asagr
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
Acta Sci., Agron.
1807-8621
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM
O objetivo deste trabalho foi selecionar famílias com desempenho superior e ampla
variabilidade genética para cruzamentos dialelos e com potencial utilização no
pré-melhoramento de dendê. O experimento consistiu em 42 famílias de irmãos
completos, divididas em três ensaios com 16 famílias e 3 testemunhas comuns, sendo
estes em delineamento em blocos ao acaso com quatro blocos, e 12 plantas por bloco.
As características avaliadas no experimento foram número de cachos por planta (NCP),
produção de cachos por planta (PCP) e peso médio de cacho (PMC). Com estimação dos
componentes de variância verificou-se que existe uma maior variância genética dentro
de famílias do que entre famílias. A herdabilidade para todas as características
foram altas, acima de 0,75 e o coeficiente de variação ambiental encontrado para
todas as características foi de baixo a moderado (entre 4 e 13). As famílias foram
separadas em sete grupos pelo método de Tocher e em seis grupos com o método UPGMA.
Visando a utilização das melhores famílias em cruzamentos dialelos, as famílias 15,
14, 22, 21, 28, 37, 33 e 39 foram selecionadas com base na performance individual,
através do teste de Scott-Knott, e diversidade genética através do agrupamento.
Introduction
Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) is native to Africa and has been considered a prospective
feedstock for biodiesel production (PLEANJAI; GHEEWALA,
2009). This tree is largely produced in the world's tropical zone (YUSOF; CHEN, 2003) and could supply two large
industrial sectors: the food industry and the oleochemical industry.
Oil palm cultivation is an important industrial and agro-ecological activity that has
been commercially exploited for approximately 25 years. Oil palm is cultivated for
mesocarp-derived crude palm oil (CPO) and palm ernel-derived palm
kernel oil (PKO). CPO and PKO may be used alone or in blends with other oils in food and
other applications. Furthermore, palm oil is an optimal source of energy and a clean,
renewable biofuel (BAKOUMÉ et al., 2010).
Commercial production can begin three year after planting but the maximum yield capacity
of the plants is realized after seven years when the plant enters the productive phase.
The oil palm breeding program is relatively new compared to other industrial species,
such as coffee and coconut (CEDILLO et al., 2008).
Oil palm plantations have been continuously expanding since the first commercial
plantations were introduced in 1969 in Malaysia (TAN et
al., 2009).
The oil palm breeding program has focused on oil production (COCHARD et al., 2005; SILALERTRUKSA
et al., 2012). Oil production is correlated with the oil content of the bunch
as well as the number of bunches produced. The number of bunches is influenced by many
factors, including the proportion of female flowers in relation to the total number of
flowers, the fraction of aborted inflorescences and defects in mesocarp formation, and
environmental factors, such as soil, humidity and temperature (KALLARACKAL et al., 2004; HENSON;
HARUN, 2005).
One strategy that can be used in the oil palm breeding program is family selection.
Selection of families at the initial stage, before clones are obtained, may reduce the
time spent developing a new cultivar (BARBOSA et al.,
2005). The progenies or families are units that can be selected according to
their average phenotypic values. A family is chosen primarily when the selected trait
presents low heritability because they are greatly affected by the environment (PEDROSO et al., 2011).
Several authors have shown that the use of family selection can contribute to parental
selection and to crosses aimed at obtaining improved populations in several cultures
(ANDRADE et al., 2011; FERREIRA et al., 2010; ARNHOLD et al.,
2009). However, little work on family selection in the initial generation in a
breeding program has been reported in the palm oil literature (BAKOUMÉ et al., 2010; CEDILLO et al.,
2008; SOH et al., 2003). Thus, the
objective of this study was to select families as potential parents for oil palm
breeding programs aimed at obtaining higher genotypes to be used for establishing
cultivars.
Material and methods
Conduction of the experiment
The experiment consists of the first trial competitions of oil palm interspecific
hybrids in an area in Brazil in which fatal yellowing occurs. The experiment was
performed in 2007 in an area with incidences of fatal yellowing (FY) in Marborges
Agroindústria S.A., located in Moju, state of Pará. The treatments consisted of 42
interspecific hybrids of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis x
Elaeis
oleifera), of which 41 hybrids from E. oleifera
originated from Manicoré and one from Coari. The pre-germinated hybrid seeds
were supplied by Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental from an experimental area in Rio Urubu,
located in Rio Preto da Eva in the state of Amazonas.
The experiment was composed of three trials in a completely random block design, with
16 treatments and 4 replicates each. Of the 16 treatments, three shared a common
control with the three trials (progenies 40, 41 and 42) (Table 1). The treatments consisted of full-sib families. The
experimental plot was composed of 12 plants spaced 9 m apart in a triangular
arrangement, with 7.8 m between lines. The experimental stand had 2,302 plants.
Practices of management, fertilization, control of pests and diseases, and harvest
were conducted according to company procedures, which used a production system
similar to that for African oil palm with few nutritional adjustments and the use of
assisted pollination throughout the productive period. Evaluations of bunch weight
per plant (BWP) have been conducted since 2010, and a patrol is performed every 20
days to harvest the heavy, ripened bunches. The number of bunches per plant (NBP) are
also recorded to obtain the bunch average weight per plant (BAW). All plants were
harvested but the evaluation was carried out only for the six plants central
considered in this study.
