Biotechnological approaches to the treatment of aspermatogenic men

REVIEW

Biotechnological approaches to the treatment of aspermatogenic men

Pedro Manuel Aponte^I,II; Stefan Schlatt^III; Luiz Renato de Franca^I

^IFederal University of Minas Gerais, Department of Morphology, Minas Gerais, Brazil

^IICentral University of Venezuela, Department of Anatomy, Maracay, Venezuela

^IIICenter for Reproductive Medicine and Andrology, Münster, Germany

ABSTRACT

Aspermatogenesis is a severe impairment of spermatogenesis in which germ cells are completely lacking or present in an immature form, which results in sterility in approximately 25% of patients. Because assisted reproduction techniques require mature germ cells, biotechnology is a valuable tool for rescuing fertility while maintaining biological fatherhood. However, this process involves, for instance, the differentiation of preexisting immature germ cells or the production/derivation of sperm from somatic cells. This review critically addresses four potential techniques: sperm derivation in vitro, germ stem cell transplantation, xenologous systems, and haploidization. Sperm derivation in vitro is already feasible in fish and mammals through organ culture or 3D systems, and it is very useful in conditions of germ cell arrest or in type II Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. Patients afflicted by type I Sertoli-cell-only syndrome could also benefit from gamete derivation from induced pluripotent stem cells of somatic origin, and human haploid-like cells have already been obtained by using this novel methodology. In the absence of alternative strategies to generate sperm in vitro, in germ cells transplantation fertility is restored by placing donor cells in the recipient germ-cell-free seminiferous epithelium, which has proven effective in conditions of spermatogonial arrest. Grafting also provides an approach for ex-vivo generation of mature sperm, particularly using prepubertal testis tissue. Although less feasible, haploidization is an option for creating gametes based on biological cloning technology. In conclusion, the aforementioned promising techniques remain largely experimental and still require extensive research, which should address, among other concerns, ethical and biosafety issues, such as gamete epigenetic status, ploidy, and chromatin integrity.

Keywords: Spermatogenesis; Azoospermia; Assisted Reproductive Techniques; Transplantation; Spermatozoa; Biotechnology.

INTRODUCTION

Beyond the apparent anatomical simplicity of the male reproductive system, which has a basic design consisting of a pair of gonads with its corresponding excurrent ducts and associated accessory sexual glands, there lies an overwhelmingly complex system that is responsible for gamete production and transport into the female tract for ultimate sexual reproduction. Although many aspects of the endocrine regulation of testis function are well understood and therapeutic options for hypogonadal men are available, many aspects of the multiple physiological processes involved in gamete development inside the testis are often deregulated and out of homeostasis, with the subsequent outcome of absent or disturbed spermatogenesis, which leads to infertility. Human infertility is usually defined as the inability of couples to achieve pregnancy after 12 months of unprotected intercourse and is a problem that currently affects 10 to 15% of couples. An outstanding 50% of these cases are associated with male factors (1,2)

Specific etiologies of male infertility include systemic diseases (e.g., endocrine, infectious, and cancer), varicoceles, obstructive syndromes, genetic/chromosomal factors, testi-cular failure/hypogonadism, and cryptorchidism. Of all of the causes reported, approximately 12% of the determinants of primary dysfunction in the male reproductive organs are of unknown origin and are usually confounded by the context of multicausal origins (Figure 1).

Furthermore, it is clear that many cases of infertility are secondary to general systemic diseases or congenital defects, with reproductive consequences that may be treated when appropriate state-of-the-art procedures are implemented. Data in the literature show that 25 to 75% of cases (depending on the report/study) could theoretically be treated medically and/or surgically (Figure 1). In many cases, very few sperm are present in the testes, and they can be retrieved by biopsy and testicular sperm extraction from the tissue. Patients with access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART) can undergo ICSI (intracytoplasmatic sperm injection), which is routinely used in many fertility centers worldwide, to achieve pregnancy. However, the group of patients for whom ART procedures are not an option deserves special attention. These men present with azoospermia and varying degrees of germ cell pathology, from germinal aplasia to germ cell premeoitic/meiotic arrest. This group of testicular pathologies has a poor prognosis and holds the status of being untreatable and incurable from a medical point of view. We propose that men with incomplete spermatogenesis could be collectively classified as aspermatogenic, i.e., having a severe testicular pathology with a complete absence of spermatids. Such men comprise from 25 to 50% of andrological cases (3,4) (see Figure 1), and the only option currently available for these patients is adoption or artificial insemination using donor sperm.

Histopathologic findings in biopsies from patients in the aspermatogenic group can be classified as: a) Sertoli cell only (SCO) syndrome, which strictly consists of testes presenting a complete absence of germ cells; b) arrest at the level of meiotic germ cells; or c) spermatogonia only (pre-meiotic arrest) (Figure 2).

Sertoli cell only syndrome, i.e., type I SCO, refers to a situation in which testicular biopsy reveals an absence of germ cells in the seminiferous tubules (5). The presence of few seminiferous tubules showing active spermatogenesis has also been referred as to focal SCO (6) or type II SCO (MeSH database PubMed). However, in contrast to patients with complete SCO, these patients benefit from ART procedures, as their sperm can be retrieved by TESE (testicular sperm extraction). Type I SCO can have a genetically determined developmental origin that results in the disturbance of migration and/or colonization of primordial germ cells (PGCs) into the genital ridges. Because the diagnosis of type I or type II SCO depends on histopathologic analysis, which is of course prone to sampling error (because biopsies cover only a very small portion of the testis), the subtypes of SCO are often misdiagnosed. The situation would present less of a diagnostic challenge if a reliable, non-invasive method were available to distinguish cases of partial and complete absence of germ cells. The first steps in this direction involved the amplification of specific germ cells, seminal vesicles and prostate mRNA from cell-free seminal mRNA by using RT-PCR (7). Combinations of non-invasive diagnostic procedures with other procedures, such as hormonal profiles and histopathology, may unequivocally help to diagnose patients correctly. As type I SCO patients have no germ cells, the only possible way to generate offspring would be the use of their somatic cells to generate germline cells in vitro.

