Arq Neuropsiquiatr
anp
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr.
0004-282X
1678-4227
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
RESUMO
Antecedentes:
A lesão axonial difusa ocorre em traumas com alta energia de aceleração e desaceleração, determinando desorganização da microestrutura cerebral, levando a algum déficit. A escala de Glasgow Estendida (GOS-E) é indicada na avaliação clínica das vítimas de trauma cranioencefalico. Imagens por tensor de difusão (DTI) estudam a microestrutura cerebral a partir da difusão das moléculas de água.
Objetivo:
Investigar a microestrutura cerebral no primeiro ano após trauma, avaliar clinicamente os pacientes e testar para correlações entre estes resultados.
Métodos:
20 vítimas de TCE moderado e grave foram avaliados 2 meses e 1 ano depois do trauma. O processamento foi feito usando o software FMRIB (FSL) e a análise estatística foi feita com tract-based spatial statistics software para extrair os parâmetros de DTI. Calculamos a diferença da média entre as duas observações de cada sujeito e fizemos um teste-t para uma amostra e threshold-free cluster enhancement. Realizamos correções para múltiplas comparações e determinamos o valor de p < 0.05 como significativo. Um ano após o trauma, a avaliação clínica foi feita usando a GOS-E. Testamos para associações entre os resultados clínicos e os valores médios de FA dos clusters.
Resultados:
Os clusters significativos foram identificados usando o atlas JHU WM. Observamos aumento de FA predominantemente no hemisfério cerebral direito e cerebelar à esquerda e também extensas áreas de aumento nos demais parâmetros de DTI. A recuperação dos pacientes foi satisfatória.
Conclusões:
Não encontramos associações entre os resultados, no entanto alguma associação pequena a moderada não pode ser excluída.
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes different complex brain lesions such as hematomas, contusions, vascular injuries, and diffuse axonal injury (DAI). DAI results from high-energy acceleration and deceleration forces, determining shearing strains in the white matter, leading to disconnection or dysfunction of the neural network1.
Head injuries, particularly DAI, result in distinct functional deficits, such as physical, cognitive, and behavioral impairments, which dramatically affect life quality, return to daily activities, and social reintegration of survivors2. In 1975, Jennett and Bond developed the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), and it was used as a primary outcome measure in phase III trials in TBI3,4. Afterward, acknowledging some limitations of the GOS, the Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOS-E) was developed. Since its establishment in 1981, it has been used and recommended as the primary outcome measurement in TBI studies5,6.
DAI is not only restricted to mechanical forces at the moment of the trauma. Many different processes are triggered, such as inflammatory responses, molecular changes, apoptosis, and Wallerian degeneration. Therefore, the pathophysiology of DAI can be divided into primary and secondary lesions. The primary axonal lesion is the complete disconnection related to the kinetic energy in the moment of trauma. In contrast, secondary axonal injuries are indirect and progressive lesions in neurons that occur late after the initial shock7. The impact sparks molecular and cellular events that disturb the homeostasis, leading to changes in neurons and to the regional microglia that can persist for years8.
Traditional imaging modalities such as computed tomography and standard magnetic resonance (MR) sequences, such as T1 and T2 weighted sequences, are not sensible enough to show the white matter (WM) damage related to DAI. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an advanced MR modality based on water molecules diffusion that measures the preferential displacement along the white matter tracts and has been used to assess the brain microstructure in different pathologies, including head injuries9. There are diverse methods available to analyze DTI images, such as region-of-interest analysis and tractography. One of the most commonly used is the whole-brain approach for group comparisons, for which tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) is particularly recommended for voxel wise and cluster-based analyses, constraining statistical analysis to the center of the tracts9. It is a semi-automated method, with minimal user-dependence, that allows a whole-brain evaluation and is notably suitable for evaluating diffuse lesions in the brain parenchyma such as DAI10,11.
Other groups have used this approach to assess white matter changes in victims of head injury in different stages after trauma12,13. Lipton and colleagues conducted a study on patients with mild TBI who presented with persistent cognitive impairment eight months to three years after the trauma. They found decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased mean diffusivity (MD) in the corpus callosum, subcortical white matter, and internal capsules compared to healthy controls13. Another group investigated adolescents with mild TBI in the acute phase (from 1 to 6 days after the trauma event) compared to age-matched controls14. They found significantly decreased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and radial diffusivity (RD) and increased FA in several white matter regions and the left thalamus, consistent with axonal cytotoxic edema in the acute phase post-injury. However, few published works analyzed the progressive changes in the white matter in DAI, particularly in moderate and severe trauma victims.
