Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Peer support implementation strategy in the Primary Health Care setting: scoping review

Abstract

Objective

To map the use of the peer support implementation strategy in the Primary Health Care (PHC) setting through a scoping review of randomized clinical trials, reporting its results in health and the implementation process.

Methods

The development of this scoping review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Scopus, SciELO, PubMed, Web of Science databases and gray literature were searched. Articles published in the seven previous years (2017 to 2023) related to the Primary Health Care setting, and reporting health outcomes and at least one implementation outcome were selected.

Results

Initially, 259 articles were mapped. After removing duplicates and applying the criteria, 15 were selected. The health problems addressed were mostly related to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and chronic non-communicable diseases. The main implementation outcomes presented involved adoption, acceptability, reach, fidelity, feasibility, sustainability and appropriateness. Few studies adopted theoretical implementation frameworks to conduct and report the findings.

Conclusion

The peer support strategy has been used in some PHC settings, with mapping that covers areas such as mental health, STIs and chronic non-communicable diseases. Positive health impacts included viral suppression of HIV, significant reduction in systolic blood pressure, and a decrease in the amount of alcohol consumed. However, studies analyzing effectiveness in other PHC scenarios are still lacking, especially regarding fidelity, feasibility, sustainability, appropriateness and cost.

Implementation Science; Public health; Peer influence; Primary health care; Health promotion

Resumo

Objetivo

Este estudo teve como objetivo mapear, por meio de uma revisão de escopo de ensaios clínicos randomizados, a utilização da estratégia de implementação do apoio por pares em contextos da Atenção Primária à Saúde (APS), para tanto, relatando seus resultados na saúde e no processo de implementação.

Métodos

Foi utilizada como guia para a revisão de escopo a metodologia do Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). As bases Scopus, Scielo, Pubmed, Web of Science e literatura cinzenta foram pesquisadas. Artigos publicados nos últimos 7 anos (2017 a 2023), relacionados ao contexto da Atenção Primária à Saúde e que reportam desfechos de saúde e ao menos um desfecho de implementação foram selecionados.

Resultados

Inicialmente, foram mapeados 259 artigos e, após remoção de duplicatas e aplicação dos critérios, 15 foram selecionados. Os problemas de saúde abordados foram, em sua maioria, relacionados ao vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV) e outras infecções sexualmente transmissíveis e doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. Os principais desfechos de implementação apresentados envolveram adoção, aceitabilidade, alcance, fidelidade, viabilidade, sustentabilidade e adequação. Poucos estudos utilizaram-se de modelos teóricos de implementação para condução e reporte dos achados.

Conclusão

A estratégia de apoio por pares tem sido empregada em alguns cenários da Atenção Primária à Saúde, com mapeamento que abrange áreas como saúde mental, infecções sexualmente transmissíveis e doenças crônicas não transmissíveis. Os impactos positivos na saúde incluíram a supressão viral do HIV, a redução significativa da pressão arterial sistólica e a diminuição na quantidade de álcool consumido. Todavia, ainda, faltam estudos para analisar a efetividade em outros cenários da APS, sobretudo, quanto à fidelidade, viabilidade, sustentabilidade, adequação e custo.

Protocolo do estudo: PROTOCOL INTEGER ID 81603

Ciência de implementação; Saúde pública; Influência dos pares; Atenção primária à saúde; Promoção da saúde

Resumen

Objetivo

Este estudio tuvo como objetivo mapear, mediante una revisión de alcance de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, la utilización de la estrategia de implementación del apoyo de pares en contextos de la Atención Primaria de Salud (APS), para lo cual se relataron los resultados en la salud y en el proceso de implementación.

Métodos

Se utilizó la metodología del Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) como guía para la revisión de alcance. Las bases consultadas fueron Scopus, Scielo, Pubmed, Web of Science y literatura gris. Se seleccionaron artículos publicados en los últimos siete años (2017 a 2023), relacionados con el contexto de la Atención Primaria de Salud, que relatan resultados en la salud y al menos un resultado sobre la implementación.

