Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Politics, Parliament, and the Penalty of the Lash: The Significance of the End of Flogging in 18861 1 This article draws upon archival research funded over the years by the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Philosophical Society, and the Fulbright-Hays Commission, support that the author acknowledges with gratitude. An earlier version of this article was given as a paper at the Conference Honoring Boris Fausto, "Rethinking Brazilian History," Center for Latin American Studies, Stanford University, May 2010.

Política parlamentar e a punição do chicote: o significado do fim dos açoites em 1866

Abstract

The Brazilian penalty of the lash was reformed (1886) by a cabinet and parliament opposed to abolition. While the penalty's abuse had been exploited by Abolitionists attempting the cabinet's fall, the cabinet unexpectedly supported its reform. This apparent contradiction has not been satisfactorily addressed; this article attempts to do so. It will demonstrate that the cabinet's support was a cabinet tactic designed to vindicate the cabinet's policies and strength. Nonetheless, the revocation of the state's role in flogging delegitimizing flogging on plantations, too, despite the cabinet's expectations. Indeed, the reform impacted plantation destabilization, which helped lead to the cabinet's fall and the 1888 law abolishing slavery. This complex series of events illustrates the Abolitionist struggle's interweave between parliament, the movement, and slave agency.

Keywords:
Abolitionism; slavery; pena de açoites; Parliament

Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP Estrada do Caminho Velho, 333 - Jardim Nova Cidade , CEP. 07252-312 - Guarulhos - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista.almanack@gmail.com