Alkali pretreated of wheat straw and its enzymatic hydrolysis

INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY

Alkali pretreated of wheat straw and its enzymatic hydrolysis

Lirong Han^#; Juntao Feng

R&D Center of Biorational Pesticides, Northwest A & F University, 22 Xinong Road, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

ABSTRACT

The efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose can be improved by various pretreatments of the substrate. In order to increase the efficiency of enzymatic saccharification of the wheat straw, we determined the effect of different pretreatments on the physical structure, chemical components and enzymatic saccharification of wheat straw. Our results showed that combination of grinding and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) treatment had high effect on the enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straws. The optimal pretreatment condition was to grind the wheat straws into the sizes of 120 meshes followed by treatment with 1.0% NaOH for 1.5 h (121°C/15psi). Under this condition, the cellulose content of wheat straw was increased by 44.52%, while the content of hemicellulose and lignin was decreased by 44.15% and 42.52%, respectively. Scanning Electronic Microscopy and infrared spectrum analyses showed that significant changes occurred in the structure of wheat straws after pretreatment, which is favorable for the hydrolysis and saccharification. Cellulase produced by Penicillium waksmanii F10-2 was used to hydrolyze the pretreated wheat straw and the optimal condition was determined to be 30 h of enzymatic reaction under the temperature of 55°C, pH 5.5 and substrate concentration of 3%.

Key words: Cellulase; Cellulose; Fermentation; Hydrolysis; Lignocellulosic; Pretreatment

INTRODUCTION

Production of biofuel from lignocellulosic feedstock has attracted significant interests worldwide. Lignocellulosic biomass including various agricultural residues is an abundant and renewable resource on earth (1,2). Cellulose is the predominant polymer in lignocellulosic biomass, with a small amount of hemicellulose and lignin (3). Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose is a promising method for the conversion of waste cellulose to glucose. Many factors, such as the content of lignin, crystallinity of cellulose, degree of polymerization (DP), moisture content and particle size, affect the hydrolytic efficiency of the cellulose present in the lignocellulosic biomass (4-7). Lignin is one of the most abundant polymers in nature. The complex three-dimensional (3D) polyaromatic matrix of lignin prevents enzymes from accessing some regions of the cellulose polymers (8). In addition, the amorphous heteropolymer is also water-insoluble and optically inactive, which make it very difficult to be degraded.

Pretreatment of wheat straws and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose have been identified as the primary cost barriers in the processing of lignocellulosic materials to fermentable sugars (9, 10). Several different pretreatment methods have been used to facilitate the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials (11, 12). One of the most thoroughly investigated methods is alkali pretreatment in which the alkaline solution is used to remove lignin and various uronic acid substitutions on hemicelluloses, leading to the increased accessibility of enzymes to the hemicellulose and cellulose (4). Generally, alkaline pretreatment is more effective for the subsequent hydrolysis of agricultural residues and herbaceous crops than that for the wood materials (13).

Wheat straw is a byproduct of wheat cultivation produced throughout the world. Only a small amount of wheat straw was used as livestock feeds, farmyard manure and fuel, while a large part of the wheat straw was discarded on the field or burned directly, which results in the waste of fuel resources as well as environmental contamination. Extensive studies have been carried out to extend the uses of wheat straws and increase its additional value. For example, wheat straws can be hydrolyzed into reducing sugar, which can subsequently be fermented to target products, e.g., ethanol or other chemical products by suitable microorganisms (14). The main purpose of this study was to remove lignin and hemicellulose, reduce cellulose crystallinity, and identify optimal conditions for pretreatment of wheat straws and hydrolysis of cellulose. In this paper, we report on the changes in chemical characteristics, physical properties and cellulose microstructure for pretreated wheat straw.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wheat straw materials

Wheat straw was purchased from a local harvest store and was smashed to the sizes of 80 meshes. After thorough washing with tap water till the washing-off water was clean and colorless, the particles of wheat straws (80 meshes) were dried in 50ºC. The percentage of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in the dried wheat straw was 39.67%, 25.66% and 20.33%, respectively.

Microorganism

The strain of Penicillium waksmanii F10-2, obtained from Biorational Pesticides Research and Service Center (Yangling, China), was used in this study. The P. waksmanii culture was maintained on agar slants (10.0% wheat bran extract, 1.5% agar, pH 5.5) at 28ºC and subcultured monthly.