Resultados

Inicialmente se mapearon 259 artículos y, después de eliminar los duplicados y aplicar los criterios, se seleccionaron 15. Los problemas de salud tratados fueron, en su mayoría, relacionados con el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) y otras infecciones de transmisión sexual y enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. Los principales resultados de implementación presentados incluyeron adopción, aceptabilidad, alcance, fidelidad, viabilidad, sustentabilidad y adecuación. Pocos estudios utilizaron modelos teóricos de implementación para conducir e informar los resultados.

Conclusión

La estrategia de apoyo de pares se ha empleado en algunos escenarios de la Atención Primaria de Salud, con un mapeo que incluye áreas como salud mental, infecciones de transmisión sexual y enfermedades crónicas no transmisibles. Los impactos positivos en la salud incluyeron la supresión viral del VIH, la reducción significativa de la presión arterial sistólica y la disminución de la cantidad de alcohol consumido. Sin embargo, aún faltan estudios para analizar la efectividad en otros escenarios de la APS, sobre todo con relación a la fidelidad, viabilidad, sustentabilidad, adecuación y costo.

Ciencia de la implementación; Salud pública; Influencia de los compañeros; Atención primaria de salud; Promoción de la salud

Introduction

Peer support is the implementation strategy defined as a transfer of common experiences by individuals belonging to the same territory or facing the same social, cultural or health challenges. Implementation strategies point to the methodology for changing healthcare practices and seek to improve aspects related to adoption, implementation and sustainability.(11. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139.) In the taxonomy of implementation strategies proposed by Powell et al. (2015),(22. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):21.) peer support recruits, assigns and trains for leadership.

In this context, the “peer” aims to support and strengthen the other’s resilience through knowledge gained from shared experience.(33. Penney D. Defining 'Peer Support': Implications for Policy, Practice, and Research. Advocates for Human Potential. 2018;30(3):1-11.) In another definition, the peer support strategy refers to the use of non-professionals who are assigned to the position of “leaders” and work by technically and emotionally helping people with social weaknesses or certain illnesses to adopt, transform and/or strengthen their health habits.(44. Garn SD, Glümer C, Villadsen SF, Malling GM, Christensen U. Understanding the mechanisms generating outcomes in a Danish peer support intervention for socially vulnerable people with type 2-diabetes: a realist evaluation. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):160.) Thus, peer support has been expanding in interventions that involve the health of the community, while its adoption is solidified in different health scenarios, such as chronic diseases, sexual and reproductive health and mental health.(55. Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: a scoping review. Eval Program Plann. 2018;68:19-33. Review.) This strategy assigns groups with similar problems the role of providing support to individuals with coping difficulties.

Peer support started as a patient-centered care tool, aiming to improve the prevention of health problems and reduce the costs of disease interventions. There are studies showing the benefits of peer support in combating cardiovascular diseases in relation to a reduction in systolic pressure, decrease in waist circumference and weight loss.(66. Majjouti K, Küppers L, Thielmann A, Redaélli M, Vitinius F, Funke C, et al. Family doctors' attitudes toward peer support programs for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease: an exploratory survey among German practitioners. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):220.)

The use of peer support can play a decisive role in the recovery of patients with mental illness, and help with early diagnosis, coping with mental illness, autism spectrum disorder and the socialization of these individuals.(77. Ramos FS, Bittencourt DD, Camargo SP, Schmidt C. Intervenção mediada por pares no engajamento acadêmico de alunos com autismo. Rev Bras Educ Espec. 2021;27:e0261.,88. Prat Vigué G, Cano Prieto I, Del Río Sáez R, Vilanova Masana R, Simó Algado S. Training peer support workers in mental health care: a mixed methods study in central Catalonia. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:791724.) Peer support has also been important in accepting and accessing information about the prevention of HIV infection.(99. Topping KJ. Peer Education and peer counselling for health and well-being: a review of reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6064. Review.)