Table1:
Progeny characterization with their respective parents.
Progeny
Parents
Trial
Progeny
Parents
Trial
1
RU 2839 D x RU 56 P
1
22
RU 2901 D x RU 2693 P
2
2
RU 78 D x RU 53 P
1
23
RU 1588 D x RU 2730 P
2
3
RU 2846 D x RU 2692 P
1
24
RU 101 D x RU 2710 P
2
4
RU 92 D x RU 56 P
1
25
RU 1578 D x RU 2710 P
2
5
RU 3079 D x RU 2749 P
1
26
RU 2845 D x RU 2729 P
2
6
RU 3101 D x RU 56 P
1
27
RU 3795 D x RU 2749 P
3
7
RU 3189 D x RU 2710 P
1
28
RU 2841 D x RU 2692 P
3
8
RU 3856 D x RU 2691 P
1
29
RU 2842 D x RU 2730 P
3
9
RU 1605 D x RU 2730 P
1
30
RU 2842 D x RU 2707 P
3
10
RU 1578 D x RU 2691 P
1
31
RU 3099 D x RU 2693 P
3
11
RU 1578 D x RU 2692 P
1
32
RU 3089 D x RU 2730 P
3
12
RU 1586 D x RU 2730 P
1
33
RU 3089 D x RU 2710 P
3
13
RU 92 D x RU 2692 P
1
34
RU 1608 D x RU 2749 P
3
14
RU 2787 D x RU 2733 P
2
35
RU 1778 D x RU 2698 P
3
15
RU 3308 D x RU 2691 P
2
36
RU 3170 D x RU 2710 P
3
16
RU 3111 D x RU 2693 P
2
37
RU 3123 D x RU 2700 P
3
17
RU 3111 D x RU 2700 P
2
38
RU 3169 D x RU 2700 P
3
18
RU 2914 D x RU 2700 P
2
39
RU 2905 D x RU 2693 P
3
19
RU 3359 D x RU 2700 P
2
40
RU 3791 D x RU 2692 P
1. 2 .3
20
RU 1578 D x RU 2730 P
2
41
RU 1604 D x RU 56 P
1. 2 .3
21
RU 2900 D x RU 2693 P
2
42
RU 1724 D x RU 2710 P
1. 2 .3
Statistical analysis
To test the hypothesis of significant genetic variation among the means of
full-sibling families, each characteristic was analyzed for variance using the Genes
software (CRUZ, 2006) with data from
individuals within the plots. Random block design was used according to the following
statistical model:
Yijk = µ + Gi + Lk + B/Ljk +
Tl + LTkl + TG/Llik + Eijkl,
where i = 1, 2, ... g families; j = 1, 2, ... b blocks; l = 1,2, ... T witness; and k
= 1, 2, ... nij plants per plot. Yijk is the observation in the
kth plant, in the ith family of the jth block; μ
is the population overall mean; Gi is the effect of the genotype i;
Lk is the effect of the trial k; B/Lj is the effect of the
block j within trial k; Tl is the effect of the witness l; LTkl
is the effect of the interaction trial x witness; and Eijkl is the
experimental error; and δijk is the variation effect among plants within
families, where δijk ∼ NID (0, s2
fd).
The components of variance for each trait were estimated according to Gelman (2005), in which variances of the following
were estimated: block variances; phenotypic variance among the means of families,
within families and among plants in the experiment; environmental variance among
plots; and genotypic variance among the means of families, within families or among
plants within families and additive genetic variance.
Heritability coefficients for individual plants within families in the block, in the
experiment and for the means of families were all estimated according to Gelman (2005), as were the phenotypic, genetic,
environmental and experimental variation coefficients.
The Scott-Knott test was used at 5% probability to form groups between progenies and
Pearson's correlation was calculated among traits and to determine the contribution
of traits to genetic diversity.
Cluster analysis
Cluster analysis was performed to optimize the selection of families for diallel
cross. Estimates of the family genotypic values obtained for each trait under study
(NBP, BWP and BAW) were considered to be variables in the cluster process.
The Tocher cluster method and the average linkage hierarchical method, also known as
the unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA), were used for
family clustering (JOHNSON; WICHERN,
2007).
The Tocher method is based on a matrix of dissimilarity where the average
dissimilarity of the group must be less than the average distances between other
groups. The distance among the individual k and the group formed by individuals ij is
given by:
d(ij)k= djk + dik.
The inclusion or exclusion of k at group θ assumed that the mean increase promoted by
inclusion of k in a predetermined group is less than θ, where:
if d(group)k/n < θ, k must be included in the group, or
if d(group)k/n > θ, k must be excluded from the group,
where n is the number of individuals in the original group.
In the UPGMA method, the dendogram is constructed based upon the individual with the
greatest similarity and by the distance from individual k to the cluster formed by
the individuals i and j. This is given by the following:
that is, the set of means of the distance between pairs of individuals.
