An original method for producing acetaldehyde and diacetyl by yeast fermentation

Abstract

In this study a natural culture medium that mimics the synthetic yeast peptone glucose medium used for yeast fermentations was designed to screen and select yeasts capable of producing high levels of diacetyl and acetaldehyde. The presence of whey powder and sodium citrate in the medium along with manganese and magnesium sulfate enhanced both biomass and aroma development. A total of 52 yeasts strains were cultivated in two different culture media, namely, yeast peptone glucose medium and yeast acetaldehyde-diacetyl medium. The initial screening of the strains was based on the qualitative reaction of the acetaldehyde with Schiff's reagent (violet color) and diacetyl with Brady's reagent (yellow precipitate). The fermented culture media of 10 yeast strains were subsequently analyzed by gas chromatography to quantify the concentration of acetaldehyde and diacetyl synthesized. Total titratable acidity values indicated that a total titratable acidity of 5.5 °SH, implying culture medium at basic pH, was more favorable for the acetaldehyde biosynthesis using strain D15 (Candida lipolytica; 96.05 mg L^-1 acetaldehyde) while a total titratable acidity value of 7 °SH facilitated diacetyl flavor synthesis by strain D38 (Candida globosa; 3.58 mg L^-1 diacetyl). Importantly, the results presented here suggest that this can be potentially used in the baking industry.

Keywords: Acetaldehyde; Diacetyl; YAD culture medium; Yeast fermentation

Introduction

Yeasts are commonly used as starter cultures for increasing product-specific aroma production during various fermentation processes (cheese, kefir, sourdough, wine, beer, etc.), as they are capable of synthesizing natural flavors like acetaldehyde (ethanal) or diacetyl (2,3-butanedione) which in turn serve to enhance the quality of the food.¹ Acetaldehyde is the most important carbonyl compound produced during alcoholic fermentation with final concentrations typically varying between 10 and 200 mg L^-1 depending on technological factors such as culture medium composition, pH, fermentation temperature, aeration and SO₂ concentration, and on the yeast strain used.^2,3 Acetaldehyde is found in a variety of foods and beverages such as cheese, yogurt, beer, and wine.^4,5 Generally, acetaldehyde levels reach their peak values in the early fermentation phase; it is then partly reutilized by the yeasts during the rest of the fermentation process.⁶ Acetaldehyde is responsible for the green apple aroma in alimentary products and, usually, the added acetaldehyde is produced by chemical synthesis. Contrarily, by adding using acetaldehyde produced by biosynthesis renders the product safe for human consumption, and the inadvertent addition of the byproducts of chemical acetaldehyde synthesis can be avoided. Diacetyl is almost exclusively synthesized by lactic acid bacteria and is the key flavor compound naturally produced by the Leuconostoc sp.^7,8 Diacetyl is an important flavoring compound that determines specific characteristics of products such as fermented milks and, at very low concentrations (up to 5 mg L^-1), is also responsible for the characteristic "buttery" aroma of milk products.⁹ Furthermore, it is known that while Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces 132.4 mg L^-1 acetaldehyde, less than 1 mg L^-1 diacetyl is produced during red wine fermentation.^10-12 Thus, by using a potential fermentation mix that can produce both acetaldehyde and diacetyl during the fermentation process, in place of a chemically synthesized product, it is possible to confirm to the current global trend of replacing synthetic products with naturally obtained products, while concurrently satisfying consumer demand for natural compounds in alimentary products.

Therefore, the main objective of this study was to identify yeasts capable of biosynthesizing high amounts of acetaldehyde and diacetyl and to assess their proposed use as natural products in fermentation products during industrial production. This is necessary because any product on the market that already contains this aroma cannot be further used in patisserie products.

Materials and methods

Yeast strains

The yeasts strains utilized in this study were isolated from various sources in the laboratories of BIOALIMENT (biotechnology applied in food industry - integrated center for research and education), "Dunarea de Jos", University of Galati, Faculty of Food Science and Engineering. Every strain was assigned a unique code in the MIUG collection of the "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, and simultaneously, a unique code for the microorganism collection of the "Petru Poni" Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry (ICMPP). Pure strains were stored at -80 °C in YPG culture medium supplemented with 20% glycerol.¹³ Further, the taxonomic classification of the isolated yeasts was determined and flavor production was followed by gas chromatography (GS).