In the Primary Health Care (PHC) setting, this implementation strategy can act as a bridge between the health professional/service and interventions involving the health of communities, thereby assisting in care in health units, as support leaders can help with engaging users and the community in preventive behaviors.(1010. Mayer MK, Urlaub DM, Guzman-Corrales LM, Kowitt SD, Shea CM, Fisher EB. "They're doing something that actually no one else can do": a qualitative study of peer support and primary care integration. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38 Suppl 1:S1.) Currently, several other documented peer support programs have obtained excellent results in improving the quality of life and clinical conditions of patients who participated in this intervention modality – which is considered innovative for health services.(66. Majjouti K, Küppers L, Thielmann A, Redaélli M, Vitinius F, Funke C, et al. Family doctors' attitudes toward peer support programs for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease: an exploratory survey among German practitioners. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):220.)

Implementation strategies are crucial for the successful implementation of health policies and interventions, especially in PHC. Although peer support is a promising strategy to optimize the implementation of health interventions in PHC, it is necessary to better understand how this approach can be adapted to different care realities, integrated into the health system and about its costs and benefits in comparison to other implementation strategies.(1111. Kent M. Developing a Strategy to Embed Peer Support into Mental Health Systems. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(3):271-6.) Knowing the randomized clinical trials that used the peer implementation strategy may be a way to elucidate a promising field of research with the aim to facilitate the process of implementing interventions in public health and understand potential barriers and facilitators of this public health strategy. Understanding knowledge gaps for the application of this implementation technique would also be necessary to strengthen PHC in its varied settings.

The aim of this study was to map the use of the peer support implementation strategy in the PHC setting through a scoping review of randomized clinical trials and report its outcomes in health and the implementation process.

Methods

The peer support implementation strategy in healthcare is investigated in this scoping review study. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology was used as a guide for the review, seeking to map the implementation outcomes evaluated in studies in which the peer support strategy was implemented in PHC.(1212. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.) Since this is a scoping review, the study did not aim to evaluate the quality of clinical trials, but rather to specify data that supports and enables the understanding of knowledge gaps relevant to the topic.

Data collection was guided by the Participants (Population), Concept and Context (PCC) strategy.(1313. Medeiros HP, Teixeira E. Metodologia da pesquisa para a enfermagem e saúde: resenha de livro. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(5):1000-1.) The population was represented by studies of adolescents, adults or older adults who had participated in clinical trials; the concept involved peer support; and the context was related to PHC. The research question was: “What are the results achieved in health and in implementation with the peer support strategy in Primary Health Care?”.

The searches were carried out in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, SciELO and Scopus. The Catalog of Theses and Dissertations from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) was used for the gray literature (dissertations and theses). The electronic search strategy was carried out using keywords related to (peer influence or peer support or peer) AND (implementation science or implementation or implementation outcomes or hybrid designs) AND (health or health services research or chronic health) AND (primary health care or Family health strategy) AND (randomized clinical trials). The search was carried out from January 2017 to April 2023, limited to articles that met the eligibility criteria: a) Results of randomized clinical trials that evaluated implementation by peers; b) Having evaluated at least one health outcome; c) Reporting at least one implementation outcome.

The selection of articles was carried out as follows: in the first stage, the search strategy was developed by combining the already mentioned descriptors used on the databases. In the second stage, filters were applied (clinical trial; English and Portuguese languages; publication date from 2017 to 2023) and the retrieved articles were initially stored in the EndNote® bibliography manager software, from which duplicates were removed automatically and, later, manually. At this point, the titles and abstracts were read with the aim to assess if the articles corresponded to the research question. Finally, the pre-selected articles were read in full, identifying more precisely their relevance to the review and if inclusion and exclusion criteria were met. At this last stage, relevant data for analysis were extracted.

Reviewers independently mapped the data, discussed the results, and continually updated the data graph form in an interative process. Three reviewers, RAB, JAVC and JRL, were involved in the screening process and inconsistencies were discussed in advance.

The study protocol was published on the protocols.io platform (https://www.protocols.io/private/0664E5E62A91807BE599BD530819A602).