The optimum number of clusters (partition) for the hierarchical cluster method used
in this study was obtained using the method proposed by Mojema (1977), in which the number of clusters is given by the
first stage in the dendogram. Here,
αj > ǡ + Saθ,
where j=1,2, ..., n; αj is the distance for joint stage corresponding to
n-j+1 clusters; ǡ and Sa are the mean and standard deviation,
respectively; and θ is a constant. The value of θ in this study was set at 1.25
according to the suggestion of Milligan and Cooper
(1985).
Results and discussion
In the analysis of variance, the variation in source of treatments was found to be
significant (Table 2). This shows the existence
of genetic variability in the population and that the selection is effective in
generating selection gains.
Table 2:
Joint analyses of variance of the traits NBP (number of bunches per plant).
BWP (bunch weight per plant), BAW (bunch average weight).
SV
DF
MS
F
NBP
BWP
BAW
NBP
BWP
BAW
Block
9
14,35
480,83
6,21
Experiment
2
75,79
3239,09
18,81
4,56*
7,43**
4,82**
Control
2
16,33
392,83
1,39
0,96
0,9
0,36
C x Exp
4
22,29
661,78
4,78
1,34
1,52
1,23
G/EXP
36
31,07
1450,97
8,29
1,87**
3,33**
2,13**
(CxG)/T
3
54,80
1238,76
19,18
3,3*
2,84*
4,92**
Residue
135
14,60
435,58
3,9
Total
191
*and** significance level of 5 and 1%, respectively. C - control, Exp -
experiment, G - genotype, T - trial.
Genetic variance (σ2) within families was greater than among families for all
traits evaluated (Table 3). This indicates that
selection within families may be better than selection among families due to the greater
variability within families. The block effect and the environmental effect among plots
tended to zero for NBP and BAW; thus, the experimental precision was high, and the block
effect was small (ROSADO et al., 2009).
Table 3:
Variance estimates for bunch weight per plant (BWP). number of
bunches per plant (NBP), and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Trial
Variance
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
σ2
gm
1.59
100.44
0.6
σ2
gd
4.77
301.33
1.81
σ2
fd
9.55
440.11
1.33
σ2
ft
11.88
575.7
2.05
σ2
b
0.16
4.13
0.02
σ2
e
0.58
31
0.1
2
σ2
gm
3.93
228.48
0.63
σ2
gd
11.78
685.44
1.91
σ2
fd
13.68
371.99
1.45
σ2
ft
18.55
646.38
2.13
σ2
b
0.24
4.77
0
σ2
e
0.69
41.15
0.04
3
σ2
gm
2.41
58.49
0.56
σ2
gd
7.24
175.48
1.69
σ2
fd
10.93
455.45
1.48
σ2
ft
14.01
559.48
2.27
σ2
b
0.06
3.47
0.02
σ2
e
0.73
49.01
0.21
(
1)σ2
gm, genotypic variance among family means; σ2
gd, genotypic variance within the family; σ2
fd, phenotypic variance within families; σ2
ft, total phenotypic variance; σ2
b, phenotypic variance due to the block effect; and σ
2
e, environmental variance among plots.
Heritability among and within families varied for all traits (Table 4). Heritability was high (0.75, 0.83 and 0.86 for NBP, BWP and
BAW, respectively), showing that there is high genetic control for those traits.
Selection among families is more advantageous for NBP; although σ2 is greater within
families, heritability is higher among families. In other words, the environmental
effect is lower and the genetic gain is greater among families (Table 5). However, heritability for BWP and BAW was greater within
families than among families. Overall, heritability among families was higher than
within families, as shown in Martins et al.
(2005) and Paula et al. (2002). As a consequence, we can select among and within
families to exploit variability and increase total genetic gain (ROSADO et al., 2009).
Table 4:
Estimates of heritability coefficients for bunch weight per plant (BWP),
number of bunches per plant (NBP) and average bunch weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Trial
Heritability coefficient(1)
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
h2
m
0.81
0.85
0.91
h2
d
0.5
0.68
0.95
h2
ex
0.53
0.7
0.9
h2
b
0.54
0.7
0.92
2
h2
m
0.89
0.92
0.94
h2
d
0.86
0.98
0.99
h2
ex
0.85
0.95
0.97
h2
b
0.86
0.96
0.96
3
h2
m
0.85
0.72
0.87
h2
d
0.66
0.38
0.99
h2
ex
0.69
0.42
0.98
h2
b
0.69
0.42
0.99
Joint
h2
m
0.47
0.7
0.53
(1)h2m
, heritability coefficient of family means; h2
d, heritability coefficient within families; h2
ex, heritability coefficient of the experimental plants;
h2
b heritability coefficient of plants in the block.
Table 5:
Estimated selection gain (GS) for number of bunches per plant (NBP), bunch
weight per plant (BWP), bunch average weight (BAW) and families selected with a
selection intensity of 11.90%.
Selection
SG
Total SG
Selected families
NBP
BWP
BAW
NBP1
1.44
19.42
0.55
21.41
15, 5, 14, 19, 12
BWP
1.31
22.3
0.75
24.36
15, 5, 14, 21, 13
BAW
0.8
13.13
1.02
14.95
21, 15, 20, 22, 14
*Columns represent selected traits, and rows represent selection gain for
each trait when only the column trait is selected.
