Inflammation: friend or foe of bovine reproduction?

Abstract

Inflammation is not only the first line of defense of the organism but is also required in many reproductive processes such as ovulation, corpus luteum development, luteolysis, uterine clearance after insemination and post partum. Nevertheless, if excessive or persistent, inflammation can switch from a positive mechanism to a deleterious process, impairing oocyte quality and embryo development. Not only uterine but also non genital inflammatory sites can depreciate reproductive performances, with a carry over effect of 2 to 4 months. Since the metabolic challenges of the peripartum transition period make difficult for the cow to control inflammation, dairy cows are frequently in a pro-inflammatory stage, suggesting that inflammation, rather than infection, is a limiting factor of fertility in modern dairy cows. Within the first week after calving, cows have to mount an intense inflammatory response to the bacterial invasion of the uterine cavity with the challenge of being able to switch it off in no more than 5-6 weeks. The absence of neutrophils on endometrial smear is associated with the highest success rate at insemination. Since a fine tuning – rather than an absence - of inflammation is required along the reproductive cycle, anti-inflammatory drugs do not allow any improvement of pregnancy rate, except in the specific case of embryo transfer. Appropriate management of the transition period (especially nutritional) and in a long term perspective, genetic selection contribute to improve the aptitude of cows to controls the intensity of inflammatory process.

Keywords:
inflammation; ovulation; post partum; cytokines; neutrophils

Introduction

(Bacterial) infection has been long considered as an essential component of reproductive disorders, whereas (sterile) inflammation is nowadays identified as a major and frequent limiting factor of reproductive performances. In the medical approach, inflammation, hallmark of “–itis” diseases, is classically considered as a deleterious process, an unwanted response leading to immune dysfunction, diversion of nutrients from productive purposes, tissue damage, sepsis, organ failure and even death. Nevertheless, from a biological perspective, inflammation, involving chemokines and cytokines release, blood vessel dilation and immune cell infiltration, is the first line immune response of an organism facing a microbial infection or a tissue injury. Since the female genital tract is physiologically exposed to a range of tissue injuries (such as ovulation) and intrauterine bacterial challenges (after calving, at insemination/mating through sperm), inflammation also belongs to the physiology of reproduction. Moreover, some other reproductive processes, such as corpus luteum development and demise, or maternal recognition of pregnancy share some similarities with inflammatory events. The objective of this paper is to review the positive and negative relationships between inflammation and cow reproduction, to finally question the rationale of the use of anti-inflammatory drugs to improve reproductive performances. This review focuses on inflammation, trying to distinguish it from the effects of bacterial infections (including Lipopolysaccharide - LPS) and on the bovine female, despite inflammation is closely associated to many physiological and pathological aspects of reproduction in many other species, if not all (e.g. Freeman et al., 2013 in the bitch or Katila, 2012 in the mare).

The female genital tract is physiologically able to mount an inflammatory reaction

The female genital tract is naturally equipped to recognize pathogens and damages (Sheldon et al., 2018): some uterine, tubal and ovarian cells of the cow express receptors (Pattern recognition receptors, PRRs, sensors of ‘danger’) recognizing highly conserved microbial molecular signatures (MAMPs, Microbe-associated molecular patterns) or host-derived molecules indicative of cell injury (DNA fragments, mitochondrial content, but also free fatty acids and carbohydrates), referred to as DAMPs (for Damage-associated molecular patterns). Transmembrane toll-like receptors (TLRs) are probably the most classical PRRs and are expressed by bovine granulosa cells (Price and Sheldon, 2013), bovine oviductal epithelial cells, epithelial and stromal cells of the endometrium (Herath et al., 2009; Turner et al., 2014; Dadarwal et al., 2017; Danesh Mesgaran et al., 2018).

These different compartments are able to mount an early immune response: recognition of MAMPs or DAMPs by the genital cells initiate several signaling cascades (through NFκB or MAPkinase pathways for example), resulting in the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. Tumor Necrosis Factor α -TNFα-, interleukin- IL 1 and 8), antimicrobial peptides and anti-apoptotic factors. Immune cells (mainly polymorphonuclear cells - PMN) are consequently attracted to the site of infection/injury, ensuring phagocytosis of invading microorganisms or cell fragments (Broom and Kogut 2018; Sheldon et al., 2019) together with the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the release of proteolytic enzymes. Pro-inflammatory cytokines also induce important microcirculatory events, at short (vasodilation) and long term (neoangiogenesis contributing to tissue healing).

Physiological inflammation in reproductive processes

Apart from playing a central role into innate immunity, inflammation is essential for successful cow reproduction since inflammatory (or inflammatory-like) processes are implicated in every step of fertility: in the cycle (ovulation, corpus luteum development, luteolysis), early pregnancy (maternal recognition of pregnancy) and later, in expulsion of fetal membranes and post partum uterine involution.

