ENDOMETRIOSE INTESTINAL: RESULTADOS DE UM CENTRO DE REFERÊNCIA MULTIDISCIPILINAR ESPECIALIZADO

Arq Bras Cir Dig abcd ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) ABCD, arq. bras. cir. dig. 0102-6720 2317-6326 Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva RESUMO RACIONAL: A endometriose profunda infiltrativa (EP) pode afetar órgãos abdominais e pélvicos, tais como o intestino e a bexiga, necessitando de tratamento para aliviar os sintomas. OBJETIVOS: Estudar e investigar resultados clínicos e cirúrgicos em pacientes com diagnóstico de EP envolvendo o intestino, visando analisar a eficácia dos tratamentos cirúrgicos. MÉTODOS: Foram incluídos todos os casos atendidos de janeiro de 2021 a julho de 2023, com foco em pacientes com 18 anos ou mais com a doença acometendo o intestino. Foram excluídos pacientes sem comprometimento intestinal e aqueles com menos de seis meses de acompanhamento pós-operatório. O envolvimento intestinal foi definido como invasão direta da parede intestinal ou necessidade de lise de aderências para ressecção completa. Os desfechos primários foram lise de aderências, raspagem retal e excisão discóide (grupo não colectomia), e ressecção segmentar (grupo colectomia), juntamente com complicações cirúrgicas como fístulas, monitoradas por até 30 dias. RESULTADOS: Das 169 pacientes com EP tratadas cirurgicamente, 76 preencheram os critérios de inclusão. Não foi indicado colectomia em 50 (65,7%) pacientes, enquanto 26 (34,2%) foram submetidos à retossigmoidectomia (RTS). A diarreia durante a menstruação foi o sintoma mais prevalente no grupo RTS (19,2% vs. 6,0%, p<0,001). Os resultados cirúrgicos indicaram tempos operatórios e internações hospitalares mais longos para o grupo de ressecção segmentar, respectivamente, 186,5 vs. 104 min (p<0,001) e 4 vs. 2 dias, (p<0,001). As complicações graves (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) tiveram prevalência global de 6 (7,9%) casos, sem diferença entre os grupos. Não houve mortalidade relatada. Lesões mais graves e sintomas específicos como disquezia e sangramento retal foram associados a maior probabilidade de indicação de RTS. A regressão bayesiana destacou a diarreia próxima à menstruação como um forte preditor de ressecção segmentar. CONCLUSÕES: Em pacientes com endometriose envolvendo os intestinos, sintomas como disquezia, sangramento retal e diarreia relacionada ao período menstrual predizem a indicação de RTS. No entanto, as taxas de complicações graves não diferiram significativamente entre o grupo de ressecção segmentar e o grupo sem colectomia. INTRODUCTION Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial-like tissue, estrogen dependent outside the uterus that induces a chronic inflammatory reaction. It is the second most common benign gynecological condition in women of reproductive age, affecting around 7–15% of the female population. The true pathogenesis of endometriosis remains unclear. The most accepted is the retrograde menstruation reflux hypothesis. Other hypotheses are the theories of celomic metaplasia, the trafficking of stem cells, and the embryonic rests which have also been proposed and are under investigation. All these possibilities only confirm that endometriosis is a complex disease and probably of multifactorial origin29. When the endometrial tissue is found more than 5 mm below the peritoneal surface it is called deep endometriosis (DE). The prevalence is estimated at around 5–12% in women with pelvic endometriosis. The DE may affect the bowel, bladder, ureters, pelvic nerves, omentum, and diaphragm, and even translocate to the chest22. The most frequent site of extragenital endometriosis is along the bowel, more specifically in the upper rectum (90% of the cases), in contiguity with lesions that influence the uterus, but it can be present anywhere along the lower gastrointestinal tract. The implants usually affect the serous layer, but eventually may manifest as deeply infiltrative lesions of the muscularis and more rarely the mucosa layer, causing retractile thickening and fibrosis of the bowel wall. These endometrial implants can be identified by endoscopic methods. The estimated incidence of colorectal endometriosis in patients with DE varies between 5–38%. At least half of patients with rectal lesions develop a second intestinal lesion12,18. A long diagnostic delay after symptom onset is common. The main gynecological symptoms are dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, deep dyspareunia, and infertility25. Patients with intestinal endometriosis present with symptoms including diarrhea, constipation, tenesmus, dyschezia, and rectal bleeding. Symptoms are usually synchronous with menstruation, but they can occur apart from the menstrual period. Patients suspected of having endometriosis should have a thorough physical examination and complementary diagnostic tests, such as transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) performed after bowel preparation, pelvic and upper magnetic resonance (MRI), endorectal ultrasound, and colonoscopy20. The goals of the treatment of DE are to recover fertility, relieve symptoms, and improve quality of life, while preventing possible complications such as intestinal obstruction9. Medical management including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, oral contraceptives, progesterone, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs has some effectiveness and may be advisable for those who are not surgical candidates or who prefer to avoid surgery. However, patients with DE may require surgical treatment when symptoms exacerbate. Surgical treatment is an option after failure of medical treatment, in case of progressive lesions, or in case of patients with impaired sexual and/or reproductive functions. It is currently considered the first option in symptomatic patients with invasive intestinal compromise, as it leads to lasting relief of symptoms and improvement in quality of life3. Several minimally invasive