A significant genetic variability (p < 0.001) was found in the joint analysis of the
evaluated traits. As such, this population was able to be used for the selection and
recombining of genetic material aimed at obtaining a new generation consisting of the
greatest number of favorable alleles for certain traits. The results of the joint
analysis showed that selection among families is important for bunch weight per plant
because there is a high variability among them; this may generate a high selection gain.
Because heritability is high, the selection is efficient on those traits with high
heritability because the environmental effect upon this expression is small. To perform
cluster analysis, the control used must not interact with the different set trials. This
criterion was checked, and the three controls used in the study did not show significant
interaction with the trials; therefore, they were useful in this analysis and did not
affect the results.
Another parameter used to compare genetic variability among families was the coefficient
of variation. When CVg/CVe approaches 1, selection gain is higher.
CVg/CVe was greater than 1 for all traits in all trials in this
work (Table 6). As a consequence, we concluded
that genetic gain will be high for all variables. Thus, genetic gain can be achieved
over several selection cycles.
CVgd was higher than CVgm for all evaluated traits except for BAP
in trial 3. Thus, selection within and among families is expected to promote greater
advances when compared to selection among families (ROSADO et al., 2009).
Table 6:
Estimates of the coefficients of variation for bunch weight per plant
(BWP), number of bunches per plant (NBP) and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil
palm full-sib families.
Trial
CV (%)
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
CVgm
10.84
16.07
14.4
CVgd
18.78
27.83
24.94
CVex
10.16
13.29
8.51
CVe
6.54
8.93
5.76
CVgm/CVe
1.65
1.79
2.5
CVgd/CVe
2.86
3.11
4.33
2
CVgm
19.48
31.7
17.23
CVgd
33.74
54.9
29.84
CVex
13.63
18.1
8.96
CVe
8.19
13.45
4.44
CVgm/CVe
2.37
2.36
3.88
CVgd/CVe
4.12
4.08
6.72
3
CVgm
15.52
15
14.79
CVgd
26.88
25.98
25.62
CVex
13.01
18.54
11.49
CVe
8.51
13.73
9
CVgm/CVe
1.82
1.09
1.64
CVgd/CVe
3.16
1.89
2.84
Joint
CVg
17.87
29.12
20.80
CV, coefficient of variation; CVgm, genetic coefficient of variance among
families; CVgd, genetic coefficient of variance within family; CVex,
phenotypic coefficient of variance among plants in the experiment; CVe,
environmental coefficient of variance; CVgm/ CVe e CVgd/CVe, relationship
between the genetic coefficient of variance within and among families and
the environmental coefficient of variance.
After ANOVA analysis, in which families were considered random effects, found the
existence of genetic variability for all target traits and the possibility of gain with
selection, the effect of fixed treatments was considered to identify the best families
to constitute the new generation from crosses in the palm oil breeding program. Thus,
the Scott-Knott test was performed (p < 0.05), and significant differences were found
among families.
Families 5 and 15 were those which presented the highest mean values for all traits. For
NBP, families 14 and 19 can be selected for use in pre-breeding programs. Families 22
and 23 can be selected for bunch average weight. The Scott-Knott test formed 2 groups
for NBP and 3 groups for BWP and BAW. Using the Scott-Knott test, the controls (families
40, 41 and 42) were significantly inferior to the best families for the traits
evaluated. This shows that the experimental families presented many alleles which can be
introduced into varieties increase productivity, or they can be crossed among each other
to generate new cultivars with a much higher yield than the current oil palm cultivars.
The Scott-Knott test showed that the best families were 15, 5 14, 19, 22, 21, 28, 4, 37,
13, 3, 2, 11, 1, 36, 41, 9 and 32 for NBP; 5 and 15 for BWP; and 5, 15, 33, 22, 8, 39,
31, 2, 32 and 30 for BAW.
By using the Pearson correlation at 5%, positive correlations of 0.88 among NBP and BWP,
of 0.35 between NBP and BAW, and of 0.72 between BWP and BAW were observed. These
positive correlations are very important for selection because when families with high
NBP are selected, families with higher values for other traits will be selected as a
consequence. The closer the correlation is to one, the easier the selection of those
joint traits is in a given family.
The Tocher's test cluster showed the formation of 7 groups (Table 7). Group 6 is formed by families 5 and 15, which were the best
for the three traits in the Scott-Knott test. If the target of the breeder is to make
converging crosses, the selection of those families is interesting because the
population mean will be high and will generate a high mean in the next generation.
However, a breeding program prioritizing crosses among materials with high means and
presenting genetic diversity among individuals is desirable. Thus, to cross good and
diverging genetic material, materials that complement each other are identified, and the
non-additive fraction present in the genetic variance is utilized.
The UPGMA cluster method formed 6 groups (Figure 1)
that are very similar to those formed by Tocher's cluster method (Table 7). Those groups were set by the local criterion and separated
at a distance of 3.84, as suggested by Mojema
(1977).
The dissimilarity measure (SINGH; SINGH, 1981)
showed that BWP provided 71.26% of the genetic diversity among populations, BAW provided
22.48%, and NBP provided 6.25%. This shows that most genetic diversity among families
results from BWP.
Figure 1:
Dendogram by cluster method: average linkage among clusters
(UPGMA).