The following data were extracted from the articles and organized in a Microsoft Excel 2010 table: theme, title, author, year of publication, location, type of study, objective of the study, description of the intervention, health outcome, in-service outcome and implementation outcome.

The definitions provided by Lorthios-Guilledroit et al. (2018)(55. Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: a scoping review. Eval Program Plann. 2018;68:19-33. Review.) were used to determine the outcomes examined in the studies, as implementation outcomes were not always clearly stated in the articles. Eight implementation outcomes among all sought were considered more important, namely: 1) Acceptability: perception among users that the intervention is acceptable; 2) Adoption: intention, initial decision or action to try to adopt a new intervention by participating users; 3) Appropriateness: perception of the relevance of the intervention in a particular context or for a specific audience; 4) Feasibility: extent to which a new intervention can be carried out in a context or organization; 5) Fidelity: degree to which the intervention is delivered as initially planned without the need for adaptation; 6) Implementation Cost: incremental (and total) cost of the implementation strategy; 7) Coverage/Reach: degree to which the eligible population to receive the intervention actually receives it; 8) Sustainability: extent to which an intervention is maintained and institutionalized in a given context.

Results

The search strategy initially used resulted in 259 articles; 148 on PubMed, 71 on Web of Science, 40 on Scopus and zero on SciELO and the Capes platform. After analyzing duplicates, 35 were excluded, resulting in 224 articles. After reading the title and abstract, 64 were selected for full reading and 15 were selected for analysis, as they met all inclusion criteria (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Selection of studies included in the scoping review

For the most part, the addressed health problems were related to HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and chronic non-communicable diseases, which are sensitive topics to the operating context of PHC. The main implementation outcomes presented involved adoption,(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.

15. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.

16. Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.

17. Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e264-75.

18. Sam-Agudu NA, Ramadhani HO, Isah C, Erekaha S, Fan-Osuala C, Anaba U, et al. The impact of structured mentor mother programs on presentation for early infant diagnosis testing in rural north-central nigeria: a prospective paired cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(Suppl 2):S182-9.

19. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.

20. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.

21. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.

22. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.

23. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.
-2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) acceptability,(2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.

26. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.
-2727. Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Nag Chowdhuri R, Smith G, Chintu N, Ngo TD. The evaluation of the Woman's Condom marketing approach: what value did peer-led interpersonal communication add to the promotion of a new female condom in urban Lusaka? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225832.) reach,(2020. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.,2323. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.,2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) fidelity,(2020. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.,2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.,2828. Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.) feasibility,(2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.) sustainability(2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) and appropriateness.(1717. Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e264-75.,2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.) No study evaluated the cost. In five out of the 15 articles selected, a theoretical framework was used in the development of the study, including: RE-AIM (n=2),(2323. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.,2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) RE-AIM and PIPE (n=2)(2020. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.,2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.) and Proctor (n=1),(2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.) while in ten studies, a theoretical implementation framework was not used to support the study. In chart 1, health outcomes were concentrated in six major themes: mental health (n=1),(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.) infectious diseases/STIs (n=5),(1515. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.

16. Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.

17. Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e264-75.
-1818. Sam-Agudu NA, Ramadhani HO, Isah C, Erekaha S, Fan-Osuala C, Anaba U, et al. The impact of structured mentor mother programs on presentation for early infant diagnosis testing in rural north-central nigeria: a prospective paired cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(Suppl 2):S182-9.,2525. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.) chronic non-communicable diseases (n=4),(2020. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.,2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.,2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.,2929. P Suseela R, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, Vasudevan BK, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.) health education (n=2),(2222. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.,2727. Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Nag Chowdhuri R, Smith G, Chintu N, Ngo TD. The evaluation of the Woman's Condom marketing approach: what value did peer-led interpersonal communication add to the promotion of a new female condom in urban Lusaka? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225832.) neglected diseases (n=2)(2323. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.,2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) and one involved health promotion.(2828. Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.)

Chart 1
. Information from clinical studies on peer support in PHC

Discussion

Three main points stood out among the main findings of this scoping review. First, when the peer support strategy was evaluated through clinical trials, it has promoted some significant results in health outcomes such as chronic diseases(1919. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.

20. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.

21. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.

22. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.

23. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.

24. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.

25. Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.
-2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.) and STIs.(1616. Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.,1717. Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e264-75.) Second, gaps have been observed in the use of peer support, such as the constant absence of theoretical implementation frameworks to support the study.(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.,1515. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.) Third, there were few reports on fidelity outcomes, an essential outcome to assess if interventions are being conducted as planned, as well as few randomized clinical studies addressing peer support in the current PHC setting. The peer support strategy is not a new intervention methodology within PHC(77. Ramos FS, Bittencourt DD, Camargo SP, Schmidt C. Intervenção mediada por pares no engajamento acadêmico de alunos com autismo. Rev Bras Educ Espec. 2021;27:e0261.) and presents barriers and facilitators for its clinical practice.(3030. Cordeiro L, Baldini Soares C. Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. Bol Inst Saúde. 2020;20(2):37-43. Review.)

Although the peer support strategy is more consolidated in the field of mental health,(3131. Ho KH, Yang C, Leung AK, Bressington D, Chien WT, Cheng Q, et al. Peer Support and Mental Health of Migrant Domestic Workers: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7617. Review.) only one article on this topic was found in this review, reporting the threat to life (self-mutilation) as the most common serious adverse event.(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.) The primary outcome was psychiatric readmission 12 months after discharge. Despite showing good adoption, health outcomes did not reveal significant effects; the adjusted risk ratio for readmission was 0.97 (95%CI 0.82; 1.14) and the adjusted odds ratio for readmission was 0.93 (95%CI 0.66; 1.30). The unadjusted risk difference was 0.03 (95% CI −0.11; 0.05) in favor of the peer support group, showing no significant effects between the control group and the intervention arm.

In recent years, peer support in the PHC setting has been more used to address STIs,(3232. Han S, Zhang Y, Yang X, Chai X, Guo J, Zhang L, et al. The effectiveness and sustainability of peer support interventions for persons living with HIV: a realist synthesis. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(2):e010966.) which is defined as an important complement to medical treatments in the area.(3131. Ho KH, Yang C, Leung AK, Bressington D, Chien WT, Cheng Q, et al. Peer Support and Mental Health of Migrant Domestic Workers: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7617. Review.) Implementations in the field of STIs /HIV proved to be statistically successful, in line with the literature,(3333. Øgård-Repål A, Berg RC, Fossum M. Peer support for people living with HIV: a scoping review. Health Promot Pract. 2023;24(1):172-90. Review.) bringing viral suppression as health outcomes, such as the study addressing puerperal women with greater adoption of the intervention to the detriment of those with lower adoption,(1515. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.) and the implementation outcome related to positive effects.(1616. Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.) Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome continues to be an important public health problem, and the results of these randomized clinical trials can support positive strategies for HIV viral suppression in PHC.(3434. Lioi FM, Sousa LR, Elias HC, Gerin L, Gir E, Reis RK. Tratamento como prevenção na perspectiva de pessoas vivendo com HIV/aids. Acta Paul Enferm. 2023;36:eAPE012323.)

Studies on Diabetes Mellitus and Systemic Arterial Hypertension were conducted in the context of chronic non-communicable diseases and reported positive outcomes.(1919. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.,2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.,2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.) The interventions brought the health outcomes of a significant drop in systolic blood pressure(1919. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.) and lower amount of alcohol consumed in the intervention groups (2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.,2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.) compared to control groups. The implementation outcomes more discussed in this topic were adoption,(2020. Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.,2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.,2929. P Suseela R, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, Vasudevan BK, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.) acceptability, reach and fidelity.(2929. P Suseela R, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, Vasudevan BK, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.) The study that evaluated implementation costs(2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.) pointed to a relatively low-cost intervention; U$ 22.5 per patient per year.

Neglected diseases are important topics for PHC. Tuberculosis was the subject of two randomized clinical studies using peer support to strengthen adherence to disease treatment.(2323. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.,2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) Even using the RE-AIM theoretical framework, none of the studies obtained a significant statistical difference, thus revealing implementation outcomes with low levels of reach and adoption,(2323. Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107., 2424. Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.) and in both studies, the outcome of implementation fidelity was not reported.