Ovulation

The ovulation exhibits many classical signs of local inflammation, with production of inflammatory mediators, locally increased blood flow, leukocyte infiltration, swelling, tissue digestion and ultimately tissue repair (Espey, 1980; Duffy et al., 2019). First responders to the LH surge are granulosa and theca cells, which produce chemokines and cytokines within hours after the LH surge. High concentrations of TNFα, IL1 and IL8 are found in follicular fluid at the preovulatory stage; consequently, not only the preovulatory follicle is invaded by high numbers of neutrophils and macrophages, but ovarian resident immune cells are activated (Jiemtaweeboon et al., 2011). Through proteolytic pathways, crucial within the ovulation process, these exogenous and endogenous cells regulate the reorganization of follicular stroma, the disruption of the granulosa basal lamina, and its invasion by vascular endothelial cells. LH-induced mediators also initiate cumulus expansion and cumulus-oocyte-complex detachment, together with extensive extracellular matrix remodeling and loss of the surface epithelium at the follicular apex. All these inflammatory phenomenons play a crucial role in the ovulatory process since treatment with antibodies directed against IL8 or neutrophils respectively suppress or decrease ovulation rate; administration of anti-proteases blocks ovulation; no blood flow increase is observed around large follicles that will finally fail to ovulate (Murdoch et al., 1997; Miyamoto et al., 2006).

Corpus luteum development

After ovulation, the remainder of the follicle undergoes intra-antral bleeding, colonization by a large variety of immune cells (mainly macrophages, neutrophils and eosinophils), secreting numerous cytokines (TNFα, interferon gamma, interleukins, prostaglandins) together with angiogenic factors. Follicular wall is rapidly remodeled, thanks to rapid angiogenesis and granulosa/thecal cells differentiation into luteal tissue, that finally fills the former follicular antral cavity. If ovulation can be assimilated to a specific physiological injury, corpus luteum (CL) development can be compared to a phase of tissue repair and organ healing.

Luteolysis

Not only CL formation but also lysis are inflammatory-like processes. Due to the short delay between prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) secretion and the intraluteal immune reaction, luteolysis is even considered as an acute phenomenon (Shirasuna et al., 2012a). Leukocytes, especially eosinophils, macrophages and T lymphocytes, are recruited into the CL within the 5 first minutes after a PGF2α injection; as early as after 30 minutes, the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase is stimulated, accompanied by an increase in luteal blood flow and IL8 expression (Neuvians et al., 2004). Luteal blood flow increases within minutes in response to each peak of uterine PGF2α during spontaneous luteolysis in cattle (Miyamoto et al., 2005; Ginther and Beg, 2012). Interestingly, this “preluteolytic” blood flow increase is not observed in PGF2alpha refractory CL (Miyamoto et al., 2006). A little bit later, but as early as two hours, expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL1beta and interferon gamma) is increased and made responsible for apoptosis of luteal cells. CL regresses primarily through the loss of cells by apoptosis and apoptotic luteal cells are phagocytosed by macrophages. The large number of immune cells observed within the CL 6-24 hours after PGF2α are considered essential for a rapid demise of the CL tissue (Neuvians et al. 2004; Shirasuna et al., 2012b). As previously described, TNFα is also found involved into CL development: this dual effect may be due to a dose-effect, luteotropic at high doses or luteolytic at low doses, probably depending on the type of receptors activated (TNFRI or II) (Korzekwa et al., 2008). Four hours after PGF2α release, blood flow has felt back to the preluteolytic level and totally disappears after 24 hours (Miyamoto et al., 2005).

After insemination/mating: post-mating reaction

Spermatozoa, seminal plasma or extenders are recognized as “dangers” by the genital tract and can induce an inflammatory reaction though PRRs activation. Mating or artificial insemination (AI) are thus followed by a physiological influx of neutrophils into the uterine lumen which peaks between 1 and 12 hours after. This so called post mating reaction has been observed in the uterus, cervix and vagina but not into the oviduct (despite less well studied and probably more complex). Like bacteria, sperm are phagocyted by neutrophils either directly through cell-cell attachment or entrapped with neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) which ensnare sperm and hinder their motility (Marey et al., 2016). Rapid removal of sperm is thought to prevent acquired immune responses against sperm in dams since it is important for further embryo development that the female genital tract remains tolerant to paternal antigens (Katila 2012). In cattle, 60% of sperm are voided by 6 hours after AI and by 12-24 hours, only a few percent of sperm are left in the reproductive tract, the majority found within the vagina (Mitchell et al., 1985; Hawk, 1987). The duration of PMN infiltration is short, with a peak at less than 2 hours or at around 8-16 hours post AI or mating in cattle according to the different studies (reviewed by Katila, 2012): sperm and bacteria are rapidly eliminated, afterward the endometrium rapidly returns to a non-inflamed status, prepared to receive the embryo after its oviductal transit. If one can easily conceive than an excessive or persistent post mating response could decrease embryo survival rate, Kaufmann et al. (2009) suggested that the absence of post mating reaction in cows (no leukocytes intrauterine mobilization 4 hours after insemination) is associated with decreased pregnancy rates.