Culture conditions

In this study, we designed and used a natural culture medium, yeast acetaldehyde-diacetyl medium (YAD), that could mimic the synthetic YPG culture medium, to select yeast strains capable of producing high levels of diacetyl and acetaldehyde. Importantly, the sodium citrate, manganese and magnesium sulfate, which are part of the YAD culture medium, are consumed by the microorganisms during growth and biosynthesis, thereby rendering the YAD culture medium 'natural'. For selecting yeast strains capable of producing diacetyl and acetaldehyde, we designed a culture medium with the following composition: 10 g L^-1 dextrose; 50 g L^-1 yeast extract; 5 g L^-1 sodium citrate; 10 g L^-1 whey powder; 0.05 g L^-1 manganese sulfate; 0.2 g L^-1 magnesium sulfate. The pH was adjusted between 6 and 7 using 0.1 N HCl. The culture medium was sterilized at 120 °C for 20 min, and this culture medium was designated YAD (yeast diacetyl acetaldehyde). The dormant yeasts were activated by inoculating them in standard YPG medium and transferred to YAD culture medium during the log growth phase by inoculating 5 mL of YAD culture medium with a 20% yeast suspension that was activated in YPG medium for 24 h and had an absorbance of 0.5 at 600 nm. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h under static conditions in order to reduce the evaporation of volatile substances. After fermentation, the medium was filtered to remove cells and subjected to Gas chromatography for identification and quantification of acetaldehyde and diacetyl production.

Identification of the yeast strains using ID 32 C™

ID 32 C™ is a standardized system of yeast identification that uses 32 miniaturized assimilation tests and a database. The ID 32 C™ strip consists of 32 cupules, each containing a dehydrated carbohydrate substrate. A semi-solid, minimal medium is added along with a suspension of the yeast to be tested. After 24-48 h of incubation, growth in each cupule was read using the ATB Expression, the mini API instrument, or visually. Identification was performed using the Apiweb™ identification software.

Detection of diacetyl and acetaldehyde in culture medium

Detection of aldehydes with Schiff's reagent

Schiff's test is a qualitative test for the presence of aldehyde functional groups wherein, a colorless Schiff reagent turns into a characteristic violet color when aldehyde groups are present in the sample added.¹⁴ The reaction was performed by adding 500 µL of Schiff's reagent to the 5 mL of medium fermented for 48 h at 30 °C. The media samples were assigned scores between 0 and 5 based on reaction intensity at 5 s after reagent addition, with 0 denoting no acetaldehyde production; 1-3 denoting low production of acetaldehyde, 4 denoting good production of acetaldehyde, and 5 denoting very good production of acetaldehyde. Only samples with high aldehyde content (score 5) were further tested to determine if acetaldehyde was indeed present in high amounts.

Detection of diacetyl with Brady's reagent

2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH, Brady's reagent) is a chemical compound which can be used to qualitatively detect the presence of ketone or aldehyde functional groups. The test is considered positive if a yellow (aliphatic), orange or red (aromatic) precipitate is present. DNPH does not react with other carbonyl-containing functional groups such as carboxylic acids, amides or esters.¹⁵ The test was performed by adding 250 µL of Brady's reagent to 2.5 mL of medium fermented for 48 h at 30 °C. As diacetyl is an aliphatic compound, only those strains that gave a yellow precipitate were selected for further investigation. Similar to Schiff's reaction, the samples were evaluated based on intensity of the yellow precipitate and this was assigned a score between 0 and 5, where 0 denotes no diacetyl production, 1-3 low production of diacetyl, 4 good production of diacetyl and 5 very good production of diacetyl. Further, results from both the Schiff test and the DNPH test were considered together in order to select strains capable of producing both acetaldehyde and diacetyl. For identification of diacetyl and acetaldehyde in the culture medium, the same strain was simultaneously inoculated into both YAD and YPG media.