This study aimed to investigate longitudinally the white matter of patients with severe and moderate DAI at two moments defined as the subacute (two months) and early chronic phases (one year) following the trauma event. We also assessed patients’ clinical outcome one year after trauma using the GOS-E scale6. Our central hypothesis is that DTI parameters change with time and can have a degree of correlation with functional outcome.
METHODS
Standard protocol approvals
The protocol was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board, the local ethics committee, and all participants gave written informed consent.
Study design and subjects
A prospective study was conducted throughout one year. Adult outpatients admitted at the Emergency Room of Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, victims of moderate and severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores between 3 and 12 at initial evaluation), presenting clinical and tomographic findings exclusively of DAI were eligible to be included in the study. Exclusion criteria were the presence of contusions greater than 10 cm3, midline shift greater than 0.5 cm, extra-axial collection determining compression of the brain parenchyma, or any indication for surgical intervention. Patients with poor quality imaging studies that limited analysis, clinical contra-indications that precluded MR scanning, or loss of follow-up were also excluded.
Data acquisition
All data were acquired on a 3T system (Intera Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). Patients were scanned using an 8-channel head proton coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) at two time-points: two months (subacute phase) and one year (early chronic phase) after the trauma. The routine protocol included fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequences. For the data analysis in this study, we used a volumetric T1-weighted and DTI sequences.
The 3D-T1 fast field echo, acquired in the sagittal plane, was obtained using the following parameters: FOV 240 x 240 x 180 mm3; matrix 240 x 240 mm; isotropic resolution; TR/TE 6.2/2.7 ms; and acquisition time 4.13 min.
The DTI sequence was acquired in the axial plane, using 32 directions and one b0 using the following parameters: 70 slices; slice thickness 2 mm; no gap; field of view 256 x 256 mm; voxel resolution = 2 mm3 (isotropic); TR/TE 8.500/61 ms; b = 1000 s/mm2; matrix 128 x 128; number of excitations (NEX) = 1; and acquisition time of 7 minutes.
Imaging processing and analysis
Initially, all diffusion images were pre-processed for eddy current corrections and extraction of non-brain voxels, using FMRIB's Diffusion Toolbox (FSL) software, version 5.0.119,15. For motion correction, the free toolbox Explore DTI (A. Leemans, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was used, which rotates the B-matrix while keeping the exact initial orientation. With this same software, visual quality inspection for residuals and outliers was performed in each data set16,17.
Thereafter, FA maps were analyzed using TBSS9. All individual FA images were non-linearly registered to the most typical subject of the sample (using -n command), and then the aligned dataset was transformed into the MNI152 standard space (1 mm3). The mean aligned FA images were merged into a single four-dimensional (4D) average FA image. A mean FA skeleton was extracted from the generalized 4D image, and the tracts were projected into the skeleton, using a 0.2 threshold18. To extract mean, axial, and radial diffusivities (MD, AD, and RD, respectively), non-linear warps and skeleton projections were applied to each DTI scalar parameter.
Statistical analysis
To assess differences in FA, MD, RD, and AD with time, we performed one-sample t-tests, using the average difference between the two measures across subjects. Initially, the difference between the subacute and the early chronic phase was calculated, and then the early chronic value minus the subacute phase value was calculated. Permutation-based nonparametric inferences were made on unsmoothed statistical maps, using 5000 permutations, and the cluster-like structures were enhanced using the threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) algorithm19. This approach was similarly applied to the MD, AD, and RD maps. Data were corrected for multiple comparisons, using the family-wise error (FWE) rate, setting the significance level at p < 0.05.
Thenceforth, the cluster tool (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Cluster) was applied to extract the exact clusters, followed by the Atlasquery tool to obtain the coordinates (http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Atlasquery) according to the Johns Hopkins University (JHU) white matter tractography atlas.
Outcome measure
We used the GOS-E at 12 months post-injury obtained at the medical appointment follow-up, which has been recommended as the main outcome measurement in TBI studies7. It consists in an eight-scale global measure of function, used to estimate physical disability grading6. It classifies patients into upper and lower levels of good recovery (GOS-E = 7 and 8), moderate disability (GOS-E = 5 and 6), severe disability (GOS-E = 3 and 4), vegetative state (GOS-E =2) and death (GOS-E =1).
Association analysis
The WM areas with FA differences with time were defined as ROIs and the mean FA values of each one was calculated. Then, to test for association of mean FA values of each ROI with GOS-E grading, we used Cohen’s d effect size test. We segmented patients into two different groups: sub-optimal (GOS-E= 5 or 6) and optimal (GOS-E = 7 or 8) performance. We tested for associations of each ROI at two months and one year after trauma.
Taking into account the relatively small patient sample, we also estimated Cohen’s d effect size test considering a bigger sample size (4 times our sample, with the same distribution).