approaches have been described to treat DE with intestinal involvement (bowel resection, disc excision and intestinal shaving). The aim of this study was to identify the characteristics of patients with DE with intestinal involvement, the type of intestinal resection performed, as well as the main outcomes, and the risk factors for complications in a multidisciplinary specialized referral center. METHODS In January 2021, the Endometriosis Center at Hospital São Luiz Rede D’or Osasco was created with the aim of treating patients with deep endometriosis. The center is composed of two gynecologists, a gastrointestinal surgeon, a radiologist, a nurse, a psychologist, and a dietician. All cases included were conducted by the same surgical team, in a tertiary, specialized hospital between January 2021 and July 2023. Cohort abstraction This is a retrospective study of consecutive cases of DE patients with intestinal involvement treated in a single specialized center. All clinical data came from our prospectively collected database. All cases operated between January 2021 and July 2023 were considered. Inclusion criteria comprised patients 18 years and older and diagnosed with DE with intestinal involvement. Patients without intestinal involvement and with less than 6-month follow-up after surgery were excluded from the analysis. The intestinal involvement was considered whenever there was a direct invasion of the intestinal wall, or at least, an adhesion lysis was necessary to accomplish the complete resection. Preoperative evaluation included laboratorial tests, TVUS, upper abdominal and pelvic MRI, and colonoscopy in all cases. Endorectal ultrasound was performed in selected cases. All patients received nutritional and psychological support. Patients were classified by the American Anesthesiology Association (ASA) scoring system21. Perioperative complications were described according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Clavien-Dindo complications ≥3 were considered severe14. Surgical mortality was considered when death occurred within 90 days of surgery. All patients underwent retrograde bowel preparation with enemas the day before surgery. Before anesthetic induction, antibiotic prophylaxis with intravenous Cefazolin was given. When segmental resection was necessary, a small Pfannenstiel incision was performed to remove the surgical specimen. The extent of intestinal resection (rectal or colonic resection, disc excision, rectal shaving, enterectomy, and/or appendectomy) was based on the location of the disease to obtain free margins. Mechanical anastomosis with a 31- or 33-mm circular stapler was used in patients submitted to rectal segmental resection or disc excision. All patients were operated by laparoscopy. Patients undergoing no-colectomy surgery received a liquid oral diet on the same day of the procedure. Those who underwent RTS received the diet on the first postoperative day. The predictors analyzed included gynecological and any intestinal symptoms, onset of symptoms before diagnosis, hospital length of stay, 30-day hospital readmission, operative time, pregnancy history, and previous endometriosis treatments. The type of gynecological surgery performed, the type of intestinal resection, and the size of the intestinal lesions removed were also analyzed. The main outcomes of interest were the performance of RTS vs. no-colectomy surgery (including adhesion lysis, rectal shaving, and disc excision), and the incidence of surgical complications (including anastomotic leak, fistulas, vaginal wall dehiscence, or ureter lesion). All outcomes were censored at 30 days. The study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee and registered in the “Plataforma Brasil” under Certificate of Presentation for Ethical Appreciation (CAAE) 75922723.8.0000.5374. Statistical analysis Two sample t-tests and proportion tests were applied to analyze demographic differences between the two groups. Bayesian model averaging for linear regression was utilized to build a variable inclusion map exploring the importance of predictors for surgical complications and RTS. Chi-squared tests and linear regression were used to estimate unadjusted risk ratios and coefficients (coef) for the outcomes of interest. Adjusted risk ratios (aRR) were obtained through Poisson regression after adjusting for age, previous clinical conditions, ASA score, previous operation for endometriosis, and duration of symptoms. Multiple linear regression model was used to obtain coefficients to analyze the correlation between the duration of symptoms and outcomes of interest. The analysis was conducted on Stata Statistics version 18 Standard Edition. RESULTS Demographics One hundred and sixty-nine DE patients were surgically treated during the study period. Of these, 93 did not meet the inclusion criteria (no intestinal involvement) and were excluded from the analysis. Our final cohort consisted of 76 female patients. The median age was 39.8 years (range 24–50). The median duration of symptoms onset until final diagnosis was 20 months (range 0–240). The final analysis was performed by dividing our cohort between patients who were treated without colectomy (including only adhesion lysis, rectal shaving, or disc excision) versus patients who underwent segmental resection (RTS cases). The no-colectomy cohort consisted of 50 (65.7%) patients, while 26 (34.2%) underwent RTS. The most common gynecological symptom was pelvic pain in 52 (68.4%) patients, followed by dysmenorrhea affecting 49 (64.4%), and dyspareunia in 37 (48.6%). Pelvic pain was also the most frequent symptom in the no-colectomy group (74.0% vs. 61.5%; p=0.020; p<0.050). Twenty-five patients (32.8%) reported previous medical treatment for endometriosis (including oral progestin-based contraceptives, hormonal intrauterine devices, or long-acting protein implants). Sixteen patients (21%) had at least one previous surgery for endometriosis. Intestinal symptoms Intestinal symptoms were present in 25 (32.8%) patients. The most common symptoms observed were constipation in 14 (18.4%) patients, followed by dyschezia in 11 (14.4%), and diarrhea close to the menstrual period in 8 (10.5%). The presence of diarrhea during the menstrual period was statistically significantly more prevalent in the segmental resection group (19.2% vs. 6.0%; p<0.001). The clinical characteristics of all patients are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics in the cohort of 76 patients. Variables All patients No-colectomy group Segmental resection group p-value n (%) 76 (100) 50 (65.8) 26 (34.2) Age (years) mean (IQR) or (range) 39.8 (34–43) (24–50) 39 (7.8) (24–59) 40.5 (5.8) (30–55) 0.386 Duration of symptoms (months) 20 (12–24) (0–240) 33 (43.3) (3–240) 30 (28.3) (0–120) 0.067 Dysmenorrhea 49 (64.4) 32 (64) 17 (65.3) 0.868 Dyspareunia 37 (48.6) 23 (46) 14 (53.8) 0.281 Pelvic pain 52 (68.4) 37 (74) 16 (61.5) 0.020 Infertility 15 (19.7) 12 (24) 3 (11.5) 0.200 Abnormal uterine bleed 13 (23.2) 8 (16) 5 (19.2) 0.727 C-section (1 or more) 32 (42.1) 19 (38) 13 (50.0) 0.628 Pregnancy history (1 or more) 39 (51.3) 26 (52) 13 (50.0) 0.670 Abortion (1 or more) 6 (7.8) 6 (12) 0 0.065 Back pain 5 (6.5) 3 (6) 2 (7.6) 0.670 Dyschezia 11 (14.4) 5 (10) 6 (23.0) 0.128 Tenesmus 2 (2.6) 2 (4) 0 0.308 Constipation 14 (18.4) 11 (22) 3 (11.5) 0.211 Diarrhea 8 (10.5) 3 (6) 5 (19.2) <0.001 Hematochezia 1 (1.3) 0 1 (3.8) 0.167 ASA score 1 51 (67.1) 35 (70) 16 (61.5) 0.463 ASA score 2 25 (32.8) 15 (30) 10 (38.4) 0.463 Previous surgery for endometriosis 16 (21.0) 11 (22) 5 (19.2) 0.378 Previous medical treatment 25 (32.8) 18 (36) 7 (26.9) 0.182 Data given in median (IQR: interquartile range) or n (%); ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists. Surgical outcomes The overall median operative time was 133.5 min (range 45–401). The overall median hospital length of stay was 2 days (range 1–9). The operative time and length of hospital stay were longer in the segmental resection group when compared to the no-colectomy group, respectively, 186.5 min (range 115–305) vs. 104 min (range 45–401), p<0.001, and 4 days (range 2–6) vs. 2 days (range 1–9), p<0.001. In 3 (3.9%) patients more than one type of resection was necessary (disc excision + shaving). Enterectomy was performed in 5 (6.5%) and appendectomy in 14 (18.4%). A diverting ileostomy was necessary in one (1.3%) patient due to stapling failure. Thirty-one patients (40.7%) underwent concurrent hysterectomy. Performing hysterectomy was significantly more prevalent in the no-colectomy group (48.0% vs. 30.7%; p<0.001). The presence of retrocervical/uterine torus nodes had an overall prevalence in 53 (69.7%) patients, being more frequently observed in the no-colectomy group (74.0% vs. 61.5%; p=0.020). Thorough distal ureter dissection to complete removal of all lesions was necessary in 14 (18.4%) patients. Of those, the left ureter was the most affected (71.4%). In one patient there was a direct invasion of the left ureter and a ureter resection with primary anastomosis was performed. Although there was no complication regarding the anastomosis, two cystoscopies were necessary for repositioning the double-J stent. Twenty-four (31.5%) patients had nodules in the vesicouterine recess. In 7 (36.8%) of those, there was direct invasion of the bladder wall. Hospital readmission was necessary for 8 (10.5%) patients. The overall morbidity rate was 31.6% (24 patients). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred in 6 cases (7.9%), and other surgical morbidity in 5 (6.5%). Reoperation was necessary in 2 (2.6%) patients (new vaginal dome suturing). One of these patients developed pulmonary thromboembolism and presented with vaginal bleeding after full anticoagulation therapy. There were 2 (2.6%) cases of fistulas treated conservatively (one rectovaginal and another ureterovaginal). Finally, one patient developed sepsis due to urinary tract infection. There were no conversions to open surgery and no 90-day mortality. Surgical outcomes are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Surgical outcomes in the cohort of 76 patients with endometriosis. Variables All patients Segmental resection group No-colectomy group p-value n (%) 76 (100) 26 (34.2) 50 (65.8) Operative time (minutes) (range) 133 (45–401) 186.5 (115–305) 104 (45–401) <0.001 In hospital stay (days) 2 (1–9) 4 (2–6) 2 (1–9) <0.001 Enterectomy 5 (6.5) 0 5 (10) >0.050 Appendectomy 14 (18.4) 4 (15.3) 10 (20) 0.296 Omentum 1 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 0 >0.050 Diaphragm 1 (1.3) 1 (1.3) 0 >0.050 Hysterectomy 32 (42.1) 8 (30.7) 24 (48) <0.001 Right ovarian 22 (28.9) 7 (26.9) 15 (30) 0.385 Left ovarian 28 (26.8) 9 (34.6) 19 (38) 0.614 Retrocervical/uterine torus 53 (69.7) 16 (61.5) 37 (74) 0.020 Vaginal dome 6 (7.8) 1 (3.8) 5 (10) >0.050 Vesicouterine recess 24 (31.5) 9 (34.6) 15 (30) 0.639 Bladder 7 (9.2) 1 (3.8) 6 (12) >0.050 Left ureter region 10 (13.1) 5 (19.2) 5 (10) 0.112 Right ureter region 4 (5.2) 2 (7.6) 2 (4) 0.370 Ureter resection 1 (1.3) 1 (2.0) 0 >0.050 Left inferior hypogastric plexus 4 (5.2) 2 (7.6) 2 (4) 0.370 Right inferior hypogastric plexus 1 (1.3) 1 (3.8) 0 >0.050 Ileostomy 1 (1.3) 0 1 (2) >0.050 30-day hospital readmission 8 (10.5) 3 (11.5) 5 (10) 0.892 Clavien-Dindo 1 and 2 18 (23.6) 7 (26.9) 11 (22) 0.686 Clavien-Dindo 3 and 4 6 (7.9) 2 (7.6) 4 (8) 0.898 Reoperation 2 (2.6) 0 2 (4) >0.050 Size and characteristics of intestinal endometriosis lesions In the 26 patients who underwent RTS, the median size of the largest diameter of intestinal lesions was 3.1 cm (range 1–5). Four (15.3%) patients had two different lesions in the same surgical specimen. In 9 (34.6%) patients, submucosal layer invasion was present. In the 5 (6.5%) patients submitted to disc excision, the median size of the largest diameter lesions was 2.6 cm (range 2.0–3.3). Thirty-one (40.7%) patients underwent rectal shaving, and the median size of the largest diameter lesions was 1.6 cm (range 0.5–4.0). Four (13.3%) patients received two shaving resections in different locations. Appendectomy was performed in 14 patients. Of those, 5 (35.7%) had no endometriosis lesions found. Larger lesions were more frequent in patients treated with RTS when compared to rectal shaving and disc excision, respectively (3.1 cm vs. 1.6 cm vs. 2.6 cm, p<0.001). The size of the lesion was not associated with increase in the incidence of surgical complications (coef 0.025; 95%CI -2.36 +2.41; p=0.983). The main characteristics of intestinal lesions are represented in Table 3. Table 3 Intestinal endometriosis lesions size.   