Production of cellulase

The cellulase was produced by P. waksmanii F10-2 under submerged batch conditions. Fermentation mix was prepared by incorporating 2% of wheat straw of the 80 mesh as the sole carbon source into a basal medium. The basal media contains 1.1% peptone, 0.27% KH₂PO₄, 0.3% (NH₄)₂SO₄ and 0.02%MgSO₄ .7H₂O. The pH of each mixture was adjusted to 5.5.

P. waksmanii inoculum was prepared by washing slant cultures with 3 ml of sterilized water. The spore concentration was determined by hemocytometer. Two ml spore suspension (10⁶-10⁷ spores/ml) was inoculated into 250ml flask containing 100 ml freshly prepared fermentation mixture. After 5 days of shaking (136 rpm) at 27°C, broth culture was filtered. The culture filtrate had an activity of 4.32 FPU/ml as measured by the methods developed previously (15). Subsequently， the broth culture were concentrated by polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membrane and the activity of condensed enzyme liquid was 46 FPU/ml, which was used for further enzymatic hydrolysis experiment. One unit of enzyme was defined as the amount of enzyme capable of producing 1μmol of reducing sugars in 1 min.

Analytical methods

Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin contents were determined by the method developed previously (16). The content of reducing sugars was determined by the DNS method (17). Infrared spectra were measured by a NICOLET 330FT-2R FT-IR spectrometry. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was performed by using a HITACHIS-570 SEM instrument and the images were taken accordingly.

Pretreatment of wheat straws

Ground wheat straw in different sizes was pretreated by sodium hydroxide (NaOH) before enzymatic hydrolysis. Briefly, mixture of the wheat straw and NaOH (0.25–1.5% w/v) was treated with 121ºC /15psi for 0.5 to 2.5 h at a solid loading condition of 10% (w/v). The pretreated solids were washed with 800mL of hot deionized water and used for determination of total solids. The solids were dried at 55ºC and weighed.

Enzymatic saccharification

The NaOH-pretreated straws were hydrolyzed using condensed enzyme liquid. The hydrolysis reaction was performed in 0.1M citrate buffer (pH 5.0) at 50ºC for 36 h with shaking (150 rpm). The effects of different factors e.g., pretreatment, reaction time (6–48 h), substrate concentration (1–11% w/v), temperature (40–60ºC) and pH (4–6) on the enzymatic hydrolysis was determined by maintaining the enzyme/substrate ratio at 25 FPU/g. The percentage of hydrolysis of straws was calculated according to the following formula (18).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Pretreatment of wheat by physical and chemical methody

The effect of wheat straw sizes on the enzymatic hydrolysis: Milling reduces the size of the materials and degree of crystallinity of lignocelluloses, which improves the susceptibility of these materials to enzymatic hydrolysis and enhances the efficiency of degradation. (19, 20). The hydrolysis efficiency was determined for the milled wheat straws with the sizes from 20 to 240 meshes. The results showed that as the size of wheat straw was reduced (especially from 40 to 120 meshes), the rate of enzymatic saccharification was increased significantly (Fig. 1). The rate of enzymatic saccharification for the 120 meshes of wheat straw was 21.50%, which was 4.7 times of the untreated wheat straw. Studies have shown that without any pretreatment, corn stover with sizes of 53-75 μm was 1.5 times more productive than larger corn stover particles of 425–710 μm (20). We showed here that the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency was not increased significantly once the size of the wheat straws was reduced to less than 160 meshes (Fig. 1). Therefore, we select 120 meshes as the optimal size for hydrolysis of wheat straws.

The effect of NaOH concentration on the enzymatic hydrolysis: The mechanism of alkaline hydrolysis is believed to be saponification of intermolecular ester bonds, which crosslinks xylan hemicelluloses and other components, for example, lignin and other hemicellulose (11). The 120 meshes wheat straws were pretreated with 0.2, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25 and 1.5% of NaOH before enzymatic hydrolysis. The results showed that as the concentration of NaOH was increased, the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency was also increased (Fig. 2). The maximal concentration of reducing sugar (343.95 mg/g substrate) was obtained when the NaOH concentration reached 1.0%.

The pretreatment time of NaOH on the hydrolysis efficiency by cellulase: The enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency was measured for the 120 meshes wheat straw pretreated with 1.0% NaOH for different times. The results showed that as the NaOH pretreatment time was increased, the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency was enhanced significantly (Fig. 3). However, when the pretreatment time was over 1.5 h, the enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency was gradually decreased. This might be due to the fact that long time pretreatment with NaOH partially destroyed cellulose and hemicellulose, leading to the reduced concentration of reducing sugars in the enzymatic reactions. These results suggested that combinational pretreatment with milling and NaOH can enhance the efficiency for hydrolysis of cellulose and production of reducing sugars.