Table 7.
Cluster formation by Tocher's method and by UPGMA.
Thus, if those families in a pre-breeding program are to be used to generate
variability, selection has to be performed specifically for BWP because this is the
trait with the greatest genetic variability. Moreover, BWP is the most agronomically
important trait among the three analyzed traits.
Therefore, this study found that there is great diversity in interspecific hybrids;
thus, a very high genetic gain can be expected for this culture with a breeding program.
This work is important for showing that families may be used in pre-breeding programs
aimed at achieving higher germplasm for the evaluated traits. Because the experimental
families were generated from diverging crosses, most of the genes are in heterozygosis.
In an oil palm study, Luyindula et al. (2005)
found that there is a high inbreeding depression rate for the number of bunches per
plant and bunch weight.
Crosses between diverging parents with diverse genetic material are needed for
generating variability in pre-breeding. This will generate a high mean of values in the
progeny, thus facilitating the selection of higher plants.
Crosses among parents of families 15, 14, 22, 21, 28, 37, 33 and 39 could be potential
crosses to generate variability in the next generation. These families could also
provide high means of the traits evaluated in this study because they presented the
highest means in the Scott-Knott test and belong to different groups by cluster
analysis.
An individual with higher values than their parents can be generated in the next
generation from crosses between families of different groups because there is a
combination of alleles controlling each trait.
Following the identification of higher families, diallel crossing is an interesting
method to discover which potential crosses will improve the mean values for all target
traits of the next generation.
Conclusion
Families with great potential for diallel crosses among families 15, 14, 22, 21, 28, 37,
33 and 39 were identified, as cluster analysis grouped these families into different
groups and each have high means as shown by the Scott-Knott test. The existing genetic
variability in the oil palm crop is important for breeding this culture, and the
possibility of gain is high if divergent potential parents are used to provide a high
mean in the next generation.
ANDRADE, J. S. C. O.; OLIVEIRA, F. J.; FILHO, C. J. A.; MELO, L. J. O.
T.; REIS, O. V. Avaliação de progênies em famílias RB na fase inicial do melhoramento
genético em cana-de-açúcar. Revista Brasileira Ciências Agrárias, v. 6, n. 4, p.
609-616, 2011.
ANDRADE
J. S. C. O.
OLIVEIRA
F. J.
FILHO
C. J. A.
MELO
L. J. O. T.
REIS
O. V.
Avaliação de progênies em famílias RB na fase inicial do melhoramento
genético em cana-de-açúcar
Revista Brasileira Ciências Agrárias
6
4
609
616
2011
ARNHOLD, E.; VIANA, J. M. S.; SILVA, R. C.; MORA, F. Eficiências
relativas de métodos de seleção de famílias endogâmicas em milho pipoca. Acta
Scientiarum. Agronomy, v. 31, n. 2, p. 203-207, 2009.
ARNHOLD
E.
VIANA
J. M. S.
SILVA
R. C.
MORA
F.
Eficiências relativas de métodos de seleção de famílias endogâmicas em
milho pipoca
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
31
2
203
207
2009
BAKOUMÉ, C.; GALDIMA, M.; TENGOUA, F. F. Experimental modification of
reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm breeding in Cameroon. Euphytica, v. 171,
n. 2, p. 235-240, 2010.
BAKOUMÉ
C.
GALDIMA
M.
TENGOUA
F. F.
Experimental modification of reciprocal recurrent selection in oil palm
breeding in Cameroon
Euphytica
171
2
235
240
2010
BARBOSA, M. H. P.; RESENDE, M. D. V.; BRESSIANI, J. A.; SILVEIRA, L. C.
I.; PETERNELLI, L. A. Selection of sugarcane families and parents by REML/BLUP. Crop
Breeding and Applied Biotechonology, v. 5, n. 3, p. 443-450, 2005.
BARBOSA
M. H. P.
RESENDE
M. D. V.
BRESSIANI
J. A.
SILVEIRA
L. C. I.
PETERNELLI
L. A.
Selection of sugarcane families and parents by
REML/BLUP
Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechonology
5
3
443
450
2005
CEDILLO, D. S. O.; FERREIRA, M. D.; BARROS, W. S.; CRUZ, C. D.; DIAS, L.
A. S.; ROCHA, R. B. Selection among and within and combined selection in oil palm
families derived from Dura x Dura. Ciência Rural, v. 38, n. 1, p. 65-71,
2008.
CEDILLO
D. S. O.
FERREIRA
M. D.
BARROS
W. S.
CRUZ
C. D.
DIAS
L. A. S.
ROCHA
R. B.
Selection among and within and combined selection in oil palm families
derived from Dura x Dura
Ciência Rural
38
1
65
71
2008
COCHARD, B.; AMBLARD, P.; DURAND-GASSELIN, T. Oil palm genetic
improvement and sustainable development. OCL, v. 12, n. 2, p. 141-147,
2005.
COCHARD
B.
AMBLARD
P.
DURAND-GASSELIN
T.
Oil palm genetic improvement and sustainable
development
OCL
12
2
141
147
2005
CRUZ, C. D. Programa GENES: biometria. Viçosa: UFV, 2006.