Arrest represents a situation in which spermatogenesis stops at a specific stage of germ cell development. McLachlan et al. proposed a nomenclature in which the term arrest exclusively refers to histological samples in which no progression occurs beyond that specific stage in any seminiferous tubule (5). Arrest can represent an intermediate step on the way to more severe germ cell losses. Arrest occurs often at the spermatocytes or spermatogonial level (12.5% and 1.7% of 534 patients, respectively) (5). Arrest during spermiogenesis is rare, and hyposperma-togenesis (often misdiagnosed as arrest), in which a lower spermatid count is combined with the presence of all spermatogenic stages, which are reduced to some extent, accounts for up to 63% of cases (7). In any case, because hypospermatogenesis results in the presence of spermatids, ART procedures are applicable. Given that germ cells are present in cases of arrest, an interesting strategy would be to differentiate these cells in vitro to obtain sperm for ICSI or IVF (in vitro fertilization). Interestingly, in arrest at the level of meiotic cells, these cells can be injected into oocytes to produce viable embryos and even offspring (8-10). Nevertheless, intracytoplasmatic spermatocyte injection is only an experimental option with low efficiency. For instance, only 15% of mouse oocytes injected with secondary sperma-tocytes generated offspring, whereas those injected with primary spermatocytes generated none (8). Furthermore, in another set of experiments, from 0 to 9% of eggs "fertilized" by primary spermatocytes developed into adult fertile mice (9). In humans, one report showed an offspring-deriving efficiency of approximately 3% (10). For these reasons, the use of spermatocytes to compensate for a lack of more mature male germ cells will require further experimentation.

Many patients believe that biological fatherhood has a very high value. In this respect, biotechnology offers, now more than ever, a basis on which to develop clinical applications for such cases, to restore fertility and consequently to obtain offspring. In this context, advances in cell biology from several animal models are waiting to be translated into human reproductive medicine, provided that some technical issues and biosafety and ethical concerns are overcome. We propose four main groups of technologies that, alone or combined, could bring hope to men with severe cases of aspermatogenesis: i) sperm derivation in vitro; ii) germ stem cell transplantation; iii) xenologous systems; and iv) haploidization. These topics are addressed below.

SPERM DERIVATION IN VITRO

The complex spatial and functional organization of the testis and its seminiferous epithelium make it difficult to achieve efficient spermatogenesis in artificial systems. The observation of at least a few aspects of spermatogenesis in culture dishes has been a scientific aim for decades (17,18). Spermatogenesis in vitro is not only a long-desired technique to gain deeper insight into the complex process of gametogenesis; it is also desired for clinical applications to broaden the therapeutic options for men with infertility problems. Given the current status of ART and the requirement of only one sperm to fertilize an oocyte through ICSI, the in vivo physiological situation, in which millions of sperm (many more than needed) are produced on a daily basis may be surpassed by in vitro strategies, which may be inefficient but which can generate a few fully mature sperm for ART procedures.

Spermatogenesis in vitro was first successfully achieved in vertebrates by using a fish model that consisted of a tissue culture system that supported full spermatogenesis in Japanese eels (19,20), which opened the possibility for similar technological advances in higher vertebrates. Systems for in vitro spermatogenesis in fish seem to be very simple from a practical point of view. For example, one such system based on a spermatogonial cell line without Sertoli cells and involving medaka fish, allowed postmeiotic advances in the presence of a culture medium containing a crude embryo extract with no specific growth factors added (21), which introduced the idea that germ cells in lower vertebrates are more intrinsically programmed and less dependent on regulation by extrinsic signals.

Currently, two main experimental approaches dominate the efforts to generate mammalian sperm in culture systems: organ culture of testes or testicular fragments that maintain the complex architecture of testicular tissue and its arrangement inside the epithelium. A recent article by Sato et al. convincingly demonstrated, in what has been described as a great scientific breakthrough, the feasibility of obtaining viable and apparently normal offspring from sperm generated through testicular tissue explants that initially contained immature germ cells (22). In this approach, the cytoarchitecture of the gonad remains widely preserved in the system, many endogenous factors are produced and released by the mostly intact seminiferous epithelium, and associated somatic cells regulate the germ cells in the system similarly to the in vivo condition. In dissected tissue, the supply of oxygen and nutrients is disturbed, and therefore the spermatogenic process is often disrupted and continues, at best, at low efficiency (22). Alternatively, enzymatically digested cell suspensions can be used for various culture systems. The supply of oxygen and nutrients to isolated cells is achieved by modern cell culture media under appropriate culture conditions. However, the seminiferous tubule microenvironment, with its different, functionally distinct compartments (e.g., interstitial, basal, intraepithelial, and adluminal), is destroyed. If these changes in the microenvironment during germ cell differentiation are significant, then spermatogenesis will be disrupted. Although many additional strategies of cell and tissue culture have been tested over the last 30 years, success has been limited (23-29). Recent studies have used mono-layers other than those generated from Sertoli cells as sources of differentiating factors (30-33). Because the production of sperm in higher vertebrates involves an overwhelmingly intricate process of germ cell differentiation, further research efforts have been directed toward identifying signaling pathways associated with differentiation in the seminiferous epithelium during spermatogenesis. To incorporate this knowledge into the development of in vitro spermatogenesis systems, studies that have addressed the presence of substances such as retinol (34,35), kit ligand (stem cell factor) (36,37), insulin-like growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha) (38), as well as hormones such as testosterone (39) and FSH (40), among others, have been instrumental in recapitulating the entire differentiation process. These studies will become particularly valuable if the paradigm of spermatogenesis in vitro, as a model of the in vivo situation, is accepted. Therefore, other factors, such as scrotal temperature, the timing of cellular events and the presence of important culture media components, e.g., fetal calf serum, oxygen levels, pressure, substrates and the use of feeder layers, should be carefully evaluated and whenever possible translated from the in vivo situation to the artificial system. The use of Sertoli cells is controversial but, in principle, these cells are important for the maintenance of germ cells in culture and to provide differentiating factors (41-44). Among the advantages of cell culture systems is that such systems (cell cultures started from dissociated germ cell suspensions) are much simpler than tissue cultures, in which cell function is tightly regulated and more complex, as in the in vivo situation. Cell cultures can be started with purified, selected, isolated cells, thereby allowing uncomplicated manipulation schemes because signal redundancy, which is observed in intact biological systems, is minimized. Furthermore, as the first step of the procedure, germ cells can be stimulated to proliferate in vitro, which creates the conditions suitable to obtain large numbers of spermatogonial stem cells before inducing them to differentiate during the process of gamete production.

Recently, a novel three-dimensional testicular cell culture approach was described. The soft agar culture system (SACS), which was originally described for the culture of hematopoietic cells in vitro, has created the conditions necessary to enable the full development of murine male germ cells in vitro (45-47). This system provides options for manipulation, e.g., the testing of the effects of hormones, drugs, toxins or other compounds on germ cell development. We were able to demonstrate the progression of spermatogonia into meiosis and the cells' further maturation into morphologically normal spermatozoa. However, the efficiency of sperm production with SACS is very low. The success of such strategies may depend on the reconstruction of small functional units of testicular cells inside the matrix, which occasionally fully resembles the microenvironment in the seminiferous tubules and thus results in small islands of complete spermatogenesis.