The situation is different in the oviduct whose epithelial cells face two opposite challenges: first, the protection against bacteria ascending from the uterus (and especially in oestrus, due to the opening of the cervical barrier and eventually insemination) and second, to favor fertilization and embryo development, whereas sperm and embryos are (semi) allogeneic to the maternal host. Interestingly, in presence of LH and estradiol, the oviduct generates a state of immunotolerance that ensures sperm survival until fertilization (Marey et al., 2016). Once sperm bound to oviductal epithelial cells, these cells are stimulated to secrete high levels of PGE2 that strongly suppress the PMN phagocytic activity to sperm and pro-inflammatory cytokines synthesis. Sperm binding thus favors the development of an anti-inflammatory immune environment and suppresses PMN sperm phagocytosis. More precisely, follicular fluid collected from pre-ovulatory follicle enhanced sperm phagocytosis by neutrophils in vitro whereas the oviductal fluid suppressed this activity. The oviductal environment seems thus to minimize the inflammatory effect of the follicular fluid released at the time of ovulation to allow sperm capacitation and fertilization (Yousef et al., 2019).

Placental expulsion

Placental maturation leading to fetal membranes expulsion also involves inflammatory mechanisms, mainly protease activity and leukocytes chemotaxis (Beagley et al., 2010). During the third trimester of pregnancy, fetal major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class 1 molecules begin to be expressed by placental cells and initiate a maternal response (the fetus being an allograft) (Davies et al., 2000). Leukocytes are recruited through the placenta via several chemoattracting cytokines (TNFα, IL2 and IL 8) and phagocyte placental cells (Heuwieser and Grunert, 1987; Kimura et al, 2002). In addition, Matrix MetalloProteinase and collagenase activities increase in the maternal and the fetal part of the placenta (Maj and Kankhofer, 1997; Beagley et al., 2010). Both inflammatory components (leukocytes and enzymes) contribute to the loosening and subsequently the detachment of the villi. Importance of efficient inflammatory processes into placental expulsion in the cow is well demonstrated by the overexpression of anti-inflammatory associated genes and decreased expression of promoters of proteolytic activity in case of spontaneous placental retention (Nelli et al., 2019) even if not systematically reported (Walter and Boos, 2001).

Post partum uterine involution

Following the delivery of the calf, the uterine lumen, fulfilled with cellular and tissular debris, from placental and maternal origin, is physiologically colonized by bacteria (Sheldon et al., 2006). Both damages and bacterial invasion elicit a massive immediate cellular influx, whose intensity affects reproductive performances. Cows able to mount an early inflammatory response with more than 35-40% of neutrophils on endometrial smears 7 days after calving have shorter intervals from calving to pregnancy (Gilbert and Santos 2016; Cheong et al., 2017). This may be attributable to an early clearance of the uterine cavity from inflammatory stimuli. Inflammation is thus beneficial for the animal in the very early times after calving. However, it is important to distinguish local intrauterine cell mobilization - associated with a higher probability of ovulation from the first dominant follicle - and systemic inflammation, evaluated through haptoglobin concentration, conversely associated with a decreased ovulation rate (Cheong et al., 2017).

Excessive or persistent uterine inflammation

Once the initial danger of post-partum microbial invasion is contained, it is important that inflammation is resolved, otherwise chronic inflammation persists to the detriment of tissue function. Optimal reproductive performances thus require that the animal is able to mount a rapid, acute inflammatory response to control in a short term delay the microbial invasion. In a second step, after pathogen clearance, it is of equal importance that the animal is able to control the inflammation itself, to extinct it through a timely transition to an anti-inflammatory state, favorable to tissue repair processes. Rapid, targeted, effective and quick resolution are the hallmarks of a desired inflammatory response (Broom and Kogut 2018). Considering uterine health, after the intense PMN mobilization of the first week after calving, optimal reproductive performances are obtained if the percentage of PMN on endometrial smears falls below 5% between 21 and 35 days after calving, reaching a nadir (0-1%) around 45 days after calving and being maintained at this almost null level until the time of insemination (Deguillaume, 2010; Drillich et al., 2012; Bogado Pascottini et al., 2016; Machado Pfeifer et al., 2018; Fig. 1).

Figure 1
Intensity of endometrial inflammation from calving to insemination (% neutrophils on endometrial smear). All the thresholds indicated were determined based on a significant decrease of pregnancy rate. After an early intense mobilization of neutrophils after calving (>40%), inflammation is down regulated, becoming null around 40-45 days after calving and remaining null at the time of insemination. Between the nadir and the time of insemination, inflammation can be reactivated (interrupted lines). During a few hours after insemination, inflammation is transiently reactivated (post mating response).