Education and health promotion, which are primary policies in PHC, were addressed in randomized studies that did not use theoretical implementation frameworks, possibly explaining the inconclusive or non-significant health outcomes found.(2222. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.,2727. Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Nag Chowdhuri R, Smith G, Chintu N, Ngo TD. The evaluation of the Woman's Condom marketing approach: what value did peer-led interpersonal communication add to the promotion of a new female condom in urban Lusaka? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225832.,2828. Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.) The studies reported as outcomes of implementation, the adoption, effect,(2222. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.) acceptability(2727. Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Nag Chowdhuri R, Smith G, Chintu N, Ngo TD. The evaluation of the Woman's Condom marketing approach: what value did peer-led interpersonal communication add to the promotion of a new female condom in urban Lusaka? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225832.) and fidelity of the intervention.(2828. Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.) The selection of only 15 studies showed the little production of randomized clinical trials using the peer support strategy in PHC in recent years.

Most of the included studies had gaps in the field of implementation science, such as the lack of reporting of the theoretical frameworks used.(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.,1515. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.,1919. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.,2222. Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.,2828. Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.) Furthermore, the lack of statistical significance in the results related to the health outcomes analyzed can be attributed, in part, to the limited consideration of crucial aspects of implementation, such as sustainability, fidelity, reach and appropriateness.(1414. Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.) These results can also be explained by the lack of understanding of the determinants and mechanisms that act as obstacles and facilitators in implementing peer support.

The positive findings described can support the implementation of the strategy within the scope of Brazilian PHC, as the national scientific production reporting the use of peer support by health professionals in the country is scarce. Based on the results of the studies in this review,(1515. Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.,1616. Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.,1919. Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.,2121. Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.,2626. Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.) it would be possible to strengthen the successful policy to combat STIs(3535. Miranda AE, Freitas FL, de Passos MR, Lopez MA, Pereira GF. Políticas públicas em infecções sexualmente transmissíveis no Brasil. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021;30(Spe 1):30.) and combat chronic non-communicable diseases.(3636. Placideli N, Castanheira ER, Dias A, Silva PA, Carrapato JL, Sanine PR, et al. Evaluation of comprehensive care for older adults in primary care services. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:06.) As shown, this can be achieved with nursing involvement in collaborative practices with the entire family health team.(3737. Pereira JG, Oliveira MA. Autonomia da enfermeira na Atenção Primária: das práticas colaborativas à prática avançada. Acta Paul Enferm. 2018;31(6):627-35.)

The gap in knowledge of theoretical frameworks and interventions in implementation science can interfere with the analysis of outcomes, often presenting underestimated results or lacking important data for further clarification on certain interventions. Retrieving only clinical studies may have limited the exploration of other themes in which peer support is being used. However, it was possible to assess the performance of the intervention compared to groups without intervention, or compared with the intervention that was usually carried out. Despite its relevance and acceptance by the population, significant knowledge gaps still persist, especially regarding the application of theoretical implementation frameworks, the analysis of their public health outcomes and how to assess the fidelity of these interventions.

In this context, new studies could deepen the understanding of how such strategies are implemented, which theoretical frameworks support these practices and, mainly, what is the real impact achieved through peer support.

Conclusion

The peer support strategy has been used in some PHC settings with the mapping that covers areas such as mental health, STIs and chronic non-communicable diseases. Positive health impacts included HIV viral suppression in puerperal women who adopted the intervention, significant reduction in systolic blood pressure, and a decrease in the amount of alcohol consumed in the intervention groups. However, there is still a lack of studies to analyze the effectiveness in other PHC scenarios, especially regarding fidelity, feasibility, sustainability, appropriateness and cost.

Acknowledgements

The study was partially financed by the Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS).