To recapitulate the situation in the testis, researchers must sequentially and gradually provide the right substances/ conditions at the proper time, thereby emulating the in vivo processes that occur in an orderly fashion in different functional compartments (e.g., basal, meiotic, and adlum-inal) of the seminiferous epithelium during normal in vivo spermatogenesis. Apparently, the most challenging step of differentiation to achieve in an in vitro spermatogenic system is proceeding beyond meiosis (41). Hence, progress must be experimentally monitored by meiotic/postmeiotic-specific markers, by immunohistochemistry and/or by PCR. Some examples are summarized in Table 1. The need to distinguish somatic cells renders the use of markers for this cell group useful (Table 2).

These findings have greatly inspired further research involving humans in the hope of reversing cases of incomplete spermatogenesis. This type of approach would require biopsy procedures, which usually yield small testicular samples with limited numbers of germ cells. If the availability of testicular tissue is not an obstacle, then fertility patients with immature germ cell arrest could expect to overcome infertility by using this procedure. Moreover, cell culture systems for in vitro spermatogenesis would provide advantages not only to germ cell arrest patients but also to type II SCO syndrome cases or cases with other reproductive pathologies involving faulty sper-matogonial stem cell niches.

Current technology allows, at least on the theoretical level, SCO syndrome patients, who have no germ cells, to achieve the goal of producing offspring that retain their own genetic material. To this end, biotechnology must first provide gametes to help these men overcome their fertility problems. Pluripotent stem cells could be a reliable and plentiful source of immature germ cells to provide a baseline for a differentiation process that eventually will yield spermatozoa in vitro. Pluripotency is the property of a cell to differentiate into somatic cells of ectodermal, endodermal and mesodermal lineages, which constitute the vast majority of the cells in the body (94). It has been demonstrated that some pluripotent stem cells can also generate germ cells. Pluripotent stem cells can be basically obtained from two sources: a) the epiblast region in blastodermic embryos, and b) adult somatic cells. The latter source provides an opportunity for success in the great challenge of obtaining pluripotent stem cells from adult patients, despite the conventional wisdom in cell biology that cells in tissues tend to progress into lineage restrictions during development, gradually reaching terminal differentiation. The idea of somatic pluripotentiation, or reprogramming, has been discussed for quite some time and found original success in mouse models (95). Efforts continued shortly thereafter using human cells (96,97). Only recently, independent research groups (98,99) went a step further to achieve the major breakthrough of defining four basic pluripotency-inducing factors, i.e., Oct4 (pouf1), Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf4, which are required to switch somatic cells into a pluripotent state, thus opening a window for deeper understanding of pluripotency networks, as well as the possibility of generating germ cells, among other cell types, from somatic cells induced to be pluripotent (iPS cells). The availability of such personalized germ cells of somatic origin would be a prerequisite for an in vitro sperm-generating system for SCO patients.

The development of in vitro spermatogenesis has benefited from various animal models, including models that use farm animals. Some culture systems were developed in domestic animal models in which germ cells progressed to advanced steps of spermatogenesis. For instance, Izadyar et al. observed elongated spermatids in a long-term culture of bovine germ cells (70), whereas Dong et al. obtained elongated spermatids from fetal calf gonocyte cultures (100). In these species, the available procedures proved to be rather inefficient because not many terminally differentiated gametes could be derived. In parallel, murine models involving ES (embryonic stem) cells resulted in advances in the field. In principle, germ cell derivation from ES cells does not seem to be practical for infertility patients, as almost no man has access to his own embryonic cells. However, because iPS cells appear to be similar to ES cells (101), and in nature, technically derivable from somatic cells, the resulting scenario becomes very promising to drive them into the production of gametes in vitro. Efforts to generate germ cells and gametes from ES cells and iPS cells in murine models and humans are summarized on Figure 3.

Briefly, three research groups have made advances in the derivation of germ cells from mouse ES cells. One of these groups produced gamete-like cells, and using ICSI as a functional assay, they managed to obtain embryos after fertilization had reached the blastocyst stage (102). Two laboratories were able to generate sperm in vitro (31,103), but only one of them obtained offspring by injecting the derived sperm into donor oocytes using ICSI (31). However, in this case, the offspring production had low efficiency (7 out of 65 embryos), and the mice that were born died prematurely (five months after birth), which suggests developmental aberrations. Progress in germ cell derivation from mouse iPS cells was initially more limited because none of the groups involved could obtain offspring, although PGCs were obtained in one case (104) and gamete-like cells were also recently obtained (105). Recent advances have also been made in humans. PGCs were derived from human ES cells by several groups (30,106,107). Recently, Aflatoonian et al. not only generated PGCs but also derived human spermlike cells (haploid-like cells) for the first time (108). In another recent study, haploid-like cells were produced from human iPS cells (33). Nevertheless, up to now, no human embryos have been generated using these techniques, and the scientific community continues to work together with clinicians to develop rigorous, ethical and secure tests and protocols for these innovative techniques.

The principles underlying these methods are simple enough to allow further progress from experimental to applied status. In summary, pluripotent ES cells are first given a differentiation environment in vitro to produce multiple cell lineages, and then, in a second phase, cells are selected for specific antigen expression or reporter germ cell genes. Also important is the addition of differentiating factors. The current stage of methods for the derivation of human haploid-like cells in vitro allows the generation of gametes with the correct epigenetic status (32,109,110). Taken together, all of the findings presented are genuine biotechnological advances with potential applications in cases of men who present with aspermatogenesis, but regardless of the tremendous potential of these techniques for the derivation of germ cells to produce gametes in vitro using culture techniques, much research remains to be conducted in this area.

GERM STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION AND XENOLOGOUS SYSTEMS

In cases in which the testes of infertile men contain spermatogonia, the stem cell fraction among these premeiotic germ cells could be targeted for fertility preservation. The presence of male germline stem cells indicates high regenerative potential, as these cells can efficiently recolonize the seminiferous tubules, even when the starting population of spermatogonial stem cells is small. When the technique was first applied by Brinster and Zimmermann in 1994 (111), a crude, single-cell suspension containing spermatogonia was infused into the testis. The stem cells migrated into testicular stem cell niches spontaneously, whereas somatic and more differentiated germ cells were flushed out. Recolonization was initiated from individual spermatogonia, which slowly but steadily divided and migrated to repopulate all of the seminiferous tubules (111,112).