The effect of pretreatment on the components of wheat straws

After pretreatment of the 120 meshes wheat straws with 1.0% NaOH (121ºC/15psi) for 1.5 h, the percentage of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin was 57.33%, 14.33% and 11.7%, respectively. Compared to the wheat straws that were not pretreated, the content of cellulose was increased by 44.52%, while the content of hemicellulose and lignin was decreased by 44.15% and 42.45%, respectively. The purpose of NaOH pretreatment was to partially remove lignin and increase the cellulose content and sample porosity, which was instrumental for the hydrolysis of wheat straw samples. Our results showed that pretreatment with NaOH removed lignin and at the same time partially degraded the hemicellulose.

The effect of pretreatment on the chemical structure of wheat straws

Infrared spectrum analysis for the wheat straws with or without NaOH pretreatment was shown in Fig.4. The characteristic absorption peak of the infrared spectrum in the lignin of wheat straw has a certain relationship with its category ascription. The main bond of hemicellulose and lignin was C-O-C with its characteristic absorption peak at 1462, 1425 and 1320 cm^-1. Due to the presence of aromatic ring, the characteristic absorption peak was located at 1612 cm^-1. The absorption peak of lignin and similar lignin group has the characteristic peak at 1510 and 1595 cm^-1 (8, 21-23). The characteristic absorption peak of lignin and hemicellulose in the wheat straw pretreated with NaOH was significantly weakened compared to that in the wheat straw without pretreatment (Fig. 4), suggesting that lignin and hemicellulose were partially degraded during the process of pretreatment.

The effect of pretreatment on the surface structure of wheat straw

The surface structure of the wheat straws without pretreatment was tight, orderly and the texture was relatively hard (Fig. 5A). In comparison to the sample that was not subjected to enzymatic hydrolysis, there was only a slight crimp on the surface of wheat straw after enzymatic hydrolysis for 30h, and there was no significant change in the original structure of lignocellulose upon enzymatic hydrolysis (Fig. 5B).

In contrast, due to the partial removal of hemicelluloses and lignin, the surface of the wheat straws with NaOH pretreatment became soft, loosened, and contained some micro-pores on the surface of the wheat straw. (Fig. 5C). In addition, the accessible surface area was increased after pretreatment, which is favorable for action of cellulase. In comparison to the sample that was121ºC/15spi pretreated ,there was more severe degradation could be seen on the surface of pretreated wheat straw followed by enzymatic hydrolysis, which the lignin frame was further reduce and more holes and cracks were seen on the sample surface (Fig. 5D).

Enzymatic hydrolysis

Cellulase is widely present in organisms. However, cellulase produced by different organisms is different in its components and ability to degrade cellulose. Most of the current studies on cellulase are focused on Truchoderma, especially T. reesei (24). Compared to Truchoderma, Penicillium can synthesize more balanced cellulose degrading enzyme system, which can compensate the insufficient production of glucosaccharase in Truchoderma. P. waksmanii F10-2 has high activity to degrade cellulose. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated wheat straw was carried out by filtrate of P. waksmanii F10-2. The various parameters such as hydrolysis time, substrate concentration, temperature and pH were optimized to achieve maximum saccharification of wheat straw.

The effect of time on the enzymatic hydrolysis: We further determined the effect of enzymatic reaction time on the efficiency of hydrolysis for the pretreated wheat straw. The pretreated wheat straws were mixed with cellulase for 6-48 h and the concentration of released reducing sugar was measured every 6 h. The results showed that as the enzymatic reaction time was increased, the concentration of the released reducing sugars was also increased (Fig. 6). The concentration of the reducing sugars was 343.95 mg per 1 gram of substrate with a maximal saccharification rate of 43% at 30 h of enzymatic reaction. The content of reducing sugar was gradually decreased after 30 h of reaction. This might be due to the inhibition of the enzyme activity by the accumulated hydrolysis products.

The effect of substrate concentration on the enzymatic hydrolysis: The effect of substrate concentration on the efficiency of hydrolysis was determined by using 1%-10% of wheat straw pretreated with alkaline. The results showed that the maximal saccharification rate of 43.78% was achieved when the substrate concentration (pretreated wheat straw) was 3% (Fig. 7). At this substrate concentration, the reducing sugar was 350.18 mg per 1 gram of substrate. When the substrate concentration was less than 3%, the enzymatic reaction speed was increased as the substrate concentration was increased. Once the substrate was saturated and further increased, the concentration of reducing sugars was gradually decreased. Studies have shown that as the substrates were increased, the feedback inhibition by cellobiose and glucose was enhanced, leading to the reduced production of reducing sugars in the enzymatic reaction (25).