RESULTS
In the initial screening, 225 patients with head trauma were evaluated, and the final analysis included twenty of those patients. Demographics of the final sample are described in Table 1. Two hundred and five subjects were excluded for the following reasons:
- 186 had no clinical and/or tomographic criteria for DAI;
- 7 follow-up losses;
- 5 were not eligible for MRI;
- 5 had low-quality DTI studies;
- 1 developed epidural compressive hematoma;
- 1 died.
Table 1.
Demographics of the 20 patients included in the study.
Demographics
Sex
Male = 16
Female = 4
Handedness
Right-handed = 16
Left-handed = 4
Traumatic event
Motorcycle = 10
Car accident = 6
Run over = 3
Agression = 1
GCS at hospital admission
Moderate (GCS 9-12) = 14
Severe (GCS < 8) = 6
Interval between trauma and hospital admission
39 minutes (15 to 77 minutes)
One-year outcome
GOS-E 5 = 1
GOS-E 6 = 7
GOS-E 7 = 11
GOS-E 8 = 1
GCS: Glasgow coma scale; GOS-E: Glasgow outcome scale extended.
Evaluation of changes between two months and one year after trauma (chronic minus subacute volumes) with voxel-based TFCE analysis indicated brain regions with FA increment with time, predominantly in the right hemisphere and in the left cerebellum. Significant brain clusters (Table 2) were found in the right superior longitudinal fascicle, the temporal part of the right superior longitudinal fascicle, right inferior fronto-occipital fascicle, right superior and inferior longitudinal fascicles, the body of corpus callosum, forceps major and left corticospinal tract (Figure 1). Moreover, we found extensive areas of increases in MD, RD, and AD (p < 0.05, FWE corrected) (Figure 2).
Table 2.
Significant clusters found in FA analysis.
Cluster Index
Voxels
p
X (mm)
Y (mm)
Z (mm)
Location
7
7
0.007
25
-44
36
R SLF, R IFOF
6
4
0.025
3
3
26
body corpus callosum
5
4
0.024
32
-41
30
R SLF, R SLF (temporal part), R ILF
4
2
0.027
-28
-47
-38
L CST
3
1
0.04
29
-68
11
forceps major, R IFOF, R ILF
2
1
0.038
30
-43
32
R SLF and R ILF
1
1
0.031
33
-35
32
R SLF, R SLF (temporal part)
R SLF: right superior longitudinal fascicle; R IFOF: right inferior frontal-occipital fascicle; R ILF: right inferior longitudinal fascicle; L CST: left cortical spinal tract .
Figure 1.
The most significant clusters found with increments in FA (early chronic phase minus subacute phase) are shown in red, TFCE (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). The mean FA skeleton is indicated in white.
FA: fractional anisotropy.
Figure 2.
White matter differences between early chronic and subacute phases. Significant clusters (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). Blue depicts MD, yellow AD, and green RD increases in the chronic phase.
FWE: family-wise error; MD: mean diffusivity; AD: axial diffusivity; RD: radial diffusivity.
Of note, the one-sample t-test used to assess the difference between subacute and early chronic volumes did not demonstrate significant differences for any DTI parameter.
Correlations between the different FA ROIs and the one-year GOS-E grades were tested with different ROIs at 2 months and 1 year post-trauma (Figures 3 and 4). We did not find any correlations on either moment.
Figure 3.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at 2 months after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between the groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are displayed with respective 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test (squares).
Figure 4.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at one year after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are shown with respective 95% confidence intervals and statical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test.
In addition, by hypothetically increasing our sample 4-fold, we found some associations between one-year GOS-E and the specific ROIs of FA increase at 2 months and 1 year after trauma (Table 3).
Table 3.
Correlation analysis artificially increasing the sample size 4-fold.
Cluster index
p value (2 months)
p value (1 year)
1
0.014
0.009
2
0.056
0.078
3
0.823
0.994
4
0.190
0.398
5
0.020
0.061
6
0.161
0.024
7
0.044
0.685
p value obtained by Cohen’s d test.
DISCUSSION
In our investigation, we performed whole-brain analysis using a semi-automated method to explore white matter changes over time in moderate and severe TBI victims. DTI has mainly been used to study white matter in the trauma scenario. However, most published articles are related to mild trauma and with different follow-up periods12,13,20. It is important to emphasize that our patient sample is very homogeneous, consisting of victims with moderate and severe trauma, who were explicitly and exclusively diagnosed with DAI, and followed for one year after the event.
