1 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
F |
9-years |
U |
PDD-NOS–-3-years before – preimplant, 6-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated an increase in their comprehension of spoken words after implantation |
2 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
4-years |
U |
PDD-NOS–-Pervasive developmental disorder, 3-years post-implant 7-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated an increase in their comprehension of spoken words after implantation. Showed improvement in the auditory comprehension test score, going from a standard below 40 in the preoperative period to 72 stitches 5 years after surgery Demonstrated strong improvements in the Expressive Vocabulary Test, going from 54 points in the 24a month after implant until 81 60 months after implant Achieved a score of 100% correct on both words and sentences two years after implantation |
3 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
7-years |
U |
Autism, 2 years before – preimplant, 5-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Communication presented with other people through sign language and gestures |
4 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
3-years |
U |
Autism, 1-year post- implant–-4-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated an increase in their comprehension of spoken words after implantation |
5 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
8-years |
U |
Autism, 3-years before–-preimplant, 5-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated an increase in their comprehension of spoken words after implantation |
6 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
3-years |
U |
Autism, 2 years post- implant–-5-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated no comprehension of spoken words preoperatively or at the 12 months post-activation interval. |
7 |
Donaldson et al.1919 Donaldson AI, Heavner KS, Zwolan TA. Measuring progress in children with autism spectrum disorder who have cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666–71.
|
M |
3-years |
U |
Autism, 1-year before–-preimplant, 2-years-old |
Between 1998 and 2003 |
MacArthur Communication Development Inventory, EVT, PPVT-III, MAIS/IT-MAIS, GASP-W, GASP-S, Parental ratings |
Demonstrated an increase in their comprehension of spoken words after implantation |
8 |
Hayman and Franck20 |
M |
11.3 years |
None |
Autism, preimplant |
U |
Early Speech Perception Test, MLNT |
Have a total communication class with other children with cochlear implants. He is reading on almost a 3rd-grade level, and educators believe it will continue to improve. |
9 |
Robertson 11 |
U |
2.1 years |
None |
Autism, 8 months post-implant–-2,9- year-old |
2005 |
U |
PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System) |
10 |
Robertson 11 |
U |
2.6 years |
None |
Autism, 7-years post- implant–-9-years-old |
2005 |
U |
ISL (Irish Sign Language) |
11 |
Robertson 11 |
U |
2-years |
None |
Autism, 2.1-years post-implant–-4.1- years-old |
2007 |
U |
Spoken language Understands common phrases. Speech intelligible to familiar listeners |
12 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
4 (1) and 10 (2) years |
None |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation. ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39 questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘No awareness of environment’’ for ‘‘Identification/recognition of simple phrases (2 words) and commands’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘No vocalization’’ for ‘‘Simple Phrases and Commands (Where is X, let us go, etc.)’’ |
13 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
1.5 (1) and 6 (2) years |
None |
AutismNot informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation. ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39 questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘No awareness of environment’’ for ‘‘Understands conversations’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘No vocalization’’ for ‘‘Simple Phrases and Commands (Where is X, let’s go, etc.)’’ |
14 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
3-years |
None |
AutismNot informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation. ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39 questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘No awareness of environment’’ for ‘‘Understands conversations’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘Some vocalization (consonants, vowels, nasal sounds)’’ for ‘‘Simple Phrases and Commands (Where is X, let’s go, etc.)’’ |
15 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
4 (1) and 15 (2) years |
None |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation. ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39 questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘Identification/recognition of words’’ for ‘‘Understands conversations’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘No vocalization’’ for ‘‘Able to produce sentences’’. |
16 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
1.67 years |
None |
PDD-NOS (Pervasive developmental disorder–-not otherwise specified) not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘No awareness of environment’’ for ‘‘Understands conversations’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘No produce sentences’’ |
17 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
4-years |
None |
PDD-NOS (Pervasive developmental disorder–-not otherwise specified) not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘Identification/ recognition of words’’ for ‘‘Identification/ recognition of simple phrases (2-words) and commands’’. Speech Expression: unchanged. Kept ‘‘Some vocalization (consonants, vowels, nasal sounds)’’ |
18 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
2-years |
None |
PDD-NOS (Pervasive developmental disorder–-not otherwise specified) not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: changed of ‘‘No awareness of environment’’ for ‘‘Identification/ recognition of simple phrases (2-words) and commands’’. Speech Expression: changed of ‘‘No vocalization’’ for ‘‘Simple Phrases and Commands (Where is X, let’s go, etc.)’’ |
19 |
Eshraghi et al.2121 Eshraghi AA, Nazarian R, Telischi FF, Martinez D, Hodges A, Velandia S, et al. Cochlear implantation in children with Autism spectrum disorder. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:121–8.
|
U |
1.5 (1) and 2 (2) years |
None |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 1992 and 2011 |
Speech perception and speech expression evaluation ABR, ESP test, MLNT, PBK test Parental survey: 39questions evaluating the subjective impression of CI benefits |
Speech Perception: Understands conversations; Speech Expression: Able to produce sentences |
20 |
Mikic et al.2222 Mikic B, Jotic A, Miric D, Nikolic M, Jankovic N, Arsovic N. Receptive speech in early implanted children later diagnosed with autism. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:36–9.
