Genetic diversity and structure of Atta robusta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini), an endangered species endemic to the restinga ecoregion

EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Genetic diversity and structure of Atta robusta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini), an endangered species endemic to the restinga ecoregion

Evelyze Pinheiro dos Reis; Tânia Maria Fernandes Salomão; Lucio Antonio de Oliveira Campos; Mara Garcia Tavares

Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil

^{Send correspondence to}

ABSTRACT

The genetic diversity and structure of the ant Atta robusta were assessed by ISSR (inter-simple sequence repeats) in 72 colonies collected from 10 localities in the Brazilian states of Espírito Santo (48 colonies) and Rio de Janeiro (24 colonies). The ISSR pattern included 67 bands, 51 of them (76.1%) polymorphic. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed a high level (57.4%) of inter-population variation, which suggested a high degree of genetic structure that was confirmed by UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method using an arithmetic average) cluster analysis. The significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances (r = 0.64, p < 0.05) indicated isolation that reflected the distance between locations. Overall, the populations were found to be genetically divergent. This finding indicates the need for management plans to preserve and reduce the risk of extinction of A. robusta.

Keywords: endemism, endangered, ISSR, population genetics, restinga.

Introduction

The ant Atta robusta (Borgmeier, 1939) maintains a mutualistic symbiotic relationship with a fungus on which it feeds (Fowler, 1995; Currie, 2001). This species was first described as Atta sexdens robusta by Borgmeier in 1939 and later elevated to species level by Gonçalves (1942). Atta robusta has a very restricted geographic distribution, occurring only in southeastern Brazil, more precisely, in restingas in the states of Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro (Gonçalves, 1960; Teixeira et al., 2003, 2004), but not in forest ecosystems near restinga vegetation (Teixeira et al., 2003). This species is included in the Red List of Brazilian Fauna Threatened with Extinction (Machado et al., 2005) because of its endemism and dependency on vegetation (Teixeira and Schoereder, 2003) and the fragmentation of restinga environments (Rocha et al., 2007; Simon et al., 2012).

The term restinga represents a set of physiognomically distinct plant communities under marine influence (Sugiyama, 1998). Restingas are geologically recent (Quaternary) ecosystems and species that colonize them are mainly from other ecosystems such as the Atlantic Forest and Caatinga, but with phenotypic variations that differ from those expressed in their original environments (Freire, 1990). Restingas cover large areas of the coasts of the Brazilian states of Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo (Henriques et al., 1987) and have sandy soils characterized by leaching, high decomposition rates, aluminium saturation and low availability of nutrients (Lacerda et al., 1993). In this biome, nests of A. robusta are found only where there is arboreal plant cover, possibly because of the particular needs of this species, such as adequate temperature and moisture for nest development (Teixeira and Schoereder, 2003).

Despite their ecological importance, restingas are extensively occupied and exploited by humans (Galindo-Leal and Câmara, 2003; Rocha et al., 2003, 2005). Much of the area of this biome is lost annually as a result of urbanization (Rocha et al., 2007), logging, burning (Teixeira et al., 2005), tourism, cultivation and grazing. On the other hand, this biome is particularly difficult to restore because of its soil characteristics (Rocha et al., 2005) and constant human encroachment. Currently, only a small portion of restinga land is protected (Simon et al., 2012).

Although easily confounded with other pest species, A. robusta does not invade cultivated areas (Teixeira et al., 2003). However, the quantity and variety of plant material consumed by this species mean that A. robusta is important in the maintenance of restinga communities that are part of the larger Atlantic Forest biome. In this biome, A. robusta plays an important role in seed dispersal and germination, in the spatial dynamics of seedlings and in soil modification (Teixeira, 2007).

Since genetic data can contribute to species conservation and considering the importance of A. robusta in restinga biology, the goal of this study was to estimate the genetic variability and the degree of structuring in colonies of A. robusta.

Material and Methods

Biological material

Workers of A. robusta were collected at six locations in the state of Espírito Santo (48 colonies) and four in the state of Rio de Janeiro (24 colonies); all of these locations were in restingas (Figure 1 and Table 1). The ants were fixed in absolute ethanol immediately after collection. In the laboratory, the absolute alcohol was changed and the samples were stored at -80 ºC until DNA extraction.