We found some scattered areas of FA increase, notably in the right brain hemisphere, accompanied by vast regions in the brain and the cerebellum demonstrating an increase in MD, RD, and AD over time. Interestingly, patients showed relatively good clinical outcomes, according to the GOS-E scale. We also found different associations between each brain region with increased FA and the late clinical outcome (GOS-E) two months and one year after trauma, which were more prominent when tested in a larger sample size. Our results are aligned with previous studies that have described white matter changes on DTI parameters over with time in victims of head trauma21,22. These ongoing DTI parameters are related to different pathophysiological processes such as inflammation, degeneration, and regeneration - which have already been described in experimental studies23,24.
We identified a general area of increase in MD, AD, and RD in brain tracts one year after trauma. We consider that the MD increase is mainly a result of high RD values and, in a lower degree, to AD increment. MD represents the overall diffusivity of water molecules, which can be related to the increasing content of isotropic tissue with water content (gliosis)25. Although the biological basis for anisotropy and diffusivity changes in tissues revealed by DTI data is still largely debated, studies using animal models have demonstrated that axonal injury itself is represented by AD changes, and demyelination is associated with an increase in RD values26. Considering that increases in both AD and RD contribute positively to increase in MD values, it is reasonable to assume MD as a more sensitive parameter when compared to FA in our observation.
Moreover, in addition to axonal injury, other important and specific pathophysiological processes are also present in the trauma scenario, such as neuroinflammation, afferent degeneration, and debris clearance, and the magnitude of each one at different stages may imply distinct changes in DTI scalar values. Animal model studies play an essential role in characterizing these other effects of the trauma event and how they change over time. However, most of the articles published to date describe the changes that occur in the early acute time after trauma, and only a limited number of articles evaluate long-term consequences27. It is already well established that the overall axonal injury in trauma survivors is a consequence of the secondary axonal injury, which is the indirect damage to neurons related to neuroinflammation and microglial activation, triggered by the initial impact and that can persist for years23. These processes are responsible for biochemical changes leading to local edema and changes in the microvascular circulation, leading to ischemia and demyelination, which can be confirmed by the RD increase over time28. Moreover, AD increase has been associated with an increase of the extracellular water content, such as debris clearance, that would ease the water molecule movement in an axis parallel to the axons29. Thereby, we suppose that our results can be explained by the Wallerian or Wallerian-like degeneration process due to DAI or related to a secondary pathological process, such as regional ischemia, and neuronal death may ultimately lead to brain atrophy29.
We also found some spotted areas of FA increase in the right brain hemisphere and the left cerebellum over time. Different causes can be associated with FA increase, such as local fibrosis, hemorrhage areas, and neuronal sprouting30. FA is related to the microstructural organization, with high values (close to one) related to most anisotropic tissues. Microstructural organization after trauma has been reported to start in the first few days and can persist for years, which is linked to neuroplasticity31. The functional recovery accompanied by the increase in FA may somehow be related to neuroplasticity. Interestingly, we found areas of FA increase in the right brain hemisphere and in the left cerebellum, which may indicate the involvement of the contralateral cerebellar hemisphere in functional and compensatory changes after trauma, as it has been already reported32. An interesting functional study compared children with moderate and severe trauma to controls, showing that children with TBI demonstrated changes in functional cerebral activity and increased recruitment of neural resources such as the cerebellum32.
We tested for correlations between mean FA values at the subacute and early chronic phases of the specific regions that presented significant changes over time and the GOS-E scores. We could not find any significant correlations, but the lack of significance may be related to our sample size, which was relatively small when considering the optimal number of individuals required for correlational studies33. Still, some specific regions, such as the right SLF and the body of the corpus callosum, demonstrated promising effect sizes in functional stratification at the early chronic phase between optimal and sub-optimal GOS-E scores and mean FA values by using a theoretical larger sample size.
Whole-brain voxel-wise analysis has been increasingly used to study DAI because of the widespread nature of the disorder and the advantage of this method being minimally invasive for multi-subject group evaluation. However, with this technique, it is imperative the use rigorous statistical procedures to correct for multiple comparison errors, which reduce the sensitivity for detecting subtle changes12.
One limitation of our study is the relatively small sample size. However, we included an homogeneous group of patients with a minimum one-year survival after the traumatic event, especially considering that victims of moderate and severe head trauma have high mortality rates in the first six months34,35. Moreover, these patients also presented an excellent recovery with high one-year GOS-E scores. This may be related to the exclusion of other conditions commonly associated with a head injury, such as contusions and hematomas that are related to a worse outcome2.
Concerning the methodology and image acquisition, we must emphasize that more gradient encoding directions and more robust DTI acquisition and analytical methods such as high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), and q-ball imaging are available and could have enhanced the power of data analysis11,36. However, these approaches require longer acquisition times, more sophisticated algorithms, and are still not feasible to implement in clinical and research scenarios.
