Occurrence and abundance of a mariner-like element in freshwater and terrestrial planarians (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida) from southern Brazil

Abstract

Transposable elements are DNA sequences present in all the large phylogenetic groups, both capable of changing position within the genome and constituting a significant part of eukaryotic genomes. The mariner family of transposons is one of the few which occurs in a wide variety of taxonomic groups, including freshwater planarians. Nevertheless, so far only five planarian species have been reported to carry mariner-like elements (MLEs), although several different species have been investigated. Regarding the number of copies of MLEs, Girardia tigrina is the only planarian species in which this has been evaluated, with an estimation of 8,000 copies of the element per haploid genome. Preliminary results obtained in our laboratory demonstrated that MLE is found in a large number of different species of planarians, including terrestrial. With this in mind, the aim was to evaluate the occurrence and estimate the number of MLE copies in different planarian species collected in south Brazil. Twenty-eight individuals from 15 planarian species were analyzed. By using PCR and the hybridization of nucleic acids, it was found that MLE was present in all the analyzed species, the number of copies being high, probably over 10³ per haploid genome.

mariner; planarian; transposable element; transposons

ANIMAL GENETICS

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Occurrence and abundance of a mariner-like element in freshwater and terrestrial planarians (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida) from southern Brazil

Fernanda Sperb; Desirée Cigaran Schuck; Jaqueline Josi Samá Rodrigues

Laboratório de Biologia Molecular, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo, RS, Brazil

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

Transposable elements are DNA sequences present in all the large phylogenetic groups, both capable of changing position within the genome and constituting a significant part of eukaryotic genomes. The mariner family of transposons is one of the few which occurs in a wide variety of taxonomic groups, including freshwater planarians. Nevertheless, so far only five planarian species have been reported to carry mariner-like elements (MLEs), although several different species have been investigated. Regarding the number of copies of MLEs, Girardia tigrina is the only planarian species in which this has been evaluated, with an estimation of 8,000 copies of the element per haploid genome. Preliminary results obtained in our laboratory demonstrated that MLE is found in a large number of different species of planarians, including terrestrial. With this in mind, the aim was to evaluate the occurrence and estimate the number of MLE copies in different planarian species collected in south Brazil. Twenty-eight individuals from 15 planarian species were analyzed. By using PCR and the hybridization of nucleic acids, it was found that MLE was present in all the analyzed species, the number of copies being high, probably over 10³ per haploid genome.

Key words:mariner, planarian, transposable element, transposons.

Introduction

Transposable elements are DNA sequences capable of changing their position within the genome, and which constitute a significant part of eukaryotic genetic material. The mariner family is a diverse and taxonomically widespread group of Class II transposable elements, characterized by possessing inverted terminal repeats flanking their sequences and through codifying a transposase which presents the D,D(34)D motif in its catalytic domain (Figure 1). The transposition of this element takes place by using the conservative "cut-and-paste" mechanism (reviewed in Hartl et al., 1997a). All the transposition steps are executed by this transposase, this being sufficient for element mobility since there is no need for host factors (Lampe et al., 1999; Tosi and Beverley, 2000). Mariner-like elements (MLEs) have been classified into 13 different subfamilies, according to nucleotide sequence similarities, and can coexist within one and the same genome (Robertson and MacLeod, 1993; Hartl et al., 1997b; Robertson, 1997; Kumaresan and Mathavan, 2004; Zakharkin et al., 2004). The five major subfamilies are: capitata, cecropia, irritans, mauritiana and mellifera (Lampe et al., 2001). Sequence identity among members of these different subfamilies ranges from 40 to 56% for DNA and 23 to 45% for amino acids (Robertson, 1993).

The assignment of each sequence to a particular subfamily is generally unambiguous. Phylogenetic analysis results in the division of sequences into the same groupings, thereby reinforcing the confidence in assigning these to particular subfamilies and in their reality as being evolutionarily distinct clades (Robertson and MacLeod, 1993).

