Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has no higher costs than ventriculoperitoneal shunt

Terceiro ventriculostomia endoscópica não apresenta custos mais elevados do que a derivação ventrículo peritoneal

Objective:

To evaluate the cost of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) compared to ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) in the treatment of hydrocephalus in children.

Method:

We studied 103 children with hydrocephalus, 52 of which were treated with ETV and 51 with VPS in a prospective cohort. Treatment costs were compared within the first year after surgery, including subsequent surgery or hospitalization.

Results:

Twenty (38.4%) of the 52 children treated with VPS needed another procedure due to shunt failure, compared to 11 (21.5%) of 51 children in the ETV group. The average costs per patient in the group treated with ETV was USD$ 2,177,66±517.73 compared to USD$ 2,890.68±2,835.02 for the VPS group.

Conclusions:

In this series there was no significant difference in costs between the ETV and VPS groups.

hydrocephalus; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; neuroendoscopy; cost analysis


Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO R. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org