In conclusion, our work indicated changes in all DTI scalar metrics in the brain and cerebellum white matter in a homogeneous group of DAI victims along the first year following moderate and severe head trauma. This study can be important to guide future research in understanding the different pathophysiological processes that occur at different stages of patient recovery. Further studies are expected to show that DTI is a tool for signaling functional outcomes and is a promising method to guide therapies and rehabilitation procedures in trauma survivors.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are thankful to FAPESP (Sao Paulo Research Foundation) for financial support. Grants 2015/18136-1, 2016/05547-6, 2017/17065-9.
REFERENCES
1. Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, McLellan DR. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology. 1989 Jul;15(1):49-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x
Adams
JH
Doyle
D
Ford
I
Gennarelli
TA
Graham
DI
McLellan
DR
Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading
Histopathology
1989
15
1
49
59
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1989.tb03040.x
2. Esbjörnsson E, Skoglund T, Sunnerhagen KS. Fatigue, psychosocial adaptation and quality of life one year after traumatic brain injury and suspected traumatic axonal injury; evaluations of patients and relatives: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2013 Sep;45(8):771-7. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1170
Esbjörnsson
E
Skoglund
T
Sunnerhagen
KS
Fatigue, psychosocial adaptation and quality of life one year after traumatic brain injury and suspected traumatic axonal injury; evaluations of patients and relatives: a pilot study
J Rehabil Med
2013
45
8
771
777
https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1170
3. Vieira RCA, Paiva WS, de Oliveira DV, Teixeira MJ, de Andrade AF, de Sousa RMC. Diffuse axonal injury: epidemiology, outcome and associated risk factors. Front Neurol. 2016 Oct 20;7:178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00178
Vieira
RCA
Paiva
WS
de Oliveira
DV
Teixeira
MJ
de Andrade
AF
de Sousa
RMC
Diffuse axonal injury: epidemiology, outcome and associated risk factors
Front Neurol
2016
7
178
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2016.00178
4. Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5
Jennett
B
Bond
M
Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage
Lancet
1975
1
7905
480
484
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5
5. Wilde EA, Whiteneck GG, Bogner J, Bushnik T, Cifu DX, Dikmen S, et al. Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Nov 1;91(11):1650-60.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033
Wilde
EA
Whiteneck
GG
Bogner
J
Bushnik
T
Cifu
DX
Dikmen
S
Recommendations for the use of common outcome measures in traumatic brain injury research
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
2010
91
11
1650
1660
e17
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.033
6. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Apr 1;44(4):285-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285
Jennett
B
Snoek
J
Bond
MR
Brooks
N
Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
1981
44
4
285
293
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285
7. Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2013 Aug;246:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013
Johnson
VE
Stewart
W
Smith
DH
Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury
Exp Neurol
2013
246
35
43
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.013
8. Bramlett HM, Dietrich WD. Long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury: current status of potential mechanisms of injury and neurological outcomes. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 1;32(23):1834-48. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3352
Bramlett
HM
Dietrich
WD
Long-term consequences of traumatic brain injury: current status of potential mechanisms of injury and neurological outcomes
J Neurotrauma
2015
32
23
1834
1848
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3352
9. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
Smith
SM
Jenkinson
M
Woolrich
MW
Beckmann
CF
Behrens
TEJ
Johansen-Berg
H
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Neuroimage
2004
23
1
S208
S219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
10. Hulkower MB, Poliak DB, Rosenbaum SB, Zimmerman ME, Lipton ML. A decade of DTI in traumatic brain injury: 10 years and 100 articles later. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(11):2064-74. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3395
Hulkower
MB
Poliak
DB
Rosenbaum
SB
Zimmerman
ME
Lipton
ML
A decade of DTI in traumatic brain injury: 10 years and 100 articles later
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2013
34
11
2064
2074
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3395
11. Su E, Bell M. Diffuse axonal injury. In: Laskowitz D, Grant G, editors. Translational research in traumatic brain injury. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. Chapter 3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326722/
Su
E
Bell
M
Diffuse axonal injury
Laskowitz
D
Grant
G
Translational research in traumatic brain injury
Boca Raton (FL)
CRC Press/Taylor and Francis Group
2016
Chapter 3
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326722/
12. Garin-Muga A, Borro D. Review and challenges of brain analysis through DTI measurements. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;207:27-36. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-474-9-27
Garin-Muga
A
Borro
D
Review and challenges of brain analysis through DTI measurements
Stud Health Technol Inform
2014
207
27
36
https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-474-9-27
13. Lipton ML, Gellella E, Lo C, Gold T, Ardekani BA, Shifteh K, et al. Multifocal white matter ultrastructural abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive disbility: a voxel-wise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurotrauma. 2008 Nov;25(11):1335-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0547
Lipton
ML
Gellella
E
Lo
C
Gold
T
Ardekani
BA
Shifteh
K
Multifocal white matter ultrastructural abnormalities in mild traumatic brain injury with cognitive disbility: a voxel-wise analysis of diffusion tensor imaging
J Neurotrauma
2008
25
11
1335
1342
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0547
14. Chu Z, Wilde EA, Hunter JV, Mccauley SR, Bigler ED, Troyanskaya M, et al. Voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010 Feb;31(2):340-6. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1806
Chu
Z
Wilde
EA
Hunter
JV
Mccauley
SR
Bigler
ED
Troyanskaya
M
Voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging in mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
2010
31
2
340
346
https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1806
15. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6
Jenkinson
M
Smith
S
A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images
Med Image Anal
2001
5
2
143
156
https://doi.org/10.1016/s1361-8415(01)00036-6
16. Leemans A, Jones DK. The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jun;61(6):1336-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21890
Leemans
A
Jones
DK
The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data
Magn Reson Med
2009
61
6
1336
1349
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21890
17. Leemans A, Jeurissen B, Sijbers J, Jones DK. ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 2009 Jan;17(2):3537.