RTS Rectal shaving Disc excision p-value n (%) 26 (34.2) 31 (40.7) 5 (6.5) Median Size (cm) (IQR) (range) 3.1 (2.0–3.3) 1–5 1.6 (1– 2.5) (0.5–4.0) 2.6 (2.5–3.1) (2–3.3) <0.001 Univariate regression (95%CI) p-value Multivariate regression (95%CI) p-value Major complications vs. Lesion size Coef 0.005 (-0.09 +0.10) 0.913 Coef 0.025 (-2.36 +2.41) 0.983 Data given in median (IQR: interquartile range) or n (%); CI: confidence interval; RTS: rectosigmoidectomy; Coef: coefficient. Bayesian regression and predictor inclusion map We performed Bayesian regression with linear regression with Stata built-in command to construct a visual map exploring the importance of predictors of RTS (Figure 1) or surgical complications (Figure 2). These models allow for visual screening by demonstrating positive and negative correlations in a logarithmic scale of relevant predictors to include in our regression model. The results revealed that diarrhea in the perimenstrual period was the strongest predictor for RTS, whereas no single predictor for major surgical complications could be identified. Figure 1 Visual map with Bayesian regression model demonstrating positive and negative correlations with rectosigmoidectomy. No strong single predictor for major surgical complications could be identified. Figure 2 Visual map with Bayesian regression model demonstrating positive and negative correlations with surgical complications. Diarrhea in the perimenstrual period was the strongest predictor for rectosigmoidectomy. Risk factors for rectosigmoidectomy and major complications The clinical features associated with higher likelihood of RTS included dyschezia (aRR 1.77; 95%CI 1.20–3.39; p=0.014; p<0.050), rectal bleeding (aRR 3.0; 95%CI 2.17–4.13; p=0.016; p<0.050), and diarrhea (odds ratio [OR] 1.99; 95%CI 1.03–3.82; p=0.038; p<0.050). There was no significant association between RTS and constipation (aRR 0.62; 95%CI 0.17–2.19; p=0.419; p>0.050) or duration of symptoms (coef 0.004; 95%CI -0.003 +0.022; p=0.719; p>0.050). The composite outcome of any intestinal symptom was not associated with a higher rate of RTS (aRR 1.29; 95%CI 0.68–2.45; p=0.432; p>0.050). Still, the no-colectomy surgery group was found to be an independent risk factor for reoperation (0.29; 95%CI 0.12–0.70; p<0.001). All data are presented in Table 4. Table 4 Risk factors for segmental resection and surgical complications. n (%) Number of events Segmental resection 26 (34.2) No-colectomy surgery 50 (65.7) Univariate risk ratio (95%CI) p-value Multivariate risk ratio (95%CI) p-value Surgical outcomes Major surgical complications (CD≥3) 6 1.92 (0.41–8.86) 0.395 1.95 (0.43–8.83) 0.385  Reoperation 2 - - 0.29 (0.12–0.70) <0.001  Concurrent hysterectomy 31 0.56 (0.28–1.12) 0.076 0.52 (0.07–3.47) 0.500 Predictors for segmental resection  Defecation pain 11 2.30 (0.77–6.85) 0.124 1.77 (1.20–3.39) 0.014  Rectal bleed 1 - - 3.00 (2.17–4.13) 0.016  Constipation 5 1.28 (0.23–7.19) 0.777 0.62 (0.17–2.19) 0.419  Any intestinal symptoms 22 1.33 (0.65–2.69) 0.432 1.29 (0.68–2.45) 0.432  Uterine bleed 13 1.20 (0.43–3.30) 0.722 1.11 (0.39–3.13) 0.843  Diarrhea 8 2.02 (1.06–3.05) 0.047 1.99 (1.03–3.82) 0.038 CI: confidence interval; CD: Clavien-Dindo classification. DISCUSSION This study reports the main outcomes of DE patients with intestinal involvement in a tertiary endometriosis referral center. We decided to divide the cohort of patients between the type of intestinal procedure performed (segmental resection group vs. no-colectomy surgery group). The most common overall gynecological symptom found was pelvic pain (68.4%), followed by dysmenorrhea (64.4%), and dyspareunia (48.6%). A study with more than 3,000 patients described an incidence of dysmenorrhea in 95% and dyspareunia in 87%, which can be considered similar to our findings15. Referring to intestinal symptoms, our data demonstrated that constipation was the most frequent (18.4%), followed by dyschezia (14.4%), and diarrhea (10.5%). Still, pelvic pain was more frequent in the no-colectomy surgery group and diarrhea was more common in the resection group. The correlation between the severity of symptoms and the disease stage is conflicting. Roman et al. compared three groups of patients related to the extension of the disease and their symptoms (patients with superficial endometriosis, patients with DE, and patients with DE and intestinal involvement). Women presenting with rectal endometriosis were more likely to report an increase in the intensity and length of dysmenorrhea, while deep dyspareunia appeared to be more severe in women with superficial endometriosis. Women reporting rectal endometriosis were more likely to present with cyclic defecation pain (67.9%), cyclic constipation (54.7%), and a significantly longer stool evacuation time. Still, these complaints were also frequent in the other two groups (38.1 and 33.3% in women with superficial endometriosis and 42.9 and 26.2% in women with DE without intestinal involvement, respectively). The authors did not find any independent clinical factors related to infiltration of the rectum by deep endometriosis, and therefore the type of resection23. Conversely, our results have shown that dyschezia, rectal bleeding, and above all diarrhea are strong predictive factors for performing RTS. Most patients with DE of the intestine will require surgery as a definitive treatment at some point. Quality of life (QOL) studies of