The technique of germ cell transplantation could, in principle, be applied across species. Microinjection of germ cell suspensions from rats into the seminiferous tubules of mice led to the initiation of spermatogenesis from donor spermatogonial stem cells. Spermatogonia from less closely related species have the ability to repopulate the testis but will not differentiate, which currently renders the production of primate sperm in mouse testes impossible. Subsequent studies in rodents showed that spermatogonia can be cryopreserved and expanded by in vitro culture prior to germ cell transfer. The clinical potential of this technique was shown in non-human primates and in experimental studies using human testes. Ultrasound-guided infusion of germ cell suspensions via the intratesticular rete testis appears to offer a simple and relatively non-invasive procedure for the autologous infusion of germ cells back into the patient (113). Our preclinical studies have demonstrated the feasibility of transplanting germ cell suspensions into the testes of non-human primates and men (113,114). A first clinical trial was initiated at the Christie Hospital in Manchester, UK, in 1999. The fertility outcomes of the patients in this study have not been yet published (115,116). In conclusion, important issues in achieving re-fertilization through germ cell transplantation include the retrieval of sufficient testicular tissue or in vitro expansion strategies for spermatogonia, prevention of ischemia in the dissected tissues and cells, cryopreservation and thawing of cell suspensions and sorting of tumor cells or enrichment of spermatogonial stem cells. The only issue solved is the ultrasound-guided non-invasive transfer of germ cell suspensions into the rete testis. These critical steps must be optimized by future research before this technique can offer a promising and safe option for the protection of male fertility in men with spermatogonial arrest.

Testicular grafting is an extreme form of organ culture in which the tissue is transplanted into a host. The environment is well controlled, and also the blood supply to the grafted tissue is restored. Immature testicular tissue has a high regenerative capacity and can survive and develop as an auto- or xenograft. In the absence of alternative strategies to generate sperm in vitro, grafting provides an approach to ex-vivo generation of mature sperm. In mice, sperm generated in grafts were capable of generating healthy offspring. We and others have recently shown that xenografting of neonatal and prepubertal testicular tissue from a variety of species permitted the generation of sperm, whereas xenografting of more developed tissue resulted in the degeneration of testicular tissue. We have also shown that immature primate testes can be maintained on ice for 24 hours prior to xenografting and can also be cryopre-served. Grafting will create exciting, clinically applicable strategies for fertility preservation in immature patients. However, fertility problems are usually diagnosed in adulthood, when grafting appears to be a less useful tool for generating sperm. We therefore consider the application of grafting techniques to be more valuable for fertility preservation in children undergoing oncological treatment.

An alternative to achieve germ cell development is the use of xenologous systems, which recapitulate the organo-genesis of a functional testis [for review: Gassei and Schlatt, 2007, (117)]. The male pathway involves regulated cell differentiation of somatic cells within the gonadal primor-dium, including the migration of mesonephric cells and primordial germ cells. Finally, testis cords form and begin to elongate. Tissue engineering approaches that mimic male embryonic gonadogenesis could offer novel ways to study early testicular differentiation (29) and may, when eventually combined with xenografting approaches, also provide scenarios for the differentiation of male germ cells.

HAPLOIDIZATION

In previous sections, several prospective technologies were proposed to overcome the lack of gametes in men with aspermatogenesis. These technologies are based on differentiating preexisting or pluripotential stem cell-derived germ cells in vitro (spermatogenesis in vitro) or on in vivo systems (transplantation and xenografting) to produce sperm.

Haploidization is an alternative approach to manufacture gametes based on biological cloning technology. In cloning, an entire genome is obtained from a single individual when he donates a somatic cell nucleus, which is transferred into an enucleated, developmentally young cell (MII oocyte, zygote, embryo) (118). In contrast, haploidization is a modified cloning technique in which there is a genetic haploid contribution from both parents, which is one reason why this technique has also been called semi-cloning (119,120).

Although promising, this technology has not been successful for generating live normal offspring in murine experimental models, and therefore it remains largely experimental, with no immediate prospects for clinical application. For instance, in preliminary experiments, only 17 to 22% of mouse oocytes "fertilized" with somatic cells formed blastocysts, and no offspring were derived from them (121).

EXPERT COMMENTS

This review article provides an overview of several biotechnological approaches that have the potential to offer solutions for a range of reproductive pathologies that cause sterility in a significant number of azoospermic men, while at the same time providing new tools to contribute to our current knowledge of male reproductive physiology. Although they are thus far experimental, the proposed emerging technologies could work in combination with other already well-established reproductive technologies and take advantage of the requirement for just one healthy spermatozoon to ensure successful fertilization and, hopefully, normal offspring from these individuals.

Thus far, only haploid-like cells, with an apparently correct epigenetic status, have been generated by several research groups. In the near future, we can expect the generation of sperm as the most natural, terminally differentiated cells to be used in assisted reproduction for men afflicted with aspermatogenesis.

Regardless of the pervading optimism, remaining challenges include the verification of aspects such as normal cytogenetics, epigenetic stability, the tumorogenic potential of derived germ cells and even ethical aspects, which should guarantee the correct implementation of these new reproductive technologies. Additionally, the genetic basis for many conditions of aspermatogenesis will necessitate caution, as well as a consideration of the need to develop gene therapies that are specific for these reproductive problems to prevent their transmission to future generations.

KEY ISSUES

• At least 25% of azoospermic men are sterile because their testes either hold only immature or no germ cells at all, a condition that can be collectively termed as aspermato-genesis.

• Possible solutions to aspermatogenesis require biotech-nological approaches to retain biological fatherhood.

• Azoospermic men with germ cell arrests at early stages of spermatogenesis would benefit from sperm derivation in vitro or ex vivo.

• Azoospermic men with type II SCO would have the alternatives of germ cell derivation from a) somatic cells via induced pluripotency or b) haploidization.

• The most challenging differentiation step in an in vitro spermatogenic system is completion of meiosis which has been achieved in several animal models by ex vivo approaches or 3D culture systems.

• In the absence of alternative strategies, testicular grafting (auto- or xenograft) should be considered to ex-vivo generate mature sperm and would be more valuable for fertility preservation in children undergoing oncological treatment.

• Haploidization is a modified cloning technique, in which each parent genetically contributes with a haploid complement, but unfortunately this technique offers no immediate perspective for clinical application.