Leemans
A
Jeurissen
B
Sijbers
J
Jones
DK
ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data
Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med
2009
17
2
3537
18. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1487-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024
Smith
SM
Jenkinson
M
Johansen-berg
H
Rueckert
D
Nichols
TE
Mackay
CE
Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data
Neuroimage
2006
31
4
1487
1505
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024
19. Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage. 2009 Jan 1;44(1):83-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061
Smith
SM
Nichols
TE
Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference
Neuroimage
2009
44
1
83
98
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061
20. Wallace EJ, Mathias JL, Ward L. Relationship between diffusion tensor imaging findings and cognitive outcomes following adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Sep;92:93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.023
Wallace
EJ
Mathias
JL
Ward
L
Relationship between diffusion tensor imaging findings and cognitive outcomes following adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis
Neurosci Biobehav Rev
2018
92
93
103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.023
21. O’Phelan KH, Otoshi CK, Ernst T, Chang L. Common patterns of regional brain injury detectable by diffusion tensor imaging in otherwise normal-appearing white matter in patients with early moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Mar 1;35(5):739-49. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4944
O’Phelan
KH
Otoshi
CK
Ernst
T
Chang
L
Common patterns of regional brain injury detectable by diffusion tensor imaging in otherwise normal-appearing white matter in patients with early moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
J Neurotrauma
2018
35
5
739
749
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4944
22. Leon AMC, Cicuendez M, Navarro B, Munarriz PM, Cepeda S, Paredes I, et al. What can we learn from diffusion tensor imaging from a large traumatic brain injury cohort?: white matter integrity and its relationship with outcome. J Neurotrauma. 2018 Oct 15;35(20):2365-76. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5691
Leon
AMC
Cicuendez
M
Navarro
B
Munarriz
PM
Cepeda
S
Paredes
I
What can we learn from diffusion tensor imaging from a large traumatic brain injury cohort?: white matter integrity and its relationship with outcome
J Neurotrauma
2018
35
20
2365
2376
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2018.5691
23. Sullivan GM, Mierzwa AJ, Kijpaisalratana N, Tang H, Wang Y, Song S-K, et al. Oligodendrocyte lineage and subventricular zone response to traumatic axonal injury in the corpus callosum. J Neuropath Exp Neurol. 2013 Dec 1;72(12):1106-25. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000009
Sullivan
GM
Mierzwa
AJ
Kijpaisalratana
N
Tang
H
Wang
Y
Song
S-K
Oligodendrocyte lineage and subventricular zone response to traumatic axonal injury in the corpus callosum
J Neuropath Exp Neurol
2013
72
12
1106
1125
https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0000000000000009
24. Tu T-W, Williams RA, Lescher JD, Jikaria N, Turtzo LC, Frank JA. Radiological-pathological correlation of diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer imaging in closed head traumatic brain injury model. Ann Neurol. 2016 Jun;79(6):907-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24641
Tu
T-W
Williams
RA
Lescher
JD
Jikaria
N
Turtzo
LC
Frank
JA
Radiological-pathological correlation of diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer imaging in closed head traumatic brain injury model
Ann Neurol
2016
79
6
907
920
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24641
25. Pierpaoli C, Barnett A, Pajevic S, Chen R, Penix LR, Virta A, et al. Water diffusion changes in wallerian degeneration and their dependence on white matter architecture. Neuroimage. 2001 Jun;13(6):1174-85. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0765
Pierpaoli
C
Barnett
A
Pajevic
S
Chen
R
Penix
LR
Virta
A
Water diffusion changes in wallerian degeneration and their dependence on white matter architecture
Neuroimage
2001
13
6
1174
1185
https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0765
26. Song S-K, Sun S-W, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, Cross AH. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1429-36. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1267
Song
S-K
Sun
S-W
Ramsbottom
MJ
Chang
C
Russell
J
Cross
AH
Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water
Neuroimage
2002
17
3
1429
1436
https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1267
27. Osier ND, Carlson SW, DeSana A, Dixon CE. Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals. J Neurotrauma. 2015 Dec 1;32(23):1861-82. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3680
