Vailleau et al.3131 Vailleau B, Qu’hen C, Vidal PP, de Waele C. Probing residual vestibular function with galvanic stimulation in vestibular loss patients. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32:863–71.
|
2011/Paris (France) |
Comparative cross-sectional and control group |
42 individuals with vestibular neuritis and Ménière disease
Freq.: 50 Hz
|
Intensity: 4 mA |
GVS to diagnose residual vestibular function |
Ko et al.3232 Ko LW, Chikara RK, Chen PY, Jheng YC, Wang CC, Yang YC, et al. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (stochastic resonance) changes electroencephalography activities and postural control in patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction. Brain Sci. 2020;10:740.
|
2020/Taipei (Taiwan) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
7 individuals with bilateral vestibular hypofunction and control group
Freq.: 100 Hz
|
Intensity: from 200 to 1000 ΜA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural instability improvement |
Fujimoto et al.3333 Fujimoto C, Egami N, Kawahara T, Uemura Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamasoba T, et al. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation sustainably improves posture in bilateral vestibulopathy. Front Neurol. 2018;9:900.
|
2018/Tokyo (Japan) |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
13 individuals with bilateral vestibulopathy
Freq.: 20 Hz
|
Intensity: 100 to 1000 ΜA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural instability improvement |
Fujimoto et al.3434 Fujimoto C, Yamamoto Y, Kamogashira T, Kinoshita M, Egami N, Uemura Y, et al. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation induces a sustained improvement in body balance in elderly adults. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37575.
|
2016/Tokyo (Japan) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
30 healthy elderly divided into 2 groups
Freq.: from 1 to 10Hz
|
Intensity: from 0.5 to 2 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural instability improvement |
Sprenger et al.3535 Sprenger A, Spliethoff P, Rother M, Machner B, Helmchen C. Effects of perceptible and imperceptible galvanic vestibular stimulation on the postural control of patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. J Neurol. 2020;267:2383-97.
|
2020/Lüebeck (Germany) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
30 individuals with bilateral vestibular hyporeflexia and control group
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 0.5 to 1.5 mA |
GVS as a predictor of postural control safety and risk of fall |
Welgampola et al.3636 Welgampola MS, Ramsay E, Gleeson MJ, Day BL. Asymmetry of balance responses to monaural galvanic vestibular stimulation in subjects with vestibular schwannoma. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:1835–9.
|
2013/London (England) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
10 individuals with vestibular Schwannoma and control group
Freq.: 200Hz
|
Intensity: 1 mA |
GVS to diagnose residual vestibular function |
Liu et al.3737 Liu A, Bi H, Li Y Lee S, Cai J, Mi T, et al. Galvanic vestibular stimulation improves subnetwork interactions in Parkinson’s disease. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:6632394.
|
2021/Hefei (China) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
27 individuals with Parkinson’s disease and control group
Freq.: from 70 to 100Hz
|
Intensity: not informed |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on the improvement of motor deficits, balance and interhemispheric connectivity deficiency |
Cai et al.3838 Cai J, Lee S, Ba F, Garg S, Kim LJ, Liu A, et al. Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) Augments Deficient Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN) Connectivity in Mild Parkinson’s Disease: fMRI Effects of different stimuli. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:101.
|
2018/Vancouver(Canada) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
23 individuals with Parkinson’s disease and control group
Freq.: 128 Hz
|
Intensity: not reported |
GVS to increase Pedunculopontine nucleus Connectivity |
Kataoka et al.3939 Kataoka H, Okada Y, Kiriyama T, Kita Y, Nakamura J, Morioka S, et al. Can postural instability respond to galvanic vestibular stimulation in patients with parkinson’s disease? J Mov Disord. 2016;9:40–3.
|
2015/Nara (Japan) |
Descriptive cross-section Parkinson’s disease |
5 individuals with
Freq.: 100 Hz
|
Intensity: 0.7mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural instability improvement |
Pal et al.4040 Pal S, Rosengren SM, Colebatch JG. Stochastic galvanic vestibular stimulation produces a small reduction in sway in Parkinson’s disease. J Vestib Res. 2009;19:137–42.
|
2009/Sydney (Australia) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
5 individuals with Parkinson’s disease and control group
Freq.: 200Hz
|
Intensity: 0.1 to 0.5 mA |
GVS to reduce balance in postural assessment |
Khoshnam et al.4141 Khoshnam M, Häner DMC, Kuatsjah E, Zhang X, Menon C. Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on upper and lower extremities motor symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:633.
|
2018/Canada |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
11 individuals with Parkinson’s disease
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 10 ΜA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on motor symptoms of upper and lower limbs |
Okada et al.4242 Okada Y, Kita Y, Nakamura J, Kataoka H, Kiriyama T, Ueno S, et al. Galvanic vestibular stimulation may improve anterior bending posture in Parkinson’s disease. Neuroreport. 2015;26:405–10.