DNA extraction and amplification

The heads and mesothoraces of A. robusta workers were used for total DNA extraction (one extraction per colony) according to the protocol described by Waldschmidt et al. (1997). Quantification and verification of the integrity of the extracted DNA were done by gel electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose. The DNA obtained was diluted to a concentration of 10 ng/L and used in amplification reactions with ISSR (inter-simple sequence repeat) primers (UBC set). Initially, 99 ISSR primers were tested using DNA from two individuals. Of these, ten (UBC 807, 809, 823, 825, 834, 840, 845, 855, 857 and 889) were selected to amplify DNA from all samples because they yielded high resolution bands and ISSR patterns that were easily distinguishable between the two individuals evaluated.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94 ºC for 3 min, followed by 39 cycles of 1 min at 92 ºC, 2 min at the primer annealing temperature (Table 2) and 2 min at 72 ºC, followed by a final extension at 72 ºC for 7 min. Amplifications were done in volumes of 25 µL that contained 0.2 µM of primer, 8 µM dNTP, 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), 1X PCR buffer and approximately 20 ng of genomic DNA. All reactions included a negative control that contained all components of the PCR except for template DNA. To ensure accurate scoring and reproducibility, the amplifications were repeated twice and the data were analyzed independently by two persons.

The PCR products and the 1 kb ladder (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels (w/v) with 0.2 µg/mL ethidium bromide immersed in 1X TBE (Tris-borate EDTA). The gels were photographed after staining.

Statistical analysis

The amplification products were coded in a binary matrix by assigning 1 for presence and 0 for absence of bands. The program Popgene version 1.32 (Yeh et al., 1999) was used to determine the percentage of polymorphic loci. A matrix with the complement of the Jaccard dissimilarity coefficient (Jaccard, 1908) was obtained and subjected to analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA; Excoffier et al., 1992), to assess intra- and inter-population diversity in two hierarchical levels, and to estimate the pairwise genetic distance between locations. The genetic distance matrix was also examined by cluster analysis using the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method using an arithmetic average) algorithm. The Mantel test was used to examine the possible correlation between geographic and genetic distances for the different locations. These analyses were done using the GENES program (Cruz, 2013).

Results

Amplification using the 10 selected ISSR primers resulted in 67 bands (an average of 6.7 bands/primer). The greatest number of bands (9) was obtained with the primers UBC 809, 840 and 857 whereas the lowest number (4) was observed for the primers UBC 807, 825 and 845. The average polymorphism among the samples was 76.1% (51 polymorphic bands) (Table 2).

The genetic distance between samples ranged from 0.04 (Marataízes and São João da Barra) to 0.78 (Aracruz and Cabo Frio) (Table 3). Two groups were identified in the cluster analysis (Figure 2): samples from Aracruz, São Mateus and Linhares, all of which were from Espírito Santo and geographically close to one another, formed the first group, while the remaining samples from Espírito Santo and Rio de Janeiro formed the second group.

The Mantel test identified a significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances (r = 0.64, p < 0.05), and AMOVA showed that most of the genetic variation (57.4%) was attributable to differences among populations (Table 4).

Discussion

Cluster analysis yielded two well-resolved groups of A. robusta, one composed only of samples from three geographically close localities in the restinga of Espírito Santo state, and the other containing all of the remaining samples. The Mantel test confirmed this analysis and showed a significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances. These results suggested that A. robusta experiences isolation by distance: the greater the geographic distance between any two locations, the greater the genetic distance between them as well.

The genetic structure of A. robusta was also confirmed by AMOVA, which showed that most of the genetic variability (57.4%) was detected among the populations. This high genetic structure may reflect restricted or absent gene flow between localities as a result of fragmentation of the restinga biome. Indeed, the formation of these two groups can be explained by the existence of an arid region between southern Espírito Santo and northern Rio de Janeiro (Jackson, 1978) that would prevent the establishment of colonies of A. robusta in this region, thereby limiting the gene flow between populations. The fact that no samples of A. robusta were found in this region (despite sampling efforts in the field), together with the importance of the climatic conditions of this region in affecting the distribution and differentiation of lizards of the genus Enyalius (Jackson, 1978), support the hypothesis that the emergence of this drier region led to the isolation of populations and their subsequent genetic differentiation.