Osier
ND
Carlson
SW
DeSana
A
Dixon
CE
Chronic histopathological and behavioral outcomes of experimental traumatic brain injury in adult male animals
J Neurotrauma
2015
32
23
1861
1882
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2014.3680
28. Rubovitch V, Ten-Bosch M, Zohar O, Harrison CR, Tempel-Brami C, Stein E, et al. A mouse model of blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2011 Dec;232(2):280-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.018
Rubovitch
V
Ten-Bosch
M
Zohar
O
Harrison
CR
Tempel-Brami
C
Stein
E
A mouse model of blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury
Exp Neurol
2011
232
2
280
289
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.018
29. Hutchinson EB, Schwerin SC, Avram AV, Juliano SL, Pierpaoli C. Diffusion MRI and the detection of alterations following traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Res. 2018 Apr;96(4):612-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24065
Hutchinson
EB
Schwerin
SC
Avram
AV
Juliano
SL
Pierpaoli
C
Diffusion MRI and the detection of alterations following traumatic brain injury
J Neurosci Res
2018
96
4
612
625
https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24065
30. Genc S, Anderson V, Ryan NP, Malpas CB, Catroppa C, Beauchamp M, et al. Recovery of white matter following paediatric traumatic brain injury depends on injury severity. J Neurotrauma. 2017 Feb 15;34(4):798-806. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4584
Genc
S
Anderson
V
Ryan
NP
Malpas
CB
Catroppa
C
Beauchamp
M
Recovery of white matter following paediatric traumatic brain injury depends on injury severity
J Neurotrauma
2017
34
4
798
806
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2016.4584
31. Harris NG, Verley DR, Gutman BA, Sutton RL. Bi-directional changes in fractional anisotropy after experiment TBI: disorganization and reorganization? Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:129-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.012
Harris
NG
Verley
DR
Gutman
BA
Sutton
RL
Bi-directional changes in fractional anisotropy after experiment TBI: disorganization and reorganization?
Neuroimage
2016
133
129
143
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.012
32. Caeyenberghs K, Wenderoth N, Smits-Engelsman BCM, Sunaert S, Swinnen SP. Neural correlates of motor dysfunction in children with traumatic brain injury: exploration of compensatory recruitment patterns. Brain. 2009 Mar;132(3):684-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn344
Caeyenberghs
K
Wenderoth
N
Smits-Engelsman
BCM
Sunaert
S
Swinnen
SP
Neural correlates of motor dysfunction in children with traumatic brain injury: exploration of compensatory recruitment patterns
Brain
2009
132
3
684
694
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn344
33. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size - or why the P value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012 Sep;4(3):279-82. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
Sullivan
GM
Feinn
R
Using effect size - or why the P value is not enough
J Grad Med Educ
2012
4
3
279
282
https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1
34. Saatman KE, Duhaime A-C, Bullock R, Maas AIR, Valadka A, Manley GT, et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma. 2008 Jul;25(7):719-38. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0586
Saatman
KE
Duhaime
A-C
Bullock
R
Maas
AIR
Valadka
A
Manley
GT
Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies
J Neurotrauma
2008
25
7
719
738
https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2008.0586
35. Brown AW, Leibson CL, Mandrekar J, Ransom JE, Malec JF. Long-term survival after traumatic brain injury: a population-based analysis controlled for nonhead trauma. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):E1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e318280d3e6
Brown
AW
Leibson
CL
Mandrekar
J
Ransom
JE
Malec
JF
Long-term survival after traumatic brain injury: a population-based analysis controlled for nonhead trauma
J Head Trauma Rehabil
2014
29
1
E1
E8
https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0b013e318280d3e6
36. Grassi DC, Conceição DMD, Leite CC, Andrade CS. Current contribution of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of diffuse axonal injury. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2018 Mar;76(3):189-99. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20180007
Grassi
DC
Conceição
DMD
Leite
CC
Andrade
CS
Current contribution of diffusion tensor imaging in the evaluation of diffuse axonal injury
Arq Neuropsiquiatr
2018
76
3
189
199
https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20180007
Support:
Grants 2015/18136-1, 2016/05547-6 and 2017/17065-9 from São Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP.
