An investigation into the dissolution characteristics of γ precipitates in Mg-3Al-Zn alloy

An investigation into the dissolution characteristics of γ precipitates in Mg-3Al-Zn alloy

Javad Mohammadi^I,*; Marjan Ghoreishi^II; Yashar Behnamian^III

^IDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

IIAzad University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

IIIDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada

ABSTRACT

In non-equilibrium conditions, the coring phenomena may occur in the α-Mg solid solution and γ-Mg₁₇Al₁₂ phase forms in the microstructure of AZ magnesium alloy series. This eutectic phase may introduce detrimental effect on workability of wrought alloys. In the present work, the dissolution characteristics of γ phase have been investigated in AZ31 wrought magnesium alloy. Considering the eutectic temperature of AZ31 alloy, the homogenization treatment was executed in temperature range of 300-437 ºC (i.e., somewhat below eutectic melting temperature of γ precipitate) and 437-500 ºC (i.e., higher eutectic melting temperature of γ precipitate) for different durations. A thorough microstructural investigation and also thermodynamic calculations were executed. The results indicated that the dissolution rate of γ phase is very low even at temperatures just below the eutectic point of the alloy, whereas it dramatically increases at temperatures higher than eutectic point. Moreover, it is suggested that partial melting of γ phase due to eutectic melting reaction (α+γ→L) may lead to reduced formability.

Keywords: AZ31, homogenization, Mg₁₇Al₁₂, eutectic melting, workability

1. Introduction

As the lightest structural metallic material, magnesium alloys not only hold low density (almost two-thirds of aluminum), but also possess high specific strength, excellent damping and good ecology properties (easy to recycle and abundant in resources). Owing to these desirable properties, magnesium alloys are attractive in electronic, aeronautical and transportation industries^1-3. Accordingly a thorough investigation of high temperature plastic deformation behavior of magnesium alloys is highly necessitated. This may assist enhancing the alloy workability which in turn plays an essential role in the industrialization of component fabrication. Among magnesium alloys, AZ31, as the most common wrought magnesium alloy, is of particular interest because of the good balance of strength and ductility. A number of previous investigations have studied hot formability of this alloy under specified conditions^4-7. These researches made many attempts to develop suitable deformation condition for AZ31 alloy. In fact the important thermomechanical parameters such as temperature, strain rate and deformation ratio were considered, and yet less attention has been paid to the effects of second phase particles in initial microstructure.

AZ31 alloy may contain a small fraction of γ-Mg₁₇Al₁₂ particles (as a part of eutectic transformation) distributing either in grain interiors or along grain boundaries. Dissolution Rate of γ phase is very low even at temperature just below the eutectic point of the alloy⁸. Some researches have been reported the detrimental effect of these particles at low temperatures^9,10. Moreover, considering the reported eutectic reaction temperature (~437 ºC)¹¹and also the melting point of γ particles (~462 ºC)¹², the presence of γ phase may possibly introduce a significant detrimental effect on high temperature mechanical response of AZ31 magnesium alloy.

As the wrought magnesium alloys are usually homogenized before applying any manufacturing process, in the present work dissolution characteristics of γ phase were studied in AZ31 Mg alloy. This was carried out applying homogenization treatment at temperatures below and higher than that of eutectic point of the alloy. To assist explaining dissolution kinetic of γ phase, differential thermal analysis, microstructural investigation and thermodynamic calculations were employed.

2. Experimental Procedure

An AZ31 magnesium alloy Mg-2.9%Al-0.85%Zn-0.3%Mn (All in wt. %) was selected as the experimental material. This was received as-hot rolled plates with 22 mm thickness. The alloy initial back scattered SEM microstructure is shown in Fig. 1. From this the existence of the second phase particles is realized. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) results indicate that the second phases (i.e., γ-Mg₁₇Al₁₂ as well as few particles of Al-Mn compounds) are distributed either in grain interiors or along grain boundaries (Figure 1b and c). To determine the characteristics of γ precipitates, differential thermal analysis (DTA) was performed at 5 k/min heating/cooling rate. The size and distribution of Al-Mn intermetallic compounds were not affected by the homogenization treatment due to their high temperature melting (~705 ºC), which is well higher than the temperature range of thermo-mechanical processing of the magnesium alloy (250-450 ºC)².