Mariner family elements were first described in Drosophila mauritiana as being an insertion of the white gene (Jacobson and Hartl, 1985). Since then, they have been identified in plants, fungi, vertebrate animals including man, nematodes, several insect orders and other arthropods (Bigot et al., 1994; Auge-Gouillou et al., 1995; Robertson, 1995; Smit and Riggs, 1996; Robertson, 1997; Plasterk et al., 1999; Feschotte and Wessler, 2002). MLEs have already been identified in five species of the phylum Platyhelminthes, all sequences having been deposited in GenBank at NCBI. Four of these belong to the planarian group (Garcia-Fernàndez et al., 1995; Robertson, 1997; Alvarado et al., 2002). On studying10 species of freshwater planarians, Garcia-Fernàndez et al. (1995) were able to identify an MLE only in Girardia tigrina, with an estimated 8,000 copies of the element per haploid genome. Nevertheless, they did not encounter this element in the phylogenetically very close species Schmidtea mediterranea, whereas more recently, Alvarado et al. (2002) did. Robertson (1997) also detected the presence of MLE in G. tigrina, as well as in the two species of marine planarians Bdelloura candida and Stylochus zebra. These results raised the question of the presence of this element in planarians where sporadic distribution among related species can also be observed. The mariner family as a whole can be transmitted horizontally between reproductively isolated or phylogenetically unrelated species, as is the case of other transposable elements. This possibility explains the sporadic distribution of this transposon and the great similarity in mariner sequences found in species from very different phyla (Robertson, 1993; Robertson and MacLeod, 1993; Garcia-Fernàndez et al., 1995; and Schuck, 2004, Undergraduate Thesis, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo).

Starting with the casual identification in our laboratory of an MLE in Girardia schubarti, we decided to investigate the presence of this element in other planarian species by using such techniques as PCR, Southern Blot, and the hybridization of genomic DNA in the dot blot. Furthermore, the dot blot was also used to estimate the copy number rate per haploid genome of several species.

Material and Methods

Species and DNA extraction

In this study, twenty-eight individuals from 15 planarian species and from several locales in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (southern Brazil) were analyzed, these being the terrestrial planarians Choeradoplana sp., C. iheringi, Choeradoplana sp. 249, Geoplana sp. 1759, G. franciscana, G josefi, G. ladislavii, Notogynaphallia abundans, N. ciciliae, N. maginata sensu graffi and Pasipha sp., and the freshwater ones Girardia anderlani, G. biapertura, G. schubarti and G. tigrina (Table 1). All the freshwater specimens had been collected over the previous 20 years, having been kept in the laboratory at the Institute for Planarian Research (UNISINOS). Prior to DNA extraction, all the individuals were starved during one week. The DNA was extracted by proteinase K, SDS and phenol-chloroform, using standard procedures (Sambrook and Russell, 2001).

PCR amplification

PCR was performed on 100 ng of genomic DNA from each tested individual. The degenerate primers had been established beforehand by Robertson (1993), based on the two conserved motifs of the mariner transposase, WVPHEL (forward) and YSPDLAP (reverse) (Figure 1). They were termed MAR124F (5' TGGGTNCCNCAYG ARYT 3') and MAR276R (5' GGNGCNARRTCNGGN WSRTA 3'), respectively. A 30 µL-reaction included 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.2 mM dNTP, 0.8 µM of each primer and 1 unit of Taq polymerase. After an initial denaturation for 2 min at 95 °C, the PCR condition consisted of 30 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 95 °C, 1 min annealing at 50 °C and 1 min extension at 72 °C, followed by an extra 5 min extension at 72 °C. The predicted size of the PCR products was approximately 500 bp.

In order to identify the two different mariner subfamilies mellifera and cecropia, semi-nested PCRs were performed using three reverse primers separately combined with an MAR124F primer (for primer localization, see Figure 1). The MELLIFERA (5' ATNCCYTTRTARTCCC ACCA 3') primer was used for the mellifera subfamily, and both CECROPIA (5' TARTGNAYNACNCCNGC 3') and TIGRINA (5' TARTGDATNACNCCRTA 3') for the cecropia. MELLIFERA and CECROPIA primers had already been designed and tested by Robertson (1993) as MAR124F and MAR276R primers, the former being specific for amplifying these two subfamilies. We ourselves designed the TIGRINA primer based on sequence results of Garcia-Fernàndez et al. (1995) for Girardia tigrina, with the intention of reducing CECROPIA primer degeneracy. 2 µL of the MAR124F/MAR276R PCR amplification were used for each semi-nested PCR, under the same reaction and cycling conditions as described above. The expected size of the semi-nested products was 250 bp approximately.

Southern and dot blot

PCR and semi-nested PCR products of all individuals were subjected to gel electrophoresis in 1% agarose and transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond N⁺, GE Healthcare) after denaturation.

