Abstract
The phylogenetic affinities of early dinosaurs are a controversial topic. There are disputing scenarios aiming to explain the evolutionary tree of these reptiles. A number of factors play a role on this issue. High levels of intraspecific variation experienced by the earliest forms are pointed by distinct authors as one of the main sources of phylogenetic biases. In the present study, we performed experimental analyses incorporating skeletally immature individuals as distinct operational taxonomic units in order to investigate the effect of ontogeny on the phylogeny and morphospace of early Late Triassic sauropodomorphs. The results support an “artificial” grouping of skeletally immature individuals of early dinosaurs in the phylogenetic trees, which is controlled by ontogenetic development. Such results are interpreted as the effect of ontogenetic control on the states of certain morphological characters, producing false synapomorphies. In addition, the morphological disparity analysis indicated a significant difference between the skeletally immature and mature individuals, corroborating previous assumptions. At this point, we suggest caution during the scoring process of early dinosaurs. Some approaches that avoid ontogenetically sensitive characters revealed a putative solution. Nevertheless, additional specimens and alternative tools are mandatory in order to properly deal with this issue.
Key words
Cladistics; Dinosauria; phylogenetics; ontogeny; Saurischia; Sauropodomorpha
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