Considering the eutectic temperature of experimental alloy, the homogenization treatment was executed in temperature ranges of 300-437 ºC (below the eutectic invariant temperature of γ phase) and 437-500 ºC (higher than the eutectic invariant temperature of γ phase). Homogenization treatment was performed in a resistance furnace at 420 ºC for 3, 6, 12 hr and also at 450, 475 ºC for 5 min. Homogenization times were adopted based on the low kinetics rate of the process below eutectic temperature⁸ and the related thermodynamic calculation at temperatures higher than eutectic point. The specimens with size of 8 mm × 8 mm × 1.5 mm were used to facilitate the fast heating response. The specimens were immediately water quenched right at the end of homogenization treatment. To reveal the obtained microstructure, the specimens were prepared using standard metallographic methods. The microstructural observation was performed at the center and mid-height of the treated specimens.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the microstructure of homogenized specimens at 420 ºC for different homogenization times. In the initial equiaxed microstructure of the as-received alloy (Figure 2a) many twins are observed. This surely indicates the occurrence of twining during previous rolling schedule. The initial grain size was measured to be about 11 µm. As is seen in Figures 2b and c, after homogenization for 3 and 6 hr at 420 ºC the twins are completely disappeared, but a significant amount of γ phase particles remains the same in appearance. The latter confirms that the dissolution, which is governed by solid state diffusion, is a very slow process at this temperature. However, increasing the homogenization time to 12 hr at 420 ºC results in dissociation of γ phases in α-Mg matrix where a noticeably grain growth is observed (Figure 2d). Therefore, it is concluded that the dissolution rate of divorced γ phase is very slow even at temperature just below (and very close to) the eutectic point of the alloy.

Figure 3a demonstrates the microstructure of the alloy treated at 450 ºC for 5 min. The occurrence of incipient melting within the γ particles is evident. This may imply to the initiation of a local melting due to the reaction of the small γ phase particles with the surrounding α phase region. Providing more time, this incipient melting will be extended to the whole γ particles.

To determine the characteristics of γ precipitates and to assist explaining the dissolution rate of this eutectic phase, differential thermal analysis (DTA) was also performed. The thermal analysis curve of the experimental alloy (Figure 4) exhibits only one strong peak during heating/cooling cycle related to the extensive melting and re-solidification of α-Mg solid solution, respectively. However, two strong signals were reported to be clearly observed for other alloys of Mg-Al-Zn system such as AZ61 and AZ91 alloy^11,13. These researches reported that the second signal at about 437 ºC in thermal analysis of AZ alloy series with higher Al content may be attributed to the precipitation of γ phase under the non-equilibrium cooling condition (Scheil condition) and γ eutectic melting reaction during subsequent equilibrium heating.

The solidification curve of experimental alloy (the variation of liquid fraction versus temperature), which was calculated under equilibrium conditions (solid line) as well as Scheil condition (dashed line), are shown in Figure 5. As is seen the liquid fraction markedly decreases as α-Mg solid solution phase forms at about 630 ºC. In equilibrium condition, the solidification ends at about 575 ºC, but in non-equilibrium condition a kink (arrowed in Figure 5) is observed at about 431 ºC which closely corresponds to the precipitation of γ phase under Scheil conditions.

The specific solid content f_s of experimental alloy which is mostly γ eutectic phase can be calculated according to Scheil's equation ¹⁴:

Where T_m is the melting temperature of pure metal, T_L is the liquidus temperature and k₀ is the equilibrium distribution coefficient of the alloy. The volume fraction of γ eutectic phase in non-equilibrium solidification state of experimental alloy is estimated to be about 1.7%. As is reported, a complete mixture in liquid state and a negligible diffusion in the solid are considered in Scheil model¹⁵. Therefore the real values of f_s should be smaller than that of calculated one. Thus, it may be deduced that in contrast to the AZ61 and AZ91 alloys, due to small volume fraction of γ precipitates in AZ31 Mg alloy, no significant signal related to precipitation of γ phase or γ eutectic melting would be detected. A similar behavior was observed in thermal analysis curve of AM50 magnesium alloy¹⁶. However, solidification process of Mg-Al-Zn system is far from an equilibrium condition even at extremely slow cooling rate of 1 K/min¹¹, and coring in α-Mg solid solution occurs and γ phase forms in the microstructure of Mg-Al alloys with down to about 2 wt. % Al¹⁷. It is worth mentioning that the coring occurs even in alloy with 0.01 % solute atom¹⁸. Consequently, even though in the present DTA no peaks of γ eutectic phase could be monitored, still the local formation of this phase is anticipated.

Accordingly, the observed semi-divorced morphology of γ eutectic phase in homogenized microstructure at 450 ºC for 5 min (Figure 3a) can be discussed relying on the partial melting of γ-Mg₁₇Al₁₂ phase. This is due to the eutectic melting reaction which is appeared to occur at ~ 437 ºC. Increasing the temperature to 450 ºC (just higher than the eutectic temperature of experimental alloy), local melting occurs by the inverse eutectic reaction of the γ-phase region with the surrounding α-phase matrix.