For estimation of the number of MLE copies from the cecropia subfamily, we chose 20 individuals from the total analyzed by Southern blot (28), and blotted their genomic DNA onto a Hybond N⁺ membrane using a vacuum manifold (Gibco-BRL). Firstly, all DNAs were visually quantified in a UV transilluminator from several different dilutions electrophoresed on 0.8% ethidium bromide stained agarose gels. Following this first estimate, the concentration of all samples was adjusted to 50 ng/µL and further quantified for greater accuracy. DNA samples were then diluted with a TE (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8) buffer, in order to obtain the amounts of 800, 400, 200 and 100 ng of genomic DNA in a volume of 20 µL. Each 20 µL of the sample was denatured at 95 °C for 5 min and immediately blotted onto the nylon membrane. For five individuals, fewer dilutions were prepared due to limitations in available DNA.

The membranes were hybridized to a random primer fluorescein labeled probe at 60 °C. The final washing was at 60 °C with 0.5 X SSC, 0.1% SDS. Hybridization and detection were undertaken using a Gene Images Kit (GE Healthcare), according to manufacturer's instructions. A 0.3 kb PCR product containing the central part of a MLE, in which the beginning is from the coding sequence for the WVPHEL conserved motif, was used as a probe. This product was obtained by PCR amplification, using M13 forward and reverse primers from a clone previously produced in our laboratory (Schuck, 2004, Undergraduate Thesis, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo), and containing a MLE cecropia subfamily from Girardia schubarti inserted into the pGEM T-Easy vector (Promega). After amplification, the product was gel purified using a Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System Kit (Promega) before labeling.

1D Image Analysis software version 2.0.3 (Eastman Kodak Company) was used to evaluate the intensity of the hybridization signal and estimate the abundance of MLEs. The estimate was standardized by hybridization signals from 5 ng, 1 ng, 100 pg and 10 pg of the 0.3 kb fragment used as a probe, and by assuming that the complete MLE (one copy) in the genome has 1.3 kb. The assumed size of the Girardia tigrina haploid genome was 1.4 x 10⁹ bp, as defined by flow cytometry and reported by J. Baguña (Animal Genome Size Database). We used this value to extrapolate the size of the haploid genome in the other species according to the number of chromosomes each presented.

Karyotyping

In order to confirm the haploid number of chromosomes in various species, so as to adjust the estimate of the number of copies of MLE per haploid genome, we karyotyped three individuals of both Girardia schubarti and G. tigrina species from clonal populations. Ten mitotic cells from each individual were analyzed to determine the ploidy level. Karyotypes were derived from regenerated blastemas according to a modified Hochberg and Erdtmann (1988) protocol. Three days after feeding, the planarians were cut up and then left for three days to regenerate. After colchicine treatment (0.2% for 3 h at room temperature), the tissue was hypotonically shocked in a 75 mM KCl solution containing 2-6 drops of a 0.03% trypsin solution, and then fixed in a glacial acetic acid/methanol solution (1:3). A 10% Giemsa solution was used for chromosome staining. Slides were examined and photographed through a Zeiss Axioskop microscope.

We used data from Benya et al. (2007) and Knakievicz et al. (2007) for the chromosome numbers of G. anderlani and from Benya et al. (2007) for G.biapertura, since these researchers had karyotyped individuals from the same clonal populations we have worked, as well as for G. schubarti and G. tigrina.

Results

MLE occurrence

Twenty-eight specimens from 15 species of planarians (four freshwater and 11 terrestrial types) were analyzed by the dot blot and/or PCR and Southern blot techniques to detect the presence of MLEs. The species were collected at six different locales. All the species analyzed, as well as all the collection sites, manifested positive results as to the presence of a MLE in at least one of the techniques employed (Table 2).

After amplification with the MAR124F/MAR276R primers, all the freshwater species analyzed (Girardia anderlani, G. biapertura, G. schubarti and G. tigrina), besides two of the terrestrial species (Choeradoplana iheringi and Geoplana ladislavii), presented visible amplification products of the expected size in agarose gel. The hybridization of these PCR products confirmed the same positive result for all the freshwater species. Although amplification occurred in only two terrestrial species, as stated, hybridization was positive this also being the case of two others - Geoplana josefi and Notogynaphallia maginata sensu graffi.

Apart from G.tigrina, amplification with MAR124F/MELLIFERA primers presented positive results, both for all the species analyzed and for the great majority of specimens. The quantity of products was greater, mainly in the freshwater species, but also for the terrestrial species Choeradoplana sp. (CspAS) and C. iheringi 2 (Ci2AS). The same result was obtained in the hybridization of PCR products from the terrestrial species. The two individuals that did not present amplification products (Gj2AS and GtGr) also showed no signs of hybridization.