patients operated on for DE have demonstrated an overall improvement in 85–95% of patients4. Several different approaches have been described to treat intestinal lesions depending on the characteristics of the lesions, such as size, percentage of intestinal circumference involvement, depth, and distance from the anal verge16. The three most performed surgical techniques are rectal shaving, disc excision, and segmental resection. Whenever possible, it is desirable to avoid segmental resections, especially in lesions close to the anal verge to avoid early complications, such as fistulas, or late complications such as anterior resection syndrome27. In our study, the final decision on optimal surgical technique was established intraoperatively. The overall median size of the largest diameter of intestinal lesions was 2.8 cm. There was a clear difference between the three groups (RTS: 3.1 cm vs. rectal shaving: 1.6 cm vs. disc excision: 2.6 cm; p<0.001), demonstrating that the size of the lesion had a direct impact on the decision of which type of resection was performed. However, this criterion is far from being accepted by other investigators. According to a review by Donnez et al., the size of the nodule should not dictate the type of surgery to be performed16. In a study with 63 patients published by Abdalla-Ribeiro et al., they found a cutoff point of 2.25 cm longitudinal lesion size separating the linear nodulectomy from the segmental resection for excising intestinal endometriosis1. Similar results were shown by Brey-Beraldo et al., demonstrating that the larger the lesion size, the greater the association with the use of wider intestinal resections (aRR 1.16; 95%CI 1.04–1.30; p=0.007)11. Despite that, as in the present study, no correlation was found between lesion size and surgical complications. Our results have confirmed that no-colectomy surgery offers shorter operative time and length of hospital stay. Obviously, in patients in whom segmental resection could be avoided, the disease was less advanced, and therefore, conservative surgery (less aggressive procedure) could be offered. Historically, surgical complication rates were relatively higher following segmental resection (RTS) than shaving or disc excision28. In a retrospective study with 364 patients (139 treated with RTS), Abo et al. compared the rate of postoperative complications in patients treated by RTS, discoid excision, and rectal shaving. Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications occurred in 11.8%, and the prevalence of these complications was significantly higher in the RTS group2. In another study with 143 patients, of whom 76 were treated with RTS, the rate of postoperative complications was 31.5%. Still, the RTS group had a higher rate of severe postoperative complications in comparison with the disc excision or shaving technique groups (23.5 vs. 5 vs. 0%, respectively)19. It would be expected that postoperative morbidity would be lower in the no-colectomy surgery group. However, our results have shown otherwise. The overall morbidity was 31.5%, but severe complications occurred only in 6 (7.8%) cases. Of these, two-thirds of the patients were in the no-colectomy surgery group. Nevertheless, the multivariate risk ratio regarding major complications between the two groups was not significant (1.95; 95%CI 0.43–8.83; p=0.385). Still, the two patients who required reoperation were in the no-colectomy group (new vaginal dome suturing). Curiously, the no-colectomy surgery group was found to be an independent risk factor for reoperation (0.29; 95%CI 0.12–0.70; p<0.001). In fact, this complication that required a reoperation was more related to the hysterectomy itself rather than any intestinal procedure performed. Rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic leakage are the two major complications of RTS. Other complications include pelvic abscess, postoperative bleeding, and ureteral damage. A meta-analysis of 3,079 patients published by Balla et al. observed an overall complication rate of 18.5%, and the most frequent complication that occurred was recto-vaginal fistula (2.4%)5. Ruffo et al. reported an incidence of ureteral damage between 0.5–3.7% of patients treated with RTS24. Although the risk of ureter damage is real, the identification and thorough dissection of both ureters must be carried out to ensure the absence of infiltration by an endometriosis nodule. Extrinsic involvement is treated with “decompression” preferably protected by a double-J stent. Intrinsic ureteral involvement is treated by resection followed by primary anastomosis or ureteral bladder, depending on the distance to the bladder. In our study, extrinsic involvement of the ureter was present in almost 20% of patients, and only one patient required resection. Although the left ureter was more affected than the right, no significant difference was found in ureter involvement. One of the major risk factors for the occurrence of fistula is the concomitant presence of a suture line from a segmental resection and the excision of vaginal nodules from the vaginal dome after hysterectomy. In our study, there was no anastomotic leakage. One (1.3%) patient developed a rectovaginal fistula on the 9th postoperative day, and another one (1.3%) developed a ureterovaginal fistula on the 10th postoperative day. Both were treated with RTS and concurrent hysterectomy. Even though hysterectomy was not found as an independent risk factor for major complications (0.52; 95%CI 0.07–3.47; p=0.500), one should be alert whenever an associated procedure for the reproductive and urinary organs is necessary. A systematic review reported that about 80% of patients treated with RTS for intestinal endometriosis underwent more than one procedure in the same intervention5. For instance, ileocolic locations should be searched carefully intraoperatively because preoperative imaging fails to identify these lesions in over 50% of cases. These may be treated with appendectomy, cecal, ileal