• Although extensive research has been and continues to be performed, biotechnologies described on this review article still remain largely experimental.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by CNPq and FAPEMIG.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

All of the authors who are listed participated sufficiently in the present review article and therefore take public responsibility for its content.

Received for publication on August 21, 2012

Accepted for publication on August 30, 2012

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

E-mail: [e-mail]

Tel.: [phone]

• 1. Evers JL. Female subfertility. Lancet. 2002;360(9327):151-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09417-5
• 2. Tuttelmann F, Simoni M, Kliesch S, Ledig S, Dworniczak B, Wieacker P, et al. Copy number variants in patients with severe oligozoospermia and Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. PloS one. 2011;6(4):e19426, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019426
• 3. Tuttelmann F, Werny F, Cooper TG, Kliesch S, Simoni M, Nieschlag E. Clinical experience with azoospermia: aetiology and chances for spermatozoa detection upon biopsy. Int J Androl. 2011;34(4):291-8.
• 4. Hamada A, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Unexplained male infertility: potential causes and management. Hum Androl. 2011;1:2-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.XHA.0000397686.82729.09
• 5. McLachlan RI, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Hoei-Hansen CE, de Kretser DM, Skakkebaek NE. Histological evaluation of the human testis -approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: Mini Review. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(1):2-16.
• 6. Anniballo R, Brehm R, Steger K. Recognising the Sertoli-cell-only (SCO) syndrome: a case study. Andrologia. 2011;43(1):78-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0272.2009.01030.x
• 7. Li HG, Wu CL, Gu XL, Xiong CL. A novel application of cell-free seminal mRNA: non-invasive identification of the presence of germ cells or complete obstruction in men with azoospermia. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(4):991-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der481
• 8. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Development of Normal Mice from Oocytes Injected with Secondary Spermatocyte Nuclei. Biol Reprod. 1995; 53(4):855-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod53.4.855
• 9. Ogura A, Suzuki O, Tanemura K, Mochida K, Kobayashi Y, Matsuda J. Development of normal mice from metaphase I oocytes fertilized with primary spermatocytes. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(10):5611-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.10.5611
• 10. Sofikitis N, Mantzavinos T, Loutradis D, Yamamoto Y, Tarlatzis V, Miyagawa I. Ooplasmic injections of secondary spermatocytes for non-obstructive azoospermia. Lancet. 1998;351(9110):1177-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)79121-2
• 11. Aksglaede L, Wikstrom AM, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Dunkel L, Skakkebaek NE, Juul A. Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(1):39-48.
• 12. Yamamoto M, Yokoi K, Katsuno S, Hibi H, Miyake K. A case of sex reversal syndrome with sex-determining region (XX male). Nagoya journal of medical science. 1995;58(3-4):111-5.
• 13. Shapiro CE. Unbalanced chromosomal translocation associated with Sertoli-cell-only histology. J Urol. 1991;145(3):563-4.
• 14. Cacheiro NL, Russell LB, Swartout MS. Translocations, the predominant cause of total sterility in sons of mice treated with mutagens. Genetics. 1974;76(1):73-91.
• 15. Kamp C, Huellen K, Fernandes S, Sousa M, Schlegel PN, Mielnik A, et al. High deletion frequency of the complete AZFa sequence in men with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;7(10):987-94, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/7.10.987
• 16. Yang Y, Ma MY, Xiao CY, Li L, Li SW, Zhang SZ. Massive deletion in AZFb/b plus c and azoospermia with Sertoli cell only and/or maturation arrest. Int J Androl. 2008;31(6):573-8.
• 17. Steinberger A, Steinberger E. In vitro culture of rat testicular cells. Exp Cell Res. 1966;44(2):443-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(66)90451-4
• 18. Goldschmidt R. Some experiments on spermatogenesis in vitro. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1915;1:220-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.L4.220
• 19. Miura T, Yamauchi K, Takahashi H, Nagahama Y. Human Chorionic-Gonadotropin Induces All Stages of Spermatogenesis Invitro in the Male Japanese Eel (Anguilla-Japonica). Dev Biol. 1991;146(1):258-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(91)90468-I
• 20. Miura T, Yamauchi K, Takahashi H, Nagahama Y. Hormonal induction of all stages of spermatogenesis in vitro in the male Japanese eel (Anguilla japonica). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(13):5774-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.13.5774
• 21. Hong Y, Liu T, Zhao H, Xu H, Wang W, Liu R, et al. Establishment of a normal medakafish spermatogonial cell line capable of sperm production in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(21):8011-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308668101
• 22. Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, et al. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature. 2011;471(7339):504-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09850
• 23. Tesarik J, Greco E, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Guido M, Cohen-Bacrie P, et al. Differentiation of spermatogenic cells during in-vitro culture of testicular biopsy samples from patients with obstructive azoospermia: effect of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(10):2772-81, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.10.2772
• 24. Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Awata S, Mawatari Y, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H. Completion of meiosis in human primary spermatocytes through in vitro coculture with Vero cells. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:795-801, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04833-1
• 25. Parvinen M, Wright WW, Phillips DM, Mather JP, Musto NA, Bardin CW. Spermatogenesis Invitro - Completion of Meiosis and Early Spermiogenesis. Endocrinology. 1983;112(3):1150-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo-112-3-1150
• 26. Tres LL, Kierszenbaum AL. Viability of Rat Spermatogenic Cells-Invitro Is Facilitated by Their Co-Culture with Sertoli Cells in Serum-Free Hormone-Supplemented Medium. P Natl Acad Sci-Biol. 1983;80(11): 3377-81, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.11.3377
• 27. Oatley JM, de Avila DM, Reeves JJ, McLean DJ. Testis tissue explant culture supports survival and proliferation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;70(3):625-31.
• 28. Lee JH, Kim HJ, Kim H, Lee SJ, Gye MC. In vitro spermatogenesis by three-dimensional culture of rat testicular cells in collagen gel matrix. Biomaterials. 2006;27(14):2845-53, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.028
• 29. Gassei K, Ehmcke J, Schlatt S. Initiation of testicular tubulogenesis is controlled by neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinases in a three-dimensional Sertoli cell aggregation assay. Reproduction. 2008; 136(4):459-69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-08-0241