As regards the primer pair MAR124F/TIGRINA which amplifies elements of the cecropia subfamily, very weak amplification was observed in only six individuals belonging to the terrestrial species C. iheringi, N. abundans, N. ciciliae and N. maginata sensu graffi. Hybridization was, however, positive for fourteen of the nineteen specimens analyzed. Amongst the freshwater species all the specimens were positive for both amplification and hybridization. Only in the terrestrial species Geoplana sp. 1759 and Pasipha sp. were results unpositive for the presence of cecropia, and this when using the TIGRINA primer in the semi-nested PCR.

As a result of amplification with the MAR124F/CECROPIA primers, which, as is the case of TIGRINA, are also used to identify the cecropia subfamily, we observed positive results only for specimens of C. iheringi among the terrestrial species. Hybridization was positive, however, for twelve of the nineteen analyzed and belonging to seven different species. When using this technique (semi-nested PCR followed by hybridization), only Geoplana sp. 1759 and Pasipha sp. were negative for occurrence of the cecropia subfamily. Results, when using both pairs of primers for identifying this subfamily in the terrestrial species, were very similar, the only difference being the positive hybridization signal observed in Geoplana franciscana and G. ladislavii, and this when using only the TIGRINA primer. Among the freshwater species, all the specimens presented amplification products visible in gel, except for G. tigrina from Gramado (GtGr), although all were positive for hybridization.

As a rule we observed that in the freshwater species, and when using different primer pairs, there was an improvement in amplification and hybridization signals were more pronounced, when compared with the terrestrial species (Table 2). Of all the primer pairs, MAR124F/MELLIFERA produced the best results for amplification, although hybridization was more intense for products of the cecropia subfamily, which is explained by our using a cecropia probe and highly stringent conditions.

The Geoplana ladislavii species was the only one to present wider amplification bands and hybridization signals with MAR124F/MAR276R primers than with those specific for subfamilies. These results were contrary to what was observed with the remaining species, which presented bands and signals that were identical or more intense for at least one of the subfamilies with specific rather than MAR124F/MAR276R primers.

We observed differences among specimens of G.josefi, all from the same location. Hybridization occurred with the MAR124F/MAR276R product in only one of the five specimens analyzed (Gj2AS), although neither amplification nor hybridization with the other primers was observed. Two of the three analyzed specimens from São Francisco de Paula (Gj3SF and Gj5SF) presented hybridization with primer products which amplified the cecropia subfamily, whereas the third (Gj4SF) presented no positive signal for this subfamily. Nevertheless, the presence of the mellifera subfamily was identified in all the three. In the case of the specimen of Girardia anderlani from the same locale (São Francisco de Paula), we found amplification and hybridization with the products from all the primer pairs used.

cecropia MLE copy number rate per haploid genome

In order to evaluate ploidy and establish its relationship with estimates of the number of copies of the MLE per haploid genome, the karyotypes of two specimens were analyzed, one from the species Girardia schubarti and the other from G. tigrina. Thus, it was possible to confirm the number of chromosomes in the lineages analyzed and already described in previous works (Benya et al., 2007; Knakievicz et al., 2007).

Regarding G. schubarti, we observed eight chromosomes per cell in all the slides and sixteen in G tigrina (Figure 2), from which it was assumed that n = 4 and n = 8 were the respective sizes of the haploid genomes for the other specimens of these two species when calculating the number of copies per haploid genome (for n = 4 and n = 8 the genome size is around 0.7 x 10⁹ and 1.4 x 10⁹ bp, respectively). In the case of G. anderlani, we considered n = 9, as previously described by Benya et al. (2007) and Knakievicz et al. (2007), and the same for G. biapertura, as described by Benya et al. (2007) (for n = 9, the genome size is around 1.6 x 10⁹ bp). The presence of MLEs in the 15 species analyzed was confirmed by hybridization in all the 20 samples analyzed by dot blot (data not shown). As to the freshwater species, which, besides having a known karyotype, were considered as diploids, the difference in intensity of the hybridization signal was used to estimate a rate for the number of cecropia subfamily mariner copies. We observed a wide range within the genus Girardia- G. biapertura, with an extremely high number of copies, about 3 x 10⁴, and, on the other hand, G. schubarti from Constantina (Gs5Co) with about 10³ copies per haploid genome. Nevertheless, most Girardia species presented a rate of 10⁴.

