Anwar, Behrose e Ahmed (2018ANWAR, T. B; BEHROSE, B.; AHMED, S. Utilization of textile sludge and public health risk assessment in Bangladesh. Sustainable Environment Research, v. 28, n. 5, p. 228-233, 2018.) |
0,50% |
Resistência à compressão - 29,0 MPa Absorção de água - 0,8% Perda de volume - 11,0% Obs.: Não teve amostra de referência |
Beshah, Tiruye e Mekonnen (2021BESHAH, D. A.; TIRUYE, G. A.; MEKONNEN, Y. S. Characterization and recycling of textile sludge for energy-efficient brick production in Ethiopia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 28, p. 16272-16281, 2021.) |
10% (1200°C) |
Resistência à compressão - 30,4 MPa (↓6,4%) Absorção de água - 17,0% (↑12,0%) Perda de massa - 25,0% (↑67,0%) |
Chauhan e Chopra (2017CHAUHAN, A. S.; CHOPRA, A. Incorporation of textile mill sludge and fly ash in burnt clay brick manufacturing. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, v. 8, n. 7, p. 97-104, 2017. ) |
3% |
Resistência à compressão - 6,0 MPa (↓33,0%) Absorção de água - 16,0% (Não teve amostra de referência) |
Chen e Wu (2018CHEN, C.; WU, H. Lightweight bricks manufactured from ground soil, textile sludge, and coal ash. Environmental Technology, v. 39, n. 11, p. 1359-1367, 2018.) |
5% |
Resistência à compressão - 27,5% (↓3,5%) |
Delaqua et al. (2022DELAQUA, G. C. G. et al.Incorporation of sludge from effluent treatment plant of an industrial laundry into heavy clay ceramics. Journal of Building Engineering, v. 47, 2022.) |
2,50% |
Resistência à flexão - 9,2 MPa (↓9,8%); Absorção de água - 21,0% (↑2,4%) |
Herek et al. (2012HEREK, L. C. S. et al.Characterization of ceramic bricks incorporated with textile laundry sludge. Ceramics International, v. 38, n. 2, p. 951-959, 2012.) |
5% |
Resistência à flexão - 35,9 MPa (↓0,5%) Absorção de água - 15,0% (↑50,0%) |
Hossain et al. (2018HOSSAIN, M. S. et al. Reuse of textile mill ETP sludge in environmental friendly bricks: effect of gamma radiation. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, v. 151, p. 77-83, 2018.) |
25% |
Resistência à flexão - 1,7 MPa (↑16,7%) Perda de massa - 5,5% (↑60,1%) |
Priyadharshini et al. (2018PRIYADHARSHINI, B. et al. Utilization of textile sludge in manufacturing e-bricks. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology , v. 9, n. 11, p. 2266-2273 , 2018. ) |
5% |
Resistência à compressão - 4,5 MPa (↓16,0%) Absorção de água - 12,6% (↑14,7%) |
Rahman et al. (2015RAHMAN, A. et al. Effects of waste glass additions on quality of textile sludge-based bricks. Environmental Technology , v. 36, n. 19, p. 2443 -2450, 2015.) |
30% (c/ 10% de resíduo de vidro - garrafas) |
Resistência à compressão - 74,0 MPa (↑155,2%) Absorção de água - 5,0% (↓28,6%) |
Saha et al. (2022SAHA, G. C. et al. Sustainable utilization of textile dyeing sludge and coal fly ash by brick production through traditional kilns. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, v. 21, n. 3, p. 971-980, 2022.) |
5% (+5% de FA) |
Resistência à compressão - 6,2 MPa (↓6,1%) Absorção de água - (18,8% - Não teve alteração) |
Shathika et al. (2013SHATHIKA, B. et al. Utilization of textile effluent wastewater treatment plant sludge as brick material. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management , v. 15, n. 4, p. 564-570, 2013.) |
3% |
Resistência à compressão - 5,6 MPa (↓29,8%) Absorção de água - 12,0% (↑9,1%) Perda de massa - 2,2% (↑29,4%) |
Ullah et al. (2020ULLAH, S. M. H. et al. Performance of industrial sludge-amended bricks manufactured in conventional kilns. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management , v. 22, n. 6, p. 1932-1942, 2020.) |
10% |
Resistência à compressão - 24,5 MPa (↓4,3%) Absorção de água - 12,8 % (↑12,0%) Perda de massa - 13,3% (↑23,0%) |