• 30. Tilgner K, Atkinson SP, Golebiewska A, Stojkovic M, Lako M, Armstrong L. Isolation of Primordial Germ Cells from Differentiating Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26(12):3075-85, http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2008-0289
• 31. Nayernia K, Nolte J, Michelmann HW, Lee JH, Rathsack K, Drusenheimer N, et al. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Dev Cell. 2006;11(1):125-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006.05.010
• 32. Medrano JV, Ramathal C, Nguyen HN, Simon C, Pera RAR. Divergent RNA-Binding Proteins, DAZL and VASA, Induce Meiotic Progression in Human Germ Cells Derived In Vitro. Stem Cells. 2012;30(3):441-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.1012
• 33. Eguizabal C, Montserrat N, Vassena R, Barragan M, Garreta E, Garcia-Quevedo L, et al. Complete Meiosis from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2011;29(8):1186-95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/stem.672
• 34. Hogarth CA, Griswold MD. The key role of vitamin A in spermatogen-esis. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(4):956-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI41303
• 35. van Pelt AM, Morena AR, van Dissel-Emiliani FM, Boitani C, Gaemers IC, de Rooij DG, et al. Isolation of the synchronized A spermatogonia from adult vitamin A-deficient rat testes. Biol Reprod. 1996;55(2):439-44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod55.2.439
• 36. Schrans-Stassen BH, van de Kant HJ, de Rooij DG, van Pelt AM. Differential expression of c-kit in mouse undifferentiated and differentiating type A spermatogonia. Endocrinology. 1999;140(12):5894-900, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.140.12.5894
• 37. Feng LX, Chen Y, Dettin L, Pera RA, Herr JC, Goldberg E, et al. Generation and in vitro differentiation of a spermatogonial cell line. Science. 2002;297(5580):392-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1073162
• 38. Tajima Y, Watanabe D, Koshimizu U, Matsuzawa T, Nishimune Y. Insulin-like growth factor-I and transforming growth factor-alpha stimulate differentiation of type A spermatogonia in organ culture of adult mouse cryptorchid testes. Int J Androl. 1995;18(1):8-12.
• 39. Walker WH, Cheng J. FSH and testosterone signaling in Sertoli cells. Reproduction. 2005;130(1):15-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.L00358
• 40. Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. The effect of FSH on male germ cell survival and differentiation in vitro is mimicked by pentoxifylline but not insulin. Mol Hum Reprod. 2000;6(10):877-81, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/6.10.877
• 41. Godet M, Sabido O, Gilleron J, Durand P. Meiotic progression of rat spermatocytes requires mitogen-activated protein kinases of Sertoli cells and close contacts between the germ cells and the Sertoli cells. Dev Biol. 2008;315(1):173-88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.12.019
• 42. Aponte PM, Soda T, van de Kant HJ, de Rooij DG. Basic features of bovine spermatogonial culture and effects of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Theriogenology. 2006;65(9):1828-47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.10.020
• 43. Aponte PM, Soda T, Teerds KJ, Mizrak SC, van de Kant HJ, de Rooij DG. Propagation of bovine spermatogonial stem cells in vitro. Reproduction. 2008;136(5):543-57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0419
• 44. Kierszenbaum AL. Mammalian spermatogenesis in vivo and in vitro: a partnership of spermatogenic and somatic cell lineages. Endocr Rev. 1994;15(1):116-34.
• 45. Stukenborg JB, Schlatt S, Simoni M, Yeung CH, Elhija MA, Luetjens CM, et al. New horizons for in vitro spermatogenesis? An update on novel three-dimensional culture systems as tools for meiotic and post-meiotic differentiation of testicular germ cells. Mol Hum Reprod. 2009;15(9): 521-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gap052
• 46. Stukenborg JB, Wistuba J, Luetjens CM, Elhija MA, Huleihel M, Lunenfeld E, et al. Coculture of spermatogonia with somatic cells in a novel three-dimensional soft-agar-culture-system. J Androl. 2008;29(3):312-29.
• 47. Abu Elhija M, Lunenfeld E, Schlatt S, Huleihel M. Differentiation of murine male germ cells to spermatozoa in a soft agar culture system. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(2):285-93.
• 48. Castrillon DH, Quade BJ, Wang TY, Quigley C, Crum CP. The human VASA gene is specifically expressed in the germ cell lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(17):9585-90,
• 49. Wu X, Schmidt JA, Avarbock MR, Tobias JW, Carlson CA, Kolon TF, et al. Prepubertal human spermatogonia and mouse gonocytes share conserved gene expression of germline stem cell regulatory molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(51):21672-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912432106
• 50. Oatley MJ, Kaucher AV, Racicot KE, Oatley JM. Inhibitor of DNA binding 4 is expressed selectively by single spermatogonia in the male germline and regulates the self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells in mice. Biol Reprod. 2011;85(2):347-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.091330
• 51. Oatley JM, Oatley MJ, Avarbock MR, Tobias JW, Brinster RL. Colony stimulating factor 1 is an extrinsic stimulator of mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Development. 2009;136(7):1191-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.032243
• 52. Tsuda M, Sasaoka Y, Kiso M, Abe K, Haraguchi S, Kobayashi S, et al. Conserved role of nanos proteins in germ cell development. Science. 2003;301(5637):1239-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1085222
• 53. Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cells share some, but not all, phenotypic and functional characteristics with other stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(11):6487-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0631767100
• 54. van Bragt MP, Roepers-Gajadien HL, Korver CM, Bogerd J, Okuda A, Eggen BJ, et al. Expression of the pluripotency marker UTF1 is restricted to a subpopulation of early A spermatogonia in rat testis. Reproduction. 2008;136(1):33-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0536
• 55. Grisanti L, Falciatori I, Grasso M, Dovere L, Fera S, Muciaccia B, et al. Identification of spermatogonial stem cell subsets by morphological analysis and prospective isolation. Stem Cells. 2009;27(12):3043-52.
• 56. Zheng K, Wu X, Kaestner KH, Wang PJ. The pluripotency factor LIN28 marks undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse. BMC Dev Biol. 2009;9:38, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-213X-9-38
• 57. Yoshida S. Stem cells in mammalian spermatogenesis. Dev Growth Differ. 2010;52(3):311-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01174.x
• 58. Tokuda M, Kadokawa Y, Kurahashi H, Marunouchi T. CDH1 is a specific marker for undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 2007;76(1):130-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.053181
• 59. Seandel M, Falciatori I, Shmelkov SV, Kim J, James D, Rafii S. Niche players: spermatogonial progenitors marked by GPR125. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(2):135-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.2.5248