or ileocecal resection, depending on the location. In the present study, appendectomy was necessary in 18.5% of patients and enterectomy in 6.5%. Although no significant difference was found, probably due to the low number of patients, the no-colectomy surgery group was responsible for almost 80% of these cases. Bendifallah et al. demonstrated that the occurrence of rectovaginal fistula and anastomotic leakage in centers performing more than 40 procedures per year was 2.8%, compared to 4.9% in centers performing less than ten procedures8. This volume-outcome relationship was also identified in other studies for different diseases, whereupon surgical morbidity and mortality have declined considerably due to centralization of patients in high-volume hospitals6. Our rate of 6.5% of surgical morbidity and no mortality correspond to outcomes of other high-volume DE centers5,7. Better outcomes tend to be obtained from the first operation when compared to subsequent surgical procedures. Therefore, an excessive number of procedures should be avoided27. Vercellini et al. reported that the frequency of Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications observed in patients undergoing repeated surgery was more than double (14%) of that observed in patients undergoing first-line surgery (6%)27. Our data shows that 20% of the patients already had previous surgical treatment, but no increase in the risk of severe complications was found in this group of patients. Some authors claimed that the risk of rectovaginal fistula or leakage after bowel resection can be reduced when a protective ileostomy at the time of surgery is performed, especially with low anastomosis (<5 cm from the anal verge)13,26. In contrast, it has been reported that bowel stenosis occurs in patients who undergo segmental resection, most of them with a diverting stoma, with no cases reported in patients undergoing disc excision, with or without a stoma10. The rate of diverting stoma after bowel resection for rectovaginal DE is widely variable, from 1.6 to 96%17. In our results, the need of ileostomy was necessary in one (1.3%) case, as a result of failure of the stapling device in a patient undergoing disc excision. Despite the prospective data collection, our work has the limitations of a retrospective study. For instance, the number of patients enrolled is relatively small and the long-term outcomes such as improvement in quality of life, late complications, and recurrence were not evaluated, and must be the object of future investigations. CONCLUSION Patients with deep endometriosis with intestinal involvement, symptoms like dyschezia, rectal bleeding, and diarrhea during the menstrual period are predictive factors for performing a rectosigmoidectomy. Still, regarding severe complications, no difference was found between patients who underwent segmental resection and those in the no-colectomy surgery group. Surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis has low morbidity when performed in specialized centers. REFERENCES 1. 1. Abdalla-Ribeiro H, Maekawa MM, Lima RF, Nicola ALA, Rodrigues FCM, Ribeiro PA. Intestinal endometriotic nodules with a length greater than 2.25 cm and affecting more than 27% of the circumference are more likely to undergo segmental resection, rather than linear nodulectomy. PLoS One. 2021;16(4):e0247654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247654 Abdalla-Ribeiro H Maekawa MM Lima RF Nicola ALA Rodrigues FCM Ribeiro PA Intestinal endometriotic nodules with a length greater than 2.25 cm and affecting more than 27% of the circumference are more likely to undergo segmental resection, rather than linear nodulectomy. PLoS One. 2021 16 4 e0247654 10.1371/journal.pone.0247654 2. 2. Abo C, Moatassim S, Marty N, Ghislain MS, Huet E, Bridoux V, et al. Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(1):172-8.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001 Abo C Moatassim S Marty N Ghislain MS Huet E Bridoux V Postoperative complications after bowel endometriosis surgery by shaving, disc excision, or segmental resection: a three-arm comparative analysis of 364 consecutive cases. Fertil Steril. 2018 109 1 172 8.e1 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.001 3. 3. Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):329-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv003 Abrão MS Petraglia F Falcone T Keckstein J Osuga Y Chapron C Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update. 2015 21 3 329 39 10.1093/humupd/dmv003 4. 4. Araújo RSC, Ribeiro HSAA, Sekula VG, Porto BTC, Ribeiro PAAG. Long-term outcomes on quality of life in women submitted to laparoscopic treatment for bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):682-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.005 Araújo RSC Ribeiro HSAA Sekula VG Porto BTC Ribeiro PAAG Long-term outcomes on quality of life in women submitted to laparoscopic treatment for bowel endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 21 4 682 8 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.005 5. 5. Balla A, Quaresima S, Subiela JD, Shalaby M, Petrella G, Sileri P. Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(7):835-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y Balla A Quaresima S Subiela JD Shalaby M Petrella G Sileri P Outcomes after rectosigmoid resection for endometriosis: a systematic literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 33 7 835 47 10.1007/s00384-018-3082-y 6. 6. Barchi LC, Ramos MFKP, Dias AR, Forones NM, Carvalho MP, Castro OAP, et al. Brazilian gastric cancer association guidelines (part 2): update on treatment. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021;34(1):e1563. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020210001e1563 Barchi LC Ramos MFKP Dias AR Forones NM Carvalho MP Castro OAP Brazilian gastric cancer association guidelines (part 2): update on treatment. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 34 1 e1563 10.1590/0102-672020210001e1563 7. 7. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, Moawad G, Daraï E, Roman H. Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):453-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015 Bendifallah S Puchar A Vesale E Moawad G Daraï E Roman H Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 28 3 453 66 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.015 8. 8. Bendifallah S, Roman H, Rubod C, Leguevaque P, Watrelot A, Bourdel N, et al. Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(4):2003-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5896-z Bendifallah S Roman H Rubod C Leguevaque P Watrelot A Bourdel N Impact of hospital and surgeon case volume on morbidity in colorectal endometriosis management: a plea to define criteria for expert centers. Surg Endosc. 2018 32 4 2003 11 10.1007/s00464-017-5896-z 9. 9. Bendifallah S, Roman H, d’Argent EM, Touleimat S, Cohen J, Darai E, et al. Colorectal endometriosis-associated infertility: should surgery precede ART? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):525-31.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.002 Bendifallah S Roman H d’Argent EM Touleimat S Cohen J Darai E Colorectal endometriosis-associated infertility: should surgery precede ART? Fertil Steril. 2017 108 3 525 31.e4 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.002 10. 10. Braund S, Hennetier C, Klapczynski C, Scattarelli A, Coget J, Bridoux V, et al. Risk of postoperative stenosis after segmental resection versus disk excision for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid: a retrospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(1):50-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034 Braund S Hennetier C Klapczynski C Scattarelli A Coget J Bridoux V Risk of postoperative stenosis after segmental resection versus disk excision for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectosigmoid: a retrospective study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 28 1 50 6 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.034 11. 11. Bray-Beraldo F, Pereira AMG, Gazzo C, Santos MP, Lopes RGC. Surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis: outcomes of three different techniques. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018;40(7):390-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660827 Bray-Beraldo F Pereira AMG Gazzo C Santos MP Lopes RGC Surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis: outcomes of three different techniques. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018 40 7 390 6 10.1055/s-0038-1660827 12. 12. Chapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B, Foulot H, Dousset B, Vacher-Lavenu MC, et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(7):1839-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/del079 Chapron C Chopin N Borghese B Foulot H Dousset B Vacher-Lavenu MC Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum Reprod. 2006 21 7 1839 45 10.1093/humrep/del079 13. 13. Chapron C, Jacob S, Dubuisson JB, Vieira M, Liaras E, Fauconnier A. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(4):349-54. PMID: 11264611. Chapron C Jacob S Dubuisson JB Vieira M Liaras E Fauconnier A Laparoscopically assisted vaginal management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectovaginal septum. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 80 4 349 54 11264611 14. 14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 Clavien PA Barkun J Oliveira ML Vauthey JN Dindo D Schulick RD The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 250 2 187 96 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2 15. 15. Donnez J, Jadoul P, Colette S, Luyckx M, Squifflet J, Donnez O. Deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules: perioperative complications from a series of 3,298 patients operated on by the shaving technique. Gynecol Surg. 2013;10:31-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-012-0759-z Donnez J Jadoul P Colette S Luyckx M Squifflet J Donnez O Deep rectovaginal endometriotic nodules: perioperative complications from a series of 3,298 patients operated on by the shaving technique. Gynecol Surg. 2013 10 31 40 10.1007/s10397-012-0759-z 16. 16. Donnez O, Roman H. Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):931-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006 Donnez O Roman H Choosing the right surgical technique for deep endometriosis: shaving, disc excision, or bowel resection? Fertil Steril. 2017 108 6 931 42 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.006 17. 17. Dousset B, Leconte M, Borghese B, Millischer AE, Roseau G, Arkwright S, et al. Complete surgery for low rectal endometriosis: long-term results of a 100-case prospective study. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):887-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9722d Dousset B Leconte M Borghese B Millischer AE Roseau G Arkwright S Complete surgery for low rectal endometriosis: long-term results of a 100-case prospective study. Ann Surg. 2010 251 5 887 95 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d9722d 18. 18. oFrugis MO, Ribas CAPM, Malafaia O, Tabushi FI, Czeczko NG. Macroscopic and histological analysis on endoscopically resected rectal lesions. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023;36:e1733. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020230015e1733 oFrugis MO Ribas CAPM Malafaia O Tabushi FI Czeczko NG Macroscopic and histological analysis on endoscopically resected rectal lesions. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 36 e1733 10.1590/0102-672020230015e1733 19. 19. Hernández Gutiérrez A, Spagnolo E, Zapardiel I, Garcia-Abadillo Seivane R, López Carrasco A, Salas Bolívar P, et al. Post-operative complications and recurrence rate after treatment of bowel endometriosis: comparison of three techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;4:100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100083 Hernández Gutiérrez A Spagnolo E Zapardiel I Garcia-Abadillo Seivane R López Carrasco A Salas Bolívar P Post-operative complications and recurrence rate after treatment of bowel endometriosis: comparison of three techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 4 100083 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100083 20. 