These results were obtained when considering diploid freshwater planarian individuals/populations. However, when we estimated the number of copies considering 3n individuals, the same rate of 10³ to 10⁴ copies was maintained.

There are no reports published on terrestrial planarian karyotypes. In an attempt to infer the approximate number of cecropia MLE, we assumed n = 8 (haploid genome size = 1.4 x 10⁹ bp), since it is the most frequently observed chromosome number per haploid genome for both freshwater and terrestrial triclads from Rio Grande do Sul (A.M. Leal-Zanchet, personal communication). So, according to this assumption, we deduced that, as for Girardia biapertura, Choeradoplana sp. 249 also presented an extremely high number of cecropia MLE copies, with about 3 x 10⁴, whereas Geoplana ladislavii, N. abundans and N. maginata sensu graffi from São Francisco de Paula presented a little more than 4 x 10³. The other species of the genus Choeradoplana, C. iheringi and Choeradoplana sp., together with N. ciciliae and N. maginata sensu graffi from Aparados da Serra, and Geoplana josefi, presented a rate of 10⁴.

Discussion

All the planarian species analyzed herein presented positive results for the presence of the mariner-like element. This is the first report on MLE in terrestrial planarians, the results implying that MLEs are widely distributed in triclads. In contrast, Garcia-Fernàndez et al. (1995) analyzed 10 species of planarians and detected MLEs only in Girardia tigrina, this leading them to suggest that this was one of the few species in the group to present the element. We believe that a possible cause for the absence of PCR amplification in the species analyzed by said authors is their use of primers based on the sequence of inverted terminal repeats, which they had found in the MLE from G. tigrina and belonging to the cecropia subfamily. It is known that these sequences may present wide variability within and among subfamilies (Bigot et al., 2005), and with the PCR technique it is always possible that the primers do not anneal due to certain variation in the sequence of the organism in question. Furthermore, in the case of planarians, the excess of polysaccharides in the mucus may interfere with the efficiency of amplification (Ausubel et al., 1994; Angeles et al., 2005).

Robertson (1997), the author who had previously established the MAR124F/MAR276R primer pair for identifying the mariner-like element based on very conservative motifs (Robertson, 1993), obtained positive results from the analysis of G. tigrina, Stylochus zebra and Bdelloura candida planarians. These primers have been widely used for the most diverse organisms (Robertson, 1993, 1997; Robertson and MacLeod, 1993; Augé-Gouillou et al., 1995; Kumaresan and Mathavan, 2004), the results demonstrating that they are both reliable and do not promote false-positive amplifications. Therefore, although we did not sequence the PCR products, the proven reliability of MAR124F/MAR 276R primers and the hybridization of the samples with the cecropia probe under highly stringent conditions, allowed us to assume that the amplification products and the hybridization signals did, in fact, represent MLEs in the genome of the individuals analyzed.

Unlike freshwater species, most terrestrial species did not express amplification with MAR124F/MAR 276R primers. As mentioned beforehand, the absence of amplification could be due to the poor quality of the DNA. The samples of terrestrial species, especially from the genera Geoplana and Pasipha, were considerably viscous. Another possible, more reasonable explanation for the absence of amplification may be the lesser homology of the MAR276R reverse primer with the terrestrial species, seeing that, as a result of amplification with reverse primers specific for the mellifera and cecropia subfamilies, all the samples presented positive results for one or both. The greatest discrepancy in results was found in Gj2AS, which presented positive hybridization with the products from MAR124F/MAR276R primers, but manifested neither hybridization nor amplification for the two subfamilies analyzed, in spite of the positive dot blot signal. This suggests that the element present in this individual is similar to cecropia but with a divergence in the sequence of nucleotides in the annealing region of the specific primers.

On analyzing the results of subfamilies, we observed that only two species, Geoplana sp. 1759 and Pasipha sp., were positive only for the mellifera subfamily. This result was also found for two of the Geoplana josefi specimens analyzed (Gj1AS and Gj4SF), in spite of the presence of the cecropia subfamily having been identified in the other two specimens of this same species from São Francisco de Paula (Gj3SF and Gj5SF). Furthermore, only cecropia was found in Girardia tigrina from Gramado (GtGr). In all the other species, results were positive for the presence of the two subfamilies under investigation (conclusions for mellifera were arrived at based only on specific semi-nested PCR and weak hybridization with a cecropia probe). These results indicate the presence of these subfamilies in the positive cases, but do not exclude the possibility that a larger number of MLEs exists, including those belonging to other subfamilies. The identity of sequences in different subfamilies is 40%-56% at the DNA level and 23%-45% in amino acids (Robertson, 1993). This probably explains the low intensity of hybridization of the probe with amplification products of the mellifera subfamily, notwithstanding the large quantity of product visible in gel. On the other hand, products for the cecropia subfamily in small quantities or not even at all visible (in most of the terrestrial species), gave signs of intense hybridization. Thus, it is possible that other MLE subfamilies could be present in these planarians, since we probed only those genomes with cecropia and used stringent hybridization conditions.

