Resumo em Inglês:

Abstract Aspergillus species can colonize and infect immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. Conventional fungal identification depends on microscopic analysis and microorganism medium growth. Other diagnostic methods, non-growth dependent, to invasive fungal infections, are the biomarkers that detect circulating polysaccharides, for example, 1-3-β-d-Glucan and galactomannan. Both are polysaccharides present on the external layer of fungi cell wall and can be detected in clinical samples during the growth of the fungus in the patient. This study aimed to compare the galactomannan detection of Lateral Flow Assay and Enzyme Immunoassay methods in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid. The galactomannan antigen in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid was measured using Enzyme Immunoassay according to the manufacturer's instructions (PLATELIA ASPERGILLUS™ BioRad) and, using a Lateral Flow Assay according to the manufacturer's instructions (Galactomannan LFA IMMY©). The 71 samples were Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid of patients hospitalized at Unicamp Clinical Hospital between 2019 and 2021; of these samples 12/71 (16.9 %) resulted in positive Galactomannan-Lateral Flow Assay. In contrast, Galactomannan-Enzyme Immunoassay resulted as positive in 9/71 (12.6 %) samples, a difference that showed not significant statistically (p-value = 0.36) Comparing both assays’ results identified 8 divergences between them, about 11 % of the total sample. The Sensitivity (73.3 %), Specificity (92.35 %), Positive Predictive Value (62.85 %) and Negative Predictive Value (95.15 %) of Lateral Flow Assay were calculated using the Galactomannan Enzyme Immunoassay as standard. The Lateral Flow Assay demonstrated good results when compared with the Enzyme Immunoassay.

Resumo em Inglês:

Abstract Objective Antibiotic resistance is increasing globally, associated with many failures in pneumonia treatment. This study aimed to evaluate antibiotic use in children treated for outpatient CAP (Community-Acquired Pneumonia). Methods A cross-sectional descriptive retrospective study was conducted, focusing on data from outpatient prescriptions for pneumonia in patients aged 2‒192 months in 2019‒2021. Results All antibiotic prescriptions are considered empiric as no documented bacterial and viral tests exist for children with non-severe CAP. Single antibiotic therapy (66%) had a 2-fold higher rate than combination therapy (34%). Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (50.77%) and azithromycin (30.74%) were the most commonly prescribed in both single and combination therapies, thus determining antibiotic cost (80.15%). Besides, azithromycin (97.92%), cefuroxime (86.26%), and cefpodoxime (60.48%) were prescribed with high adherence to dose guidelines, except for amoxicillin (34.57%). These medicines are prescribed highly compliant (>83%) with dosing interval guidelines. Furthermore, significantly more brand-name antibiotics (56.5%) are prescribed than generic antibiotics (43.5%). In particular, antibiotic class, antibiotic origin, and antibiotic therapies showed significant association with rational antibiotic prescriptions for dose and dose interval (p < 0.05). Conclusions Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is the most frequently prescribed medicine and the most inappropriate due to non-compliance with dose guidelines for CAP treatment. Generic antibiotic use for single therapy should be encouraged based on rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for viruses and bacteria to reduce antibiotic resistance in developing countries. Moreover, the study result has also shown that therapies and antibiotics (class and origin) exhibited significant association with rational prescriptions for CAP treatment for pediatrics.

Resumo em Inglês:

Abstract Combination COVID-19/influenza rapid tests provide a way to quickly and accurately differentiate between the two infections. The goal of this economic evaluation was to assess the cost and health benefits of a combination COVID-19/influenza Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) vs. current standard-of-care in the Brazilian private healthcare setting. A dual decision tree model was developed to estimate the impact of rapid differentiation of COVID-19 and influenza in a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 adults with influenza-like illness in an ambulatory healthcare setting. The model compared the use of a combination COVID-19/influenza RDT to Brazil standard diagnostic practice of a COVID-19 RDT and presumptive influenza diagnosis. Different levels of influenza prevalence were modeled with co-infection estimated as a function of the COVID-19 prevalence. Outcomes included accuracy of diagnosis, antiviral prescriptions and healthcare resource use (hospital bed days and ICU occupancy). Depending on influenza prevalence, considering 1,000 patients with influenza-like illness, a combination RDT compared to standard practice was estimated to result in between 88 and 149 fewer missed diagnoses of influenza (including co-infection), 161 to 185 fewer cases of over-diagnosis of influenza; a 24 to 34% reduction in hospital bed days and a 16 to 26% reduction in ICU days. In the base case scenario (20% influenza, 5% COVID-19), the combination RDT was estimated to result in cohort cost savings of $99. Based upon a de novo economic model, this analysis indicates that use of a combination RDT could positively impact influenza antiviral prescriptions and lower healthcare resource use.

Resumo em Inglês:

Abstract Background Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia may result in Infective Endocarditis (IE). In the pre-antibiotic era, it caused 10 %‒15 % of IE, decreasing to < 3 % after penicillin availability. Although infrequent, it causes aggressive disease. Methods Retrospective analysis of endocarditis databases, prospectively implemented in 4 Brazilian institutions, 2005‒2023. Results From the prospective cohorts comprising 2321 adult patients with IE, we identified 11 (0.47%) with pneumococcal IE. Males represented 7/11 and mean age was 54 years (22‒77). All had native valve involvement; perivalvular abscess was present in 6/11. Only one patient had concurrent meningitis. Beta-lactams were the antibiotics used in 10/11. All had surgical indication, but only 6 had it, as the others were seriously ill. Overall, in hospital mortality was 6/11, but only 1/6 of those who underwent surgery died, compared to 5/5 of those who had an indication for surgery and did not have it. Conclusions The high mortality rates and need for surgical intervention emphasize the need to promptly identify and manage pneumococcal endocarditis. Physicians ought to recommend vaccination to all patients at risk for severe pneumococcal disease.