CRUZ
C. D.
Programa GENES: biometria
Viçosa
UFV
2006
FERREIRA, M. D.; NEVES, L. G.; BRUCKNER, C. H.; VIANA, A. P.;; CRUZ, C.
D. BARELLLI, M. A. A. Formação de supercaracteres para seleção de famílias de
maracujazeiro amarelo., Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy v. 32, n. 2, p. 247-254,
2010.
FERREIRA
M. D.
NEVES
L. G.
BRUCKNER
C. H.
VIANA
A. P.
CRUZ
C. D.
BARELLLI
M. A. A.
Formação de supercaracteres para seleção de famílias de maracujazeiro
amarelo
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy
32
2
247
254
2010
GELMAN, A. Analysis of Variance - Why it is More Important than Ever.
The Annals of Statistics, v. 33, n.1, p. 1-53, 2005.
GELMAN
A.
Analysis of Variance - Why it is More Important than
Ever
The Annals of Statistics
33
1
1
53
2005
HENSON, I. E.; HARUN, M. H. The influence of climatic conditions on gas
and energy exchanges above a young oil palm stand in north Kedah, Malaysia. Journal
of oil palm Research, v. 17, n. 4, p. 73-91, 2005.
HENSON
I. E.
HARUN
M. H.
The influence of climatic conditions on gas and energy exchanges above
a young oil palm stand in north Kedah, Malaysia
Journal of oil palm Research
17
4
73
91
2005
JOHNSON, R. A.; WICHERN, D. W. Applied Multivariate Statistical
Analysis. 6th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
JOHNSON
R. A.
WICHERN
D. W.
Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
6th ed.
New Jersey
Pearson Prentice Hall
2007
KALLARACKAL, J.; JEYAKUMAR, P.; GEORGE, S. J. Water use of irrigated oil
palm at three different arid locations in peninsular India. Journal of Oil Palm
Research, v. 16, n.1, p. 45-53. 2004.
KALLARACKAL
J.
JEYAKUMAR
P.
GEORGE
S. J.
Water use of irrigated oil palm at three different arid locations in
peninsular India
Journal of Oil Palm Research
16
1
45
53
2004
LUYINDULA, N.; MANTANTU, N.; DUMORTIER, F.; CORLEY, R. H. V. Effects of
inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm. Euphytica, v. 143, n.1-2, p. 9-17,
2005.
LUYINDULA
N.
MANTANTU
N.
DUMORTIER
F.
CORLEY
R. H. V.
Effects of inbreeding on growth and yield of oil palm
Euphytica
143
1-2
9
17
2005
MARTINS, I. S.;; CRUZ, C. D. ROCHA, M. G. B.; REGAZZI, A. J.; PIRES, I.
E. Comparação entre os processos de seleção entre e dentro e o de seleção combinada,
em progênies de Eucalyptus grandis. Cerne, v. 11, n.1, p. 1624,
2005.
MARTINS
I. S.
CRUZ
C. D.
ROCHA
M. G. B.
REGAZZI
A. J.
PIRES
I. E.
Comparação entre os processos de seleção entre e dentro e o de seleção
combinada, em progênies de Eucalyptus grandis
Cerne
11
1
1624
1624
2005
MILLIGAN, G. W.; COOPER, M. C. An Examination of Procedures for
Determining the Number of Clusters in a Data Set. Psychometrika, v. 50, n. 2, p.
159-179, 1985.
MILLIGAN
G. W.
COOPER
M. C.
An Examination of Procedures for Determining the Number of Clusters in
a Data Set
Psychometrika
50
2
159
179
1985
MOJEMA, R. Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An
evaluation. The Computer Journal, v. 20, n. 4, p. 359-363, 1977.
MOJEMA
R.
Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An
evaluation
The Computer Journal
20
4
359
363
1977
PAULA, R. C.;; PIRES, I. E. BORGES, R. C. G.; CRUZ, C. D.Predição de
ganhos genéticos em melhoramento florestal. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 37,
n. 2, p. 159165, 2002.
PAULA
R. C.
PIRES
I. E.
BORGES
R. C. G.
CRUZ
C. D.
Predição de ganhos genéticos em melhoramento florestal
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
37
2
159165
159165
2002
PEDROSO, C. A.;; BARBOSA, M. H. P. SILVA, F. L.;; RESENDE, M. D. V.
PETERNELLI, L. A.Repeatability of full-sib sugarcane families across harvests and the
efficiency of early selection., Euphytica v. 182, n. 3, p. 423-430,
2011.
PEDROSO
C. A.
BARBOSA
M. H. P.
SILVA
F. L.
RESENDE
M. D. V.
PETERNELLI
L. A.
Repeatability of full-sib sugarcane families across harvests and the
efficiency of early selection
Euphytica
182
3
423
430
2011
PLEANJAI, S.; GHEEWALA, S. H. Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel
production from palmoil in Thailand. Applied Energy, v. 56, n.1, p. S209-S214,
2009.
PLEANJAI
S.
GHEEWALA
S. H.
Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production from palmoil in
Thailand
Applied Energy
56
1
S209
S214
2009
ROSADO, A. M.; ROSADO, T. B.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; BHERING, L. L.;
CRUZ, C. D.Ganhos genéticos preditos por diferentes métodos de seleção em progênies
de Eucalyptus urophylla., Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira v. 44, n. 12, p.
