Bayesian belief network (BBN) |
Assessing SE provided by riparian zones |
McVittie et al. (2015)McVittie, A., Norton, L., Martin-Ortega, J., Siameti, I., Glenk, K., & Aalders, I., 2015. Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: an application to riparian buffer strips. Ecol. Econ. 110, 15-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.12.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.201...
|
FyrisSKZ, working for water (WFW) |
Assessing water quality |
Turpie et al. (2008)Turpie, J.K., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J.N., 2008. The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecol. Econ. 65(4), 788-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.200...
, Collentine et al. (2015)Collentine, D., Johnsson, H., Larsson, P., Markensten, H., & Persson, K., 2015. Designing cost efficient buffer zone programs: an application of the FyrisSKZ tool in a Swedish catchment. Ambio 44(Suppl. 2), S311- S 318. PMid:25681987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0627-y. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-062...
|
Integrated valuation of ES and tradeoffs (InVEST) |
Assessing the consequences of reducing riparian zones and ES pollination |
Meehan et al. (2013)Meehan, T.D., Gratton, C., Diehl, E., Hunt, N.D., Mooney, D.F., Ventura, S.J., Barham, B.L., & Jackson, R.D., 2013. Ecosystem service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in riparian zones of the US Midwest. PLoS One 8(11), e80093. PMid:24223215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0...
, Garrastazú et al. (2015)Garrastazú, M.C., Mendonça, S.D., Horokoski, T.T., Cardoso, D.J., Rosot, M.A.D., Nimmo, E.R., & Lacerda, A.E.B., 2015. Carbon sequestration and riparian zones: assessing the impacts of changing regulatory practices in Southern Brazil. Land Use Policy 42, 329-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2...
|
Soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) |
Assessing sediment and water dynamics |
Amatya et al. (2011)Amatya, D.M., Douglas-Mankin, K.R., Williams, T.M., Skaggs, R.W., & Nettles, J.E., 2011. Advances in forest hydrology: challenges and opportunities. ASABE 54(6), 2049-2056. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.40672. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.40672...
, Palazón et al. (2014)Palazón, L., Gaspar, L., Latorre, B., Blake, W.H., & Navas, A., 2014. Evaluating the importance of surface soil contributions to reservoir sediment in alpine environments: a combined modelling and fingerprinting approach in the Posets-Maladeta Natural Park. Solid Earth 5(2), 963-978. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/se-5-963-2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/se-5-963-2014...
, Vigiak et al. (2016)Vigiak, O., Malagó, A., Bouraoui, F., Grizzetti, B., Weissteiner, C.J., & Pastori, M., 2016. Impact of current riparian land on sediment retention in the Danube River Basin. Sustain. Water Qual. Ecol. 8, 30-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swaqe.2016.08.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.swaqe.2016.0...
|
STELLA |
Assessing interactions between water bodies and land use |
Randhir & Ekness (2013)Randhir, T.O., & Ekness, P., 2013. Water quality change and habitat potential in riparian ecosystems. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 13(3), 192-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013.09.001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2013....
|
CAESAR LISFLOOD (C-L) |
Simulating the effect of in-channel obstructions on the distribution of erosion and deposition sediments |
Walsh et al. (2020)Walsh, P., Jakeman, A., & Thompson, C., 2020. Modelling headwater channel response and suspended sediment yield to in-channel large wood using the Caesar-Lisflood landscape evolution model. Geomorphology 363, 107209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.202...
|
Riparian ecosystem management model (REMM) |
Simulating ecological processes in riparian zones |
Altier et al. (2002)Altier, L.S., Lowrance, R., Williams, R.G., Inamdar, S.P., Bosh, D.D., Sheridan, J.M., Hubbard, R.K., & Thomas, D.L., 2002. Riparian ecosystem management model: simulator for ecological processes in riparian zones. USA: United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Conservation Research Report, 46., Kim et al. (2007)Kim, I.J., Hutchinson, S.L., Hutchinson, J.M.S., & Young, C.B., 2007. Riparian ecosystem management model: sensitivity to soil, vegetation, and weather input parameters. JAWRA, 45(5), 1171-1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00096.x. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007...
|
Copernicus land monitoring service (CLMS) |
Assessing and monitoring green infrastructure in riparian zones |
Piedelobo et al. (2019)Piedelobo, L., Taramelli, A., Schiavon, E. & Valentini, E., 2019. Assessment of green infrastructure in riparian zones using copernicus programme. Remote Sens. 11(24), 2967. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242967. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242967...
|
Land utilization capability indicator (LUCI) |
Integrating land management decision support model applied to map areas providing ecosystem goods and services |
Sharps et al. (2017)Sharps, K., Masante, D., Thomas, A., Jackson, B., Redhead, J., May, L., Prosser, H., Cosby, B., Emmett, B., & Jones, L., 2017. Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modeling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 584-585, 118-130. PMid:28147292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.20...