But this fine tuning of uterine inflammation (massive during the first week after calving, rapidly controlled and finally extinct at the end of the first month and transiently reactivated during a few hours after insemination) is a difficult exercise for dairy cows, due to the delicate metabolic context of the post partum period (LeBlanc, 2014). Inflammation control is not just a passive extinction but rather requires the activation of anti-inflammatory pathways (including for example lipoxins and resolvins, Sheldon et al., 2017). Genital health relies on a fragile equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory systems, difficult to maintain in dairy cows: the persistence of uterine inflammation at the time of insemination is a frequent situation (28 to 57% of Holstein cows according to the different studies). From three weeks before and until three weeks after calving (transition period), dairy cows are facing a negative energy balance (with production of non esterified fatty acids), oxidative stress (ROS production), together with digestive acidosis and social stress (Fig. 2), all situations that put the cow in a pro-inflammatory situation. Moreover, a vicious circle installs due to the huge energy expenditure associated to the inflammatory phenomenon itself. Dairy cows use more than 1 kg glucose in the first 12 hours after an LPS challenge (Kvidera et al., 2017), an expenditure corresponding to about 100 kcal/kg BW^0.75 (calculation from Gilbert, 2019), i.e. almost equivalent to maintenance. The depletion of the key cellular nutrients (such as glucose) reduces inflammatory responses, compromising the ability of animals to respond sufficiently to pathogens, resulting in the persistence of infections and chronic inflammation.

Figure 2
Determinants of the pro-inflammatory status during the post partum period of dairy cows. NEFA: Non Esterified Fatty Acids.

The tendency to an overactivity of pro-inflammatory systems and the instability of inflammation control in post partum dairy cows are pictured in endometrial smears follow-up: even when cows solved their uterine inflammation at 40-45 days post partum (0% PMN), transient episodes of reactivation of the uterine inflammation (up to 40% PMN) were observed after 60 days post partum (unpublished data). This explains why cows diagnosed as free from endometritis around 30 days post partum can be found with purulent uterine content at the time of insemination, probably due to a disruption of the equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory systems.

To date, the unability of cows to down regulate inflammation is probably one important limiting factor of modern dairy cows fertility, due to the frequency of excessive uterine inflammation at the time of insemination, and its dramatic impact on insemination success rate (around 15 points decrease). As developed by Sheldon et al. (2019), uterine health is rather dependent on the endometrial tolerance to pathogens (ability to limit the disease severity induced by pathogens) than on its resistance (ability to limit the pathogen development).

Deleterious effects of inflammation on reproduction

Excessive or persistent inflammation has deleterious impact on fertility. But this applies not only to uterine inflammation, but also to extragenital inflammation. Due to cytokine release into the general circulation, ovaries, uterus and embryos may be somewhat “contaminated” by distant inflammatory sites, such as mastitis, podal inflammation, digestive inflammation consecutive to acidosis, all highly prevalent in dairy cows. Inflammatory diseases affect many steps of the reproductive process: GnRH and LH synthesis, folliculogenesis, follicular steroidogenesis, oocyte quality, ovulation, estrus expression, corpus luteum quality and lifespan, fertilization, embryo development and survival (Ribeiro and Carvalho, 2017; Fig. 3).

Figure 3
Steps of the reproductive process sensitive to inflammation.

Ovarian reserve

In humans and mouse, chronic inflammation is made responsible for destruction and/or premature activation of primordial follicles, leading to a decrease of the ovarian reserve, and thus Premature Ovarian Failure (phenomenon so called “inflamm-aging”) (Huang et al., 2019). In the bovine, considering the post partum period as a prolonged period of inflammation with excessive oxidative stress and fatty acids release, Gilbert (2019) estimated plausible that inflammatory damages could be inflicted on developing oocytes and the resting oocyte pool, resulting in chronically diminished fertility (Sheldon et al., 2017).

Anovulation – Follicular cyst

Several anovulatory situations are associated with an increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the granulosa (IL1α, IL6 and TNF α) in humans (Luteinized unruptured follicle syndrom; Polycystic ovary syndrom) and in the cow (ovulation failure and follicular persistence, follicular cyst; Baravalle et al., 2015; Stassi et al., 2017).

Oocyte competence

Inflammation mediates changes in follicular fluid that diminish the ability of the oocyte to complete meiosis, undergo fertilization and support development of a conceptus. By the activation of granulosa PRRs, steroidogenesis and the interaction between oocyte and cumulus can be impaired (Herath et al., 2007). Inflammatory mediators have been also described to result into aberrant spindle formation and meiosis abnormalities (Bromfield and Sheldon, 2011; Banerjee et al., 2012).

Luteal insufficiency

Since inflammation affects granulosa and thecal cell function (before ovulation) and luteal cells (after ovulation), it is associated with inadequate function of the CL and insufficient circulating concentrations of progesterone, one of the major causes of infertility of modern cows (Diskin et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2016).

Embryo/placental development

Inflammation may affect embryo survival both by its deleterious effect on oocyte quality and CL function but also by providing an inadequate uterine microenvironment and through direct effect of cytokines on embryonic/placental cells. The direct influence of inflammation per se on embryo has been elegantly demonstrated by Hill and Gilbert (2008) who induced a non infectious endometrial inflammation; after culture into the conditioned uterine medium, blastocyst cell number was decreased, affecting trophectoderm but not inner cell mass. Other authors observed consistently impaired elongation and decreased interferon tau secretion. Inflammation thus interferes with maternal recognition of pregnancy and later, if pregnancy is maintained, decreases placental weight from Day 42 of gestation (Lucy et al., 2016; Ribeiro et al., 2016). Interestingly, maternal inflammatory diseases even caused inflammation-like changes in the transcriptome of conceptus cells (Ribeiro et al., 2016).