1653-1659, 2009.
ROSADO
A. M.
ROSADO
T. B.
RESENDE
M. F. R.
JUNIOR
BHERING
L. L.
CRUZ
C. D.
Ganhos genéticos preditos por diferentes métodos de seleção em
progênies de Eucalyptus urophylla
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
44
12
1653
1659
2009
SILALERTRUKSA, T.; BONNET, S.; GHEEWALA, S. H.Life cycle costing and
externalities of palm oil biodiesel in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production, v.
28, n. 2, p. 225-232, 2012.
SILALERTRUKSA
T.
BONNET
S.
GHEEWALA
S. H.
Life cycle costing and externalities of palm oil biodiesel in
Thailand
Journal of Cleaner Production
28
2
225
232
2012
SINGH, K. P.; SINGH, R. P. Seasonal variations in biomass and energy of
small roots in a tropical dry deciduous forest, Varanasi, India. Oikos, v. 37, p.
88-92, 1981.
SINGH
K. P.
SINGH
R. P.
Seasonal variations in biomass and energy of small roots in a tropical
dry deciduous forest, Varanasi, India
Oikos
37
88
92
1981
SOH, A. C.; GAN, H. H.; WONG, G.; HOR, T. Y.; TAN, C. C. Estimates of
within family genetic variability for clonal selection in oil palm., Euphytica v.
133, n. 2, p. 147-163, 2003.
SOH
A. C.
GAN
H. H.
WONG
G.
HOR
T. Y.
TAN
C. C.
Estimates of within family genetic variability for clonal selection in
oil palm
Euphytica
133
2
147
163
2003
TAN, K. T.; LEE, K. T.; MOHAMED, A. R.; BHATIA, S. Palm oil: addressing
issues and towards sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,
v. 13, n. 2, p. 420-427, 2009.
TAN
K. T.
LEE
K. T.
MOHAMED
A. R.
BHATIA
S.
Palm oil: addressing issues and towards sustainable
development
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
13
2
420
427
2009
YUSOF, B.; CHEN, K. W. Going back to basics: Producing high oil palm
yields sustainably. Oil Palm Bullet, v. 46, p. 1-14, 2003.
YUSOF
B.
CHEN
K. W.
Going back to basics: Producing high oil palm yields
sustainably
Oil Palm Bullet
46
1
14
2003
Autoria
Leonardo de Azevedo Peixoto **Author for correspondence. E-mail:
leoazevedop@gmail.com
Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Universidade Federal de ViçosaBrazilViçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Leonardo Lopes Bhering
Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Universidade Federal de ViçosaBrazilViçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Universidade Federal de ViçosaBrazilViçosa, Minas Gerais, BrazilUniversidade Federal de Viçosa, Av. Peter Henry
Rolfs, s/n, 37570-000, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Table 3:
Variance estimates for bunch weight per plant (BWP). number of
bunches per plant (NBP), and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Table 4:
Estimates of heritability coefficients for bunch weight per plant (BWP),
number of bunches per plant (NBP) and average bunch weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Table 5:
Estimated selection gain (GS) for number of bunches per plant (NBP), bunch
weight per plant (BWP), bunch average weight (BAW) and families selected with a
selection intensity of 11.90%.
Table 6:
Estimates of the coefficients of variation for bunch weight per plant
(BWP), number of bunches per plant (NBP) and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil
palm full-sib families.
imageFigure 1:
Dendogram by cluster method: average linkage among clusters
(UPGMA).
open_in_new
table_chartTable1:
Progeny characterization with their respective parents.
Progeny
Parents
Trial
Progeny
Parents
Trial
1
RU 2839 D x RU 56 P
1
22
RU 2901 D x RU 2693 P
2
2
RU 78 D x RU 53 P
1
23
RU 1588 D x RU 2730 P
2
3
RU 2846 D x RU 2692 P
1
24
RU 101 D x RU 2710 P
2
4
RU 92 D x RU 56 P
1
25
RU 1578 D x RU 2710 P
2
5
RU 3079 D x RU 2749 P
1
26
RU 2845 D x RU 2729 P
2
6
RU 3101 D x RU 56 P
1
27
RU 3795 D x RU 2749 P
3
7
RU 3189 D x RU 2710 P
1
28
RU 2841 D x RU 2692 P
3
8
RU 3856 D x RU 2691 P
1
29
RU 2842 D x RU 2730 P
3
9
RU 1605 D x RU 2730 P
1
30
RU 2842 D x RU 2707 P
3
10
RU 1578 D x RU 2691 P
1
31
RU 3099 D x RU 2693 P
3
11
RU 1578 D x RU 2692 P
1
32
RU 3089 D x RU 2730 P
3
12
RU 1586 D x RU 2730 P
1
33
RU 3089 D x RU 2710 P
3
13
RU 92 D x RU 2692 P
1
34
RU 1608 D x RU 2749 P
3
14
RU 2787 D x RU 2733 P
2
35
RU 1778 D x RU 2698 P
3
15
RU 3308 D x RU 2691 P
2
36
RU 3170 D x RU 2710 P
3
16
RU 3111 D x RU 2693 P
2
37
RU 3123 D x RU 2700 P
3
17
RU 3111 D x RU 2700 P
2
38
RU 3169 D x RU 2700 P
3
18
RU 2914 D x RU 2700 P
2
39
RU 2905 D x RU 2693 P
3
19
RU 3359 D x RU 2700 P
2
40
RU 3791 D x RU 2692 P
1. 2 .3
20
RU 1578 D x RU 2730 P
2
41
RU 1604 D x RU 56 P
1. 2 .3
21
RU 2900 D x RU 2693 P
2
42
RU 1724 D x RU 2710 P
1. 2 .3
table_chartTable 2:
Joint analyses of variance of the traits NBP (number of bunches per plant).
