9, 2017.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/psb.25709
  • MURASHIGE, T.; SKOOG, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, v.15, n.3, p.473-497, 1962. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x >. Accessed: Dec. 13, 2017.
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  • NIC-CAN, G.I. et al. Somatic embryogenesis: Identified factors that lead to embryogenic repression. A case of species of the same genus. Plos One, v.10, n.6..e0126414, 2015. Available from: <Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126414 >. doi: 10.1371/jornal:pone.0126414. Accessed: Dec. 14, 2017.
    » https://doi.org/10.1371/jornal:pone.0126414» https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126414
  • NONGDAM, P. Development of synthetic seed technology in plants and its applications: A Review. International Journal Current Science, v.19, n.4, p.86-101, 2016. Available from: <Available from: http://www.currentsciencejournal.info/issuespdf/Nongdam.pdf >. Accessed: Sep. 09, 2017.
    » http://www.currentsciencejournal.info/issuespdf/Nongdam.pdf
  • SHARMA, H. Role of growth regulators in micropropagation of woody plants - a review. International Journal Advances Resourch, v.5, n.2, p.2378-2385, 2017. Available from: <Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3421 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2017.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3421
  • von ARNOLD, S. et al. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, v.69, p.233-249, 2002. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015673200621 >. Accessed: Jun. 10, 2017.
    » https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015673200621
  • YASUDA, T. et al. Embryogenic callus induction from Coffea arabica leaf explants by benzyladenine. Plant Cell Physiology, v.26, n.3, p.595-597, 1985. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076946 >. Accessed: Jul. 05, 2018.
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a076946
  • WILLIAMS, E.G.; MAHESWARAN, G. Somatic embryogenesis: factors influencing coordinated behaviour of cells as an embryogenic group. Annals of Botany, v.57, p.443-462, 1986. Available from: <Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087127 >. Accessed: Jul. 07, 2018.
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087127
  • 0
    CR-2018-0001.R1

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2018

History

  • Received
    02 Jan 2018
  • Accepted
    04 Oct 2018
  • Reviewed
    31 Oct 2018
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br