Total titratable acidity (TTA)

TTA was quantified according to the method of Soxhlet-Henkel using a sodium hydroxide standard solution to neutralize the acid content of the sample (herein, suspension of the culture medium).¹⁶ The procedure used for estimating TTA is as follows. A solution containing 5 g of the sample and 45 mL of distilled water in titration flask was stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 2 min and 2 mL of phenolphthalein added. Subsequently, 0.25 M NaOH solution was added to this suspension until the solution turned a light pink color. TTA was calculated using the formula TTA (°SH) = 2 × 2.5 × ν₁, where ν₁ is the volume of 0.25 M NaOH consumed for neutralization of the acids in the sample. All titrations were performed in triplicate. This method was also used to monitor how culture medium acidity affected aroma biosynthesis during fermentation.

Quantification of diacetyl and acetaldehyde in the culture medium

Diacetyl and acetaldehyde in the culture medium were quantified using gas chromatography (GS) spectra of the analyzed samples and from equations obtained from the calibration curves for acetaldehyde and diacetyl. The concentrations used for obtaining the calibration curve for acetaldehyde were: 5, 10, 20, 40, 80, and 200 µL L^-1, while those for diacetyl were 2.5, 5, 10, 25, and 50 µL L^-1.

GS spectra were obtained using an Agilent 6890 N Gas Chromatograph with an FID Detector and a Suprawax-280 (100% PEG bonded, crosslinked) 60.0 m × 250 µm × 0.25 µm capillary column with the following parameters: He gas flow set at 2 mL min^-1, inlet temperature 150 °C, split ratio 10:1; sample volume 1 µL. The temperature program started at 40 °C (maintained for 1 min), and was followed by heating to 110 °C at a rate of 10 °C min^-1, and then till 270 °C at 40 °C min^-1.

Results and discussion

Taxonomic classification of the isolated yeasts

A total of 52 yeast isolates were taxonomically classified using the Apiweb™ identification software (Table 1). Thirty isolates were identified as belonging to the genus Candida spp., ten isolates belonged to genus Saccharomyces spp. (S. cerevisiae), five isolates were Cryptococcus spp., one isolate belonged to genus Geotrichum spp. (Geotrichum capitatum), and six isolates were Rhodotorula spp.

Table 1
The yeasts isolates identified with ID 32 C™ and the selection of the yeast strains for acetaldehyde and diacetyl biosynthesis in liquid culture medium.

No.	ICMPP ID code	Species	ID 32C™ (%)	YPG culture medium Schiff's reaction for acetaldehydea	YAD culture medium Schiff's reaction for acetaldehydea	YPG culture medium Brady's reaction for diacetyla	YAD culture medium Brady's reaction for diacetyla
1	D1	Candida famata	98.7	0	2	1	1
2	D2	Candida rugosa	82.9	0	1	1	1
3	D3	Rhodotorula minuta	99.9	0	2	1	1
4	D4	Rhodotorula mucilaginosa	91.9	0	1	1	1
5	D5	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	98.5	0	5	1	1
6	D6	Candida pelliculosa	99.9	0	4	1	1
7	D7	Cryptococcus uniguttulatus	99.9	0	2	1	1
8	D8	Cryptococcus terreus	99.9	0	1	1	1
9	D9	Candida famata	99.2	0	2	1	1
10	D10	Candida famata	98.7	0	2	1	1
11	D11	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	2	1	1
12	D12	Candida krusei	85.7	0	1	1	1
13	D13	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	4	1	1
14	D14	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	2	1	1
15	D15	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	5	1	5
16	D16	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	1	1	1
17	D17	Candida colliculosa	99.9	0	5	1	1
18	D19	Candida holmii	87.9	0	2	1	1
19	D20	Candida pelliculosa	87.0	0	1	1	1
20	D21	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	5	1	1
21	D22	Candida pelliculosa	99.9	0	3	1	1
22	D23	Candida colliculosa	99.9	0	2	1	1
23	D24	Candida famata	96.9	0	2	1	1
24	D25	Cryptococcus albidus	99.5	0	4	1	1
25	D26	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	3	1	1
26	D27	Candida sphaerica	97.2	0	4	1	1
27	D28	Geotrichum capitatum	98.1	0	2	1	1
28	D29	Candida lambica	92.7	0	4	1	1
29	D30	Candida colliculosa	99.9	0	5	1	1
30	D31	Cryptococcus terreus	99.9	0	2	1	1
31	D32	Candida lambica	99.9	0	2	1	1
32	D33	Rhodotorula minuta	99.9	0	4	1	1
33	D34	Candida lambica	96.4	0	3	1	1
34	D35	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.6	0	3	1	1
35	D36	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.7	0	1	1	1
36	D37	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.7	0	5	1	1
37	D38	Candida globosa	99.9%	0	5	1	1
38	D39	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.6%	0	3	1	1
39	D47	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.9	0	2	1	1
40	D49	Candida lipolytica	99.9	0	5	1	1
41	D50	Candida krusei	85.7	0	5	1	1
42	D51	Candida silvicola	99.9	0	2	1	1
43	D52	Rhodotorula glutinis	83.1	0	2	1	1
44	D53	Candida famata	93.2	0	4	1	1
45	D54	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.9	0	4	1	1
46	D55	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.4	0	2	1	1
47	D56	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.9	0	2	1	1
48	D57	Cryptococcus curvatus	99.9	0	2	1	1
49	D58	Candida pelliculosa	99.9	0	2	1	1
50	D59	Rhodotorula mucilaginosa	88.2	0	3	1	1
51	D60	Rhodotorula mucilaginosa	86.6	0	1	1	1
52	D61	Saccharomyces cerevisiae	99.9	0	3	1	1

