Resumo
The aim of this paper is the study of moon effects on ten different crops divided in four groups: 1) salad and cole crops (lettuce, endive, cabbage, cauliflower); 2) root crops (beet, carrot, radish, turnip); 3) bulb crops (onion); 4) solanaceous fruits (eggplant). The design of the experiment was randomized blocks, with four replications, the different treatments being the four phases of the moon. The analyses of variance are given in the work of Simão (1953) and the analises of the mean in tables 1 to 2. The main conclusions are: 1) No difference in production were found related to different moon phases, even it the crops supposed to be sensible to moon effects. 2) In a few cases, where some increase in production was observed, such increase could be atributed by other apents 3) The agents supposed to interfere with increase in production were temperature and photoperiodism, rather than moon phases. 4) The most sensible crops to low temperature, during the night, were: lettuce, endive, cauliflower, cabbage, carrots, turnips and radish. 5) The most sensible crops to both low temperature and photoperiodism were: onion and beet. 6) The moon phases supposed to have opposed effects, namely full-moon and half-moon, gave mixed results sometimes both giving the best yield simultaneously and sometimes giving the poorest crops. 7) As a final conclusion, no moon effects could be detectable in the present experiment.
Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" Universidade de S. Paulo - Piracicaba
SUMMARY
The aim of this paper is the study of moon effects on ten different crops divided in four groups: 1) salad and cole crops (lettuce, endive, cabbage, cauliflower); 2) root crops (beet, carrot, radish, turnip); 3) bulb crops (onion); 4) solanaceous fruits (eggplant).
The design of the experiment was randomized blocks, with four replications, the different treatments being the four phases of the moon.
The analyses of variance are given in the work of Simão (1953) and the analises of the mean in tables 1 to 2.
The main conclusions are:
1) No difference in production were found related to different moon phases, even it the crops supposed to be sensible to moon effects.
2) In a few cases, where some increase in production was observed, such increase could be atributed by other apents
3) The agents supposed to interfere with increase in production were temperature and photoperiodism, rather than moon phases.
4) The most sensible crops to low temperature, during the night, were: lettuce, endive, cauliflower, cabbage, carrots, turnips and radish.
5) The most sensible crops to both low temperature and photoperiodism were: onion and beet.
6) The moon phases supposed to have opposed effects, namely full-moon and half-moon, gave mixed results sometimes both giving the best yield simultaneously and sometimes giving the poorest crops.
7) As a final conclusion, no moon effects could be detectable in the present experiment.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text available only in PDF format.
BIBLIOGRAFIA CITADA
Referências bibliográficas
- ANDRADE, E. N., 1926 - Os eucaliptos - Secretaria da Agricultura do Est. de S. Paulo, 228 pp.
- ANGOT, A., 1928 - Traité Elementaire de Meteorologie. Livraria Gauthier Willars, Paris, 420 pp.
- AZZI, G., 1938 - O Meio Physico e a Produção Agraria - Oficinas Gráficas S. A., Rio, 526 pp.
- BEESON, C. F. C, 1946 - Foresty Abstracts. Published by the Imperial Forestry Bureau, Oxford 8: 2 - 191-196.
- BELL, G. D. & A. B. BAUER, 1942 - Growing sugar beet under Continuous ilumination. The Journal of Agricultural Science 32: 112-141.
- BLAIER, T. A., 1946 - Weathers Elements. Prentice, New York, 401 pp.
- BRIEGER, F. G., 1937 - Tabuas e formulas para estatística. Companhia Melhoramentos de S. Paulo, 46 pp.
- CARNEIRO, P. T. A., 1948 - Vernalização de plantas horticolas. Ceres 7: 297-300.
- CLEMENTE, F. E. & J. E. WEAVER, 1950 - Ecologia vegetal. Ed. Acme Agency, Buenos Aires, 667 pp.
- CROCKER, W. & L. V. BARTON, 1953 - Physiology of Seeds. Walthans, Mass, 267 pp.