Elements of the mariner family have considerable capability for occupying one and the same genome with more than one subfamily. In some cases up to nine distinct types of mariner have been observed in a single genome (Lampe et al., 2001). The subfamilies most frequently found are cecropia, mauritiana, mellifera, irritans and capitata (Robertson and MacLeod, 1993). Robertson (1997) identified clones belonging to several subfamilies in G. tigrina- cecropia, mellifera, mauritiana, capitata and lineate -. This confirmed what we ourselves found for this species on considering the two subfamilies we analyzed.

An estimate of the number of copies of cecropia MLEs varied from 10³ to 10⁴ per haploid genome of the species analyzed. Considering the high stringency conditions for hybridization when using a cecropia probe, it is possible that these values are underestimated for the mariner family, since elements other than those of the cecropia subfamily could also be present. On the other hand, assuming that all analyzed individuals were diploids, although they could be polyploids, we may be overestimating the number of cecropia copies per haploid genome, seeing that these individuals may present some of the chromosomal variations usually described for this group. However, the change from diploid to triploid for example, the most common situation encountered, does not alter the 10³ to 10⁴ variation rate.

It is important to point out that, even though the dot blot is still being used to determine the copy number of transposable elements (Zakharkin et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2008; Sun et al. 2008), we recognize this to be a limited technique, and thus there is the possibility of under- or over-estimating. Nevertheless, even taking this limitation into consideration, the intensity of hybridization signals was high enough to assert that we have found a higher number of mariner copies in a planarian group than has ever been reported before.

Eight thousand copies per haploid genome have been reported for the species G. tigrina, which is considered to be a high number, covering approximately 0.7% of its genome (Garcia-Fernàndez et al., 1995). In our results, we observed the presence of 13,000 to 18,000 copies in the same species, a higher number than any previously reported, and which represents approximately twice the percentage of the described genome. This value, considered high by Garcia-Fernàndez et al. (1995), ended up by being contrasted with the much higher value we found for Choeradoplana sp. 249 and Girardia biapertura, in which around 3 x 10⁴ copies were estimated for their genomes. This number is only exceeded by the 44,000 mariner copies estimated for the genome of the insect Forficula auricularia (Barry et al., 2004).

From our results, we concluded that, with the exception of Geoplana sp. 1759 and Pasipha sp., at least two subfamilies were present in the planarian genomes analyzed, and that the majority of the individuals analyzed presented a large number of copies. Jacobson et al. (1986) suggest that the transposition mechanism in species that present large numbers of copies, such as G. tigrina, is similar to the Mos factor of Drosophila mauritiana, which is capable of inducing not only its own transposition, but also that of other mariner elements belonging to other subfamilies. In human beings, 1,000 copies of the MLE have been estimated, in mice 20-50, in sheep 3,000 and in cattle 3,500 (Demattei et al., 2000). In the insect Forficula auricularia, MLEs represent 4% of its genome, with an estimated 40,000 copies. In another insect, Ochlerotatus atropalpus, between 370 and 1,200 copies of Atmar-1 and from 100 to 300 of Atmar-2 have been estimated (Zakharkin et al., 2004). These results, demonstrate, as ours do, that the number of copies varies drastically between organisms and populations.

The different number of copies and their distribution may be interpreted as a manifestation of different stages in the evolutionary history of the mariner element (Torti et al., 2000). These stages are reflected in the proliferation of the element, whereat an increase in the amount of copies occurs. This increase could cause a reduction in the transposition rate and vertical inactivation, followed by stochastic loss, thereby resulting in a reduction in the number of copies (Hartl et al., 1997b). Lohe et al. (1995), when performing the Southern blot with the DNA of various groups of Drosophilae, reported that the signal observed in the hybridization of Drosophila ananassae was stronger than expected, since the probe was a fragment of a species belonging to another group of the same genus, D. erecta, which is at a certain evolutionary distance. From these results, they suggested that this would be a strong indicator of sequence similarity, thereby representing a case of horizontal transmission. Our finding of a strong hybridization signal in the dot blot for some terrestrial species such as those of the genera Choeradoplana and Notogynaphallia, which belong to an infra-order different from the one we used the probe on, is a stimulus for us to continue looking for evidence that can give support to the idea of horizontal transmission for the mariner element, as is suggested by several authors (Robertson and MacLeod, 1993; Lohe et al., 1995; Hartl et al., 1997a; Robertson, 1997), although it is not known how this transmission occurs.