• ^a
  The yeast strains were noted as: 0, the yeast strain that does not produce acetaldehyde/diacetyl; 1 to 3, low producers of acetaldehyde/diacetyl; 4, good producers of acetaldehyde/diacetyl and 5, very good producers of acetaldehyde/diacetyl.
• The bold values are indicating the very good producers of acetaldehyde/diacetyl.

Yeast selection by detection of acetaldehyde and diacetyl in culture medium

In order to identify yeast isolates capable of both acetaldehyde and diacetyl biosynthesis during fermentation, the isolates were inoculated into both YAD and YPG media and flavor biosynthesis was compared between these two media (Tables 1 and 2) using Schiff's test and Brady's test for the determination of acetaldehyde and diacetyl, respectively.

Table 2
Gas chromatography and total titratable acidity (TTA) values for selected fermented mediums.

No	ICMPP ID codea	ALDb retention time from GC chromatogram (min)	ALDc (µL L-1)	ALDd (mg L-1)	DAe retention time from GC chromatogram (min)	DAf (µL L-1)	DAg (mg L-1)	TTA (°SH)
1	D5	4.394	109.85	86.23	6.914	1.72	1.69	23.5
2	D13	4.409	98.41	77.25	6.931	0.82	0.8	30
3	D15	4.388	122.36	96.05	6.964	0.11	0.107	5.5
4	D17	4.386	66.86	52.49	6.923	0.97	0.951	10.5
5	D21	4.387	66.78	52.42	6.999	0.127	0.124	6.5
6	D30	4.402	69.17	54.3	6.938	0.22	0.215	10
7	D37	4.402	60.66	47.62	6.991	0.26	0.255	8.5
8	D38	4.391	95.63	75.07	6.896	3.65	3.58	7
9	D49	4.391	98.47	77.3	6.987	2.07	2.03	6.5
10	D50	4.391	79.56	62.45	6.929	0.072	0.07	7

• ^a
  The code given to the yeasts strains in microorganisms collection of "Petru Poni" Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry (ICMPP).
• ^b
  Acetaldehyde.
• ^c
  The concentration of acetaldehyde was calculate using calibration equation.
• ^d
  The conversion of the acetaldehyde concentration in mg L^-1.
• ^e
  Diacetyl.
• ^f
  The concentration of diacetyl calculated using calibration equation.
• ^g
  The conversion of the diacetyl concentration in mg L^-1.