Inflammation is thus involved into many reproductive diseases, namely abnormalities in ovarian resumption of cyclicity (delayed ovulation, short luteal phases, persistent corpus luteum), metritis/endometritis and repeat breeder syndrome.

Carry over effects of inflammation

The variety of targets sensitive to inflammation (oocyte, embryo, placenta) explains that inflammation affects reproductive performances at various distances from insemination. For example, mastitis negatively impacts on reproductive performances whatever it occurred before the first AI (even during the first month after calving), between first AI and conception or after conception, with a period at higher risk extending from 3 weeks before AI until 30 days after (Loeffler et al., 1999; Perrin et al., 2007; Lavon et al., 2011; Albaaj et al., 2017). Same observation was made with long lasting consequences of metritis on ovarian function, long after the resolution of the disease (Piersanti et al., 2019). This delayed effect of inflammation is reminiscent of what is known as the “Britt hypothesis” explaining the carry-over effect of negative energy balance on fertility (Britt, 1992). The carryover effect of inflammatory diseases on reproduction is attributable to the impact on oocyte quality together with an durably modified uterine environment. In case of uterine disease, inflammation can persist during several months as inflammatory lymphocytic foci within the endometrial wall, even during pregnancy (Lucy et al., 2016). The uterus may also be long-lasting impaired secondary to altered steroid synthesis. When previously diseased cows (retained fetal membranes, metritis, mastitis, lameness, and respiratory and digestive problems) are used as embryo recipients, establishment of diagnosed pregnancy is reduced and pregnancy loss rate is increased relative to that of previously healthy cows. The effect of inflammation on reproduction extends long beyond the resolution of the disease, until 4 months later (Ribeiro et al., 2016).

Transgenerational (epigenetic) effects of maternal inflammation are also suspected but with controversial observations. For Ribeiro and Carvalho (2017), female calves born from multidiseased cows have significantly lower incidence of mortality and morbidity before their first calving. Conversely, Ling et al. (2018) described that calves born to cows with a higher serum haptoglobin concentration (acute phase protein) during late gestation showed a lower TNFα plasma concentration after challenge, suggesting a compromised immune response to microbials.

Suppression of inflammation: NSAID and reproduction

Since inflammation (rather than infection) is now recognized as the limiting factor of reproductive performances and in the context of the reduction of the use of antibiotics, the interest of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) has been evaluated. When used as additional treatment, NSAID allowed to limit the reproductive impact of mastitis (MacDougall et al., 2016). Their administration at the time of AI did not improve pregnancy rates (Heuwieser et al., 2011); administration before ovulation was deleterious due to an inhibition of the ovulation process and follicular cyst formation (Pugliesi et al., 2012). Conversely, administration at the time of embryo transfer showed an improvement of pregnancy rates (+10 to 25 points), especially when transfer was qualified as difficult (Aguiar et al., 2013) or after transfer of low quality embryos (Scenna et al., 2005). Administration at mid luteal phase targeting maternal recognition of pregnancy did not show any significant improvement of insemination success rate.

Conclusion: Inflammation is not to be suppressed but regulated

Inflammation is a dual process, together mandatory at numerous steps of the reproduction process and deleterious for reproductive performances if excessive or persistent. Optimisation of insemination success rate depends not on the suppression of inflammation but on its fine regulation. The cow has to be able to mount intense inflammatory episodes and, more difficult, to control and shut them down rapidly, what is made complex by metabolic challenges post partum. Better regulation of the inflammation can be obtained through an appropriate dietary management during the transition period, targeting energy balance, Dietary Anions-Cations Difference, and anti oxidant reserves (LeBlanc 2012). Immunomodulators rather than anti-inflammatory drugs are an elegant strategy (such as pegbovigrastim, long acting-analog of bovine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Ruiz et al., 2017; Heiser et al., 2018). The genetic option is also promising, with the selection of females with high immune regulatory competences (Thompson-Crispy et al., 2012; Silva Silveira et al., 2019; König and May, 2019).