20. Horne AW, Missmer SA. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ. 2022;379:e070750. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070750 Horne AW Missmer SA Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis. BMJ. 2022 379 e070750 10.1136/bmj-2022-070750 21. 21. Irlbeck T, Zwißler B, Bauer A. ASA classification: transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature. Anaesthesist. 2017;66(1):5-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-016-0246-4 Irlbeck T Zwißler B Bauer A ASA classification: transition in the course of time and depiction in the literature. Anaesthesist. 2017 66 1 5 10 10.1007/s00101-016-0246-4 22. 22. Maggiore ULR, Chiappa V, Ceccaroni M, Roviglione G, Savelli L, Ferrero S, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in women with endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;92:102454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102454 Maggiore ULR Chiappa V Ceccaroni M Roviglione G Savelli L Ferrero S Epidemiology of infertility in women with endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 92 102454 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102454 23. 23. Roman H, Ness J, Suciu N, Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Leroi AM, et al. Are digestive symptoms in women presenting with pelvic endometriosis specific to lesion localizations? A preliminary prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3440-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des322 Roman H Ness J Suciu N Bridoux V Gourcerol G Leroi AM Are digestive symptoms in women presenting with pelvic endometriosis specific to lesion localizations? A preliminary prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2012 27 12 3440 9 10.1093/humrep/des322 24. 24. Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L. Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(1):63-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0517-0 Ruffo G Scopelliti F Scioscia M Ceccaroni M Mainardi P Minelli L Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc. 2010 24 1 63 7 10.1007/s00464-009-0517-0 25. 25. Shiomi A, Ito M, Maeda K, Kinugasa Y, Ota M, Yamaue H, et al. Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(2):186-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.017 Shiomi A Ito M Maeda K Kinugasa Y Ota M Yamaue H Effects of a diverting stoma on symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of 1,014 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 220 2 186 94 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.017 26. 26. Sobrado LF, Mori FNC, Facanali CBG, Camargo MGM, Nahas SC, Sobrado CW. Risk factors for early postoperative complications in acute colitis in the era of biologic therapy. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023;36:e1770. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-672020230052e1770 Sobrado LF Mori FNC Facanali CBG Camargo MGM Nahas SC Sobrado CW Risk factors for early postoperative complications in acute colitis in the era of biologic therapy. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2023 36 e1770 10.1590/0102-672020230052e1770 27. 27. Vercellini P, Sergenti G, Somigliana E. Surgery for rectal endometriosis: the technique or the indication, that is the question. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(6):1169-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.007 Vercellini P Sergenti G Somigliana E Surgery for rectal endometriosis: the technique or the indication, that is the question. Fertil Steril. 2020 113 6 1169 70 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.007 28. 28. Wills HJ, Reid GD, Cooper MJ, Morgan M. Fertility and pain outcomes following laparoscopic segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;48(3):292-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00871.x Wills HJ Reid GD Cooper MJ Morgan M Fertility and pain outcomes following laparoscopic segmental bowel resection for colorectal endometriosis: a review. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 48 3 292 5 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00871.x 29. 29. Yong PJ, Bedaiwy MA, Alotaibi F, Anglesio MS. Pathogenesis of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;71:2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.009 Yong PJ Bedaiwy MA Alotaibi F Anglesio MS Pathogenesis of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 71 2 13 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.009 Financial Source: None Perspectives For patients with deep endometriosis and intestinal involvement, symptoms like dyschezia, rectal bleeding, and diarrhea during this period are predictive factors for performing rectosigmoidectomy. Still, regarding severe complications, no difference was found between patients who underwent segmental resection and those in the no-colectomy surgery group. Surgical treatment of intestinal endometriosis has a low morbidity when performed in specialized centers. Figure 1. Visual map with Bayesian regression model demonstrating positive and negative correlations with rectosigmoidectomy. No strong single predictor for major surgical complications could be identified. Central Message Patients with intestinal endometriosis present with symptoms including diarrhea, constipation, tenesmus, dyschezia, and rectal bleeding. Symptoms are usually synchronous with menstruation, but they can occur apart from the menstrual period. Surgical treatment is usually required for those patients. It is currently considered the first option in symptomatic patients with invasive intestinal compromise, as it leads to lasting relief of symptoms and improvement in quality of life.