Selection of yeasts using Schiff's reagent

Acetaldehyde biosynthesis depends on the type of carbon and nitrogen sources in the medium, incubation time, agitation rate, and incubation temperature. Therefore, dextrose was added to the YAD medium as it is a very accessible carbon source for yeasts. Whey powder was added as a natural and very economical source of nitrogen, while manganese and magnesium sulfate are necessary growth factors for yeast culture. Sodium citrate in the culture medium acts as a precursor for and stimulates diacetyl biosynthesis (Table 1).¹⁷

Given the above and as can observed from the results presented in Table 1, yeasts inoculated in YPG did not produce acetaldehyde, while fermentation in YAD culture medium led to the biosynthesis of acetaldehyde due to the presence of the dextrose and whey powder in this culture medium. Nine yeasts strains produced high levels of acetaldehyde in YAD (Schiff's reaction score 5), and were selected for further analyses by gas chromatography. The nine yeast strains found to be good producers of acetaldehyde are as follows: three strains of S. cerevisiae: D5, D37 and D49, two strains of Candida lipolytica: D15 and D21, two strains of Candida colliculosa: D17 and D30, one strain of Candida globosa: D38, and one strain of Candida krusei: D50).

Selection of the yeasts using Brady's reagent

Similar to aldehyde production, yeasts inoculated in YPG did not synthesize diacetyl, and only one strain produced diacetyl when inoculated in to YAD medium, even though sodium citrate was added to the medium. The yeast isolate with a score of 5 for diacetyl biosynthesis (C. lipolytica; D13) was then selected for further analysis by GC.

Gas chromatographic analysis

The acetaldehyde and diacetyl concentrations obtained by GC, and TTA values of the selected isolates are presented in Table 2.

The data presented in Table 2 show that considerable amounts of acetaldehyde (75.07 mg L^-1) and diacetyl (3.58 mg L^-1) were obtained when the D38 isolate (identified as C. globosa by the API test) was used for fermentation in the YAD medium.

GC spectrum peak area of acetaldehyde (retention time approx. 4.3 min) and diacetyl (retention time approx. 7.0 min) (Figs. 1 and 2) demonstrated that yeast strain D15 (identified as C. lipolytica by API test) was the best producer of acetaldehyde (96.05 mg L^-1) in YAD medium. However, the amount of diacetyl produced by this yeast strain was very low (0.107 mg L^-1) even though the Brady reaction data presented in Table 1 imply otherwise. This can be explained by the fact that the Brady reagent reacts with both ketones and aldehydes, and the presence of a greater amount of precipitate was due to the presence of high amounts of the acetaldehyde, rather than diacetyl. Therefore, the volatiles produced by this strain were further analyzed by GC in order to identify the type and concentration of the compounds produced during fermentation. Isolate D38 (C. globosa) was the best producer of diacetyl (3.58 mg L^-1) in the same culture medium (YAD), confirming the results obtained with Brady's and Schiff's tests. Importantly, this D38 strain is also capable of biosynthesizing a substantial amount of acetaldehyde (75.07 mg L^-1) which is, albeit, slightly lesser than that of the D15 strain.

Fig. 1
GS spectrum of medium resulted after the fermentation of D38 yeast strain in YAD medium.

Fig. 2
GS spectrum of the medium resulted from the fermentation of D15 yeast strain in YAD medium.

Given that the literature on the biosynthesis of aroma from yeasts is scant, at best on the basis of our results, we could discern only few basic inferences. The data presented in Table 2 suggest that, with respect to the yeast strain D15, an alkaline pH is more favorable for the acetaldehyde biosynthesis as the culture medium had a TTA of 5.5 °SH. Such alkalinity is, however, not optimal for the synthesis of diacetyl, as the TTA of the medium fermented with D38 was 7 °SH, implying that a neutral pH favors diacetyl biosynthesis.

Conclusions

We propose a new and original method to produce acetaldehyde and diacetyl for use in the bakery industry using yeast fermentation. A natural culture medium that mimics the synthetic yeast culture (YPG) was developed and used successfully to screen potential isolates and produce substantial amounts of both acetaldehyde and diacetyl. The yeasts species were identified using ID 32 C™ tests; and gas chromatography was used to confirm acetaldehyde and diacetyl production and accurately quantify the amount produced during fermentation. Although C. lipolytica was capable of synthesizing high amounts of acetaldehyde, C. globosa could biosynthesize substantial amounts of both diacetyl and acetaldehyde under neutral pH conditions. In the light of these results, we propose this system to be tested for biotechnological transfer to industry-level fermenters and to be used during the production of fermented products.