References

• Aguiar TS, Araujo CV, Tirloni RR, Martins LR. 2013. Effect of meloxicam on pregnancy rate of recipient heifers following transfer of in vitro produced embryos. Reprod Domest Anim, 48:984-988.
• Albaaj A, Foucras G, Raboisson D. 2017. High somatic cell counts and changes in milk fat and protein contents around insemination are negatively associated with conception in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 88:18-27.
• Banerjee J, Sharma R, Agarwal A, Maitra D, Diamond MP, Abu-Soud HM. 2012. IL-6 and mouse oocyte spindle. PLoS One, 7(4):e35535.
• Baravalle ME, Stassi AF, Velazquez MML, Belotti EM, Rodriguez FM, Ortega HH, Salvetti NR. 2015. Altered expression of proinflammatoru cytokines in ovarian follicles of cows with cystic ovarian disease. J Comp Pathol, 153:116-130.
• Beagley JC, Whitman KJ, Baptiste KE, Scherzer J. 2010. Physiology and Treatment of Retained Fetal Membranes in Cattle. J Vet Intern Med, 24:261-268.
• Bogado Pascottini O, Hostens M, Sys P, Vercauteren P, Opsomer G. 2016. Cytological endometritis at artificial insemination in dairy cows: Prevalence and effect on pregnancy outcome. J Dairy Sci, 100:588-597.
• Britt JH. 1992. Impacts of early postpartum metabolism on follicular development and fertility. The Bovine Proceedings, 24:39-43.
• Bromfield JJ, Sheldon IM. 2011. Lipopolysaccharide initiates inflammation in bovine granulosa cells via the TLR4 pathway and perturbs oocyte meiotic progression in vitro. Endocrinology, 152(12):5029-40.
• Broom LJ, Kogut MH. 2018. Inflammation: friend or foe for animal production? Poult Sci, 97:510-514.
• Cheong SH, Sa Filho OG, Absalon-Medina VA, Schneider A. Butler WR, Gilbert RO. 2017. Uterine and systemic inflammation influences ovarian and follicular function in postpartum dairy cows. PLos One, 12(5): e0177356.
• Dadarwal D, Palmer C, Griebel P. 2017. Mucosal immunity of the postpartum bovine genital tract. Theriogenology, 104:62-71.
• Danesh Mesgaran S, Gartner MA, Wagener K, Drillich M, Ehling-Schulz M, Einspanier R, Gabler C. 2018. Different inflammatory responses of bovine oviductal epithelial cells in vitro to bacterial species with distinct pathogenicity characteristics and passage number. Theriogenology, 106:237-246.
• Davies CJ, Fisher PJ, Schlafer DH. 2000. Temporal and regional regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I expression at the bovine uterine/placental interface. Placenta, 21:194-202.
• Deguillaume L. 2010. L’inflammation génitale post partum de la vache. PhD dissertation. AgroParisTech, Paris, France.
• Diskin MG, Parr MH, Morris DG. 2011. Embryo death in cattle: an update. Reprod Fertil Dev, 24:244-251.
• Drillich M, Tesfaye D, Rings F, Schellander K, Heuwieser W, Hoelker M. 2012. Effects of polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration into the endometrial environment on embryonic development in superovulated cows. Theriogenology, 77:570-578.
• Duffy DM, Ko CM, Jo M, Brannstrom M, Curry Jr TE. 2019. Ovulation: parallels with inflammatory processes. Endocr Rev, 40:369-416.
• Espey LL. 1980. Ovulation as an inflammatory reaction - a hypothesis. Biol Reprod, 22:73-106
• Freeman SL, Green MJ, England GCW. 2013. Uterine fluid from bitches with mating-induced endometritis reduces the attachment of spermatozoa to the uterine epithelium. Vet J, 198:76-80.
• Gilbert RO, Santos NR. 2016. Dynamics of postpartum endometrial cytology and bacteriology and their relationship to fertility in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 85:1367-74.
• Gilbert RO. 2019. Mechanisms of disruption of fertility by infectious diseases of the reproductive tract. J Dairy Sci, 102:3754-3765.
• Ginther OJ, Beg MA. 2012. The hour of transition into luteolysis in horses and cattle: A species comparison. Theriogenology, 77:1731-1740.
• Hawk HW. 1987. Transport and fate of spermatozoa after insemination of cattle. J Dairy Sci, 70:1487-1503.
• Heiser A, LeBlanc SJ, McDougall S. 2018. Pegbovigrastim treatment affects gene expression in neutrophils of pasture-fed, periparturient cows. J Dairy Sci, 101:1-14.
• Herath S, Williams EJ, Lilly ST, Gilbert RO, Dobson H, Bryant CE, Sheldon IM. 2007. Ovarian follicular cells have innate immune capabilities that modulate their endocrine function. Reproduction, 134:683-693.
• Herath S, Lilly ST, Santos NR, Gilbert RO, Goetze L, Bryant CE, White JO, Cronin J, Sheldon IM. 2009. Expression of genes associated with immunity in the endometrium of cattle with disparate postpartum uterine disease and fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 7:55.
• Heuwieser W, Iwersen M, Goetze L. 2011. Efficacy of carprofen on conception rates in lactating dairy cows after subcutaneous or intrauterine administration at the time of breeding. J Dairy Sci, 94:146-151.
• Heuwieser, W, Grunert, E. 1987. Significance of chemotactic activity for placental expulsion in cattle. Theriogenology, 27: 907- 912.