From the present study, we concluded that the occurrence of MLEs is widespread in the triclad group, as was observed in all the species analyzed, and a very high number of copies, ranging from 10³ to 10⁴, were estimated for a vast majority of the species analyzed. These results exceeded our expectations, both as to occurrence as well as numbers, and suggest that the MLE is widely distributed in the planarian group.

Acknowledgments

We are particularly grateful to Dr. Ana M. Leal-Zanchet for comments, suggestions and identification of the planarians, and to the team at the Institute for Planarian Research (UNISINOS), especially Welcy H. Santos and MSc. Vanessa dos Anjos Baptista for collecting, breeding and maintaining the animals in the laboratory. We are also indebted to Dr. Tanise Knakievicz for help in preparing the chromosomes, and to Dr. Victor Hugo Valiati and Dr. Élgion L.S. Loreto for helpful discussions. This research was supported by FAPERGS (PROADE 01/0223.1; PROGENESUL 02/0484.1) and UNISINOS. Scholarship students F. Sperb and D.C. Schuck were respectively assisted by PIBIC/CNPq and UNIBIC/UNISINOS during part of this work.

Internet Resources

Received: August 5, 2008; Accepted: April 4, 2009.

Authors' present affiliations: FS, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Centro de Terapia Gênica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; DCS, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia da Relação Patógeno-Hospedeiro, Departamento de Parasitologia, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; JJSR, Laboratório de Biotecnologia, Unidade de Novo Hamburgo, Universidade Estadual do Rio Grande do Sul, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil.