Referências

  • 1
    Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139.
  • 2
    Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):21.
  • 3
    Penney D. Defining 'Peer Support': Implications for Policy, Practice, and Research. Advocates for Human Potential. 2018;30(3):1-11.
  • 4
    Garn SD, Glümer C, Villadsen SF, Malling GM, Christensen U. Understanding the mechanisms generating outcomes in a Danish peer support intervention for socially vulnerable people with type 2-diabetes: a realist evaluation. Arch Public Health. 2021;79(1):160.
  • 5
    Lorthios-Guilledroit A, Richard L, Filiatrault J. Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: a scoping review. Eval Program Plann. 2018;68:19-33. Review.
  • 6
    Majjouti K, Küppers L, Thielmann A, Redaélli M, Vitinius F, Funke C, et al. Family doctors' attitudes toward peer support programs for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease: an exploratory survey among German practitioners. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):220.
  • 7
    Ramos FS, Bittencourt DD, Camargo SP, Schmidt C. Intervenção mediada por pares no engajamento acadêmico de alunos com autismo. Rev Bras Educ Espec. 2021;27:e0261.
  • 8
    Prat Vigué G, Cano Prieto I, Del Río Sáez R, Vilanova Masana R, Simó Algado S. Training peer support workers in mental health care: a mixed methods study in central Catalonia. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:791724.
  • 9
    Topping KJ. Peer Education and peer counselling for health and well-being: a review of reviews. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(10):6064. Review.
  • 10
    Mayer MK, Urlaub DM, Guzman-Corrales LM, Kowitt SD, Shea CM, Fisher EB. "They're doing something that actually no one else can do": a qualitative study of peer support and primary care integration. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38 Suppl 1:S1.
  • 11
    Kent M. Developing a Strategy to Embed Peer Support into Mental Health Systems. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(3):271-6.
  • 12
    Peters MD, Godfrey CM, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers' manual 2015: methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Adelaide: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015.
  • 13
    Medeiros HP, Teixeira E. Metodologia da pesquisa para a enfermagem e saúde: resenha de livro. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(5):1000-1.
  • 14
    Gillard S, Bremner S, Patel A, Goldsmith L, Marks J, Foster R, et al. Peer support for discharge from hospital mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a randomized, parallel, two-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9(2):125-36.
  • 15
    Abuogi LL, Onono M, Odeny TA, Owuor K, Helova A, Hampanda K, et al. Effects of behavioural interventions on postpartum retention and adherence among women with HIV on lifelong ART: the results of a cluster randomized trial in Kenya (the MOTIVATE trial). J Int AIDS Soc. 2022;25(1):e25852.
  • 16
    Kerrigan D, Mbwambo J, Likindikoki S, Davis W, Mantsios A, Beckham SW, et al. Project Shikamana: Community Empowerment-Based Combination HIV Prevention Significantly Impacts HIV Incidence and Care Continuum Outcomes Among Female Sex Workers in Iringa, Tanzania. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(2):141-8.
  • 17
    Mavhu W, Willis N, Mufuka J, Bernays S, Tshuma M, Mangenah C, et al. Effect of a differentiated service delivery model on virological failure in adolescents with HIV in Zimbabwe (Zvandiri): a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e264-75.
  • 18
    Sam-Agudu NA, Ramadhani HO, Isah C, Erekaha S, Fan-Osuala C, Anaba U, et al. The impact of structured mentor mother programs on presentation for early infant diagnosis testing in rural north-central nigeria: a prospective paired cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;75(Suppl 2):S182-9.
  • 19
    Suseela RP, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, K Vasudevan B, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.
  • 20
    Aziz Z, Riddell MA, Absetz P, Brand M, Oldenburg B; Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Project Investigators. Peer support to improve diabetes care: an implementation evaluation of the Australasian Peers for Progress Diabetes Program. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):262.
  • 21
    Thankappan KR, Sathish T, Tapp RJ, Shaw JE, Lotfaliany M, Wolfe R, et al. A peer-support lifestyle intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes in India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial of the kerala diabetes prevention program. PLoS Med. 2018;15(6):e1002575.