Acknowledgments

This publication benefited from the financial support of the project "Program of Excellency in the multidisciplinary doctoral and post-doctoral research of chronic diseases", contract no. POSDRU/159/1.5/S/133377, beneficiary "Gr. T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Iasi, project co-financed from the European Social Fund through the Sectoral Operational Program Human Resources Development (SOP HRD) 2007-2013, and by Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS - UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-ID-PCCE-2011-2-0028.

References

• ¹ Romano P, Capece A, Jespersen L. Taxonomic and ecological diversity of food and beverage yeasts. In: Querol A, Fleet GH, eds. The Yeast Handbook. Yeasts in Food and Beverages Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
• ² Swiegers JH, Bartowsky PA, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavor. Aust J Grape Wine R. 2005;11:139-173.
• ³ Pan W, Jussier D, Terrade N, Yada RJ, Mira de Orduna R. Kinetics of sugars, organic acids and acetaldehyde during simultaneous yeast-bacterial fermentations at different pH values. Food Res Int. 2011;44:660-666.
• ⁴ Weerkamp AH, Klijn N, Neeter R, Smit G. Properties of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria from raw milk and naturally fermented raw milk products. Neth Milk Dairy J. 1996;50:319-332.
• ⁵ Yi Young D, Kakuda Y, Subden RE. Higher alcohols, diacetyl, acetoin and 2,3-butanediol biosynthesis in grapes undergoing carbonic maceration. Food Res Int. 2006;39:112-116.
• ⁶ Cheraiti N, Guezenec S, Salmon JM. Very early acetaldehyde production by industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: a new intrinsic character. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010;86:693-700.
• ⁷ Sanchez JJ, Martinez B, Rodriguez A. Rational selection of Leuconostoc strains for mixed starters based on the physiological biodiversity found in raw milk fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol 2005;105:377-378.
• ⁸ Alvarez-Martin P, Belen Florez A, Hernandez-Barranco A, Mayo B. Interaction between dairy yeasts and lactic acid bacteria strains during milk fermentation. Food Control 2008;19:62-70.
• ⁹ Oberman H, Libudzisz Z. Fermented milks. In: Wood BJB, ed. Microbiology of Fermented Foods London: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1998:309–350.
• ¹⁰ Yamauchi Y, Okamoto T, Murayama H, Kajino K, Nagara A, Noguchi K. Rapid maturation of beer using an immobilized yeast bioreactor. 2. Balance of total diacetyl reduction and regeneration. J Biotechnol 1995;38:109-116.
• ¹¹ Regodon Mateos JA, Perez-Nevado F, Ramirez Fernandez M. Influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strain on the major volatile compounds of wine. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2006;40:151-157.
• ¹² Smogrovicova D. Flavour science, formation of beer volatile compounds at different fermentation temperatures using immobilized yeasts. In: Ferreira V, Lopez R, eds. Flavour Science: Proceedings from XIII Weurman Flavour Research Symposium 2014:129–131.
• ¹³ Schiraldi C, Valli V, Molinaro A, Carteni M, De Rosa M. Exopolysaccharides production in Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Lactobacillus casei exploiting microfiltration. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2006;33:384-390.
• ¹⁴ Weiss L. Histology: Cell and Tissue Biology 5th ed. New York: Elsevier Biomedical; 1983.
• ¹⁵ Kadam SS, Tambe ST, Grampurohit ND, Gaikwad DD. Review article on chemical importance of Brady's reagent. Int J Res Pharm Chem 2012;2:1086-1092.
• ¹⁶ Calamari L, Gobbi L, Bani P. Improving the prediction ability of FT-MIR spectroscopy to assess titratable acidity in cow's milk. Food Chem 2016;192:477-484.
• ¹⁷ Martino GP, Quintana IM, Espariz M, Blancato VS, Magni C. Aroma compounds generation in citrate metabolism of Enterococcus faecium: genetic characterization of type I citrate gene cluster. Int J Food Microbiol 2016;218:27-37.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  Oct-Dec 2016

History

• Received
  2 June 2015
• Accepted
  29 Feb 2016