Associate Editor: Louis Bernard Klaczko

• Alvarado AS, Newmark PA, Robb SMC and Juste RB (2002) The Schmidtea mediterranea database as a molecular resource for studying Platyhelminthes, stem cells and regeneration. Development 129:5659-5665.
• Angeles JGC, Laurena AC and Tecson-Mendoza EM (2005) Extraction of genomic DNA from the lipid-, polysaccharide-, and polyphenol-rich coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) Plant Mol Biol Rep 23:297a-297i.
• Augé-Gouillou C, Bigot Y, Pollet N, Hamelin MH, Meunier-Rotival M and Periquet G (1995) Human and other mammalian genomes contain transposons of the mariner family. FEBS Lett 368:541-546.
• Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA and Struhl K (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 5300 pp.
• Barry EG, Witherspoon DJ and Lampe DJ (2004) A bacterial genetic screen identifies functional coding sequences of the insect mariner transposable element Famar1 amplified from the genome of the earwig, Forficula auricularia Genetics 166:823-833.
• Benya E, Leal-Zanchet AM, Santos WH, Hauser J and Erdtmann B (2007) Chromosome polymorphism and complements in populations of Girardia species (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Paludicola) from Southern Brazil. Braz J Biol 67:951-955.
• Bigot Y, Hamelin M, Capy P and Periquet G (1994) Mariner-like elements in hymenopteran species: Insertion site and distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3408-3412.
• Bigot Y, Brillet B and Augé-Gouillou C (2005) Conservation of palindromic and mirror motifs within inverted terminal repeats of mariner-like elements. J Mol Biol 351:108-116.
• Demattei MV, Augé-Gouillou C, Pollet N, Hamelin MH, Meunier-Rotival M and Bigot Y (2000) Features of the mammal mar 1 transposons in the human, sheep, cow, and mouse genomes and implications for their evolution. Mamm Genome 11:1111-1116.
• Feschotte C and Wessler SR (2002) Mariner-like transposases are widespread and diverse in flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:280-285.
• Garcia-Fernàndez J, Bayascas-Ramíres JR, Marfany G, Muñoz-Mármol AM, Casali A, Baguña J and Saló E (1995) High copy number of highly similar mariner-like transposons in planarian (Platyhelminthes): Evidence for a trans-phyla horizontal transfer. Mol Biol Evol 12:421-431.
• Hartl DL, Lohe AR and Lozovskaya ER (1997a) Modern thoughts on an ancyent marinere: Function, evolution, regulation. Annu Rev Genet 31:337-358.
• Hartl DL, Lozovskaya ER, Nurminsky DI and Lohe AR (1997b) What restricts the activity of mariner-like transposable elements? Trends Genet 13:197-201.
• Hochberg VBM and Erdtmann B (1988) Cytogenetical and morphological considerations on Rhamdia quelen (Pisces-Pimelotidae) - The occurrence of the B chromosomes and polymorphic NOR regions. Rev Bras Genet 11:563-576.
• Jacobson JW and Hartl DL (1985) Coupled instability of two X-linked genes in Drosophila mauritiana: Germinal and somatic mutability. Genetics 111:57-65.
• Jacobson JW, Medhora MM and Hartl DL (1986) Molecular structure of a somatically unstable transposable element in Drosophila Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8684-8688.
• Knakievicz T, Lau AH, Prá D and Erdtmann B (2007) Biogeography and karyotypes of freshwater planarians (Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Paludicola) in southern Brazil. Zool Sci 24:123-129.
• Kumaresan G and Mathavan S (2004) Molecular diversity and phylogenetic analysis of mariner-like transposons in the genome of the silkworm Bombyx mori Insect Mol Biol 13:259-271.
• Lampe DJ, Akerley BJ, Rubin EJ, Mekalanos JJ and Robertson HM (1999) Hyperactive transposase mutants of the Himar1 mariner transposon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:11428-11443.
• Lampe DJ, Walden KKO and Robertson HM (2001) Loss of transposase-DNA interaction may underly the divergence of mariner family transposable elements and the ability of more than one mariner to occupy the same genome. Mol Biol Evol 18:957-961.
• Lohe AR, Moriyama EN, Lidholm D and Hartl DL (1995) Horizontal transmission, vertical inactivation, and stochastic loss of mariner-like transposable elements. Mol Biol Evol 12:62-72.
• Ma Y, Sun H, Zhao G, Dai H, Gao X, Li H and Zhang Z (2008) Isolation and characterization of genomic retrotransposon sequences from octoploid strawberry (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.). Plant Cell Rep 27:499-507.
• Plasterk RHA, Izvák Z and Ivics Z (1999) Resident aliens. The Tc1/mariner superfamily of transposable elements. Trends Genet 15:326-332.
• Robertson HM (1993) The mariner transposable element is widespread in insects. Nature 362:241-245.
• Robertson HM (1995) The Tc1-mariner superfamily of transposons in animals. J Insect Physiol 41:99-105.
• Robertson HM (1997) Multiple mariner transposons in flatworms and hydras are related to those of insects. J Hered 88:195-201.
• Robertson HM and MacLeod EG (1993) Five major subfamilies of mariner transposable elements in insects, including the Mediterranean fruit fly, and related arthropods. Insect Mol Biol 2:125-139.
• Sambrook J and Russell D (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
• Smit AF and Riggs AD (1996) Tiggers and other DNA transposon fossils in the human genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:1443-1448.
• Sun H, Dai H, Zhao G, Ma Y, Ou CQ, Li H, Li LG and Zhang Z (2008) Genome-wide characterization of long terminal repeat-retrotransposons in apple reveals the differences in heterogeneity and copy number between Ty1-copia and Ty3-gypsy retrotransposons. J Integr Plant Biol 50:1130-1139.
• Torti C, Gomulski LM, Moralli D, Raimondi E, Robertson HM, Capy P, Gasperi G and Malacrida AR (2000) Evolution of different subfamilies of mariner elements within the medfly genome inferred from abundance and chromosomal distribution. Chromosoma 108:523-532.
• Tosi LRO and Beverley SM (2000) Cis and trans factors affecting Mos 1 mariner evolution and transposition in vitro, and its potential for functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 23:133-142.
• Zakharkin SO, Willis RL, Litvinova OV, Jinwal UK, Headley VV and Benes H (2004) Identification of two mariner-like elements in the genome of the mosquito Ochlerotatus atropalpus Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34:377-386.
• Zhao G, Zhang Z, Sun H, Li H and Dai H (2007) Isolation of Ty1-copia-like retrotransposon sequences from the apple genome by chromosome walking based on modified SiteFinding-polymerase chain reaction. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 39:675-683.
• Animal Genome Size Database, Gregory TR (2008), http://www.genomesize.com (September 28, 2008).
• NCBI - National Center for Biotechnology Information, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (September 28, 2008).

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  04 Sept 2009
• Date of issue
  2009

History

• Received
  05 Aug 2008
• Accepted
  04 Apr 2009