|
2015/Koryocho (Japan) |
Longitudinal clinical trial |
7 individuals with Parkinson’s disease and control group
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 0.7mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on the anterior flexion angle |
Oppenländer et al.4343 Oppenländer K, Utz KS, Reinhart S, Keller I, Kerkhoff G, Schaadt AK. Subliminal galvanic-vestibular stimulation recalibrates the distorted visual and tactile subjective vertical in right-sided stroke. Neuropsychologia. 2015;74:178–83.
|
2015/Saarbruecken (Germany) |
Longitudinal cohort |
24 individuals with CVA and non-exposed group
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 0.7mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on post-CVA verticality deficits in the visual and tactile modality |
Saj et al.4444 Saj A, Honoré J, Rousseaux M. Perception of the vertical in patients with right hemispheric lesion: effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:1509–12.
|
2005/Lille (France) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
17 individuals with hemispheric lesion and control group
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 1.5 mA |
Investigate the effects of GVS on subjective vertical vision |
Čobeljić et al.4545 Cobeljic RD, Ribaric-Jankes K, Aleksic A, Popovic-Maneski LZ, Schwirtlich LB, Popovic DB. Does galvanic vestibular stimulation decrease spasticity in clinically complete spinal cord injury? Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41:251–7.
|
2018/Belgrade (Serbia) |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
7 individuals with complete spinal cord injury
Freq.: not reported
Time: 15s
|
Intensity: 4 mA |
GVS to determine changes in clinical and biomechanical measures of spasticity |
Pasquier et al.4646 Pasquier F Denise P, Gauthier A, Bessot N, Quarck G. Impact of galvanic vestibular stimulation on anxiety level in young adults. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:14. Erratum in: Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:57.
|
2019/Caen (France) |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
22 individuals with a history of anxiety
Freq.: not informed
|
Intensity: 1 mA |
To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of GVS in the treatment of anxiety |
Dilda et al.4747 Dilda V, MacDougall HG, Curthoys IS, Moore ST. Effects of Galvanic vestibular stimulation on cognitive function. Exp Brain Res. 2012;216:275–85.
|
2012/New York (United States) |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
120 healthy subjects
Frequency: from 0.16 to 0.61 Hz
|
Intensity: from 1 to 5 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on cognition |
Hilliard et al.4848 Hilliard D, Passow S, Thurm F, Schuck NW, Garthe A, Kempermann G, et al. Noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation modulates spatial memory in young healthy adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9310.
|
2019/Dresden (Germany) |
Descriptive cross-sectional |
47 healthy subjects
Freq.: from 0.1 to 100Hz
|
Intensity: from 0.25 to 1.25 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on spatial learning and memory |
Wilkinson et al.4949 Wilkinson D, Nicholls S, Pattenden C, Kilduff P, Milberg W. Galvanic vestibular stimulation speeds visual memory recall. Exp Brain Res. 2008;189:243–8.
|
2008/Boston (United States) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
24 healthy individuals, divided into 2 groups
Freq.: 1000 Hz
|
Intensity: 3 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on visual memory |
Ceylan et al.5252 Ceylan DS, Atas A, Kaya M. The effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with vestibular disorders. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83:25–34.
|
2020/Istanbul (Turkey) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
42 subjects complaining of vertigo lasting longer that 1 year and control group
Freq.: 100 Hz
|
Intensity: from 1 to 5 mA |
GVS to promote improvement in vestibular rehabilitation |
Nooristani et al.5353 NooristaniM, MaheuM, HoudeMS, Bacon BA, Champoux F. Questioning the lasting effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on postural control. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224619.
|
2019/Montreal (Canada) |
Comparative cross-sectional |
28 young adults divided in 2 groups
Freq.: from 0 to 640 Hz
|
Intensity: 1 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural improvement |
Inukai et al.5454 Inukai Y, Masaki M, Otsuru N, Saito K, Miyaguchi S, Kojima S, et al. Effect of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation in community-dwelling elderly people: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:63.
|
2018/Niigata (Japan) |
Longitudinal clinical trial |
32 elderly and control group
Frequency: from 0.1 to 640 Hz
|
Intensity: 0.4 mA |
To evaluate the effects of GVS on postural instability improvement |
Carmona et al.5555 Carmona S, Ferrero A, Pianetti G, Escolá N, Arteaga MV, Frankel L. Galvanic vestibular stimulation improves the results of vestibular rehabilitation. Ann NYAcadSci. 2011;1233:E1–7.
|
2011/Rosario (Argentina) |
Longitudinal clinical trial |
19 subjects with uncompensated unilateral peripheral vestibular syndrome and control group
Freq.: 0 to 1 Hz
|
Intensity: 0.5 to 2 mA |
To evaluate the long-term effects of GVS on temporal sway improvement |