BWP (bunch weight per plant), BAW (bunch average weight).
SV
DF
MS
F
NBP
BWP
BAW
NBP
BWP
BAW
Block
9
14,35
480,83
6,21
Experiment
2
75,79
3239,09
18,81
4,56*
7,43**
4,82**
Control
2
16,33
392,83
1,39
0,96
0,9
0,36
C x Exp
4
22,29
661,78
4,78
1,34
1,52
1,23
G/EXP
36
31,07
1450,97
8,29
1,87**
3,33**
2,13**
(CxG)/T
3
54,80
1238,76
19,18
3,3*
2,84*
4,92**
Residue
135
14,60
435,58
3,9
Total
191
table_chartTable 3:
Variance estimates for bunch weight per plant (BWP). number of
bunches per plant (NBP), and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Trial
Variance
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
σ2gm
1.59
100.44
0.6
σ2gd
4.77
301.33
1.81
σ2fd
9.55
440.11
1.33
σ2ft
11.88
575.7
2.05
σ2b
0.16
4.13
0.02
σ2e
0.58
31
0.1
2
σ2gm
3.93
228.48
0.63
σ2gd
11.78
685.44
1.91
σ2fd
13.68
371.99
1.45
σ2ft
18.55
646.38
2.13
σ2b
0.24
4.77
0
σ2e
0.69
41.15
0.04
3
σ2gm
2.41
58.49
0.56
σ2gd
7.24
175.48
1.69
σ2fd
10.93
455.45
1.48
σ2ft
14.01
559.48
2.27
σ2b
0.06
3.47
0.02
σ2e
0.73
49.01
0.21
table_chartTable 4:
Estimates of heritability coefficients for bunch weight per plant (BWP),
number of bunches per plant (NBP) and average bunch weight (BAW) in oil palm
full-sibling families.
Trial
Heritability coefficient(1)
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
h2m
0.81
0.85
0.91
h2d
0.5
0.68
0.95
h2ex
0.53
0.7
0.9
h2b
0.54
0.7
0.92
2
h2m
0.89
0.92
0.94
h2d
0.86
0.98
0.99
h2ex
0.85
0.95
0.97
h2b
0.86
0.96
0.96
3
h2m
0.85
0.72
0.87
h2d
0.66
0.38
0.99
h2ex
0.69
0.42
0.98
h2b
0.69
0.42
0.99
Joint
h2m
0.47
0.7
0.53
table_chartTable 5:
Estimated selection gain (GS) for number of bunches per plant (NBP), bunch
weight per plant (BWP), bunch average weight (BAW) and families selected with a
selection intensity of 11.90%.
Selection
SG
Total SG
Selected families
NBP
BWP
BAW
NBP1
1.44
19.42
0.55
21.41
15, 5, 14, 19, 12
BWP
1.31
22.3
0.75
24.36
15, 5, 14, 21, 13
BAW
0.8
13.13
1.02
14.95
21, 15, 20, 22, 14
table_chartTable 6:
Estimates of the coefficients of variation for bunch weight per plant
(BWP), number of bunches per plant (NBP) and bunch average weight (BAW) in oil
palm full-sib families.
Trial
CV (%)
NBP
BWP
BAW
1
CVgm
10.84
16.07
14.4
CVgd
18.78
27.83
24.94
CVex
10.16
13.29
8.51
CVe
6.54
8.93
5.76
CVgm/CVe
1.65
1.79
2.5
CVgd/CVe
2.86
3.11
4.33
2
CVgm
19.48
31.7
17.23
CVgd
33.74
54.9
29.84
CVex
13.63
18.1
8.96
CVe
8.19
13.45
4.44
CVgm/CVe
2.37
2.36
3.88
CVgd/CVe
4.12
4.08
6.72
3
CVgm
15.52
15
14.79
CVgd
26.88
25.98
25.62
CVex
13.01
18.54
11.49
CVe
8.51
13.73
9
CVgm/CVe
1.82
1.09
1.64
CVgd/CVe
3.16
1.89
2.84
Joint
CVg
17.87
29.12
20.80
table_chartTable 7.
Cluster formation by Tocher's method and by UPGMA.
Como citar
Peixoto, Leonardo de Azevedo et al. Seleção de genitores para formação de população de híbridos interespecíficos de dendê. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy [online]. 2015, v. 37, n. 2 [Acessado 8 Abril 2025], pp. 155-161. Disponível em: <https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i2.19145>. Epub Apr-Jun 2015. ISSN 1807-8621. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v37i2.19145.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.