The microstructure of the specimen which was homogenized at 475 ºC for 5 min is shown in Figure 3b. Further increasing the temperature to 475 ºC (above melting point of γ precipitates ~462 ºC), the incipient melting of γ particles may be completed. This would be ended to a homogenized single phase microstructure. The dissolution of melted eutectic precipitates can be estimated based on the thermodynamic calculation. The dissolution kinetics of plate-shaped melted eutectic films at any given temperature can be evaluated using Whelan method¹⁹ (see the Appendix A). In this way the time required for dissolution of a plate shaped liquid film and spherical liquid droplets are determined by the following equations, respectively:

Where B is half the thickness of the liquid film, k is the thermodynamic driving force for dissolution and D is the solute diffusion coefficient for a given temperature. The times required for dissolution of γ phase, at various temperatures of 450, 475 and 500 ºC, were calculated and plotted against film thickness in Figure 6. Therefore it is concluded that in thermomechanical processing during soaking time at the test temperature, may not provide adequate time for melting and dissolution of γ phase in matrix. Thus the presence of partially melted γ phase may results in the strain concentration, reduced elongation and premature fracture.

In according to the above discussion, the eutectic reaction and incipient melting of γ phase are occurred during thermomechanical treatments. This imposes a detrimental effect on hot workability of AZ31 alloy. This may be considered as a rationale for previously reported formability change in AZ31. The ductility data of AZ31 alloy reported in the literature for the hot rolled²⁰ and as-cast condition²¹ have been used to re-plot the ductility-temperature curve as shown in Figure 7. As is clearly realized the ductility reduces at around ~ 437 ºC and strain rate of 0.1s^–1 for the as-cast condition; whereas it increases as higher temperatures. In the case of wrought AZ31 alloy, the increase in ductility is also minimal under similar deformation conditions (400-450 ºC/0.1s^–1). In agreement with the results of present work the observed ductility drop is attributed to the partial melting of γ phase due to the eutectic melting reaction of α+γ → L.

In contrast, it is shown that at lower strain rates (<10^–3 s^–1), the hot rolled AZ31 alloy exhibits superplasticity and the ductility increases monotonically by temperature. In addition no sharp transition from lower to higher ductility is seen. It should be noted that the effect of second γ phase on workability and optimum deformation conditions of the alloy is strongly influenced by strain rate and prior history. However, as is well established the phenomenon of high-strain-rate super-plasticity (HSRS) can be related to the formation of thin, liquid-phase layers at interfaces or grain boundaries²². Moreover, for present experimental alloy it was previously shown by two of present authors that at temperature higher than 460 ºC, locally melted γ phase acts as a lubricant in compressive deformation regimes. This in turn serves to relax the stress concentrations caused by the dislocations piles-up thereby resulting in flow acceleration of the solid under lubricated flow mechanism²³.

4. Conclusion

In the present work, considering the eutectic temperature of AZ31 alloy, homogenization treatment was performed below and higher than the eutectic melting temperature of γ precipitates through different homogenization times. The results indicated that the dissolution rate of γ phase is very low even at temperatures just below the eutectic point of the alloy in solid state, whereas is dramatically increased at temperatures higher than eutectic point where melting of γ precipitates is commenced. The ductility drop which had been observed in ductility-temperature curve of AZ31 alloy at ~ 437 ºC was rationalized relying on the partial melting of γ-Mg₁₇Al₁₂ phase due to inverse eutectic reaction.

Received: January 8, 2014;

Revised: June 10, 2014

Appendix A

Figure A.1 shows the binary Mg–Al equilibrium phase diagram. The driving force for diffusion and dissolution of liquid droplets is determined by the relation:

For AZ31:

The diffusion coefficient depends on temperature as is follows:

Where R = 8.314 × 10^-3 kJ/ (mol K) and the diffusion rate of Al in Mg is¹¹:

D₀ = 1.53 ×10⁷ µm² / s, Q = 125 kJ/mol

For AZ31:

D_{Al in Mg =} 1.42 ×10^-2 µm² at 450 ºC

D_{Al in Mg =} 2.85 ×10^-2 µm² at 475 ºC

D_{Al in Mg =} 5.46 ×10^-2 µm² at 500 ºC

References

• 1. Li Z, Dong J, Zeng XQ, Lu C and Ding WJ. Influence of Mg17Al12 intermetallic compounds on the hot extruded microstructures and mechanical properties of Mg9Al1Zn alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2007; 466(1-2):134-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.029
• 2. Huang X, Suzuki K, Watazu A, Shigematsu I and Saito N. Effects of Homogenization Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Hot-Rolled AZ31 Magnesium Alloy. Materials Science Forum 2007; 561-565:255-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.255
• 3. Quan GZ, Shi Y, Wang YX, Kang BS, Ku TW and Song WJ. Constitutive modeling for the dynamic recrystallization evolution of AZ80 magnesium alloy based on stressstrain data. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2011; 528(28):8051-8059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.064
• 4. Spigarelli S, Mehtedi ME, Cabibbo M, Evangelista E, Kaneko J, Jäger A et al. Analysis of high-temperature deformation and microstructure of an AZ31 magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2007; 462(1-2):197-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.155
• 5. Al-Samman T and Gottstein G. Dynamic recrystallization during high temperature deformation of magnesium. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2008; 490(1-2):411-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.004
• 6. Zhang KF, Yin DL and Wu DZ. Formability of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets at warm working conditions. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 2006; 46(11):1276-1280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.014
• 7. Prasad Y and Rao KP. Processing maps for hot deformation of rolled AZ31 magnesium alloy plate: anisotropy of hot workability. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2008; 487(1-2):316-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.038
• 8. Zhu T, Chen ZW and Gao W. Incipient melting in partially melted zone during arc welding of AZ91D magnesium alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2006; 416(1-2):246-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2005.10.032
• 9. Lü YZ, Wang QD, Ding WJ, Zeng XQ and Zhu YP. Fracture behavior of AZ91 magnesium alloy. Materials Letters 2000; 44(5):265-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(00)00041-0
• 10. Lin DL, Zeng XQ, Ding WJ, Jin L and Mao DL. Effect of second phase on the mechanical properties of Mg-Al-Zn alloy by equal channel angular extrusion. Materials Science Forum 2007; 546-549:249-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.546-549.249
• 11. Ohno M, Mirkovic D and Schmid-Fetzer R. Liquidus and solidus temperatures of Mg-rich MgAlMnZn alloys. Acta Materialia 2006; 54(15):3883-3891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.022
• 12. Brooks CR. Heat treatment, structure, and properties of nonferr ous alloys Ohio: American Society for Metals; 1982.
• 13. Ohno M, Mirkovic D and Schmid-Fetzer R. Phase equilibria and solidification of Mg-rich MgAlZn alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2006; 421(1-2):328-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.006
• 14. Czerwinski F. Near-liquidus molding of MgAl and MgAlZn alloys. Acta Materialia 2005; 53(7):1973-1984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.009
• 15. Mingbo Y, Fusheng P, Renju Ch and Liang B. Effect of semi-solid isothermal heat treatment on the microstructure of Mg6A11Zn0.7Si alloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2008; 206:374-381
• 16. Mirković D and Schmid-Fetzer R. Solidification curves for commercial Mg alloys determined from differential scanning calorimetry with improved heat-transfer modeling. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 2007; 38(10):2575-2592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11661-007-9237-z
• 17. Dahle AK, Lee YC, Nave MD, Schaffer PL and StJohn DH. Development of the as-cast microstructure in magnesiumaluminium alloys. Journal of Light Metals 2001; 1(1):61-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1471-5317(00)00007-9
• 18. Reed-Hill RE and Abbaschian R. Physical metallurgy principles New York: Van Nostrand Princeton; 1964.
• 19. Yamamoto M, Gerlich A, North TH and Shinozaki K. Cracking in the stir zones of Mg-alloy friction stir spot welds. Journal of Materials Science 2007; 42(18):7657-7666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1662-2
• 20. Wu X and Liu Y. Superplasticity of coarse-grained magnesium alloy. Scripta Materialia 2002; 46(4):269-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01234-9
• 21. Myshlyaev MM, McQueen HJ, Mwembela A and Konopleva E. Twinning, dynamic recovery and recrystallization in hot worked MgAlZn alloy. Materials Science and Engineering: A 2002; 337(1-2):121-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(02)00007-2
• 22. Higashi K, Nieh TG, Mabuchi M and Wadsworth J. Effect of liquid phases on the tensile elongation of superplastic aluminum alloys and composites. Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 1995; 32(7):1079-1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(94)00003-Z
• 23. Chino Y, Kobata M, Iwasaki H and Mabuchi M. An investigation of compressive deformation behaviour for AZ91 Mg alloy containing a small volume of liquid. Acta Materialia 2003; 51(11):3309-3318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00162-9

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  01 Aug 2014
• Date of issue
  Aug 2014

History

• Received
  08 Jan 2014
• Accepted
  10 June 2014