Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The neurofibromatosis: which one and why?

As neurofibromatoses: qual e por quê?

The number of people in the world with neurofibromatosis (NF) NF1 almost equals the population of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Taking the entirety of Brazil into account, based on an NF1 prevalence of 1/3000 and a 2012 Brazilian population estimate of 197,800,000, presently there are 65,900 Brazilians with NF1. Adding in Brazilians with NF2 and Schwannomatosis, we must acknowledge more or less 70,000 persons with some type of NF in Brazil and thereby recognize this fact to be a substantial challenge to the country’s health care resources. And both distinguishing NF from other disorders and differentiating of NF1, NF2 and Schwannomatosis from each other are the first steps in meeting that challenge. To this end, on this issue of Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria , the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa em Neurofibromatoses 1. Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa em Neurofibromatoses. Neurofibromatosis: part 1 - diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2014;72. , including the Recklinologist par excellence , Rodrigues LOC 2. Rodrigues LO, Rodrigues LOC, Castro LL, Rezende NA, Ribeiro AL. Non-invasive endothelial function assessment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2013;13:18. , 3. Faria LPG, Rodrigues LO, Diniz LM, Rezende NA, Rodrigues LOC. Prevalência de um fenotipo inédito na Neurofibromatose do Tipo 1 - Dados preliminares. Revista Médica de Minas Gerais 2012;22:363-368. , have begun the task of enhancing the clinical diagnosis and management of this complex set of disorders. This enhancement presumes that both the immediate and long-term care of persons with NF1 must and will be shared by specialist Recklinologists and their partners in primary care and other specialties.

On the one hand, it is critically important to itemize and understand the inter-relationships of the various elements of NF1 on their own. On the other hand, realizing how those elements relate to the respective ages of the persons with each of the several NF disorders, may also contribute to their individual health care and to the understanding of the disorder’s pathogenesis in more general terms. For example, virtually everyone with NF1 will manifest café-au-lait spots (CLS) in the first year of life, while an NF2 vestibular schwannoma may not be obvious until the affected person’s 3rd decade or later. And persons affected by Schwannomatosis may only develop problems that appear well beyond childhood and are much more non-specific, such as pain without an otherwise apparent cause.

Reliance on clinical symptoms and signs is at least laudable, and, I would say, commendable. Nonetheless, in at least some problem cases, resort to genetic analyses may be especially contributory, specifically assessing mutations in or deletions (loss) of the NF1 locus on the long arm of human chromosome 17 4. Ko JM, Sohn YB, Jeong SY, Kim HJ, Messiaen LM. Mutation spectrum of NF1 and clinical characteristics in 78 Korean patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Neurol 2013;48:447-453. , the NF2 locus on the long arm of human chromosome 22 or the SMARCB1 locus also on the long arm of human chromosome 22. In addition, somatic mosaicism – especially when there are minimal or topographically limited signs and symptoms – may be a factor in both diagnosis and prognosis, a consideration numerically most important for NF2. And beyond mutational heterogeneity and mosaicism there is also the matter of overlap with disorders utterly distinct from NF1, NF2 and Schwannomatosis. For example, for a very young child with CLS as the sole or primary finding, identifying or discounting a mutation of the SPRED1 locus on the long arm of human chromosome 15 may be very helpful for both the child’s parents and the concerned physician.

Planning for the present and the future is the key. Accurately establishing both the fact of NF and its type at the present time allows the clinicians, the affected person and his or her family to make the most realistic plans for the future. Batista, et al., declare those goals and thoughtfully contribute to their being reached.

References

  • 1
    Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa em Neurofibromatoses. Neurofibromatosis: part 1 - diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2014;72.
  • 2
    Rodrigues LO, Rodrigues LOC, Castro LL, Rezende NA, Ribeiro AL. Non-invasive endothelial function assessment in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2013;13:18.
  • 3
    Faria LPG, Rodrigues LO, Diniz LM, Rezende NA, Rodrigues LOC. Prevalência de um fenotipo inédito na Neurofibromatose do Tipo 1 - Dados preliminares. Revista Médica de Minas Gerais 2012;22:363-368.
  • 4
    Ko JM, Sohn YB, Jeong SY, Kim HJ, Messiaen LM. Mutation spectrum of NF1 and clinical characteristics in 78 Korean patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Pediatr Neurol 2013;48:447-453.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Mar 2014

History

  • Received
    08 Jan 2014
  • Accepted
    15 Jan 2014
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org