Autoria
Daphine Centola Grassi
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, Speech and Feeding Disorders Lab, Boston, USA.Massachusetts General HospitalUSABoston, USAMassachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, Speech and Feeding Disorders Lab, Boston, USA.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUSADallas, USAUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Alliar Group, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Alliar GroupBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilAlliar Group, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
MCGO, CCL, VMPG, WSP: contributions for the design of the work; ALZ, FSF, FBCM, VMPG: contributions in the collection of data; DCG, CSA: contributions in the analysis of data; All authors: contributions in the writing, critical revision and final approval.
SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Radiologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Investigação Médica 44, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, Speech and Feeding Disorders Lab, Boston, USA.Massachusetts General HospitalUSABoston, USAMassachusetts General Hospital, Institute of Health Professions, Speech and Feeding Disorders Lab, Boston, USA.
Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Universidade de São PauloBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Departamento de Neurologia, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterUSADallas, USAUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Alliar Group, São Paulo SP, Brazil.Alliar GroupBrazilSão Paulo, SP, BrazilAlliar Group, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
Figure 1.
The most significant clusters found with increments in FA (early chronic phase minus subacute phase) are shown in red, TFCE (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). The mean FA skeleton is indicated in white.
Figure 2.
White matter differences between early chronic and subacute phases. Significant clusters (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). Blue depicts MD, yellow AD, and green RD increases in the chronic phase.
Figure 3.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at 2 months after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between the groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are displayed with respective 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test (squares).
Figure 4.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at one year after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are shown with respective 95% confidence intervals and statical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test.
Table 3.
Correlation analysis artificially increasing the sample size 4-fold.
imageFigure 1.
The most significant clusters found with increments in FA (early chronic phase minus subacute phase) are shown in red, TFCE (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). The mean FA skeleton is indicated in white.
open_in_new
FA: fractional anisotropy.
imageFigure 2.
White matter differences between early chronic and subacute phases. Significant clusters (p < 0.05, FWE corrected). Blue depicts MD, yellow AD, and green RD increases in the chronic phase.
open_in_new
imageFigure 3.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at 2 months after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between the groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are displayed with respective 95% confidence intervals and statistical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test (squares).
open_in_new
imageFigure 4.
Subgroup analysis. The forest plot shows the effect size in the outcome variable across the pre-specified subgroups according to GOS-E outcome stratification (moderate disability vs good recovery). Association analysis between different ROIs at one year after trauma with sub-optimal and optimal 1-year post-trauma GOS-E scores. Horizontal axis indicates differences between groups of recovery according to each cluster. Effect size values are shown with respective 95% confidence intervals and statical significance (p) obtained by Cohen’s d test.
open_in_new
table_chartTable 1.
Demographics of the 20 patients included in the study.
Demographics
Sex
Male = 16
Female = 4
Handedness
Right-handed = 16
Left-handed = 4
Traumatic event
Motorcycle = 10
Car accident = 6
Run over = 3
Agression = 1
GCS at hospital admission
Moderate (GCS 9-12) = 14
Severe (GCS < 8) = 6
Interval between trauma and hospital admission
39 minutes (15 to 77 minutes)
One-year outcome
GOS-E 5 = 1
GOS-E 6 = 7
GOS-E 7 = 11
GOS-E 8 = 1
table_chartTable 2.
Significant clusters found in FA analysis.
Cluster Index
Voxels
p
X (mm)
Y (mm)
Z (mm)
Location
7
7
0.007
25
-44
36
R SLF, R IFOF
6
4
0.025
3
3
26
body corpus callosum
5
4
0.024
32
-41
30
R SLF, R SLF (temporal part), R ILF
4
2
0.027
-28
-47
-38
L CST
3
1
0.04
29
-68
11
forceps major, R IFOF, R ILF
2
1
0.038
30
-43
32
R SLF and R ILF
1
1
0.031
33
-35
32
R SLF, R SLF (temporal part)
table_chartTable 3.
Correlation analysis artificially increasing the sample size 4-fold.
Cluster index
p value (2 months)
p value (1 year)
1
0.014
0.009
2
0.056
0.078
3
0.823
0.994
4
0.190
0.398
5
0.020
0.061
6
0.161
0.024
7
0.044
0.685
Como citar
Grassi, Daphine Centola et al. Análise longitudinal do encéfalo por tensor de difusão em lesão axonal difusa. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria [online]. 2022, v. 80, n. 3 [Acessado 3 Abril 2025], pp. 280-288. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0595>. Epub 18 Mar 2022. ISSN 1678-4227. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X-ANP-2020-0595.
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEUROR. Vergueiro, 1353 sl.1404 - Ed. Top Towers Offices Torre Norte, 04101-000 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel.: +55 11 5084-9463 | +55 11 5083-3876 -
São Paulo -
SP -
Brazil E-mail: revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
rss_feed
Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.