According to Jackson (1978), the more arid climate in this region (caused by the weak rain shadow on the coastal side of the mountains) and the penetrance of the Itapemirim River through southern Espírito Santo could have favored an invasion by the cerrado biome in extreme southern Espírito Santo. Thus, a dry period may have isolated part of the original population of A. robusta by interposing a drier region with more open vegetation in which A. robusta could not survive. In addition, the regions between northern Espírito Santo and southern Bahia (among others), as well as those located in the Serra dos Órgãos (Rio de Janeiro), may have functioned as large-scale refugia during the Pleistocene (Jackson, 1978), thereby favoring the establishment of A. robusta.

According to Teixeira et al. (2003), A. robusta is restricted to the restinga vegetation of the Brazilian coast extending from the southeastern state of Rio de Janeiro up to the Reconcavo Baiano, more formally known as the Moist Oriental Tertiary Brazilian Coast, in the state of Bahia (Schobbenhaus, 1984). These authors also suggested that A. robusta does not disperse southward because of the Serra do Mar mountain range present in the southern part of Rio de Janeiro state. Indeed, this species has not been found in restingas of the states of São Paulo (Mariconi, 1965), Santa Catarina (Bonnet and Lopes, 1993) and Paraná (Lopes, 1998). The superficial water table in São Paulo state could also contribute to the absence of A. robusta along the coast of this state since this water may interfere in nest development (Mariconi, 1965). Teixeira et al. (2003) emphasized that there is no record of A. robusta in the state of Bahia, despite the lack of any evident geographical barrier to impede the northward dispersion of this species beyond Espírito Santo.

The limited range of A. robusta suggests that this species may be adapted to specific environmental conditions. This, together with the fact that no other Atta species occur in this biome, indicates the need for further studies to explain the evolutionary strategies that differentiate A. robusta from the other species of this genus, especially with regard to the colonization of restingas (Teixeira et al., 2003). Endemism in restingas is probably associated with Pleistocene climatic oscillations and changes in sea level (Jackson, 1978), and several other taxa are also endemic to this biome. For example, Carvalho-e-Silva et al. (2000) identified five amphibian species (Leptodactylus marambaiae, Xenohyla truncata, Scinax littorea, Bufo pygmaeus and Scinax agilis) endemic to restingas of the Brazilian southeastern and south-northeastern regions. Additionally, Rocha et al. (2005) identified one species of reptile (Liolaemus lutzae), three species of birds (Formicivora littoralis, Mimus gilvus, Schistochlamys melanopis) and one species of rodent (Trinomys eliasi), all considered endangered, in the restingas of the Serra do Mar and Central da Mata Atlântica biodiversity corridors.

Atta robusta inhabits a very restricted environment that is being rapidly occupied by humans. This reduces the amount of available vegetation that in turn affects the distribution of A. robusta nests. Indeed, Teixeira and Schoereder (2003) found that arboreal plant cover has a positive effect on the density of A. robusta nests, whereas fragmented environments hinder the nesting ability of this species. These authors suggested that the dependency of A. robusta on areas with high vegetation cover could be a response to the species' particular needs in a restinga environment. Accordingly, Teixeira et al. (2005) found no A. robusta nests in environments degraded by burning. Once a restinga has been altered by human activity it is very difficult for it to be restored (Rocha et al., 2005). Thus, the fragmentation of restingas may have contributed to the genetic differentiation estimated for A. robusta in the present study.

Using the same samples analyzed in the present study, Simon et al. (2012) examined the nest density in different fragments of restinga as well as the environmental conditions necessary for colonization by A. robusta. These authors detected a greater abundance of nests in larger, more preserved fragments. They also reported that the areas sampled in Aracruz, Itapemirim and Marataízes (Espírito Santo) and São de Itaboapoana and São João da Barra (Rio de Janeiro) were in a critical condition with regard to the conservation of A. robusta: 38.8% of the nests sampled were in good condition, 18.8% were partially preserved and 36.3% were in a critical condition.