The effect of temperature on the enzymatic hydrolysis: Temperature is an important factor, which influences not only the speed of enzymatic reaction, but alto the activity of the cellulose. Normally, as the temperature is increased in a certain range, the enzymatic reaction is accelerated. However, when the temperature is further increased beyond this range, the enzyme becomes denatured, leading to the reduced speed of enzymatic reaction. The optimal reaction temperature for cellulase is between 45ºC and 55ºC. However, the optimal temperature varies for the cellulase from different sources and different enzymatic matrix. We showed here that the concentration of reducing sugars was increased with the reaction temperature increased (Fig. 8), and the maximal concentration of reducing sugar (341.87 mg/g substrate) with a saccharification rate of 42.74% was achieved. When the temperature was further increased beyond 55ºC, the concentration of reducing sugar was reduced. Thus, the optimal temperature for enzymatic hydrolysis was 55ºC.

The effect of pH on the enzymatic hydrolysis: The speed of the enzymatic reaction was determined under the condition of pH 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 and 6. The results showed that pH 5 achieved maximal concentration of reducing sugars with 350.03 mg per 1 gram of substrate (Fig. 9). These results suggested that the activity was affected by the environmental pH. Maximal reaction speed was achieved at pH 5. When pH was higher or lower than 5, the enzymatic reaction speed was reduced. Changes of pH may result in the loss of cellulase activity or dissociation between substrate and catalytic group of enzyme active center, leading to the reduced speed of enzymatic reaction. Therefore, pH should be controlled in the cellulase-catalyzed hydrolysis reaction to achieve maximal activity of cellulase.

CONCLUSION

Many factors including the content of lignin, surface areas, crystallinity and degree of polymerization affect the efficiency of substrate hydrolysis by cellulase. Studies have shown that the main factor affecting the hydrolysis by cellulase is the accessible surface area of substrate, followed by the content of lignin and crystallinity (26). The purpose of pretreatment is to remove lignin and hemicellulose, reduce cellulose crystallinity and increase the porosity. Therefore, selecting appropriate pretreatment methods plays a significant role in increasing the efficiency of cellulose hydrolysis. The pretreatment method used in this study attempts to increase the accessible surface area, decrease the content of lignin and disrupt the polymerization of lignocellulose. Our results showed that milling of the wheat straw into the sizes of 120 meshes followed by treatment with 1.0% of NaOH for 1.5 h increased the content of cellulose by 44.52%, while decreased the content of hemicellulose and lignin by 44.15% and 42.45%, respectively. SEM and infrared spectrum analyses showed that the surface structure of the wheat straw and lignin was significantly changed after pretreatment, which is more favorable for the hydrolysis reaction. The optimal condition for the cellulase-catalyzed hydrolysis was (1) 30 h of reaction; (2) 3% of substrate; (3) 55ºC and (4) pH 5.0.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to acknowledge financial support from the Key Scientific and Technological Innovation Special Projects of Shaanxi"13115" (No. 2007ZDKG-04).

Submitted: December 08, 2009; Returned to authors for corrections: June 29, 2011; Approved: January 16, 2012.