|
M |
0.9-year |
U |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 2008 and 2009 |
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP); Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) |
Auditory processing developed slowly. Could identify environmental sounds or discriminate speech sounds, with very little progress up to six years old, despite extensive speech and language therapy. |
21 |
Mikic et al.2222 Mikic B, Jotic A, Miric D, Nikolic M, Jankovic N, Arsovic N. Receptive speech in early implanted children later diagnosed with autism. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:36–9.
|
M |
1-year |
U |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 2008 and 2009 |
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP); Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) |
Auditory processing developed slowly. Could identify environmental sounds or discriminate speech sounds, with very little progress up to six years old, despite extensive speech and language therapy. |
22 |
Mikic et al.2222 Mikic B, Jotic A, Miric D, Nikolic M, Jankovic N, Arsovic N. Receptive speech in early implanted children later diagnosed with autism. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:36–9.
|
F |
0.8-year |
U |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 2008 and 2009 |
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP); Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) |
Maintained the same pre- and post-IC characteristics Auditory processing developed slowly. Could identify environmental sounds or discriminate speech sounds, no progress up to six years old, despite extensive speech and language therapy. |
23 |
Mikic et al.2222 Mikic B, Jotic A, Miric D, Nikolic M, Jankovic N, Arsovic N. Receptive speech in early implanted children later diagnosed with autism. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133:36–9.
|
M |
1-year |
U |
Autism not informed if pre- or post-implant |
Between 2008 and 2009 |
Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP); Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) |
Auditory processing developed slowly. Could identify environmental sounds or discriminate speech sounds, with very little progress up to six years old, despite extensive speech and language therapy. |
24 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
F |
2.10 years |
None |
Autistic spectrum, post-implant |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
Non-user speech perception, No vocalization, Non-user the CI, Sign Communication |
25 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
M |
1.10 years |
None |
Autistic spectrum, post-implant |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
Identification/recognition of words Some vocalization (consonants, vowels, nasal sounds) User the CI Some vocalization and PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System) Communication |
26 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
M |
3.8 years |
None |
Autistic spectrum, post-implant |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
Understands conversations, Able to produce sentences, User the CI, Oral Communication |
27 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
M |
2.4 years |
None |
Autistic spectrum, post-implant |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
Identification/recognition of words Words only User the CI Words Communication |
28 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
M |
1-year |
None |
Autistic spectrum, post-implant |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
Identification/recognition of simple phrases (two words) and commands, Words only, User the CI, Word, sing and PECS (Picture Exchange Communication System) Communication |
29 |
Valero et al.2323 Valero MR, Sadadcharam M, Henderson L, Freeman SR, Lloyd S, Green KM, et al. Compliance with cochlear implantation in children subsequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17:200–6.
|
M |
1.10 years |
None |
PDD-NOS (Pervasive developmental disorder–-not |
Between 1989 and 2015 |
Speech perception and expression categories (adapted from otherwise specified), post-implant |
Non-user speech perception, No vocalization, Non-user the CI, None Communication Yeargin-Alisopp et al. 2003) |
30 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
1.9 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: No, Ling’s 6 sounds teste: No, Reaction to spoken name: No, Response to spoken request: No, Response to name: No, Response to environmental sounds: No, Behavior changes: None, Better family interactions: Yes |
31 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
2.5 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: Yes (only to drum), Ling’s 6 sounds teste: No, Reaction to spoken name: No, Response to spoken request: No, Response to name: No, Response to environmental sounds: No, Behavior changes: None, Better family interactions: Yes |
32 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
1.9 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: Yes (only to drum), Ling’s 6 sounds teste: No, Reaction to spoken name: No, Response to spoken request: No, Response to name: No, Response to environmental sounds: No, Behavior changes: Reduced anxiety, Better family interactions: Yes |
33 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
1.9 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: Yes (only to flute and drum), Ling’s 6 sounds teste: No, Reaction to spoken name: No, Response to spoken request: No, Response to name: Yes, Response to environmental sounds: Yes, Behavior changes: Reduced anxiety, Better family interactions: Yes |
34 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
1.3 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: Yes, Ling’s 6 sounds teste: Yes, Reaction to spoken name: Yes, Response to spoken request: Yes, Response to name: Yes, Response to environmental sounds: Yes, Behavior changes: Reduced anxiety, Better family interactions: Yes |
35 |
Lachowska et al.2424 Lachowska M, Pastuszka A, Łukaszewicz-Moszynsk´ a Z, Mikołajewska L, Niemczyk K. Cochlear implantation in autistic children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:15–9.
|
M |
2.2 years |
None |
Autism post- implant |
U |
Medical history, Reaction to music and sound, Ling’s six sounds test, Onomatopoeic word test, Reaction to spoken child’s name, Response to requests, the questionnaire given to parents, Sound processor fitting sessions and data |
Reaction to music: Yes, Ling’s 6 sounds teste: Yes, Reaction to spoken name: Yes, Response to spoken request: Yes, Response to name: Yes, Response to environmental sounds: Yes, Behavior changes: Reduced anxiety, Better family interactions: Yes |