• Hill J, Gilbert R. 2008. Reduced quality of bovine embryos cultured in media conditioned by exposure to an inflamed endometrium. Aust Vet J, 86:312-316.
• Huang Y, Chuan H, Haifeng Y, Ruichen L, Xinxin F, Xiaoyan L, Jian H, Weiyun C, Yuehui Z. 2019. Inflamm-Aging: a new mechanism affecting premature ovarian insufficiency. J Immunol Res, 1-7.
• Jiemtaweeboon S, Shirasuna K, Nitta A, Kobayashi A, Schuberth HJ, Shimizu T, Miyamoto A. 2011. Evidence that polymorphonuclear neutrophils infiltrate into the developing corpus luteum and promote angiogenesis with interleukin-8 in the cow. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 9:79.
• Katila T. 2012. Post mating inflammatory responses of the uterus. Reprod Domest Anim, 47(Suppl 5), 31-41.
• Kaufmann TB, Drillich M, Tenhagen BA, Forderung D, Heuwieser W. 2009. Prevalence of bovine subclinical endometritis 4h after insemination and its effects on first service conception rate. Theriogenology, 71:385-91.
• Kimura K, Goff JP, Kehrli ME, Reinhardt TA. 2002. Decreased neutrophil function as a cause of retained placenta in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 85: 544- 550.
• König S, May K. 2019. Phenotyping strategies and quantitative-genetic background of resistance, tolerance and resilience associated traits in dairy cattle. Animal, 13:897-908.
• Korzekwa A, Murakami S, Wocławek-Potocka I, Bah MM, Okuda K, Skarzynski DJ. 2008. The influence of TNFalpha on the secretory function of bovine corpus luteum; TNF and its receptor expression during the estrous cycle. Reprod Biol, 8:245-262.
• Kvidera SK, Horst EA, Abuajamieh M, Mayorga EJ, Fernandez MV, Baumgard LH. 2017. Glucose requirements of an activated immune system in lactating Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci, 100(3):2360-2374.
• Lavon Y, Ezra E, Leitner G, Wolfenson D. 2011. Association of conception rate with pattern and level of somatic cell count elevation relative to time of insemination in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 94:4538-4535.
• LeBlanc SJ. 2012. Interactions of Metabolism, Inflammation, and Reproductive Tract Health in the Postpartum Period in Dairy Cattle. Reprod Domest Anim, 47:18-30.
• LeBlanc SJ. 2014. Reproductive tract inflammatory disease in postpartum dairy cows. Animal, 8(s1):54-63
• Ling T, Hernandez-Jover M, Sordillo LM, Abuelo A. 2018. Maternal late-gestation metabolic stress is associated with changes in immune and metabolic responses of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci, 101:6568-6580.
• Loeffler SH, de Vries MJ, Schukken YH. 1999. The effects of time of disease occurrence, milk yield, and body condition on fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 82:2589-2604.
• Lucy MC, Evans TJ, Pock SE. 2016. Lymphocytic foci in the endometrium of pregnant dairy cows: characterization and association with reduced placental weight and embryonic loss. Theriogenology, 86:1711-1719.
• Machado Pfeifer LF, de Souza Andrade J, Moreira EM, Reis da Silva R, Araújo Neves PM, Moreira da Silva G, Lemos IC, Schneider A. 2018 Uterine inflammation and fertility of beef cows subjected to timed AI at different days post partum. Anim Reprod Sci,197:268-277.
• Maj JG, Kankofer M. 1997. Activity of 72‐kDa and 92‐kDa matrix metalloproteinases in placental tissues of cows with and without retained fetal membranes. Placenta, 18: 683- 687.
• Marey MA, Yousef MS, Kowsar R, Hambruch N. 2016. Local immune system in oviduct physiology and pathophysiology: attack or tolerance? Domest Anim Endocrinol, 56:S205-S211.
• McDougall S, Abbeloos E, Piepers S, Rao AS, Astiz S, Van Verwen T, Statham J, Perez-Villalobos N. 2016. Addition of meloxicam to the treatment of clinical mastitis improves subsequent reproductive performance. J Dairy Sci, 99:1-17.
• Mitchell JR, Senger PL, Rosenberger JL. 1985. Distribution and retention of spermatozoa with acrosomal and nuclear abnormalities in the cow genital tract. J Anim Sci, 61:956-967.
• Miyamoto A, Shirasuna A, Hayashi KG, Kamada D, Kawashima C, Kaneko E, Acosta T, Matsui M. 2006. Potential use of color ultrasound as a tool for reproductive management: new observations using color ultrasound scanning that were not possible with imaging only in black and white. J Reprod Dev, 52:153-160.
• Miyamoto A, Shirasuna K, Wijayagunawardane MP, Watanabe S, Hayashi M, Yamamoto D, Matsui M, Acosta TJ. 2005. Blood flow: a key regulatory component of corpus luteum function in the cow. Domest Anim Endocrinol, 29:329-39.
• Murdoch WJ, Colgin DC, Ellis JA. 1997. Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in the ovulatory mechanism of ewes. J Anim Sci, 75:1601-5.
• Nelli RK, De Koster J, Roberts JN, De Souza J, Lock AL, Raphael W, Agnew D, Contreras GA. 2019. Impact of uterine macrophage phenotype on placental retention in dairy cows. Theriogenology, 127:145e152.