In addition to characteristics such as a tendency to salinity, high sand content and low levels of water and nutrient retention, the temperature in open restinga can reach more than 30 ºC at a depth of 30 cm (Franco et al., 1984). These characteristics may affect the establishment and initial development of A. robusta nests in this biome since the nests of leafcutter ants have an initial depth of only 8.5-18 cm. More generally, these characteristics mean that species that live in restingas, particularly A. robusta, recover slowly from disturbances caused by humans, and this could contribute to the decline of this species. Another important consideration is that the moisture inside nests may be more uniform in restingas that offer greater vegetation cover (Franco et al., 1984). This improved moisture could result in more resources for A. robusta (Teixeira and Schoereder, 2003) and contribute to the preservation of this species.

The results of this study provide additional information on the genetic organization and divergence of A. robusta populations. This knowledge may be useful in future management plans for this endemic species in the restingas of Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo. The preservation of A. robusta must attempt to maintain the highest possible number of colonies in their original habitat, i.e., protect the two genetic subgroups identified in this study. Since A. robusta nests only in areas covered with arboreal plants, recovering the vegetation in fragmented areas in order to construct corridors between larger areas could contribute to this species preservation. Finally, since remnant populations of A. robusta can adapt to the conditions of the restinga ecoregion, preserving whole restinga environments is also very important.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank colleagues of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics of Insects, especially Sabrina Soares Simon and Denise Pinto Eliane Euzébio, for collecting the biological material in the field and Dr. Cosme Damião Cruz (Universidade Federal de Viçosa) for help with the statistical analysis. EPR was supported by a scholarship from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnólogico (CNPq). This work was supported by a grant from the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG).

Internet Resources

Received: October 16, 2013;

Accepted: April 13, 2014.