• 60. Ballow DJ, Xin Y, Choi Y, Pangas SA, Rajkovic A. Sohlh2 is a germ cell-specific bHLH transcription factor. Gene Expr Patterns. 2006;6(8):1014-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.modgep.2006.04.007
• 61. Ebata KT, Zhang X, Nagano MC. Expression patterns of cell-surface molecules on male germ line stem cells during postnatal mouse development. Mol Reprod Dev. 2005;72(2):171-81, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20324
• 62. Oatley JM, Avarbock MR, Telaranta AI, Fearon DT, Brinster RL. Identifying genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(25):9524-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603332103
• 63. Raverot G, Weiss J, Park SY, Hurley L, Jameson JL. Sox3 expression in undifferentiated spermatogonia is required for the progression of spermatogenesis. . Dev Biol. 2005;283(1):215-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.04.013
• 64. Eildermann K, Aeckerle N, Debowski K, Godmann M, Christiansen H, Heistermann M, et al. Developmental Expression of the Pluripotency Factor Sal-Like Protein 4 in the Monkey, Human and Mouse Testis: Restriction to Premeiotic Germ Cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2012;196(3):206-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000335031
• 65. Lachance C, Fortier M, Thimon V, Sullivan R, Bailey JL, Leclerc P. Localization of Hsp60 and Grp78 in the human testis, epididymis and mature spermatozoa. Int J Androl. 2010;33(1):33-44.
• 66. He ZP, Kokkinaki M, Jiang JJ, Dobrinski I, Dym M. Isolation, Characterization, and Culture of Human Spermatogonia. Biol Reprod. 2010;82(2):363-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.109.078550
• 67. Unni E, Mayerhofer A, Zhang Y, Bhatnagar YM, Russell LD, Meistrich ML. Increased Accessibility of the N-Terminus of Testis-Specific Histone Th2b to Antibodies in Elongating Spermatids. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;42(2):210-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080420210
• 68. Hue D, Staub C, Perrard-Sapori MH, Weiss M, Nicolle JC, Vigier M, et al. Meiotic differentiation of germinal cells in three-week cultures of whole cell population from rat seminiferous tubules. Biol Reprod. 1998;59(2):379-87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod59.2.379
• 69. Jimenez A, Zu W, Rawe VY, Pelto-Huikko M, Flickinger CJ, Sutovsky P, et al. Spermatocyte/spermatid-specific thioredoxin-3, a novel Golgi apparatus-associated thioredoxin, is a specific marker of aberrant spermatogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(33):34971-82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M404192200
• 70. Izadyar F, den Ouden K, Creemers LB, Posthuma G, Parvinen M, de Rooij DG. Proliferation and differentiation of bovine type A sperma-togonia during long-term culture. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(1):272-81.
• 71. Ko E, Martin RH. Immunofluorescence analysis of human spermato-cytes. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;558:401-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-103-5_23
• 72. Alfonso PJ, Kistler WS. Immunohistochemical localization of spermatid nuclear transition protein 2 in the testes of rats and mice. Biol Reprod. 1993;48(3):522-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod48.3.522
• 73. Steger K, Klonisch T, Gavenis K, Drabent B, Doenecke D, Bergmann M. Expression of mRNA and protein of nucleoproteins during human spermiogenesis. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(10):939-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/4.10.939
• 74. Steger K, Fink L, Klonisch T, Bohle RM, Bergmann M. Protamine-1 and-2 mRNA in round spermatids is associated with RNA-binding proteins. Histochem Cell Biol. 2002;117(3):227-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00418-002-0385-3
• 75. Steger K, Behr R, Kleiner I, Weinbauer GF, Bergmann M. Expression of activator of CREM in the testis (ACT) during normal and impaired spermatogenesis: correlation with CREM expression. Molecular human reproduction. 2004;10(2):129-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gah012
• 76. Wassler M, Syntin P, Sutton-Walsh HG, Hsia N, Hardy DM, Cornwall GA. Identification and characterization of cystatin-related epididymal spermatogenic protein in human spermatozoa: Localization in the equatorial segment. Biol Reprod. 2002;67(3):795-803, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.003970
• 77. Salemi M, Calogero AE, Di Benedetto D, Cosentino A, Barone N, Rappazzo G, et al. Expression of SPANX proteins in human-ejaculated spermatozoa and sperm precursors. Int J Androl. 2004;27(3):134-9.
• 78. Behr R, Deller C, Godmann M, Muller T, Bergmann M, Ivell R, et al. Kruppel-like factor 4 expression in normal and pathological human testes. Mol Hum Reprod. 2007;13(11):815-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gam064
• 79. Kurth BE, Klotz K, Flickinger CJ, Herr JC. Localization of sperm antigen SP-10 during the six stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in man. Biol Reprod. 1991;44(5):814-21, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod44.5.814
• 80. Zhang YQ, He XZ, Zhang JS, Wang RA, Zhou J, Xu RJ. Stage-specific localization of transforming growth factor beta1 and beta3 and their receptors during spermatogenesis in men. Asian J Androl. 2004;6(2):105-9.
• 81. De los Reyes M, Barros C. Immunolocalization of proacrosin/acrosin in bovine sperm and sperm penetration through the zona pellucida. Anim Reprod Sci. 2000;58(3-4):215-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00077-9
• 82. Habermann B, Mi HF, Edelmann A, Bohring C, Backert IT, Kiesewetter F, et al. DAZ (Deleted in AZoospermia) genes encode proteins located in human late spermatids and in sperm tails. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(2):363-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.2.363
• 83. Sharpe RM, McKinnell C, Kivlin C, Fisher JS. Proliferation and functional maturation of Sertoli cells, and their relevance to disorders of testis function in adulthood. Reproduction. 2003;125(6):769-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1250769
• 84. Kruse R, Eigelshoven S, Kaiser A, Ruzicka T, Neumann NJ. Cytokeratin 18 expression in immature Sertoli cells: Co-localization with interstitial lymphocytic infiltrates. Folia Histochem Cyto. 2009;47(1):127-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10042-009-0009-z
• 85. Morrow CMK, Mruk D, Cheng CY, Hess RA. Claudin and occludin expression and function in the seminiferous epithelium. Philos T R Soc B. 2010;365(1546):1679-96.
• 86. Franke WW, Grund C, Schmid E. Intermediate-Sized Filaments Present in Sertoli Cells Are of the Vimentin Type. Eur J Cell Biol. 1979;19(3):269-75.
• 87. Devkota B, Sasaki M, Takahash KI, Matsuzaki S, Matsui M, Haneda S, et al. Postnatal developmental changes in immunohistochemical localization of alpha-smooth muscle actin (SMA) and vimentin in bovine testes. J Reprod Develop. 2006;52(1):43-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1262/jrd.17062
• 88. Buzzard JJ, Wreford NG, Morrison JR. Thyroid hormone, retinoic acid, and testosterone suppress proliferation and induce markers of differentiation in cultured rat Sertoli cells. Endocrinology. 2003;144(9):3722-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.2003-0379
• 89. Balvers M, Spiess AN, Domagalski R, Hunt N, Kilic E, Mukhopadhyay AK, et al. Relaxin-like factor expression as a marker of differentiation in the mouse testis and ovary. Endocrinology. 1998;139(6):2960-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/en.139.6.2960