References

• 1. Aden, A.; Ruth, M.; Ibsen, K.; Jechura, J.; Neeves, K.; Sheehan, J.; Wallace, B.; Montague, L.; Slayton, A.; Lukas, J. (2002). Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid prehydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438: http://www.nrel.gov
• 2. Agarwal, U.P.; Atalla, R.H.; Forsskahl, I. (1995). Sequential treatment of mechanical and chemi-mechanical pulps with light and heat: A Raman spectroscopic study. Holzforschung 49, 300-312.
• 3. Chang, V.S. ; Holtzapple, M.T. (2000). Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol 84-86, 537.
• 4. Chang，C.C.；Ng，C.C.；Wang，C.Y.；Shyu，Y.T. (2009).  Activity of cellulase from Thermoactinomycetes and Bacillus spp. isolated from Brassica waste compost. Braz. J. Microbiol. 66, 304-308.
• 5. Fan, L.T.; Lee, Y. (1980). Beardmore DH. Mechanism of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Effects of major structural features of cellulose on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng 22, 177-199.
• 6. Goering, H.K.; Van Soest, P.J. (1970). Forage fiber analysis. Agriculture handbook. Agricultural Research Services, United States Department of Agriculture, No.379.
• 7. Gregg, D.J.; Saddler, J.N. (1996). Factors affecting cellulose hydrolysis and the potential of enzyme recycle to enhance the efficiency of an integrated wood to ethanol process. Biotechnol. Bioeng 51, 75-383.
• 8. Hendriks, A.T.W.M.; Zeeman, G. (2009). Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol 100, 1018.
• 9. Henning, J.; Tomy, E.; Johan, B.; Folke, T.; Lisbeth, O. (2003). Purification and characterization of five cellulases and one xylanase from Penicillium brasilianumIBT 20888. Enzyme. Microb. Technol 32, 851-861.
• 10. Hsu, T.A. (1996). Pretreatment of biomass. In: Wyman, C.E. (Ed.), Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, 179195.
• 11. Koullas, D.P.; Christakopoulos, P.; Kekos, D.; Macris, B.J.; Koukios, E.G. (1992). Correlating the effect of pretreatment on the enzymatic hydrolysis of straw. Biotechnol. Bioeng 39, 113116.
• 12. Krishna, S.H.; Chowdary, G.V. (2000). Optimization of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. J. Agric. Food Chem 48, 19711976.
• 13. Laureano-Perez, L.; Teymouri, F.; Alizadeh, H.; Dale, B.E. (2005). Understanding factors that limit enzymatic hydrolysis of biomass. Appl. Biochem.Biotechnol. 121-124, 10811099.
• 14. Lynd, L.R.; Elander, R.T.; Wyman, C.E. (1996). Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl. Biochem. Biotech 57/58, 741761.
• 15. Mandels, M.; Andreotti, R.; Roche, C. (1976). Measurement of saccharifying cellulose. Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp 6, 21-33.
• 16. Miller, G.L. (1959). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal. Biochem 31, 426428.
• 17. Mosier, N.; Wyman, C.; Dale, B.; Elander, R.; Lee, Y.Y.; Holtzapple, M.; Ladish, M. (2005). Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol 96, 673686.
• 18. Puri, V.P.; Mamers, H. (1983). Explosive pretreatment of lignocellulosic residues with high-pressure carbon dioxide for the production of fermentation substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 25, 31493161.
• 19. Séné, C.F.B.; McCann, M.C.; Wilson, R.H.; Grinter, R. (1994). Fourier-transfor raman and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy: An investigation of five higher plant cell walls and their components. Plant Physiol 106, 1623-1631.
• 20. Soto, M.L.; Dominguez, M.J.; Lema, J.M. (1994). Enzymatic saccharification of alkali treated sunflower hulls. Bioresour. Technol 49, 539.
• 21. Stewart, D.; Yahiaoui, N.; McDougall, G.J.; Myton, K.; Marque, C.; Boudet, A.M.; Haigh, J. (1997). Fourier-transform infrared and Raman spectroscopic evidence for the incorporation of cinnamaldehydes into the lignin of transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) plants with reduced expression of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. Planta 201, 311-318.
• 22. Sun, Y.; Cheng, J. (2002). Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol 83, 111.
• 23. Thomas, F.; Jennings, L.; Mulcahy, P. (2007). Compositional analysis of lignocellulosic materials: Evaluation of methods used for sugar analysis of waste paper and straw. Bioresour. Technol 98, 3026-3036.
• 24. Zeng, M.; Mosier, N.S.; Huang, C.P.; Sherman, D.M.; Ladisch, M.R. (2007). Microscopic examination of changes of plant cell structure in corn stover due to hot water pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng 97, 265278.
• 25. Zhong, R.Q.; Morrison, W.H.; Himmelsbach, D.S.; Poole, F.L.; Ye, Z.H. (2000). Essential role of caffeoyl coenzyme a O-methyltransferase in lignin biosynthesis in woody poplar plants. Plant Physiol 124, 563-577.
• 26. Zhu, S.D.; Wu, Y.X.; Yu, Z.N.; Chen, Q.M.; Wu, G.Y.; Yu, F.Q.; Wang, C.W.; Jin, S.W. (2006). Microwave-assisted Alkali Pre-treatment of Wheat Straw and its Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Biosyst. Eng 4, 437442.

#

; Shuangxi Zhang; Zhiqing Ma; Yonghong Wang; Xing Zhang

^*

#

These authors contributed equally to this work.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  03 May 2012
• Date of issue
  Mar 2012

History

• Received
  08 Dec 2009
• Accepted
  16 Jan 2012
• Reviewed
  29 June 2011