Associate Editor: Antonio Matteo Solé-Cava

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

• Bonnet A and Lopes BC (1993) Formigas de dunas e restingas da Praia da Joaquina, Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC (Insecta, Hymenoptera). Biotemas 6:107-114.
• Borgmeier T (1939) Nova contribuição para o conhecimento das formigas neotropicais. Rev Entomol 10:403-428.
• Carvalho-e-Silva SP, Izecksohn E and Carvalho-e-Silva AMPT (2000) Diversidade e ecologia de anfíbios em restingas do sudeste brasileiro. In: Esteves FA and Lacerda LD (eds) Ecologia de Restingas e Lagoas Costeiras. NUPEM/UFRJ, Macaé, pp 89-97.
• Currie CRA (2001) Community of ants, fungi and bacteria: A multilateral approach to studying symbiosis. Annu Rev Microbiol 55:357-380.
• Excoffier L, Smouse PE and Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491.
• Fowler HG (1995) The population status of the endangered Brazilian endemic leaf-cutting ant Atta robusta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ecol Lett 74:347-350.
• Franco AC, Valeriano DM, Santos FM, Hay JD, Henrique RPB and Medeiros RA (1984) Os microclimas das zonas de vegetação da praia da restinga de Barra do Maricá, Rio de Janeiro. In: Lacerda LD, Araújo DSD, Cerqueira R and Turcq B (eds) Restingas: Origem, Estrutura, Processos. Anais do Simpósio sobre Restingas Brasileiras, Niterói, pp 413-425.
• Freire MSB (1990) Levantamento florístico do Parque Estadual das Dunas de Natal. Acta Bot Brasílica 4:41-59.
• Galindo-Leal C and Câmara IG (2003) Atlantic Forest hotspots status: An overview. In: Galindo-Leal C and Câmara IG (eds) The Atlantic Forest of South America: Biodiversity Status Threats and Outlook. Island Press, Washington, pp 3-11.
• Gonçalves CR (1942) Contribuição para o conhecimento do gênero Atta Fabr., das formigas saúvas. Bol Soc Bras Agron 3:333-357.
• Gonçalves CR (1960) Distribuição biologia e ecologia das saúvas. Div Agron 1:2-10.
• Henriques RPB, Araújo DSD and Hay JD (1987) Descrição e classificação dos tipos de vegetação da restinga de Carapebus, Rio de Janeiro. Rev Bras Bot 2:173-189.
• Jaccard P (1908) Nouvelle recherché sur la distribuition floral. Bull Soc Sci Nat Ouest Fr 44:223-270.
• Jackson JF (1978) Differentiation in the genera Enyalius and Strobilurus (Iguanidae): Implications for Pleistocene climatic changes in eastern Brazil. Arq Zool 30:1-79.
• Lacerda LD, Araujo DSD and Maciel NC (1993) Dry coastal ecosystems of the tropical Brazilian coast. In: Van der Maarel E (ed) Dry Coastal Ecosystems: Africa, America, Asia and Oceania. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 477-493.
• Lopes BC (1998) Formigas cortadeiras (Formicidae, Attini) de praias e restingas da Ilha de Santa Catarina, SC. Anais do II Simpósio Brasileiro de Restingas e Lagoas Costeiras, Macaé, pp 49.
• Machado ABM, Martins CS and Drummond GM (2005) Lista da Fauna Ameaçada de Extinção: Incluindo as Listas das Espécies Quase Ameaçadas e Deficientes em Dados. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, 160 pp.
• Mariconi FAM (1965) Aspectos ecológicos e bionômicos das saúvas da região oriental do estado de São Paulo. An Esc Super Agric Luiz de Queiroz 22:213-232.
• Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Alves MAS and Van Sluys M (2003) A Biodiversidade nos Grandes Remanescentes Florestais do Estado do Rio de Janeiro e nas Restingas da Mata Atlântica. Rima, São Carlos, 146 pp.
• Rocha CFD, Van Sluys M, Bergallo HG and Alves MAS (2005) Endemic and threatened tetrapods in the restingas of the biodiversity corridors of Serra do Mar and of the Central da Mata Atlântica in eastern Brazil. Braz J Biol 65:159-168.
• Rocha CFD, Bergallo HG, Van Sluys M, Alves MAS and Jamel CE (2007) The remnants of restinga habitats in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest of Rio de Janeiro state Brazil: Habitat loss and risk of disappearance. Braz J Biol 67:263-273.
• Schobbenhaus C (1984) Geologia do Brasil. Departamento Nacional da Produção Mineral, Brasília, 501 pp.
• Simon SS, Teixeira MC, Vargas FP, Euzébio DE and Salomão TMF (2012) A conservação dos habitats de restingas e o status de proteção das populações de Atta robusta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Anais do II Simpósio Nacional de Áreas Protegidas, Viçosa, pp 11-17.
• Sugiyama M (1998) Estudo de florestas da restinga da Ilha do Cardoso, Cananéia, São Paulo, Brasil. Bol Inst Bot 11:119-159.
• Teixeira MC and Schoereder JH (2003) The effect of plant cover on Atta robusta (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) distribution in Restinga vegetation. Sociobiology 41:615-623.
• Teixeira MC, Schoereder JH and Mayhé-Nunes AJ (2003) Geographic distribution of Atta robusta Borgmeier (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Neotrop Entomol 32:719-721.
• Teixeira MC, Schoereder JH and Louzada JNC (2004) Occurrence of Atta robusta Borgmeier (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in the North of Espírito Santo State. Neotrop Entomol 33:265-266.
• Teixeira MC, Schoereder JH, Nascimento JT and Louzada JNC (2005) Response of ant communities to sand dune vegetation burning in Brazil (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Sociobiology 45:631-641.
• Waldschmidt AM, Salomão TMF, Barros EG and Campos LAO (1997) Extraction of genomic DNA from Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera, Apidae Meliponinae). Braz J Genet 20:421-423.
• Cruz CD (2013) Programa Genes: Aplicativo Computacional em Genética e Estatística. Versão Windows 2013. UFV, Viçosa, MG. http://www.ufv.br/dbg/biodata.htm (October 16, 2003).
• Teixeira MC (2007) Dispersão de sementes por Atta robusta Borgmeier 1939 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) na Restinga da Ilha de Guriri. Doctoral Thesis, 70 pp. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa. http://www.tede.ufv.br/tedesimplificado/tde_arquivos/10/TDE-2007-10-22T092622Z-903/Publico/texto%20completo.pdf (October 16, 2013).
• Yeh FC, Yang R and Boyle T (1999) POPGENE Version 1.32 Microsoft Windows-based freeware for populations genetic analysis. University of Alberta, Edmonton. http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/popgene.html (October 16, 2013).

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  22 Sept 2014
• Date of issue
  Sept 2014

History

• Accepted
  13 Apr 2014
• Received
  16 Oct 2013