• 90. Dupont E, Luuthe V, Labrie F, Pelletier G. Light Microscopic Immunocytochemical Localization of 3-Beta-Hydroxy-5-Ene-Steroid Dehydrogenase Delta-5-Delta-4-Isomerase in the Gonads and Adrenal-Glands of the Guinea-Pig. Endocrinology. 1990;126(6):2906-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo-126-6-2906
• 91. Dupont E, Zhao HF, Rheaume E, Simard J, Luuthe V, Labrie F, et al. Localization of 3-Beta-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Delta-5-Delta-4-Isomerase in Rat Gonads and Adrenal-Glands by Immunocytochemistry and Insitu Hybridization. Endocrinology. 1990;127(3):1394-403, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo-127-3-1394
• 92. Teerds KJ, de Boer-Brouwer M, Dorrington JH, Balvers M, Ivell R. Identification of markers for precursor and Leydig cell differentiation in the adult rat testis following ethane dimethyl sulphonate administration. Biol Reprod. 1999;60(6):1437-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod60.6.1437
• 93. Tung PS, Fritz IB. Characterization of Rat Testicular Peritubular Myoid Cells in Culture - Alpha-Smooth Muscle Isoactin Is a Specific Differentiation Marker. Biol Reprod. 1990;42(2):351-65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod42.2.351
• 94. Greenow K, Clarke AR. Controlling the Stem Cell Compartment and Regeneration in Vivo: The Role of Pluripotency Pathways. Physiol Rev. 2012;92(1):75-99, http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00040.2010
• 95. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024
• 96. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019
• 97. Yu JY, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1151526
• 98. Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse fibroblasts by four transcription factors. Cell Prolif. 2008;41 Suppl 1:51-6.
• 99. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Ince TA, et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature. 2008;451(7175):141-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06534
• 100. Dong WZ, Hua JL, Shen WZ, Dou ZY. In vitro production of haploid sperm cells from male germ cells of foetal cattle. Anim Reprod Sci. 2010;118(2-4):103-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.018
• 101. Yee J. Turning Somatic Cells into Pluripotent Stem Cells. Nature Education. 2010;3(9):25.
• 102. Geijsen N, Horoschak M, Kim K, Gribnau J, Eggan K, Daley GQ. Derivation of embryonic germ cells and male gametes from embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2004;427(6970):148-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02247
• 103. Toyooka Y, Tsunekawa N, Akasu R, Noce T. Embryonic stem cells can form germ cells in vitro. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(20):11457-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1932826100
• 104. Imamura M, Aoi T, Tokumasu A, Mise N, Abe K, Yamanaka S, et al. Induction of Primordial Germ Cells From Mouse Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Derived From Adult Hepatocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2010;77(9):802-11, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21223
• 105. Zhu Y, Hu HL, Li P, Yang S, Zhang W, Ding H, et al. Generation of male germ cells from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS cells): an in vitro and in vivo study. Asian J Androl. 2012;14(4):574-9.
• 106. Tilgner K, Atkinson SP, Yung S, Golebiewska A, Stojkovic M, Moreno R, et al. Expression of GFP Under the Control of the RNA Helicase VASA Permits Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting Isolation of Human Primordial Germ Cells. Stem Cells. 2010;28(1):84-92.
• 107. Bucay N, Yebra M, Cirulli V, Afrikanova I, Kaido T, Hayek A, et al. A Novel Approach for the Derivation of Putative Primordial Germ Cells and Sertoli Cells from Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(1):68-77, http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-1018
• 108. Aflatoonian B, Ruban L, Jones M, Aflatoonian R, Fazeli A, Moore HD. In vitro post-meiotic germ cell development from human embryonic stem cells. Human Reproduction. 2009;24(12):3150-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep334
• 109. Panula S, Medrano JV, Kee K, Bergstrom R, Ha NN, Byers B, et al. Human germ cell differentiation from fetal- and adult-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(4):752-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq520
• 110. Kee K, Angeles VT, Flores M, Nguyen HN, Pera RAR. Human DAZL, DAZ and BOULE genes modulate primordial germ-cell and haploid gamete formation. Nature. 2009;462(7270):222-U95, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08562
• 111. Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis Following Male Germ-Cell Transplantation. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(24):11298-302, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11298
• 112. Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germline Transmission of Donor Haplotype Following Spermatogonial Transplantation. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(24):11303-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.24.11303
• 113. Schlatt S, Rosiepen G, Weinbauer GF, Rolf C, Brook PF, Nieschlag E. Germ cell transfer into rat, bovine, monkey and human testes. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):144-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.1.144
• 114. Schlatt S, Foppiani L, Rolf C, Weinbauer GF, Nieschlag E. Germ cell transplantation into X-irradiated monkey testes. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):55-62, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.1.55
• 115. Radford J, Shalet S, Lieberman B. Fertility after treatment for cancer. Questions remain over ways of preserving ovarian and testicular tissue. BMJ. 1999;319(7215):935-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7215.935
• 116. Radford J. Restoration of fertility after treatment for cancer. Horm Res. 2003;59 Suppl 1:21-3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000067840
• 117. Gassei K, Schlatt S. Testicular morphogenesis: comparison of in vivo and in vitro models to study male gonadal development. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1120:152-67, http://dx.doi.org/10.1196/annals.1411.015
• 118. Campbell KH, Fisher P, Chen WC, Choi I, Kelly RD, Lee JH, et al. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: Past, present and future perspectives. Theriogenology. 2007;68 Suppl 1:S214-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.059
• 119. Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental origin. Reconstitution of gametes for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):473-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg080
• 120. Tesarik J. Reproductive semi-cloning respecting biparental embryo origin - Embryos from syngamy between a gamete and a haploidized somatic cell. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(8):1933-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.8.1933
• 121. Lacham-Kaplan O, Daniels R, Trounson A. Fertilization of mouse oocytes using somatic cells as male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online 2001;3(3):205-211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62037-8

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  11 Mar 2013
• Date of issue
  2013

History

• Received
  21 Aug 2012
• Accepted
  30 Aug 2012