|
Biotic integrity, Jaccard and Shanon-Weaver diversity indexes |
Assessing the diversity and distribution of species and individuals in the riparian zones related to ES |
Huh & Choi (2019)Huh, M.K., & Choi, B.K., 2019. Floristic characterization and biodiversity of riparian zones at the Gwangyang river, Korea. Eur. J. Appl. Sci., 6(2), 24-38., Burdon et al. (2020)Burdon, F.J., Ramberg, E., Sargac, J., Forio, M.A.E., de Saeyer, N., Mutinova, P.T., Moe, T.F., Pavelescu, M.O., Dinu, V., Cazacu, C., Witing, F., Kupilas, B., Grandin, U., Volk, M., Rîşnoveanu, G., Goethals, P., Friberg, N., Johnson, R.K., & McKie, B.G., 2020. Assessing the benefits of forested riparian zones: a qualitative index of riparian integrity is positively associated with ecological status in European streams. Water 12(4), 1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12041178. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w12041178...
|
Riparian quality index (RQI), Stream visual assessment protocol (SVAP) |
Assessing the quality of riparian zones |
Bjorkland et al. (2001)Bjorkland, R., Pringle, C.M., & Newton, B., 2001. A stream visual assessment protocol (SVAP) for riparian landowners. Environ. Monit. Assess. 68(2), 99-125. PMid:11411146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010743124570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:101074312457...
, Del Tánago & Jalón (2006)Del Tánago, M.G., & Jalón, D.G., 2006. Índice RQI para la valoración de las riberas fluviales en el contexto de la directiva marco del agua. Ing. Civ., 143, 97-108., Warren II et al. (2015)Warren II, R.J., Potts, D.L., & Frothingham, K.M., 2015. Stream structural limitations on invasive communities in urban riparian areas. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 8(3), 353-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-14-00081.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-14-0008...
|
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) |
Assessing and mapping green infrastructure in riparian zones by remote sensing |
Yang (2007)Yang, X., 2007. Integrated use of remote sensing and geographic information systems in riparian vegetation delineation and mapping. Remote Sens. 28(2), 353-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600726763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160600726...
, Fu et al. (2016)Fu, B., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, B., Yin, S., Zhu, H., & Xing, Z., 2016. Evaluation of ecosystem service value of riparian zone using land use data from 1986 to 2012. Ecol. Indic. 69, 873-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.0...
|
Normalized difference water index (NDWI) |
Assessing and mapping changes in water content in riparian zones by remote sensing |
Pereira et al. (2018)Pereira, L.E., Amorim, G., Grigio, A.M., & Paranhos Filho, A.C., 2018. Análise comparativa entre métodos de índice de água por diferença normalizada (NDWI) em área úmida continental. Anu. Inst. Geocienc. 41(2), 654-662. https://doi.org/10.11137/2018_2_654_662. https://doi.org/10.11137/2018_2_654_662...
, Vanderhoof & Burt (2018)Vanderhoof, M. & Burt, C., 2018. Applying high resolution imagery to evaluate restoration induced changes in stream condition, Missouri River Headwaters Basin, Montana. Remote Sens. 10(6), 913. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060913. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060913...
|
Relative aggregated value of ecosystem services indexes (RAVES) |
Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services |
Comín et al. (2018)Comín, F.A., Beatriz, M., Ricardo, S., Felipe-Lucia, M.R., Jiménez, J.J., & Enrique, N., 2018. Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol., 55(3), 1155-1163. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8t5d4. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.8t5d4...
|
Generalized additive models (GAM) |
Describing the spatial pattern of pollination benefits using predictors |
Lautenbach et al. (2011)Lautenbach, S., Kugel, C., Lausch, A., & Seppelt, R., 2011. Analysis of historic changes in regional ecosystem service provisioning using land use data. Ecol. Indic. 11(2), 676-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.09.007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2010...
|
Relative pollination potential index (RPP) |
Evaluating the benefits of pollination for crop yield |
Zulian et al. (2013)Zulian, G., Maes, J., & Paracchini, M.L., 2013. Linking land cover data and crop yields for mapping and assessment of pollination services in Europe. Land (Basel) 2(3), 472-492. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land2030472. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/land2030472...
|
A new comprehensive ecosystem service index (CES) |
Analyzing spatiotemporal changes and trade-offs to support the supply of multiple ecosystem services |
Sun et al. (2018)Sun, X., Lu, Z., Li, F. & Crittenden, J.C., 2018. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA. Sci. Total Environ., 622-623, 974-987.
|
Water retention index |
Planning land use to manage water resources |
Vandecasteele et al. (2018)Vandecasteele, I., Marí i Rivero, I., Baranzelli, C., Becker, W., Dreoni, I., Lavalle, C., & Batelaan, O., 2018. The Water Retention Index: using land use planning to manage water resources in Europe. Sustain. Dev. (Bradford) 26(2), 122-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.1723...
|
Ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA) |
Developing environmental flow prescriptions for many streams and rivers in a user-defined geographic region or jurisdiction |
Mackay et al. (2014)Mackay, S., Arthington, A.H., & James, C.S., 2014. Classification and comparison of natural and altered flow regimes to support an Australian trial of the Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration framework. Ecohydrology 7(6), 1485-1507. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1473...
|