  • 22
    Sharma S, Mehra D, Akhtar F, Mehra S. Evaluation of a community-based intervention for health and economic empowerment of marginalized women in India. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1766.
  • 23
    Puchalski Ritchie LM, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Kip EC, Straus SE, Kawonga H, et al. Impact of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention versus usual care on treatment completion rates: results of a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):107.
  • 24
    Puchalski Ritchie LM, Kip EC, Mundeva H, van Lettow M, Makwakwa A, Straus SE, et al. Process evaluation of an implementation strategy to support uptake of a tuberculosis treatment adherence intervention to improve TB care and outcomes in Malawi. BMJ Open. 2021;11(7):e048499.
  • 25
    Magidson JF, Joska JA, Belus JM, Andersen LS, Regenauer KS, Rose AL, et al. Project Khanya: results from a pilot randomized type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of a peer-delivered behavioural intervention for ART adherence and substance use in HIV care in South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021;24(Suppl 2):e25720.
  • 26
    Aziz Z, Mathews E, Absetz P, Sathish T, Oldroyd J, Balachandran S, et al. A group-based lifestyle intervention for diabetes prevention in low- and middle-income country: implementation evaluation of the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):97.
  • 27
    Pinchoff J, Boyer CB, Nag Chowdhuri R, Smith G, Chintu N, Ngo TD. The evaluation of the Woman's Condom marketing approach: what value did peer-led interpersonal communication add to the promotion of a new female condom in urban Lusaka? PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0225832.
  • 28
    Corder K, Sharp SJ, Jong ST, Foubister C, Brown HE, Wells EK, Armitage SM, Croxson CH, et al. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the GoActive intervention to increase physical activity among UK adolescents: a cluster randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003210.
  • 29
    P Suseela R, Ambika RB, Mohandas S, Menon JC, Numpelil M, Vasudevan BK, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based education and peer support led by women's self-help groups in improving the control of hypertension in urban slums of Kerala, India: a cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial. BMJ Glob Health. 2022;7(11):e010296.
  • 30
    Cordeiro L, Baldini Soares C. Revisão de escopo: potencialidades para a síntese de metodologias utilizadas em pesquisa primária qualitativa. Bol Inst Saúde. 2020;20(2):37-43. Review.
  • 31
    Ho KH, Yang C, Leung AK, Bressington D, Chien WT, Cheng Q, et al. Peer Support and Mental Health of Migrant Domestic Workers: A Scoping Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7617. Review.
  • 32
    Han S, Zhang Y, Yang X, Chai X, Guo J, Zhang L, et al. The effectiveness and sustainability of peer support interventions for persons living with HIV: a realist synthesis. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(2):e010966.
  • 33
    Øgård-Repål A, Berg RC, Fossum M. Peer support for people living with HIV: a scoping review. Health Promot Pract. 2023;24(1):172-90. Review.
  • 34
    Lioi FM, Sousa LR, Elias HC, Gerin L, Gir E, Reis RK. Tratamento como prevenção na perspectiva de pessoas vivendo com HIV/aids. Acta Paul Enferm. 2023;36:eAPE012323.
  • 35
    Miranda AE, Freitas FL, de Passos MR, Lopez MA, Pereira GF. Políticas públicas em infecções sexualmente transmissíveis no Brasil. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2021;30(Spe 1):30.
  • 36
    Placideli N, Castanheira ER, Dias A, Silva PA, Carrapato JL, Sanine PR, et al. Evaluation of comprehensive care for older adults in primary care services. Rev Saude Publica. 2020;54:06.
  • 37
    Pereira JG, Oliveira MA. Autonomia da enfermeira na Atenção Primária: das práticas colaborativas à prática avançada. Acta Paul Enferm. 2018;31(6):627-35.

Edited by

Associate Editor (Peer review process): Thiago da Silva Domingos. (https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-7468). Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    24 June 2024
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    30 Oct 2022
  • Accepted
    20 Dec 2023
Escola Paulista de Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Paulo R. Napoleão de Barros, 754, 04024-002 São Paulo - SP/Brasil, Tel./Fax: (55 11) 5576 4430 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: actapaulista@unifesp.br