• Neuvians TP, Schams D, Berisha B, Pfaffl MW. 2004. Involvement of proinflammatory cytokines, mediators of inflammation and basic Fibroblast Growth Factor in prostaglandin F2alpha - induced luteolysis in bovine corpus luteum. Biol Reprod, 70:473-480.
• Perrin L, Bostelmann RW, Sheldon IM. 2007. Reduced conception rates associated with bovine mastitis during a «window of opportunity». Vet Rec,161:61-62.
• Piersanti RL, Horlock AD, Block J, Santos JEP, Sheldon IM, Bromfield JJ. 2019 Persistent effects on bovine granulosa cell transcriptome after resolution of uterine disease. Reproduction, pii: REP-19-0037.R1.
• Price JC, Sheldon IM. 2013. Granulosa cells from emerged antral follicles of the bovine ovary initiate inflammation in response to bacterial pathogen-associated molecular patterns via Toll-like receptor pathways. Biol Reprod, 89(5):119.
• Pugliesi G, Khan F.A., Hannan M.A., Beg M.A., Carvalho G.R., Ginther OJ. 2012. Inhibition of prostaglandin biosynthesis during postluteolysis and effects on CL regression, prolactin, and ovulation in heifers. Theriogenology, 78: 443-454.
• Ribeiro ES, Carvalho MR. 2017. Impact and mechanisms of inflammatory diseases on embryonic development and fertility in cattle. Anim Reprod, 14:589-600.
• Ribeiro ES, Gomes G Greco LF, Cerri RLA, Vieira-Neto A, Monteiro PLJ Jr, Lima FS, Bisinotto RS, Thatcher WW, Santos JEP. 2016. Carryover effect of postpartum inflammatory diseases on developmental biology and fertility in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 99:2201-2220.
• Ruiz R, Tedeschi LO, Sepúlveda A. 2017. Investigation of the effect of pegbovigrastim on some periparturient immune disorders and performance in Mexican dairy herds. J Dairy Sci, 100:1-13.
• Scenna FN, Hockett ME, Towns TM, Saxton AM, Rohrbach NR, Wehrman ME, Schrick FN. 2005. Influence of a prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor administered at embryo transfer on pregnancy rates of recipient cows. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat, 8:38-45
• Sheldon IM, Cronin JG, Bromfield JJ. 2019. Tolerance and innate immunity shape the development of postpartum uterine disease and the impact of endometritis in dairy cattle. Annu Rev Anim Biosci, 7:361-384.
• Sheldon IM, Cronin JG, Pospiech M, Turner ML. 2018. Mechansisms linking metabolic stress with innate immunity in the endometrium. J Dairy Sci 101:3655-3664.
• Sheldon IM, Lewis GS, LeBlanc S. Gilbert RO. 2006. Defining post-partum uterine disease in cattle. Theriogenology, 65:1516-1530.
• Sheldon IM, Owens SE, Turner ML. 2017. Innate immunity and the sensing of infection, damage and danger in the female genital tract. J Reprod Immunol 119:67-73.
• Shirasuna K, Jiemtaweeboon S, Raddatz S, Nitta A, Schuberth HJ, Bollwein H, Shimizu T, Miyamoto A. 2012a. Rapid accumulation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils in the corpus luteum during prostaglandin F2alpha-induced luteolysis in the cow. PlosOne, 7: e29054.
• Shirasuna K, Nitta A, Sineenard J, Shimizu T, Bollwein H, Miyamoto A. 2012b. Vascular and immune regulation of corpus luteum development, maintenance and regression in the cow. Domest Anim Endocrinol, 43:198-211.
• Silva Silveira PA, Butler WR, LaCount SE, Overton TR, Castilho Barros C, Schneider A. 2019. Polymorphisms in the anti-oxidant paraoxonase-1 (PON1) gene associated with fertility of post partum dairy cows. Theriogenology, 125:302-309.
• Stassi AF, Baravalle ME, Belotti EM, Rey F, Gareis NC, Díaz PU, Rodríguez FM, Leiva CJ, Ortega HH, Salvetti NR. 2017. Altered expression of cytokines IL-1alpha, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFalpha in bovine follicular persistence. Theriogenology, 97:104-112.
• Thompson-Crispi KA, Hine B, Quinton M, Miglior F, Mallard BA. 2012. Short communication: association of disease incidence and adaptive immune response in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 95:3888-3893.
• Turner ML, Cronin JG, Healey GD, Sheldon IM. 2014. Epithelial and stromal cells of bovine endometrium have roles in innate immunity and initiate inflammatory responses to bacterial lipopeptides in vitro via Toll-like receptors TLR2, TLR1, and TLR6. Endocrinology, 155(4):1453-65.
• Walter I, Boos A. 2001. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor-2 of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP-2) in the placenta and interplacental uterine wall in normal cows and in cattle with retention of fetal membranes. Placenta, 22(5):473-83.
• Yousef MS, Abd-Elhafeez HH, Talukder AK, Miyamoto A. 2019. Ovulatory follicular fluid induces sperm phagocytosis by neutrophils, but oviductal fluid around oestrus suppresses its inflammatory effect in the buffalo oviduct in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev, 86(7):835-846.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  28 Nov 2019
• Date of issue
  Jul-Sep 2019

History

• Received
  09 May 2019
• Accepted
  30 July 2019