- DAVIS, W. M., 1902 - Elementary Meteorology. Gim & Co. Borton, 355 pp.
- GARNER, W. W. & H. A. HALLARD, 1920 - Effect of the Relative Lenght of day and night in Plant. Journal of Agricultural Research, 38: 553-606.
- GRANATO, L., 1929 - Manual do Agricultor. Ed. Ltda., São Paulo, 276 pp.
- HEATH, O. V. S., 1949 - Role of Starch in light. Nature 159: 647-648.
- HERSCHEL, F. W. J., 1901 - Outlines of Astronomy. Colher and Son, New York, 920 pp.
- HONDAILIE, F., 1893 - Le Soleil et L'agriculture. Gauthier -Villares, Paris, 542 pp.
- MAC KINNEY, H. H. & W. J. SANDO, 1935 - Earliness of Sexual reprodution in wheat a influenced by temperature and night in relation to grow phases. Journal of Agricultural Research. 51: 621-641.
- KNOTT, J. E., 1950 - Palestras sobre horticultura. Edição da Reitoria da Universidade de S. Paulo, 213 pp.
- KOLISKO, L., 1936 - The moon and the growth of plants. Antroposophical Agricultural Foudation.
- LEWIS, H. & F. W. WENT, 1945 - Plant Growth under controlled conditions. American Journal of Botany 32: 1-12.
- LIEMPT, J. A. M., 1948 - Brightness of the New Moon. Nature 161: 27.
- MACHT, D. I., 1927 - Concerning the influence of polanized light on the seedling. Journal of General Physiology 20: 41-52.
- MARTIN, C. E., 1913 - Our own weather. Harper and Brothers 277 pp.
- MATHER, M., 1942 - The effect of temperature and the moon on seedling growth. J. Roy Hort. Soc. 67: 264-270.
- MAXIMOV, A. N., 1946 - Fisiologia vegetal. Version Hespanhola, Acme, Buenos Aires, 433 pp.
- MOTTA, J. I. S., 1950 - Influências das fases da lua sôbre as plantas cultivadas. Agros (Pelota) 3: 201-223.
- NAYLOR, A. W. & G. GERNES, 1940 - Fluorescente lamps as a source of night for growing plant. Botanical Gazette 101: 715-716.
- PAPADASKI, J. S., 1938 - Ecologie Agricole. Liv. Agricole, Paris. 312 pp.
- PEREIRA, J. A., 1949 - A influência lunar na ação dos insetos. Anuário Brasileiro de Economia Florestal 2: 490-501.
- PUIG, I, 1942 - Influências lunares. Ed. Sopena, Buenos Aires 198 pp.
- RAZO, J., 1948 - La luna Y Ias luvias. Revista Meteorlogica 7: 26.
- SANTOS, P. O., 1951 - Terá a lua influência na vida vegetal - Agros. 6: 261-275.
- SEMMENS, E. S., 1924 - Polarized light and starch content of plants. Nature 114: 719.
- SIMÃO, S., 1953 (a) - A lua e a sua influência, sôbre a Agricultura - Revista da Sociedade Rural Brasileira. 338: 22-23.
- SIMÂO, S., 1953 - Contribuição ao Estudo da Suposta Ação Lunar Sôbre Plantas Hortícolas. Tese de Doutoramento, pp. 48. Piracicaba.
- TELES, Q. A., 1922 - Apontamentos de Silvicultura - Secretaria da Agricultura. São Paulo. 124 pp.
- VERCIER, J., 1914 - Culture Patagére. Ed Librarie Hachette, Paris. 107 pp.
- VIGER, A., 1925 - L'Atmosphere. Librarie Hachette, Paris. 196 pp.
- WINT, F. W., 1945 - Plantas Growth under controlled conditions. American Journal of Botany 32: 469-479.
- WRIGHT, F. E., 1927 - Polarization of light refleted fron rough surface with special reference at light refleted by the moon. Geophysical Laboratory 13: 535.
Datas de Publicação
-
Publicação nesta coleção
25 Set 2012 -
Data do Fascículo
1958