Highlights
GVS and ACS-VEMPs were compared in patients with unilateral MD and normal controls.
GVS was as effective as ACS for inducing VEMPs, and even faster than ACS.
GVS-VEMP recording can detect retrolabyrinthine degeneration in MD.
Abstract
Objectives:
Although the cause of Meniere’s disease (MD) is not fully understood, endolymphatic hydrops is widely believed to be responsible for MD. Previous studies have used Air-Conducted Sound (ACS)-induced Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMPs) to evaluate otolithic function in patients with MD. However, the use of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation-VEMPs (GVS-VEMPs) with other vestibular tests in MD has been rare. This study aimed to explore the application of galvanic VEMPs in assessing MD.
Methods:
Normal individuals and patients with unilateral definite MD were included in this retrospective study. All participants underwent pure tone audiometry. Ocular and cervical VEMPs induced by GVS, and ACS were recorded. The characteristic parameters of VEMPs (n1 latency, p1 latency, amplitude, and AR) were analyzed.
Results:
The provocation rates of GVS-VEMPs did not differ between MD patients and control individuals. Compared with ACS, GVS could evoke potentials with longer latencies. MD patients presented GVS-VEMPs with lower amplitudes and ACS-cVEMP with shorter latencies and had a higher response rate in GVS-oVEMP. However, no differences or correlations were found in the characteristic parameters of GVS-VEMPs among the different stages of MD.
Conclusions:
GVS is as effective as ACS for inducing VEMP, and GVS-VEMP recording can detect retrolabyrinthine degeneration in MD. Further research is needed to assess the utility of GVS-VEMP in the evaluation of MD severity.
Level of evidence: Level 4.
Keywords
Meniere’s disease; Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential; Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential; Air-Conducted Sound; Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
